<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Coalition for a Safe and Secure Border</title><description>The purpose of this blog is to provide a venue for information sharing regarding the U.S. Border Patrol&#39;s plans to construct a fixed, permanent checkpoint on the I-19 corridor in Arizona.</description><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>24</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-2223327222681639534</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-19T17:02:23.598-07:00</atom:updated><title>Another Local Government Speaks Out Against Permanent Checkpoints</title><atom:summary type="text">Yesterday, the Pima County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted against the Border Patrol&#39;s plan to build permanent interior checkpoints in the Tucson sector.A copy of the Board&#39;s resolution can be found here.However, the most interesting thing that occurred yesterday is when Border Patrol Chief Agent Robert Gilbert came dashing through the door at the last minute indicating that he was not </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/09/another-local-government-speaks-out.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-7394679819011631526</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-18T13:56:20.210-07:00</atom:updated><title>Misleading and Incomplete Stats Department:  Record Pot Seizures in the Tucson Sector</title><atom:summary type="text">The Arizona Daily Star reports this morning reports that agents in the Tucson Border Patrol Sector have seized a record 845,000 tons of  marijuana so far this year. While the Border Patrol attributes this increase to being able to operate the checkpoint in a fixed location, the one thing this statistic does not address is the amount of pot NOT being seized by &quot;flanking&quot; the fixed checkpoint on </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/09/news-in-rooster-taking-credit-for-sun.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-410603928735842994</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-10T15:29:07.856-07:00</atom:updated><title>Blog Update:  Contact Your Senator or Representative</title><atom:summary type="text">In the column on the left, you will notice a box listing Arizona&#39;s United States Senators and Congressman/Congresswoman whose Congressional Districts are bounded by the US-Mexico border.  Clicking their names will take you directly to their Congressional web-sites where you can leave them a note.Before you do though, read the previous post.  That will give you some thoughts to share with Congress.</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/09/blog-update-contact-your-senator-or.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-7494287114326459229</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-07T13:43:07.261-07:00</atom:updated><title>GAO: &quot;Modest&quot;  Progress on Border Security;  Border Patrol:  Let&#39;s Spend $20-$30 million to Move the Border 30 Miles North</title><atom:summary type="text">In a &quot;highly critical&quot; report released yesterday by the General Accounting Office (GAO), the Border Patrol is found to be &quot;generally not achieving&quot; 7 out of 12 border security performance expectations.  What would any parent do if their child brought home a report card this bad.  Unfortunately, the GAO report card is a matter of national security as opposed to penmanship.The performance </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/09/gao-modest-progress-on-border-security.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-2315916807545011508</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-30T16:27:50.474-07:00</atom:updated><title>A Wednesday Grab-Bag.....</title><atom:summary type="text"> Lots of stuff on the permanent checkpoint issue.  Instead of multiple posts, it is aggregated into one posting. 1)         Apparently, the Border Patrol has a redefined mission.  According to a recent article in the Laredo (TX) Morning Times, &quot;Border Patrol agents don&#39;t have the responsibility of apprehending illegal immigrants, Carlos X. Carrillo, chief patrol agent for the Laredo sector, said </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/wednesday-grab-bag.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-3325282439713629233</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-27T15:30:26.180-07:00</atom:updated><title>Finally, a journalist doing his/her job....</title><atom:summary type="text">If you just read the local newspapers, you would have come to the conclusion that both subcommitees of Congresswoman Gifford&#39;s Permanent Checkpoint Work Group arrived at the same conclusion.  However, Sean Holstege of the Arizona Republic took the bold and dramatic steps of actually reading the subcommittee reports and correctly characterizing the subcommittees diametrically opposing views.Thanks</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/finally-journalist-doing-hisher-job.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-722442144048302891</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-22T11:19:13.786-07:00</atom:updated><title>13-3</title><atom:summary type="text">Last night, Congresswoman Gifford&#39;s Permanent Checkpoints Work Group voted 13-3 in favor of a comprehensive border security strategy and against permanent checkpoints.   That vote was greeted by a standing ovation from those in attendance.Although you would not have known this information reading the articles in the Daily Star.  I am not sure what meeting Portillo and McCombs were at, but they </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/13-3.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-1268819375005389398</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-21T11:56:21.200-07:00</atom:updated><title>Its Just the Constitution</title><atom:summary type="text">It is really scary when a senior leader of a federal law enforcement is so apparently uninformed about the U.S. Constitution.In today&#39;s Arizona Daily Star, the Border Patrol says about the permanent Border Patrol that &quot;it&#39;s not a question of  — but when, where and how it will be built.