Citizenery-MNCourts

Minnesota

State

Minnesota District 4

Congress

Minnesota State Senate District 64

State Legislative (Upper)

Minnesota House of Representatives District 64A

State Legislative (Lower)

Ramsey

County

Saint Paul Public Schools

School District

St. Paul

City

Minnesota Supreme Court

Judicial District

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Judicial District

Minnesota Second Judicial District

Judicial District

Minnesota Problem-Solving Courts

Judicial District

Minnesota Tax Court

Judicial District

Minnesota Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals

Judicial District

Ramsey County Commission District 4

Local Subdivision

https://www.twincities.com/2019/10/16/supreme-court-decision-on-st-paul-trash-lawsuit-in-a-nutshell/?utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Supreme+Court+decision+on+St.+Paul+Trash+lawsuit%2c+in+a+nutshell&utm_campaign=stpaul-morning-report&utm_content=manual

St. Paul City Council Ward 2

Local Subdivision

TrashContractcontraryto CommerceRights of Citizens VOTENO SAVEOUR CHARTER

2019-10-17T07:34:00.001-07:00

The court said the $27 million-per-year contract would remain intact, as would all of its associated costs and obligations. However, the city may have to do some legal scrambling to create new ordinances around billing and enforcement.

Bottom line: St. Paul is still on the hook for $27 million to the trash haulers next year.

JusticeGilda,Lillhaugh,Chutxx,Hudson,Anderson etal

New Questions How can the City now set the Rates for Trash Hauling File #: Ord 19-67 Version: 1 Name: Type: Ordinance Status: Second Reading In control: City Council Final action: Title: Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020. Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen Date Name District Opinion Comment Action 10/17/2019 10:24 AM CandidateSharonAnderson Against For years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.com therefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrust

Ord 19-67

Ordinance

Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.

Not available

Video

A19-0916        Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.
Ramsey County.
            1.   A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection.
            2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.
            Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.
vs.
https://www.stpaul.gov/file/documents/media-root/final-signed-contract

Saint Paul Logo

15 Kellogg Blvd. West | Saint Paul, MN 55102 | General Information: 651-266-8989

On Oct 16, 2019, at 9:52 AM, SharonQuiTamAnderson <sharon4anderson@aol.com> wrote:

http://depos-stpaul.blogspot.com Trust Fund Cash Cow4Lawyers.

https://sharon4council.blogspot.com/2008/05/sharons-default-judgments-v-city-st.html

The agency’s powers are subordinate to the Minnesota and US constitution and Minnesota law defines; for legal purposes in determinations of fact and law; acceptable interpretations of words in statutes:

645. Statutes, Construction

Wed.16Oct.2019

to the above named Watching KSTP channel 5 re Trash

  Candidate Sharon  http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

apparantly heard wrong that City was setting the Rates for Trash Haulers

called 651-266-8560 Mayor 266-8510

Can't find on legistar the Citys Rate Setting on this Trash Issue

Affiant further State and Allege

How can the City St. Paul,MN set the Rates 1983 up to the present

for the NonProfit District Heating,

Then apparantly the City maybe setting the Rates via Illegal Contract for the 6 or 7 Trash Haulers all for Profit. Interfering with Citizens Rights to Commerce for themselves.

ON MOTHERS GRAVE 1984, Sharon Council Candidate

both thrown in Jail,  http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

http://tacky-journalism.blogspot.com

My Mother Bernica A. Peterson ran for Mayor exposing the Tax Exempt Status of District Energy/heating, Coal Producing, Polluting the Downtown Air



City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/2/2019 at 3:30 PM

St. Paul trash vote weighs on upcoming City Council election

St. Paul trash vote weighs on upcoming City Council election | KSTP.com

The ordinance up for vote only outlines the rules for the trash program. Mayor Melvin Carter has said voting it down will not get rid of the system entirely.

It's been about seven weeks since the Supreme Court upheld the decision to put it on the ballot.

The court’s rationale is expected to be released on Wednesday.

RES PH 19-294 1 45 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the request of District Energy St. Paul, Inc. to amend District Heating rates for fiscal year 2020. Not available Video

RES PH 19-293 1 46 Resolution-Public Hearing Approving the request of District Energy St. Paul, Inc. to amend District Cooling rates for fiscal year 2020. Not available Video

S 19-1597 1 11 Excessive/Abatement Services May 22 to June 21, 2019 Resolution Approving the

RE City’s cost

City of Saint Paul - File #: RLH AR 19-91

Details

Reports

File #: RLH AR 19-91    Version:    Name: Excessive or Abatement Service Feb 20 to Mar 21, 2019

Type: Resolution LH Assessment Roll Status: Passed

In control: City Council

Final action: 9/18/2019

Title: Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during February 20 to March 21, 2019. (File No. J1911E, Assessment No. 198318)

Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen

Ward: Special Tax Assessments

Attachments: 1. Assessment Roll J1911E Mailing 7.16.2019

Related files: RES 19-1066, RLH TA 19-618, RLH TA 19-640, RLH TA 19-639, RLH TA 19-624, RLH TA 19-697, RLH TA 19-600, RLH TA 19-645, RLH TA 19-684

History (3)

Text

Public Comments (1)

Add New Comment

1 record

Group

Export

Date Name District Opinion Comment Action

9/17/2019 5:05 PM CandidateSharonAndersonWard2 Against Use of ***essments without decending to particulars then placing Liens on Propertys is Anti-Trust, Constitutionality of Consent Agenda http://sharon4council.blogspot.com probably 88 propertys involved Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka 2nd Husband Mike Hahm Dirctor Parks and Rec Conflicts,Ponzi Revenue Raising Schemne to Steal Propertys without Quiet Titles, Marketable and Valid Complaints Naming Who,What and When DSI Inspectors?

zzz

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com   http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch

SharonsObjectionCouncilAgendaWed182019AmysFundraiser7HeatherPlSt.Paul

2019-09-18T12:42:00.001-07:00

Subject: Check out City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 9/18/2019 at 3:30 PM

Wed 18Sept2019

To the Aboved Named; Council,Candidates,City,County Attorneys enbanc;

Sharons Objections for decades must tract on the Graves

of Tenants in Common Sharons Legal Homestead

1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN

TAKEN 4 8THOUS TAXES WHICH WERE PAID, NO mortgage

MINNESOTA, City St. Paul, City Mpls, Sanctuarys

taking Revenue from Homegrown Citizenery and

granting preferiental disparate treatment of illegal

immigrants. https://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com/

Affiant Candidate Ward 2 Sharon Anderson , Donald Trump Republican, apparantly the Dark City St. Paul,MN has sold their Soul in their personal and official capacitys by their Questionable Endorsements of Muslin Keith Ellison use of the Quran thereby forcing Sharia Law on the Soverign Homegrown Citizenery,

use of the Consent Agenda to steam roll Garbarge,Trash propertys.

use of Leg. Hearing Officer Marcia Mormond to have hearings

perhaps of all 6 thousand Trash Objectorshttp://saintpaultrash.com/

Vote

November 5, 2019 -- Referendum Ballot Question

Should Ordinance ORD 18-39, entitled

ISSUES OF OBJECTIONS

a. Raising Revenue on the Backs of the Propertys Owners,

creating Propertys as Debtors,

i. Excessive Inspections without marketable,Quiet Titles,names of DSI inspectors. etc.

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

Gives Notice of Objections to

SR 19-98

Refugee Resettlement Agencies

Staff Report

Presentation by representatives of the Refugee Resettlement Agencies of Minnesota regarding the 2020 “Presidential Determination” for refugee resettlement.

City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 9/18/2019 at 3:30 PM

RES 19-1559

Mogadishu Sister City resolution amendment

Resolution

Amending RES 19-800 formalizing a Sister City agreement between the City of Mogadishu and City of Saint Paul to include the Somali American Peace Council.

RES 19-1437

Resolution

Acknowledging receipt of District Energy St. Paul, Inc. notice of rate increase as of October 1, 2019, and directing the Office of Financial Services, the City Attorney’s Office, and City Council Operations to review and analyze the rate changes.

Years ago

1983 Challenge Tax exempt up to 2019

Secret Meeting with Council without Findings of Facts or Conclusions

.ROW ASSESSMENTS

similar to

also

Items Garbage Bills 6 thro 17

see Eric Lein Video at the Wed. 11Sept2019

113 RLH AR 19-74 Ratifying the assessment for the City's cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)

Not sure what propertys Lein Family has altho apparantly 114 units?

City of Saint Paul - File #: RLH AR 19-74

Resolution LH Assessment Roll

Status:

Passed

In control:

City Council

Final action:

9/11/2019

Title:

Ratifying the assessment for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019. (File No. CG1902A1, Assessment No. 190101)

Sponsors:

Amy Brendmoen

Attachments:

1. Assessment Roll CG1902A1 Mailing 6.25.2019

Add New Comment

Date	Name	Opinion	Comment
9/17/2019 5:17 PM	CandidateSharonAndersonWard2	Against	Shocking Ignorance of City Council Enbanc Mr.Leins testimony transposed,embedded to http://sharon4council.blogspot.com Jane Prince also a Lawyer stated to Mr Lein on the advise of Cousel have to approve ***essments even tho Prince agreed that something has to be done with Sharing,Billings etc. Mr Lein stated Constitutional Questions unabated by Council and their Lawyer Rachel Tierney
9/11/2019 11:05 AM	Eric Lein (#3 of 3)	Against	/// COURT RULING. On August 22, 2019, the MN Supreme Court overruled the City’s claim and decided that the Petition for a referendum is NOT preempted by MN Statutes, is NOT an unconstitutional interference, and does NOT conflict with state public policy. /// THEREFORE: The referendum is on the ballot, AND customers are owed refunds plus compensation. /// PLEASE lay over, cancel, and/or withdraw RLH-AR-19-74, RLH-AR-19-86, and all other azsessments for the City’s cost of providing Collection of Delinquent Garbage Bills for services during January to March 2019.
9/11/2019 11:04 AM	Eric Lein (#2 of 3)	Against	/// PETITION IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT. On November 14, 2018, RES 18-1922 was adopted, “Finding the Petition for a referendum of ORD 18-39 is legally sufficient….” HOWEVER, in an attempt to bypazs the Charter’s longstanding requirements, the City Council: (1) refused to suspend ORD 18-39, and (2) refused to place ORD 18-39 on the ballot, claiming (in error) that, “…the subject matter of the Petition is preempted by Minnesota Statutes §§ 443.28 and 115A.94, is an unconstitutional interference with the Agreement between the City and the Consortium, and conflicts with state public policy…”
9/11/2019 11:02 AM	Eric Lein (#1 of 3)	Against	?? PAYMENT DUE TO CUSTOMERS. Trash collection fees and charges that accrued after November 14, 2018, have been and continue to be billed and enforced in error. Customers forced to pay for service they do not want should receive: (1) refunds; and (2) compensation for time spent disputing invalid charges. ?? CITY CHARTER Sec. 8.05 requires that: “Any ordinance…upon which a petition is filed…shall be suspended in its operation as soon as the petition is found sufficient. If the ordinance…is not thereafter entirely repealed, it shall be placed on the ballot at the next election…”

9/17/2019 5:05 PM

CandidateSharonAndersonWard2

Against

Use of ***essments without decending to particulars then placing Liens on Propertys is Anti-Trust, Constitutionality of Consent Agenda http://sharon4council.blogspot.comprobably 88 propertys involved Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka 2nd Husband Mike Hahm Dirctor Parks and Rec Conflicts,Ponzi Revenue Raising Schemne to Steal Propertys without Quiet Titles, Marketable and Valid Complaints Naming Who,What and When DSI Inspectors?

RLH A

9/17/2019 5:05 PM

CandidateSharonAndersonWard2

Against

Use of ***essments without decending to particulars then placing Liens on Propertys is Anti-Trust, Constitutionality of Consent Agenda http://sharon4council.blogspot.com probably 88 propertys involved Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka 2nd Husband Mike Hahm Dirctor Parks and Rec Conflicts,Ponzi Revenue Raising Schemne to Steal Propertys without Quiet Titles, Marketable and Valid Complaints Naming Who,What and When DSI Inspectors?

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch
R 19-91

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Sharon has no problem with Amys Fundraiser, as 7 Heather pl is fully Homestead

9 bedrooms, 2 unrelated persons, as owners, both lawyers,
Magner v. Gallagher (10-1032) | LII Supreme Court Bulletin | LII / Legal Information Institutedroom with 2 unrelated lawyers. contrary to the Secret Deals by Tom Perez in the

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed in part, stating that Gallagher’s disparate impact theory presented a valid FHA claim. The Eighth Circuit applied a three-step burden-shifting test to the disparate impact claim, and found on the first step that Gallagher had satisfied its burden: Gallagher provided sufficient evidence to establish that the City’s housing code, while facially neutral, had reduced low-cost housing, resulting in a

Sharons Dis

Schaaf v. Trane U.S., Inc.

District of Minnesota, mnd-0:2012-cv-02465

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment {{11}} is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART as follows: Count 1: Disability Discrimination in Violation of the MHRA, and Count 3: Violations of the FMLA are DISMISSED, and Count 2: Age Discrimination in Violation of the MHRA, REMAINS. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/21/14.

tom perez dnc - Google Searchally bad but for

Tracking amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Jeff Neske aka Mrs. Mike Hahm

Fundraiser owners are Lawyers Halunen and Duddingston interesting Case signed off by Federal Judge Michael Davis

Wonder if these Lawyers owner of 7 Heather Pl St. Paul are gay and if the Judge knew they live together a
.s Halunen represented Plt susan Schaff and Duddingston rep Trane US inc.?

CASE 0:12-cv-02465-MJD-FLN Document 29 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 48

SUSAN SCHAAF

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM

OF LAW & ORDER

Civil File No.

12-2465 (MJD/

FLN

)

TRANE U.S., INC.,

Defendant.

Clayton D. Halunen, Barbara Jean Felt, and Ross D. Stadheim, Halunen &

Associates, Counsel for Plaintiff.

David J. Duddleston and Sara G. Sidwell, Jackson Lewis P.C.

, Counsel for

Defendant

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment. [Docket No. 11] The Court heard o

ral argument

November 14,

2013. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants in part and denies in part

Defendant’s motion.

II.

BACKGROUND

Fact

ual Background

CASE 0:12-cv-02465-MJD-FLN Document 29 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 48

Schaaf v. Trane U.S., Inc.: MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment {{11}} is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART as follows: Count 1: Disability Discrimination in Violation of the MHRA, and Count 3: Violations of the FMLA are DISMISSED, and Count 2: Age Discrimination in Violation of the MHRA, REMAINS. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/21/14.

at 7 Heather Pl St. Paul,MN
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN

	Parcel ID	Owner	Property Address
	012823320280	CLAYTON HALUNEN DAVID DUDDINGSTON	7 HEATHER PL

Tax Classification	1A-Residential Homestead

Amy Brendmoen for Saint Paul City Council, Ward 5 updated the event cover photo in Fundraiser and Rally for Brendmoen 10/3.

September 12 at 10:05 AM ·

Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com

http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/

http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=email

http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pd

http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.html

claimer;

Excessive or Abatement Service Feb 20 to Mar 21, 2019

Resolution LH Assessment Roll

Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during February 20 to March 21, 2019. (File No. J1911E, Assessment No. 198318)

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch

The Greatest Welfare Fraud in Minnesota History - Investigate Now!

2019-09-04T03:43:00.001-07:00

CandidateWard2SharonAndersonConstitutionalityConsentAgenda,SeparationPowersRICODismissedFedJudgeMichaelDavis

2019-09-02T11:15:00.001-07:00

sschmickle@minnpost.com
Sent: 9/2/2019 12:58:43 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Sharon4CouncilConstitutionalChallengeConsentAgenda's

Labor Day Mon 2Sept2019

To Above Named;Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates 2007

Affiant Widow,Whistleblower,White Woman must before Affiant re Penalty of Perjury and

before I kick the Bucket MUST expose Corruption by City,County,Complicit with

Courts and Carter Family. Influence of Muslim forcing Sharia Law.

ISSUES

CONSTITUTIONALITY Consent Agenda's,COMPLICITY,Carter,Council,Courts

HOUSING TRUSTS DESTROYED VIA LAWYERS
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court

TOM PEREZ,DAVID LILLHAUG,NOW

Justice,Federal Judge DFL Michael Davis

Who must not and could not Terminate a RICO CASE,

with Crimes, against humanity, without Jury Trial etc.

Please note DARK DFL Davis Black Judge also swore in

Muslim Keith Ellison now MNAG on the Quoran.

Minnesota District Court
Judge:	Michael J Davis
Referred:	Steven E Rau
Case #:	0:04-cv-02632
Nature of Suit	470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause	18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Case Filed:	May 05, 2004
Re-opened:	Nov 30, 2010
Terminated:	Jul 18, 2017

GPO Dec 18 2008
ORDER granting 198 Motion for Summary Judgment., IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 198 in Civil No. 04-2632, Docket No. 173 in Civil No. 05-461, and Docket No. 166 in Civil No. 05-1348] are GRANTED. 2. All Counts in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. 3. Counts VI in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they are based on the right to freedom from the taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Count VIII in Civil No. 05-1348 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. Except as stated in paragraphs 2-4, all remaining claims in Civil Nos. 04 2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 18, 2008. (slf) Modified text on 12/19/2008 (jdf).

Specifically Mayor Melvin Carter Son of Toni Carter Ramsey Co. Commissioner. City Council enbanc, Media,Government etal.

COUNT I CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE CITY AGENDA'S ON A WEEKLY BASIS
Saint Paul, Minnesota | The most livable city in America

Current version Agenda Wed.4Sept2019

RES 19-1427 Version: 1

Name:

Excessive/Abatement Service April 22 to May 21, 2019

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Agenda Ready

In control:

City Council

Final action:

Title:

Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during April 22 to May 21, 2019, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for October 1, 2019 and City Council public hearing for January 15, 2020 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J2002E, Assessment No. 208301)

Sponsors:

Amy Brendmoen

Attachments:

1. Report of Completion J2002E, 2. Assessment Roll J2002E

Date	Name	District	Opinion	Comment	Action
9/1/2019 12:26 PM	CandidateSharonAndersonWard2		Against	Stale Dated Inspections Delayed without Valid Complaints or DSI Inspectors name on each and every property usually 80 parcels http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.comConstitutional Challegene that Council enbanc has illegally delegated their Authority/Jurisdiction to Marcia Mormond leg.hearing Officer, City must be Audited by State and Federal Officials

In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007 Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12 th ,2007 public hearing Aug.15 th ,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey Please not 2006 and 2007 Citys Theft of Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys, unabated 4 over 13 yrs is Bizzare.
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocatesf Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Ass
.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053

COUNT II Abuse of Office,Anti-Trust,Deceptive Trade,Disparity.

Melvin served on the Saint Paul City Council from 2008 to 2013, serving as the vice chair of the Council . Ward 1

Fully aware of the Dirty DFL Deals of Current Nat.Chair Tom Perez complicit with

Lawyer David Lillhaug, current Justice, dying of Throat Cancer, Parkinson
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice

Count III HUD Records Nov13th2012
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch

Sicko-City StPaul

Sharon4Council

Sharon4Council: Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. Paul

https://ademocracy.blogspot.com/2008/09/saint-paul-federal-fair-housing_5101.html

Sep 7, 2008 - Saint Paul/ Federal Fair Housing Lawsuits, Meet Victim Mark E. Meysembourg ... Frank J. Steinhauser, III, et aI., Plaintiffs, v. City of St. Paul, et aI., ... My last residence in Minnesota was at 772 East Cook, in Saint Paul where I .... charged. 15. Between 2002 and 2004, the City claimed it was applying its higher ..

CONCLUSION used again Labor Day Mon.2Sept2019

13 years later Forensic Files

THEREFORE;

WE THE PEOPLE OF USA, MINNESOTA, HOMEGROWN

MUST BRING TO THE BAR OF PUBLIC OPINION

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Abolish City st.Paul Consent Agenda, legislative branch, delegating Jurisdiction/authority, started by DSI Inspectors

in Sharons and Lennys case ED SMITH, Executive Branch.

Reinstate Steinhausers RICO CLAIMS and Sharons Defaults

now in the Millions.

There is a pressing need to relieve the Appellant in this action of further official harassment by issuing an injunction that bars further action by the agency against Appellee be stayed until the agency state in an appeals summary exactly what issues it has with Appellant’s property. Appellant reasonably believes that Respondent’s vague position and refusal to state any specific facts, is indicative that the actions of the respondents are for the purpose of violating Appellant’s rights of privacy and to harass and retaliate against the Appellant.

April 18, 2006 _/s/ ECF-P165913 sa1299__________________________

Mrs. Sharon Anderson, Appellant-Relator-Removant

697 Surrey, St. Paul, MM V: 651 776 5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

etermined, at a hearing, as the agency refuses to state these issues in an appeal summary before hearing.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

2020CityBudgetOverlayChallengebyHoeschlerRes29-88,19-206

2019-08-27T11:57:00.000-07:00

Tues 27Aug2019

To the above Named,Candidates,Media et al Webmaster keeps changing legislator.

Also at http://taxthemax.blogspot.com Talk about FB Control, deleting Candidates Post as Against Community Standards.

DFL Nat.Party Tom Perez,former VC Keith Ellison current VC Ken Martin

are beholden to George Soros, heavily invested in MN Politics and City St. Paul,

Companies Owned By George Soros In The United States And Abroad - The Daily Trump News

Please take Legal Notice;

Affiant re Penalty of Perjury and as Trump Republican Candidate Sharon Anderson Ward 2 from her Legal Domicile HS at 1058 Summit Ave St. Paul,MN

hereby gives to the Entire DFL Council enbanc and Notice to Muslin/Asian Mitra J Nelson admitted Bi sexual, to Withdraw the Overlay Issues, until Legal Opinion is given by City Attorney Lindsey Olson, County Attorney John Choi and State AG Keith Ellison, Mitra's former Boss.
Sharon4Council also at fairstreetsstpaul.org

PEARLY GATES ARE PEEKING AT SHARON THRO THE WINDOW OF LIFE.

ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON AND MURDER OF 2ND HUSBAND

CPL JAMES ANDERSON SILVER STAR MARINE 21SEPT2000

SHARON LOYAL TRUMP REPUBLICAN,LAURA LOOMER FAN

HEREBY STATE AND ALLEGE

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 3;30AgendaWed.28Aug19

NOTICE to all Council who use Deceptive Trade Practices via

Weekly Consent Agenda in Excessive Inspections,Vacant Buildings,

Aug 24, 2016 - MN Supreme Court: St. Paul 'assessments' are really taxes ... Attorney Jack Hoeschler, who took the case against the city, said the key test of an ... ignoring these special assessments that appear on your tax statement below the line. ... Check out MPR News podcasts from the award-winning 74 Seconds to

Video Testimony Item60 19-207 scrool to time 126 at Wed.21Aug2019

http://stpaul.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=37&clip_id=3530&meta_id=456840

In Sharons Fight Excessive Inspections, hustled via Consent Agenda.

City does not learn re https://mailchi.mp/48101a249efb/november-5-citizens-will-vote-on-citys-trash-plan?e=6b88bf099b

or in Steinhausers Case's https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

HUD Proposes New Regulations to Clarify Disparate Impacts – Comments Due Oct. 18, 2019 | LAW OF THE LAND

HUD Proposes New Regulations to Clarify Disparate Impacts – Comments Due Oct. 18, 2019

On August 19, 2019 the Department of Housing and Urban Development published a proposed new regulation to among other things, “amend HUD’s interpretation of the Fair Housing Act’s disparate impact standard to better reflect the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.,…” See, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/19/2019-17542/huds-implementation-of-the-fair-housing-acts-disparate-impact-standard

SR 19-88 Discussion with the Saint Paul City Council on the 2020 Proposed Budget

at 6pm room 40 Wed.28Aug2019

FURTHER AFFIANT REQUESTING THE ENTIRE COUNCIL TO WITHDRAW THEIR SUPPORT OF MITRA,OMAR, CONTRARY TO USA CONSTITUTION,

Please note Mitra was sworn in via City Charter by Sherri Moore Clerk.

re Chris Holbrook Oath Lawsuit Attry Erik Kaardall.

then in the Trash debacle violates the Charter.

