<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Clicking Chick</title>
	
	<link>http://www.clickingchick.com</link>
	<description>Clicking Chick: Getting People To Click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ClickingChick" /><feedburner:info uri="clickingchick" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>What’s Cheaper, SEO or PPC?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/v7QyAvOJD5k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/whats-cheaper-seo-or-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I was saying earlier this week, people often get confused and misinterpret costing around SEO services and PPC services. Most industry folks will tell you that SEO is more expensive up front, but cheaper over time, because with PPC you have to continue to pay for your traffic.
This is both true and not true. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I <a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/seo-and-ppc-bert-and-ernie-or-skywalker-and-vader/">was saying earlier this week</a>, people often get confused and misinterpret costing around SEO services and PPC services. Most industry folks will tell you that SEO is more expensive up front, but cheaper over time, because with PPC you have to continue to pay for your traffic.</p>
<p>This is both true and not true. Find out why so you can be a savvy services shopper. (Hmm. That sounds like a great category name, no?)</p>
<h2><span id="more-129"></span><span style="color: #ff6600;">How PPC Cost Is Constructed</span></h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for hard dollar amounts, I&#8217;m sorry to say, you won&#8217;t see those. Firms are so vastly different in their pricing strategies and package prices, there&#8217;s no way to say. But, here&#8217;s what I can tell you: what goes into PPC, and how MOST firms will break out charges.</p>
<p>PPC Cost always includes what you pay per click. This can be higher or lower, depending on things like your vertical, and how good your campaign is running &#8211; in Google, that&#8217;s your Quality Score, and it dramatically affects your bid costs. (You can read more about why you should seriously give a big crap-ola<a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/keyword-quality-scores-why-you-ultimately-should-care-hint/"> about quality scores here</a>.)</p>
<p>Beyond your per-click cost, you&#8217;ll be paying a vendor to manage it. Most vendors charge you in one of two ways: a) a flat fee of what you spend total in a month on your clicks or b) a per keyword charge. You&#8217;ll likely have a setup fee, and then additional charges for campaign expansions, etc.</p>
<p>The other charges you may incur are incidental, depending on  whether you have an in-house designer or not. The cornerstone of most successful PPC campaigns are the landing pages, and someone&#8217;s gotta design &#8216;em.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">How SEO Cost Is Constructed</span></h2>
<p>I won&#8217;t lie, SEO can get expensive. Like I said, the search industry belief is that SEO is way less expensive over time, and I tend to agree. The hard part is swallowing the price tag, because it&#8217;s a LOT of manual work.</p>
<p>Usually the initial SEO of your site is a flat cost. Most proposals I see are custom-made because every site is so different, and different verticals means a whole set of challenges that are unique to each client. Why&#8217;s the price tag so big? Here&#8217;s what is usually includes:</p>
<p>- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Keyword research and implementation.</span> This means finding keywords that are viable and you stand a chance to rank for, and then going through your site extensively to implement them. This is everything from writing content, to re-naming your pages.</p>
<p>- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Site architecture</span>. This means making sure the coding aspects of your site support SEO efforts&#8230;.so, no menus in images or javascript, proper 301 redirects in place, blah blah blah.</p>
<p>- <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Off page optimization.</span> This means directory submissions and link building, and frequently there are other costs associated with that because there are a lot less freebies than there used to be.</p>
<p>All in all, you&#8217;re easily looking at a price tag of a few grand for a really good initial SEO foundation for your site.</p>
<p>The thing about SEO is that you don&#8217;t achieve a ranking and keep it forever. So you&#8217;ll likely wind up having ongoing maintenance charges, and that can vary widely. Perhaps your SEO firm has you implement a blog to keep keyword-rich content flowing. Are you going to maintain that, or pay them to? You&#8217;ll need ongoing link building and participation on blogs and in forums to get your site out there. Are you going to maintain that, or pay them to?</p>
<p>The best online marketing is going to have a combination of both. Normally a site will start out with SEO to get that going, and use PPC in the interim to drive traffic. Once they start ranking orgnically, they&#8217;ll dial back on the PPC budget.</p>
<p>I know, getting into spend a cool few grand starts feeling like serious business, and it is. It&#8217;s a lot of work, and it takes patience because good campaigns and good rankings take time. Don&#8217;t give up. Also, vet your people thoroughly, and be sure to come back for my advice on finding a good SEO and PPC vendor. I won&#8217;t let &#8216;em screw ya.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/ClickingChick"><img src="http://www.twitterbuttons.com/images/lbn/twitterbutton-0104.gif" title="By: TwitterButtons.com" width="142" height="48" /></a><br /><a <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/v7QyAvOJD5k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/whats-cheaper-seo-or-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/whats-cheaper-seo-or-ppc/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Tools You’re Not Using Lesson 5</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/_wqDzeV3yrY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In keeping with yesterday&#8217;s theme of PPC and SEO as joint tactics, it&#8217;s probably appropriate to highlight a key tool in your PPC efforts: your organic search results.