&quot;Well Chief Gilbert, an 8th grade civics lesson would appear to be in order.   Article 1, Section 8  of the U.S. </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/its-just-constitution.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-1070765201462049043</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-16T17:14:38.118-07:00</atom:updated><title>Timing is Everything Department</title><atom:summary type="text">The very same day the Nogales City Council passed a resolution endorsing the Border Patrol&#39;s plan for a permanent checkpoint, the local newspaper editorialized that they were a bad idea.The timing of the City Council&#39;s action is interesting -- Friday night at 6:00 PM.  How many governmental entities conduct important matters of public affairs on a Friday night?Nonetheless, the Nogales </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/timing-is-everything-department.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-1929766659721208788</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-13T16:19:10.963-07:00</atom:updated><title>Border Patrol --- &quot;Not Feasible&quot; or &quot;Prudent” to Defend Border</title><atom:summary type="text">In an article in Saturday&#39;s Green Valley News, Assistant Chief John Fitzpatrick said that, &quot;it’s not feasible &#39;or prudent&#39; to put all the Border Patrol’s assets on the border.&quot;  Instead he wants to build a fixed $20 million checkpoint 30 miles inland.Hmmm, not reasonable or prudent.   That&#39;s interesting, because the Border Patrol was able to effectively defend the Border in both the San Diego and</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/border-patrol-not-feasible-or-prudent.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-2777086462292067257</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-06T14:17:08.831-07:00</atom:updated><title>Editorial in the Green Valley News, Friday August 3</title><atom:summary type="text">In the it is better to post later than never category,  the Green Valley News editorial in last Friday&#39;s issue deserves attention.    It made many excellent points, but the next to last paragraph summarized the issue perfectly --- &quot;In our final analysis, the border checkpoints will make the problem worse in our part of the world.&quot;</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/08/editorial-in-green-valley-news-friday.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-4652111537250535549</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-27T10:11:25.579-07:00</atom:updated><title>Article in Today&#39;s Nogales International about the Tubac Townhall</title><atom:summary type="text">There is an article in today&#39; s Nogales International describing the CSSB townhall in Tubac.  The article said that the meeting, &quot;demonstrated a much stronger advocacy role than seen before and the unveiling of a new 15-minute Power Point and video program that presents a sophisticated argument against the Border Patrol&#39;s rationale for the checkpoint.&quot;</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/article-in-todays-nogales-international.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-8089858802451184614</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-25T08:25:38.455-07:00</atom:updated><title>New Feature Added to CSSB Blog -- Subscribe by E-Mail</title><atom:summary type="text">You will notice in the column on the left hand side of the page, a form had been added for you to subscribe by e-mail.  This will enable you to automatically receive in your e-mail inbox new posts to the blog.When you do this, an initial e-mail will be sent to you confirming your subscription by e-mail.  Just click on the link.Easy as 1,2,3:Put your e-mail in the box on the left hand side of the </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/new-feature-added-to-cssb-blog.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-6101685338427472510</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-25T12:54:27.977-07:00</atom:updated><title>Border Security --- Status Quo (aka Permanent Checkpoints) vs  Securing the Border -- Report from the Tubac Townhall</title><atom:summary type="text">Last night, an overflow crowd of over a 150 packed the Tubac Community Center to hear a presentation from the Citizens for a Safe and Secure Border.  The presentation focussed on the impacts of a permanent checkpoint and presented an alternative, comprehensive approach to border security.  Today&#39;s article in the Green Valley News provides a very good overview of the proceedings.</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/border-security-status-quo-aka.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-8583180678223509130</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-24T14:24:50.235-07:00</atom:updated><title>DON&#39;T FORGET -- Tubac Townhall on Permanent Checkpoints -- TONIGHT, Tues. July 24, 5:30 PM</title><atom:summary type="text">It is open to the public.  Bring your friends and your neighbors.It will take place at the Tubac Community Center, 50 Bridge Road.</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/dont-forget-tubac-townhall-on-permanent.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-1864991782610803243</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-24T14:09:34.377-07:00</atom:updated><title>More Gun Play near Tubac --- Smugglers &quot;Flanking&quot; Checkpoint</title><atom:summary type="text">The Arizona Daily Star reports this morning about a shootout occurring west of Tubac with drug smugglers.  