Please note re; Downtown Condo's how is their Trash handled

Bill Hosko

Really impressed with Hosko's Video, Web site http://hosko4ward2.org/

Chris Holbrook

Libertarian Party of Minnesota

Chair at Libertarian Party of Minnesota

21 mutual friends includi

year later http://sharon4council.blogspot.com Interesting Mitra J Nelson was Keith Ellisons aide, Further if Mitra does not pull Item from Agenda for Legal Opinion, or if the entire Council Deceptive Trade Practices, Ratify via Consent Agenda Title: Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Franklin Avenue from TH 280 to Pelham. (File No. MO1812, Assessment No. 185509)
Sponsors: Mitra Jalali Nelson
Attachments: 1. MO1812 Assessment Roll, 2. Hoeschler Letter

Date Name District Opinion Comment Action
8/23/2019 7:37 AM CandidateSharonAnderson Against When Legal opinions are requested, before any Ratifying **A*essmets are signed off by City Attorney and Mayor, Mitra former Clerk4 then Congressman Keith Ellison must know the state and federal Laws and must not act in Bad Faith such as this council did recent Trash Ballot https://mailchi.mp/…/november-5-citizens-will-vote-on-citys… Hoeschler letter must be acted on, Legal Opinions must be in writing for Public Scruinty.
RES PH 19-206 1 61 Ratifying Asmts - M&O Franklin from TH280 to Pelham Resolution-Public Hearing Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Franklin Avenue from TH 280 to Pelham. (File No. MO1812, Assessment No. 185509) Not available Video Vide

File #:

RES PH 19-206 Version:

Name:

Ratifying Asmts - M&O Franklin from TH280 to Pelham

Type:

Resolution-Public Hearing

Status:

For Discussion

In control:

City Council

Final action:

Title:

Ratifying the assessment for the 2018 Street Maintenance Service Program-Mill and Overlay: Franklin Avenue from TH 280 to Pelham. (File No. MO1812, Assessment No. 185509)

Sponsors:

Mitra Jalali Nelson

Attachments:

1. MO1812 Assessment Roll, 2. Hoeschler Letter, 3. 2nd Hoeschler Letter, 4. 3rd Hoeschler Letter, 5. Taghioff email - Mill & Overlay Executive Summary, 6. Hoeschler email - 190809 Millenacker decision

Add New Comment

Date	Name	District	Opinion	Comment	Action
8/23/2019 7:37 AM	CandidateSharonAnderson		Against	When Legal opinions are requested, before any Ratifying ***essmets are signed off by City Attorney and Mayor, Mitra former Clerk4 then Congressman Keith Ellison must know the state and federal Laws and must not act in Bad Faith such as this council did recent Trash Ballot https://mailchi.mp/48101a249efb/november-5-citizens-will-vote-on-citys-trash-plan?e=6b88bf099b Hoeschler letter must be acted on, Legal Opinions must be in writing for Public Scruinty.	-2

http://depos-stpaul.blogspot.com

(1) SharonspdfFiles

(2) 2020 budget discussion with the Saint Paul City Council

Featuring QUESTIONS is the use of Facebook pages in the City Budget

an Ethics Violation and Unfair Campaign Practice triggering Deceptive

Trade Issues. techincally Councils Facebook Support?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/211B

City of Saint Paul - Government

City · Saint Paul, Minnesota

The City of Saint Paul Facebook page expects commenters to behave appropriately and exchange opinions and ideas in a respectful climate. We will remove hateful, offensive, profane and off-topic comments, and may choose to block commenters who post them.

Saint Paul Councilmember Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5

Community

Represented by City Councilmember Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 is comprised of parts of the Como, North End, Payne-Phalen and Railroad

Saint Paul City Councilmember Chris Tolbert

Government Official · Saint Paul, Minnesota

Stay up to date on happenings in the Ward 3 neighborhood and around the City.
Send qu
Patty Hartmann Ward 3 - Homeestions to: Ward3@ci.stpaul.mn.us.

Ward 1 Office - Councilmember Dai Thao

Government Organization · Saint Paul, Minnesota

The official Facebook Page for the Ward 1 Council Office in the City of Saint Paul, represented by Councilmember Dai Thao.

Saint Paul City Councilmember Mitra Jalali Nelson - Ward 4

Government Official

Councilmember Mitra Jalali Nelson represents Ward 4 on the Saint Paul City Council. Please withdaw Pelham Overlay 19-206 until Legal Opinion is Given.

Councilmember Kassim Busuri

Politician · Saint Paul, Minnesota

I'm servant leaders whose passion comes from helping others achieve their goals of independence and prosperity.

Jane Prince, Saint Paul City Council, Ward 7

Government Official · Saint Paul, Minnesota

Highlights and happenings from St. Paul's Ward 7.

Councilmember Rebecca Noecker, St. Paul City Council Ward 2

Government Organization · Saint Paul, Minnesota

Councilmember Rebecca Noecker - Saint Paul, Ward 2

Bill Hosko

Really impressed with Hosko's Video, Web site http://hosko4ward2.org/

(3) Lindsay Ferris Martin St Paul City Council Ward 2 - Home can;t reach Helen Meyers Socialt

About the Venue

Saint Paul City Hall and Ramsey County Courthouse

Public & Government Service · 272 likes

Go to Page

xx
Code-Corruption

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

MNSCTrashHeaing JennissenvsBloomington12Jun19ClakvsStpaulA19-0916

2019-06-11T10:15:00.003-07:00

Update

Case Number:

Case Title:

Case Group:

Jurisdiction:

Status:

Case Type:

Date From:

To:

Case SubType:

Exclude Closed/Archived:

NOTE: The case numbering search and display has changed:In preparation for e-filing, which will begin in late 2014, the appellate courts are scanning all incoming paper filings. Incoming documents (from parties, court reporters, etc.) are not remotely accessible and cannot be viewed in P-MACS. These documents are currently displayed as “sealed” in P-MACS, but “sealed” refers to remote accessibility in most instances. Files and documents that are not fully viewable in P-MACS may be available for in-person viewing (if allowed by law) at the clerk's office in St. Paul (8-4:30, Monday-Friday). Outgoing orders and opinions are still viewable in P-MACS, unless public access is limited by rule, statute, or court order. For more information on a specific file, you can reach the clerk's office at (651) 291-5297.

Case numbers displayed in this system now include a hyphen after the year in which the appellate file was initiated.
To search for case #A11-0543, type in the entire case number (with a hyphen) or just 543 (which may return multiple pending cases, including A11-0543). Typing in A110543 will no longer return any results.

1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.

Search Results
Case Number	Jurisdiction	Short Title	Status	Type	SubType	Filing Date
A19-0916	Court of Appeals	Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.	Pre-Briefing	Civil	Other	06/13/2019
A19-0916	Supreme Court	Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Petitioners.	PFR	Civil	Other	06/13/2019

1 to 2 of 2 records are displayed.

Case Information
Case Number:	A19-0916	Filing Date:	06/13/2019
Jurisdiction:	Both	Status:	Pre-Briefing
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Oral
Classification:	Standard - Civil - Other
Short Title:	Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.
Full Title:	Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.
Summary:
Citation:	*

Supreme Court Information
Filing Date:	06/13/2019	Status:	Pre-Briefing
Short Title:	Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.	Hearing Type:	Oral

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status	PDF
Order - Grant Amicus (1 Order, 2 Entries)	Supreme Court	06/24/2019	Order	Grant Amicus	Final
Order - PAR - Grant (1 Order, 2 Entries)	Supreme Court	06/24/2019	Order	PFR - Grant	Final
Motion for Expedited Consideration of Petition for Accelerated Review	Supreme Court	06/22/2019	Motion	Expedite	Final
Notice - Attorney Appearance - Mark Bradford, David Camarotto and Kerri Nelson for Shari Moore, City of Saint Paul, Joseph Mansky	Court of Appeals	06/20/2019	Notice	Attorney Appearance	Final
Notice - Attorney Withdrawal - Sam Hanson, Scott Knudson, Scott Flaherty	Court of Appeals	06/18/2019	Notice	Attorney Withdrawal or Substitution	Final
Motion - Amicus - Leave to File Motion (League of Minnesota Cities)	Supreme Court	06/17/2019	Motion	Amicus - Leave to File Motion	Final
Motion - Amicus - Leave to File Motion - Susam L. Naughton o/b/o of League of Minnesota Cities	Court of Appeals	06/17/2019	Motion	Amicus - Leave to File Motion	Final
Petition - Accelerated Review	Supreme Court	06/13/2019	Petition	Accelerated Review	Final
Notice - Case Filing	Court of Appeals	06/13/2019	Notice	Case Filing	Final
Statement - Case - Appellant	Court of Appeals	06/13/2019	Statement	Case - Appellant	Final
Notice - Appeal - Case Filed; Order 5/30/19	Court of Appeals	06/13/2019	Notice	Appeal - Case Filed	Final

Chris Holbrook shared a link. also Court Files at

2 hrs http://mnstcourts.hs.llnwd.net/v1/mjbvid/case1_06_12_2019.mp4

Upcoming Supreme Court Livestreams
06/12/2019 9 a.m.- Jennissen, et al. v. City of Bloomington

Don't forget at this time tomorrow morning you can live stream the MN Supreme Court hearing oral arguments in the similar case being represented by Gregory Joseph for residents trash referendum vs the City of Bloomington. It should be very foretelling. http://www.mncourts.gov/SupremeCourt.aspx

MNCOURTS.GOV

Minnesota Judicial Branch - SupremeCourt

Currently, the Supreme Court reviews petitions in approximately 700 cases a year and accepts review in about 10-12 percent of cases from the…

JudgeKarenAsphaug sentenceSandraGrazziniRucki to jail for Parental Alienation

2018-04-08T16:10:00.001-07:00

David Rucki Buldging Eyeballs and his Fake Demeanor, now forcing Sandra Grazzini Rucki as a Felon

We the Public are now Victims in Family Court This Video mandates Judge Karen Asphaug Resign or be Removed. https://www.scribd.com/document/317237616/Administrative-Order-Membership2016

CourtsJudgeKarenAsphaugAbuse SandraGrazziniRucki2018

2018-04-08T14:00:00.000-07:00

Affiant Whistleblower Candidate Republican MNAG has Standing re ParenPatrie and also Injured Party 4 Public Education re Sandra Grazzini Rucki Heinous Abuse of Power via Court Judge Karen Asphaug appt on Scap Panel via Justice Lori Gildea

https://www.scribd.com/document/317237616/Administrative-Order-Membership2016

Disclaimer Affiant VA Widow Prennial Candidate for State AG exposing the Facts
now We The People have become Victims also Who are the Real Victims in this Heinous Rucki vs. Rucki The Children

https://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2018/04/medical-exam-points-minnesota-prison.html

(468) Sandra "Sam" Grazzini-Rucki in Her Own Words - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRfUv2Mq--k

Sharons Humble Attempt to Educate the Public on the Horrors of Minnesota Family Courts. Will update when i have more time and information.

Sat7Apr2018

Affiant Advocate further Candidatehttp://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 20 yrs ago Similarly situated re Sandra Grazzini Rucki Mother of 5 Children, exploited by an Abusive Husband David Rucki of Rucki Trucking,Warrants, Jailings by Corrupt MN Judiciary has Standing to expose the Corrupt Judiciary also in their Capacity of State Committment Panel

Horrors of Dakota Co James Backstrum in the Wrongful Death or Murder of Rev. MaryJane Duchene, Alice Krengel to Steal their Homesteads etc.

Contact Governor Scott Republican and DFL Mark Dayton

Executive Office of Governor Rick Scott
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-71 https://www.floridahasarighttoknow.myflorida.com/46

Email Governor Scott

Email Lt. Governor Lopez-Cantera

https://www.pcsoweb.com/whos-in-jail

Sharon Anderson

1 min ·

https://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/…/medical-exam-points-… Contact Governor Rick Scott Sheriff at https://www.pcsoweb.com/whos-in-jail
In the Matter of Sam Grazzini-Rucki et al her Physical Health Safety, Welfare.Mark Dayton let Sandra do her Unconstutional Warrants and Sentencing in Florida Michael Volpe cc media@eog.myflorida.com

Medical Exam Points the Minnesota Prison Corruption

A recent medical exam revealed that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki has several broken bones and torn ligaments, and much of the damage was either i...

THEEPROVOCATEUR.BLOGSPOT.COM

Love

Haha

Wow

Sad

Angry

Comment ON THE GRAVES OF OUR ;HERITAGE WE MOTHERS MUST PROTECT OUR CHILDREN

http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com\

About 37,700 results (0.42 seconds)

Sisters Disappear During Parents' Bitter Custody, Divorce Battle: Part 1

ABC News

6.7K views

2016/4/14 The Sandra Rucki Case after 20/20

SpeechlessMN

2.9K views

Search Results

Missing Sisters Appear During Interview on Local News Story: Part 2 ...

▶ 6:28

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytxfLUkaNHc

Apr 9, 2016 - Uploaded by ABC News

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki accuses her ex-husband David Rucki of being abusive to his family, which he denies ...

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Sentencing with impact statement. - YouTube

▶ 1:07:29

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRfUv2Mq--k

Mar 5, 2017 - Uploaded by SpeechlessMN

This video is the sentencing hearing of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki on Sept. 20, 2016 at the Dakota County Court ...

Lion News: Exclusive Video Of Samantha Rucki Testifying Her ...

▶ 4:29

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1KExt9vVBg

Sep 13, 2016 - Uploaded by ArrestAJudgeKit

Sandra Sue Grazzini Rucki v David Vickor Rucki - A16-1970 - Duration: 37:48. SpeechlessMN 1,057 ...

Sandra "Sam" Grazzini-Rucki in Her Own Words - YouTube

▶ 37:07

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjmpJLKbCog

Jan 24, 2018 - Uploaded by Michael Volpe

Sandra "Sam" Grazzini-Rucki describes a life on the run, courts ignoring sexual abuse, attempted murder, and ...

2016/4/14 The Sandra Rucki Case after 20/20 - YouTube

▶ 57:13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeNLgvMlpd4

Apr 14, 2016 - Uploaded by SpeechlessMN

Tim discusses the presentation on the 20/20 show, of the Minnesota Family Law case of Sandra Grazini-Rucki ...

PREDATOR IN POSSESSION - Ms. Grazzini Rucki is the Victim of Two ...

▶ 1:30:08

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YM19OG10mc

Jan 24, 2017 - Uploaded by Conscious Consumer Network

PREDATOR IN POSSESSION – A CCN MEDIA PRODUCTION 1/21/17 PRESENTS HOST – JILL JONES ...

20/20 Footprints in the Snow | Missing Minnesota Sisters [2020 FULL ...

▶ 15:39

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEZz6Wt8iPw

May 13, 2016 - Uploaded by 20/20 - Official Channel

Full Episode: http://goo.gl/jMYBy6 Part 3: http://goo.gl/Hge6HX Part 4: http://goo.gl/BPnEkR Part 5: http://goo.gl ...

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki maybe homeless, jobless, and penniless but ...

https://ppjg.me/.../sandra-grazzini-rucki-maybe-homeless-jobless-and-penniless-but-th...

Aug 28, 2017 - Sandra Grazzini and her ex-husband David Rucki owned a trucking company during their marriage which generated millions in income, but Judge David Knutson, who presided over much of their divorce, .... Minnesota Courts are out of touch with the Real World now on Videohttp://www.mncourts.gov.

Minnesota sisters whose mother was convicted of hiding them for over ...

abcnews.go.com/US/minnesota-sisters-mother-convicted-hiding-years.../story?id...

Mar 25, 2017 - The father of two Minnesota teenage girls, whose mother was accused of hiding them for more than two years, says his daughters are readjusting well to life at home with him and their other three siblings. David Rucki told ABC News “20/20” that the two teens, Gianna and Samantha Rucki, got to celebrate ...

Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE

http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf

Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogs bd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 | Scri Document's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson

www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

www.sharon4anderson.org

www.scotusblog.com

whist bleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26

S harons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0

http://www.givemelerty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money Launderin No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARDMACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g

2010-02-01T08:54:00.001-08:00

Sharon4 v. MNCourts Deceptive Trade

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Sharon4Anderson QuiTam Petition v. MN Courts_Magnuson_Toussaint enbanc

2010-01-31T07:12:00.000-08:00

CC: infor@judicialwatch.org, HumanEvents@HumanEventsOnline.com, fccinfo@fcc.gov, mc@whistleblowers.org, eagle@eagleforum.org
Sent: 1/31/2010 7:55:48 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Test MN Courts Deceptive Trade_Restraint Trade and Sec.3 HUD Reporting

31Jan10

AFFIDAVIT SHARON ANDERSON AKA SCARRELLA AKA PETERSON

WITH 30 YEARS STANDING VA WIDOW_WHISTLEBLOWER http://www.blogger.com/home

QUITAM_RELATOR_PETITION

To Whom it may Concern MN Chief Justice Eric Magnuson

Election by the People 2010 re: MS2.724MS 2.724

ChapterMS480 Courts

COUNT I

MS 485.01ClerksBond Clerk Fred Grittner: http://sharonswater.blogspot.com/

1988 File no.'s 495722 (Gearin) C6-88-859 (Huspeni) Grittner a Licensed Lawyer

Falsified Court Records, acting as a Judicial Officer in a "Patterened Enterprise" since 1988 up to and including 2010 apparantly acting in concort to embelleze over $110,000.00 of Sharons Equity in her Paid For Homestead at 1058 Summit Ave, St.Paul, MN. Forensic Files are Extensive.

MS 609.385 Treason

MN Appellate Court Enbanc: Specifically former St.Paul City Attorneys Harriet Lansing and Natilie Hudson. http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com/

Current Files 62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth) A09-2031(Toussaint)

http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/pubdocs/COA/Storage/ORA092031-1207.pdf

Dec.7th09 Affiants Full Compliance Forensic Files found at http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/ and http://www.sharon4anderson.org/ and http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/pubdocs/COA/Storage/ORA092031-0106.pdf

6Jan10 Order stating "Abandoned" if False,Misleading, Attempt to Coverup the 3 thousand Property Owners alleged 2008 Tax Delinquent, based on Deceptive Trade, Restraint of Trade, Anti-Trust, Criminal Violations of Hud Sec. 3 Mandates et al. http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/RamseyCoTax033009_230.pdf

,Good Faith to expose the Deceptive Trade Practices of the Minnesota System in its Entirety.

COUNT I I

http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/3631fin.php

The Heinous Denial of "Due Process" now over thirty years, must be addressed specifically in the City of St.Paul, County of Ramsey MN.

http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/mn-judge-edward-toussaint-a09-2031/

http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/section3/Sec3-Reporting-Guidance-cpd-final.pdf

MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

January 11, 2010 by sharon4anderson

Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM

OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT

RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION

MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031

Sun.10Jan10

Judge Profile To: Chief Judge Eward Toussaint

age 69 Minnesota Judicial Center
Phone: (651) 297-7650 http://us.mc522.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us

Sa Open Ltr Touss10 Jan10

ISSUES:

Pursuant to Ramsey 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog Dist.Crt. File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)

Appeal A09-2031 www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com

Affiant “takes” Issue with your “Orders” Please clarify “abandoned”

Sharon v. Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

Published now for Public Scrunity

COUNT I OATH OF OFFICE

Judicial Oath of Office Chapter 358

358 – SEALS, OATHS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

HAS CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT VIOLATED HIS OATH V. SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON?

Every judge of such municipal court, before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Washington, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of judge of the municipal court of the city of . . . . . . (naming such city) according to the best of my ability; and I do further certify that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of an organization that advocates, the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence.” The oath shall be filed in the office of the county auditor. He or she shall also give such bonds to the state and city for the faithful performance of his or her duties as may be by law or ordinance directed.

COUNT II 42USC sec.1983-86

Civil Rights of Widow_WhiteWoman_Whistleblower 42usc

Civil Rights Act

Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. … Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights …
www.defraudingamerica.com/civil_rights_act.html – Cached – Similar

in the “takings” of 91 Chrysler, denying “Transit”,Commerce by Theft, unabated by Black Police Chief John Harringon?

covert methodology of Diesel Therapy

a. “takings” Drivers License by Senile Judge Larry Cohen ,without Court Order and who’s 3rd Wife Kathleen Donnelly Cohen is VP of Comcast Cable Franchised by City St.Paul Mike Reardon with Relative Jack Reardon DSI Building Inspector giving rise to Appeal A09-2031 (Toussaint) Denial of Constutional Issue of

MS 429

COUNT 111 Constutional Challenge Rule 24.04

429 – LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

city attorney Judy Hanson

b. Theft of Sharons 91 Chrysler to St.Police Impound Lot,

legaleaglesharon.blogspot.com re: Manager Aaron Foster .

c. Diesel Therapy on the general public to force Bus Ridership and that Damm Light Rail, now “taking” busines US CODE: Title 18,1595. Civil remedy along University Ave.

MN 2nd District Court

COUNT IV INTERFERANCE WITH HEATLH CARE DIESEL THERAPY

Diesel Therapy – Google Search and to join with 62cv09-011693 Unallotment File with Affidavit of Prejudice against Kathleen Gearin in her offical and personal capacitys re: SCAP “taking” Homestead Credits on Disabled, SilverSTar Marine etc.

Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

WINDS – George Hansen, Di esel Therapy and Susan McDougal

JR-Shar-Homeless_17

ShaRICO_1992_22

COUNT V DUE PROCESS FOR 30 YEARS

AFFIANT HAS BEEN DENIED FOR 30 YEARS IN HER COMMERCE,PROPERTY,TRANSPORTATION ANSASC_1988_15 D MARRIAGE,CHILDREN DM-1399_23 RIGHTS

SharonsRealestate_34 FedCases_13

memorandum of case law’s

Click here: City of Minneapolis, et al., Respondents, vs. Steven F. Meldahl, Appellant. C6-99-1490, Court of Appeals Published

http://www.lufsky.blogspot.com/ http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/

WINDS – George Hansen, Diesel Therapy and Susan McDougal

Punitative,Compensatory,Tort Damages in the millions for 30 years of heinous, repugnant Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles.

When the Court wilful fail to implement pdf files and/or Read the Entire Records………..Pervase/Fatal Any all Bogus Judgments are therefore VACATED.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299

telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints – http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice – on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson’s Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

WOW !!! You Go Girl !!!

Blessings,

Bill
— On Sun, 1/10/10, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Subject: OPEN LETTR(Toussaint) A09-2031 DIESELTHERAPY TAKING DL AND CAR
To: edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askhomesteads@co.ramsey.mn.us, AskHumanServices@co.ramsey.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen-berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal-ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola@aol.com, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kenneth.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, margaret.egan@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elizabeth.davis@ci.stpaul.mn.us, trudy.moloney@ci.stpaul.mn.us, thomas.davenport@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mkib73@hotmail.com, tim@e-democracy.org, eva@evaformayor.com, Sharon4Mayor@aol.com, BillDahn4Mayor@aol.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob@calhouncompanies.com, will@willrossbach.com, aonealpha@yahoo.com, mayorlongrie@yahoo.com, jtstiles@gmail.com, FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com, COURTWATCHERS_OF_AMERICA@yahoogroups.com.luis
Cc: bruc0015@umn.edu, silha@tc.umn.edu, a_democracy@yahoo.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Sharia4Law@aol.com, curt.brown@startribune.com, webmaster@am1500.com, infor@judicialwatch.org, JURIST@law.pitt.edu, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, newsroom@mpr.org, newstips@wcco.com
Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM
OPEN LETTER TO CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD TOUSSAINT
RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION
MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031

MaryJaneDuchene v.KoriLand_WSt.Paul,MN

2010-01-13T08:48:00.000-08:00

West St. Paul, Minnesota, RE: Alleged Noise Violations
Calculator for determining amount sound diminishes with distance: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm.
Citation:	LINK
Long Form Complaint	LINK
Initial Motion to Dismiss	LINK
Motion to Vacate and Reverse	LINK
WARRANT	LINK
Continuance	LINK
MOTION TO DISMISS, November 25, 2009	LINK
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, PREJUDICE, December 09, 2009	LINK
MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING RELEASE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, December 16, 2009	LINK
REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT, JANUARY 11, 2010	LINK

http://www.ci.west-saint-paul.mn.us/index.asp?Type=B_LIST&SEC={5AB2A4C2-6052-4911-A F1B-3C51575DB80A}#{F9B67795-70B5-4335-B2BE-77C50FD85B54} "Lost/Found Pets If a pet has been found, and the pet has a license tag, call the West St. Paul Municipal Center at 651-552-4100. The City has a record of all licenses and owners. You can also inquire about lost or found pets by calling the petline at 651-322-2323."

MaryJaneDuchene RemovalFC Dakota Co 3441797

2010-01-13T05:09:00.000-08:00

From: DDAweb
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:40:34 -0600
To:
Subject: FC

United States District State of Minnesota

City of West St. Paul, Plaintiff, Notice of and Removal of Dakota County District Court Criminal Case on Grounds of Judicial Prejudice and Violations of
14th Amendment Due Process Rights.

VS.

Mary Jane Duchene, Defendant Federal Court File no.___________
Dakota County Citation no. 3-441797
Dakota County Court file: 19WS-CR-09-15734

TO: Dakota County District Court, Attorney for the City of West St. Paul

The undersigned removed this to US District Court BY VIRTUE OF 28 U.S.C. 1443;
28USC1443 - Google Search

"Any of the following ... criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court
may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States
for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending:

(1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of
such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of
citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction
thereof[.]

on the following grounds:

1) This Dakota County criminal action is observably a malicious prosecution by the plaintiffs in that action and the plaintiffs failed to comply with the legal process required by law and the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, by stating facts 5th,14th Amendments US Constitution - Google Searchwhich comprise a criminal action, in continuing prosecution, which is shown in the selected court documents attached hereto.

That established US Supreme Court requirements as to required
specificity of a criminal accusation, see. e.g. United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), US v Cruikshank,92US - Google Search quoted and affirmed in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 at 763-765, Russell v. US 39 US 749 - Google Search which in turn is cited with approval in State v. Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189 (Minn. App. 1986) . Gross,387 NW 2d 182 Minn App.1986 - Google Search

PDF]

State of Minnesota District Court County of Dakota First Judicial ...

