<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>CiscoZine</title>
	
	<link>http://www.ciscozine.com</link>
	<description>Daily reporting on Cisco technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Ciscozine" /><feedburner:info uri="ciscozine" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>Ciscozine</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/Ciscozine" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.yourminis.com/subscribe.aspx?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.yourminis.com/images/addtoyourminisbadge.gif">Subscribe with Yourminis.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://hub.netomat.net/account/account.autoSubscribe.jspa?urls=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.netomat.net/blogger/images/icon_netomat_feedbutton.gif">Subscribe with netomat Hub</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FCiscozine" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>May 2013: two Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/7yU-BB8c31w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/06/05/may-2013-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1091</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published two important vulnerability advisories: Cisco TelePresence Supervisor MSE 8050 Denial of Service Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Customer Voice Portal Software Cisco TelePresence Supervisor MSE 8050 Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Supervisor MSE 8050 contains a vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause high CPU utilization and a reload of the affected system. Vulnerable Products Cisco TelePresence Supervisor MSE 8050 running software versions 2.2(1.17) and earlier are affected by this vulnerability. Details A vulnerability in the network stack of the Cisco TelePresence MSE 8050 Supervisor [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/7yU-BB8c31w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/06/05/may-2013-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/06/05/may-2013-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Reload in X? Why don’t you rollback or replace the configuration?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/EWuEbDQcFe4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/14/reload-in-x-why-dont-you-rollback-or-replace-the-configuration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roolback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1083</guid>
		<description>Do you remember the article &amp;#8216;How to schedule a reload&amp;#8216;? This feature (reload in &amp;#8216;x&amp;#8217;) is useful when you must apply a critical configuration on a remote device, for instance new route or new acl. In fact, if you happen to lose connection to device after a change, you must wait the device reload to reconnect to it. This can be a solution but there is a better solution: the replace/roolback feature. Introduced in 12.3(7)T IOS, the Configuration Replace and Configuration Rollback features provide the capability to replace the current running configuration with any saved Cisco IOS configuration file. This [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/EWuEbDQcFe4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/14/reload-in-x-why-dont-you-rollback-or-replace-the-configuration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/14/reload-in-x-why-dont-you-rollback-or-replace-the-configuration/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using IP SLA to change routing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/iWQ6tzLk9kA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/08/using-ip-sla-to-change-routing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1074</guid>
		<description>Cisco IP SLAs is a part of Cisco IOS that allows Cisco customers to analyze IP service levels for IP applications and services by using active traffic monitoring for measuring network performance. With Cisco IOS IP SLAs, service provider customers can measure and provide service level agreements, and enterprise customers can verify service levels, verify outsourced service level agreements, and understand network performance. Cisco IOS IP SLAs can perform network assessments, verify quality of service (QoS), ease the deployment of new services, and assist with network troubleshooting. IP SLAs collects a unique subset of these performance metrics: Delay (both round-trip [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/iWQ6tzLk9kA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/08/using-ip-sla-to-change-routing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/08/using-ip-sla-to-change-routing/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2013: ten Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/QC3IYXjpEyE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/02/april-2013-ten-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL injection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1084</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published ten important vulnerability advisories: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco NX-OS-Based Products Cisco Device Manager Command Execution Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Computing System Cisco Network Admission Control Manager SQL Injection Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Infrastructure Denial of Service Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS XE Software for 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Firewall Services Module Software Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA Software Cisco Prime Network Control Systems Database Default Credentials Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Solution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco NX-OS-Based Products Cisco Nexus, Cisco [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/QC3IYXjpEyE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/02/april-2013-ten-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/05/02/april-2013-ten-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>PBR: Route a packet based on source IP address</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/ltfy9G6ldt4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/23/pbr-route-a-packet-based-on-source-ip-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1075</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows that the routing table lists the routes to particular network destinations, but is it possible define the next-hop based on source ip, packet size or other criteria? Obviously yes! Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a tool for forwarding and routing data packets based on policies defined by network administrators. In effect, it is a way to have the policy override routing protocol decisions. Policy-based routing includes a mechanism for selectively applying policies based on access list, packet size or other criteria. The actions taken can include routing packets on user-defined routes, setting the precedence, type of service bits, etc. Policy-based routing [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/ltfy9G6ldt4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/23/pbr-route-a-packet-based-on-source-ip-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/23/pbr-route-a-packet-based-on-source-ip-address/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2013: seven Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/ixggKst2wxE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/12/march-2013-seven-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1072</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published seven important vulnerability advisories: Cisco IOS Software Zone-Based Policy Firewall Session Initiation Protocol