Ok, I know&#8230;you&#8217;re likely using paid search stuff because you can&#8217;t rank organically for some stuff. That&#8217;s ok, but you&#8217;d be surprised how much you&#8217;ll learn about your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In keeping with yesterday&#8217;s theme of PPC and SEO as joint tactics, it&#8217;s probably appropriate to highlight a key tool in your PPC efforts: your organic search results.</p>
<p><span id="more-136"></span>Ok, I know&#8230;you&#8217;re likely using paid search stuff because you can&#8217;t rank organically for some stuff. That&#8217;s ok, but you&#8217;d be surprised how much you&#8217;ll learn about your site and some marketing if you check out the keyphrases that you rank for organically. (By the way, amusing terms will often show in that regard. <a href="http://ittybiz.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-seo/" target="_blank">Just ask Naomi</a>.)</p>
<p>For my SEO clients, I provide the top organic terms they rank for every month. A lot of times it&#8217;s the name of the company, so set that aside. Where it gets interesting is when you: 1) see terms you&#8217;re not bidding on or 2) realize customers search for you differently than you categorize yourself.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Seeing keywords you&#8217;re not bidding on.</span></h2>
<p>I audited a campaign for a dental company once upon a time, for example. Terms like &#8220;dentures&#8221; did well, and despite the keyword research for their verticals, these were extremely large campaigns and some keywords were bound to fall through the cracks. They had a few denture-related terms, mostly things related to affordable and stuff like that. I asked to check out their Analytics.</p>
<p>I checked the first few organic words, and found they were ranking really well for them. So instead, I skipped to some stuff lower down on the list&#8230;things that weren&#8217;t getting tons of traffic, but enough visits that it wasn&#8217;t a fluke. It started to uncover patterns where dental  insurance plans were being searched along with the denture terms. This opened up a whole new ad group for them, focusing on two new areas they hadn&#8217;t been touching previously. This might sound like a &#8220;well duh&#8221; moment, but this was a national company, and a lot of time there are chasms in that stuff when it&#8217;s a locally-oriented terms. A marketing person sitting in Washington probably isn&#8217;t thinking about a dental plan that exists in Maryland. With organic keywords though, it tells them to think about it. Voila &#8211; new search terms added to the Maryland campaign to cast that net just a little wider.Seeing</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Seeing variations of terms you hadn&#8217;t considered.</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">One of the harder things you&#8217;ll do as a business is owner is to ditch the owner&#8217;s hat and think like a potential customer. It&#8217;s hard for most business owners, and I know I&#8217;m no exception. I can&#8217;t assume that people who search for SEO even know what that is. I have to step back and say &#8220;They don&#8217;t want SEO. They want to show up in the search engine rankings.&#8221; (And I have to not use the word SERP, because this same group doesn&#8217;t know that stands for Search Engine Result Pages.)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">It&#8217;s incredibly important that you pay attention to how customers look for your services. As a business owner, it&#8217;s so easy to get in the mindset that you have to look better than your competition&#8230;and you wind up talking in speak that your competitor will understand. While you&#8217;re trying to make them shake in their boots by talking about your latest hydraulic system for industrial steel doors, you&#8217;re losing a building contractor who is working his first job and needs a door supplier. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">In other words, be aware how your CUSTOMERS would search for you, not how YOU would search for you. I once worked with a small apartment company that specialized in short-term rentals &#8211; usually for folks that relocated for a job, or had a house fire and their insurance company was giving them living expenses while the house was repaired, things like that.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">They swore up and down they weren&#8217;t a version of Extended Stay hotels, and things of the like.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">Ok, they weren&#8217;t, because they were actual apartments and a lot nicer. But guess what? Consumers don&#8217;t know that. They have no clue why you&#8217;re different apart from the price tag. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">They also swore up and down they only did short term rentals and not long term rentals.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">Ok: define that for me. Your definition of those terms are exact, but they&#8217;re more fluid for customers. Is short term 30 days? 90 days? What&#8217;s long term? You don&#8217;t know what THEY consider those terms. Forget what your internal corporate definition is, because your searchers are not mind readers.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">Let your customer&#8217;s fingers be your guide.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">If you look at your organic terms (even if you&#8217;re not ranking well yet) you&#8217;ll get a lot of insight. In many ways, you&#8217;re just employing the age-old practice of what you should do: listening to your customers.<br />
</span></span></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/ClickingChick"><img src="http://www.twitterbuttons.com/images/lbn/twitterbutton-0104.gif" title="By: TwitterButtons.com" width="142" height="48" /></a><br /><a <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/_wqDzeV3yrY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-5/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO and PPC: Bert and Ernie or Skywalker and Vader?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/J9yOwHSNfPM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/seo-and-ppc-bert-and-ernie-or-skywalker-and-vader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you really get down to it, getting people to your website is about words.
I know, that sounds so boring. It&#8217;s not as slick and sexy as words like &#8220;keyphrase research&#8221; or &#8220;linkbuilding&#8221; or &#8220;black hat techniques&#8221; but it&#8217;s the truth. Whether you&#8217;re engaging in SEO or PPC or both, search engines rely on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you really get down to it, getting people to your website is about words.</p>
<p>I know, that sounds so boring. It&#8217;s not as slick and sexy as words like &#8220;keyphrase research&#8221; or &#8220;linkbuilding&#8221; or &#8220;black hat techniques&#8221; but it&#8217;s the truth. Whether you&#8217;re engaging in SEO or PPC or both, search engines rely on the use of words to figure out what the heck your site is about in the first place.</p>
<p>So what good does that do you? To get a whole list of words, and then stare in the face of complicated tools like SEO and PPC, with a few bucks in your hand and no clue which path to throw it towards? Here&#8217;s my advice.</p>
<h2><span id="more-127"></span><span style="color: #ff6600;">Get realistic about your keywords</span></h2>
<p>If you have a 10 page site and want to rank for &#8220;realtor,&#8221; you might as well attempt to rank for the word &#8220;the.&#8221; It just won&#8217;t happen. You&#8217;re a small fish in a massively huge, shark-infested ocean the size of Saturn. (I don&#8217;t know exactly how large Saturn is, but it&#8217;s big. It also freaked me out in college to learn that it&#8217;s less dense than water, so if you submerged it in water, it would float. Freaky.)</p>