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Oct 25, 2009 ... Gross, 387 N.W. 2d 182 at 189. (Minn. App. 1986). That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for distinct ...
www.angelfire.com/mn3/advocate6/2009dog/motionvacatereverse.pdf

That the right to a specific accusation including separate counts for
distinct offenses charged has been incorporated by the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. See: e.g. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 at 201 (1942), Cole v. Arkansas,333 US 196 - Google Search and Faretta v. California, 442 U.S. 806 at 818(1975). Faretta v. California - Google Search

The plaintiffs have tried to allege that a police officer, allegedly hear a barking dog noise at my property, from a distance of over 200 feet, when scientific evidence clearly shows it would be impossible to identify such a sound, or even hear it, from such a distance, because sound diminished by about 75% at a distance of 200 feet or sixty meters, SEE SOUND CALCULATOR:

http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-distance.htm.

The failure to withdraw the criminal complaint, AND INSTEAD RELENTLESSLY PURSUE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, shows the plaintiffs are relying on a failure of due process and fairness in the Dakota County Courts and there is obvioulsy the potential for progressively more insane criminal accusations to transpire in future because of this case.
2) The plaintiff have done this as part of a pattern of misconduct which has occurred over a period of more than fifteen years.
3) The defendant cannot get a fair trial in Dakota County, as detailed in the select Dakota county court documents attached hereto, as there has been a hostile history with the Dakota County.
Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified." [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Liteky v US 114 S.Ct.1147,1162 (1994) - Google Search

Judicial Disqualification

Feb 1, 2000 ... Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994). Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a ...
www.clr.org/Judicial-disqualification.html - Cached - Similar

Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 - Google Search(what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp 486 US847 - Google Search(Section 455(a) "is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.") ("Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. 455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.") .28USC 455 Judicial Code - Google Search

That Court also stated that Section 455(a) "requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that "It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice."
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the
appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
"Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of
recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that "We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed." Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his "appearance of partiality" which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an"appearance of partiality" and has possibly disqualified himself/ herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) US v. Sciuto 521 F.2d 842 - Google Search

("The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.").

State and Federal Due Process - Google Search

Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of "interference with interstate commerce". The judge has acted in the judge's personal capacity and not in the judge's judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone's next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge).
However some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to
non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an "appearance of partiality" and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states "disqualification is required" and that a judge "must be disqualified" under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts
without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

4) The defendant¹s First Amendment rights are also being abused by this action as this action appears to be retaliation by the City of West St. Paul Attorney, for speaking out on disability issues, via a web site, relevant to Alice Krengel, as the citation was issued one week after the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled against that City Attorney, and in favor of Ms. Krengel.
RELIEF REQUESTED

1. AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING THE CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL FROM CONTINUING THIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, AND CONTINUING TO SOLICIT AND ENGAGE IN DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS IN THIS ACTION.
2. DAMAGES (INCLUSIVE BUT NOT LIMITED TO ACTUAL, PUNITIVE, AND EXEMPLARY) FOR ENGAGING IN A LONG TERM PATTERN OF HARASSMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, FOR AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT.
January 11, 2010 Respectfully Submitted:
*
Mary Jane Duchene, BA, BS
1144 Ottawa Avenue
West St,. Paul, MN 55118
Fax: 651 457 4376
MariJaynDuchene@aol.com

http://www.angelfire.com/mn3advocate6/2009dog/wspnoise.html

Free Tim Kinley 62f196163(Cleary)

2010-01-07T10:17:00.000-08:00

http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

My Account

Feeds:: Posts; Comments

Tim Kinley 62F196163(Cleary)

January 7, 2010 by sharon4anderson Edit

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results lEGAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLICPlease be so informed of Tim Kinley’s Court Hearing 25Jan2010 _ 62f196163(Cleary) Please send Appellate and Federal File Case NO’s for Research, Anyone having trouble with any Judges Listed: Help make the Courts Accountable, PDF Files must be scanned in URL for Public Scrunity, Fair,Impartial Justice.

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search

Search Criteria: 62f196163

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-F1-96-000163	BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED] Box File [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239]	01/23/1996 Ramsey Family Main Cleary, Edward J.	Dissolution with Child Dormant

Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search

Case No. 62-F1-96-000163

BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239]

§
§
§
§
§
§

Case Type:	Dissolution with Child
Date Filed:	01/23/1996
Location:	Ramsey Family Main
Judicial Officer:	Cleary, Edward J.

Party Information

			Lead Attorneys
Intervenor	COUNTY OF RAMSEY ST PAUL, MN 55102

Petitioner	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128 Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, BARBARA A. OAKDALE, MN 55128 Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered	08/19/1967	DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained

Respondent	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109	05/26/1958	CLARK, JILL ELEANOR Retained

Events & Orders of the Court

DISPOSITIONS

12/10/1997

Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Converted Disposition:
	Related Participants: KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.

07/21/1998

Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)

Monetary Award (Status: Expired, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 07/21/1998, Docketed: 07/28/1998, 1:13 PM, Original Principal: $10,346.99)

05/20/2008

Closed at filing (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W.)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)

02/09/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)

Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Docketed: 03/25/2009, 8:54 AM, Original Principal: $32,403.68)

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

01/23/1996

Converted Filing Fee

01/23/1996

FLD-Case Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/23/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/16/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/23/1996

Converted Filing Fee

02/23/1996

CRP-Certificate of Representation (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/26/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/01/1996

Temporary Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Yanish, Jo Anne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/1996

RSI-Review for Scheduling Information (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/23/1996

RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/29/1996

NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/30/1996

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Yanish, Jo Anne M. )

05/30/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/30/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/04/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/14/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/21/1996

RSO-Review for Scheduling Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/28/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/17/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/19/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/1996

FSF-Family Scheduling Form (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/13/1996

CANCELED Scheduling Conference (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Administrator, Conference)

Other

08/20/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/20/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/28/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/09/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/25/1996

DRV-ADR Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/25/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/26/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

JAS-Judge Assignment (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )

11/18/1996

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/18/1996

Pre-trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/06/1996

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/03/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/06/1997

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/07/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/27/1997

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

02/18/1997

SPT-Schedule Pre-Trial (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/24/1997

CANCELED Pre-trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

05/05/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/12/1997

Pre-trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/13/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/03/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/24/1997

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/25/1997

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/28/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/15/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/18/1997

Court Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

08/19/1997

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/19/1997

CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

09/08/1997

Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

12/09/1997

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/09/1997

DCR-Decree (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/22/1997

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/09/1998

ARC-Archive (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/23/1998

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/13/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/13/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/27/1998

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/28/1998

CANCELED Hearing (2:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

05/15/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/20/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/21/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/22/1998

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/26/1998

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/21/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/28/1998

JDG-Entry of Judgment (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/31/1998

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/24/1998

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/19/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/26/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/11/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/16/1999

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

02/26/1999

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/30/1999

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Other

04/07/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/09/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/20/1999

Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Flinn, Charles A., Jr)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/17/1999

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/19/1999

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/01/2000

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/08/2000

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

06/08/2000

Hearing (1:15 PM) (Judicial Officer Frias, Luz)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

06/21/2000

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

06/22/2000

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

12/03/2001

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/08/2002

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

02/08/2002

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Flinn, Charles A., Jr )

02/25/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/04/2002

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/06/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/11/2002

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

03/11/2002

Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Smith, Joanne M.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/12/2002

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/15/2002

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

04/16/2002

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/22/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2002

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/04/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/05/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/12/2002

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/25/2002

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: Smith, Joanne M. )

07/02/2002

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

07/12/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/12/2002

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/12/2002

Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Wray, Tsippi)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/13/2002

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/13/2002

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Wray, Tsippi )

07/16/2002

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

07/18/2002

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/29/2002

DCS-Dismiss Child Support (Judicial Officer: Frias, Luz )

07/11/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/26/2003

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/26/2003

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/27/2003

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/27/2003

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

08/27/2003

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/09/2003

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other

12/01/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/02/2003

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/05/2003

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/12/2004

CANCELED Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Other

02/09/2004

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/17/2004

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/23/2004

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer DeCourcy, Michael T.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/15/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/19/2004

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

04/19/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2004

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/30/2004

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/06/2004

RAS-Reassignment (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/06/2004

UAG-Unassigned-Agreement (Judicial Officer: DeCourcy, Michael T. )

06/08/2004

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2004

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/16/2004

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

06/16/2004

Hearing (2:20 PM) (Judicial Officer Moriarity, Michael)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

07/08/2004

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

07/08/2004

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Moriarity, Michael )

08/09/2004

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/10/2004

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/15/2004

RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/09/2004

CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

12/29/2004

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/03/2005

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/06/2005

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

02/17/2005

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/17/2005

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/04/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/10/2005

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

03/23/2005

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/23/2005

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/18/2005

Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/09/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/10/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/16/2005

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

07/12/2005

CANCELED Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

08/08/2005

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

08/08/2005

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/2005

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/12/2005

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/16/2005

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/21/2005

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/07/2005

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/02/2005

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/15/2005

CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

11/18/2005

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/13/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/19/2006

Hearing (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

02/03/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

02/22/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

02/22/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/22/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/28/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

02/28/2006

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/27/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/27/2006

XPO-Expedited Process (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/28/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

03/28/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

03/28/2006

Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

04/07/2006

MCC-Motion for Correct (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/07/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/14/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/17/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/20/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/24/2006

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/24/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

NUL-Null Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/26/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Ronelle )

04/26/2006

Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Anderson, Ronelle)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

05/15/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2006

NOA-Notice of Appeal (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/05/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/15/2006

RVW-Case Status Review (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/22/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/08/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/10/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/24/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/30/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/13/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/13/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/15/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/15/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/16/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/17/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/17/2006

TSC-Transcript Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/27/2006

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

10/27/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/20/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

11/20/2006

POS-Proof of Service (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/11/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/13/2006

LTR-Letters (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/14/2006

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/14/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/18/2006

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/18/2006

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

12/19/2006

SUB-Submitted (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

12/19/2006

CANCELED Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

12/19/2006

Hearing (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Flynn, Mary H. C.)

Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred

01/02/2007

AJU-Adjudicated (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

01/02/2007

CLO-Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

01/02/2007

ORS-Child Support Order (Judicial Officer: Flynn, Mary H. C. )

01/16/2007

CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Magistrate, Child Support)

Other

02/02/2007

DOC-Document Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

04/03/2007

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

05/23/2007

SCH-Schedule Hearing (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2007

MTN-Motion Filed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

06/11/2007

OSC-Order to Show Cause (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/05/2007

NOT-Notice (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/11/2007

ORD-Order (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

07/16/2007

AFF-Affidavit (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

09/19/2007

Appellate Court Order

09/21/2007

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel

09/21/2007

Affidavit of Service

09/24/2007

Affidavit-Other

09/25/2007

Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

09/25/2007

Reset by Court to 09/25/2007

Result: Held

09/27/2007

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

10/22/2007

Findings and Order (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

10/30/2007

Notice of Filing of Order

11/06/2007

Motion and Affidavit

11/07/2007

CANCELED Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Other

11/16/2007

Appellate Court Order

11/20/2007

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )

12/11/2007

Other Document

12/21/2007

Order Discharging Guardian Ad Litem (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

12/24/2007

Notice of Case Filing

12/24/2007

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Finley,John T. , )

12/24/2007

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

12/24/2007

Motion

01/11/2008

Appellate Court Order

02/22/2008

Notice of Hearing

03/20/2008

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Anderson, Russell A. )

04/17/2008

Notice of Hearing

05/06/2008

Order to Show Cause Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Bastian, Gary W.)

Result: Held

05/12/2008

Notice of Case Filing

05/14/2008

Other Document

05/20/2008

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W. )

05/22/2008

Notice for Implementation of Cost of Living Adjustment

05/23/2008

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

06/03/2008

Notice of Case Assignment

06/12/2008

Notice to Remove (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )

06/26/2008

Certificate on Notice of Removal/Affidavit of Prejudice (Judicial Officer: Beddow, Earl F., Jr. )

06/26/2008

Notice of Case Assignment

07/09/2008

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

07/09/2008

Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

07/15/2008

Notice of Motion and Affidavit

07/28/2008

Converted Pending Activity (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding )

08/28/2008

Notice of Hearing

11/05/2008

Affidavit-Other

11/05/2008

Other Document

11/05/2008

Affidavit of Service

11/10/2008

Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

11/10/2008

Reset by Court to 11/10/2008

Result: Held

11/10/2008

Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

11/20/2008

Notice of Case Filing

11/20/2008

Correspondence

11/20/2008

Other Document

12/04/2008

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

12/04/2008

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

12/11/2008

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

01/13/2009

Notice of Hearing

02/02/2009

Affidavit-Other

02/02/2009

Affidavit of Service

02/03/2009

CANCELED Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Ostby, Elena L.)

Settled

02/03/2009

Reset by Court to 02/03/2009

02/09/2009

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/09/2009

Processed Judgment Entry

02/09/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

02/12/2009

Notice of Filing of Order

02/12/2009

Affidavit of Service

03/24/2009

Affidavit of Identification

03/25/2009

Processed Judgment Docketing

03/25/2009

Notice of Docketing of Judgment

04/14/2009

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

04/14/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

04/14/2009

Motion

04/15/2009

Notice of Case Filing

05/01/2009

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

05/13/2009

Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L. )

05/13/2009

Motion

05/13/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

05/22/2009

Appellate Court Order (Judicial Officer: Toussaint, Edward, Jr. )

06/12/2009

Notice of Motion and Motion

06/12/2009

Affidavit-Other

06/12/2009

Affidavit of Service

06/17/2009

Notice-Other

06/26/2009

Notice of Hearing

08/31/2009

Affidavit-Other

08/31/2009

Affidavit of Service

09/02/2009

Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel

09/02/2009

Correspondence

09/03/2009

Motion Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

07/02/2009	Reset by Court to 07/02/2009
07/02/2009	Reset by Court to 09/03/2009

Result: Held

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Other Document

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

09/15/2009

Warrant Issued

09/16/2009

Correspondence

09/16/2009

Affidavit of Service

09/29/2009

Notice of Filing of Order

09/29/2009

Affidavit of Service

10/07/2009

Correspondence

11/05/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Montgomery, Ann )

11/23/2009

Warrant Returned

11/25/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Cleary, Edward J. )

12/21/2009

Correspondence

12/21/2009

Notice of Appearance

12/21/2009

Motion

12/21/2009

Correspondence

12/24/2009

Notice-Other

01/25/2010

Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Cleary, Edward J.)

Financial Information



	Obligor KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
	Total Financial Assessment			235.00
	Total Payments and Credits			235.00
	Balance Due as of 01/07/2010			0.00

11/07/2007	Transaction Assessment			55.00
11/07/2007	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2007-01644	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(55.00)
07/15/2008	Transaction Assessment			55.00
07/15/2008	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2008-04419	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(55.00)
04/09/2009	Transaction Assessment			20.00
04/09/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-02614	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(20.00)
05/12/2009	Transaction Assessment			5.00
05/12/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-03566	KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.	(5.00)
12/24/2009	Transaction Assessment			100.00
12/24/2009	Mail Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-09142	CLARK, JILL ELEANOR	(100.00)



	Petitioner KINLEY, BARBARA A.
	Total Financial Assessment			10.00
	Total Payments and Credits			10.00
	Balance Due as of 01/07/2010			0.00

04/29/2009	Transaction Assessment			10.00
04/29/2009	Counter Payment	Receipt # FM62-2009-03207	KINLEY, BARBARA A.	(10.00)

FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search

Gearins Unallotment “Files”62cv09-11693_62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)

December 31, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Disclaimer Affiant demand pdf Forensic Files 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)AppealA09-2031(Toussaint) http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/

Pay Fines Online Fees Court Forms Find Court Calendars Access to Trial Court Records Appellate Court Records and Opinions Rule

–>

High-Profile and Multi-District Litigation Cases Ramsey Co. District Court pdf Files while http://www.mncourts.gov/ does not>
In this section:

Print Friendly Version

Text size:

Judicial Branch Home > 2nd Home > News / About Us > High-Profile and Multi-District Litigation Cases >

2009 Unallotment Litigation:

62-CV-09-11693:
Multiple Parties v. Governor of MN, et al

Documents

December 30, 2009
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order – Granted retroactive to 11/1/2009 – See Document
Amended Order – See Document

November 23, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document

November 20, 2009
Briefs – See Document
Affidavit – Other with Exhibits – See Document

November 17, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document

November 16, 2009
Plaintiffs Reply Memo in Support of TRO - See Document
Amended Class Action Complaint – See Document

November 12, 2009
Affidavit of Service – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits MO – See Document
Affidavit Other with Exhibits PR = See Document
Defendants Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss – See Document
Defendants Memo. in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for TRO – See Document
Defendants Certifcate of Representation – See Document

November 6, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Notice of Motion and Motion for Temproary Restraining Order See Document
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order See Document

November 3, 2009
Affidavit of Service - See Document
Summons and Complaint – See Document
Certificate of Representation and Parties See Document

Posted in Uncategorized 1 Comment »

Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031

December 26, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Flo rida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office Sue Dosal
(651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR

fiafea & firrea – Google Search

Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515 www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us

2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278

Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301

Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177

Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010

Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155

St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574

and all others as their interest appear.

FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES

IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA
A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) etal 62CV09-11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example
Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson’s
Informal Brief pdf Format

62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)SumJudg8Sept09 Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951
QuoWarranto A06 1150 30 Jun06

STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562 Plaintiffs
V.

http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Ramsey_Co_Tax_03-18-09_208.pdf

Page 53_697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al,
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs
www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson. Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1.
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and an appellate court’s review is unlimited. Accordingly when determining a question of law, the appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s interpretation of a statute. or Denial of MN Const.Art.X and Separation of Powers Art. III

MS 279 stating “lacked merit”
279 – DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

Affiants Answer/Cross 4 1/2 Million Dollars, overlooked,misapplied by Judge John Vandenorth
in a “Patterned Enterprise” of Judicial Fraud upon the Citizenery

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf July 5th,2007

2.
When construing a statute, a court should give words in common usage their natural and ordinary meaning. MS429.061
429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes Theft,Trespass,Treason is NOT IMPROVEMENT.

Sharon4Anderson v. City St.Paul taking 91 Chrysler – Google Search

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169

The fundamental rule to which all other rules are subordinate is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. When language is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction. An appellate court merely interprets the language as it appears; it is not free to speculate and cannot read into the statute language not readily found there.

MS 645.Canons of Construction Lower Court Vandenorth Treasonable Act’s

4.
If a city or county governing body has a two-thirds majority vote of its membership, it may modify a recommendation from its planning commission without first returning the proposal to the commission.
or in MN Issues of MS609.43 Misconduct of Public Officials to exploit the Seniors,Elderly,Vunerable Homeowners
in their Bizzare Taxing Methods of Illegal Fees/Assessments by Theft,Trespass,Treason? in this RICO Case for over 25 years…..re: C6-88-859 (Doris Huspeni) with Clerk Chris Coleman, now City St.Paul Mayor.

www.sharonswater.blogspot.com

5.
Under the facts of this case, the Board of County Commissioners’ alleged Administrative Hearing without “due process” or Civil/Criminal S&C triggering Constitutional Challenge of Jurisdiction/Authority of Judge John Vandenorth File 62cv09-1163,amendment’s published 2008 Tax Delinquency’s was a legislative action.

Quitam Relator Sharon4Anderson is the only homeowner to challenge out of 3 thousand propertys?
giving rise to Major Corruption in the State of Minnesota,City of St.Paul and County of Ramsey

Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog

6.
Aesthetics and conformance with a governing body’s comprehensive plan may be considered as bases for zoning and Tax rulings.

42 USC 3631
7.
Zoning is not to be based upon a plebiscite of the neighbors; neighborhood objections alone are not legally sufficient to support land use regulation. Nevertheless, their views remain a consideration in a governing body’s ultimate decision.

8.
A county-wide ”takings” “Condemnations” by Water,Electric Shutoff , Stalking causing Fractured Ankle, taking 91 Chrysler, Trailer, Contents, Porta Potty by Theft, Trespass,Treason since 1988 Ramsey Dist. File 495722 and 66 Million Default Judgment File no 499129 giving rise to AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NOW CHIEFAffidavitPrejudice K athleen Gearin Judge

JUDGE KATHLEEN GEARINSCAP

IN her capacity-conflict as Commitment Judge, triggering DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES AND
on all citizens in a “protected class” of Social Security Receipants, Disability, in the instant case is unreasonable per se and therefore improper. Summary Judgment taken without
Evidentary Hearings, List of Witness’s

62CV-09-11693
Amicus 20brief 9.
The district court is vested with broad discretion in supervising the course and scope of discovery.

10.
In actions to review the final zoning decision of a governing body, the admission of evidence not presented to the governing body is subject to the district court’s discretion.
11.
Although strongly encouraged, a governing body is not required to make formal findings of fact concerning its decisions regulating land use. It is more important that there exists a record of what the governing body considered before making its decision so that the reviewing court is not left in a quandary as to why the decision was made.
12.
The test for determining whether a state law violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution is: (1) whether the state law has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship; (2) whether there is a significant
and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation; and (3) whether the adjustment of the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.
13.
Despite a court finding of substantial impairment of a contractual relationship, legislation may still be upheld under an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution if there is a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation and if the adjustments to the contracting parties’ rights and responsibilities are based upon reasonable conditions and are of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption.
14.
For the threshold issue in an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution—whether the regulation has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship—a court must consider whether the industry the complaining party has entered has been regulated in the past. This consideration is required because one whose rights, such as they are, are subject to state restriction, cannot remove them from the power of the State by making a contract about them.
15.
In an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, whether the adjustment of rights and responsibilities of contracting parties is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation’s adoption, the courts properly defer to legislative judgment as to the necessity and reasonableness of a particular measure when the State is not a contracting party.
16.
An appellate court review of whether a board of county commissioners’ resolution is preempted by statute is, like interpretation of statutes and ordinances, a question of law. The standard of review is therefore unlimited.
17.
State law preemption of a particular field cannot be implied but must be expressed by a clear statement in the law.
18.
There is a presumption that the legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation.
19.
Absent an express statement by Congress that state law is preempted, federal preemption occurs where (1) there is an actual conflict between federal and state law; (2) where compliance with both federal and state law is, in effect, physically impossible; (3) where Congress has occupied the entire field of regulation and leaves no room for states to supplement federal law; or (4) when the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full objectives of Congress.
20.
In the absence of express preemption in a federal law, there is a strong presumption that Congress did not intend to displace state law.
APPELLANT_QUITAM_RELATOR SHARED ISSUES:

1. Did the district court err in determining that the City Council and Ramsey Co. Board’s decision “takings” by Theft,Trespass,Treason without Improvements on Homestead, Disabled Property Owners, amending the taxing regulations by Illegal Fees/Assessment, Summary Abatements without “due process” was lawful, i.e., that it did violate the

42 USC 3631

2. Did the district court err with Libel with Malice in determining that the Full Taxes of Homestead Property at 697 Surrey, 2008 were paid and that Title is in the name of Decedant James R. Anderson et al and
decision amending the online banking statement of regulations was reasonable?
Property taxes paid $949.86 Property taxes paid

Sharon paid taxes 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul MN 2008 – Google Search

SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court

697Surrey3May09_15.pdfGreen23

No.4. Did the district court err in dismissing the claim alleging that the property taxes for 697 Surrey 2008 were paid in full? Judge John Vandenorty complicity with Auditor Mark Oswald to violate the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution? YES.
ISSUES:
5. Did the district court CRIMINALLY err by having a Student Attorney who failed to research the Case in its entirety alleging preemption of the Bank and Wire Fraud regulation’s amendment by Fraud unpon the Court and Fraud on the United States of America on a Protected Class of Citizens. Techinally Repealing State Laws thus Treason YES.

6. Did the district court err in dismissing Attorney Pro Se’s pdf. Forensic Files to expose Major Corruption of the Judgescomplicit with Auditor, and DFL Gubnatorial Cadidate, Ramsey Co Attorney Susan Gaertner who is claiming alleging preemption of the Banking laws and regulation amendments by federal law? YES
Memorandumn

Bill Dahn’s Banking Regulations Morton Ave St.Paul MN – Google Search

Concurrent with the release of A09-2031 Order (toussaint) court has ordered Affiant to submit Informal brief on certain questions raised in the issues originally presented on appeal by both Plaintiff State of Minnesota and Respondant.

Those original issues are: whether the district court erred in Summary Judgment dismissing the claims alleging that the taxing decision’s amending the regulations violated the Takings Clause and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. YES.

Minnesota’s Strike Force “taking” our Cars for Profit, involving Aaron Foster, Manager of
St.Paul Police Impound Lot, without Public Improvements, taxing to forclosure
without Tickets,Warrants,Approval to Prosecute

Bill Dahn: USDist02-0332(Rosenbaum)(FIAFEA&FIRREA)
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Bill Dahn: Bud Shaver Stole Bill’sCampaign Bus?
Our order requiring supplemental briefing on takings necessarily stays our resolution of the following issues originally presented on appeal by Intervenors: whether the district court erred in dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and inverse condemnation.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME
EXCEPT ACCESS TO THE COURTS MUST BE IN PDF FORMAT, FORENSIC FILES FOR PUBLIC
SCRUNITY.