The article points out that activity such as this is the result of smugglers &quot;flanking&quot; (going around) the checkpoint at kilometer 42.If the Border Patrol is successful in building a permanent checkpoint, expect more incidents such as this.A wise person recently pointed out what Benjamin </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/more-gun-play-near-tubac-smugglers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-5535738373504055897</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-22T11:50:12.829-07:00</atom:updated><title>CSSB Blog Mentioned on Arizona Daily Star Website</title><atom:summary type="text">In his &quot;Working the Line&quot; Border Blog, Arizona Daily Star Reporter Brady McCombs mentioned that the Coalition for a Safe and Secure Border had a blog up and running.</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/cssb-blog-mentioned-on-arizona-daily.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-2135373926334005983</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-22T11:40:28.208-07:00</atom:updated><title>Rep. Grijalva Joins the Chorus of Voices Speaking Out Against Permanent Checkpoint</title><atom:summary type="text">In a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Representative Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), strongly expressed his opposition to permanent checkpoints.  He cites the General Accounting Office study indicating that the Border Patrol does not have sufficient data to determine the effectiveness of permanent checkpoints.   He also refers to the real and significant impact to public safety that </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/rep-grijalva-joins-chorus-of-voices.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-7394484048670155713</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-17T11:30:34.127-07:00</atom:updated><title>Secure Border Initiative Public Meeting --- TONIGHT, Tuesday July 17, 7:00 to 10:00 PM</title><atom:summary type="text">Thanks to a very thorough newspaper reader, we have become aware of a Border Patrol public meeting on SBInet (and I mean thorough newspaper reader -- the public notice was buried in the dogs, cats and fish for sale section of the classified ads.)One can infer by this apparent minimal public notice effort, the Border Patrol does not want any public participation.The stated purpose of the meeting </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/secure-border-initiative-public-meeting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-4847108295461362786</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-17T07:15:12.833-07:00</atom:updated><title>&quot;Santa Cruz Sheriff against permanent checkpoint &quot;  --- KVOA</title><atom:summary type="text">Channel 4 ran a story last night on the permanent checkpoint issue.  Once again, frontline law enforcement officials made the case against a permanent Border Patrol checkpoint.  Sheriff Estrada said it will result in an increase in crime around the checkpoint and that smuggling and illegal immigration should be stopped at the border.Combined with concerns about checkpoint effectiveness in other </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/santa-cruz-sheriff-against-permanent.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-62891118269100513</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-15T11:59:43.191-07:00</atom:updated><title>Arizona Daily Star Article Underscores Flaws with Border Patrol&#39;s Permanent Checkpoint Strategy</title><atom:summary type="text">The Arizona Daily Star reports today that auto theft in Tucson is increasing contrary to the national trend.   The proximity to the border is an obvious reason for this increase.However, in the article, the reporter Jack Gillum points out that in San Diego the auto theft rate has dropped and, &quot;some partly credit the overall decrease in crime to tightened border security from Operation Gatekeeper,</atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/arizona-daily-star-article-underscores.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-5248173890708559339</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-15T12:31:36.630-07:00</atom:updated><title>Op-Ed in Today&#39;s Green Valley News</title><atom:summary type="text">Green Valley/Sahuarita Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Jim DiGiacomo&#39;s has an op-ed in today&#39;s Green Valley News.    It makes several the key points.Though the workgroup was assured repeatedly by Giffords that “no idea is off the table,” it appears that the Border Patrol is little interested in the community’s input.By the Border Patrol’s own admission, a permanent checkpoint will drive </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/digiacomos-op-ed-in-todays-green-valley.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-8969795298163445670</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-11T18:54:09.684-07:00</atom:updated><title>Former Congressman Speaks on Permanent Checkpoints</title><atom:summary type="text">Former Congressman Kolbe was on KUAT&#39;s Arizona Illustrated last night and among the topics he addressed was the Border Patrol&#39;s ongoing effort to construct a permanent checkpoint.  You will find his comments on this topic at approximately 3:39 into the segment.Former Congressman Kolbe&#39;s longstanding opposition to these checkpoints is well known.  In fact, he was able to stop the Border Patrol </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/former-congressman-speaks-on-permanent.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-516478121542405504.post-4242275980834522434</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-16T10:39:38.731-07:00</atom:updated><title>Welcome to the Citizens for a Safe Secure Border Blog</title><atom:summary type="text">Welcome to the Coalition for a Safe and Secure Border (CSSB) blog.  The purpose of this blog is to share information about the Border Patrol&#39;s plans to construct a permanent checkpoint on the I-19 corridor between Nogales and Tucson.  Many residents and law enforcement officials are concerned about the impact that this checkpoint will have on their safety.  A fixed checkpoint is essentially a </atom:summary><link>http://secureborder.blogspot.com/2007/07/citizens-for-safe-secure-border.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (CSSB)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>