<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Clinical Conversations</title>
	
	<link>http://podcasts.jwatch.org</link>
	<description>Audio podcasts featuring the week's news plus your comments and pertinent interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 23:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<copyright>2008-2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>jwbeta@jwatch.org (Journal Watch)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>jwbeta@jwatch.org (Journal Watch)</webMaster>
	<category>Medicine</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>Stay informed of the most relevant medical developments by subscribing to Clinical Conversations (http://podcasts.jwatch.org), from Journal Watch. This podcast features a round-up of the week's top medical stories, clinically-oriented interviews and liste</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Stay informed of the most relevant medical developments by subscribing to Clinical Conversations (http://podcasts.jwatch.org), from Journal Watch.  This podcast features a round-up of the week's top medical stories, clinically-oriented interviews and listeners’ comments…in 30 minutes or less.  Produced by the publishers of the New England Journal of Medicine,  Journal Watch (jwatch.org) delivers independent, practical, and concise information you can trust.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords />
	<itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine">
		<itunes:category text="Medicine" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Journal Watch</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>jwbeta@jwatch.org</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://podcasts.jwatch.org//wp-content/themes/jwbeta%20-%20podcast/images/iTunes_generic_300x300.jpg" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ClinicalConversations" /><feedburner:info uri="clinicalconversations" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><media:copyright>2008-2010</media:copyright><media:thumbnail url="http://podcasts.jwatch.org//wp-content/themes/jwbeta%20-%20podcast/images/iTunes_generic_300x300.jpg" /><media:keywords></media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Science &amp; Medicine/Medicine</media:category><item>
		<title>Podcast 161: Boston bombings’ lessons part two</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/akCzBY5MvQQ/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-161-boston-bombings-lessons-part-two/2013/05/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass casualties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alasdair Conn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass casualties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preparedness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alasdair Conn, chief of emergency services at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School continues our series on the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings. Thank you for listening. Do let us know what you think. Joe Elia Links: Dr. Conn&#8217;s essay in the Annals of Internal Medicine Last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Alasdair Conn, chief of emergency services at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School continues our series on the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings.</p>
<p>Thank you for listening. Do let us know what you think.</p>
<p>Joe Elia</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1682479">Dr. Conn&#8217;s essay in the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-160-marathon-bombing-lessons/2013/05/09/">Last week&#8217;s conversation with Dr. Ron Walls</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=akCzBY5MvQQ:BMxNsr3tkyY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/akCzBY5MvQQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-161-boston-bombings-lessons-part-two/2013/05/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:32</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Alasdair Conn, chief of emergency services at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School continues our series on the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings.
Thank you for listening. Do let us k[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Alasdair Conn, chief of emergency services at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School continues our series on the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings.
Thank you for listening. Do let us know what you think.
Joe Elia
Links:
Dr. Conn’s essay in the Annals of Internal Medicine
Last week’s conversation with Dr. Ron Walls
 </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Terrorism, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/EhWILsYl6cE/JWPodcast161.mp3" fileSize="7586669" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-161-boston-bombings-lessons-part-two/2013/05/14/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/EhWILsYl6cE/JWPodcast161.mp3" length="7586669" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast161.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 160: The Marathon bombing — lessons learned</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/u-00FMti6nM/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-160-marathon-bombing-lessons/2013/05/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass casualties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass casualties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your questions about the status of Clinical Conversations. We&#8217;re edging our way back toward a normal schedule with this, the first of a planned multipart series on the lessons learned in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings. Ron M. Walls, professor and chair of the department of emergency medicine at Brigham [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Thank you for your questions about the status of Clinical Conversations. We&#8217;re edging our way back toward a normal schedule with this, the first of a planned multipart series on the lessons learned in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings.</p>
<p>Ron M. Walls, professor and chair of the department of emergency medicine at Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital and Harvard Medical School is the guest. Listen in and please let us know what you think.</p>
<p>Joe Elia</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Link</span>:</p>
<p><a href="http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1684255">The JAMA &#8220;Viewpoint&#8221; piece written with Michael Zinner.</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=u-00FMti6nM:WKZEwMQOEOI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/u-00FMti6nM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-160-marathon-bombing-lessons/2013/05/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:21</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Thank you for your questions about the status of Clinical Conversations. We’re edging our way back toward a normal schedule with this, the first of a planned multipart series on the lessons learned in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bomb[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Thank you for your questions about the status of Clinical Conversations. We’re edging our way back toward a normal schedule with this, the first of a planned multipart series on the lessons learned in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings.
Ron M. Walls, professor and chair of the department of emergency medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School is the guest. Listen in and please let us know what you think.
Joe Elia
Link:
The JAMA “Viewpoint” piece written with Michael Zinner.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Terrorism, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/-fHbEADYAAM/jwpodcast160.mp3" fileSize="7452190" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-160-marathon-bombing-lessons/2013/05/09/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/-fHbEADYAAM/jwpodcast160.mp3" length="7452190" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/jwpodcast160.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 159: Making the Clinical Diagnosis, But Blowing the Patient’s Treatment Preference</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/8Ky35kcp-u8/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-159-making-the-clinical-diagnosis-but-blowing-the-patients-treatment-preference/2012/11/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiff Univeristy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Trimble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussions with patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glyn Elwyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference diagnosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Running time: 20 min. In some diseases there are two diagnoses to make: the clinical diagnosis and the diagnosis of what the patient&#8217;s treatment preference is. The first is hard enough to make, and the widening choice of treatment choices complicates the second. Welcome to the task of &#8220;preference diagnosis,&#8221; which can lead to disappointment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p><em>Running time: 20 min</em>.</p>
<p>In some diseases there are two diagnoses to make: the clinical diagnosis and the diagnosis of what the patient&#8217;s treatment preference is. The first is hard enough to make, and the widening choice of treatment choices complicates the second.</p>
<p>Welcome to the task of &#8220;preference diagnosis,&#8221; which can lead to disappointment and worse if missed in diseases like breast or prostate cancer.</p>
<p>We talk this week with the authors of an essay on the topic in <em>BMJ</em>. They offer some advice and some resources you&#8217;ll find useful.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/short/2012/1109/1"><em>First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.optiongrid.co.uk/">&#8220;Option grid&#8221; from Cardiff University</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e6572"><em>BMJ</em> essay</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=8Ky35kcp-u8:BAPeH292g9g:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/8Ky35kcp-u8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-159-making-the-clinical-diagnosis-but-blowing-the-patients-treatment-preference/2012/11/10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:20:03</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Running time: 20 min.
In some diseases there are two diagnoses to make: the clinical diagnosis and the diagnosis of what the patient’s treatment preference is. The first is hard enough to make, and the widening choice of treatment choices com[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Running time: 20 min.
In some diseases there are two diagnoses to make: the clinical diagnosis and the diagnosis of what the patient’s treatment preference is. The first is hard enough to make, and the widening choice of treatment choices complicates the second.
Welcome to the task of “preference diagnosis,” which can lead to disappointment and worse if missed in diseases like breast or prostate cancer.
We talk this week with the authors of an essay on the topic in BMJ. They offer some advice and some resources you’ll find useful.
Links:

First Watch coverage (free)
“Option grid” from Cardiff University (free)
BMJ essay (free)

 </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Diagnosis, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/OPkPrmpRVEE/JWPodcast159.mp3" fileSize="14435034" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-159-making-the-clinical-diagnosis-but-blowing-the-patients-treatment-preference/2012/11/10/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/OPkPrmpRVEE/JWPodcast159.mp3" length="14435034" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast159.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 158: Physician-assisted dying — a conversation with Dr. Marcia Angell about the Massachusetts ‘Death with Dignity’ ballot question</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/Xu1vjCxfPpQ/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-158-physician-assisted-dying/2012/10/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death with Dignity Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcia Angell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminal care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our conversation explores the question that Dr. Marcia Angell poses in a recent essay in the New York Review of Books: May doctors help you to die? Angell&#8217;s is the first name to appear as the sponsor of a November 6 ballot initiative here in Massachusetts, which is modeled on the Oregon law already in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Our conversation explores the question that Dr. Marcia Angell poses in a recent essay in the <em>New York Review of Books</em>: May doctors help you to die?</p>
<p>Angell&#8217;s is the first name to appear as the sponsor of a November 6 ballot initiative here in Massachusetts, which is modeled on the Oregon law already in place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d expect there to be some disagreement with her arguments, and you&#8217;re welcome to leave some feedback at 617-440-4374. I&#8217;d like to include them as part of the next podcast.</p>
<p>Here are some links:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/oct/11/may-doctors-help-you-die/">Angell&#8217;s essay in the <em>New York Review of Books</em></a></p>
<p>2. <a href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Massachusetts_%22Death_with_Dignity%22_Initiative,_Question_2_%282012%29">Information on the ballot initiative from Ballotpedia</a></p>
<p>3. <a href="http://www.mass.gov/ago/docs/government/2011-petitions/11-12.pdf">The full text of the &#8220;Massachusetts Death with Dignity Act&#8221;</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Xu1vjCxfPpQ:oWHo4G17-yU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/Xu1vjCxfPpQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-158-physician-assisted-dying/2012/10/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:22:39</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Our conversation explores the question that Dr. Marcia Angell poses in a recent essay in the New York Review of Books: May doctors help you to die?