These Criminal Charges against the State do not have to have Filing Fees,

MN Judges violation of Citizenery Civil,Constitutional Rights – Google Search

Sharons QuoWarranto v. MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031

December 23, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Wed. 23Dec09

AFFIDAVIT OF E:SERVICE:BYSHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON, ATTORNEY PRO SE,QUITAM

TO: The Above named :Sue Dosal,Staff,Court Employees in their Official Capacities, Severally, Individually, John Doe and Mary Roe. State Court Administrator’s Office

**AFFIANT: Sharon reserves the Right to Quo Warranto re: Toussaints Order dtd.7Dec09 A09-2031 to join with A06-1150 re: My Presentations on SlideShare RICO Charges.**
Sue Dosal, State Court Administrator	Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Administrator’s Office Branch. She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982. Prior to her appointment she served as Senior Staff Attorney for the National Center for State Courts, Deputy State Court Administrator for the state of Florida, Staff Director of the Florida Legislature’s Joint Select Committee on Judicial Personnel, AFFIANTS NOTE: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office (651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax) Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 135 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 5515

Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(Toussaint)
FAX TRANSMITTAL Resubmit Sat.19Dec09 23Dec09
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others

COUNT I Title 18 sec.1951 HRA charging off Loan to Selective Contractors ie: Sherman Associates.
City of St. Paul, MN – Official Website – Council

COUNT II Title 26 sec 1602 Tax Credits

COUNT III Loan Forgiveness re: MN Const. Art X.

COUNT IV RICO Pattern of HRA and City’s Bizzare Taxing Scheme, contrary to MN Constitution, and State Crim Code MS 609.xx
609 – CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

http://about:blank Challenge in its Entirety,
“taking” without Public Hearing.

Relator admits to Published Order by Chief Appellate Judge Edward Toussaint dtd.7Dec09, Affiant found Published today.
www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen Google Groups US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us
2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278
Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301
Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177
Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010
Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155
St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574
and all others as their interest appear.
FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES
CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others
WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections, Challenges the City St.Paul,MN Agenda 23Dec09 in its Entirety

42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to Poverty, QuiTam Whistleblower In Fact her new Medicare now “takes” 140.10 for Insurance and 14.40 for Prescriptions?

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida
re:
Today’s Topic Summary
Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics
Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]
Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]
Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–
Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request
–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida
re:
Today’s Topic Summary
Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics
Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]
Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]
Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–
Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request
–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299
Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al
East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163
Interesting MN Court Administrator Sue Dosal Husband former MN Fed. Court Clerk
with “Tys” to Florida
re:Group: http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/topics
Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. [1 Update]
Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation [1 Update]
Topic: Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury.
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 07:22PM -0500 ^

Remedies for Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien in Florida

Florida Statutes <http://leg.state.fl.us/Statutes> provide possible remedies for fraudulent notices of tax lien.

28.222 requires the clerk to KNOW US LAW regarding federal tax liens and levies and to record federal tax liens ONLY if made in accordance with that law. The clerks don’t know anything about US law, and the county attorneys falsely inform them from IRS booklets made just to suborn clerks. You could point out that a lien notice has no validity unless a duly authorized assessment officer signed (under penalties of perjury) the assessment that forms the basis for the lien. I have NEVER seen such an assessment document signed under penalties of perjury that it is a bona fide and accurate assessment of taxes owed, due, and payable

713.31 – Remedies for fraud and collusion – worth looking at – treble damages.

713.901 (4) requires the certification of notices of liens (see IRS 7806 and 6065 and examine any lien notice for proper certification) by a “responsible” person (where’s the proof that the submitter is responsible to collect taxes and has a delegation of authority to perform that function?). Clerks never verify credentials of submitters or certification of the notice.

Filing of Recorded Notices of Federal Tax Lien

A lien notice is not a lien. The Clerk should file ONLY ACTUAL liens in the system of records reserved for liens. The Clerk should NOT file Notices in the Liens system. If the IRS does not like this, it can start creating paper liens, not invisible ones that it claims exist but really don’t. If it isn’t written, it isn’t true.

Statewide Grand Jury

IMO the clerk engages in racketeering with the IRS across multiple circuits throughout the state. Right now the Governor has empaneled (or will empanel) a Statewide Grand Jury. You should file an evidence package about this crime and demand SGJ investigation.

—————————————————————————————–

BobHurtSuit200707small <http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files FREE from the Lawmen <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!
<http://www.fuelsaver-mpg.com/affiliates/jrox.php?id=145_1_tlid_8_MailFoot> Save Fuel

—————————————————————————————–
Topic: Tom Cryer sues Rebecca O’Dell for Defamation
“Bob Hurt” Dec 22 12:52PM -0500 ^

Tom Cryer has filed a lawsuit (see below press release) against Rebecca O’Dell for defaming him in comments she made to subscribers of the St. Pete area Constitution Party meetup group. When I saw her comments, seemingly timed to coincide with Tommy’s upcoming Tea Party Squared tour of 7 Florida cities, I felt shocked because 1) they did not constitute truth, and 2) they seemed so atypical of an attorney because of their libelous nature.

I forwarded them to Tommy. He wrote a correction to Rebecca and told her, effectively, that if she’d find laws making people liable, he’d let her off the hook. She published a partial-correction letter to her readers, but she otherwise spurned his mercy. So, he sued.

The lawsuit does not please me, but then neither have I felt pleased about Rebecca’s intransigent attitude about the implementation of income tax in America, nor her attack on Tommy. And, Tommy should protect his reputation.

She told me repeatedly that she did not like income tax, but that the courts say we all have to pay it, and we need to do that and take up the issue with Congress. I told her that the income tax as implemented violates Article I Section 2 Clause 3 and Section 9 Clause 4 of the US Constitution. She seemed to think that since the lower courts have ruled thousands of times in favor of the IRS , they must be right.

Rebecca wrote me, in effect, that if she believed me, stopped paying tax as a consequence, and the IRS attacked her and prevailed against her, she’d sue me for damages for misleading her. She seemed pretty hostile about all the anti-income-tax gurus causing so many people to lose fortunes to the IRS and losing liberty to the courts.

I guess that hostility spilled over onto Tom Cryer when I sent her his memorandum. She must have thought him one of the anti-income-tax gurus who tells people to stop filing and stop paying. But Tom has repeatedly explained, effectively, that such an action constitutes financial suicidal, and we can only prevail in that if many millions of Americans do it at the same time. Tom has said that we must work together on ALL FRONTS of activism, politically, socially, legally, and financially, to attack and defeat IRS abuses and the courts and politicians who support them.

For several years I have advocated out and out legal attacks against IRS agents who abuse individuals – find the IRS agent errors, then demand correction, and failing correction, sue them and file administrative and criminal complaints against them. If EVERYBODY did this, IRS abuses would stop. Unfortunately, most people take Rebecca’s position and cave in to them without a fight.

——————————————————————————————————

<http://bobhurt.com/> Bob Hurt • <http://bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm> Lawmen • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files> Files • <http://groups.google.com/group/lawmen> Archive • <http://bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm> Scholarship • <http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002> Jurisdictionary • <http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt> GetZooks!

——————————————————————————————————

From: Tom Cryer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:48 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

INTERNET DIATRIBE

LANDS FLORIDA EMAILER IN COURT

SHREVEPORT, LA—In a law suit filed by Louisiana attorney Tommy K. Cryer a Florida woman is being taken to task for distributing an email containing what Cryer’s suit alleges is a string of false and defamatory claims. According to the law suit filed in Shreveport, Louisiana, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend, a St. Petersburg, FL, attorney, published and distributed emails falsely accusing Cryer of being a disbarred tax evader who does not believe there is any such thing as a federal individual income tax.

Cryer, who has been in uninterrupted law practice in Louisiana for over 36 years and who was cleared of tax evasion and willful failure to file charges by a unanimous “not guilty” jury verdict, says “I have no idea what prompted Townsend to fabricate and publish the false statements. Call me old fashioned, but I don’t understand why some people feel compelled to lie.”

At the time Truth Attack (www.truthattack.org), a non-profit political action organization, which Cryer founded and heads up and whose stated mission is “putting the government back in its box—one tentacle at a time,” was in the process of promoting and conducting seminars for tea party and other political activists on what they called “The Lost Art of Citizenry”. The seminars offered instruction on how to organize and coordinate group activities, how to learn about our rights and government’s limitations, ways to distribute information to the public and inside information on how to influence representatives’ and government officials’ actions.

Barely a week before the seven seminars were to begin Townsend published and distributed a blistering mass emailing that was distributed widely across the internet, stating that Cryer was a disbarred tax evader who contended that there is no such thing as a federal individual income tax and that Cryer and those associated with him “have left a wake of destroyed families in their wake.” Cryer said “I am not nor have I ever been disbarred, I am not a tax evader and have never destroyed a family in my life, let alone a ‘wake of families’, whatever that means.”

Now Cryer has filed suit in Shreveport seeking damages for defamation. Cryer said “I don’t know this woman and have never heard of her before. I don’t know why she made up and published all these lies about me and my organization, but I will not sit idly by while someone attempts to destroy an unsullied reputation I have spent a lifetime in building.”

Source: Truth Attack

Contact: Jim Kerr, 318 795-2030

hq@truthattack.org

Interviews available on request
–
You received this because you have membership in the “Lawmen” Google Group.
Comment to group owner – reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options – visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen
Join / Subscribe – send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Recap Firefox Extension “turning PACER around” http://angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/water.html

SharonsFiles2005_2009

December 5, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Better Access to Public Court Records

RECAP is a free extension for Firefox that improves the experience of using PACER, the electronic public access system for the U.S. Federal District and Bankruptcy Courts. It:

Helps you give back: Contributes to a public archive hosted by the Internet Archive
Saves you money: Shows you when free documents are available
Keeps you organized: Gives you better filenames, enables useful headers
…and more

(privacy policy)

You must be using Firefox to install Recap.
Download Firefox

(if you are using a Firefox variant

Files on E- Democracy, St. Paul – April 06, 2006:Best regards from, Sharon		HOME

		Water Board, 2006
Download/Get: File 1	Constitutionality State Laws
Download/Get: File 2	Health Issues
Download/Get: File 3	Eminent Domain Demolition
Download/Get: File 4	Election Contest
Download/Get: File 5	POA 4/17/2006
Download/Get: File 6	Sharon’s Federal Cases 1973 to 2006
Download/Get: File 7	USDist.Crt.02-0332 (Rosenbaum)
Download/Get: File 8	Eminent Domain Homeless Andersons
Download/Get:	Index E Democcracy April 6, 2006

:REPORTER NANCY LAZARYAN – CNN iReport

Sharon4Anderson Budget_Fights

December 1, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Please help fight these Budgets,Its our Money “taken” by Theft,Trespass,Treason, Creating Mortgage 42 USC 3631Forclosures iGoogle

REPORTER NANCY LAZARYANLine Drawn in the Sand Nancy Lazaryan MN – Google Search

November 26, 2009 rice, Minnesota Vetting explained

Posted johnkhutchis

iReport —

LINE DRAWN IN THE SAND RNC CONVENTION

2nd Judicial Judges are complicit 4 Pecuniary Judges As Criminals?GainJudgeJoanneSmith_Qualifications re complicity AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profileg Judge John Vandenorth et al,

From: Sharon4Anderson
To: fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us
, shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us , Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us
CC: dorrick@pioneerpress.com, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, ericwblack@gmail.com
Sent: 12/1/2009 7:33:39 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Court Forms mnd.courts.gov District of MM,Sharon4Anderson v CitySt.Paul,CoRamsey BudgetLIEN

Click here: Court Forms United States District Court – District of Minnesota
Tues. 1Dec09

LEGAL NOTICE TO FRED GRITTNER CLERK,ADMINISTRATOR LARRY DEASE SUE DOSAL Media, Public at Large

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA CHERGOSKY-PETERSON
FOR TITLE SEARCH’S

Why the State of MN has not kept up with Word or pdf filings of any all documents. re: www.mnd.uscourts.gov

LEGAL NOTICE TO CHALLENGE THE CITY ST.PAUL, CO.RAMSEY FINAL

BUDGET HEARINGS, via EF ie: Electronic Filings, Title 18 Case Fixing by Auditor Mark Oswald,complicity with Lynn Moser and Judge John Vandenorth. re: www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson complicit with the Ponzi Scheme by Student Lawyer
John Edison who wilfully failed to research that Taxes were paid re: 2008, Exemptions of the “taking” Homestead Credit, Exemption of Disabled, Senior, Death,Disability,Disparagment of Titles, Complicity County

Attorney DFL Susan Gaertner aka Mrs. John Wodele aka Mrs. James B. Froehle 5505 Porland White Bear Town, MN 55110 and the Gaertner Family (TRUST) 1179 Summit Ave. St. Paul MN 55104
Dm 1399 23 exploiting the Anderson Family to Death,Disability,Disparagment of Titles in a “Patterened Enterprise” in the Office of County Attorney.

Jr,Willy 8th Cir 1997

The Tax Payer pays for this re: Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62c09-1163 Appeal A09-2031 Any all Forensic Doc are Filed, Any all Jurisdiction has been met
with Answers Cross, since 1974 , current 1/2 million Default Judgment against the City St. Paul Published on File with Risk Manager Ron Guilfole

Sharon4Anderson v. City St.Paul, Ron Guilfoile MN – Google Search

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf
www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com with POA
www.sharonanderson.org

Good Faith intent to Challenge the City of St.Paul and County of Ramsey’s Budget, with Affiants Default Claims, Damages since 1974 In the Matter of Sharon Scarrella Associate Justice 221NW2nd562
when current Chief Justice Eric Magnuson was clerk for Decedant Justice Sheran.

City of St. Paul, MN – Official Website – Council
Sharon4Anderson v. Co. Ramsey Risk Management MN – Google Search

23.

2010 Proposed Budget and Tax Levy. (Public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m.)

At all times material: the Heinous, Repugnant Deprivation of Affiants 91 Chrysler, Answer CrossComplant
AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog over 20 years is BIZZARE.

THEREFORE: PUNITATIVE,COMPENSATORY,TORT DAMAGES IN THE MILLIONS ARE TAKEN……….

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

At all times material: the Heinous, Repugnant Deprivation of Affiants 91 Chrysler, Answer CrossComplant
AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog over 20 years is BIZZARE.

THEREFORE: PUNITATIVE,COMPENSATORY,TORT DAMAGES IN THE MILLIONS ARE TAKEN……….

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson
SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Public Hearing and Open House-Nov. 30th, 6:30 pm

Ramsey County invites you to attend its Public Hearing/Open House regarding its Proposed 2010 Budget and Levy, Monday, Nov. 30th, 6:30 p.m. in the Roseville Area High School Cafeteria, 1240 County Road B2, Roseville. (map)

Hear a presentation on the proposed 2010 budget and levy and how property taxes are determined, have a chance to address the County Board and visit the many informational booths on County programs.

For detailed information on the Ramsey County budget.

For more information on property taxes.

Posted in Sharons Tax/Election Files, Uncategorized Leave a Comment »

SharonsAppealA09-2031ProSe

November 18, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

At all times Material the RULES are followed Call today to 651-296-2581 Mona was curteous, Suzie stated IFP was not in the Packet, Sharon Anderson’s Presentations on SlideShare Case Information
Case Number:	A092031	Filing Date:	11/06/2009
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals	Status:	Pre-Briefing
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Nonoral
Classification:	Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Full Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:
Citation:

- Hide Party Information

MACS ID	Appellate Role	Party Name	Attorney(s)
Party Information
51332	Appellant	Sharon Anderson	Pro Se
10976	Respondent	Ramsey County	JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status
Notice – Case Filing Aff Ser4 Nov09 Ifp Tit18 6	Court of Appeals	11/12/2009	Notice	Case Filing	Final
Statement – Case – Appellant	Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Statement	Case – Appellant	Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed	Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Notice	Appeal – Case Filed	Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez	Court of Appeals	10/15/2009	Transcript	Initial Certificate	Final

Sharon Anderson’s Presentations on SlideShare

SharonsAppealA09-2031

November 18, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Help

Sharon ForensicFiles all at Slideshare or Scribd

Case View

ORCA Info

Case Information
Case Number:	A092031	Filing Date:	11/06/2009
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals	Status:	Pre-Briefing
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Nonoral
Classification:	Standard – Civil – Other
Short Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Full Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:
Citation:

- Hide Party Information

MACS ID	Appellate Role	Party Name	Attorney(s)
Party Information
51332	Appellant	Sharon Anderson	Pro Se
10976	Respondent	Ramsey County	JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View
Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information
Document Description	Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Docket Entry Type	Filing Type	Status
Notice – Case Filing	Court of Appeals	11/12/2009	NoticeAff Ser4 Nov09 Ifp Tit18 6	Case Filing	Final
Statement – Case – Appellant	Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Statement	Case – Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163Appellant	Final
Notice – Appeal – Case Filed	Court of Appeals	11/06/2009	Notice	Appeal – Case Filed	Final
Transcript – Initial Certificate – Patricia Martinez	Court of Appeals	10/15/2009	Transcript	Initial Certificate	Final

Posted in Sharons Tax/Election Files, Uncategorized Leave a Comment »

SharonsStatementCase_62cv09-1163_Appeal

October 28, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Sent: 10/26/2009 6:37:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Appeal from 62cv09-1163SharonScarrellaAnderson Quitam Relator
Sent: 10/26/2009 5:19:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Appeal 62cv09-1163 http://www.mncourts.gov/

Abolish Property Taxes

TRANSMIT AND CERTIFY RECORD ON APPEAL WITH IFP SERVICE BY THE SHERIFF

This document must be accompanied by 2 copies of a completed statement of the case. IFP Service by Sheriff Bob.Fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us Faxes & Electronically.
SharonsAppeal 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a13303
APPENDIX OF FORMS

mn const. art.x taxes – Google Search

FORM 103A. NOTICE OF APPEAL (COURT OF APPEALS)

MN 62cv09-1163 � Sharon4anderson s Weblog

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY COUNTY COURT
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CASE TITLE Civil,Criminal,General Eminent Domain

To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the
Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202,
published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review-news.com

and all Candidates for Political Offices www.sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com
******************************************************************************

STATE OF MINNESOTA,Ward Einess, Revenue, Michael Campion DPS,Cal Ludman HS,All Agencies,County of Ramsey,All Agencies, City of

St.Paul,MN,All Agencies, DSI,HS,HR,

AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling

John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacity s, Ind ividually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NWS2d,562

Plaintiffs
V.

697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 96 Blogs
www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson. http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169

Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Theft Trespass Larceny RICO

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS

TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER: 62cv09-1163
DATE OF ORDER: 8Sept.09
OR
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09

DATE JUDGMENT ENTERED:10Sept09

TO: Clerk of the Appellate Courts Fred Grittner et al
Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Please take notice that the above-named defendant’s 3rd party plaintiff’s appeals to the Court of Appeals of the
State of Minnesota from an order (judgment) of the court filed (10Sept09) on the date shown,
denying defendant’s_ QuiTam Relator motion’s Jury trial Evidentiary Hearing, Fact Finding,Continuence, Affidavit of Prejudice and for Public Policy pdf Formats found at http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

Affidavit of Prejudice AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge

08/12/2009

Notice of Motion and MotionSharons FactFinding 62cv09-1163 Taxes/Elections

08/13/2009

Other DocumentMotion to Continue 62cv09-1163Judge John Vandenorth

08/17/2009

08/19/2009

Motion http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharon4andersonwebnair-20aug09

Document SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court pg26Sharons Letter Motion 62cv09-1163

NAME,ADDRESS AND NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR PLAINTIFF’S

Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner aka Mrs. John Wodele, M.Jean Stepan aka Mrs.John Tancabel 895 Osceola St.Paul, (105120) MN Student John Edison address unk

Sicko-City StPaul: FindLaw InterrogatoriesJean Tancabel aka Jean Stepan re: 62cv09-1163

Phone:Tel: 651-266-3222 Fax: 651-266-3010 Email: RCA@co.ramsey.mn.us

Ramsey County Attorney

NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND ATTORNEY
REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT:
/s/ VA Widow_Whistleblower QuiTam Relator, Attorney Pro Se,Private AG, InFact, Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella Tel: 651-776-5835

Legal Domicile: 1058 Summit/PO Box 4384 and 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN 55104-0384

ECF 165913_sa1299___sharon4anderson@aol.com _E Democracy Files – Sharon Anderson

_____
http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf

SIGNATURE
(The trial court caption is used on the notice of appeal. Subsequent documents shall bear the
appropriate appellate court caption. {HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a10301″}, subd. 1 specifies
the contents of the notice of appeal and filings required to perfect an appeal, including filing fees.
{HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a10303″} sets forth judgments and orders which are appealable
to the Court of Appeals. {HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a10401″} specifies time limits for
filing and service of the notice of appeal. {HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a107″} provides for
bond or deposit for costs. {HYPERLINK “RCAP.htm” \l “a10801″} provides for a supersedeas

FORM 133. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
(IN COURT OF APPEALS)
CASE TITLE: General,Civil,Criminal Eminent Domain,Taxes,Forfeiture,Constitutionality MS 429.061 Fees/Assess/ROW
STATEMENT OF THE CASE OF
(RESPONDENT)
TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER:62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth)Reporter(Martinez)
vs.
APPELLATE COURT CASE NUMBER: UNK
Respondent.
1. Court or agency of case origination and name of presiding judge or hearing officer.Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul St.Paul City Council (Lantry) thurs,5Jul2007,Res Assess 07-601pub.hearing 15Aug07,(GS3041156) Notice to Combine Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A J0708A: Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053, Referred to Risk Management Ron Guilfoile, See Venue: Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv09-1163 Judge Edward Cleary, Recused, Judge Gregg Johnson Recused, Judge John Vandenorth.

2. Jurisdictional statement

Study in Appellate Advocacy: Guide To Appellate Briefs The Appellate Brief : SparkCharts

Minnesota Court of Appeals – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tax and Property Look Up Information – Quick Info 697 Surrey http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA090064-0306.pdf re Mark Oswald Canvass Board

QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether the Court criminally abused its discretion by Acting a WAR with MN Constitution Art. X to dispose of appellants constitutional challenge , Bizzare Method of City St.Paul Fees/Assessments/ROW by Theft,Trespass and Treason.? Usury Interest on Property Tax Statement without WritProA06-1150 30Jun06 Formal Complaints,Warrants,Tickets to Defend

2. Auditor Mark Oswald in perjury as http://www.usbank.com/ Tax Receipts pdf format.

Mark Oswald Auditor/Elections re: 2008 US Senate

Mark Oswald Canvass Board US Senate 2008 MN – Google Search

Auditor’s False Statements have put at risk 3 thousand Propertys + QuiTam Relator

MN 62cv09-1163 � Sharon4anderson s Weblog ,

. Sections 212, 214(b), 214(c), 304, 319, and 403(b) of the Bipartisan Campaign Re-form Act of 2002 (BCRA), Pub. L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81, because those challenges are plainly nonjusticiable or insubstantial under settled law.
bipartisan campaign re-form act 2002 – Google Search

3. Whether, in other respects, the Court should note probable jurisdiction over appellants constitutional challenges to BCRA, Relators Medicare, Federal Jurisdiction and set the appeals on those issues for briefing and oral argument.

Intellectual Property in Cyberspace

Minnesota’s Longest Arm: Jurisdiction Over the Internet – Law Firm Mansfield, Tanick and Cohen, P.A. Attorneys Minneapolis, M..

PROOF OF SERVICE 62cv09-1163

BY PDF FORMAT SHARONSCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON

AKA CHERGOSKY_VA Widow_Whistleblower_Candidate State AG,Attorney Pro Se_Private AG

AFFIANT; SET’S FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUSED
BY EMPLOYEES OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL ,COUNTY OF RAMSEY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THEIR TRUSTEE’S UNDER THE NAME
OF THE UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION 42 USC 3631 GROUNDS FOR INJURY VIOLATIONS OF

TITLE 18 USCs: 241,242,245,
Civil Rights Division Home Page HATE CRIMES, R.I.C.O. 18 USCs 1581 Peonage, 1584,Servitude

HONEST SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION OF THE US and State of Minnesota’s Constitution’s & STATUTES of wrong doings, “Bad Behavior” MS609.
609 – CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

Title 42 USC sec.1983 – Google Search

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or
other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any
action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken
in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be
granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief
was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress
applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered
to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

1 . Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972).
Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973).

Title 42 USC sec.1983 Wood v. Breier, Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, Private AG’s – Google Search

Each citizen acts as a private attorney
general who takes on the mantel of sovereign ,

2. Minnesota is a Right to Work State! Affiant 1973 Started the Church of Justice Reform, legally incorporated at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul, re: Scarrella v. Midwest Fed S&L – Google Search

536F.2d.1207

Its OK to practice God`s law with out a
license, Luke 11:52, Sharon in Good Faith re: God`s Law was here first! There is a higher loyalty than the Office of Justice of the MN Supreme Court. Sharon Scarrella for Assoc. Justice MN Sup Crt. – Google Search loyalty to this
country, loyalty to God U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 172, 85 S. Ct. 850, 13 L. Ed. 2d 733
(1965)

US v. Seeger – Google Search

3. The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners,
United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. Schware v. Board Examines – Google Search

In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)

Sims v Aherns – Google Search

The practice of law is an occupation of common right. A bar card is not a license, its a dues card
and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A association is not license,
it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same……….

RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED BY
Relief can be granted in the following ways in dollar amount Option (A). Approximately
$60,000,000.00 million tax free dollars (Sixty-Six Million Dollars) including Legal Fees, Costs,

Research and Time or tax free;

PLUS THE RIGHTS TO RECOVERY.All 13 Propertys, 91 Chrysler,Trailer,Drivers License, triggering Long Formal Complaints, Warrants, List of Witness, Evidentary , Indictments in the Murder of Cpl.Jim Anderson, 21Sept2000 Sharons 2nd Husband
, Intestate Decedants Tenants in Common , William O and Bernice A. Peterson, Sharons Parents,

Murder of Steven Monroe Quale Sr. and the “takings” of Sharons Daughter Vonessa

40 yrs ago by Corrupt Officials, Cold Case Murders http://minnesota-murders.blogspot.com Barb Winn aks Aaron Foster Manager of Police Impound Lot “who stole sharons car”, Greenly and 10 month Baby Boy Henry Gooselaw Jr (40) years ago.

Remove the City Attorney John Choi,Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner and Jean Stepan, Student John Edison and State Attorney General Lori Swanson affilliates ,ABA BAR Association and place all lawyer’s under the state or federal
licensing program to work in this country under the Constitutional Mandate as it was originally
required. Remove all Lawyers and Attorneys as Staff employment for The State of Minnesota and Congress. Have the State of Minnesota and Congress
restate the state militia under the intent of HR11654 better known as the DICK ACT of 1902

Dick Act 1902 – Google Search

and allow the state militia to enforce and bring claims of injury to the Minnesota State Legislature and floor of Congress to have
these issue address and deal with in 72 hour of such complaint or before a citizen tribunal
hearing board. or Convene Grand Jurys.

Option (B), Bring in the military to help set up a new government to be put in
place and remove all federal and state officials who are guilty of Malfeasance,Nonfeasance,Misfeasance from office and brought them up on military
charges as was done in Germany 1945 for crime against humanity. That how relief can be
granted. The debt cause in this action comes under the 14th amendment section 3 people section

4 tell how to collect this debt..as the “takings” of our Homesteads via City Council’s RICO Acts of Theft,Trespass,Treason placed on Property Taxes without Public Improvements to cause Eminent Domain must not stand.

Disclaimer: City of St.Paul cannot and must not tax,Fees/Assessments/ROW based on

Criminal RICO Acts of Theft of Cars,Trailers,Personal Property, Water, Trespass on private Property ie 3 Thousand Cases, Affiant is the only one to Answer, and Treason to Deny Act at War with STate and Federal Laws, Constitutional Guarantees on Candidate Sharon Anderson aka Sharon4Anderson,Scarrella,Peterson-Chergosky_Beckley, Woman,Senior,Disabled, in a Protected Class.
REFERANCE COURT CASES
1. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2nd 233.

Picking v. Pennsylvania – Google Search

Pro se
pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to
be held to the same high
standards of perfection as lawyers. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25.

Platsky v CIA – Google Search

Additionally, pro se litigants
are to be given reasonable opportunity to remedy the defects in their pleadings. Reynoldson v
Reynoldson v Shillinger – Google Search Shillinger 907F .2d 124, 126 (10th Cir. 1990); See also Jaxon v Circle K. Corp. 773 F.2d 1138,
1140 (10th Cir. 1985) (1)
Jaxon v. Circle K. Corp – Google Search

2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S. Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a not a Liar or -lawyer and is moving forward in
Haines v. Kerner – Google Search

Private Attorney General and Attorney Pro Se, IFP

3. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715);
NAACP v. Button – Google Search

and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non-lawyers
Johnson v. Avery – Google Search can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being
charged with Unauthorized practice of law.

Unauthorized Practice of Law Rev. Dick Bullock MN – Google Search

4. Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1); Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia Bar – Google Search

Gideon v.Wainwright 372 U.S. 335;

gideon v. wainwright case brief – Google Search

Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be
assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings.
Argersinger v. Hamlin – Google Search

5. Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court Cases apply to State
Howlett v. Rose – Google Search Court Cases
6. Federal Rules Civil Proc., Rule 17, 28 U.S.C.A. Next Friend A next friend is a person who represents
Fed Rules 17, 28 USCA Next Friend – Google Search

someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest…

7. Minnesota Court Rules and Procedures,
Minnesota Court Rules – Google Search Title 12, sec. 2017 (C) If an infant or incompetent person does not have a duly appointed
representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad litem.
8. Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez, 23 F3d 576 (1st Cir. 1994) Inadequate training of subordinates may be basis for 1983 claim.

Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez – Google Search

9. Warnock v. Pecos County, Tex., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not
Warnock v. Pecos County Tex – Google Search

protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state
officials acted in violation of federal law.
government offices, State, local political subdivision, judicial etc comes under Rule 4 j as a
Foreign State.
The question will arise to the issue of 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim to which relief can
be grant. How does put a price on such crimes against humanity. The issue should be
were the 12(b)(6) for the People or 12(b)(1)(2) rule 17 where was the people immunity.
If they were as censured about the people 12 (b) s and immunity and their rights We the
People would not be in this Court now.

NOTICE: We, the people, reserve the right to amend this Appeal at any time daring the
Process of this action at bar as www.usbank.com is the holding company for City of St. Paul and County of Ramsey Taxes, and that 20+ years ago Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin kicked us out of our Paid for Home, triggering the Heinous, Repugnant Deprivation of the Anderson’s both Disabled, Jim Silver Star, Purple Heart Marine (Korea), as said Judge apparantly embellzed over $110,000.00

“taking” our Homestead in a “Patterened Enterprise for over 20 years

currently the County Auditor Mark Oswald is in Perjury or MN 62cv09-1163 � Sharon4anderson s Weblog he has also Embellzed the Property Tax Payment of $
449.92, > The Payment of $449.93 was returned and run thro again.

even tho Affiant called and thro another account processed.

Totalling $893.xx Paid May 15,16th 2008.

Affiant charges Mark Oswald as he has been notified by Phone,E-mails and Bank Statements. Oswald has tried to circumvent Affiants online Banking for his pecuniary gain.

Federal Reserve Banks,
mn const. art.x taxes - Google Search

Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the
relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purpose
of the FTCA, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.
Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region.
The stockholding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank’s nine member board of
directors. The remaining three directors are appointed by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal
Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks, but direct supervision and control of each Bank is
exercised by its board of directors. 12 U.S.C. � 301. The directors enact by-laws regulating the
12 USC 301 – Google Search

manner of conducting general Bank business, 12 U.S.C. � 341, and appoint officers to implement
12 USC 341 – Google Search

and supervise daily Bank activities. These activities include collecting and clearing checks,
making advances to private and commercial entities, holding reserves for member banks,
discounting the notes of member banks, and buying and selling securities on the open market.
See 12 U.S.C. �� 341 361.
12 USC 341-361 – Google Search

The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal
agencies under the Act. In United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 96 S. Ct. 1971, 48 L. Ed. 2d
US v. Orleans – Google Search

390 (1976), the Supreme Court held that a community action agency was not a federal agency or
instrumentality for purposes of the Act, even though the agency was organized under federal
regulations and heavily funded by the federal government. Because the agency’s day to day
operation was not supervised by the federal government, but by local officials, the Court refused
to extend federal tort liability for the negligence of the agency’s employees. Similarly, the
Federal Reserve Banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks.
Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank
employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by
worker’s compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees
room. When the Department Of Justice fails to prevent these actions in the courtroom
and conceal the truth this now show collusion between all three branches of
government. One branch of our government such had integrity to stand up for what is
right. Their failure to do so comes under the term of high crimes and treason, war
crimes, human rights violations, R.I.C.O., and etc. This Appellate Court
of the State of Minnesota www.mncourts.gov is being placed on Notice. Every Federal and State Court
outside of the Ten square miles area and the Federal Court inside of that ten
square miles, area have made it impossible, through its own corruption. For the People and Sharon Scarrella Anderson for over 30 years
lacked enforcement and has been denied the ability to defend herself as those in
Nazis Germany under Hitler. Those who set in the same position in Germany at ,that
time as member of their Government and Military stood before our Military Court and
the World Court and were tried for war crimes and crime against humanity. Years later
they are still being rounded up and charged. There is no statute of limitation on these
types of crimes. This Superior Court of the STate of Minnesota has the choice to find
some type of humanity to give to the People of this nations or pursuing their course of
action, knowing that such action is a crime and some day run the risk of be tried in
another world court.

This Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is fully aware that a corporation
can not bring charges against a living being. The High Court has ruled this in U.S.
Supreme Court PENHALLOW v. DOANE’S ADM’RS, 3 U.S. 54 (1795) and Rule 17,
requires a interest party a living body. Penhallow v. Doanes Admr – Google Search

Case law
Title 28, USC 1601-1611 FSIA

Title 28 USC 1601 FSIA – Google Search

protects the people under the 11th amendment as all

11th amendment commerce clause – Google Search
public welfare. But because Congress’ control over the Civil Air Patrol is limited and the
corporation is not designated as a wholly owned or mixed ownership government corporation
under 31 U.S.C. �� 846 and 856, the court concluded that the corporation is a nongovernmental,
31USC 846 – Google Search

independent entity, not covered under the Act.
Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 U.S.C. � 341.

31USC 846 – Google Search

Conclusion
The issue being place before this Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is a
history of the abuse being allowed by the Federal and State Courts outside the Ten
square miles and by the Federal Courts inside the State of Minnesota against all
American Nationals. This is in direct violation of our federal constitution and statutes
and title 50 and the 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27,
1868 Chap. CCXLIX. —An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign
Title 50 – Google Search States and of the above. The American people never rescinded their citizenship to their
country, but by the misuse of legislation, created by the Bar Association, they have
fraudulently expatriated the public officials from our Country the united States of
America and their citizenship to a foreign state standing outside of the constitution and
Suspended the Federal and all State Constitutions without the people knowledge or
consent. By the Courts continuing these actions in the courtrooms they have become a
co-conspirator in acts of mutiny and the overthrow of a constitutional form of
government. Legislators are hiding behind the separation of power clause,
knowing full well of these injuries, being done to the people. When legislation by
Congress could be created to prevent this injury, and their willful failure to do so, make
them as guilty as those Court officials who deny the supreme of the land in their court
bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or
premiums are the same.
Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any
Allodial Title – Google Search

liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) “Hypothecated” all property within the
Federal Reserve Act (1913) – Google Search

federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees
(stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a
“beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States
hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their “subjects,” the
14th amendment us constitution – Google Search 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all
the credit “money substitute” it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States
government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan.
Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of
their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un-payable federal debt.
They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth
certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already
been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
The Banks are listed neither as “wholly owned” government corporations under 31 U.S.C. �
31 USC – Google Search

846 nor as “mixed ownership” corporations under 31 U.S.C. � 856, a factor considered in 31 USC 846,856 – Google Search

Wilful failure to address the Affidavit of Prejudice against Ramsey Co. Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

Ex. Disclosure Statement

http://www.povertylaw.org/poverty-law-library/case/55500/55504/55504a.pdf

Pearlv. United States, 230 F.2d 243 (10th Cir. 1956),

which held that the Civil Air Patrol is not a
Pearl v. US,230 F. 2d 243 – Google Search federal agency under the Act. Closely resembling the status [*1242] of the Federal Reserve
Bank, the Civil Air Patrol is a non-profit, federally chartered corporation organized to serve the
from sources within or outside the United States.
United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303

US Congressional Record Mar 17,1993 Vol 33 – Google Search

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the
Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,Public Law 89-719; declared by President
Emergency Banking Ace Mar 9 1933 – Google Search

Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 -
Emergency Banking Act June 5th 1933 – Google Search

Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the
Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States
Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States
supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase
in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.
The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty
protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a
“Canon Law Trust” as their model, adding stock and naming it a “Joint Stock Trust.” The U.S.
Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal “person” to duplicate a “Joint Stock
Trust” in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870),
3. 1935 U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Ruled
US v. Constantine 296 – Google Search

unconstitutional since prohibition has been repealed. No legislative act Has ever lawfully
established the IRS as a Department of the United States Treasury.
4. 1818: U. S. v. Beavans, 16 U.S. 336. Established two separate jurisdictions within the
US v. Beavans – Google Search

United States Of America: 1. The federal zone and 2. the 50 States . The I.R.C.
(INTERNAL REVENUE CODE) only has jurisdiction within the federal Zone .
5. Fraud by Trickery: Zone Improvement Plan (Zip Code) Congress divides the union states
(50 ) into 10 Federal Zones in violation of Constitution and Color of Law. Found in
Postal Code.
There are to type of action to which any Court can operate one is civil as found in the
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 2 or under Criminal Which is found under Title 50 Chapter
3 Section 23 Jurisdiction of United States courts and judges; upon complaint against any
alien enemy resident and at large within such jurisdiction or district, to the danger of the public
peace. The department of the IRS is misusing this section as defined below. {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.html” \o “TITLE 26 – INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26_10_A.html” \o “Subtitle A -
Income Taxes”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26_10_A_20_3.html” TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 245
The portion of Section 245 of Title 18 which is primarily enforced by the Criminal Section
makes it unlawful to willfully injure, intimidate or interfere with any person, or to attempt to do
so, by force or threat of force, because of that other person’s race, color, religion or national
origin and because of his/her activity as one of the following: (b) a participant in any benefit,
service, privilege, program, facility or activity provided or administered by the United States. (e)
a participant in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The offense is
punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon
the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
{HYPERLINK “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26.html” \o “TITLE 26 – INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE”} > {HYPERLINK “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F.html“
\o “Subtitle F – Procedure and Administration”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_64.html” \o “CHAPTER 64 -
COLLECTION”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_64_30_D.html” \o “Subchapter D -
Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_64_30_D_40_II.html” \o “PART II -
LEVY”} > � 6331. Levy and Distraint
(a) Authority of Secretary
If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice
and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall
be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property
(except such property as is exempt under section {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006334—-000-.html“}) belonging to
such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy
may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of
the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States
or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section
3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the
collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may
be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy
shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.
United States Supreme case decision on taxes just to name a few. Taxes can only apply to
those under 26 USC 6331 and not the people of the several fifty states. Below are the case laws.
1. 1895 Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Co. 157 U. S. 429, 158 U.S. 601 The Supreme
Court ruled income tax unconstitutional.
Pollock v. Farmers Loan – Google Search

2. 1920 Eisner v. Mcomber, 252 U.S. 189, 206

Eisner v. Macomber – Google Search

Congress cannot by any definition it
may adopt conclude what income is, since it cannot by legislation alter the
Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate and within who s
limitations alone that power Can be lawfully exercised.
long been a part of human history. It is only recently, however, that our society has given it a
name and decided to monitor it, study it and legislate against it.” 1
The FBI defines a hate crime (a.k.a. bias crime) to be: “a criminal offense committed against a
person, property or society which is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against
a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin.” (America Nationals)
Public Law #103-322A, a 1994 federal law, defines a hate crime as: “a crime in which the
Hate Crime Public Law #103-322A – Google Search defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the
object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin,
ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person.”
Official definitions of hate crimes:
Typical hate crime laws criminalize the use of force, or the threat of force, against a
Person because they are a member of a specific, protected group. Four definitions of
the term “hate crime” are:
Hate Crimes Statistics Act (1990): “… crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on
race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder,
nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation, arson,
and destruction, damage or vandalism of property.” (Public Law 101-275).
Bureau of Justice Administration (BJA; 1997): “Hate crimes–or bias-motivated crimes are
defined as offenses motivated by hatred against a victim based on his or her race, religion,
sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin.”
Anti-Defamation League (ADL): A hate crime is “any crime committed because of the victim’s
actual or perceived race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, gender [male or
female] or sexual orientation.”
National Education Association (NEA): “Hate crimes and violent acts are defined as offenses
motivated by hatred against a victim based on his or her beliefs or mental or physical
characteristics, including race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation.”
Traditional hate crime legislation protects persons because of “his race, color, religion or
national origin , ” as in the case of the 1969 federal hate crimes law. (18 U.S.C. Section 245).
Most state laws now include additional protected groups. Some laws are restrictive and
Only protect a member of a group if she/he is involved in specific activities. For
example, the 1969 federal law only applies if the crime happens when a person is
attending a public school or is at work or participating in one of four other “federally
protected activities.”
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any
segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > � 2331
� 2331. Definitions
(5) the term domestic terrorism means activities that
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United
States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
HR 3162 RDS
SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
`(5) the term `domestic terrorism’ means activities that–
`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United
States or of any State;
`(B) appear to be intended–
`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population
HATE CRIMES
When the Federal Government; Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches allows
such action they are now aiding & abating in Hate crimes as defined by the FBI in the
following issue. When these Government offices have had complaint filed into them and
the people has had appointment to cover these issues in person with the public officials
and they refuse to address the complaint. By hiding behind the separated of power
clause. These are the same official who created, enforce and minister the laws. If law
can be created to injury, be enforced and minister to injury the people then laws can be
made to reversed such injuries by the same means.
The FBI’s hate-crime report for 2002 quotes a statement about hate crimes by the
American Psychological Association:
“…not only is it an attack on one’s physical self, but is also an attack on one’s very
identity.”Attacks upon individuals because of a difference in how they look, pray or behave have
(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment. The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to
commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other
than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon
another within his custody or control.
(C) Performing biological experiments. The act of a person who subjects, or conspires or
attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical control to biological
experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body
or health of such person or persons.
(D) Murder. The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or
kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under
this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those
placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.
(I) Taking hostages. The act of a person who, having knowingly seized or detained one or
more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person or persons with the
intent of compelling any nation, person other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or
refrain from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety or release of such person or
persons.
(2) Definitions. In the case of an offense under subsection (a) by reason of subsection (c)(3)
(A) the term severe mental pain or suffering shall be applied for purposes of paragraphs
(1)(A) and (1)(B) in accordance with the meaning given that term in section 2340 (2) of
this title;
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113C > � 2340
� 2340. Definitions
Title 18 2340 – Google Search

(2) severe mental pain or suffering means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting
from
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or
suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures
calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and
(3) United States means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and
the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States.
DOMESTIC TERRORISM
There is no single, universally accepted definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in
the Code of Federal Regulations as …the unlawful use of force and violence against
pretender and or agents who has expatriated themselves from the constitutional form of
government to a foreign state standing then to allow the misuse or impersonate a
constitutional position in order to collect federal funds and to bond these cases to place
in a insurance account under ticket numbers, case number or use of federal ID number
in a time that a State Emergency has been declared. This misuse of that public office
and in a state of emergency a war crime and also is defined as a hate crime as a group
is being singled out (American National) and also falls under the term of R.I.C.O. (TITLE 18 >
PART I > CHAPTER 96 > � 1961)
� 1961. Definitions
Title 18 s 1961 – Google Search

(1) racketeering activity means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling,
arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance
or listed chemical.
(2) State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any political subdivision, or any
department, agency, or instrumentality thereof;
(4) Enterprise includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity;
(5) pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of
which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten
years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering
activity;
Definition of a war crime comes under.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > � 2441
� 2441. War crimes
Title 18 s 2441 – Google Search

(d) Common Article 3 Violations.
(1) Prohibited conduct. In subsection (c)(3), the term grave breach of common Article 3
means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the
international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:
(A) Torture. The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act
specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or
suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical
control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation,
coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.

TITLE 50, APPENDIX App. > TRADING > ACT > � 2
Title 50 Trading Act s2 – Google Search

� 4. Licenses to enemy or ally of enemy insurance or reinsurance companies; change of name;
doing business in United States.
Required SR 22 bond
Laws vary from state to state on the legal requirements one must meet in order to be a licensed
driver. In most states, one must carry proof of insurance in order to drive; being caught without
proof of insurance carries a stiff penalty. An SR22 is a financial responsibility document that
informs the state that a driver has met his or her insurance requirements.
Function
While all states require drivers to be insured in order to legally drive, most states do not require
that the state has documentation of said insurance unless the driver is pulled over or otherwise
attracts the attention of the Department of Motor Vehicles. In certain cases, however, a driver
will need to register his or her insurance with the state, and that is where the SR22 comes in. The
SR22 is generally filed by the insurance provider and tells the state that the driver does have the
insurance required to be on the road. In the event that the insurance policy is canceled, the
provider is likewise required to inform the state that the driver does not have the required
coverage.
State-to-State Differences
Some states (Pennsylvania, Delaware, Minnesota, Kentucky, New Mexico, and Oklahoma) never
require an SR22, but if a driver required one in his or her previous state, it is still necessary to
remain on file with that state; moving from Ohio to Oklahoma will not absolve one of his or her
responsibilities towards Ohio. Additionally, if the requirements for insurance are different, the
driver must meet the requirements for both states in order to drive legally. Neither New York nor
North Carolina, however, require out-of-state SR22 filings

so returning by circumstances beyond his control.
By the Federal and State Courts allowing such act by the Federal and State
v. Bevans, 16 U.S. 3 Wheat. 336 336 (1818) these case law show
that there are three different and distinct forms of the United States of America.
The Federal and State Courts and the Federal and State pretenders and their
agents have misused the meaning of these Supreme Court cases along with title 50 of
the USC and have knowingly defrauded the America people by expatriation them from
their own country in the courtrooms and silenced them making the people the enemy of
the state under this USC title 50. By and thru mandatory licensing, regulation of
transactions in foreign exchange of gold or silver to FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES,
property transfers by placing all property under the name of the State such as homes
,vehicles, children, animals, firearms and etc. The Federal and State pretender and or
agents have made a willful presumption of expatriation on the part of the People
therefore denying the People their rights to their lawful standing as an American National.
The court has willfully and knowing concealed this from the people. The following
Congressional Statute at large has given the People protection from foreign state under
the federal constitutional 11th amendment not subject to foreign state.
15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27, 1868.
American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the
government thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this
claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed, Therefore:
Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of
American in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision,
of any officers of a government which denies., restricts , impairs or questions the rights of
expatriation , is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.
(B) the court having jurisdiction over the defendant in the case;
(ii) shall be an officer of the court, and the powers of the Federal Receiver shall include the
powers set out in section 754 of title 28, United States Code; and
(iii) shall have standing equivalent to that of a Federal prosecutor for the purpose of submitting
Title 28 – Google Search

requests to obtain information regarding the assets of the defendant -
(I) from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury; or
(II) from a foreign country pursuant to a mutual legal assistance treaty, multilateral agreement, or
other arrangement for international law enforcement assistance,
provided that such requests are in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Attorney
General.
(c) As used in this section -
The term United States has been defined in Title 28, USC under � 3002 15 (a) as a Federal
Title 28 USC 3002 – Google Search

Corporation CJS Vol 20 � 1785 a Foreign Corporation and substantiated by Supreme Court case
laws.
BLACKS LAWS FIFTH EDTION
FOREIGN STATE; A foreign state within statues providing for expatriation of America
Blacks Law 5th ed – Google Search

citizens who are naturalized under laws of a foreign state in a country which is not the United
States, or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than their own. Kletter v. Dulles,
Kletter v. Dulles – Google Search

D.C.D.C.111F.SUPP.593, 598.
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > � 1101
(14) The term foreign state includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing
dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states.
At no time have the People expatriated his/her self from his country. By and
through the passing of Title 50, USC TWEA all public officials knowingly or unknowingly
have declared themselves to be foreign and did expatriate from the original united
States of America to become a citizen of the UNITED STATES located in the District of
Columbia as defined by the United States Supreme Court in the following case laws.
The high Court confirmed that the term “United States” can and does mean three
completely different things, depending on the context: Hooven & Allison Co. vs. Evatt,
hooven & allison co. v. evatt – Google Search

324 U.S. 652 (1945) & United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876) & United States
US v. Cruikshank – Google Search

SECTION TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 3 > � 23
Title 50 chapter 3 – Google Search

� 23. Jurisdiction of United States Courts and Judges; After any such proclamation has been
made, the several courts of the United States, having criminal jurisdiction, All judgments
against the people fall under criminal.This is why the Courts refuse to answer the challenges of
jurisdiction. Under the TWEA this is but one jurisdiction and that jurisdiction is criminal.
Second; TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 3 > � 21
� 21. Restraint, regulation, and removal. TITLE 50 APPENDIXES — WAR AND NATIONAL
DEFENSE Sec. 16. Offenses; punishment; forfeitures of property(a) Whoever shall willfully
violate any of the provisions of this Act or of any license, rule, or regulation issued there under,
and whoever shall willfully violate, neglect, or refuse to comply with any order
AND
Third; TITLE 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I – CRIMES
CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING
Title 18 RICO – Google Search

