<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4FR3c5eSp7ImA9WxJVFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373</id><updated>2009-07-02T18:01:56.921-07:00</updated><title>China Business Law Blog                中國商法博客</title><subtitle type="html">Thoughts and comments on Chinese business law and beyond</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>159</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><geo:lat>32.78133</geo:lat><geo:long>-96.801988</geo:long><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ChinaBusinessLaw" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">ChinaBusinessLaw</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMEQnw-eSp7ImA9WxVaE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-481643035984482970</id><published>2009-04-10T08:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-10T09:53:23.251-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-10T09:53:23.251-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Jury System" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Judiciary Reform" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Judiciary" /><title>China's Jury System</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/481643035984482970/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=481643035984482970" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/481643035984482970?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/481643035984482970?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/04/chinas-jury-system.html" title="China's Jury System" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">"I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution."--Thomas JeffersonTwo days ago, I had the pleasure of talking to Hon. Duan, a senior justice on the Supreme People's Court of China, who is currently on administrative leave to study American administrative laws here at SMU Law School.  In our two hour &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eZwZ_KmcWaM:FW0TaGVlmgg:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkENQX8yfSp7ImA9WxVaEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-1234340758979172941</id><published>2009-04-06T14:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-06T15:58:10.195-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-06T15:58:10.195-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Bankruptcy law" /><title>Economic Crisis Tests China's Enterprise Bankruptcy Law</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1234340758979172941/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=1234340758979172941" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/1234340758979172941?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/1234340758979172941?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/04/economic-crisis-tests-chinas-enterprise.html" title="Economic Crisis Tests China's Enterprise Bankruptcy Law" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><content type="html">The Economic Crisis is a Test of Character.  路遥知马力，日久见人心。(As distance tests a horse's strength, so time reveals' a person's heart.)China's Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (EBL) came out after more than one decade of debates and compromises, and it was applauded for advancing China's efforts in establishing a truly market-oriented economy.  More than two years after its promulgation, it has been tested &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zHmIBLBl2OU:GumDG4XeZQQ:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YNR306fSp7ImA9WxVbFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-5420405663102463397</id><published>2009-04-01T15:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-01T22:46:36.315-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-01T22:46:36.315-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Banking Regulations" /><title>Five Years Holding Period, Is it Fair?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5420405663102463397/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=5420405663102463397" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5420405663102463397?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5420405663102463397?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/04/five-years-holding-period-is-it-fair.html" title="Five Years Holding Period, Is it Fair?" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC)'s chairman, Liu Mingkang announced that rules will change for foreign invesors who invest in Chinese commercial banks.  Remember the blockbuster IPOs of Chinese state-owned banks?  Bank of China, China Construction Bank, China Industry and Commerce Bank all had their IPO a few years ago when the market was good.  Many foreign investors bought shares of &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=H6Hw_Z3Yr4U:7VsU_PsnzbE:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUQEQH05cSp7ImA9WxVUFUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-8168726509699370511</id><published>2009-03-20T17:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-20T18:01:41.329-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-20T18:01:41.329-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese Trademark Law" /><title>Seven Steps to Protect Your Trademark in China</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8168726509699370511/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=8168726509699370511" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8168726509699370511?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8168726509699370511?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/seven-steps-to-protect-your-trademark.html" title="Seven Steps to Protect Your Trademark in China" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Out-law.com ran an article written by Alison Ross, which discusses "How to Protect Your Brand in China."  I thought the author did a very good and thorough job in advising mark owners on how they should go about protecting their marks in a comprehensive and proative way in China.Here are the seven steps that Alison suggests as listed below:1. Register trade marks early2. Territorial registration3&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=d8WIZtWr0hM:6I-qgIgp8Ho:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEEDR3g8eSp7ImA9WxVUFUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-3995245683810607</id><published>2009-03-20T16:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-20T17:51:16.671-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-20T17:51:16.671-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Coca-Cola-Huiyuan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law" /><title>MOFCOM's Rejection of the Coke-Huiyuan Merger Disappoints Legal Experts</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3995245683810607/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=3995245683810607" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/3995245683810607?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/3995245683810607?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/mofcoms-rejection-of-coke-huiyuan.html" title="MOFCOM's Rejection of the Coke-Huiyuan Merger Disappoints Legal Experts" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">China, by and through MOFCOM, rejected Coca-Cola's bid to acquire the Chinese juice maker Huiyuan.  