<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>CodeScheme</title>
	<link>http://www.codescheme.net</link>
	<description>WordPress, Web Development, Programming</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Codescheme" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">Codescheme</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>WordPress 2.7 Theme Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/30/wordpress-27-theme-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/30/wordpress-27-theme-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/30/wordpress-27-theme-updates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alpen3col is now updated to handle all the new functions available in WordPress 2.7 - there&#8217;s something of a lack of configurability in wp_list_comments(), which will presumably be rectified as time goes on&#8230;
Other themes will follow as time and the need to earn actual money permit&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/22/free-wordpress-theme-alpen-3column/">Alpen3col</a> is now updated to handle all the new functions available in WordPress 2.7 - there&#8217;s something of a lack of configurability in wp_list_comments(), which will presumably be rectified as time goes on&#8230;</p>
<p>Other themes will follow as time and the need to earn actual money permit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/30/wordpress-27-theme-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 2.7 update</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/15/wordpress-27-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/15/wordpress-27-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/15/wordpress-27-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far as I have tested, all themes appear compatible with WordPress version 2.7 in their current versions - if you do find anything, please let me know. There may be a few advanced features unavailable as yet, due to the relevant template tags not yet catered for.
The question of whether you want to run [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far as I have tested, all themes appear compatible with WordPress version 2.7 in their current versions - if you do find anything, please let me know. There may be a few advanced features unavailable as yet, due to the relevant template tags not yet catered for.<br />
The question of whether you want to run 2.7 or not, I think is an open one - there seems no change in the overall situation following 2.5 and 2.6, just different admin bugs  - image rollovers on the admin submit buttons aren&#8217;t right, Firefox 2,3, 800px resolution and the media uploads aren&#8217;t happy with Windows-version PHP.  Linux, good, but that isn&#8217;t everybody, unfortunately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/12/15/wordpress-27-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO plugin</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/28/seo-plugin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/28/seo-plugin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/28/seo-plugin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still on the search for a SEO plugin for WordPress that gives  the extras that might be needed for clients - without removing the flexibility, such as there is, even further from the standard setup of page titles, digests etc.
This one isn&#8217;t bad - wpSEO - although the page is German, which might put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still on the search for a SEO plugin for WordPress that gives  the extras that might be needed for clients - without removing the flexibility, such as there is, even further from the standard setup of page titles, digests etc.</p>
<p>This one isn&#8217;t bad - <a href="http://www.wpseo.de/" rel="nofollow">wpSEO</a> - although the page is German, which might put some off - no need to worry, it&#8217;s got the language files - and all the usual SEO stuff - duplicate content elimination, customised meta tags / page titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/28/seo-plugin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 2.7 arrival</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/21/wordpress-27-arrival/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/21/wordpress-27-arrival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/21/wordpress-27-arrival/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the imminent arrival of WordPress 2.7, there will be significant changes, most particularly to the way a theme brings comments to the page.
As it seems at present, all themes produced prior to WP 2.7 will be rendered obsolete - in the sense of not producing the full 2.7 functionality&#8230; whether you may want this, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the imminent arrival of WordPress 2.7, there will be significant changes, most particularly to the way a theme brings comments to the page.</p>
<p>As it seems at present, all themes produced prior to WP 2.7 will be rendered obsolete - in the sense of not producing the full 2.7 functionality&#8230; whether you may want this, another matter&#8230;</p>
<p>We will be working through the back catalogue, and bringing all themes to WP2.7 capability. By the nature of things, this isn&#8217;t going to be happening overnight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/21/wordpress-27-arrival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Pingbacks and Trackbacks - what’s the difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/02/wordpress-pingbacks-and-trackbacks-whats-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/02/wordpress-pingbacks-and-trackbacks-whats-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/02/wordpress-pingbacks-and-trackbacks-whats-the-difference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you write a blog post that links to another blog post (or sometimes just web page) and you have everything set up right, a pingback sends a notification to that target blog with information about your post.