Inspection Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Resource Reservation Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software IP Service Level Agreement Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Smart Install Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Protocol Translation Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Network Address Translation Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Internet Key Exchange Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Zone-Based Policy Firewall Session Initiation Protocol Inspection Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software contains a memory leak vulnerability that could be [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/ixggKst2wxE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/12/march-2013-seven-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/12/march-2013-seven-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager 6.3.2 – Multiple vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/_HAENEdnPjU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/09/cisco-video-surveillance-operations-manager-6-3-2-multiple-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XSS vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description>Part of the Cisco Video Surveillance Manager product suite, the Cisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager enables the efficient and effective configuration and management of video throughout an enterprise. It provides a secure web portal to configure, manage, display, and control video in an IP network, and provides the ability to easily manage a large number of security assets and users, including media server instances, cameras, encoders, and event sources, as well as digital monitors. # Exploit Title:Cisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager Multiple vulnerabilities # Google Dork: intitle:"Video Surveillance Operations Manager &amp;#62; Login" # Date: 22 Feb 2013 reported to the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/_HAENEdnPjU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/09/cisco-video-surveillance-operations-manager-6-3-2-multiple-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/04/09/cisco-video-surveillance-operations-manager-6-3-2-multiple-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2013: four Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/jT0qRopaiuc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/03/04/february-2013-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1065</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published four important vulnerability advisories: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities Cisco Prime Central for Hosted Collaboration Solution Assurance Excessive CPU Utilization Vulnerability Cisco Unified Presence Server Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco ATA 187 Analog Telephone Adaptor Remote Access Vulnerability Cisco Unified Communications Manager Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities Cisco Unified Communications Manager contains two vulnerabilities that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could cause an interruption of voice services. Vulnerable Products The following products are [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/jT0qRopaiuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/03/04/february-2013-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/03/04/february-2013-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NAT Virtual Interface aka NVI, what is that?!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/FJ3WA4oqI7w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/28/nat-virtual-interface-aka-nvi-what-is-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description>Not everyone knows that from IOS version 12.3(14)T, Cisco has introduced a new feature called NAT Virtual Interface; NVI removes the requirements to configure an interface as either NAT inside or NAT outside. An interface can be configured to use NAT or not use NAT. How to use NVI? It&amp;#8217;s easy! You must use the command &amp;#8216;ip nat source &amp;#8230;&amp;#8217; without specifying the inside/outside tag and enable the nat to the interfaces using the command &amp;#8216;ip nat enable&amp;#8217;. For instance, if you use legacy statement: Ciscozine(config)#interface range fastEthernet 0/0 Ciscozine(config-if-range)#ip nat inside Ciscozine(config)#interface range fastEthernet 0/1 Ciscozine(config-if-range)#ip nat outside Ciscozine(config)#ip nat inside source static 172.16.0.6 [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/FJ3WA4oqI7w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/28/nat-virtual-interface-aka-nvi-what-is-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/28/nat-virtual-interface-aka-nvi-what-is-that/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Unity Express Multiple Vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/51MpblC81CI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/22/cisco-unity-express-multiple-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Unity Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1048</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Unity Express software contains two important vulnerabilities: CVE ID: CVE-2013-1114: Cisco Unity Express software prior to version 8.0 contains vulnerabilities that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross site scripting attacks.  The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted requests. However, all affected versions of the software have reached End of Software Maintenance or Last Day of Support. CVE ID: CVE-2013-1120: Cisco Unity Express software prior to version 8.0 contains vulnerabilities that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross site request forgery attacks.  The vulnerabilities are due [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/51MpblC81CI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/22/cisco-unity-express-multiple-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/22/cisco-unity-express-multiple-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using route maps for conditional NAT</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/ChGAj8n_Lqk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/20/using-route-maps-for-conditional-nat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[route maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description>As explained in a previous article, NAT is the process of modifying IP address information in IP packet headers, while route maps are mainly used to redistribute and manipulate routes (OSPF, BGP, EIGRP, and so on). The question is obvious&amp;#8230; What is the relationship between these two features? Static NAT configuration with the route-map option can be used to implement destination-based NAT scenarios where the same inside local address needs to be translated to more than one inside global address, depending on where the traffic is destined. How to define the conditional NAT? See you below: Suppose that for several reasons (overlapping, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/ChGAj8n_Lqk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/20/using-route-maps-for-conditional-nat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/20/using-route-maps-for-conditional-nat/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NAT and PAT: a complete explanation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/c3hLHuXNlDc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/16/nat-and-pat-a-complete-explanation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load balancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protocols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description>Network