As soon as the news came out, it caught international attention and has been widely reported.  Many views float out there about why and how come. The Caijing Magzine in China came out with its own analysis of the legal implication of this decision.  Titled Legal Implications of Coke-Huiyuan, this &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=chzSRsbJyu4:nJGDmyXX5eo:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0UMSXwyeCp7ImA9WxVVGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-8279959749382321992</id><published>2009-03-12T15:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T16:08:08.290-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-12T16:08:08.290-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Judiciary Reform" /><title>Extraordinary Time is No Excuse for Extra Judicial Partiality</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8279959749382321992/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=8279959749382321992" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8279959749382321992?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8279959749382321992?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/extraordinary-time-is-no-excuse-for.html" title="Extraordinary Time is No Excuse for Extra Judicial Partiality" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><content type="html">Two camps of lawmakers are debating what role Chinese courts should play in China during this extraordinarily trying time.One camp believe that the courts should remain neutral, irrespective of how the financial and economic crisis is impacting businesses, and that the courts should be the instruments of justice in China's market economy.For example, lawmaker Peng Xuefeng, director of the All &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=U96TRIZVkyA:f3Edh6CXLY0:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk4DQXw7fyp7ImA9WxVVGEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-6097115286160840640</id><published>2009-03-11T16:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-11T16:42:50.207-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-11T16:42:50.207-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Bankruptcy law" /><title>The Case for Individual Bankruptcy in China (2)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/6097115286160840640/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=6097115286160840640" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/6097115286160840640?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/6097115286160840640?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/case-for-individual-bankruptcy-in-china.html" title="The Case for Individual Bankruptcy in China (2)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Right after the earthquakes in 2008, I wrote a post advocating for China to establish a individual bankrupty system. In that post, I gave cultural, economic and legal reasons in favor of such a system, in addition to China's fairly new Enterprise Bankruptcy Law.One Chinese lawmaker, Shi Ying, who is a deputy to the Chinese National People's Congress, submitted a bill to the NPC which is in &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HyqDtCF6TW4:HRbZtQBY-ZQ:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0ICRH44cCp7ImA9WxVVEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-1258855056915454839</id><published>2009-03-02T16:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-02T19:39:25.038-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-02T19:39:25.038-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China and WTO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Human Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="International Trade" /><title>International Trade, WTO and China Human Rights</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1258855056915454839/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=1258855056915454839" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/1258855056915454839?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/1258855056915454839?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/international-trade-wto-and-china-human.html" title="International Trade, WTO and China Human Rights" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">A few days after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's hopeful and celebrated official visit to China, the U.S. State Department issued its annual report on China's human rights record.  In it, the U.S. criticises China for silencing dissent and oppressing ethnic minorities.  Not to be outdone by the U.S., China hit back with its own Human Rights Record of the United States in 2008, enumerating a &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=MZg76uEyUIA:nzZOnOlZnOk:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0IGQ3g7cSp7ImA9WxVWGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-3629755805240908770</id><published>2009-02-28T05:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-28T06:32:02.609-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-28T06:32:02.609-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Food Safety Law" /><title>China Enacts Sweeping, Tough Food Safety Law</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3629755805240908770/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=3629755805240908770" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/3629755805240908770?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/3629755805240908770?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/china-enacts-sweeping-tough-food-safety.html" title="China Enacts Sweeping, Tough Food Safety Law" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress passed a brand new Food Safety Law on February 28, 2009, and the law is set to become effective on June 1, 2009.  Without having a chance to read it carefully, I have some preliminary comments as follows:1.  It repeals its predecessor law--the PRC Food Safety Law (1995) in its entirety.  With food safety disasters occurring back-to-back&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=43cwotxUoTQ:uB6KahI2Fho:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAFRno4cCp7ImA9WxVWFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-7944770104467494379</id><published>2009-02-23T16:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-23T16:51:57.438-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-23T16:51:57.438-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Technology Contracts Registration and Aministration Measures" /><title>Measures for the Registration and Administration of Import and Export Technology Contracts</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/7944770104467494379/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=7944770104467494379" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/7944770104467494379?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/7944770104467494379?