<p>You have to be realistic about what you&#8217;re going to be able to rank for organically. When you do your keyword research, go ahead and log all the keywords you know apply to you or that you might be interested in, and note the searches per day plus the competition. That kind of information is helpful for both your organic and pay-per-click marketing plans. The overall competition will give you an idea as to overall competitiveness, because odds are good if it&#8217;s a rat race in the organic world,  it&#8217;s going to be a rat race in the paid one.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">So you have this keyword list&#8230;</span></h2>
<p>I recommend you put it in Excel, and sort them based on the column of competition first. Yes, searches per day are important, but they&#8217;re irrelevant if you&#8217;re choosing words that have too many other people aggressively going after them. You&#8217;re a 10 page realtor, site, remember that.</p>
<p>So you see &#8220;realtor&#8221; has 16,000,000 pages in competition or something. That&#8217;s out. Your 10 pages won&#8217;t get you there, even if you make 1,000 more pages over time.</p>
<p>Maybe then you see something like &#8220;realtor for farmers.&#8221; Do you specialize in helping people find farmland? Hmm. Why yes. You do. You  look at the competition&#8230;.let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s 80,000 pages. (These numbers are hypothetical, in case that&#8217;s not evident. I don&#8217;t need a bunch of SEO Geeks informing me I&#8217;m wrong &#8211; this is for illustrative purposes you dweebs. Back off.)</p>
<p>So, 80,000 pages isn&#8217;t quite so bad. And let&#8217;s say they get 50 searches a day. 50 searches times 30 days means there are about 1500 searches a month. Not bad, right?</p>
<p>Finding those diamonds are what you want to target for SEO. There will always be competition, but if you dig enough, you&#8217;ll find longer-tail keywords that have decent search volume and lower compeition. There&#8217;s an added benefit there as well: they&#8217;re more specific.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t start whining. I know you want tons of traffic and to have your website explode into being the only sales vehicle you&#8217;ll ever need but in this era, specific is better. If you drive a single person searching for &#8220;realtor&#8221; to your site over 6 months versus 5-10 a month that searched for &#8220;real estate for farmers,&#8221; guess which one is more likely to call? Right. There are eight bazillion realtors (a lot of whom are pissing themselves because of the housing market) but there are way less for those that specialize in farmer needs.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Can I bid on what I can&#8217;t rank for organically?</span></h2>
<p>Ok, here&#8217;s where people also tend to go a little nutso. They want to bid on &#8220;realtor&#8221; because they know they can&#8217;t rank for it. This can be a strategy, but again: be realistic and think of the long tail on your market.</p>
<p>If you specialize in selling condos in Minneapolis, why would you bid on &#8220;realtor&#8221; running nationwide? Your clicks will be insanely expensive and you&#8217;d be mostly marketing to people who don&#8217;t at all qualify for what you have. Quell your ego, and construct a PPC campaign that is smart: bid on condo realtor related keywords, and geotarget your ads for Minneapolis. You&#8217;ll reach a broader audience for competitive terms that way, but still keep yourself into that defined area of marketing to people that are qualified for your service.</p>
<p>Which way is cheaper?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s this ongoing battle about whether SEO or PPC is more expensive. Frankly, it depends on so many things, I can&#8217;t even begin to lay it out in this entry. I&#8217;ll detail it out for you in another one. That said, BOTH of these methods are an ongoing process. There&#8217;s no quick way to rank organically, and while your ads start showing in PPC quickly, having the best-performing campaign possible also takes time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d always recommend a combination of both, assuming that PPC is a viable form of advertising for your product. (Hey, sometimes it&#8217;s not.) I&#8217;ll do a more specific breakout on how costs of these boil down, too. It&#8217;s also worth it to note that you will find oddities in the how sites are ranked compared to what they are, as is the case with my buddy Dave Doolin. Find out how a search for his site name (which is an awesomely helpful site about WordPress and other assorted design things) <a href="http://website-in-a-weekend.net/building-traffic/black-magic-seo-vampire-weekend-sucks-serps/">brings up ones about vampires instead</a>. No, I&#8217;m not kidding.</p>
<p>In the meantime, you can also<a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/so-what-keywords-do-i-bid-on/"> read more about knowing which fancy-pants keywords you should and shouldn&#8217;t be bidding on here.</a></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/ClickingChick"><img src="http://www.twitterbuttons.com/images/lbn/twitterbutton-0104.gif" title="By: TwitterButtons.com" width="142" height="48" /></a><br /><a <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/J9yOwHSNfPM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/seo-and-ppc-bert-and-ernie-or-skywalker-and-vader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/seo-and-ppc-bert-and-ernie-or-skywalker-and-vader/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Tools You’re Not Using Lesson 4 – Because It’s New!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/GOx_jTjwfbA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-4-because-its-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ad Copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See? Even for people like me that do this stuff day in and day out&#8230;there&#8217;s always something new.
Maybe this is really lame, but it&#8217;s why internet marketing keeps me like a kid on Christmas morning. It&#8217;s why, when my other friends bitch about grinding boring stuff out in their cubicles all day, I can still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See? Even for people like me that do this stuff day in and day out&#8230;there&#8217;s always something new.</p>
<p>Maybe this is really lame, but it&#8217;s why internet marketing keeps me like a kid on Christmas morning. It&#8217;s why, when my other friends bitch about grinding boring stuff out in their cubicles all day, I can still get out of bed and be appreciative that I work in such a cool industry. One that changes. For the better. I doubt if I worked for GM I&#8217;d feel quite so enthusiastic.</p>
<p>Anyway, Google is starting to show signs that yes, they are paying attention to AdWords again. It&#8217;s been pretty quiet on the AdWords front, aside from the introduction of quality scores four score and seven years ago&#8230;now, a new feather in the cap has emerged for &#8220;high quality&#8221; accounts.</p>
<p><span id="more-122"></span></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like most people wanting to run AdWords, there&#8217;s so much you want to say in your ads. PPC forces you to get really concise about what you want to say in those wee lines of characters, which can be hard. If you have a few great deals going, you really only have enough space to call out one. That sucks, right? If you&#8217;re selling a  line of sock monkeys and more than one is one sale, communicating that in a teensy ad is tough.</p>
<p>AdWords has rolled out something to what they elusively deem as &#8220;high quality&#8221; accounts. It allows for extra text links if you&#8217;re in the oh-so-holy and oh-so-coveted first place, highlighted area at the top of a search results page. You get up to four extra links to go wherever you&#8217;d like on your site.</p>
<p>Apparently Priceline.com is one of these accounts. Here&#8217;s what it looks like in action:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="googleadwords_sitelinks" src="http://www.clickingchick.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/googleadwords_sitelinks.jpg" alt="googleadwords_sitelinks" width="719" height="84" /></p>