Angell’s is the first name to appear as the sponsor of a November 6 ballot initiative here in [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Our conversation explores the question that Dr. Marcia Angell poses in a recent essay in the New York Review of Books: May doctors help you to die?
Angell’s is the first name to appear as the sponsor of a November 6 ballot initiative here in Massachusetts, which is modeled on the Oregon law already in place.
I’d expect there to be some disagreement with her arguments, and you’re welcome to leave some feedback at 617-440-4374. I’d like to include them as part of the next podcast.
Here are some links:
1. Angell’s essay in the New York Review of Books
2. Information on the ballot initiative from Ballotpedia
3. The full text of the “Massachusetts Death with Dignity Act”</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>death, dying, Massachusetts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/EwVcyMT1FoM/JWPodcast158.mp3" fileSize="16306447" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-158-physician-assisted-dying/2012/10/18/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/EwVcyMT1FoM/JWPodcast158.mp3" length="16306447" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast158.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 157: Of parking lots, low back pain, the Yankees, writing, and — oh yes — clinical medicine</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/KAE2wSkjix4/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-157-of-parking-lots-low-back-pain-the-yankees-writing-and-oh-yes-clinical-medicine/2012/06/26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking lots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yankees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A chat with clinician-essayist Cameron Page, whose essay &#8220;They Paved Paradise and Put Up a Parking Lot&#8221; appears in this month&#8217;s Health Affairs. Our conversation explores the connections in medicine that link outside the clinic walls, with stops along the way at William Carlos Williams, Richard Seltzer, the Yankees, and more. We get around to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A chat with clinician-essayist Cameron Page, whose essay &#8220;They Paved Paradise and Put Up a Parking Lot&#8221; appears in this month&#8217;s <em>Health Affairs</em>.</p>
<p>Our conversation explores the connections in medicine that link outside the clinic walls, with stops along the way at William Carlos Williams, Richard Seltzer, the Yankees, and more.</p>
<p>We get around to low back pain, eventually. Join us for a summer kick-off conversation</p>
<p><a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/6/1357.full.pdf+html"><em>Health Affairs</em> essay </a>(free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KAE2wSkjix4:frvAis0yaLc:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/KAE2wSkjix4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-157-of-parking-lots-low-back-pain-the-yankees-writing-and-oh-yes-clinical-medicine/2012/06/26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:14:49</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
A chat with clinician-essayist Cameron Page, whose essay “They Paved Paradise and Put Up a Parking Lot” appears in this month’s Health Affairs.
Our conversation explores the connections in medicine that link outside the clinic wal[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
A chat with clinician-essayist Cameron Page, whose essay “They Paved Paradise and Put Up a Parking Lot” appears in this month’s Health Affairs.
Our conversation explores the connections in medicine that link outside the clinic walls, with stops along the way at William Carlos Williams, Richard Seltzer, the Yankees, and more.
We get around to low back pain, eventually. Join us for a summer kick-off conversation
Health Affairs essay (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, exercise, soccer, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/DcVXZk9cIko/JWPodcast157.mp3" fileSize="10672775" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-157-of-parking-lots-low-back-pain-the-yankees-writing-and-oh-yes-clinical-medicine/2012/06/26/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/DcVXZk9cIko/JWPodcast157.mp3" length="10672775" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast157.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 156: Using low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in defined populations — a conversation with Peter Bach</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/OvzyTvw6ZgE/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-156-using-low-dose-ct-screening-for-lung-cancer-in-defined-populations-a-conversation-with-peter-bach/2012/05/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computed tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancer screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Bach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Peter Bach is the first author on a new JAMA analysis of the benefits and harms of using low-dose CT screening  for lung cancer. The American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Clinical Oncology requested the systematic review to assist them in drawing up a clinical guideline. Join us in discussing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>Dr. Peter Bach is the first author on a new <em>JAMA</em> analysis of the benefits and harms of using low-dose CT screening  for lung cancer. The American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Clinical Oncology requested the systematic review to assist them in drawing up a clinical guideline.</p>
<p>Join us in discussing who might most benefit from being offered such screening, and what work remains to be done.</p>
<p><em>Links:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1163892"><em>JAMA</em> article </a>(free)</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/424/2?q=pfw"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage of recent guidelines from the American Lung Assoc. </a>(free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=OvzyTvw6ZgE:hKQlpWBgWPc:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/OvzyTvw6ZgE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-156-using-low-dose-ct-screening-for-lung-cancer-in-defined-populations-a-conversation-with-peter-bach/2012/05/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:11:58</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Dr. Peter Bach is the first author on a new JAMA analysis of the benefits and harms of using low-dose CT screening  for lung cancer. The American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Clinical Oncology requested the systematic rev[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Dr. Peter Bach is the first author on a new JAMA analysis of the benefits and harms of using low-dose CT screening  for lung cancer. The American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Clinical Oncology requested the systematic review to assist them in drawing up a clinical guideline.
Join us in discussing who might most benefit from being offered such screening, and what work remains to be done.
Links:
JAMA article (free)
Physician’s First Watch coverage of recent guidelines from the American Lung Assoc. (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, screening, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/25vvDcGD8iI/JWPodcast156.mp3" fileSize="8617043" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-156-using-low-dose-ct-screening-for-lung-cancer-in-defined-populations-a-conversation-with-peter-bach/2012/05/20/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/25vvDcGD8iI/JWPodcast156.mp3" length="8617043" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast156.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 155: What’s wrong with U.S. healthcare and what will save it?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/mo6tVJiVTi8/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-155-whats-wrong-with-u-s-healthcare-and-what-will-save-it/2012/05/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Relman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Arnold Relman, longtime observer of the U.S. healthcare system and editor emeritus of the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes two major reforms: First, private insurance companies should leave the healthcare field, and second, physicians should organize into multispecialty practices. His proposals, just published in BMJ, grow out of his alarmed observation &#8212; some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Dr. Arnold Relman, longtime observer of the U.S. healthcare system and editor emeritus of the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, proposes two major reforms: First, private insurance companies should leave the healthcare field, and second, physicians should organize into multispecialty practices.</p>
<p>His proposals, just published in <em>BMJ</em>, grow out of his alarmed observation &#8212; some 30 years ago in the <em>NEJM</em> &#8212; of the rise of the &#8220;new medical-industrial complex.&#8221;</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e3052"><em>BMJ</em> essay</a> (free abstract)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198010233031703"><em>NEJM</em> 1980 article</a> (free abstract)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mo6tVJiVTi8:JvUhL1P9a_A:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/mo6tVJiVTi8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-155-whats-wrong-with-u-s-healthcare-and-what-will-save-it/2012/05/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:12:25</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Dr. Arnold Relman, longtime observer of the U.S. healthcare system and editor emeritus of the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes two major reforms: First, private insurance companies should leave the healthcare field, and second, physicians [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Dr. Arnold Relman, longtime observer of the U.S. healthcare system and editor emeritus of the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes two major reforms: First, private insurance companies should leave the healthcare field, and second, physicians should organize into multispecialty practices.
His proposals, just published in BMJ, grow out of his alarmed observation — some 30 years ago in the NEJM — of the rise of the “new medical-industrial complex.”
Links:
BMJ essay (free abstract)
NEJM 1980 article (free abstract)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Policy, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/xM314Hqk2nA/JWpodcast155.mp3" fileSize="8945872" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-155-whats-wrong-with-u-s-healthcare-and-what-will-save-it/2012/05/14/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/xM314Hqk2nA/JWpodcast155.mp3" length="8945872" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWpodcast155.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 154: Treating heart failure’s hypercoagulable state — warfarin or aspirin?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/GToQHNk0TlQ/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-154-treating-heart-failures-hypercoagulable-state-warfarin-or-aspirin/2012/05/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aspirin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warfarin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shunichi Homma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heart failure brings problems associated with hypercoagulation, such as stroke and sudden death. An international study followed some 2300 patients with heart failure (ejection fractions of 35% or less) and in stable sinus rhythm for a mean of 3.5 years, randomizing them to treatment with either warfarin or aspirin. The two treatment groups showed about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Heart failure brings problems associated with hypercoagulation, such as stroke and sudden death.</p>
<p>An international study followed some 2300 patients with heart failure (ejection fractions of 35% or less) and in stable sinus rhythm for a mean of 3.5 years, randomizing them to treatment with either warfarin or aspirin.</p>
<p>The two treatment groups showed about the same risks for stroke and overall mortality, but warfarin was associated with more major bleeding episodes.</p>
<p>Our guest is the first author on the report, released online by the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1202299"><em>NEJM</em> article</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GToQHNk0TlQ:uK5GZUb4aFQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/GToQHNk0TlQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-154-treating-heart-failures-hypercoagulable-state-warfarin-or-aspirin/2012/05/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:21</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Heart failure brings problems associated with hypercoagulation, such as stroke and sudden death.
An international study followed some 2300 patients with heart failure (ejection fractions of 35% or less) and in stable sinus rhythm for a mean of 3.5 [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Heart failure brings problems associated with hypercoagulation, such as stroke and sudden death.