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/measures-for-registration-and.html" title="Measures for the Registration and Administration of Import and Export Technology Contracts" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">On February 1, 2009, the Minister for China's Ministry of Commerce signed into law the Measures for the Registration and Aministration of Import and Export Technology Contracts. (in Chinese) ("Technology Contract Measures")  This is a ministry level administrative regulation, and it will become effective on March 2, 2009.To summarize, the Technology Contract Measures include the following &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=AP4AtIKwxR8:92bhYiFPHnE:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUcEQXY5eCp7ImA9WxVWEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-196094302004407914</id><published>2009-02-20T19:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-20T19:30:00.820-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-20T19:30:00.820-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Financial Meltdown" /><title>"Inside the Meltdown"</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/196094302004407914/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=196094302004407914" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/196094302004407914?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/196094302004407914?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/inside-meltdown.html" title="&quot;Inside the Meltdown&quot;" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Frontline (PBS) recently produced an in-depth documentary on the financial meltdown.  It is an attempt at figuring out the root causes of the problems that led to the current economic crisis affecting the entire globe.  It is well worth your time to watch it.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=XM5IkX1u0-8:aL0xSdRsxmI:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0QCQH09fSp7ImA9WxVWEU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-5651422765659866850</id><published>2009-02-20T05:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-20T06:16:01.365-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-20T06:16:01.365-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Law Symposium" /><title>China International Law Symposium at UT (Austin)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5651422765659866850/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=5651422765659866850" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5651422765659866850?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5651422765659866850?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/china-international-law-symposium-at-ut.html" title="China International Law Symposium at UT (Austin)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The University of Texas International Law Journal will be hosting a China law related symposium on February 26, and 27, 2009.

Here is how it is described:

&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&amp;gt;     Normal   0         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4   &lt;![endif]--&amp;gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&amp;gt;     &lt;![endif]--&amp;gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&amp;gt;  st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }  &lt;![endif]--&amp;gt; &lt;!--  /* &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=eDHwu-wURNc:bnsxW6SeyR8:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEINQnc-fyp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-2566045668026777966</id><published>2009-02-18T16:32:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T17:23:13.957-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T17:23:13.957-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Enforcement of Judgments in China" /><title>Enforcements of Judgments in China: Pretty Good in Urban Areas (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2566045668026777966/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=2566045668026777966" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2566045668026777966?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2566045668026777966?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/enforcements-of-judgments-in-china.html" title="Enforcements of Judgments in China: Pretty Good in Urban Areas (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Contrary to the popular view that enforcement of judgments is poor in China, Professor Randall Peerenboom stated in his recent article that: While enforcement is often portrayed as difficult in China, recent studies have found significant improvements in urban areas, where more than half of creditor-plaintiffs receive 100 per cent of the amount owed, and three quarters are able to receive partial&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=Zb3J0DZDPt0:ukzHmUSjs5k:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUAQ38-eCp7ImA9WxVWEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-362516619489476525</id><published>2009-02-18T16:28:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-19T07:44:02.150-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-19T07:44:02.150-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Trademark Law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China IP Law" /><title>Yellow Cranes, Will You Return? (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/362516619489476525/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=362516619489476525" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/362516619489476525?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/362516619489476525?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/yellow-cranes-will-you-return-republish.html" title="Yellow Cranes, Will You Return? (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><content type="html"> The Yellow Crane TowerForefathers departed on yellow cranes,leaving this spectacular tower empty.Yellow cranes will not return,leaving the white clouds for millennia without companion.–by Cui Hao (704-754 A.D.), Tang DynastyThis poem has remained one of my favorites, throughout my education in China. In college in the city of Wuhan, I passed by the truly spectacular Yellow Crane Tower hundreds &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=sz5Ej9XTy4s:9cZcq1e7rRw:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUUBSH08eCp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-679582341656755018</id><published>2009-02-18T16:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:27:39.370-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:27:39.370-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese Labor Law" /><title>Minimum Wages; Big Differences (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/679582341656755018/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=679582341656755018" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/679582341656755018?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/679582341656755018?