<p>Pretty neat-o, right?</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get any kind of notification if you&#8217;re eligible for these babies, so you gotta check yourself. Here&#8217;s how:</p>
<p>1. Log into your account. (Sorry, I guess that&#8217;s redundant.)</p>
<p>2. Click on your &#8220;campaigns&#8221; tab.</p>
<p>3. There&#8217;s a little, easy-to-miss line there called &#8220;networks, devices and extensions.&#8221; Click on that sucker.</p>
<p>4. If you&#8217;re among the chosen to have this tool, you&#8217;ll see an &#8220;ad extension&#8221; option. When you click on that, there&#8217;s a very simple screen. I&#8217;d show you, but it has client info, so&#8230;.no screenshot for you. You can see one posted by PPCHero.com <a href="http://www.ppchero.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sitelinks.jpg">here</a>, though.</p>
<p>Note that you can name each link free-form, and then specify the destination URL.</p>
<p>There you have it.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus tip</strong>: To see what traffic those additional links actually bring in, I will continue to beat you over the head on creating a <a href="http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=55578">Google Analytics campaign URL</a>. Forming your links this way specifies them as their own special deal when you look at your referring traffic in Analytics. Create the link there and use that as the destination URL. Google Analytics integrates seamlessly with AdWords, but I don&#8217;t get the impression they&#8217;re breaking out reporting specific to these extra links, so&#8230;.it&#8217;s up to you.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re not using Google Analytics, you need to contact me. Seriously, it&#8217;s time for an intervention.</p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/Users/Susie/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/Users/Susie/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png" alt="" /></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/ClickingChick"><img src="http://www.twitterbuttons.com/images/lbn/twitterbutton-0104.gif" title="By: TwitterButtons.com" width="142" height="48" /></a><br /><a <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/GOx_jTjwfbA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-4-because-its-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-4-because-its-new/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How The Economy Is Stopping Businesses From Being Like Ryan Seacrest</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/nF5aMtaQjzM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/how-the-economy-is-stopping-businesses-from-being-like-ryan-seacrest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that I deal with lots of small and mid-size businesses, and given that nary a day goes by where someone mentions the economy, I thought it relevant to point out in what ways the economy has changed some habits for the better.
Sure, there&#8217;s the usual &#8220;Holy shit&#8221; when it comes to the economy. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that I deal with lots of small and mid-size businesses, and given that nary a day goes by where someone mentions the economy, I thought it relevant to point out in what ways the economy has changed some habits for the better.</p>
<p>Sure, there&#8217;s the usual &#8220;Holy shit&#8221; when it comes to the economy. It just induces that kind of reaction. Houses are worth half of what they were. 401ks are worth 10% of what they were. Businesses are folding. Ryan Seacrest remains famous for&#8230;.we don&#8217;t really know what.</p>
<p>One thing it has accomplished (after scaring the ever-loving crap out of people) is that it&#8217;s forced small business to really, really take a good look at where their advertising money and marketing money is going. Sure, they looked at it before as they&#8217;d get their one month report from a vendor that was probably doing next to nothing, and they&#8217;d sign the checks to said vendor. There was plenty of money, and since business was coming in, there was a general assumption that what you were paying a vendor to do was working. You were earning, checks were signed, life was good.</p>
<p><span id="more-119"></span>Things change when there&#8217;s less money. In most cases, they started changing before the impact. Kinda like when you&#8217;re sitting at a stoplight, and you see someone FLYING up behind you in your rearview mirror, but you can&#8217;t go anywhere, because you&#8217;re surrounded by other cars on both sides.</p>
<p>You just hold your breath, wince, and brace for the smash.</p>
<p>That part is definitely over. The impact has pretty much happened. I tend to think we&#8217;re in that phase where we&#8217;re going, &#8220;Whew. OK. I&#8217;m alive. I&#8217;m breathing.&#8221; We&#8217;re peering out of our smashed up cars to see who&#8217;s still standing, some might still be wandering around in shock, but on the whole, we&#8217;re piecing things together.</p>
<p>So, what does that mean post-fiery-economic-car-wreck? Are we better drivers for it?</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Trend #1: Businesses are pickier about their service.<br />
</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I hear a lot of people bitch as a vendor or service provider because work is scarcer. Yeah, it&#8217;s tougher. Contracts take longer. Funds get frozen. People back out. Businesses go under or don&#8217;t get funding. That&#8217;s all a given. But I hear bitching about how businesses seem more involved with the output of their vendors.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Excuse me, but WHY are you bitching? I&#8217;m not talking about micromanagers &#8211; those people are hugely challenging (and sometimes impossible) to work with. I&#8217;m talking about people that are frustrated because businesses expect more in the way of understanding what they&#8217;re paying for. As I try and address on this blog a few times a week, internet marketing isn&#8217;t the easiest thing to understand, and businesses feel immense pressure to be doing something with it. They have to justify to themselves why they&#8217;re paying you.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">If you want to make that hard, go right ahead. There are thousands of others out there who will glady go above and beyond.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Personally, it&#8217;s good for me if a vendor is frustrated by that. If I couldn&#8217;t back up the service and value I give, I&#8217;d be frustrated too, trying to address that with a client. All of my dealings are crystal clear, every report is made as simple as possible, with the offer to walk through it. There&#8217;s never a doubt as to what money is going into someone&#8217;s campaign and what they&#8217;re getting out of it. If you offer any less than that, then yes, vendors are going to get nervous. They cannot afford to pay you a cent right now without feeling entirely secure in the fact they&#8217;re getting business out of it down the line. </span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Trend #2: Businesses are more aware of the value of their own customers.<br />