An international study followed some 2300 patients with heart failure (ejection fractions of 35% or less) and in stable sinus rhythm for a mean of 3.5 years, randomizing them to treatment with either warfarin or aspirin.
The two treatment groups showed about the same risks for stroke and overall mortality, but warfarin was associated with more major bleeding episodes.
Our guest is the first author on the report, released online by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Links:
NEJM article</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>aspirin, Audio, Uncategorized, warfarin</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/hndFpLAZ5XA/JWPodcast154.mp3" fileSize="7456892" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-154-treating-heart-failures-hypercoagulable-state-warfarin-or-aspirin/2012/05/02/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/hndFpLAZ5XA/JWPodcast154.mp3" length="7456892" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast154.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 153: Type 2 diabetes in young people — tough going on the treatment front</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/Y386re3RYos/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-153-type-2-diabetes-in-young-people-tough-going-on-the-treatment-front/2012/04/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adolescents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes type 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adolescents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metformin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overweight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Zeitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosiglitazone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About half of adolescents with type 2 diabetes fail treatment with metformin alone within a few years. Things go somewhat better with metformin plus an intensive lifestyle intervention, and better still with the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin &#8212; however even the addition of the second drug leads to treatment failure about 40% of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>About half of adolescents with type 2 diabetes fail treatment with metformin alone within a few years. Things go somewhat better with metformin plus an intensive lifestyle intervention, and better still with the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin &#8212; however even the addition of the second drug leads to treatment failure about 40% of the time.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s to be done? On the basis of the evidence collected by the TODAY investigators, the problem has as many metabolic as social dimensions. Clearly, drugs alone are not the answer here.</p>
<p>Dr. Phil Zeitler, the TODAY study chair talks with <em>Clinical Conversations</em> about his surprise at the higher rate of failure with metformin monotherapy among adolescents than among adults, and what lessons this study holds.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/short/2012/430/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1109333"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> article</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1204710"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> editorial</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Y386re3RYos:moJ9UvmuJIo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/Y386re3RYos" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-153-type-2-diabetes-in-young-people-tough-going-on-the-treatment-front/2012/04/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:12:59</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
About half of adolescents with type 2 diabetes fail treatment with metformin alone within a few years. Things go somewhat better with metformin plus an intensive lifestyle intervention, and better still with the addition of rosiglitazone to metform[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
About half of adolescents with type 2 diabetes fail treatment with metformin alone within a few years. Things go somewhat better with metformin plus an intensive lifestyle intervention, and better still with the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin — however even the addition of the second drug leads to treatment failure about 40% of the time.
What’s to be done? On the basis of the evidence collected by the TODAY investigators, the problem has as many metabolic as social dimensions. Clearly, drugs alone are not the answer here.
Dr. Phil Zeitler, the TODAY study chair talks with Clinical Conversations about his surprise at the higher rate of failure with metformin monotherapy among adolescents than among adults, and what lessons this study holds.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch summary (free)
New England Journal of Medicine article (free)
New England Journal of Medicine editorial (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Adolescents, Audio, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Ge-RBNZcxkk/JWPodcast153.mp3" fileSize="9347426" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-153-type-2-diabetes-in-young-people-tough-going-on-the-treatment-front/2012/04/30/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Ge-RBNZcxkk/JWPodcast153.mp3" length="9347426" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast153.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 152: Gum disease and atherosclerosis — evidence for an association, but not for a cause-and-effect</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/mYd_-oMfwKY/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-152-gum-disease-and-atherosclerosis-evidence-for-an-association-but-not-for-a-cause-and-effect/2012/04/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atherosclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dentistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Periodontal disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheroclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dentistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflammation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[periodontal disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter B. Lockhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teeth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Heart Association&#8217;s scientific statement on &#8220;Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease&#8221; is likely to raise hackles among those offering treatments for gum disease as a way to lower risk for heart disease &#8212; or even to ameliorate it. The association&#8217;s writing committee, after a 4-year review of the evidence, finds no support for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The American Heart Association&#8217;s scientific statement on &#8220;Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease&#8221; is likely to raise hackles among those offering treatments for gum disease as a way to lower risk for heart disease &#8212; or even to ameliorate it. The association&#8217;s writing committee, after a 4-year review of the evidence, finds no support for such treatments and calls any assertions to the contrary &#8220;unwarranted.&#8221;</p>
<p>We interview the Dr. Peter Lockhart, co-chair of the AHA&#8217;s committee.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/2012/04/18/CIR.0b013e31825719f3">American Heart Association statement</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=mYd_-oMfwKY:48p_V0Ts52E:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/mYd_-oMfwKY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-152-gum-disease-and-atherosclerosis-evidence-for-an-association-but-not-for-a-cause-and-effect/2012/04/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:08:33</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The American Heart Association’s scientific statement on “Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease” is likely to raise hackles among those offering treatments for gum disease as a way to lower risk for heart diseas[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The American Heart Association’s scientific statement on “Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease” is likely to raise hackles among those offering treatments for gum disease as a way to lower risk for heart disease — or even to ameliorate it. The association’s writing committee, after a 4-year review of the evidence, finds no support for such treatments and calls any assertions to the contrary “unwarranted.”
We interview the Dr. Peter Lockhart, co-chair of the AHA’s committee.
Links:
American Heart Association statement (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Atherosclerosis, Audio, Dentistry, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/333zjdouY_8/JWPodcast152.mp3" fileSize="6161323" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-152-gum-disease-and-atherosclerosis-evidence-for-an-association-but-not-for-a-cause-and-effect/2012/04/18/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/333zjdouY_8/JWPodcast152.mp3" length="6161323" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast152.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 151: Most people above age 10 have at least some cross-reactive antibodies to variant influenza</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/E84-B5yQaqc/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-151-most-people-above-age-10-have-at-least-some-cross-reactive-antibodies-to-variant-influenza/2012/04/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[influenza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influenza A (H3N2)v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influenza A (H3N2)v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacqueline Katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uyeki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Influenza A (H3N2)v &#8212; a novel flu virus that emerged last summer and shows signs of being able to transmit itself from person to person &#8212; is our topic this week. The virus carries genes from swine and avian flu viruses, and the few cases found in the U.S. all made complete recovery. We talk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Influenza A (H3N2)v &#8212; a novel flu virus that emerged last summer and shows signs of being able to transmit itself from person to person &#8212; is our topic this week.</p>
<p>The virus carries genes from swine and avian flu viruses, and the few cases found in the U.S. all made complete recovery.</p>
<p>We talk with CDC epidemiologists involved in assessing the threat, and they&#8217;re reassuring on two fronts: first of all, most of the population shows at least some cross-reactive antibody to the virus; and second, they&#8217;ve isolated a candidate vaccine virus that they would use in the event that A (H3N2)v started showing increased ability for person-to-person transmission.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6114a1.htm"><em>MMWR</em> article on influenza A (H3N2)v antibodies</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6051a4.htm">CDC advice on treating influenza A (H3N2)v</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/short/2012/413/2"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E84-B5yQaqc:T6twoOSFIPk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/E84-B5yQaqc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-151-most-people-above-age-10-have-at-least-some-cross-reactive-antibodies-to-variant-influenza/2012/04/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:11:29</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Influenza A (H3N2)v — a novel flu virus that emerged last summer and shows signs of being able to transmit itself from person to person — is our topic this week.
The virus carries genes from swine and avian flu viruses, and the few case[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Influenza A (H3N2)v — a novel flu virus that emerged last summer and shows signs of being able to transmit itself from person to person — is our topic this week.
The virus carries genes from swine and avian flu viruses, and the few cases found in the U.S. all made complete recovery.
We talk with CDC epidemiologists involved in assessing the threat, and they’re reassuring on two fronts: first of all, most of the population shows at least some cross-reactive antibody to the virus; and second, they’ve isolated a candidate vaccine virus that they would use in the event that A (H3N2)v started showing increased ability for person-to-person transmission.
Links:

MMWR article on influenza A (H3N2)v antibodies (free)
CDC advice on treating influenza A (H3N2)v (free)
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>influenza, Uncategorized, Vaccination</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XwX9NfoJe6o/JWPodcast151.mp3" fileSize="8270032" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-151-most-people-above-age-10-have-at-least-some-cross-reactive-antibodies-to-variant-influenza/2012/04/14/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XwX9NfoJe6o/JWPodcast151.mp3" length="8270032" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast151.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 150: Depression (and antidepressant use) after stroke or TIA</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/iHSLhvXzOY0/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-150-depression-and-antidepressant-use-after-stroke-or-tia/2012/03/29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transient ischemic attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidepressants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nada El Husseini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After stroke or transient ischemic attack, depression is more common than among the general population, and the risk for depression extends beyond the early time period after the event. More alarmingly, less than a third of those with persistent depression &#8212; defined as depression detected both at 3 and 12 months after the cerebrovascular event [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>After stroke or transient ischemic attack, depression is more common than among the general population, and the risk for depression extends beyond the early time period after the event.</p>
<p>More alarmingly, less than a third of those with persistent depression &#8212; defined as depression detected both at 3 and 12 months after the cerebrovascular event &#8212; receive antidepressant medication.</p>
<p>We offer an interview with Dr. Nada El Husseini, first author of a study published online in <em>Stroke</em> that presents the data supporting those observations.</p>
<p>Link:</p>
<p><a href="http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2012/03/29/STROKEAHA.111.643130.abstract"><em>Stroke </em>abstract</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/short/2012/330/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=iHSLhvXzOY0:txS1Z9u6KOo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/iHSLhvXzOY0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-150-depression-and-antidepressant-use-after-stroke-or-tia/2012/03/29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:09:24</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
After stroke or transient ischemic attack, depression is more common than among the general population, and the risk for depression extends beyond the early time period after the event.
