<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Circuit Splits</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-99919764353619725</id>
    <updated>2013-04-16T06:20:00-07:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Your source for the latest news and analysis on divisions between the circuit courts on important matters of law.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CircuitSplits" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="circuitsplits" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
        <title>From Dicta to Disarray: Split on the Domestic Relations Exception</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/04/from-dicta-to-disarray-split-on-the-domestic-relations-exception.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/04/from-dicta-to-disarray-split-on-the-domestic-relations-exception.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0133f301dad7970b017c3875ae9a970b</id>
        <published>2013-04-16T06:20:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-04-16T15:56:24-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Today I’m delighted to introduce Ben Ashmore, the founder and president of the National Family Civil Rights Center, as this week’s guest blogger. In In re Burrus, the Supreme Court stated in dicta that “[t]he whole subject of domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs to the laws of the states and not to the United States.” 136 U.S. 586, 593 (1890). This dicta is now firmly entrenched in federal jurisprudence thanks...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Nicholas J. Wagoner</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="cert. petition " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fifth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="guest post" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Ninth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sixth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tenth Circuit" />
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Growing Circuit Split Over Removal Statutes</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/01/growing-circuit-split-over-removal-statutes.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/01/growing-circuit-split-over-removal-statutes.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0133f301dad7970b017ee7bfff11970d</id>
        <published>2013-01-23T03:27:00-08:00</published>
        <updated>2013-01-23T03:27:00-08:00</updated>
        <summary>In the recent decision in Smith v. Detroit Entertainment, LLC, Slip Copy, 2013 WL 119673 (E.D.Mich. Jan. 9, 2013), the federal court in the Eastern District of Michigan highlighted a growing circuit split over removal statutes - and contributed to the split by leading the Sixth Circuit into the fray. At issue in this action by an employee for unpaid wages was whether the removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441, would permit the employer to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dru Stevenson</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="employment law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Ninth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Seventh Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sixth Circuit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tenth Circuit" />
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Article Addresses Circuit Split Over Pay-for-Delay Settlements</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/01/new-article-addresses-circuit-split-over-pay-for-delay-settlements.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.circuitsplits.com/2013/01/new-article-addresses-circuit-split-over-pay-for-delay-settlements.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0133f301dad7970b017c361ce8d1970b</id>
        <published>2013-01-22T15:57:00-08:00</published>
        <updated>2013-01-22T15:57:00-08:00</updated>
        <summary>A new article posted on SSRN, Waiting is the Hardest Part: Why the Supreme Court Should Adopt the Third Circuit's Analysis of Pay-for-Delay Settlement Agreements (by Marlee Kutcher), addresses the current circuit split over the legality of reverse payment settlements ("pay-for-delay") in pharmaceutical patent litigation. Although the paper strongly advocates one particular approach, the discussion of this complex issue is very good - highly recommended reading. Here is the Abstract: The high cost of prescription...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dru Stevenson</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="antitrust law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="healthcare law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="remedies" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="research" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="scholarship" />
        
        



    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