</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">I can&#8217;t count the number of times I&#8217;ve been talking with a client, or a potential one, about a PPC campaign for them, and the subject of  the value of a conversion for their business comes up. It&#8217;s obviously more straightforward with something like an e-commerce site since all sales can be tracked, and they&#8217;re broken out by referring channel, etc.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">But what about a service provider? A financial broker? An insurance agent? Those are more complex services, so normally their internet marketing focuses on lead generation &#8211; getting them folks that need their service.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">But&#8230;how on EARTH do you put a value on that? One might sign up for a $2000 a year car insurance policy. Another might take out eight bajillion dollars in life insurance (can you tell I don&#8217;t work in insurance?). There&#8217;s no set value on that.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">And frankly, clients never really tried to come up with one. I&#8217;d encourage them to estimate an average profit to them for each lead that comes in, using very quick and dirty math. Most of them wouldn&#8217;t. They knew they were making more in the long run than they were spending in PPC, and that was fine by them.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">No more, my friends. It&#8217;s a rare client now that doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;I need my cost per lead to be in the x-x range.&#8221; They are very, very conscious of every single dollar their customers bring in, and how much they can spend to get them.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">Know the added kick in the gut for them? They&#8217;re also dealing with Trend #1. They&#8217;re likely having to provide more service than they ever did for the same, or less, income.<br />
</span></span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Trend #3: While people are bitching about businesses getting pickier, no one is looking at the upshot: more of them are turning to online advertising.</span></h2>
<p>In some ways there&#8217;s less work, but in other ways, it&#8217;s the opposite case. Yes, many businesses have failed, but there are businesses out there who are keeping their head above water but are very aware they need to be more aggressive. They are swallowing their bad habits of the same print ads they&#8217;ve run for years, picking up the phone and saying, &#8220;Can you please tell me what SEO is, and why everyone says I need it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Because everyone tells them to? Maybe, but that&#8217;s likely a small reason. They&#8217;re doing it because of the offshoot of Trend #2: they need to know what every dollar is getting them. They can&#8217;t rely on fuzzy math. Spending a little less than they&#8217;re earning isn&#8217;t enough, because they&#8217;ve had the crap scared out of them, and they want their returns to have some padding to keep them afloat. Before, it was usually &#8220;we&#8217;re still in the green, who cares?&#8221; Now it&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8217;re in the green, but we want more of it.&#8221; Online advertising is the most trackable form of advertising you can engage in, not to mention arguably the one with the lowest barrier to entry. They can&#8217;t afford fancy designers, expensive flyers, paying salespeople out the nose&#8230;they need cold, hard numbers. I mentioned before that Ryan Seacrest is still famous. Who knows why, but businesses won&#8217;t take chances like that on their brands right now. They have to know what is actually working and WHY, so they can duplicate it.</p>
<p>And anyone who reads this blog knows that when you get down to it, online advertising is all about the numbers, testing, and using what you learn. Kind of like what we learned with the economy:</p>
<p>1. You can&#8217;t spend ruthlessly forever</p>
<p>2. Pay attention to what you do try. You&#8217;ll need it later.</p>
<p>3. Ask for reassurance that you&#8217;re getting what you think you are when you sign a check. (*cough*Madoff*cough*)</p>
<p>Above all, keep nursing the wounds and plowing ahead. Being scared should never prevent you from promoting your services, even if your budget might limit the ways in which you can.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/ClickingChick"><img src="http://www.twitterbuttons.com/images/lbn/twitterbutton-0104.gif" title="By: TwitterButtons.com" width="142" height="48" /></a><br /><a <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/nF5aMtaQjzM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/how-the-economy-is-stopping-businesses-from-being-like-ryan-seacrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/11/how-the-economy-is-stopping-businesses-from-being-like-ryan-seacrest/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I Like Email Marketing More than RSS</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/SHPQhPM_ahQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-i-like-email-marketing-more-than-rss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading a post the other day about RSS. (Extra points to Michael Gray for using &#8220;ass&#8221; in the title.) You know, the direct feeds to the content you subscribe to. That thing. That thing that was supposed to be a huge darling of the &#8220;push marketing&#8221; theories.
And really, it hasn&#8217;t been. The adoption [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/blogging/big-fat-rss-lie/">a post the other day about RSS.</a> (Extra points to Michael Gray for using &#8220;ass&#8221; in the title.) You know, the direct feeds to the content you subscribe to. That thing. That thing that was supposed to be a huge darling of the &#8220;push marketing&#8221; theories.</p>
<p>And really, it hasn&#8217;t been. The adoption rate never really got off the ground. Which I think highlights why email still serves a purpose.</p>
<p><span id="more-112"></span>I get a lot of email every day. It can be stress-inducing. I use RSS feeds because I read so many blogs and consume so much content, but you know what? I&#8217;m going to be TOTALLY UNCOOL and say that sometimes I wince to open my RSS feeds. There&#8217;s tons of bolded stuff, totally mocking my inability to be a cool social media kid that makes $1,385,483 every day on my 1000 affiliate sites so I&#8217;d have TIME to read everything people are posting.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">So why am I bitching about RSS when I am also bitching about emails?</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Here&#8217;s the thing about RSS &#8211; it&#8217;s easier to dismiss because all it&#8217;s doing is hand delivering something that already exists on a website. I know that I can go to the site whenever and catch up.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I&#8217;m not getting anything else that everyone else isn&#8217;t. Yawn. I subscribe because of a convenience and time-saving factor versus visiting every.single.site. But there&#8217;s no inherent value aside from that.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Email is like a VIP club.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">When I get an email from a writer or site I love, it&#8217;s different. Yes, I am like, &#8220;Ah crap. More to read.&#8221; So I save it &#8217;til later when I&#8217;m not immersed in work and that email feels like one more thing I have to get to.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">But I save it. Know why?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Because that message isn&#8217;t on their website. Well I mean, it might be a summary or a reiteration of something, but usually, it&#8217;s some little nugget that ISN&#8217;T.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I&#8217;m an information whore. I read constantly. I love getting information that probably isn&#8217;t available to the masses. Not because it&#8217;s a superiority thing, I just have this naturally insatiable level of curiosity.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The thing is, I think more users feel that way than would ever admit it. I used to manage a portion of email marketing for an extremely large retailer&#8230;.millions of emails were sent a week, and I learned something very interesting.</span></p>
<p>What I&#8217;d hear: &#8220;Oh you&#8217;re the one who sends all that SPAM. No one reads that stuff, including me.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I knew: Millions of people opened the emails. And clicked through. And email accounted for a quarter of this site&#8217;s web sales, which was an insanely huge number.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">In other words: no matter what people said or perceived, it worked.</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="color: #000000;">Email can be tough and frustrating to build up. Like building traffic for your blog, you have to build an audience for an email list, and that can take awhile. You have to be creative about the WHY of it. WHY would they want to join? </span></span></p>