More alarmingly, less than a third of those with persistent de[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
After stroke or transient ischemic attack, depression is more common than among the general population, and the risk for depression extends beyond the early time period after the event.
More alarmingly, less than a third of those with persistent depression — defined as depression detected both at 3 and 12 months after the cerebrovascular event — receive antidepressant medication.
We offer an interview with Dr. Nada El Husseini, first author of a study published online in Stroke that presents the data supporting those observations.
Link:
Stroke abstract (free)
Physician’s First Watch summary (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, depression, screening, stroke, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/AleGCaAHlG4/JWPodcast150.mp3" fileSize="6772275" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-150-depression-and-antidepressant-use-after-stroke-or-tia/2012/03/29/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/AleGCaAHlG4/JWPodcast150.mp3" length="6772275" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast150.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 149: High levels of white rice consumption seem linked to higher risks for type 2 diabetes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/afSPjqzP8JA/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-149-high-levels-of-white-rice-consumption-seem-linked-to-higher-risks-for-type-2-diabetes/2012/03/15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes type 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qi Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A BMJ meta-analysis suggests that people with the highest levels of white rice consumption are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes. The authors examined four studies, together comprising some 350,000 subjects. Two were done in Asian populations and two among Westerners. They found a much higher intake of white rice among Asians, and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A<em> BMJ</em> meta-analysis suggests that people with the highest levels of white rice consumption are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>The authors examined four studies, together comprising some 350,000 subjects. Two were done in Asian populations and two among Westerners. They found a much higher intake of white rice among Asians, and a strong association between consumption level and risk. In Western populations, the association was suggestive, but not as strong.</p>
<p>The effect may possibly derive from the higher glycemic load with increasing consumption, or from the nutrients stripped away with the rice husk during milling.</p>
<p>The senior author, Dr. Qi Sun, discusses his findings with us in a brief interview.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.e1454"><em>BMJ</em> article</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=afSPjqzP8JA:mFrNjNZ2gM4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/afSPjqzP8JA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-149-high-levels-of-white-rice-consumption-seem-linked-to-higher-risks-for-type-2-diabetes/2012/03/15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:25</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
A BMJ meta-analysis suggests that people with the highest levels of white rice consumption are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes.
The authors examined four studies, together comprising some 350,000 subjects. Two were done in Asian populations a[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
A BMJ meta-analysis suggests that people with the highest levels of white rice consumption are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes.
The authors examined four studies, together comprising some 350,000 subjects. Two were done in Asian populations and two among Westerners. They found a much higher intake of white rice among Asians, and a strong association between consumption level and risk. In Western populations, the association was suggestive, but not as strong.
The effect may possibly derive from the higher glycemic load with increasing consumption, or from the nutrients stripped away with the rice husk during milling.
The senior author, Dr. Qi Sun, discusses his findings with us in a brief interview.
Links:
BMJ article (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, diet, Nutrition, Rice, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/JvPbjvx9ksM/JWPodcast149.mp3" fileSize="7502659" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-149-high-levels-of-white-rice-consumption-seem-linked-to-higher-risks-for-type-2-diabetes/2012/03/15/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/JvPbjvx9ksM/JWPodcast149.mp3" length="7502659" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast149.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 148: Smoking cessation during pregnancy is probably more effective with behavioral approaches than with relying on nicotine replacement</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/JxE8ljo8aFs/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-148-smoking-cessation-during-pregnancy-is-probably-more-effective-with-behavioral-approaches-than-with-relying-on-nicotine-replacement/2012/02/29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicotine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking cessation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicotine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Coleman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the largest study of its kind, UK researchers find that helping pregnant women to quit smoking until at least delivery isn&#8217;t helped much by nicotine replacement therapy. The primary outcome, self-reported cessation lasting between the start of therapy and delivery, differed little between the active treatment group and those randomized to placebo (9% versus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>In the largest study of its kind, UK researchers find that helping pregnant women to quit smoking until at least delivery isn&#8217;t helped much by nicotine replacement therapy.</p>
<p>The primary outcome, self-reported cessation lasting between the start of therapy and delivery, differed little between the active treatment group and those randomized to placebo (9% versus 8%).</p>
<p>In addition, compliance was low in both groups.</p>
<p>Links</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1109582"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> abstract</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=JxE8ljo8aFs:66uoi5XUe0Q:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/JxE8ljo8aFs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-148-smoking-cessation-during-pregnancy-is-probably-more-effective-with-behavioral-approaches-than-with-relying-on-nicotine-replacement/2012/02/29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:15</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
In the largest study of its kind, UK researchers find that helping pregnant women to quit smoking until at least delivery isn’t helped much by nicotine replacement therapy.
The primary outcome, self-reported cessation lasting between the star[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
In the largest study of its kind, UK researchers find that helping pregnant women to quit smoking until at least delivery isn’t helped much by nicotine replacement therapy.
The primary outcome, self-reported cessation lasting between the start of therapy and delivery, differed little between the active treatment group and those randomized to placebo (9% versus 8%).
In addition, compliance was low in both groups.
Links
New England Journal of Medicine abstract (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Nicotine, pregnancy, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/K6zvAefeqLM/JWPodcast148.mp3" fileSize="7380092" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-148-smoking-cessation-during-pregnancy-is-probably-more-effective-with-behavioral-approaches-than-with-relying-on-nicotine-replacement/2012/02/29/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/K6zvAefeqLM/JWPodcast148.mp3" length="7380092" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast148.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 147: Proof that colonoscopy with polypectomy saves lives</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/PH_tEIMumw4/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-147-proof-that-colonoscopy-with-polypectomy-saves-lives/2012/02/24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorectal cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adenomatous polyps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Zauber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polypectomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone &#8220;knows&#8221; that colonoscopy reduces risks of death from colorectal cancer, but it&#8217;s good to have your knowledge actually verified, and a new bit of research seems to do that in this case. Long-term follow-up of a group of patients who underwent colonoscopy and polypectomy in the 1980s shows that removal of adenomatous polyps brought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>Everyone &#8220;knows&#8221; that colonoscopy reduces risks of death from colorectal cancer, but it&#8217;s good to have your knowledge actually verified, and a new bit of research seems to do that in this case.</p>
<p>Long-term follow-up of a group of patients who underwent colonoscopy and polypectomy in the 1980s shows that removal of adenomatous polyps brought with it a risk of dying from colorectal that was half the risk found in the general population. About 80% of these patients, it should be mentioned, underwent strict surveillance for 10 years after their adenomatous polyps were excised.</p>
<p>This is good news, no? And it offers clinicians a &#8220;teaching moment&#8221; with their patients who are reluctant to undergo the procedure.</p>
<p>Listen in as we interview Dr. Ann Zauber, first author on the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> paper.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/223/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage of the research</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370"><em>New England Journal of Medicine </em>abstract</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1114639"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> editorial</a> (subscription required)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=PH_tEIMumw4:VJV_h9FrTLM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/PH_tEIMumw4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-147-proof-that-colonoscopy-with-polypectomy-saves-lives/2012/02/24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:11:33</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Everyone “knows” that colonoscopy reduces risks of death from colorectal cancer, but it’s good to have your knowledge actually verified, and a new bit of research seems to do that in this case.
Long-term follow-up of a group of pa[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Everyone “knows” that colonoscopy reduces risks of death from colorectal cancer, but it’s good to have your knowledge actually verified, and a new bit of research seems to do that in this case.
Long-term follow-up of a group of patients who underwent colonoscopy and polypectomy in the 1980s shows that removal of adenomatous polyps brought with it a risk of dying from colorectal that was half the risk found in the general population. About 80% of these patients, it should be mentioned, underwent strict surveillance for 10 years after their adenomatous polyps were excised.
This is good news, no? And it offers clinicians a “teaching moment” with their patients who are reluctant to undergo the procedure.