address translation (NAT) is the process of modifying IP address information in IP packet headers while in transit across a traffic routing device. There are two different types of NAT: NAT Static NAT: The simplest type of NAT provides a one-to-one translation of IP addresses. It is often also referred to as one-to-one NAT. In this type of NAT only the IP addresses, IP header checksum and any higher level checksums that include the IP address need to be changed. The rest of the packet can be left untouched (at least for basic TCP/UDP functionality, some higher level protocols may [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/c3hLHuXNlDc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/16/nat-and-pat-a-complete-explanation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/16/nat-and-pat-a-complete-explanation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2013: five Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/SPe_HrKTJ1k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/12/january-2013-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffer overflows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.323]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published five important vulnerability advisories: Portable SDK for UPnP Devices Contains Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers Cisco ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall H.323 Inspection Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution Command Execution Vulnerability Cisco Unified IP Phone Local Kernel System Call Input Validation Vulnerability Portable SDK for UPnP Devices Contains Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities The Portable Software Developer Kit (SDK) for Universal Plug-n-Play (UPnP) Devices contains a libupnp library, originally known as the Intel SDK for UPnP Devices, which is vulnerable to multiple stack-based buffer [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/SPe_HrKTJ1k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/12/january-2013-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2013/02/12/january-2013-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2012: two Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/blbM0mERsuI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/12/13/november-2012-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ironport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1028</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published two important vulnerability advisories: Cisco IronPort Appliances Sophos Anti-Virus Vulnerabilities Cisco Secure Access Control System TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability Cisco IronPort Appliances Sophos Anti-Virus Vulnerabilities Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliances (ESA) and Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliances (WSA) include versions of Sophos Anti-Virus that contain multiple vulnerabilities that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain control of the system, escalate privileges, or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending malformed files to an appliance that is running Sophos Anti-Virus. The malformed files could [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/blbM0mERsuI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/12/13/november-2012-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/12/13/november-2012-two-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Switchport capture: a good alternative to SPAN port</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/PlG4m73Us9s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/27/switchport-capture-a-good-alternative-to-span-port/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sniffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1015</guid>
		<description>Do you remember the article &amp;#8220;How to analyze traffic with SPAN feature&amp;#8220;? The SPAN port is a feature that mirror traffic (on physical or virtual port) to a specific port. In general, behind this &amp;#8216;destination&amp;#8217; port can be a traffic analyzer (wireshark, ntop and so on&amp;#8230;), an IDS or other appliances. The SPAN feature is a good tool but it has two limitations: The number of SPAN sessions that can be configured is limited. A destination port receives copies of sent and received traffic for all monitored source ports. If a destination port is oversubscribed, it can become congested. This [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/PlG4m73Us9s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/27/switchport-capture-a-good-alternative-to-span-port/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/27/switchport-capture-a-good-alternative-to-span-port/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco DPC2100 Denial of Service</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/1ZagSKk_Cn0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/16/cisco-dpc2100-denial-of-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description>Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) software 6.0 before 6.0.200.0, 7.0 before 7.0.98.216, and 7.0.1xx before 7.0.112.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a sequence of ICMP packets, aka Bug ID CSCth74426. Solution: Upgrade to the version specified in the vendor advisory or higher, as it has been reported to fix this vulnerability. An upgrade is required as there are no known workarounds. Vulnerability (Only for test): # Exploit Title: Cisco DPC2100 Denial of Service # Date: 09/01/2010 # Author: Daniel Smith # Software Link: http://www.cisco.com/ # Version: HW:2.1/SW:v2.0.2r1256-060303 # Tested on: OSX [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/1ZagSKk_Cn0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/16/cisco-dpc2100-denial-of-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/16/cisco-dpc2100-denial-of-service/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Linksys PlayerPT ActiveX Control Buffer Overflow</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/kvsKte1TIqo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/15/cisco-linksys-playerpt-activex-control-buffer-overflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffer overflows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linksys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description>Cisco Linksys PlayerPT ActiveX is prone to an overflow condition. The SetSource() function fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input resulting in a stack based buffer overflow. With a specially crafted argument, a remote attacker can potentially cause execution of arbitrary code. Solution: Currently, there are no known upgrades or patches to correct this vulnerability. It is possible to correct the flaw by implementing the following workaround: set the kill-bit on the PlayerPT.ocx ActiveX Control [ {9E065E4A-BD9D-4547-8F90-985DC62A5591} ]. See Microsoft KB article 240797 for additional details. Vulnerability (Only for test): ## # This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/kvsKte1TIqo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/15/cisco-linksys-playerpt-activex-control-buffer-overflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/15/cisco-linksys-playerpt-activex-control-buffer-overflow/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2012: five Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/t0RNtja57zM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/12/october-2012-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL injection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published five important vulnerability advisories: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA Services Module Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Firewall