<p>A lot of it boils down to credibility. People will say offer something for free, and I wholeheartedly endorse that, but that&#8217;s a short-term strategy if people don&#8217;t buy the long-term value you provide. You offer a white paper &#8211; awesome. They sign up, aren&#8217;t impressed, and guess how quickly they start unsubscribing? Fast.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Ongoing email use boils down to value.</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Keeping your subscribers is another challenge. Remember how I said I like emails because I get information from someone I respect that I wouldn&#8217;t get anywhere else on their blog? Yes. That means you can&#8217;t just paste your latest blog entry, or email saying &#8220;hey, read my new entry.&#8221; You have to provide value, and trust me, I know that&#8217;s daunting. It can be a struggle to continually provide value in all your other areas of marketing and then have to do it for yet another channel.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The best advice? Come up with a structure or a schedule. Decide what you want your email to cover, and the days/times of month you think you can handle sending it. Maybe you&#8217;re a car dealership and you send &#8220;Bi-monthly Buying Tips.&#8221; Just deciding that, you&#8217;ve already decided to send it twice a month, and what your subject will be.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">That&#8217;s half the battle. Now just make sure the content is good.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">And for God&#8217;s sake, give incentive to clickthrough to your site. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Mantra: The purpose of email is to ultimately drive traffic to your site.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Do not repeat the error I CONSTANTLY see clients make of neglecting that step. Yes, provide value. Don&#8217;t re-gurg what&#8217;s on your site. But remember that you ultimately want people to come back to the site you&#8217;re building, so implement that as appropriate in your outgoing messages.</span></p>
<p>Email = another valuable tool to leverage. Don&#8217;t waste it.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/SHPQhPM_ahQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-i-like-email-marketing-more-than-rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-i-like-email-marketing-more-than-rss/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Marketing Is Not Dead (Told You So)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/9fnqsqCyUq4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/email-marketing-is-not-dead-told-you-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may mouth off like PPC is all I know, but the truth is, I started in email marketing. Waaaaay back in the mid-2000s. Maybe it&#8217;s not THAT &#8220;waaaaay&#8221; back, but with the speed the internet moves, it sure feels that way. Blogs for customers by retailers were a new concept, let&#8217;s put it that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may mouth off like PPC is all I know, but the truth is, I started in email marketing. Waaaaay back in the mid-2000s. Maybe it&#8217;s not THAT &#8220;waaaaay&#8221; back, but with the speed the internet moves, it sure feels that way. Blogs for customers by retailers were a new concept, let&#8217;s put it that way.</p>
<p>So, I started in email marketing, which over the past few years, has gotten a little beat up. People wrote it off as insignificant, that everything was going the way of social media, and the archaic methods of emails and enewsletters were SO yesterday.</p>
<p>Lately, email&#8217;s been the comeback kid. It makes me feel better, because hey, what good is expertise in an area that everyone thinks is lame? Made me feel like the old woman in the corner going, &#8220;Back in MY DAY email meant something!&#8221;</p>
<p>In that vein, I&#8217;ll be adding email marketing to the roster of things covered here on CC. There will be other online advertising methods added over time as well, but given the buzz that <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=115417" target="_blank">email&#8217;s back</a>. No really. It&#8217;s not dead, and you know that&#8217;s probably true when <a href="http://www.problogger.net/blog/" target="_blank">Darren Rowse says so</a>. (And he offers stats. Numbers and graphs make my heart skip a beat.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/9fnqsqCyUq4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/email-marketing-is-not-dead-told-you-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/email-marketing-is-not-dead-told-you-so/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Tools You’re Not Using – Lesson 3</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/iGZYNs7U8Dg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ad Copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things that make keywords so valuable is that it&#8217;s like a&#8230;I don&#8217;t know, projectile laser beam of thought coming right from a user. They&#8217;re typing in that word RIGHT now. It&#8217;s not a magazine ad, with an ad that maybe might kind of, in a way, somewhat deliver a message to someone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that make keywords so valuable is that it&#8217;s like a&#8230;I don&#8217;t know, projectile laser beam of thought coming right from a user. They&#8217;re typing in that word RIGHT now. It&#8217;s not a magazine ad, with an ad that maybe might kind of, in a way, somewhat deliver a message to someone who maybe slightly gives a crap.</p>
<p>That guesswork changes. With search advertising, you know what they&#8217;re looking for and can position yourself accordingly.</p>
<p>So if you know what someone is looking for, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to use their EXACT search term in your advertising? Sounds scary, right? Sounds like I&#8217;m smoking crack-laced running socks, right?</p>
<p>Ha. I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p><span id="more-105"></span>You might be bidding on 100 keywords or 532, 394. Either way, you need to use those keywords as tools.</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t read it (and don&#8217;t tell me if you didn&#8217;t, it&#8217;ll just make me pissy), we <a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/dont-build-your-ppc-on-a-foundation-of-poo/">reviewed campaign and ad group setups</a>. I also mentioned that when you create an ad, it&#8217;s tied to the ad group level. That can get daunting. Maybe the theme of your ad group works, but dammit, there are a few different kinds of keywords and you can&#8217;t fit them in the wretched character limit on the ads.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Meet Dynamic Keyword Insertion</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">For as many tools as Google makes available (most of which I think probably overwhelm PPC do-it-yourselfers), the whole dynamic ability is kind of buried. And, let&#8217;s face it, it sounds kinda&#8230;icky. Techie. Code-ridden. Scary.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">It&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s oh-so-friggin&#8217;-cool.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">When you use dyanmic keyword insertion, you&#8217;re telling Google &#8220;You&#8217;re showing this ad because someone searched a keyword I&#8217;m bidding on. I want you to use that exact term they bid on *here* and *here* in my ad, please. Kthanks.&#8221; It literally inserts the user&#8217;s search term into your ad.</span></p>
<p>Why&#8217;s that cool? I know you didn&#8217;t just ask me that.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you sell Chevy car parts. Let&#8217;s also say you bid on &#8220;corvette door handles.&#8221;</p>