Listen in as we interview Dr. Ann Zauber, first author on the New England Journal of Medicine paper.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage of the research (free)
New England Journal of Medicine abstract (free)
New England Journal of Medicine editorial (subscription required)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Aging, Audio, Colonoscopy, screening, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/bjUcrarqu0g/JWPodcast147.mp3" fileSize="8320187" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-147-proof-that-colonoscopy-with-polypectomy-saves-lives/2012/02/24/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/bjUcrarqu0g/JWPodcast147.mp3" length="8320187" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast147.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 146: Cognitive impairment in primary care — screen or not?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/GbaQCnlI9F0/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-146-cognitive-impairment-in-primary-care-screen-or-not/2012/02/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive impairment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive impairment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dementia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Riley McCarten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini-Cog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current guidelines find no compelling therapeutic benefit to screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in primary care. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society has published some research that, if not compelling, certainly suggests that clinical approaches should change. In actively screening some 8000 veterans over age 70 during routine primary care visits for cognitive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Current guidelines find no compelling therapeutic benefit to screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in primary care. The <em>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</em> has published some research that, if not compelling, certainly suggests that clinical approaches should change.</p>
<p>In actively screening some 8000 veterans over age 70 during routine primary care visits for cognitive impairment, researchers found a quarter to have signs suggesting further investigation was needed. When all was said and done, 11% had cognitive impairment; that&#8217;s two to three times the rate found in settings where physicians waited for impairment to manifest itself clinically.</p>
<p>We interview the lead author, who offers reasons why he thinks simple screening should be routine in elderly populations, despite the current absence of treatments for mild cognitive impairment and dementia.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/214/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03249.x/abstract"><em>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</em> abstract</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/3rduspstf/dementia/dementrr.htm">USPSTF current screening guidelines </a>(free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bami.us/Neuro/MiniCog.html">Mini-Cog screening test </a>(free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=GbaQCnlI9F0:MQMdgfqTcr0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/GbaQCnlI9F0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-146-cognitive-impairment-in-primary-care-screen-or-not/2012/02/17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:12:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Current guidelines find no compelling therapeutic benefit to screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in primary care. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society has published some research that, if not compelling, certainly suggests tha[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Current guidelines find no compelling therapeutic benefit to screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in primary care. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society has published some research that, if not compelling, certainly suggests that clinical approaches should change.
In actively screening some 8000 veterans over age 70 during routine primary care visits for cognitive impairment, researchers found a quarter to have signs suggesting further investigation was needed. When all was said and done, 11% had cognitive impairment; that’s two to three times the rate found in settings where physicians waited for impairment to manifest itself clinically.
We interview the lead author, who offers reasons why he thinks simple screening should be routine in elderly populations, despite the current absence of treatments for mild cognitive impairment and dementia.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society abstract (free)
USPSTF current screening guidelines (free)
Mini-Cog screening test (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, screening, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XQCcQKF0doM/JWPodcast146.mp3" fileSize="8954963" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-146-cognitive-impairment-in-primary-care-screen-or-not/2012/02/17/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XQCcQKF0doM/JWPodcast146.mp3" length="8954963" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast146.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 145: The Y chromosome and the possible role of a common variant in coronary disease in men.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/bM17DcTZvlQ/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-145-the-y-chromosome/2012/02/13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haplogroups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y chromosome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haplogroups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Bloomer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrophages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA transcripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haplogroups &#8212; who knew? Ancient variations in the Y chromosome form what&#8217;s known as haplogroups, and haplogroup I is common in Europe, particularly so in northern Europe. Researchers find that &#8220;I&#8221; is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in men, carried as it is on the male-only Y chromosome. Listen in as we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Haplogroups &#8212; who knew? Ancient variations in the Y chromosome form what&#8217;s known as haplogroups, and haplogroup I is common in Europe, particularly so in northern Europe. Researchers find that &#8220;I&#8221; is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in men, carried as it is on the male-only Y chromosome.</p>
<p>Listen in as we talk ancient genetics and what it all could mean for a range of immune-system-related diseases. There&#8217;s plenty of work to be done, but we thought you ought to know about this earlier rather than later.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/209/3"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)61453-0/fulltext"><em>Lancet</em> abstract</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=bM17DcTZvlQ:FPUD5VCnOCg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/bM17DcTZvlQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-145-the-y-chromosome/2012/02/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:13:32</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Haplogroups — who knew? Ancient variations in the Y chromosome form what’s known as haplogroups, and haplogroup I is common in Europe, particularly so in northern Europe. Researchers find that “I” is an independent risk fact[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Haplogroups — who knew? Ancient variations in the Y chromosome form what’s known as haplogroups, and haplogroup I is common in Europe, particularly so in northern Europe. Researchers find that “I” is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in men, carried as it is on the male-only Y chromosome.
Listen in as we talk ancient genetics and what it all could mean for a range of immune-system-related diseases. There’s plenty of work to be done, but we thought you ought to know about this earlier rather than later.
Links:

Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
Lancet abstract (free)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Haplogroups, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/P6srho75rCk/JWPodcast145.mp3" fileSize="9738323" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-145-the-y-chromosome/2012/02/13/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/P6srho75rCk/JWPodcast145.mp3" length="9738323" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast145.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 144: Hip fractures, PPIs, and smoking history in postmenopausal women — increased risks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/E4VQo_L6Fjw/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-144-hip-fractures-ppis-and-smoking-history-in-postmenopausal-women-increased-risks/2012/02/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hip Fracture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proton pump inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Chang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calcium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamed Khalili]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip fracture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PPIs are back on our radar, and this time it&#8217;s their regular use among postmenopausal women. A BMJ article examines data from the Nurses&#8217; Health Study to show a significantly increased risk for hip fracture among postmenopausal women with any smoking history. Never-smokers showed no statistically significant increase. Now that proton pump inhibitors have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>PPIs are back on our radar, and this time it&#8217;s their regular use among postmenopausal women.</p>
<p>A BMJ article examines data from the Nurses&#8217; Health Study to show a significantly increased risk for hip fracture among postmenopausal women with <span style="text-decoration: underline;">any</span> smoking history. Never-smokers showed no statistically significant increase.</p>
<p>Now that proton pump inhibitors have been available over-the-counter for the better part of a decade, should clinicians be asking about their patients&#8217; smoking history in concert with asking about how they handle heartburn?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Links:</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.e372"><em>BMJ</em> article</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/201/2"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2010/526/3">FDA&#8217;s May 2010 warning on PPIs and fracture risks</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=E4VQo_L6Fjw:rWKcluskm9E:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/E4VQo_L6Fjw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-144-hip-fractures-ppis-and-smoking-history-in-postmenopausal-women-increased-risks/2012/02/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:17:58</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
PPIs are back on our radar, and this time it’s their regular use among postmenopausal women.
A BMJ article examines data from the Nurses’ Health Study to show a significantly increased risk for hip fracture among postmenopausal women wi[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
PPIs are back on our radar, and this time it’s their regular use among postmenopausal women.
A BMJ article examines data from the Nurses’ Health Study to show a significantly increased risk for hip fracture among postmenopausal women with any smoking history. Never-smokers showed no statistically significant increase.
Now that proton pump inhibitors have been available over-the-counter for the better part of a decade, should clinicians be asking about their patients’ smoking history in concert with asking about how they handle heartburn?
Links:
BMJ article (free)
Physician’s First Watch summary (free)
FDA’s May 2010 warning on PPIs and fracture risks (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, smoking, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Am7zXvxne3Q/JWPodcast144.mp3" fileSize="12939158" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-144-hip-fractures-ppis-and-smoking-history-in-postmenopausal-women-increased-risks/2012/02/03/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Am7zXvxne3Q/JWPodcast144.mp3" length="12939158" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast144.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 143: PPIs and asthma control — it doesn’t work in kids, either</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/CQzEyeZdkfc/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-143-ppis-and-asthma-control-it-doesnt-work-in-kids-either/2012/01/27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asthma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proton pump inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastroesophageal reflux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Holbrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lansoprazole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevacid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Wise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controlling asthma by the use of proton pump inhibitors apparently doesn&#8217;t work any better in children than it does in adults. Yet the practice is widely used. A study in JAMA and an accompanying fiery editorial seem to put the notion to rest. Listen in. As always, suggestions are welcomed. You can reach me directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Controlling asthma by the use of proton pump inhibitors apparently doesn&#8217;t work any better in children than it does in adults. Yet the practice is widely used.</p>
<p>A study in JAMA and an accompanying fiery editorial seem to put the notion to rest. Listen in.</p>
<p>As always, suggestions are welcomed. You can reach me directly at 617-440-4374 &#8212; don&#8217;t be shy!</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/125/1"><em>JAMA</em> study coverage in <em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em></a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-38-a-conversation-about-using-ppis-in-poorly-controlled-asthma-rather-not-using-them-with-robert-a-wise-of-johns-hopkins/2009/04/11/">Earlier (2009) Clinical Conversations podcast #38 with Dr. Robert Wise on the effect of PPIs in adult asthma</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=CQzEyeZdkfc:pguW0XFyDO0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/CQzEyeZdkfc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-143-ppis-and-asthma-control-it-doesnt-work-in-kids-either/2012/01/27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:14:02</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Controlling asthma by the use of proton pump inhibitors apparently doesn’t work any better in children than it does in adults. Yet the practice is widely used.
A study in JAMA and an accompanying fiery editorial seem to put the notion to rest[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Controlling asthma by the use of proton pump inhibitors apparently doesn’t work any better in children than it does in adults. Yet the practice is widely used.
A study in JAMA and an accompanying fiery editorial seem to put the notion to rest. Listen in.
As always, suggestions are welcomed. You can reach me directly at 617-440-4374 — don’t be shy!