(2) Jurisdiction over foreign persons. – For purposes of adjudicating an action filed or enforcing a
penalty ordered under this section, the district courts shall have jurisdiction over any foreign
person, including any financial institution authorized under the laws of a foreign country, against
whom the action is brought, if service of process upon the foreign person is made under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the laws of
the country in which the foreign person is found, and
(A) the foreign person commits an offense under subsection
(a) involving a financial transaction that occurs in whole or in part in the United States;
(B) the foreign person converts, to his or her own use, property in which the United States has an
ownership interest by virtue of the entry of an order of forfeiture by a court of the United States;
or
(C) the foreign person is a financial institution that maintains a bank account at a financial
institution in the United States.
(3) Court authority over assets. – A court described in paragraph (2) may issue a pretrial
restraining order or take any other action necessary to ensure that any bank account or other
property held by the defendant in the United States is available to satisfy a judgment under this
section.
(4) Federal receiver. -
(A) In general. – A court described in paragraph (2) may appoint a Federal Receiver, in
accordance with subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, to collect, marshal, and take custody,
control, and possession of all assets of the defendant, wherever located, to satisfy a civil
judgment under this subsection, a forfeiture judgment under section 981 or 982, or a criminal
sentence under section 1957 or subsection (a) of this section, including an order of restitution to
any victim of a specified unlawful activity.
Section 3); and (Article I section 10 clause 1)The Federal CEO Corporate President of then as
well as of today along with all Federal and State government. Federal Corporation/State
Corporation/Foreign Corporation or doing business as under any other name aka has become a
“domestic enemy” by implementing & reimplementing the Bankruptcy of (1930-32) and “War
and Emergency Powers” (March 9, 1933 and subsequently) and “International Emergency and
War Powers” (1977) in contradiction to Article 4 Section 4; “The United States shall guarantee
to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them
against Invasion (from all enemies foreign and domestic); and on Application of the Legislature,
or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
By and thru the passing of The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933. Title 50, USC
Trading with the Enemy Act Public Law No. 65-91 (40 Stat. L. 411) October 6, 1917.
The original Trading with the Enemy Act excluded citizens of the United States from
being treated as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly within the United
States. The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, however, included the people of the
United States as the enemy by inserting the following citizens within the United
States . The issue of abuse upon the American national(s) comes from the misuses of
Title 50 of the U.S.C. TWEA.
JUDICIAL NOTICE TO THIS COURT
That, We, the people of the States in America has overly provided Congress House and
Senate Judiciary Committees with Evidence and/or Exhibits with NO concern of ANY
“Due Process “Violation of/in the Courts, Judges, Prosecutors, Lawyers, Attorneys, et
al., ect… Evidence of Summies and Documentation will be provided in Discovery after
Scheduling Order Issued.
The Doctrine of Contra Non Valentem
The rule that a limitation or prescriptive period does not begin to run against a plaintiff
who is unable to act usually. Because of the defendants culpable act, such as concealing material
information that would give rise to the plaintiffs claim- Often shortened to Contra Non
Valentem( Case limitation of action key 43,95,CJS Employer- Employee Relationship sec. 87;
Limitation of action sec. 81-84,87,131,138,142,164-165,170-173,175-176,183,198-205;
Physicians, surgeons, and other health-care providers sec. 108, RICO sec 16
COMPLAINT
Now Comes, David Lee; Buess & Rodney Dale; Class a naturalist citizen of the United
States of America whomever rescinded his/her Citizenship to his/her Country. This document
comes in a form of a complaint in the name of David Lee; Buess & Rodney Dale; Class SET
FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUSED BY EMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION
AND THEIR TRUSTEE UNDER THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES
/GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION TITLE 28 SEC.3002 SEC.15(a) GROUNDS FOR INJURY
VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 50 TWEA WAR CRIMES, HATE CRIMES, R.I.C.O. HONEST
SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION &
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATUTES That the actions of the federal Government and
State Government, the federal President and State Governor, the federal Congress and State
legislators and the federal Judiciary and State Judicial branch acting in concert with the Treasury,
DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for the united States of
America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever
(Statutory Jurisdiction) over the People, to the detriment of lawful money in these united States
of America and for Treason, high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II Section 4 and Article III
2. The STATE OF OHIO Law Firm represents REGINALD J. ROUTSON which collected
fraudulent taxes under the heading STATE OF OHIO dba Corporation for the United
States Corporation in the name of the Department of IRS.
3. The STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Law Firm represents Gaston County Tax
Department which collected fraudulent taxes for the United States Corporation for the
Department of IRS under the Treasury Department, which collect for the Federal Reserve
Bank which is also a private Corporation.
4.
The complaint below goes into detail on how the fraud came about and that we are
dealing with the departments/ corporations of the United States under the Judiciary and
judicial procedure manual under Title 28 USC. 3002 15(a) and under the Constitution of the
United States 14th amendment section 3 which was created by the reconstruction Act of
1868. Placing all of the State offices under the jurisdiction of the Federal Corporation know
as the District of Columbia / The United States.
The doctrine of Uberrima Fides; Hold the four rules of fiduciary obligation
1. Must not benefit from their position(s)
2. Must provide full disclosure of all activities
3. May not compromise the beneficiary s interests
4. May not delegate absolute responsibility over their beneficiary s interest
outside of the ten square miles have become co-conspirer in aiding& abating in war
crimes and hate crimes against a united States national(s) with the intent to cause
and/or commit human trafficking on such united States national(s). This
Superior Court of the District of Columbia is an aware that there is no statute of
limitation on fraud, war crimes, hate crimes, human trafficking, R.I.C.O. or
constitutional violation. The United States Bill of Right as found in the District of
Columbia Constitution and in the United Nations charter defines this as acts as crimes
against humanity.
PARTIES OF THE CASE
Respondant-Appellant_QuiTam Private AG Whistleblower Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson-Chergosky for Realestate,Car Title Search’s are the Relators in this State of Minnesota Appellate Action setting
forth claim of injuries
Appelle’s_ United States dba Corporation, Department of the Minnesota Revenue and IRS dba Corporation, STATE
OF Minnesota dba Corporation Law firm State Attorney General Lori Swanson Rule 24.04, Employee of Corporation

. All of the Parties involved:
come under Title 28 USC 3002 15 (a) as department under the United States
Corporation definition
title 28 usc 3002 – Google Search

FOUNDATION & BASES FOR THE COMPLAINT
The MN Government Officials ie: DSI Employee Joel Essling and Cop Tanya Hunter have committed tax fraud upon the Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson by stealing her 91 Chrysler with Disabled License Plates. By and thru the different
departments of the United States Corporation as listed under 28 USC 3002 15 (a). The United
States Corporation created Title 26 of THE UNITED STATES CODES and Title 26 of CODE
OF FEDERAL REGULATION on how they are to tax it own Federal & State employee, aliens,
and corporations as found under 26 USC 6331(a) and the CFR under Title 26
1. The United States dba Corporation is the Law Firm for the Department of IRS
Corporation under the Treasury Department, which collect for the Federal Reserve Bank
which is also a private Corporation.
These are the Corporate laws being missed use by the Corporate employees are the
Delaware Code Title 8 under Corporate Law is Chapter 6 CHAPTER. PROFESSIONAL
Delaware Code Title 8 – Google Search

SERVICE CORPORATIONS section 617 Corporate names The corporate name of a corporation
organized under this chapter shall contain either a word or words descriptive of the professional
service to be rendered by the corporation or shall contain the last names and the Texas
Administrative Code under Corporation Chapter 79 CORPORATIONS Subchapter C. ENTITY
NAMES section 79.31. The amendments to �79.31, which relates to the characters of print
acceptable in a proposed entity name, are required to more specifically identify the capabilities
and limitations in the entry of entity names into the present computer system maintained by the
Secretary of State even the Style Manual created by the Corporation for use of grammar in their
Corporate usage.
.
NOTICE
Notice is being placed into this Superior Court of the State of Minnesota to have it placed on the record of fraud commit by the Corporate employees under the
name of the UNITED STATES aka, Federal Corporation, Foreign Corporation doing
business as the UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. The Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is here by
placed on Notice that the State and Federal ie: Ramsey Co. Auditor Mark Oswald

appointed by the 2nd Judicial Judges , apparantly has committed Bank Fraud, Wire Fraud in the Taxes/Elections of Ramsey County with selective False Statements on the Propertys of Sharon Scarrella Anderson et al and fraudulently took public oath with the intent to expatriate his/ herself with the
intent to created injury and allow fraudulent claim against Sharon Scarrella Anderson and the united States national/s under
Title 50, USC Trading With Enemy Act (TWEA). Sharon et al are coming before this
Superior Court of State of Minnesota for Domestic Terrorism crimes against Sharon and those
who hold these federal public offices. As of date all Federal and State Courts
All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > � 1985
� 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
Delaware Legislation passed a Act called An Act to Provide General Corporate
Law This act created a corporation into a Person with all the same rights as a natural
person to buy, sell, mortgage, receive licenses. Pledges, etc but not to be construed as
a natural person /being. The High Court has rule in three case law that a corporation
can be sued as a Person. SANTA CLARA COUNTY v. SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO., 118
U.S. 394(1886), New York Central R. Co. v. United States, 212 U.S. 481 (1909)
United States v. Dotterweich, 320 U.S. 277 (1943)
Superior Court of the District of Columbia has jurisdiction over this matter as it is not a
State and not represented in Congress and is not part of this country but holds a neutral
position as all parties having a claim against them hold residents and work within the
District of Columbia area and are federal citizens of that District. All crimes and their
planing to injury the people of this nation were within the federal district of District of
Columbia as made subject by the Constitution and not outside of District of Columbia.
All injury originated within this ten square mile area. As no State Court has jurisdiction to
hear such an action. No Federal Court outside of the D.C. or inside of D.C. has
jurisdiction to hear this case as they are a party to this action. The District of Columbia
Constitution and it federal statutes have been violated by all parties named by their
constitutional standing in Article I, II, III of the D.C. Constitution and under the 14th
amendment section 3. This gives the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
jurisdiction over subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction to hear this claim
providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.
(b) For purposes of this section -
(1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a State;
and
(2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to
be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Sec. 1443. Civil rights cases
-STATUTE
Any of the following civil actions or criminal prosecutions,
commenced in a State court may be removed by the defendant to the
District Court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is
pending
:
(1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the
courts of such State a right under any law providing for the
equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all
persons within the jurisdiction thereof;
(2) For any act under color of authority derived from any law
providing for equal rights, or for refusing to do any act on the
ground that it would be inconsistent with such law.
{HYPERLINK “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28.html” \o “TITLE 28 – JUDICIARY
AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28_10_VI.html” \o “PART VI – PARTICULAR
PROCEEDINGS”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28_10_VI_20_171.html” \o “CHAPTER 171 – TORT
CLAIMS PROCEDURE”} >� 2671. Definitions
As used in this chapter and sections {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001346—-000-.html“} {HYPERLINK
“http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001346—-000-.html” \l “b”} and
{HYPERLINK “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00002401—-000-.html“}
{HYPERLINK “http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00002401—-000-.html” \l “b”}
of this title, the term Federal agency includes the executive departments, the judicial and
legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States,
and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, but does
not include any contractor with the United States.
{HYPERLINK “http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode04/usc_sup_01_4.html” \o “TITLE 4 -
FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES”} > {HYPERLINK
“http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode04/usc_sup_01_4_10_3.html” \o “CHAPTER 3 – SEAT
OF THE GOVERNMENT”} > � 72. Public offices; at seat of Government
jurisdiction” as used in reference to subject matter jurisdiction.) Public Law 96-170 Dec
29 1979. AN ACT To permit civil suit under section 1979 of the Revise Statutes(42
USC1983) against any person acting under color of any law or custom of the District of
Columbia who subject any person within the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia to
the deprivation rights, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution and Laws
including & 24 Am Jur 2d District of Columbia � 21 � 21 Superior Court of the District of
Columbia and divisions thereof The District of Columbia Court of General Sessions, the Juvenile
Court of the District of Columbia, and the District of Columbia Tax Court were consolidated in a
single court known as the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Title 28,). (2) by adding at
the end thereof the following new sentence; for the purposes of this section , Any Act of
Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of
the District of Columbia. Sec.2 Section 1343 of title 28 UNITED STATES CODES is amended
(1) by inserting (a) before : The district court . Sec. 1343. Civil rights and elective franchise…
-STATUTE-
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be
commenced by any person:
(1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any
right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of and
conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42;
(2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs
mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to
prevent;
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United
States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within
the jurisdiction of the United States;
(4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress

SET FORTH THIS CLAIM OF
INJURY
CAUSED BYEMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION AND THEIR TRUSTEE UNDER
THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION TITLE 28
SEC.3002 SEC.15(a) GROUNDS FOR INJURY VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 50 TWEA
WAR CRIMES, HATE CRIMES, R.I.C.O. HONEST SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION & THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
STATUTES
NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO THE AGENTS
NOTICE TO THE AGENTS IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPLE
R.I.C.O.
FRAUD, BANK FRAUD, POSTAL FRAUD
CONSPIRACY/OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
TAX FRAUD, MONEY LAUNDERING, WIRE FRAUD, PERJURY,
PETITION IN THE NATURE OF A SUIT FOR DEPRIVATION
OF FEDERALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS TITLE 28, 42 USC 1983, 1981, 1985, 1988,
TITLE18 USC 241, 242, 1512, 1968, 1964, 1918 AND 18 USC SECTION 4 FOR
INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF AND
OTHER DAMAGES AS THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE REASONABLE, LAWFUL,
AND JUST
JURISDICTION
Private Attorney General VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson Attorney Pro Se

Petitioners-Relator QuiTam
Vs ___________________State of Minnesota, All Agencies, Ward Einess, Revenue,

Michael Campion DPS, Mark Oswald Ramsey Co. Auditor,City St.Paul, All Agencies DSI Joel Essling, Cop Tanya Hunter John Doe and Mary Roe, Individually,severally, official capacity , 2008 Tax Delinquent

/s//s/ Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner, aka Mrs. John Wodele, M.Jean Stepan aka Mrs.xxx Tancibel (sp) (105120) Student John Edison UNK. 560 RCGC W. 50 Kellogg Blvd. St.Paul Mn 55102 tel 651-266-3110
UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION
LAW FIRM ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 2053
Department of IRS dba Corporation
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, DC 20224

(A) Appeal from Ramsey district court, 62cv09-1163 (John Vandenorth, Court Reporter Patricia Martinez)
Statute, rule or other authority authorizing appeal: MN Const. Art. X, MS429.061,Rule 24.04,RICO Charges of Bank Fraud,Wire Fraud by Auditor Mark Oswald False Statements.

Date of entry of judgment or date of service of notice of filing of order from which appeal is
taken:8Sept09
Authority fixing time limit for filing notice of appeal (specify applicable rule or statute): 60 Days
Date of filing any motion that tolls appeal time:10Sept09
Date of filing of order deciding tolling motion and date of service of notice of filing:10Sept09
(B) Certiorari appeal.
Statute, rule or other authority authorizing certiorari appeal:
Authority fixing time limit for obtaining certiorari review (cite statutory section and date of
event triggering appeal time, e.g., mailing of decision, receipt of decision, or receipt of other
notice):
(C) Other appellate proceedings.
Statute, rule or other authority authorizing appellate proceeding:
Authority fixing time limit for appellate review (cite statutory section and date of event
triggering appeal time, e.g., mailing of decision, receipt of decision, or receipt of other
notice):
(D)Finality of order or judgment.
Does the judgment or order to be reviewed dispose of all claims by and against all parties,
including attorney fees? Yes ( ) No ( X)
If no:
Did the district court order entry of a final partial judgment for immediate appeal pursuant to
MINN. R. CIV. APP. P. 104.01? Yes ( ) No (X ) or
If yes, provide date of order:
If no, is the order or judgment appealed from reviewable under any exception to the finality
rule? Yes (x ) No ( )
If yes, cite rule, statute, or other authority authorizing appeal:
(E) Criminal only:RICO MS 609 MS609.43, Theft,Trespass,Treason
Has a sentence been imposed or imposition of sentence stayed? Yes ( ) No ( X)
If no, cite statute or rule authorizing interlocutory appeal:
3. State type of litigation and designate any statutes at issue. Constitutionality 429.061, Forfeiture, Eminent Domain,Taxes/Election

4. Brief description of claims, defenses, issues litigated and result below. For criminal cases,
specify whether conviction was for a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony offense.
5. List specific issues proposed to be raised on appeal.
6. Related appeals.
http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

MN 62cv09-1163 � Sharon4anderson s Weblog List all prior or pending appeals arising from the same action as this appeal. If none, so

Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163

September 23, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Lawmen Google Groups http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/quowarranto-a06-1150-30-jun06 ApplBlog5Apr07_71 SharonvCitySt.Paul, Car,Insurance,TitledTheft

http://www.rockyou.com/show_my_gallery2.php?instanceid=133464503

MN Courts www.mncourts.gov Re: Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 2008 697 Sur reyTax ThreatJudge VandeNorth SharonScarrellaAnderson Attorney Pro Se Appeals based on Fraud,Abuse of Disgression Judges As Criminals? Financial Institution Recovery Reform Enforcement Act Google Financial Institution Anti Fraud Enforcement Act Google Regulation Z Google Search Search Search http://taxthemax.blogspot.com All Files @ www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson MS 363AHumanRights Forfeiture Cars etc. Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Copaitkbgs

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites Case Search

john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us

Register of Actions www.mncourts.gov Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 Aff6 Apr07indit Coleman 20 Lantry Stalking19 Apr07

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Related Case: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06 Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs pg.53Forfeiture Cars etc.42 USC 3631 MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct

�
�
�
�
�
�

Case Type:	Administrative File
Date Filed:	02/12/2009
Location:	Ramsey Civil
Judicial Officer:	VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.

Party Information LeadAttorneys jean.@stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us john.edison@co.ramsey.mn.us

Topic Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Legal Notice TaxLetter 62cv09-1163(VandeNorth)2008 EastSideReviewnews 2008TaxDelpg53

Events & Orders of the Court Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09

DISPOSITIONS

02/12/2009

Closed administratively

09/10/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.) http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09

Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

02/12/2009

Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18 pg.7 proof taxes pd $449.93 and $449.13

03/31/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

03/31/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. )

03/31/2009

Affidavit-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18-84-1252842

04/02/2009

Other Document Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

04/06/2009

Affidavit of Service

04/06/2009

Correspondence Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09

04/06/2009

Other Document Sa Affid Hud Hra Fair Ho45pdf

04/06/2009

Other Document 435 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, OTHER PROCEEDINGS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

04/06/2009

Other DocumentTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService did not serve all Parties,Refused Rule 24.04 Constitutionality of Fees/Assessments

04/07/2009

Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )Dm 1399 23

04/09/2009

Notice of Case Reassignment Edward Cleary

04/10/2009

Correspondence

06/26/2009

Affidavit of PublicationTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService

06/26/2009

Other Document

07/06/2009

Publicly Viewable Note to File

07/15/2009

Motion Sa62cv09 1163 Stephan Ans 15

07/15/2009

Memorandum

07/15/2009

Affidavit-Other Auditor Mark Oswald Affidavit 62cv09-1163

07/15/2009

Affidavit-OtherSa 62cv09 1163 Aff Lynn Moser Dtd.8 Jul09 13

07/15/2009

Affidavit of Service

08/10/2009

Affidavit of Prejudice AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge

08/12/2009

Notice of Motion and MotionSharons FactFinding 62cv09-1163 Taxes/Elections

08/13/2009

Other DocumentMotion to Continue 62cv09-1163Judge John Vandenorth

08/17/2009

Motion http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharon4andersonwebnair-20aug09

08/19/2009

Other Document SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court pg26Sharons Letter Motion 62cv09-1163

08/20/2009

Motion Summary Judgment (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

Result: Held

09/09/2009

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/10/2009

Judgment

09/10/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/14/2009

Notice of Appeal

09/14/2009

Other Document

09/14/2009

Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

09/15/2009

Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 15 Sept09 Ifp Implement ECF http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appeal 24pgs

09/18/2009

Supplemental Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/18/2009

Correspondence http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appeal 24pgs.

09/21/2009

Affidavit of Service LetterMotionRequestCourtReporter ECF 36pgs

APPENDIX OF FORMS File4[1]Shar Thune 22 Aitkin Ans0332 27

Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Jrsa 88 Homeless 17 Sharons-DL-07 10

1058 Warrant 34 Trilogy Impeach1992 35

Posted in Blogroll Tagged 62cv09-1163, Appeals, CaseFixing, CitySt.Paul, Clerks, Constitution, CoRamsey, Courts, Felony, Forms, Fred Grittner, Google, Judge John Vandenorth, lawmen, MN, sharon4anderson No Comments Yet

state.

List any known pending appeals in separate actions raising similar issues to this appeal. If
none are known, so state.
7. Contents of record.
Is a transcript necessary to review the issues on appeal? Yes ( X) No ( )
If yes, full (X ) or partial ( ) transcript?
Has the transcript already been delivered to the parties and filed with the trial court
administrator? Yes ( ) No (X )
If not, has it been ordered from the court reporter? Yes (X ) No ( )
If a transcript is unavailable, is a statement of the proceedings under Rule 110.03 necessary?
Yes ( X) No( )
In lieu of the record as defined in Rule 110.01, have the parties agreed to prepare a statement
of the record pursuant to Rule 110.04? Yes ( ) No (X )
8. Is oral argument requested? Yes ( X) No ( )
If so, is argument requested at a location other than that provided in Rule 134.09, subd. 2?
Yes ( ) No ( X)
If yes, state where argument is requested:
9. Identify the type of brief to be filed.
Formal brief under Rule 128.02. ( )
Informal brief under Rule 128.01, subd. 1 (must be accompanied by motion to accept unless
submitted by claimant for reemployment benefits). (X ) Online pdf Format
Trial memoranda, supplemented by a short letter argument, under Rule 128.01, subd. 2. (X )
10. Names, addresses, zip codes and telephone numbers of attorney for appellant and respondent.
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND ATTORNEY
REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR (APPELLANT)
(RESPONDENT)
__/s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se_Privat AG Legal Domicile 1058 Summit Ave. St.Paul,MN PO Box 4384 _55104-0384 tel 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/ http://www.sharonanderson.org/ ECF P165913-sa1299______________________________________________
SIGNATURE
OR, IF NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL:
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF (APPELLANT)
(RESPONDENT)
________________________________________________
SIGNATURE (OF APPELLANT) (OF RESPONDENT)
Dated: Mon. 26Oct09
(The Statement of Case is not a jurisdictional document, but it is important to the proper and
efficient processing of the appeal by the appellate courts. The “jurisdictional statement” section
is intended to provide sufficient information for the appellate court to easily determine whether
the order or judgment is appealable and if the appeal is timely. The nature of the proceedings
below and the notice of appeal determine the jurisdiction of the appellate court. The sections
requesting information about the issues litigated in the lower court or tribunal, and the issues
proposed to be raised on appeal are for the court’s information, and do not expand or limit the
issues that might be addressed on appeal. Likewise, the section asking counsel to identify and
prior or pending appeals from the same case, and any separate appeals that raise similar issues is
intended to provide more information about the procedural history of the case and to ensure that
the court has early notice of other pending related matters in case consolidation is appropriate

FORM 105. PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN COURT OF APPEALS
CASE TITLE: PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Petitioner, Sharon Scarrella Anderson
vs. TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER: 62cv09-1163
Respondent. DATE OF FILING ORDER: 10Sept09
TO: The Court of Appeals of the State of Minnesota:
The petitioner (SharonScarrella Anderson ) requests discretionary review of the (8Sept09) order of the
Ramsey Co. Second Judicial Court. John VandeNorth
1. Statement of facts necessary to an understanding of the issues presented.
2. Statement of the issues. See Above
3. Statement why immediate review of interlocutory or otherwise nonappealable order
necessary. See Above
WHEREFORE, the petitioner requests an order of the court granting the petition for
discretionary review.
DATED:
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND ATTORNEY
REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR PETITIONER
_/s/ Sharon Anderson __ECF P165913 sa:1299_____http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf ___________________
SIGNATURE
(The content requirements of the petition for discretionary review are found in RCAP 105. A
memorandum of law and pertinent lower court documents should be attached to the petition.
The submission and the requirements for filing, form and the number of copies are contained in
RCAP 105.02.State of Minnesota District Court
County Judicial District:
Court File Number:
Case Type:
Plaintiff/Petitioner Affidavit for Proceeding
vs / and In Forma Pauperis
(Minn. Stat. � 563.01)
Defendant/Respondent
1. I am a party in this action. I am a natural person (not a corporation, partnership or other entity).
In good faith, I request a court order waiving court fees and costs. I cannot support my family
and myself and also pay or give security for costs.
2. I believe that I have valid reasons for pursuing this action. My pleadings (the Petition,
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appea MN 62cv09-1163 � Sharon4anderson s Weblog l Complaint, Answer, Appeal or other pleading) are attached.
3. a. I am receiving public assistance under one or more of the following means-tested programs:
MSA (Minnesota Supplemental Assistance Programs);
MFIP (Minnesota Family Investment Program);
Food Stamps;
General Assistance or Discretionary Work Program;
MinnesotaCare, Medical Assistance, or General Assistance Medical Assistance;
Energy Assistance;
b. I am receiving public assistance under some other means-tested program: (Name the program)
I have attached proof that I receive public assistance (such as MFIP card or cancelled check
from agency) or I will provide proof if requested.
XXXc. I receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as a resource for meeting my expenses.
If you checked #3a or 3c and receive help under one of the listed programs, skip to the signature line
on page 2. If you checked #3b and receive some “Other” means-tested assistance, go to Question 4.
4. I am represented by attorney pro se on behalf of Self,
a civil legal services program or volunteer attorney
program, based on indigency. If you checked #4, skip to the signature line on page 2.
5. My family size is ______1_____. (Include yourself, your spouse, your minor children, and other
dependents in your household.) For my family size, I counted myself and (list all others):
Name Age Relationship to you
6. My gross annual family income (before taxes and deductions) is $ 11 thous,which
is less than 125% of the Federal Poverty Line for my family size of ____1_____ Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 members. I have
attached proof of my family income or I will provide proof if requested. If you checked #6, skip re: Affidavits IFP
to the signature line on page 2.
Print Form
CONFIDENTIAL
IFP102 State ENG Rev 9/09 www.mncourts.gov/forms Page 2 of 220fi)

State of Minnesota District Court
County Judicial District:
Court File Number:
Case Type:
Plaintiff/Petitioner Affidavit for Proceeding
vs / and In Forma Pauperis
(Minn. Stat. � 563.01)
Defendant/Respondent
1. I am a party in this action. I am a natural person (not a corporation, partnership or other entity).
In good faith, I request a court order waiving court fees and costs. I cannot support my family
and myself and also pay or give security for costs.
2. I believe that I have valid reasons for pursuing this action. My pleadings (the Petition,
Complaint, Answer, Appeal or other pleading) are attached.
3. a. I am receiving public assistance under one or more of the following means-tested programs:
MSA (Minnesota Supplemental Assistance Programs);
MFIP (Minnesota Family Investment Program);
Food Stamps;
General Assistance or Discretionary Work Program;
MinnesotaCare, Medical Assistance, or General Assistance Medical Assistance;
Energy Assistance;
b. I am receiving public assistance under some other means-tested program: (Name the program)
I have attached proof that I receive public assistance (such as MFIP card or cancelled check
from agency) or I will provide proof if requested.
c. I receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as a resource for meeting my expenses.
If you checked #3a or 3c and receive help under one of the listed programs, skip to the signature line
on page 2. If you checked #3b and receive some “Other” means-tested assistance, go to Question 4.
4. I am represented by attorney on behalf of
a civil legal services program or volunteer attorney
program, based on indigency. If you checked #4, skip to the signature line on page 2.
5. My family size is ___________. (Include yourself, your spouse, your minor children, and other
dependents in your household.) For my family size, I counted myself and (list all others):
Name Age Relationship to you
6. My gross annual family income (before taxes and deductions) is $ which
is less than 125% of the Federal Poverty Line for my family size of _________ members. I have
attached proof of my family income or I will provide proof if requested. If you checked #6, skip
to the signature line on page 2.
Print Form
CONFIDENTIAL
IFP102 State ENG Rev 9/09 www.mncourts.gov/forms Page 2 of 220fi

appropriate appellate court caption. Minnesota Statutes, Section 632.14 provides that appeals
from a final judgment of conviction of the crime of murder in the first degree are taken directly
to the Supreme Court. Rule 29, subdivision 1 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure specifies the
procedure for service and filing of the notice of appeal; subdivision 2 itemizes the contents of the
notice of appeal; subdivision 3 defines the time for taking an appeal; and subdivision 4 cites
other relevant procedures in first-degree murder appeals.)