<p>You that keyword in a &#8220;door handles&#8221; ad group, which also has things like &#8220;silverado door handles&#8221; or something. The ad that runs for this ad group is&#8230;.um&#8230;let&#8217;s say it has a headline like: Chevy Door Handles.</p>
<p>It gets the job done, it&#8217;s relevant.</p>
<p>Then a searcher decides to search for &#8220;corvette door handles.&#8221; Two ads come up: one that says &#8220;Chevy Door Handles&#8221; or one from your competitor that says &#8220;Corvette Door Handles.&#8221;</p>
<p>Guess which one they&#8217;re more likely to click on?</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">My Competitor is Psychic Now? Damn Them!</span></h2>
<p>No, they&#8217;re not. They used DKI, or dynamic keyword insertion. They TOLD Google to use the searcher&#8217;s term in the headline.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how you do this:</p>
<p>Before I go any further, understand that if the searcher types in a phrase that&#8217;s too long to fit into the headline character count, Google will need a fall-back option. So if your Corvette handles searcher looked for &#8220;used chrome corvette handles,&#8221; Google goes, &#8220;Um, I&#8217;d like to put this in your headline like you asked me to, but it&#8217;s too long. Now what?&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;now what&#8221; has to come from you.</p>
<p>Ok, so go into the Ads tab and create a new one. In the headline, you&#8217;re going to want to format it like this:</p>
<p>{Keyword:Insert the &#8220;now what&#8221; fall back here}</p>
<p>So, like we mentioned above, this ad group&#8217;s theme are Chevy door handles. So it&#8217;s pretty safe to use something like that for your headline. It would read:</p>
<p>{Keyword:Chevy Door Handles}</p>
<p>In essence, you&#8217;re telling Google, &#8220;Use the search term that the user put in, but if it&#8217;s too long, use what I put in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Voila! You&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>Try it as a user. Type in a longer-tail, more specific term. You&#8217;ll likely see some ads show up with that term as the headline, and others will be more generic. They&#8217;re smartypants advertisers, and now you are, too. Lookit you, all advanced-user-y.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/iGZYNs7U8Dg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/ppc-tools-youre-not-using-lesson-3/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Understanding SEO Helps With Your PPC</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/MA-RG0bYYag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-understanding-seo-helps-with-your-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been asked a lot if I do organic search, and I certainly do. I&#8217;m not a web-head, so when it comes to coding and the really technical stuff, I have folks I lean on. But, when it comes to organic, I&#8217;m well versed at the keyphrases, how to write SEO content, link building, etc. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been asked a lot if I do organic search, and I certainly do. I&#8217;m not a web-head, so when it comes to coding and the really technical stuff, I have folks I lean on. But, when it comes to organic, I&#8217;m well versed at the keyphrases, how to write SEO content, link building, etc. The word-nerd vs. overly technie stuff.</p>
<p>And none of that really has to do with PPC, right? Wrong. Understanding at least the basics of how SEO works will help you be more prolific at certain aspects of PPC.</p>
<h2><span id="more-99"></span><span style="color: #ff6600;">SEO-to-PPC-Skill #1: URL names</span></h2>
<p>Perhaps I should call these the S-to-the-P skills. Er, skillz. Mad ones, yo.</p>
<p>One of the important ways you use your chosen keywords is to include relevant ones in the names of your site URLs. (If I&#8217;m already speaking Greek, we can cover more SEO in the future. Always feel free to suggest topics.) One of the first things a search engine looks at is the words that are in your URL &#8211; in other words, they&#8217;re of mucho importance.</p>
<p>The same logic applies to your landing pages tied to your PPC ads. When you bid on a keyword, Google looks at your ad as well as your landing page to <a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/keyword-quality-scores-why-you-ultimately-should-care-hint/">determine your ad rank</a>. Naming your PPC landing page with the relevant keyword you&#8217;re bidding on can help your ad rank/bid cost, just like the names of your URLs can help you in organic search.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">S-to-the-P Skill #2: Keyword usage</span></h2>
<p>When Google digs around to do its organic listings, it looks at the keywords that are on the pages of your site. It does this also when it checks out the PPC landing pages you create. Now, I&#8217;m not saying to barf up your keywords in eight million places on your page &#8211; this would seriously piss off Google for organic rankings, and it will make your PPC landing page seem weird. (&#8221;Why is this business repeating this word over and over? Is this some kind of freaky subconscious crap? I&#8217;m SO outta here.&#8221;)</p>
<p>What does help is relevant use of your keywords, and that&#8217;s true for organic rankings or PPC landing pages. Use your keyword when you can, but don&#8217;t force it. If you&#8217;re bidding on a word and Google sees it on the page, it&#8217;s reassuring that your bid makes sense.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">S-to-the-P Skill: #3: Keyword picking</span></h2>
<p><a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/so-what-keywords-do-i-bid-on/">Choosing PPC keywords</a> can be daunting, and personally I find picking organic ones probably a little more scary. There are millions of keywords out there, and in PPC you probably have a limited budget. In organic search, you have budget limitations, vendor issues, or  if you&#8217;re doing it yourself, you have a finite amount of time you can devote to nursing your organic rankings.</p>
<p>Either way, you have limitations that make it crucial you understand how to balance those issues with the keywords you want to go after. You have to make tough decisions when you&#8217;re first starting out, and it&#8217;s the same whether you&#8217;re going with paid or organic. (Or both, in an ideal world.) Be picky, be realistic, and understand you have to do the one-bite-at-a-time implementation. It takes time to rank organically, so focus on the keywords that work. It takes time and solid bidding and strategy to rank efficiently on Adwords. This time will be all-the-more frustrating if you don&#8217;t focus on relevant keywords, and pay attention to what actually WORKS and not what you wish-to-God would work.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to know SEO to have a great PPC campaign, but if you understand SEO you&#8217;re ahead of the game when you launch a paid campaign. Use your SEO noodle to really make your paid campaign portion sing.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/MA-RG0bYYag" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-understanding-seo-helps-with-your-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/why-understanding-seo-helps-with-your-ppc/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Build Your PPC On a Foundation of Poo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClickingChick/~3/ojFBbxnpBxg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/dont-build-your-ppc-on-a-foundation-of-poo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ClickingChick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Themes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clickingchick.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It occurred to me today that there are some basic things that you might not be using correctly in your PPC campaign. And I do mean BASIC. As in, not setting things up correctly that you have to create anyway in order to even run a campaign in the first place.