Links:

JAMA study coverage in Physician’s First Watch (free)
Earlier (2009) Clinical Conversations podcast #38 with Dr. Robert Wise on the effect of PPIs in adult asthma (free)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>asthma, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/VEvnpdj5FoU/jwpodcast143.mp3" fileSize="10108530" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-143-ppis-and-asthma-control-it-doesnt-work-in-kids-either/2012/01/27/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/VEvnpdj5FoU/jwpodcast143.mp3" length="10108530" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/jwpodcast143.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 142: Really, why are you ordering that test?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/Ph0j37Ub8yU/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-142-really-why-are-you-ordering-that-test/2012/01/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American College of Physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amir Qaseem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasteful spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American College of Physicians wants to encourage high-value, cost-conscious care. And so they convened a consensus panel of physicians to list tests that they considered overused or inappropriately used in certain circumstances. One example would be the use of MRI for breast screening in normal-risk patients; another is the use of imaging studies in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The American College of Physicians wants to encourage high-value, cost-conscious care. And so they convened a consensus panel of physicians to list tests that they considered overused or inappropriately used in certain circumstances. One example would be the use of MRI for breast screening in normal-risk patients; another is the use of imaging studies in the diagnosis of nonspecific low-back pain.</p>
<p>The panel came up with about 40 such examples, and the ACP is inviting your reactions (and suggestions for further examples) on a survey available on its website, a link to which is in the list below.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, listen in on a 15-minute conversation with Dr. Amir Qaseem, the first author of the panel&#8217;s report, just published in the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em>. An editorial on the report cites a Congressional Budget Office study estimating that 5% of the nation&#8217;s GDP is misspent on medical tests and procedures that don&#8217;t help the patient. That&#8217;s fully 25% of all health expenditures! Houston, we have a problem&#8230;.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/117/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.annals.org/content/156/2/147.abstract"><em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em> article</a> (free abstract)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.surveymk.com/s/5JGXMNX">ACP survey form</a> (free access)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ph0j37Ub8yU:8dy7X4imYOA:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/Ph0j37Ub8yU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-142-really-why-are-you-ordering-that-test/2012/01/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:15:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The American College of Physicians wants to encourage high-value, cost-conscious care. And so they convened a consensus panel of physicians to list tests that they considered overused or inappropriately used in certain circumstances. One example wo[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The American College of Physicians wants to encourage high-value, cost-conscious care. And so they convened a consensus panel of physicians to list tests that they considered overused or inappropriately used in certain circumstances. One example would be the use of MRI for breast screening in normal-risk patients; another is the use of imaging studies in the diagnosis of nonspecific low-back pain.
The panel came up with about 40 such examples, and the ACP is inviting your reactions (and suggestions for further examples) on a survey available on its website, a link to which is in the list below.
Meanwhile, listen in on a 15-minute conversation with Dr. Amir Qaseem, the first author of the panel’s report, just published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. An editorial on the report cites a Congressional Budget Office study estimating that 5% of the nation’s GDP is misspent on medical tests and procedures that don’t help the patient. That’s fully 25% of all health expenditures! Houston, we have a problem….
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
Annals of Internal Medicine article (free abstract)
ACP survey form (free access)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Diagnosis, Testing</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/aX2aM0hhYAM/JWPodcast142.mp3" fileSize="10809134" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-142-really-why-are-you-ordering-that-test/2012/01/20/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/aX2aM0hhYAM/JWPodcast142.mp3" length="10809134" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast142.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 141: Clinically apparent atrial fibrillation increases stroke risk; does subclinical afib do the same?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/BwJMgvrT42Y/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-141-clinically-apparent-atrial-fibrillation-increases-stroke-risk-does-subclinical-afib-do-the-same/2012/01/13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anticoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atrial fibrillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atrial fibrillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart J. Connolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subclinical atrial fibrillation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it apparently does. An international study in the New England Journal of Medicine monitored subclinical atrial fibrillation among some 2600 patients who&#8217;d just received an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator. After 3 months of monitoring, about 10% of the group showed subclinical episodes of afib lasting at least 6 minutes. Over an additional 2.5 years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>Yes, it apparently does.</p>
<p>An international study in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> monitored subclinical atrial fibrillation among some 2600 patients who&#8217;d just received an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator.</p>
<p>After 3 months of monitoring, about 10% of the group showed subclinical episodes of afib lasting at least 6 minutes.</p>
<p>Over an additional 2.5 years of follow-up the patients initially showing subclinical afib were found to have at least twice the risk for stroke or systemic thromboembolism compared with the rest of the group.</p>
<p>What does it all mean to clinicians? Should anticoagulation measures be taken in patients showing subclinical afib?</p>
<p>Dr. Stuart J. Connolly, one of the study&#8217;s principal authors, chatted with <em>Clinical Conversations</em>, offering some clinical guidance on what to do while the apparent magnitude of the effect is investigated further.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/112/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1105575"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> abstract</a> (free)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=BwJMgvrT42Y:NSkjTr5a41Q:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/BwJMgvrT42Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-141-clinically-apparent-atrial-fibrillation-increases-stroke-risk-does-subclinical-afib-do-the-same/2012/01/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:12:12</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Yes, it apparently does.
An international study in the New England Journal of Medicine monitored subclinical atrial fibrillation among some 2600 patients who’d just received an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator.
After 3 months[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Yes, it apparently does.
An international study in the New England Journal of Medicine monitored subclinical atrial fibrillation among some 2600 patients who’d just received an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator.
After 3 months of monitoring, about 10% of the group showed subclinical episodes of afib lasting at least 6 minutes.
Over an additional 2.5 years of follow-up the patients initially showing subclinical afib were found to have at least twice the risk for stroke or systemic thromboembolism compared with the rest of the group.
What does it all mean to clinicians? Should anticoagulation measures be taken in patients showing subclinical afib?
Dr. Stuart J. Connolly, one of the study’s principal authors, chatted with Clinical Conversations, offering some clinical guidance on what to do while the apparent magnitude of the effect is investigated further.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
New England Journal of Medicine abstract (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Anticoagulation, Audio, stroke, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Cx7GLrMppv8/JWPodcast141.mp3" fileSize="8785689" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-141-clinically-apparent-atrial-fibrillation-increases-stroke-risk-does-subclinical-afib-do-the-same/2012/01/13/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Cx7GLrMppv8/JWPodcast141.mp3" length="8785689" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast141.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 140: A new edition of the ACP’s manual on ethics for clinicians is available online</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/fj9qR1Z987Q/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-140-a-new-edition-of-the-acps-manual-on-ethics-for-clinicians-is-available-online/2012/01/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American College of Physicians Ethics Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American College of Physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lois Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Hood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new edition of the American College of Physicians Ethics Manual has just been released, and at 30 pages, it&#8217;s well worth the reading time. It&#8217;s available free online as a supplement to the Annals of Internal Medicine. New or updated topics include social media and online professionalism, interrogation of prisoners, and allocation of medical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The new edition of the American College of Physicians <em>Ethics Manual</em> has just been released, and at 30 pages, it&#8217;s well worth the reading time.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s available free online as a supplement to the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em>. New or updated topics include social media and online professionalism, interrogation of prisoners, and allocation of medical resources.</p>
<p>In discussing the relation of the physician to the government, the manual states unequivocally: &#8220;Under no circumstances is it ethical for a physician to be used as an instrument of government to weaken the physical or mental resistance of a human being&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Listen in to our chat with two of the people on the committee that put the new edition of the manual together</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">﻿Links:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2012/103/4"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.acponline.org/running_practice/ethics/manual/">American College of Physicians Center for Ethics and Professionalism web site</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.annals.org/content/156/1_Part_2/73.full.pdf+html">Supplement to the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em></a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.annals.org/content/156/1_Part_1/56.full.pdf+html"><em>Annals</em> editorial</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=fj9qR1Z987Q:HW5aTf2fgaw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/fj9qR1Z987Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-140-a-new-edition-of-the-acps-manual-on-ethics-for-clinicians-is-available-online/2012/01/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:18:05</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The new edition of the American College of Physicians Ethics Manual has just been released, and at 30 pages, it’s well worth the reading time.
It’s available free online as a supplement to the Annals of Internal Medicine. New or updated[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The new edition of the American College of Physicians Ethics Manual has just been released, and at 30 pages, it’s well worth the reading time.
It’s available free online as a supplement to the Annals of Internal Medicine. New or updated topics include social media and online professionalism, interrogation of prisoners, and allocation of medical resources.
In discussing the relation of the physician to the government, the manual states unequivocally: “Under no circumstances is it ethical for a physician to be used as an instrument of government to weaken the physical or mental resistance of a human being….”