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/minimum-wages-big-differences-republish.html" title="Minimum Wages; Big Differences (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">On my blog, I see a lot of searches for minimum wage standards in China, and I have been waiting for a compiled chart, detailing the wage standards. Given the size of China and the huge variance of economic development, minimum wage standards vary considerably. I need to wait no more as China Herald just posted a piece, in which Fons Tuinstra stated that a team from the Renmin University of China&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=CrFJ8fCp3vM:COr_a62BCmk:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYDR386fSp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-2068319932725062180</id><published>2009-02-18T16:25:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:26:16.115-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:26:16.115-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Litigation in China" /><title>Amount in Controversy and Jurisdiction Redefined by the SPC (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2068319932725062180/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=2068319932725062180" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2068319932725062180?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2068319932725062180?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/amount-in-controversy-and-jurisdiction.html" title="Amount in Controversy and Jurisdiction Redefined by the SPC (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">On March 31, 2008, the Supreme People promulgated a new set of judicial rules, redefining first-instance jurisdiction of higher and intermediate people’s courts in civil matters across the country.In these extremely detailed rules, the SPC lays out the required amount in controversy in order for higher or intermediate people’s courts to exercise first-instance jurisdiction over civil cases. What &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=dQvGzBVlD0E:n7dSUmMoCD0:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEQGSHc4fSp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-2470526628124513750</id><published>2009-02-18T16:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T17:18:49.935-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T17:18:49.935-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Litigation in China" /><title>Summary Judgment/Procedure in China (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2470526628124513750/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=2470526628124513750" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2470526628124513750?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2470526628124513750?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/summary-judgmentprocedure-in-china.html" title="Summary Judgment/Procedure in China (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Having been working on summary judgment motions at work for three consecutive weeks, I kept thinking whetherChina has something similar to summary judgment in its civil trials. With limited knowledge on Chinese procedural laws, I disclaim that what I write here is really subject to future corrections from readers.In the United States, summary judgments are available in federal and state courts. &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=WYTh6a6Avmk:fVMYc3FSEFk:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcFRn07fCp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-8457783715351536792</id><published>2009-02-18T16:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:23:37.304-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:23:37.304-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sichuan Earthquake" /><title>Sichuan Earthquake (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8457783715351536792/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=8457783715351536792" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8457783715351536792?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8457783715351536792?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/sichuan-earthquake-republish.html" title="Sichuan Earthquake (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Closely following the news in and outside China on the Sichuan earthquake, I elected to avoid blogging about it as I thought any writing from me will be, largely, irrelevant to the suffering of the victims and China in general. In addition, other China law bloggers, such as the CLB and China Esquire, have provided information on how to donate for the disaster relief in China. However, after my &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=-xlYUk9QQN0:YGde3xZsVGQ:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4ASX07eCp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-2964262622904921938</id><published>2009-02-18T16:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:22:28.300-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:22:28.300-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Enterprise Bankruptcy Law" /><title>The Case for Individual Bankruptcy in China (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2964262622904921938/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=2964262622904921938" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2964262622904921938?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/2964262622904921938?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/case-for-individual-bankruptcy-in-china.html" title="The Case for Individual Bankruptcy in China (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Some stories rattle you so much that you cannot stop thinking about’em for a long time, and the story of Mr. Chen Si did just that to me.Chen Si, as reported by the LA Times in its story titledOn His Weekends, Chinese Samaritan Saves Lives, is a manager of a shipping company in the city of Nanjing. On weekends, he patrols the Nanjing Changjiang Bridge, known as the “bridge of death.” For almost &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=50EA6bKuZFc:Ork6sBR6Ftg:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEANSH88cSp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-5748610484946013223</id><published>2009-02-18T16:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:19:59.179-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:19:59.179-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wahaha v. Danone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Trademark Law" /><title>“Wahaha” Ain’t French, and It Belongs to China. (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5748610484946013223/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=5748610484946013223" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5748610484946013223?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5748610484946013223?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/wahaha-aint-french-and-it-belongs-to.html" title="“Wahaha” Ain’t French, and It Belongs to China. (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Major news came out of the Danone v. Wahaha lawsuit saga, and it is again bad for Danone.On July 30, 2008, the Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled that the “Wahaha” trademark belongs to the Wahaha Co. , not the joint venture between Danone and Wahaha, of which Danone is the majority shareholder.Because this ruling affirms that of the Hangzhou Arbitration Commission  of December 2007 &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=HsNT6gHy0R4:1QvQkLmvjuM:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEAFRnk5eSp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-8536695144727765774</id><published>2009-02-18T16:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:18:37.721-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:18:37.721-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Macau IP Law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China IP Law" /><title>IP Registration in Macao (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8536695144727765774/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=8536695144727765774" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8536695144727765774?