<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anima Ex Machina</title>
	
	<link>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid</link>
	<description>The blog of Hector Zenil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForAnimaExMachina" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforanimaexmachina" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on On single and shortest axioms for Boolean logic by John Halleck</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/a-WrP85mXfY/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>John Halleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=133#comment-31805</guid>
		<description>Opps...   a English reference for Tarski's claim is:

Alfred Tarski [1956] Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Papers from
1923 to 1938 (Translated by J. H. Woodger), Clarendon Press / Oxford UP,
Oxford UK 1956. (A second revised edition has been issued by J. Corcoran
(ed.), at Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis IN, in 19832 .)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps&#8230;   a English reference for Tarski&#8217;s claim is:</p>
<p>Alfred Tarski [1956] Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Papers from<br />
1923 to 1938 (Translated by J. H. Woodger), Clarendon Press / Oxford UP,<br />
Oxford UK 1956. (A second revised edition has been issued by J. Corcoran<br />
(ed.), at Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis IN, in 19832 .)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/on-single-and-shortest-axioms/comment-page-1#comment-31805</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On single and shortest axioms for Boolean logic by John Halleck</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/qs3BlDOzUE0/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>John Halleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=133#comment-31804</guid>
		<description>If you have an interest in single axioms for systems, you might be interested in Tarsi's 1930 result, which is that if you have a logic defined by axioms, the rule of Modus Ponens, and the rule of Uniform Substitution, then is MUST have a single axiom basis if it can prove two specific theorems he gave.

Giving names to the theorems for discussion:
I: Cpp                          p -&gt; p
K: CpCqp                    p -&gt; (q -&gt; p)
C: CCpCqrCqCpr         (p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; (q -&gt; (p -&gt; r))
D: CpCqCCpCqrr        p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; r))
E: CpCqCCpCqrCsr    p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; (s -&gt; r)))
C*: CpCqCCpCqrr       p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; r))

Tarski proved the theorems K + D and the theorems K + E insured the existence of a single axiom for the system. 

Since then  the provability of the following pairs proved the existence of a single axiom for the system.

K+C, K+C*, I+E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have an interest in single axioms for systems, you might be interested in Tarsi&#8217;s 1930 result, which is that if you have a logic defined by axioms, the rule of Modus Ponens, and the rule of Uniform Substitution, then is MUST have a single axiom basis if it can prove two specific theorems he gave.</p>
<p>Giving names to the theorems for discussion:<br />
I: Cpp                          p -&gt; p<br />
K: CpCqp                    p -&gt; (q -&gt; p)<br />
C: CCpCqrCqCpr         (p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; (q -&gt; (p -&gt; r))<br />
D: CpCqCCpCqrr        p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; r))<br />
E: CpCqCCpCqrCsr    p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; (s -&gt; r)))<br />
C*: CpCqCCpCqrr       p -&gt; (q -&gt; ((p -&gt; (q -&gt; r)) -&gt; r))</p>
<p>Tarski proved the theorems K + D and the theorems K + E insured the existence of a single axiom for the system. </p>
<p>Since then  the provability of the following pairs proved the existence of a single axiom for the system.</p>
<p>K+C, K+C*, I+E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/on-single-and-shortest-axioms/comment-page-1#comment-31804</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards a Web of One… by Frida</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/8ptwU7rJtBQ/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Frida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=912#comment-30324</guid>
		<description>Muy interesante TED Talk. Qué curioso que en mi clase pasada tocábamos este problema. Desde mi perspectiva lo que debemos fomentar es un uso crítico de Internet y de las redes sociales. Los problemas continúan siendo los mismos, la tecnología mejora, pero necesitamos educarnos para su mejor empleo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muy interesante TED Talk. Qué curioso que en mi clase pasada tocábamos este problema. Desde mi perspectiva lo que debemos fomentar es un uso crítico de Internet y de las redes sociales. Los problemas continúan siendo los mismos, la tecnología mejora, pero necesitamos educarnos para su mejor empleo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/towards-a-web-of-one/comment-page-1#comment-30324</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Faster Smarter? IBM’s Watson Search Engine Approach to Beat Humans by anima ex machina</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/eKouHvRD9mk/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>anima ex machina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=522#comment-23869</guid>
		<description>@Hector
the link to video is broken (FF v5, MAC OSX)  ** is now fixed **

nota : 
i like the name of this site !

cheers from France

Sebastien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hector<br />
the link to video is broken (FF v5, MAC OSX)  ** is now fixed **</p>
<p>nota :<br />
i like the name of this site !</p>
<p>cheers from France</p>
<p>Sebastien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/is-faster-smarter-ibms-watson-computer-wins-jeopardy-against-humans/comment-page-1#comment-23869</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression-based Investigation of Cellular Automata, A Phase Transition Coefficient and a Conjecture Related to Universal Computation by Hector Zenil</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForAnimaExMachina/~3/9Xnr2hH9VLo/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector Zenil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/?p=448#comment-23837</guid>
		<description>It would. If you capture the change of behavior by taking pictures of the system for long enough, you would see that the transition coefficient will make the derivative to fall into the new class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would. If you capture the change of behavior by taking pictures of the system for long enough, you would see that the transition coefficient will make the derivative to fall into the new class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.mathrix.org/liquid/archives/compression-based-investigation-of-the-dynamical-properties-of-cellular-automata-phase-transition-classification-and-a-universality-conjecture/comment-page-1#comment-23837</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