Listen in to our chat with two of the people on the committee that put the new edition of the manual together
﻿Links:

Physician’s First Watch coverage
American College of Physicians Center for Ethics and Professionalism web site (free)
Supplement to the Annals of Internal Medicine (free)
Annals editorial (free)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/GfcNSMfDaqs/JWPodcast140.mp3" fileSize="13018153" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-140-a-new-edition-of-the-acps-manual-on-ethics-for-clinicians-is-available-online/2012/01/06/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/GfcNSMfDaqs/JWPodcast140.mp3" length="13018153" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast140.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 139: CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea seems to improve some measures of the metabolic syndrome</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/Ka_qcWyFETk/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-139-cpap-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea-seems-to-improve-some-measures-of-the-metabolic-syndrome/2011/12/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolic syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstructive sleep apnea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous positive airway pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepak Damodaran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolic syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surendra K. Sharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A double-blind crossover study in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea ameliorates some components of the metabolic syndrome, which is present in about three quarters of such patients. The authors acknowledge the difficulty of motivating patients [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A double-blind crossover study in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> shows that 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea ameliorates some components of the metabolic syndrome, which is present in about three quarters of such patients.</p>
<p>The authors acknowledge the difficulty of motivating patients to use CPAP consistenly, which could limit its use in routine practice, and they stress the need for counseling to accompany any CPAP prescription.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1215/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch </em>coverage (free)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1103944"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> article (free)</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=Ka_qcWyFETk:ZgMWF0rW9II:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/Ka_qcWyFETk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-139-cpap-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea-seems-to-improve-some-measures-of-the-metabolic-syndrome/2011/12/17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:15:14</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
A double-blind crossover study in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea ameliorates some components of the metabolic syndrom[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
A double-blind crossover study in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea ameliorates some components of the metabolic syndrome, which is present in about three quarters of such patients.
The authors acknowledge the difficulty of motivating patients to use CPAP consistenly, which could limit its use in routine practice, and they stress the need for counseling to accompany any CPAP prescription.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
New England Journal of Medicine article (free)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, CPAP, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/xbF_Fs5kQ3M/JWPodcast139.mp3" fileSize="10963361" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-139-cpap-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea-seems-to-improve-some-measures-of-the-metabolic-syndrome/2011/12/17/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/xbF_Fs5kQ3M/JWPodcast139.mp3" length="10963361" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast139.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 138: Why do kids in the U.S. get so many inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/YPxoNKNnVGc/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-138-why-do-kids-in-the-u-s-get-so-many-inappropriate-broad-spectrum-antibiotics/2011/12/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ambulatory care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug prescribing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Hersh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambulatory care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad-spectrum antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug prescribing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pediatrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When kids go for ambulatory care, they get an antibiotic prescribed about 20% of the time. Half of those antibiotics are of the broad-spectrum variety. What are the factors leading up to this, and what are some resources to turn to for better information on this dangerous situation? Listen in to  this 27-minute podcast with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>When kids go for ambulatory care, they get an antibiotic prescribed about 20% of the time. Half of those antibiotics are of the broad-spectrum variety.</p>
<p>What are the factors leading up to this, and what are some resources to turn to for better information on this dangerous situation?</p>
<p>Listen in to  this 27-minute podcast with the first author of a <em>Pediatrics</em> study examining the issue.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1205/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage of the <em>Pediatrics</em> paper</a> (free)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/specific-groups/healthcare-providers.html">Get Smart: Know When Antibiotics Work</a> (free CDC site mentioned by Dr. Hersh)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/">Get Smart for Healthcare</a> (free CDC site)</p>
<p><em>Rising Plague</em> by Brad Spellberg (book mentioned by Hersh)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.asm.org/index.php/what-s-new-in-public-policy/gain7-1-11.html">ASM statement on the GAIN Act</a> (legislation mentioned by Hersh)</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=YPxoNKNnVGc:P1VAevjxW_4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/YPxoNKNnVGc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-138-why-do-kids-in-the-u-s-get-so-many-inappropriate-broad-spectrum-antibiotics/2011/12/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:27:21</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
When kids go for ambulatory care, they get an antibiotic prescribed about 20% of the time. Half of those antibiotics are of the broad-spectrum variety.
What are the factors leading up to this, and what are some resources to turn to for better infor[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
When kids go for ambulatory care, they get an antibiotic prescribed about 20% of the time. Half of those antibiotics are of the broad-spectrum variety.
What are the factors leading up to this, and what are some resources to turn to for better information on this dangerous situation?
Listen in to  this 27-minute podcast with the first author of a Pediatrics study examining the issue.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage of the Pediatrics paper (free)
Get Smart: Know When Antibiotics Work (free CDC site mentioned by Dr. Hersh)
Get Smart for Healthcare (free CDC site)
Rising Plague by Brad Spellberg (book mentioned by Hersh)
ASM statement on the GAIN Act (legislation mentioned by Hersh)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Pediatrics, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Ygpe_4V8ge0/JWPodcast138.mp3" fileSize="19718765" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-138-why-do-kids-in-the-u-s-get-so-many-inappropriate-broad-spectrum-antibiotics/2011/12/09/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/Ygpe_4V8ge0/JWPodcast138.mp3" length="19718765" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast138.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 137: Clamping the umbilical cord — what’s the big rush?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/-e2VcZ-MO6Q/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-137-clamping-the-umbilical-cord/2011/11/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferritin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umbilical cord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferritin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnus Domellof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midwifery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ola Andersson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umbilical cord]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study from Sweden shows that immediate clamping of the cord at birth isn&#8217;t such a great idea from the standpoint of the baby&#8217;s iron stores. BMJ&#8216;s editorialist thinks it may be time to change practice in this area. Listen in &#8212; this will be on the test! Physician&#8217;s First Watch coverage BMJ article BMJ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A study from Sweden shows that immediate clamping of the cord at birth isn&#8217;t such a great idea from the standpoint of the baby&#8217;s iron stores.</p>
<p><em>BMJ</em>&#8216;s editorialist thinks it may be time to change practice in this area.</p>
<p>Listen in &#8212; this <span style="text-decoration: underline;">will</span> be on the test!</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1116/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7157"><em>BMJ</em> article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7127"><em>BMJ</em> editorial</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=-e2VcZ-MO6Q:OGX8hku6f48:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/-e2VcZ-MO6Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-137-clamping-the-umbilical-cord/2011/11/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:17:40</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
A study from Sweden shows that immediate clamping of the cord at birth isn’t such a great idea from the standpoint of the baby’s iron stores.
BMJ‘s editorialist thinks it may be time to change practice in this area.
Listen in [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
A study from Sweden shows that immediate clamping of the cord at birth isn’t such a great idea from the standpoint of the baby’s iron stores.
BMJ‘s editorialist thinks it may be time to change practice in this area.
Listen in — this will be on the test!
Physician’s First Watch coverage
BMJ article
BMJ editorial</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Childbirth, Ferritin, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/n_NVOVC0zko/JWPodcast137.mp3" fileSize="12751281" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-137-clamping-the-umbilical-cord/2011/11/18/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/n_NVOVC0zko/JWPodcast137.mp3" length="12751281" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast137.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 136: Aspirin lowers colorectal risks in Lynch syndrome — what are the implications for everyone else?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/S7x1n0detKk/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-136-aspirin-lowers-colorectal-risks-in-lynch-syndrome-what-are-the-implications-for-everyone-else/2011/11/04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aspirin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorectal cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynch syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPP2 trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPP3 trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salicylates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir John Lynch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week&#8217;s Lancet article on the effect of aspirin on risks for colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome &#8212; a group at particularly high risk &#8212; may hold implications for preventing sporadic colon cancers. Our interview with Prof. Sir John Burn, the study&#8217;s first author, explores those implications as well speculations on why  we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Last week&#8217;s Lancet article on the effect of aspirin on risks for colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome &#8212; a group at particularly high risk &#8212; may hold implications for preventing sporadic colon cancers.</p>
<p>Our interview with Prof. Sir John Burn, the study&#8217;s first author, explores those implications as well speculations on why  we human beings aren&#8217;t getting the salicylates we were when our vegetables weren&#8217;t so pampered.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1031/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverge</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2811%2961049-0/abstract"><em>Lancet</em> abstract</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0801297">NEJM 2008 paper</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.capp3.org">The CAPP3 website</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=S7x1n0detKk:Eq1H79RaU9k:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/S7x1n0detKk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-136-aspirin-lowers-colorectal-risks-in-lynch-syndrome-what-are-the-implications-for-everyone-else/2011/11/04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:22:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Last week’s Lancet article on the effect of aspirin on risks for colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome — a group at particularly high risk — may hold implications for preventing sporadic colon cancers.
Our interview wi[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Last week’s Lancet article on the effect of aspirin on risks for colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome — a group at particularly high risk — may hold implications for preventing sporadic colon cancers.
Our interview with Prof. Sir John Burn, the study’s first author, explores those implications as well speculations on why  we human beings aren’t getting the salicylates we were when our vegetables weren’t so pampered.