I take for granted that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurred to me today that there are some basic things that you might not be using correctly in your PPC campaign. And I do mean BASIC. As in, not setting things up correctly that you have to create anyway in order to even run a campaign in the first place.</p>
<p>I take for granted that these are things people have a knack for. Like driving. But I won&#8217;t yell at you and smite your ancestors  like I do if you suck at driving.</p>
<p>This all came to me very clearly today, as I was looking at an old PPC campaign that a company is having me overhaul for them, and was horrified.</p>
<p><span id="more-89"></span>Let me be clear. I wasn&#8217;t horrified that the setup was terrible &#8211; I don&#8217;t expect anyone to know innately how online advertising works. I was sitting there shaking my head going &#8220;Oh jeez, come ON&#8221; because it was done that way by a guy who had billed himself as a PPC person to these people.</p>
<p>So, this lesson may be too elementary, but it&#8217;s probably a good reminder that there are basic things that should be set up a certain way so you&#8217;re not causing problems for yourself and having to fix things later. (Or hire me to. Not that I&#8217;d turn it away, of course.)</p>
<p>Since we&#8217;ve all been told the beginning is a good place to start, let&#8217;s do that. If I don&#8217;t, I&#8217;ll have so much I want to cover, that it&#8217;ll drive you crazy, you&#8217;ll leave, and I&#8217;ll be heartbroken. Bad ending.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Campaigns, Ad Groups, Whatever&#8230;I just want to buy some keywords!</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">When I logged into the aforementioned account today, there was a single campaign with a single ad group and about 50 terms being bid on that weren&#8217;t really related to each other. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I  know that sounds scary.  It was. But it&#8217;s SO avoidable, if you understand why each of those things is important on its own. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Campaigns </strong>are the highest &#8220;level&#8221; of your PPC advertising. You may only need one, most companies do fine with that. What&#8217;s important to understand is what is set in your campaign level versus what is set in your ad group level.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">At a basic level, campaigns house two very important settings: geotargeting and daily budget setting. A lot of other stuff is set up here, but I&#8217;ll set those aside for another Tools You&#8217;re Not Using lesson. For a basic setup, geotargeting and budget setting is what I find to be most commonly used. They&#8217;re also what I&#8217;ve found to be the biggest deciders in having more than one campaign.</span></p>
<p>For example, if I sell creepy china dolls (they&#8217;re all creepy, I don&#8217;t care what you say) but I only sell them to Maine, Texas and Arizona, I&#8217;ll probably want to set up three different campaigns. I don&#8217;t HAVE to, necessarily. If I&#8217;m using the same keywords for all of them, then I can have one campaign that only runs in those states. But, chances are, I&#8217;ll want &#8220;creepy, soulless china dolls Texas&#8221; and I won&#8217;t want that to show up for my Maine searchers. It keeps it cleaner to have them all in separate campaigns for tracking purposes, too. When you start lumping creepy china doll keywords together, you start losing the ability to see which states would be performing better, if your cost per click is drastically different and therefore you&#8217;re better off only running in one state, etc.</p>
<p>So. When you  are faced with that &#8220;campaigns&#8221; page in AdWords, don&#8217;t sweat and obsess. Just think, &#8220;Do I need to segment my audience by location?&#8221; If so, then set up a campaign for each one. If not, you&#8217;re probably going be alright with a single one.</p>
<p>The exception to that is if you get fancy with budget. If you are considering running some things only during some days and times, and other things on a different ad schedule, you&#8217;ll want to group them into campaigns so you can control that. For instance, if you offer a service where you can&#8217;t receive phone calls after 5pm because you want to actually answer the phone, you can specify that your ads don&#8217;t show after 5. If you also sell an ebook that people can buy anytime, you&#8217;ll want that ad running 24/7. These two things would have to be two different campaigns.</p>
<p>This is a very, very basic guideline for when to break out campaigns, but it would fix a lot of the problems I stumble across out there.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">Man, You&#8217;re Anal. Dare I Ask About Ad Groups?</span></h2>
<p>So glad you did, friend.</p>
<p><strong>Ad Groups</strong> are a little more subjective, but the rule you can use to help you is: <a href="http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/3-pink-slipper-ads-and-why-some-leave-me-cold/">what ad do I want my PPC keyword searchers to see?</a></p>
<p>Would you show the same commercial for someone that&#8217;s searching for Coke as you would searching for Diet Coke? No. They have different motivators. The Coke person doesn&#8217;t care if you&#8217;re zero calories, so you shouldn&#8217;t have an ad that says so. Well, not if you want them to care, anyway.</p>
<p>Ad Groups can be harder because you can probably justify a lot of different ways of grouping your keywords in them. I usually suggest that you look at the keywords you know you want to go after, and start grouping them together based on the messages you&#8217;d use to advertise. You&#8217;ll start to see natural patterns emerge. Some ad groups might have 50 words, and others might have 5. There&#8217;s no hard and fast rule on that &#8211;  just clump them together and ask yourself as you do it, &#8220;Would I show the same ad to all of these words?&#8221;</p>
<p>So Campaign begets Ad Groups, begets your keywords the ads tied to those keywords.</p>
<p>You got it.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClickingChick/~4/ojFBbxnpBxg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/dont-build-your-ppc-on-a-foundation-of-poo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.clickingchick.com/2009/10/dont-build-your-ppc-on-a-foundation-of-poo/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