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson – Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058’s Buzz Activity Page – My Buzz Activity – Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org – Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document’s are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints – http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice – on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson’s Legal

Posted in Sharons Tax/Election Files, Uncategorized Comments Off

Affidavit Prejudice Judge Kathleen Gearin (MN)

October 22, 2009 by sharon4anderson Edit

Sent: 8/9/2009 3:31:33 P.M. Central Daylight Timehttp://s3.amazonaws.com/ppt-download/sa62cv09-1163affpregearin9aug09-090809163337-phpapp01.pdf…

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE RE: Chief Judge 2nd Judicial District
KATHLEEN GEARIN_RICO CHARGES DTD. SUN.9AUG09
To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the
Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202, published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review
STATE OF MINNESOTA, All Agencies,County of Ramsey,All Agencies, City of St.Paul,MN,All Agencies

3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson. http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/ Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Theft Trespass Larceny RICO
Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin – Google Search
pg 8 Paid the full property taxes of $949.86, for 2008. Challenge that Title 18 USC 1001 False charges. By Mark Oswald to “take” HS Credit,

INTENT
It is the intent of this fiduciary to challenge the RICO “BAD BEHAVIOR” of current Judge Kathleen Gearin for the past 24 years in her apparent Lesbian Bias in a “Patterened Enterprise” of Bogus Court Orders contrary to
AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor,State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry ET AL.www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter et al in their Official Capacity‘s, Ind ividually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66 Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NWS2d,562 Plaintiffs

42 USC 3631 to cause Death,Disability,Disparagment of Titles in a RICO Pattern tomalign,injure,terrorize Sharon and her Family or any Pro Se Litigant. http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ admitted to having Homestead Classification since 1992, (17 yrs), Ex. http://sharon4privateattornygeneral.blogspot.com
TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF’S AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES , Legal Notice to Sheriff Bob Fletcher
State of Minnesota )
)ss
County of Ramsey )
VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson first duly sworn on the Graves of Tenants in Common, Murder of 2nd Husband James R. Anderson and ECF165913-Pacer 1299 ,
appears to be a Criminal Defendant in the Property Taxaction re: 62cv09-1163 and that Sharon has good reasons,criminal probable cause to believe and does believe and so states, that because of bias and prejudice on the part of Judge Kathleen Gearin, Chief Judge 2nd Jud. Dist. apparantly one of the Judges in the above named Court, a fair trial and or hearing cannot result, and therefore Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson makes this Affidavit to disqualify said Judge Kathleen Gearin for ALL PURPOSES.

File No. 62-cv09-1163 Case Type: Other Civil and Criminalhttp://www.review-news.com/ and allCandidatesforPoliticalOfficeswww.sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.comwww.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella http://www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com/ http://sharon4council.blogspot.com/ http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 96 Blogs www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and

697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43 St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/ VA Widow, Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella aka Peterson-Chergosky et al

against Kathleen Gearin for her Conspired Coverup of the following Property Ownership 1058 Summit,448 Desnoyer,325 N. Wilder a 6 unit, given Tax breaks for

20 years,2194 Marshall, Buck Lake, Gun Lake, Gull Lake

Propertys for the past 20 years.

/s/ Sharon Scarrella Anderson ECF 165913-sa1299

Sharon will Challenge Jurisdiction/Authority and will only appear by Fax or Telephone Conference on the 20thDay of Aug. before Bias Judge John VandeNorth.

Motions by county Attorney Jean Stepan are techinally false as Stepan has willfully failed to read Sharon’s Motions now Attached and Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin – Google Search

Criminal Section

Conspiracy Against Rights

18 U.S.C. §

241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights
conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it
unlawful for two or more persons to agree
together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a
person in any state, territory or district in the
free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him/her by the
Constitution or the laws of the Unites States,
(or because of his/her having exercised the

Posted in Uncategorized Comments Off

Older Posts »

Free Tim Kinley 62F196163(Cleary) issued Warrants

2010-01-05T12:40:00.000-08:00

Don Mashak's Minnesota 6th Judicial District Free Press: Christian jailed for teaching religion to his children- Minnesota Tim Kinley Speechless Cable Show MN - Google Search

Free Tim Kinley: Hearing 25Jan2010 Court File 62F196163 (Cleary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

Tim Kinley MN

Eva Ng on Speechless with Tim Kinley [clip 4]
10 min - Jun 14, 2009
www.youtube.com

Eva Ng on Speechless with Tim Kinley [clip 1]
10 min - Jun 14, 2009
www.youtube.com

YouTube - TIM KINLEY THROWN IN JAIL

- 2:44pm

Eva Ng on Speechless with Tim Kinley [clip 1]. 171 views .... Loading... johnkhutchison2008 (29 minutes ago) Show Hide. Marked as spam. Reply. tv host of speachless saint paul mn scc cable networks google search bob zick ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVPwQwLg1Bg&feature...twitter -

Cached

YouTube - Eva Ng on Speechless with Tim Kinley [clip 4]

Jun 14, 2009 ... Candidate for St. Paul Mayor Eva Ng visits with Tim Kinley of Speechless. ... Property Taxes in Saint Paul MN - 2009 St. Paul Mayoral Candidate Forum Added to .... Current Location: Worldwide Show locations. Loading. ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9qrlk8Nz2M -

Cached

YouTube - Eva Ng on Speechless with Tim Kinley [clip 5]

Jun 14, 2009 ... Candidate for St. Paul Mayor Eva Ng visits with Tim Kinley of Speechless. ... Study Grp JPC MN Anoka Courts. 96 views .... Current Location: Worldwide Show locations. Loading... Current Language: English Show languages ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VdAfVGNFMU -

CachedQe4vB3NRkKc

Free Tim Kinley 62F196163(Cleary)(Smith)1996

2010-01-05T12:13:00.000-08:00

Re: "taking" Drivers License Constitutionality thereon:

Minnesota Legislature - Office of the Revisor of Statutes

From: Sharon4Anderson
To: askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, askdrlaura@foxnews.com, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, edward.cleary@courts.state.mn.us, joanne.smith@courts.state.mn.us, kathleen.gearin@courts.state.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us
CC: COURTWATCHERS_OF_AMERICA@yahoogroups.com, FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com, newstips@wcco.com, thauser@kstp.com, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us
Sent: 1/5/2010 10:11:23 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: US Dept of Justice Open ltr.Sheriff Bob Fletcher: FREE TIM KINLEYWrit HB

From: Sharon4Anderson
To: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, joanne.smith@courts.state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, .CC: Sharon4Mayor, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, al.carlson@co.ramsey.mn.us, dale.skov@co.ramsey.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, webmaster@am1500.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, gljoe@am1500.com
Sent: 1/5/2010 10:03:12 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: US Dept of Justice Open ltr.Sheriff Bob Fletcher: FREE TIM KINLEYWrit HB

Tues 5Jan2010
To Ramsey County Corrections Superintendent Al Carlson and
Sheriff Bob Fletcher: Michael Campion DPS Media et al
Case Manager Dale Skov
651-266-1409 Fax: 651-266-1412
re: Prisioner Tim Kinley File no 62F196163 (Cleary)(Smith) Incarcerated 20Nov09
Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (Prisoner) - Minnesota Federal forms 203.120SCL - Writ of Habeas Corpus
APPLICABILITY: Minnesota Correctional Facility – St. Cloud (MCF-SCL). INSTRUCTION: MCF-SCL will honor all Writs of Habeas Corpus and Orders for Transportation. ... After these copies are printed, Records staff must email the form to the ... to send the offender to the Intake Unit in "state issue" clothing only. ...
www.doc.state.mn.us/DocPolicy2/FormsWorking/.../203.120SCL.htm - Cached
ISSUES:
1. Is Tim Kinley Political Activist, Candidate MNHouse 55A,Cable_TalkShow Host,Great Father
being held in the Ramsey County Correction (4) 6 months as a Political Prisioner? YES
i. Denied to work on his Cable Show, or work to earn a living
2. Has Judge Edward Cleary exceeded his Authority/Jurisdiction/ Hienous Bias toward
Tim Kinley and others who speak out for Judicial Reform ?
a. Denial of Jury Trial, Evidentary Hearings YES
b. Has Judge Edward Cleary usurped the "Cold Case" http://www.justiceforbarbara.com/
covert coverup of Aaron Foster Grand Jury Indictments of Barb Winn YES
3. Separation of Powers Doctrine: Can the Judicial Department "take" Drivers License
Business Licenses's on Bogus Judgments of alleged Child Support without
Criminal Charges of Car Driving Violations or Criminal Charges of Business Violations ?
4. Cable Show Bob Zick and Nancy Lazaryan 23Dec09 put out a Plea for Tim Kinley
Affiants Channel 15 last nite "Stating Free Tim Kenley Judge Joanne Smith
Judge Joanne Smith v. Tim Kinley MN - Google Search
Judge Joanne Smith Lesbian MN - Google Search
5. For the Health,Safety,Welfare of Tim Kinley and others imprisioned or Committed to State Institutions re: http://www.lufsky.blogspot.com/ and the "Murder"
of http://www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com/
i.
State and Federal Writs of Habous Corpus Forms MN - Google Search
THEREFORE: THE UNDERSIGNED Sharon Scarrella Anderson with Standing as a Concerned Citizen, Victim of the "takings" of Drivers License without Compensation triggering "taking" of 91 Chrysler with disabled license Plates
re: 62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth) A0-2031 (Toussaint_
called the Ramsey Sheriff Bob Fletcher 651-266-9350 Fax: 9351 was told by Noel that
Tim Kinley was transferred to WorkHouse 18Dec09
Call to Workhouse 651-266-1400 Dale Skov 266-1409 Fax 266-1412
who was courteous, File no 62F196163 does not come up at http://www.mncourts.gov/
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back
Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help
Register Of Actions
Case No. 62-F1-96-000163
BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239] §
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Dissolution with Child
Date Filed: 01/23/1996
Location: Ramsey Family Main
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Intervenor
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
ST PAUL, MN 55102
Petitioner
KINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128

08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
Retained
Respondent
KINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128
Removed: 12/24/2007
Ordered

08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
Retained
Respondent
KINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128
Removed: 12/24/2007
Ordered

08/19/1967 DUNN, TIMOTHY W J
Retained
Respondent
KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109

05/26/1958 CLARK, JILL ELEANOR
Retained
Events & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS
12/10/1997
Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)
Converted Disposition:
Related Participants:
KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
07/21/1998
Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)
Monetary Award (Status: Expired, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 07/21/1998, Docketed: 07/28/1998, 1:13 PM, Original Principal: $10,346.99)
05/20/2008
Closed at filing (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W.)
02/09/2009
Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)
02/09/2009
Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00)
02/09/2009
Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Docketed: 03/25/2009, 8:54 AM, Original Principal: $32,403.68)
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
01/23/1996 Converted Filing Fee
01/23/1996 FLD-Case Filed
01/23/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing
02/16/1996 DOC-Document Filed
02/23/1996 Converted Filing Fee
02/23/1996 CRP-Certificate of Representation
02/26/1996 DOC-Document Filed
03/01/1996 Temporary Hearing (9:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/23/1996 RSI-Review for Scheduling Information
04/23/1996 RSO-Review for Scheduling Order
05/23/1996 DOC-Document Filed
05/29/1996 NUL-Null Activity
05/30/1996 AJU-Adjudicated
05/30/1996 DOC-Document Filed
05/30/1996 ORD-Order
06/04/1996 DOC-Document Filed
06/14/1996 DOC-Document Filed
06/21/1996 RSO-Review for Scheduling Order
06/24/1996 DOC-Document Filed
06/28/1996 DOC-Document Filed
07/17/1996 DOC-Document Filed
07/19/1996 DOC-Document Filed
08/12/1996 FSF-Family Scheduling Form
08/13/1996 CANCELED Scheduling Conference (10:00 AM)
Other
08/20/1996 ORD-Order
08/20/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/28/1996 DOC-Document Filed
09/09/1996 ORD-Order
09/25/1996 DRV-ADR Status Review
09/25/1996 ORD-Order
09/26/1996 DOC-Document Filed
11/18/1996 JAS-Judge Assignment
11/18/1996 ORD-Order
11/18/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing
11/18/1996 Pre-trial (9:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
12/06/1996 DOC-Document Filed
01/03/1997 DOC-Document Filed
01/06/1997 ORD-Order
01/07/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
01/27/1997 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM)
Other
02/18/1997 SPT-Schedule Pre-Trial
02/24/1997 CANCELED Pre-trial (9:00 AM)
Other
05/05/1997 DOC-Document Filed
05/12/1997 Pre-trial (1:30 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/13/1997 DOC-Document Filed
06/03/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
06/24/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
06/24/1997 Hearing (9:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/25/1997 Hearing (9:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/28/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/15/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/18/1997 Court Trial (9:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
08/19/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/19/1997 CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM)
Other
09/08/1997 Hearing (1:30 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
12/09/1997 CLO-Closed
12/09/1997 DCR-Decree
12/11/1997 DOC-Document Filed
12/22/1997 DOC-Document Filed
03/09/1998 ARC-Archive
03/23/1998 SCH-Schedule Hearing
04/13/1998 DOC-Document Filed
04/13/1998 DOC-Document Filed
04/17/1998 ORD-Order
04/27/1998 SCH-Schedule Hearing
04/28/1998 CANCELED Hearing (2:15 PM)
Other
05/15/1998 DOC-Document Filed
05/20/1998 DOC-Document Filed
05/21/1998 DOC-Document Filed
05/22/1998 DOC-Document Filed
05/26/1998 Hearing (9:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/13/1998 ORD-Order
07/21/1998 ORD-Order
07/28/1998 JDG-Entry of Judgment
07/31/1998 NOT-Notice
08/12/1998 ORD-Order
08/24/1998 ORD-Order
01/19/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing
01/26/1999 DOC-Document Filed
02/11/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing
02/16/1999 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM)
Other
02/26/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing
03/30/1999 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM)
Other
04/07/1999 DOC-Document Filed
04/09/1999 DOC-Document Filed
04/20/1999 Hearing (10:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/17/1999 ORD-Order
08/19/1999 DOC-Document Filed
05/01/2000 DOC-Document Filed
05/01/2000 POS-Proof of Service
05/01/2000 XPO-Expedited Process
06/08/2000 SUB-Submitted
06/08/2000 Hearing (1:15 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
06/21/2000 AJU-Adjudicated
06/22/2000 ORS-Child Support Order
12/03/2001 SCH-Schedule Hearing
02/08/2002 RAS-Reassignment
02/08/2002 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement
02/25/2002 NOT-Notice
03/04/2002 AFF-Affidavit
03/06/2002 NOT-Notice
03/11/2002 SUB-Submitted
03/11/2002 Hearing (2:00 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/12/2002 DOC-Document Filed
04/15/2002 AJU-Adjudicated
04/16/2002 ORD-Order
04/17/2002 LTR-Letters
04/22/2002 LTR-Letters
04/30/2002 MTN-Motion Filed
04/30/2002 POS-Proof of Service
04/30/2002 XPO-Expedited Process
05/23/2002 NOT-Notice
06/04/2002 LTR-Letters
06/05/2002 LTR-Letters
06/12/2002 LTR-Letters
06/25/2002 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement
07/02/2002 RAS-Reassignment
07/12/2002 NOT-Notice
07/12/2002 POS-Proof of Service
07/12/2002 SUB-Submitted
07/12/2002 XPO-Expedited Process
07/12/2002 Hearing (9:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/13/2002 AJU-Adjudicated
07/13/2002 ORS-Child Support Order
07/16/2002 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM)
Other
07/18/2002 NOT-Notice
07/29/2002 DCS-Dismiss Child Support
07/11/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/26/2003 AFF-Affidavit
08/26/2003 MTN-Motion Filed
08/27/2003 LTR-Letters
08/27/2003 RAS-Reassignment
08/27/2003 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement
09/09/2003 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM)
Other
12/01/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing
12/02/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing
12/05/2003 MTN-Motion Filed
01/12/2004 CANCELED Hearing (9:30 AM)
Other
02/09/2004 MTN-Motion Filed
02/17/2004 AFF-Affidavit
02/23/2004 Hearing (10:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/15/2004 ORD-Order
04/19/2004 AJU-Adjudicated
04/19/2004 ORD-Order
04/30/2004 POS-Proof of Service
04/30/2004 XPO-Expedited Process
05/06/2004 RAS-Reassignment
05/06/2004 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement
06/08/2004 NOT-Notice
06/11/2004 ORD-Order
06/16/2004 SUB-Submitted
06/16/2004 Hearing (2:20 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/08/2004 AJU-Adjudicated
07/08/2004 ORS-Child Support Order
08/09/2004 DOC-Document Filed
08/10/2004 SCH-Schedule Hearing
08/15/2004 RVW-Case Status Review
11/09/2004 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM)
Other
12/29/2004 DOC-Document Filed
01/03/2005 AFF-Affidavit
01/06/2005 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM)
Other
02/17/2005 POS-Proof of Service
02/17/2005 XPO-Expedited Process
03/04/2005 DOC-Document Filed
03/10/2005 Hearing (9:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/23/2005 AJU-Adjudicated
03/23/2005 ORS-Child Support Order
03/23/2005 SUB-Submitted
03/23/2005 Hearing (10:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/18/2005 Hearing (2:30 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/09/2005 SUB-Submitted
05/10/2005 DOC-Document Filed
05/16/2005 SUB-Submitted
07/12/2005 CANCELED Hearing (10:30 AM)
Other
08/08/2005 AJU-Adjudicated
08/08/2005 ORD-Order
08/12/2005 DOC-Document Filed
08/12/2005 LTR-Letters
09/16/2005 SCH-Schedule Hearing
09/21/2005 MTN-Motion Filed
10/07/2005 ORD-Order
11/02/2005 MTN-Motion Filed
11/15/2005 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM)
Other
11/18/2005 NOT-Notice
01/13/2006 DOC-Document Filed
01/19/2006 Hearing (3:30 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
02/03/2006 SUB-Submitted
02/22/2006 AJU-Adjudicated
02/22/2006 CLO-Closed
02/22/2006 ORD-Order
02/28/2006 POS-Proof of Service
02/28/2006 XPO-Expedited Process
03/27/2006 POS-Proof of Service
03/27/2006 XPO-Expedited Process
03/28/2006 AJU-Adjudicated
03/28/2006 CLO-Closed
03/28/2006 ORS-Child Support Order
03/28/2006 SUB-Submitted
03/28/2006 Hearing (8:30 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/07/2006 MCC-Motion for Correct
04/07/2006 POS-Proof of Service
04/14/2006 DOC-Document Filed
04/17/2006 SUB-Submitted
04/20/2006 DOC-Document Filed
04/24/2006 AFF-Affidavit
04/24/2006 ORD-Order
04/26/2006 AJU-Adjudicated
04/26/2006 CLO-Closed
04/26/2006 NUL-Null Activity
04/26/2006 ORS-Child Support Order
04/26/2006 ORS-Child Support Order
04/26/2006 SUB-Submitted
04/26/2006 Hearing (10:00 AM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/15/2006 NOT-Notice
05/23/2006 NOA-Notice of Appeal
05/23/2006 ORD-Order
06/05/2006 ORD-Order
06/15/2006 RVW-Case Status Review
06/22/2006 ORD-Order
07/08/2006 CLO-Closed
07/08/2006 CLO-Closed
07/08/2006 NOT-Notice
07/10/2006 ORD-Order
08/24/2006 ORD-Order
08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed
08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed
08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed
09/13/2006 DOC-Document Filed
09/13/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed
09/15/2006 DOC-Document Filed
09/15/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed
10/16/2006 ORD-Order
10/17/2006 DOC-Document Filed
10/17/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed
10/27/2006 CLO-Closed
10/27/2006 DOC-Document Filed
11/20/2006 NOT-Notice
11/20/2006 POS-Proof of Service
12/11/2006 DOC-Document Filed
12/11/2006 ORD-Order
12/13/2006 LTR-Letters
12/14/2006 NOT-Notice
12/14/2006 ORD-Order
12/18/2006 DOC-Document Filed
12/18/2006 ORD-Order
12/19/2006 SUB-Submitted
12/19/2006 CANCELED Hearing (1:00 PM)
Other
12/19/2006 Hearing (1:00 PM)
Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
01/02/2007 AJU-Adjudicated
01/02/2007 CLO-Closed
01/02/2007 ORS-Child Support Order
01/16/2007 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM)
Other
02/02/2007 DOC-Document Filed
04/03/2007 NOT-Notice
05/23/2007 SCH-Schedule Hearing
06/11/2007 MTN-Motion Filed
06/11/2007 OSC-Order to Show Cause
07/05/2007 NOT-Notice
07/11/2007 ORD-Order
07/16/2007 AFF-Affidavit
09/19/2007 Appellate Court Order
09/21/2007 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel
09/21/2007 Affidavit of Service
09/24/2007 Affidavit-Other
09/25/2007 Hearing (9:00 AM)
09/25/2007 Reset by Court to 09/25/2007
Result: Held
09/27/2007 Order-Other
10/22/2007 Findings and Order
10/30/2007 Notice of Filing of Order
11/06/2007 Motion and Affidavit
11/07/2007 CANCELED Motion Hearing (10:00 AM)
Other
11/16/2007 Appellate Court Order
11/20/2007 Order-Other
12/11/2007 Other Document
12/21/2007 Order Discharging Guardian Ad Litem
12/24/2007 Notice of Case Filing
12/24/2007 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition
12/24/2007 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
12/24/2007 Motion
01/11/2008 Appellate Court Order
02/22/2008 Notice of Hearing
03/20/2008 Order-Other
04/17/2008 Notice of Hearing
05/06/2008 Order to Show Cause Hearing (10:30 AM)
Result: Held
05/12/2008 Notice of Case Filing
05/14/2008 Other Document
05/20/2008 Order-Other
05/22/2008 Notice for Implementation of Cost of Living Adjustment
05/23/2008 Appellate Court Order
06/03/2008 Notice of Case Assignment
06/12/2008 Notice to Remove
06/26/2008 Certificate on Notice of Removal/Affidavit of Prejudice
06/26/2008 Notice of Case Assignment
07/09/2008 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
07/09/2008 Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
07/15/2008 Notice of Motion and Affidavit
07/28/2008 Converted Pending Activity
08/28/2008 Notice of Hearing
11/05/2008 Affidavit-Other
11/05/2008 Other Document
11/05/2008 Affidavit of Service
11/10/2008 Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:30 PM)
11/10/2008 Reset by Court to 11/10/2008
Result: Held
11/10/2008 Taken Under Advisement
11/20/2008 Notice of Case Filing
11/20/2008 Correspondence
11/20/2008 Other Document
12/04/2008 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition
12/04/2008 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
12/11/2008 Appellate Court Order
01/13/2009 Notice of Hearing
02/02/2009 Affidavit-Other
02/02/2009 Affidavit of Service
02/03/2009 CANCELED Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:00 PM)
Settled
02/03/2009 Reset by Court to 02/03/2009
02/09/2009 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order
02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry
02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment
02/12/2009 Notice of Filing of Order
02/12/2009 Affidavit of Service
03/24/2009 Affidavit of Identification
03/25/2009 Processed Judgment Docketing
03/25/2009 Notice of Docketing of Judgment
04/14/2009 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition
04/14/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
04/14/2009 Motion
04/15/2009 Notice of Case Filing
05/01/2009 Appellate Court Order
05/13/2009 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition
05/13/2009 Motion
05/13/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
05/22/2009 Appellate Court Order
06/12/2009 Notice of Motion and Motion
06/12/2009 Affidavit-Other
06/12/2009 Affidavit of Service
06/17/2009 Notice-Other
06/26/2009 Notice of Hearing
08/31/2009 Affidavit-Other
08/31/2009 Affidavit of Service
09/02/2009 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel
09/02/2009 Correspondence
09/03/2009 Motion Hearing (1:30 PM)
07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 07/02/2009
07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 09/03/2009
Result: Held
09/15/2009 Order-Other
09/15/2009 Other Document
09/15/2009 Order-Other
09/15/2009 Order-Other
09/15/2009 Warrant Issued
09/16/2009 Correspondence
09/16/2009 Affidavit of Service
09/29/2009 Notice of Filing of Order
09/29/2009 Affidavit of Service
10/07/2009 Correspondence
11/05/2009 Order-Other
11/23/2009 Warrant Returned
11/25/2009 Order-Other
12/21/2009 Correspondence
12/21/2009 Notice of Appearance
12/21/2009 Motion
12/21/2009 Correspondence
12/24/2009 Notice-Other
01/25/2010 Motion Hearing (10:00 AM)
Financial Information
Obligor KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
Total Financial Assessment 235.00
Total Payments and Credits 235.00
Balance Due as of 01/05/2010 0.00
11/07/2007 Transaction Assessment 55.00
11/07/2007 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2007-01644 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (55.00)
07/15/2008 Transaction Assessment 55.00
07/15/2008 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2008-04419 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (55.00)
04/09/2009 Transaction Assessment 20.00
04/09/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-02614 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (20.00)
05/12/2009 Transaction Assessment 5.00
05/12/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-03566 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (5.00)
12/24/2009 Transaction Assessment 100.00
12/24/2009 Mail Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-09142 CLARK, JILL ELEANOR (100.00)
Petitioner KINLEY, BARBARA A.
Total Financial Assessment 10.00
Total Payments and Credits 10.00
Balance Due as of 01/05/2010 0.00
04/29/2009 Transaction Assessment 10.00
04/29/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-03207 KINLEY, BARBARA A. (10.00)
In a message dated 1/5/2010 10:03:12 A.M. Central Standard Time, Sharon4Anderson writes:
Tues 5Jan2010
To Ramsey County Corrections Superintendent Al Carlson and
Sheriff Bob Fletcher: Michael Campion DPS Media et al
Case Manager Dale Skov
651-266-1409 Fax: 651-266-1412
re: Prisioner Tim Kinley File no 62F196163 (Cleary)(Smith) Incarcerated 20Nov09
Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (Prisoner) - Minnesota Federal forms 203.120SCL - Writ of Habeas Corpus
APPLICABILITY: Minnesota Correctional Facility – St. Cloud (MCF-SCL). INSTRUCTION: MCF-SCL will honor all Writs of Habeas Corpus and Orders for Transportation. ... After these copies are printed, Records staff must email the form to the ... to send the offender to the Intake Unit in "state issue" clothing only. ...
www.doc.state.mn.us/DocPolicy2/FormsWorking/.../203.120SCL.htm - Cached
Tim Kinley - MN refuses to release wrongfully jailed Christian NowPublic News Coverage
Tim Kinley Facebook MN - Google Search
Tim Kinley Sppechless Cable Show MN - Google Search