Links:

Physician’s First Watch coverge (free)
Lancet abstract (free)
NEJM 2008 paper (free)
The CAPP3 website
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>aspirin, Audio, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/ZL6Yljrj4L4/JWPodcast136.mp3" fileSize="16187579" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-136-aspirin-lowers-colorectal-risks-in-lynch-syndrome-what-are-the-implications-for-everyone-else/2011/11/04/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/ZL6Yljrj4L4/JWPodcast136.mp3" length="16187579" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast136.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 135: HPV vaccine effective against anal intraepithelial neoplasia in MSM. Now, how to get it to young men before they’re sexually active?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/xfnMorQ8xps/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-135-hpv-vaccine-in-msm/2011/10/28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anal intraepithelial neoplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPV vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human papillomavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Palefsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexually Transmitted Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quadrivalent HPV vaccine was effective at preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasias in men who have sex with men, it was reported last week. The larger question is how to get it to young men before they become sexually active. We interview Dr. Joel Palefsky of UCSF, the first author on a paper in the New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The quadrivalent HPV vaccine was effective at preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasias in men who have sex with men, it was reported last week.</p>
<p>The larger question is how to get it to young men before they become sexually active.</p>
<p>We interview Dr. Joel Palefsky of UCSF, the first author on a paper in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> that demonstrates the vaccine&#8217;s efficacy.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1010971"><em>NEJM</em> abstract</a></li>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1027/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/general/">CDC&#8217;s sexually-transmitted diseases web site</a> (mentioned by Palefsky as a good, impartial resource on these questions)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=xfnMorQ8xps:jirOzMDS9b0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/xfnMorQ8xps" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-135-hpv-vaccine-in-msm/2011/10/28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:45</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
The quadrivalent HPV vaccine was effective at preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasias in men who have sex with men, it was reported last week.
The larger question is how to get it to young men before they become sexually active.
We interview Dr.[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
The quadrivalent HPV vaccine was effective at preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasias in men who have sex with men, it was reported last week.
The larger question is how to get it to young men before they become sexually active.
We interview Dr. Joel Palefsky of UCSF, the first author on a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine that demonstrates the vaccine’s efficacy.
Links:

NEJM abstract
Physician’s First Watch summary
CDC’s sexually-transmitted diseases web site (mentioned by Palefsky as a good, impartial resource on these questions)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Vaccination</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XfiO2aVyQao/JWPodcast135.mp3" fileSize="7775895" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-135-hpv-vaccine-in-msm/2011/10/28/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/XfiO2aVyQao/JWPodcast135.mp3" length="7775895" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast135.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 134: How (and why) surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus should change</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/7VpD9kN3MW4/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-134-how-and-why-surveillance-in-barretts-esophagus-should-change/2011/10/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrett's esophagus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esophageal adenocarcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adenocarcinoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esophageal cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esophageal dysplasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederik Hvid-Jensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barrett&#8217;s esophagus no longer carries the promise of esophageal cancer that it seemed to, but it bears watching, especially in the first year after the finding, when most cancers are found. The first author of this week&#8217;s New England Journal of Medicine study tracking the progression of a finding of Barrett&#8217;s over a median 5-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Barrett&#8217;s esophagus no longer carries the promise of esophageal cancer that it seemed to, but it bears watching, especially in the first year after the finding, when most cancers are found.</p>
<p>The first author of this week&#8217;s <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> study tracking the progression of a finding of Barrett&#8217;s over a median 5-year period offers some advice on how to proceed.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1013/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1103042"><em>NEJM</em> abstract</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=7VpD9kN3MW4:jk-eWLzSxYI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/7VpD9kN3MW4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-134-how-and-why-surveillance-in-barretts-esophagus-should-change/2011/10/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:11:03</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Barrett’s esophagus no longer carries the promise of esophageal cancer that it seemed to, but it bears watching, especially in the first year after the finding, when most cancers are found.
The first author of this week’s New England Jo[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Barrett’s esophagus no longer carries the promise of esophageal cancer that it seemed to, but it bears watching, especially in the first year after the finding, when most cancers are found.
The first author of this week’s New England Journal of Medicine study tracking the progression of a finding of Barrett’s over a median 5-year period offers some advice on how to proceed.
Links:

Physician’s First Watch summary
NEJM abstract
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/NACujC0aN6M/JWPodcast134.mp3" fileSize="7990308" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-134-how-and-why-surveillance-in-barretts-esophagus-should-change/2011/10/14/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/NACujC0aN6M/JWPodcast134.mp3" length="7990308" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast134.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 133: Over 50 years later, DES’s adverse effects continue</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/SVX7SNSNjU4/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-133-over-50-years-later-dess-adverse-effects-continue/2011/10/08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diethylstilbestrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug adverse effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diethylstilbestrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug adverse effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth L. Noller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert N. Hoover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cluster of clear-cell adenocarcinomas of the vagina in young women led to the realization some 40 years ago that almost all their mothers had taken diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy &#8212; a drug in wide use in the early 1950s. In a follow-up to that drug disaster, researchers (including one of the authors of the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A cluster of clear-cell adenocarcinomas of the vagina in young women led to the realization some 40 years ago that almost all their mothers had taken diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy &#8212; a drug in wide use in the early 1950s.</p>
<p>In a follow-up to that drug disaster, researchers (including one of the authors of the original reports in the early 1970s) have examined reproductive health in a large cohort of women exposed to DES in utero.  Their results were published last week in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, and they show that the health effects apparently continue beyond the reproductive years. With that cohort &#8212; the baby boomers &#8212; now entering the stage of their lives when health visits start to increase, it&#8217;s worthwhile for clinicians to be briefed on these long-term effects.</p>
<p>This week, we talk with two authors of the new report.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/1006/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> coverage (free)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1013961"><em>NEJM</em> article (free abstract)</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=SVX7SNSNjU4:wCadPeENONM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/SVX7SNSNjU4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-133-over-50-years-later-dess-adverse-effects-continue/2011/10/08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:16:29</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
A cluster of clear-cell adenocarcinomas of the vagina in young women led to the realization some 40 years ago that almost all their mothers had taken diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy — a drug in wide use in the early 1950s.
In a follow-up [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
A cluster of clear-cell adenocarcinomas of the vagina in young women led to the realization some 40 years ago that almost all their mothers had taken diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy — a drug in wide use in the early 1950s.
In a follow-up to that drug disaster, researchers (including one of the authors of the original reports in the early 1970s) have examined reproductive health in a large cohort of women exposed to DES in utero.  Their results were published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine, and they show that the health effects apparently continue beyond the reproductive years. With that cohort — the baby boomers — now entering the stage of their lives when health visits start to increase, it’s worthwhile for clinicians to be briefed on these long-term effects.
This week, we talk with two authors of the new report.
Links:
Physician’s First Watch coverage (free)
NEJM article (free abstract)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, DES, Diethylstilbestrol, pregnancy, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/sz6Z5OKPEzY/JWPodcast133.mp3" fileSize="11893629" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-133-over-50-years-later-dess-adverse-effects-continue/2011/10/08/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/sz6Z5OKPEzY/JWPodcast133.mp3" length="11893629" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast133.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast 132: In discussing a child’s overweight with parents, words matter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~3/KaVDQqgfcwo/</link>
		<comments>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-132-words-matter/2011/09/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Elia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overweight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childhood obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussions with patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overweight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Puhl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcasts.jwatch.org/?p=1524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words really do matter, and for clinicians discussing a child&#8217;s overweight with parents, words can hurt, stigmatize, and discourage parents from taking the right actions. In a brief interview, the author of a Pediatrics study talks about the best approach to take in these discussions. There are no &#8220;magic words,&#8221; rather the approach should involve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Words really do matter, and for clinicians discussing a child&#8217;s overweight with parents, words can hurt, stigmatize, and discourage parents from taking the right actions.</p>
<p>In a brief interview, the author of a <em>Pediatrics</em> study talks about the best approach to take in these discussions. There are no &#8220;magic words,&#8221; rather the approach should involve asking parents what words they feel most comfortable using in talking about how to address the problem.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://firstwatch.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2011/928/1"><em>Physician&#8217;s First Watch</em> summary</a> (free)</li>
<li><a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2011/09/21/peds.2010-3841.full.pdf+html"><em>Pediatrics</em> article</a> (free)</li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?a=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ClinicalConversations?i=KaVDQqgfcwo:tGZK6dv1TNQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~4/KaVDQqgfcwo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-132-words-matter/2011/09/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			
		<itunes:duration>0:10:00</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>
Words really do matter, and for clinicians discussing a child’s overweight with parents, words can hurt, stigmatize, and discourage parents from taking the right actions.
In a brief interview, the author of a Pediatrics study talks about the [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>
Words really do matter, and for clinicians discussing a child’s overweight with parents, words can hurt, stigmatize, and discourage parents from taking the right actions.
In a brief interview, the author of a Pediatrics study talks about the best approach to take in these discussions. There are no “magic words,” rather the approach should involve asking parents what words they feel most comfortable using in talking about how to address the problem.
Links:

Physician’s First Watch summary (free)
Pediatrics article (free)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Audio, Obesity, Overweight, Parents, Uncategorized</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Journal Watch</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/9y7bqkEIPDw/JWPodcast132.mp3" fileSize="7234847" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/index.php/podcast-132-words-matter/2011/09/30/</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ClinicalConversations/~5/9y7bqkEIPDw/JWPodcast132.mp3" length="7234847" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://podcasts.jwatch.org/media/JWPodcast132.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
	<media:credit role="author">Journal Watch</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating><media:description type="plain">Stay informed of the most relevant medical developments by subscribing to Clinical Conversations (http://podcasts.jwatch.org), from Journal Watch. This podcast features a round-up of the week's top medical stories, clinically-oriented interviews and liste</media:description></channel>
</rss>