Services Module Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Cisco WebEx Recording Format Player Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA Services Module Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA Services Module [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/t0RNtja57zM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/12/october-2012-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/11/12/october-2012-five-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2012: eleven Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/8Ymu5zf8t7c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/10/18/september-2012-eleven-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=1010</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published eleven important vulnerability advisories: Cisco IOS Software Network Address Translation Vulnerabilities Cisco IOS Software Intrusion Prevention System Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Initiation Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Session Initiation Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software DHCP Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Tunneled Traffic Queue Wedge Vulnerability Cisco Catalyst 4500E Series Switch with Cisco Catalyst Supervisor Engine 7L-E Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software DHCP Version 6 Server Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Malformed Border Gateway [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/8Ymu5zf8t7c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/10/18/september-2012-eleven-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/10/18/september-2012-eleven-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>WhoisUP – Is your host up or down?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/dtByIj-0zTs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/09/18/whoisup-is-your-host-up-or-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WhoisUP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description>During last months, I have not written tutorial about Cisco technology because I have dedicated my free time to write my personal script to monitor hosts, router and so on. Why write a new script and not use a pre-existent script/software? The reasons are different, but in particular three: Surfing the web, I have found software that check hosts with a minute delay (they use crontab&amp;#8230;), but in my case I want to check hosts continuously; other software can check hosts continually, but they are too complex for my purpose and they have features don&amp;#8217;t needed in my case. They can be too expensive. The second reason [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/dtByIj-0zTs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/09/18/whoisup-is-your-host-up-or-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/09/18/whoisup-is-your-host-up-or-down/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2012: four Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/3uxtxbA4T1c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/08/08/july-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 06:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privilege escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=991</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published four important vulnerability advisories: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Immersive Endpoint Devices Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Manager Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Recording Server Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Immersive Endpoint Devices Cisco TelePresence Endpoint devices contain the following vulnerabilities: Cisco TelePresence API Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Remote Command Execution Vulnerability Cisco TelePresence Cisco Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Vulnerable Products Cisco TelePresence Manager, Cisco TelePresence Recording Server, Cisco TelePresence Multipoint Switch, and Cisco TelePresence Immersive Endpoint System may [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/3uxtxbA4T1c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/08/08/july-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/08/08/july-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2012: four Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/ODIspmbW9fA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/07/04/june-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AnyConnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebEx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=986</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published four important vulnerability advisories: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in the Cisco WebEx Player Cisco Application Control Engine Administrator IP Address Overlap Vulnerability Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA Services Module Denial of Service Vulnerability Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in the Cisco WebEx Player The Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player contains four buffer overflow vulnerabilities and the Cisco Advanced Recording Format (ARF) player contains one buffer overflow vulnerability. In some cases, exploitation of the vulnerabilities could allow [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/ODIspmbW9fA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/07/04/june-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/07/04/june-2012-four-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to configure Cisco VPN SSL aka WebVPN</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/2kABJG_pWOM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/27/how-to-configure-cisco-vpn-ssl-aka-webvpn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebVPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=948</guid>
		<description>The SSL VPN feature (also known as WebVPN) provides support for remote user access to enterprise networks from anywhere on the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer- (SSL-) enabled SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support. What is SSL? Secure Sockets Layer is a protocol developed by Netscape for transmitting private documents [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/2kABJG_pWOM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/27/how-to-configure-cisco-vpn-ssl-aka-webvpn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/27/how-to-configure-cisco-vpn-ssl-aka-webvpn/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2012: one Cisco vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/CH6GJ6bHrbw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/06/may-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 06:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published one important vulnerability advisory: Cisco IOS XR Software Route Processor Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS XR Software Route Processor Denial of Service Vulnerability The vulnerability only exists on Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR) Route Switch Processor (RSP440) and Cisco Carrier Routing System (CRS) Performance Route Processor (PRP). The vulnerability is a result of improper handling of crafted packets and could cause the route processor, which processes the packets, to be unable to transmit packets to the fabric. Vulnerable Products This vulnerability affects IOS XR Software version 4.2.0 [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/CH6GJ6bHrbw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/06/may-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/06/06/may-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to create self-signed