EmbeJudge Edward Cleary v. Tim Kinley MN - Google Search
USJD_ltr.
Welcome to the United States Department of Justice
Ramsey Co. Corrections Facility MN - Google Search
http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/ACD5E44A-3C7A-4FF5-9289-142E73723DDB/15617/April1420091.pdf page 15
http://www.bjs.state.mn.us/0803RulesCmteFinalReport.pdf
CC: US JUSTICE: B.TODD.JONES (MN) askdoj@usdoj.gov
GOVERNOR tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us
LORI SWANSON Attorney.General@state.mn.us tamar.gronvall@state.mn.us
MN State Court Admnistrator sue.dosal@courts.state.mn.us
fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us
2nd Jud. larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us
JUDGES: kathleen.gearin@courts.state.mn.us john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us gregg.johnson@courts.state.mn.us edward.cleary@courts.state.mn.us et al
COURT REPORTERS: patricia.martinez@courts.state.mn.us bergstrom.courtreporter@court.state.mn.us
SHERIFF: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us ie: Police john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us
ELECTIONS: elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us
julie.kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us
COUNTY ATTORNEYS: rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us
john.edison@co.ramsey.mn.us
CITY ST.PAUL: mayor@ci.stpaul.mn.us chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us
shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us lynn.moser@ci.staul.mn.us
MEDIA: AS INTEREST APPEAR: dorrick@pioneerpress.com rrosario@pioneerpress.com bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com et al
whistleblower@startribune.com
TO THE ABOVE NAMED: Specifically Chief Judge MN Eric Magnuson
Click here: Welcome to the United States Department of Justice
MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF DEPARTMENT LITIGATING COMPONENTS HANDLING CRIMINAL MATTERS

ALL UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Monday, January 4, 2010

FROM: David W. Ogden
Deputy Attorney General
SUBJECT: Requirement for Office Discovery Policies in Criminal Matters
Earlier this year, I asked the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division and the Chair of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee to convene a working group to undertake a thorough review of the Department of Justice’s policies, practices, and training related to criminal case management and discovery and to evaluate areas for improvement. Members of this working group included senior level prosecutors from United States Attorneys’ Offices (USAOs) and Main Justice, Information Technology support personnel, and law enforcement representatives. In addition, members of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee and the Department’s Criminal Chiefs Working Group reviewed and provided comments on the Working Group Report. The case management and discovery working group examined current Department of Justice policies, and surveyed all of the USAOs, the criminal litigating components of Main Justice, and the Department of Justice’s law enforcement agencies, as well as the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, to evaluate current discovery practices, case management practices, and related training, and to identify areas for improvement.
Today, in response to some of the recommendations in the Working Group Report, I sent out a memorandum to all prosecutors that included Guidance for Prosecutors Regarding Criminal Discovery that prosecutors should follow to help ensure that they meet discovery obligations in future cases. This guidance is not intended to establish new disclosure obligations. Those obligations are already set forth in Fed.R.Crim.P. 16 and 26.2, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and 18 U.S.C. §3500 (the Jencks Act). In addition, Department policy provides for broader disclosures of exculpatory and impeachment information than Brady and Giglio require. See USAM §9-5.001. Prosecutors in every district and component must comply with legal requirements and with Department policy. Moreover, there are times when providing discovery broader than that provided for even by current Department policy serves the interests of justice. Providing broad and early discovery often promotes the truth-seeking mission of the Department and fosters a speedy resolution of a case. On the other hand, there are times when countervailing considerations counsel against broad and early disclosure. For these reasons, the discovery guidance is intended to assure that prosecutors make considered decisions about whether to disclose information beyond the requirements of law and policy and when to disclose it.
The Working Group Report recognized that some local variation in discovery practices is inevitable. Inconsistent discovery practices among prosecutors within the same office, however, can lead to burdensome litigation over the appropriate scope and timing of disclosures, judicial frustration and confusion, and disparate discovery disclosures to a defendant based solely on the identity of the prosecutor who happens to have been assigned a case. In many instances, the discovery guidance directs that prosecutors be familiar with circuit and district court precedent and the local rules of the district in which they practice.
In order to assist prosecutors maintain this familiarity and to establish uniform criminal discovery practices within the same office, I am today directing the USAOs and each Department litigating component handling criminal matters to develop a discovery policy that reflects circuit and district court precedent and local rules and practices.
This directive requires each office to establish a discovery policy with which prosecutors in that office must comply. The policy should also provide that specific, case-related considerations may warrant a departure from the uniform discovery practices of the office. Because it is expected that such considerations will sometimes justify a departure from the particular office practice, your policy must set forth procedures prosecutors are required to follow to obtain supervisory approval to depart from the uniform practices in an appropriate case.
Although the format is left to your discretion, the policy should address recurring issues such as: the timing of disclosures; disclosure of reports of interview for testifying or non-testifying witnesses; providing disclosure beyond the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P 16 and 26.2, Brady, Giglio, the Jencks Act, and USAM §9-5.001; the scope of the “prosecution team” in national security cases¹ or cases involving regulatory agencies, parallel proceedings, or task force investigations; storing and reviewing substantive, case-related communications such as email; obtaining Giglio information from local law enforcement officers; disclosure questions related to trial preparation witness interviews; disclosure of agent notes; and maintaining a record of disclosures. I encourage you to seek input from investigative agencies regarding these issues as well.
The Criminal Discovery and Case Management Survey conducted as part of the Working Group’s efforts showed that 90% of USAOs currently have standardized discovery policies or practices, so in many offices this directive requires only that you re-visit or formalize your current policy and revise as necessary to make sure that your policy reflects law and practice and addresses, to the extent appropriate, the issues set forth above.
The Working Group survey showed that 52% of the litigating components reported having standardized discovery policies or practices. I recognize that the litigating components that practice in multiple districts cannot develop a practice to reflect the local rules and practices of each district. Each litigating component should nonetheless develop a policy that guides the discovery practice of the component, understanding that litigating component prosecutors should examine–and in appropriate circumstances defer to–local policy when litigating in a particular district. Component policies should also address as appropriate the topics set forth above.
I encourage you to create or modify your policy as soon as possible, but in any event you are directed to have a revised or new policy in place no later than March 31, 2010, and to provide a copy to the Office of the Associate Attorney General and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. USAOs should also provide a copy to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
I am confident that this effort along with the other steps being taken in response to the Working Group report will facilitate discovery practices that comply with our legal obligations and enhance our ability to achieve justice in every case. Thank you very much for your cooperation in this effort.

¹The Department will be issuing additional guidance on this issue by separate memorandum
Thank You for conversation regarding pdf format for all files and
Tim Kinley 62f196163 I cannot find any files involving Judge Joanne Smith?
Don Mashak's Minnesota 6th Judicial District Free Press: Christian jailed for
Christian jailed for teaching religion to his children - Ramsey County, Minnesota USA
I call upon Governor Pawlenty and Chief Judge Magnuson to cause the release of Tim Kinley before Christmas of this year.

I call upon Governor Pawlenty and Chief Judge Magnuson to expunge the record and forgive all related fines and child support outstanding for Tim Kinley.

I call upon the Ramsey County Bar to provide Tim Kinley with top quality pro bono legal assistance in straightening out all of these injustices. (If for no other reason for being to spinelss to stand up to the corrupt Judges in the first place.

I call upon Governor Pawlenty, Chief Judge Magnuson and the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards to remove Judge Joanne Smith from the bench for life and further for her to be disbarred. I am told that MN Statute 351.02 ( http://twurl.cc/1yjb ) requires that upon any Government official violating their oath of office, their office becomes immediately vacant. Judge Joanne Smith violated her oath to uphold the Constitution. She violated Tim Kinley’s Constitutional Rights knowingly, maliciously and purposefully. Per Statute, she should have been immediately removed from the bench when Tim Kinley won his appeal. I call on whatever Government agency Governor, who is charged with that duty, to perform their duty and remove Judge Joanne Smith from the bench.

The State of Minnesota has failed Tim Kinley. He was the aggrieved party, His wife committed adultery and left him for another man. She took his children. She made untruthful allegations. There is a statute on the books that provides for the criminal prosecution of adulterers. How does the state go from not charging her with that to granting her custody of the children and requiring financial support from the
Re: SCAP : Joanne Smith

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA

Sharons A09-2031 QuiTam Court Complicity Edward Toussaint

2009-12-19T13:04:00.000-08:00

From: Sharon4Anderson
To: fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, frank.magill@usdoj.gov, minneapolis@fbi.gov, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, Kyle.Christopherson@courts.state.mn.us, john.kostouros@courts.state.mn.us, lissa.finne@courts.state.mn.us, mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us, dthoule@redred.com, info@theradiantimage.us, psamdahl@hotmail.com, stan@izoom.net, lbolton1@hotmail.com, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, velma.korbel@state.mn.us, carol.molnau@state.mn.us, brian.mcclung@state.mn.us, steve.sviggum@state.mn.us, clark.dyrud@state.mn.us, dli.commissioner@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, susan.heegard@state.mn.us, cal.ludeman@state.mn.us, webmaster.finance@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, data.center@metc.state.mn.us, webmaster@doc.state.mn.us, webmaster@pca.state.mn.us, deed.customerservice@state.mn.us, dhs.info@state.mn.us, admin.info@state.mn.us, info@dot.state.mn.us, webinfo@mda.state.mn.us, webmaster@mn-arng.ngb.army.mil, alice.seagren@state.mn.us, dan.salomone@state.mn.us, oet.web@state.mn.us, ward.einess@state.mn.us, mhfa@state.mn.us, bms@state.mn.us, mdva.webmaster@mdva.state.mn.us, mde.webmaster@state.mn.us, info@dnr.state.mn.us, michael.pugliese@state.mn.us, sanne.magnan@state.mn.us, tom.sorel@state.mn.us, info@IronRangeResources.org, peter.bell@metc.state.mn.us, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, Dps.webmaster@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen-berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal-ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, swente@republican-eagle.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, citizen.service@ci.stpaul.mn.us, CityofSaintPaul@govdelivery.com, jerry.ludden@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mayor@ci.stpaul.mn.us, erin.dady@ci.stpaul.mn.us, ann.mulholland@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Jean.Karpe@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Anne.Hunt@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Vallay.Varro@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Kris.Fredson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Joe.Spencer@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Darlyne.Morrow@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Chris.Rider@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Nancy.Homans@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Milyon.Tekle@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Nick.Shuminsky@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Carol.Washington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Bob.Hume@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Sean.Johnson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Va-Megn.Thoj@ci.stpaul.mn.us, rway@minnpost.com, sberg@minnpost.com, swaterman@minnpost.com, bhawkins@minnpost.com, dbeal@minnpost.com, brobson@minnpost.com, sjanecek@minnpost.com, info@minnpost.com, mhelms@minnpost.com, ccapecchi@minnpost.com, sschmickle@minnpost.com, rbattle@minnpost.com, jkimball@minnpost.com, dgrow@minnpost.com, minnclips@minnpost.com, jreinan@minnpost.com, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mary.bjornberg@state.mn.us, kwilkening@co.nobles.mn.us, terry.sandbeck@state.mn.us, johnp@alx.tec.mn.us, mitch.lee@state.mn.us, mylan.masson@minneapolis.edu, paul.monteen@state.mn.us, tracey.a.martin@co.hennepin.mn.us, mark.letexier@co.polk.mn.us, john.bolduc@co.crow-wing.mn.us, dan.glass@state.mn.us, brent.richter@state.mn.us, debra.soderbeck@state.mn.us, mdohman@ci.maple-grove.mn.us, sheryl.waddick@state.mn.us, junstad@yahoo.com, carol.j.hall@state.mn.us, mike.ardolf@state.mn.us, bill.martinez@ci.stpaul.mn.us, michael.young@ci.minneapolis.mn.us, peggy.strand@state.mn.us, timbildsoe@visi.com, starr.suggs@state.mn.us, harr@csp.edu, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, tony.bennett@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, jan.parker@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, rob.fulton@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.jackelen@co.ramsey.mn.us, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, indinctax@state.mn.us, salesuse.tax@state.mn.us, withholding.tax@state.mn.us, minnesotacare.tax@state.mn.us, insurance.taxes@state.mn.us, special.taxes@state.mn.us, businessincome.tax@state.mn.us, mdor.collection@state.mn.us, dave.thune@ci.stpaul.mn.us, pat.harris@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Lee.Helgen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, eva@evaformayor.com, Sharon4Mayor, BillDahn4Mayor, bob@calhouncompanies.com, will@willrossbach.com, aonealpha@yahoo.com, mayorlongrie@yahoo.com, jtstiles@gmail.com
CC: larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us
Sent: 12/19/2009 2:15:46 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: MNJudicial BranchA09-2031SharonAndersonvCityCountyMN

Click here: Minnesota Judicial Branch http://www.mncourts.gov/

Sat.19Dec09

YouTube - Sharon4Anderson's Channel#p/a/u/1/m0ye1YleOik

HAPPY HOLIDAYS

Merry Christmas Happy New Year 1959 to YES AFFIANT HAS RECORDS FROM 50 YEARS AGO.

Sharon4Judge Blogger: Dashboard

TO: The Above named :Sue Dosal,Staff,Court Employees in their Official Capacities, Severally, Individually, John Doe and Mary Roe.
State Court Administrator's Office

Issues: Affiant Sharon4Anderson demands Equal Treatment, Due Process re: MN Electronic Filings Hennepin Co - Google Search, must also be implemented in http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/

Verily believes Full Compliance has been obtained and the Matter must move forward.

as alleged Deficancy's are Published with Good Faith and as Whistleblower Relator.

If in Fact the Lower Ramsey Co. Dist. Court has wilfully failed to file documents, acting complicit with DFL County Attorney Susan Gaertner to coverup the Fact Taxes were paid,

Constitutional Challenge of Illegal Fees/Assessments "taken" by Theft,Trespass,Treason.

91Chrysler,Trailer,Camping Equipment even porta potty is BIZZARE.

Any All IFP Documents are to be served by Sheriff Bob Fletcher, All 89 Doc at www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/ and http://www.sharon4anderson.org/ + Blogs

Affiant assumes: Published APL= Appellant NOA=Notice of Appeal SharonsAppeal 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) 28 pgs

SCA= Statement of Case

Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163 11 pgs.

IFP= Informa Pauperous SharonsIFP_62cv09-1163_Appeal 24 pgs.

7 copies APB must be served electronically

LEGAL NOTICE TO JOIN WITH Citation no. 905191492 Affiant making a R. Hand Turn from a R.Hand Lane as Retired Judge Larry Cohen complicit

with his Court Clerk, City Attorney Judy Hanson wilfully failed to issue Order

Taking Shar DL 2005

Criminal/Traffic/Petty Case Records Search Results

Logout Search Menu New Criminal/Traffic/Petty Search Search Criteria: 905191492

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help

Case Number Citation Number Defendant Info Filed/Location/Judicial Officer Type/Status Charge(s)

62-T0-05-011101

905191492

ANDERSON, SHARON LEA

01/27/1939

04/13/2005

Ramsey Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown

Moving - Petty Misd

Converted Closed

ILL PASSI ON RT [115]

TICE: TO JOIN WITH Citation 905191492 2005

Sue Dosal,
State Court Administrator

Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Administrator's Office Branch. She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982. Prior to her appointment she served as Senior Staff Attorney for the National Center for State Courts, Deputy State Court Administrator for the state of Florida, Staff Director of the Florida Legislature’s Joint Select Committee on Judicial Personnel, and staff asso

State Court Administrator's Office
(651) 296-2474 (phone)
(651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form

Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 5515

CC: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us
Sent: 8/12/2009 1:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time

FAX TRANSMITTAL Resubmit Sat.19Dec09

Wed 12Aug09 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us

2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278

Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301

Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177

Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010

Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155

St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574

and all others as their interest appear.

FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES PGS.20

Mon.10Aug09 RESubmitt Sat 19Dec09

CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/

SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others

WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections

US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to Poverty, QuiTam Whistleblower Today Sat.19Dec09 it has been brought toAffiants Attention that an "Order" was Issued 7Dec09 Never received by Affiant_Appellant_VA Widow Whistleblower to Remedy Deficiency's

Help

Case View

ORCA Info

Case Information

Case Number: A092031 Filing Date: 11/06/2009

Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals Status: Pre-Briefing

ORCA: Civil Division Ramsey County District Court Hearing Type: Nonoral

Classification: Standard - Civil - Other

Short Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner

Full Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:

Citation:

+ Display Party Information

Docketing Filter View

Display:

Docket Information

Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status

Order - Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court's 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Court of Appeals 12/07/2009 Order Remedy Deficiencies Final

Transcript - Delivery Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 11/19/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final

Notice - Case Filing Court of Appeals 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final

Statement - Case - Appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Statement Case - Appellant Final

Notice - Appeal - Case Filed Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Notice Appeal - Case Filed Final

Transcript - Initial Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 10/15/2009 Transcript Initial Certificate Final

CC: Sharon4Mayor, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, ron.guilfoile@ci.stpaul.mn.us, minneapolis@fbi.gov, info@judicialwatch.org, JURIST@law.pitt.edu
Sent: 8/5/2009 1:33:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: 1058 Warrant 34_LEGAL NOTICE TO PDF RamseyDist.Crt.62cv09-1163 A09-2031

Click here: 1058 Warrant 34

Wed.5Aug09

Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us John.Vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us

fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us

In the Serious Matter of Judicial Administration re: Ramsey District Co. File

62cv09-1163 Prosecutorial Misconduct

Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al

Candidates Plea to implement pdf ECF Filings in the 3 thousand propertys published 697 Surrey is on pg 53 and other Files for the past 20 years.

Candidate 4 St.Paul Mayor Affiant_ Relator_VA Widow_Whistleblower_Victim

Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se-InFact_PrivateAG cannot interpose

proper Answers without ID Court Records in the File.

East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163 go to www.mncourts.gov top access to court records Access Case Records scrool to bottom click on I accept click civil records type in 62cv09-1163 click on upper left link

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help

Register of Actions

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163

Events & Orders of the Court

SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-SCARRELLA
http://sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com http://sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ http://www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/

PS. The City Council Agenda's are in pdf and Video format4forensic evidence

City of St. Paul, MN - Official Website - Council

http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40

Ramsey County CB-CC

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

Sharon4Anderson62-TO-05-011101 v. Judge Larry Cohen,Judy Hanson

2009-12-19T08:38:00.000-08:00

2.724, 2009 Minnesota Statutes

Bull services, business, intelligence, solutions, systems, Integration, consulting, dashboards, data, warehousing, medicaid, IT, health, human, services, justice, public, safety, Integrated, court, judge's, tax, information, technology, bull, outsourcing Bull

ACLU of MN Lantry St. Paul Inspection

LEGAL NOTICE TO JOIN WITH A09-2031 RE: "5TH AMEND "TAKINGS"

QUESTIONS:

HOW CAN THE CITY ST.PAUL "take" DL without Court Order, then Steal Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys by Theft,Trespas,Treason?

Criminal/Traffic/Petty Case Records Search Results AFFIANT RECENTLY FOUND THIS CHALLENGED TRAFFIC CASE; PUBLISHED WITH LIBEL,MALICE AND FRAUD ON THE CITIZENERY.546.27, 2009 Minnesota Statutes LIEP+FileEssling+001.jpg (image)

546.27 DECISION BY THE COURT.171.18, DL Hearing Code-Corruption

The Bodies Politic: On the Mend

By City Hall Scoop on April 11, 2007 11:04 PM No Comments No TrackBacks

More than 30 years after George Latimer followed Larry Cohen into the mayor's office in St. Paul, he's still on Cohen's trail.
These days, though, its at the Shalom Home nursing facility on Midway Parkway.
The Scoop went up there Wednesday afternoon to find two of the city's most renowned former mayors recuperating, just a few doors apart in the same wing of the home.
Latimer had a hip replaced last week and is sporting a pair of nifty blue shorts and dashing white support hose.
Cohen is recovering from a fall that resulted in a pretty serious head injury during the winter, although it didn't catch up to him until a Carribean vacation.

Subdivision 1.Written decisions required.

(a) When an issue of fact has been tried by the court, the decision shall be in writing, the facts found and the conclusion of law shall be separately stated, and judgment shall be entered accordingly. Except as provided in paragraph (b), all questions of fact and law, and all motions and matters submitted to a judge for a decision in trial and appellate matters, shall be disposed of and the decision filed with the court administrator within 90 days after such submission, unless sickness or casualty shall prevent, or the time be extended by written consent of the parties. No part of the salary of any judge shall be paid unless the voucher therefor be accompanied by a certificate of the judge that there has been full compliance with the requirements of this section.

(b) If a hearing has been held on a petition under chapter 260 involving physical or sexual abuse of a child who is alleged to be in need of protection or services or neglected and in foster care, the decision must be filed within 15 days after the matter is submitted to the judge.

Subd. 2.Board of judicial standards review.

At least

Sharon (image)

Heinous Abuse of Court Retired Senile Judge Larry Cohen http://www.lying-lawyers.blogspot.com/ acting in concort with City Attorney Judy Hanson ,who covered up the Fact Cyr Abarham was not a LicensedCop, Denial of State Laws MS 171.02 DL validity MS 171.16 30 days suspension

MS 645.Canons of Construction FACTS Retired Judge Larry Cohen has never issued an Order or Served upon Affiant.MS 546.27_90dayOrder

Sharon Anderson v. Judge LarryCohen City Attorney Judy Hanson - Google Search

Logout Search Menu New Criminal/Traffic/Petty Search

Search Criteria: 905191492

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Logout Search Menu New Criminal/Traffic/Petty Search Back

Case Number	Citation Number	Defendant Info	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status	Charge(s)

62-T0-05-011101	905191492	ANDERSON, SHARON LEA 01/27/1939	04/13/2005 Ramsey Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown	Moving - Petty Misd Converted Closed	ILL PASSI ON RT [115]

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search