A trackback can be sent even if you don&#8217;t link to the target post - you have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0 0 0 1px;padding: 2px; border:1px solid #aaa;" src="http://www.codescheme.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ping.jpg" alt="ping.jpg" align="right" />If you write a blog post that links to another blog post (or sometimes just web page) and you have everything set up right, a pingback sends a notification to that target blog with information about your post.</p>
<p>A trackback can be sent even if you don&#8217;t link to the target post - you have to enter the &#8216;trackback url&#8217; of the target blog post in the relevant input field (&#8217;Send trackbacks to&#8217;) when writing your post - which will give the same result. A blog will generally supply the link location for trackbacks to its posts.<br />
 <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/02/wordpress-pingbacks-and-trackbacks-whats-the-difference/#more-309" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/02/wordpress-pingbacks-and-trackbacks-whats-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Functions and Versioning</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/wordpress-functions-and-versioning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/wordpress-functions-and-versioning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/wordpress-functions-and-versioning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether progress in WordPress development continues at the same pace or not, the issue of the capability of a theme to display all new functions, template tags etc, is a live one.
Referred to as compatibility, this perhaps isn&#8217;t quite accurate - a theme will (should) work with a range of WordPress versions, (for various reasons, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether progress in WordPress development continues at the same pace or not, the issue of the capability of a theme to display all new functions, template tags etc, is a live one.</p>
<p>Referred to as compatibility, this perhaps isn&#8217;t quite accurate - a theme will (should) work with a range of WordPress versions, (for various reasons, good and bad, we don&#8217;t all heed the so-named &#8216;required&#8217; updates) - however, the question is whether a theme will supply all the functionality of an installed version of WordPress.<br />
 <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/wordpress-functions-and-versioning/#more-308" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/wordpress-functions-and-versioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Public PageRank Update</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/google-public-pagerank-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/google-public-pagerank-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/google-public-pagerank-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Google springs a minor surprise, with an update of public PR after approx 2 months, rather than the 3 months we had become accustomed to. This after the rather wayward schedule of 2007.
And so the (conspiracy) theories come out of the woodwork.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.codescheme.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ss075.png" alt="ss075.png" align="right" height="63" width="133" />So Google springs a minor surprise, with an update of public PR after approx 2 months, rather than the 3 months we had become accustomed to. This after the rather wayward schedule of 2007.</p>
<p>And so the (conspiracy) theories come out of the woodwork.<br />
 <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/google-public-pagerank-update/#more-307" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/10/01/google-public-pagerank-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter API limits</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/twitter-api-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/twitter-api-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/twitter-api-limits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Becoming fractionally tired of these Twitter API limits, which seem to lock everything down fairly early on the day and keep everything slow thereafter.
The canard, (and I&#8217;m sure it is only that), that Twitter is a bit wonky due to the Ruby becomes self-fulfilling publicity, simply due to the prominence and focus of the site&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becoming fractionally tired of these Twitter API limits, which seem to lock everything down fairly early on the day and keep everything slow thereafter.</p>
<p>The canard, (and I&#8217;m sure it is only that), that Twitter is a bit wonky due to the Ruby becomes self-fulfilling publicity, simply due to the prominence and focus of the site&#8230; which is distinctly unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/twitter-api-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 2.7 Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-27-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-27-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-27-comments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems &#8216;official&#8217; - poor honest WordPress Theme designers have a load more work in prospect to drag their themes into compatibility with the projected 2.7 version.
Where this all fits with the discussion about Intense Debate still isn&#8217;t elucidated - fair enough, this is a major issue and not going to be decided and promulgated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems &#8216;official&#8217; - poor honest WordPress Theme designers have a load more work in prospect to drag their themes into compatibility with the projected 2.7 version.</p>
<p>Where this all fits with the discussion about <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/24/wordpress-and-intense-debate-commenting/">Intense Debate</a> still isn&#8217;t elucidated - fair enough, this is a major issue and not going to be decided and promulgated in a week or so.<br />
 <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-27-comments/#more-304" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-27-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress, jQuery and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-jquery-and-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-jquery-and-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Wolfe</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-jquery-and-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress has jQuery in it - it&#8217;s what makes the AJAX in the admin do its stuff and is there to be &#8216;re-used&#8217; in any site customisations you fancy.
jQuery now announce that Nokia and Microsoft are including the  into their official application development platform.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress has jQuery in it - it&#8217;s what makes the AJAX in the admin do its stuff and is there to be &#8216;re-used&#8217; in any site customisations you fancy.</p>
<p>jQuery now <a href="http://jquery.com/blog/2008/09/28/jquery-microsoft-nokia/">announce</a> that Nokia and Microsoft are including the  into their official application development platform.<br />
 <a href="http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-jquery-and-microsoft/#more-303" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codescheme.net/2008/09/30/wordpress-jquery-and-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
