<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Column 2</title>
	
	<link>http://www.column2.com</link>
	<description>BPM, Enterprise 2.0 and technology trends in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:31:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Column2Comments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="column2comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on BPMN 2.0 Industry Update by Best practice: let the BPMS own the model, not BPMN or XPDL | VOSibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/bpmn-2-0-industry-update/comment-page-1/#comment-13705</link>
		<dc:creator>Best practice: let the BPMS own the model, not BPMN or XPDL | VOSibilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/bpmn-2-0-industry-update/#comment-13705</guid>
		<description>[...] Kemsley commented on  the XPDL 2.2 effort to support the interchange of BPMN 2.0 model. I agree with her that it is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kemsley commented on  the XPDL 2.2 effort to support the interchange of BPMN 2.0 model. I agree with her that it is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lean Six Sigma and Process Improvement conference, Toronto by Six Sigma Blogs » Blog Archive » Six Sigma</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/lean-six-sigma-and-process-improvement-conference-toronto/comment-page-1/#comment-13704</link>
		<dc:creator>Six Sigma Blogs » Blog Archive » Six Sigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/lean-six-sigma-and-process-improvement-conference-toronto/#comment-13704</guid>
		<description>[...] Column 2 : Lean Six Sigma and Process Improvement conference, Toronto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Column 2 : Lean Six Sigma and Process Improvement conference, Toronto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What To Expect From The BPM Market in 2010 by Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-13703</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/#comment-13703</guid>
		<description>I think when the final #'s come out, the difference is simply that Lombardi had a bigger/better business than some folks realized.  Maybe a smaller business than some others assumed?  Its always hard to tell with private companies who don't publish much in terms of hard numbers.    But clearly Lombardi was bigger than Savvion and was purchased for quite a bit more.  

When I hear some of the folks say "we're not for sale" I have to ask-  really? Not for $100MM?  $200MM?  $500MM?  $1B?  I mean seriously, if you are a rational business person, there is some dollar amount that would make you crazy to say no, unless you just don't want to lose control of your baby at any cost.  If your employees are also shareholders/owners, and you refuse a big payday, you're also refusing it for the employees and shareholders.  

Now, if you're not so dead set against selling, the bar is a little lower - you just want something that is a good compensation today, for future value.  Either way, there's a price at which it would be irrational to not sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when the final #&#8217;s come out, the difference is simply that Lombardi had a bigger/better business than some folks realized.  Maybe a smaller business than some others assumed?  Its always hard to tell with private companies who don&#8217;t publish much in terms of hard numbers.    But clearly Lombardi was bigger than Savvion and was purchased for quite a bit more.  </p>
<p>When I hear some of the folks say &#8220;we&#8217;re not for sale&#8221; I have to ask-  really? Not for $100MM?  $200MM?  $500MM?  $1B?  I mean seriously, if you are a rational business person, there is some dollar amount that would make you crazy to say no, unless you just don&#8217;t want to lose control of your baby at any cost.  If your employees are also shareholders/owners, and you refuse a big payday, you&#8217;re also refusing it for the employees and shareholders.  </p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;re not so dead set against selling, the bar is a little lower &#8211; you just want something that is a good compensation today, for future value.  Either way, there&#8217;s a price at which it would be irrational to not sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gurbaksh Chahal at DemoCamp 25 by Pimping Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/gurbaksh-chahal-at-democamp-25/comment-page-1/#comment-13701</link>
		<dc:creator>Pimping Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/gurbaksh-chahal-at-democamp-25/#comment-13701</guid>
		<description>[...] Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25By Sandy Kemsley on February 6, 2010  After we heard from Gurbaksh Chahal, the rest of DemoCamp proceeded as usual. We were in the Ted Rogers School of Management, part of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25By Sandy Kemsley on February 6, 2010  After we heard from Gurbaksh Chahal, the rest of DemoCamp proceeded as usual. We were in the Ted Rogers School of Management, part of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gurbaksh Chahal at DemoCamp 25 by Column 2 : Pimping Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/gurbaksh-chahal-at-democamp-25/comment-page-1/#comment-13696</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 : Pimping Your Fish at DemoCamp Toronto 25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/gurbaksh-chahal-at-democamp-25/#comment-13696</guid>
		<description>[...] we heard from Gurbaksh Chahal, the rest of DemoCamp proceeded as usual. We were in the Ted Rogers School of Management, part of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we heard from Gurbaksh Chahal, the rest of DemoCamp proceeded as usual. We were in the Ted Rogers School of Management, part of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2010-02-04 by What could be more strategic than process or decision management? – Commercial Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/links-for-2010-02-04/comment-page-1/#comment-13690</link>
		<dc:creator>What could be more strategic than process or decision management? – Commercial Intelligence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/links-for-2010-02-04/#comment-13690</guid>
		<description>[...] folks from Knowledge Partners have a post that I found thanks to Sandy Kemsley, whose blog often provides good pointers.  This article talks about the decision perspective on business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] folks from Knowledge Partners have a post that I found thanks to Sandy Kemsley, whose blog often provides good pointers.  This article talks about the decision perspective on business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BPM, Collaboration and Social Networking #brf by Gestion de l’Information, BPM et IBM, un résumé de l’actualité | BPM Bulletin</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2009/11/bpm-collaboration-and-social-networking-brf/comment-page-1/#comment-13686</link>
		<dc:creator>Gestion de l’Information, BPM et IBM, un résumé de l’actualité | BPM Bulletin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2009/11/bpm-collaboration-and-social-networking-brf/#comment-13686</guid>
		<description>[...] Jim Sinur du Gartner (Don’t let the winds of change blow BPM away) ou encore Sandy Kemsley (en novembre sur Column2). L’arrivée des réseaux sociaux en entreprise est une réalité, les comportements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jim Sinur du Gartner (Don&#8217;t let the winds of change blow BPM away) ou encore Sandy Kemsley (en novembre sur Column2). L&#8217;arrivée des réseaux sociaux en entreprise est une réalité, les comportements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What To Expect From The BPM Market in 2010 by Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-13685</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/#comment-13685</guid>
		<description>Alex, I'm not the typical listener, so don't take it too seriously!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I&#8217;m not the typical listener, so don&#8217;t take it too seriously!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What To Expect From The BPM Market in 2010 by Alex Neihaus</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-13684</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Neihaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/#comment-13684</guid>
		<description>Oh...and the Alfresco replay is posted: http://bit.ly/dlSkaz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;and the Alfresco replay is posted: <a href="http://bit.ly/dlSkaz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dlSkaz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What To Expect From The BPM Market in 2010 by Alex Neihaus</title>
		<link>http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-13683</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Neihaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.column2.com/2010/02/what-to-expect-from-the-bpm-market-in-2010/#comment-13683</guid>
		<description>Not to worry, Sandy. _Of course_ we want to do more webinars with you. We can't please everyone all the time...so if this webinar didn't grab you, it's on us to do better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry, Sandy. _Of course_ we want to do more webinars with you. We can&#8217;t please everyone all the time&#8230;so if this webinar didn&#8217;t grab you, it&#8217;s on us to do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