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8536695144727765774?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/ip-registration-in-macao-republish.html" title="IP Registration in Macao (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Just ran across an article Filing for Industrial Property Protection in Macau, China.  I thought it is very informative about Macao and its IP laws.Here is what it has to say about Macao:Macao is a small territory set on the southern coast of China, located not far from Hong Kong. It was colonized by the Portuguese in the 1500’s and became the first European settlement in the Far East. Macao’s &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=IshBfH9Ne8U:Vh-zqKSkO7E:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEARn08fyp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-4630040912116189271</id><published>2009-02-18T16:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:17:27.377-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:17:27.377-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese Tort Law" /><title>Any Recourse for the Slaying of American Tourist in Beijing? (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/4630040912116189271/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=4630040912116189271" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/4630040912116189271?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/4630040912116189271?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/any-recourse-for-slaying-of-american.html" title="Any Recourse for the Slaying of American Tourist in Beijing? (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">By now, I think everybody knows about the brutal attack and killing of Mr. Todd Bachman, an American tourist at the Bell Tower in Beijing on the first day of the Olympic Games. Caijing has a nice rendition of what happened:Workers at a Hangzhou instrument gauge factory in eastern China’s Zhejiang Province remember Tang Yongming as an ordinary colleague who liked to joke and play cards at a local &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=L8knwGsSxXY:obxdR_oHoSs:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEIDRXk7fyp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-4231287263128355608</id><published>2009-02-18T16:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:16:14.707-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:16:14.707-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chinese Tort Law" /><title>What If Pigs Fly? (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/4231287263128355608/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=4231287263128355608" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/4231287263128355608?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/4231287263128355608?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/what-if-pigs-fly-republish.html" title="What If Pigs Fly? (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">“Why if pigs fly?” as my boss always asks.Dan at China Law Blog beat me to blogging about the New York Times articleCourts Compound Pain of China’s Tainted Milk.  Doubting that I can say anything more eloquent about this topic, I quote Dan in full here:This New York Times article does as good a job of any at setting out the issues China is facing in deciding whether to allow milk taint victims to&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=9rBTe2TSOvM:x4WLObJ8LbU:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMNRn08eyp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-5508917671005763901</id><published>2009-02-18T16:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:14:57.373-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:14:57.373-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Enterprise Bankruptcy Law" /><title>Sanlu Group Co. Bankrupt: Morally &amp; Financially (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5508917671005763901/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=5508917671005763901" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5508917671005763901?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/5508917671005763901?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/sanlu-group-co-bankrupt-morally.html" title="Sanlu Group Co. Bankrupt: Morally &amp; Financially (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">It has been reported that the infamous Sanlu Group Co. has been declared bankrupt by a Chinese court (h/t China Digital Times).  It is about time.For background information, Sanlu Group Co. is one of the companies that manufactured and sold adulterated dairy products, including baby formula, tainted with industrial melamine.Sanlu Group Co. and its board were thoroughly morally bankrupt.  The &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zi3PnrLoo5Q:TUccInULEg8:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMHR345cSp7ImA9WxVWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5979466334315004373.post-8773238656790507369</id><published>2009-02-18T16:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T16:13:56.029-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-18T16:13:56.029-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="China Enterprise Bankruptcy Law" /><title>The Protection of Secured Creditors in China Under the New Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (Republish)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8773238656790507369/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5979466334315004373&amp;postID=8773238656790507369" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8773238656790507369?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5979466334315004373/posts/default/8773238656790507369?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2009/02/protection-of-secured-creditors-in.html" title="The Protection of Secured Creditors in China Under the New Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (Republish)" /><author><name>Brad Luo 罗竞雄</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06267245085217325211</uri><email>bradfordluo@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11937850189780616070" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html"> Bankruptcy law is exceedingly complex yet interesting.  It is complex because the law has to banlance many competing interests when a business entity falls into financial trouble: the entity itself, its employees, its secured creditors, its general unsecured creditors, its owners, its suppliers, and the federal government (the IRS).  It is interesting because bankruptcy constitutes either the &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?a=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:wF9xT3WuBAs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ChinaBusinessLaw?i=zUu8K7aeuWk:wYAKWFlAG1I:wF9xT3WuBAs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</content></entry></feed>