certificates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/ONitOr42LmI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/25/how-to-create-self-signed-certificates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PKI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description>A digital certificate or identity certificate is an electronic document which uses a digital signature to bind a public key with an identity, information such as the name of a person or an organization, their address, and so forth. The certificate can be used to verify that a public key belongs to an individual. In a typical public key infrastructure (PKI) scheme, the signature will be of a certificate authority (CA). However, there are situations where it is not possible use a CA, so the only solutions is to use a self-signed certificate, an identity certificate that is signed by [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/ONitOr42LmI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/25/how-to-create-self-signed-certificates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/25/how-to-create-self-signed-certificates/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2012: one Cisco vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/WV1bGpXwskA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/03/april-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebEx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published one important vulnerability advisory: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in the Cisco WebEx Player Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in the Cisco WebEx Player The Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player contains three buffer overflow vulnerabilities. In some cases, exploitation of the vulnerabilities could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with the privileges of a targeted user. Vulnerable Products The vulnerabilities disclosed in this advisory affect the Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player. The following client builds of Cisco WebEx Business Suite (WBS 27) are affected by at least [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/WV1bGpXwskA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/03/april-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/05/03/april-2012-one-cisco-vulnerability/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Networking Academy NetRiders competitions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/X2ONGxzuDh8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/20/cisco-networking-academy-netriders-competitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetRiders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=977</guid>
		<description>NetRiders competitions provide students with hands-on practice and experience in a competitive environment, a chance to test their skills and recognize their weaknesses, showcase their knowledge, and create interactive networking skills as well as new friendships across the world. And for Instructors, this is a great opportunity to lead students and showcase teaching skills as well. Organized by Cisco, these competitions are a great opportunity for Networking Academy students to learn valuable Networking/IT skills through a series of online exams and simulation activities using Cisco Packet Tracer. Competitions are offered for students currently or recently enrolled in a Cisco Networking [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/X2ONGxzuDh8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/20/cisco-networking-academy-netriders-competitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/20/cisco-networking-academy-netriders-competitions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Unicast flooding due to asymmetric routing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/Y1VHnbOVEgU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/15/unicast-flooding-due-to-asymmetric-routing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asymmetric routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flooding attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unicast flooding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=953</guid>
		<description>Asymmetric routing is a situation where a packet traverses from a source to a destination in one path and takes a different path when it returns to the source. This is commonly seen in Layer-3 routed networks, for instance on Internet. Asymmetric routing is not a problem by itself, but will cause problems when Network Address Translation (NAT) or firewalls are used in the routed path. For example, in firewalls, state information is built when the packets flow from a higher security domain to a lower security domain. The firewall will be an exit point from one security domain to [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/Y1VHnbOVEgU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/15/unicast-flooding-due-to-asymmetric-routing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/15/unicast-flooding-due-to-asymmetric-routing/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2012: twelve Cisco vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/PAe5BdobV3k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/02/march-2012-twelve-cisco-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=950</guid>
		<description>The Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has published twelve important vulnerability advisories: Cisco IOS Software Reverse SSH Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software RSVP Denial of Service Vulnerability Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Software Traffic Optimization Features Cisco IOS Software Multicast Source Discovery Protocol Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Network Address Translation Vulnerability Cisco IOS Internet Key Exchange Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Smart Install Denial of Service Vulnerability Cisco IOS Software Command Authorization Bypass Cisco IOS Software Zone-Based Firewall Vulnerabilities Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA Services Module Cisco [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/PAe5BdobV3k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/02/march-2012-twelve-cisco-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/04/02/march-2012-twelve-cisco-vulnerabilities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to perform SSH RSA User Authentication</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ciscozine/~3/4JxA6FJj07U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/03/27/how-to-perform-ssh-rsa-user-authentication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure a router]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=943</guid>
		<description>Cisco IOS SSH Version 2 (SSHv2) supports keyboard-interactive and password-based authentication methods. The SSHv2 Enhancements for RSA Keys feature also supports RSA-based public key authentication for the client and the server. RSA based user authentication uses a private/public key pair associated with each user for authentication. The user must generate a private/public key pair on the client and configure a public key on the Cisco IOS SSH server to complete the authentication. An SSH user trying to establish the credentials provides an encrypted signature using the private key. The signature and the user&amp;#8217;s public key are sent to the SSH [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ciscozine/~4/4JxA6FJj07U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/03/27/how-to-perform-ssh-rsa-user-authentication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ciscozine.com/2012/03/27/how-to-perform-ssh-rsa-user-authentication/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
