<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BeatingTheIndex.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.beatingtheindex.com</link>
	<description>Free and independent analysis in the oil and gas sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforbeatingtheindexcom" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on The Viking Oil Play in Alberta by My Own Advisor</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/IIICDFDQJ1U/</link>
		<dc:creator>My Own Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3261#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>Wow, detailed post.

I think I understood most of it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, detailed post.</p>
<p>I think I understood most of it <img src='http://www.beatingtheindex.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/IIICDFDQJ1U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/the-viking-oil-play-in-alberta/comment-page-1/#comment-5731</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Viking Oil Play in Saskatchewan by The Viking Oil Play in Alberta | BeatingTheIndex.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/AcQzSDUCTxA/</link>
		<dc:creator>The Viking Oil Play in Alberta | BeatingTheIndex.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3113#comment-5729</guid>
		<description>[...] part of our series covering oil production from the Viking formation; the first post covered the Viking oil play in Saskatchewan. Today’s post will cover the Viking oil play in Alberta along with the notable players [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part of our series covering oil production from the Viking formation; the first post covered the Viking oil play in Saskatchewan. Today’s post will cover the Viking oil play in Alberta along with the notable players [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/AcQzSDUCTxA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/the-viking-oil-play-in-saskatchewan/comment-page-1/#comment-5729</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Mich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/puAbXvS40rU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5725</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,

US based companies trade on different metrics, don't waste your time comparing with CAD companies.

As for ARW, they are oil weighted so they sure command a higher $/BOED and at $55k they are starting to get cheap.

Cheers,

Mich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>US based companies trade on different metrics, don&#8217;t waste your time comparing with CAD companies.</p>
<p>As for ARW, they are oil weighted so they sure command a higher $/BOED and at $55k they are starting to get cheap.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mich</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/puAbXvS40rU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5725</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Mich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/b2jf0E0J2C0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you on SEQ! Divvy not sustainable BUT if I want to pay for a natural gas weighted company in the Peace River Arch, I would go with SEQ rather than others. SEQ is financially in better shape than gasers like WDN.

You seem to like the natural gas weighted players :)

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you on SEQ! Divvy not sustainable BUT if I want to pay for a natural gas weighted company in the Peace River Arch, I would go with SEQ rather than others. SEQ is financially in better shape than gasers like WDN.</p>
<p>You seem to like the natural gas weighted players <img src='http://www.beatingtheindex.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/b2jf0E0J2C0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eagle Energy Trust: Permian Basin Asset Ensures Sustainability by Weekly Product Review Roundup and Carnival Gratitude | Finance Product Reviews - Be Informed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/s2A0FTiM1mc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Product Review Roundup and Carnival Gratitude | Finance Product Reviews - Be Informed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3243#comment-5722</guid>
		<description>[...] Beating Broke presents Money Rules by Jean Chatzky , a book review. Card Hub presents Is the LivingSocial Credit Card Worth Getting? Free From broke presents The Best Airline Miles Credit Cards  Amateur Financier presents Book Review – The Art of Non-Conformity One Money Design presents Saving Money For College – A Upromise Review Nicole and Maggie: Grumpy Rumblings presents All the money in the world: A book review PT Money presents My Accountant Reviews QuickBooks Online vs. Desktop Card Hub reviews Bank of America’s New Travel Rewards Credit Cards Beating The Index reviews Eagle Energy Trust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beating Broke presents Money Rules by Jean Chatzky , a book review. Card Hub presents Is the LivingSocial Credit Card Worth Getting? Free From broke presents The Best Airline Miles Credit Cards  Amateur Financier presents Book Review – The Art of Non-Conformity One Money Design presents Saving Money For College – A Upromise Review Nicole and Maggie: Grumpy Rumblings presents All the money in the world: A book review PT Money presents My Accountant Reviews QuickBooks Online vs. Desktop Card Hub reviews Bank of America’s New Travel Rewards Credit Cards Beating The Index reviews Eagle Energy Trust [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/s2A0FTiM1mc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/eagle-energy-trust-permian-basin-asset-ensures-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-5722</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eagle Energy Trust: Permian Basin Asset Ensures Sustainability by Weekend Reading: Happy Mother’s Day Edition + Announcing the iPad Winners + My Trip to Grenada and Some News | Invest It Wisely</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/t7qyLzA-JKg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading: Happy Mother’s Day Edition + Announcing the iPad Winners + My Trip to Grenada and Some News | Invest It Wisely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 21:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3243#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>[...] Eagle Energy Trust: Permian Basin Asset Ensures Sustainability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eagle Energy Trust: Permian Basin Asset Ensures Sustainability [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/t7qyLzA-JKg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/eagle-energy-trust-permian-basin-asset-ensures-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Lee Roth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/zqhZjIpDzlU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>Hey  Mich,

I  just  checked  SEQ.TO (Shoreline).
The divy is not sustainable imo.
Their annual cash flow can not support it and I believe they will cut it soon. It is a divy trap.

The divy expense is $4,5 M annually.
The annual cash flow of SEQ.TO is much less than the divy expense.
So The annual cash flow can not fund both the divy and the capex.
So they borrow to pay the divy. Thus I can not count on it my investing position, if any.


Cheers !
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey  Mich,</p>
<p>I  just  checked  SEQ.TO (Shoreline).<br />
The divy is not sustainable imo.<br />
Their annual cash flow can not support it and I believe they will cut it soon. It is a divy trap.</p>
<p>The divy expense is $4,5 M annually.<br />
The annual cash flow of SEQ.TO is much less than the divy expense.<br />
So The annual cash flow can not fund both the divy and the capex.<br />
So they borrow to pay the divy. Thus I can not count on it my investing position, if any.</p>
<p>Cheers !<br />
Lee</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/zqhZjIpDzlU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Lee Roth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/c91ujNuw1Uc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5719</guid>
		<description>Dear   Mich,

The  us based companies are not as much oily as you think. 
However  they  are  much higher valued than the canadian ones. So it is not an oil mix thing. To support this:
GEOI has 65% oil and MQL.V (Marquee) has also 60% oil. Their valuation gap is  huge.


MHR (Magnum) has a 50% oil same like  PCE.TO (Pace)
Again  the  valuation  gap  (per  boepd,  per  cash  flow,  per  NAV)  between   MHR  and  PCE.TO  is  huge.


I had  a look at   ARW.V  (Aroway) which has a  55,000 $/boepd  valuation currently and trade  20 times the annual cash flow. That being said, it is not a bargain  for me  currently. I ll check the other company you mentioned soon and I ll provide you my feedback.


Cheers !
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear   Mich,</p>
<p>The  us based companies are not as much oily as you think.<br />
However  they  are  much higher valued than the canadian ones. So it is not an oil mix thing. To support this:<br />
GEOI has 65% oil and MQL.V (Marquee) has also 60% oil. Their valuation gap is  huge.</p>
<p>MHR (Magnum) has a 50% oil same like  PCE.TO (Pace)<br />
Again  the  valuation  gap  (per  boepd,  per  cash  flow,  per  NAV)  between   MHR  and  PCE.TO  is  huge.</p>
<p>I had  a look at   ARW.V  (Aroway) which has a  55,000 $/boepd  valuation currently and trade  20 times the annual cash flow. That being said, it is not a bargain  for me  currently. I ll check the other company you mentioned soon and I ll provide you my feedback.</p>
<p>Cheers !<br />
Lee</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/c91ujNuw1Uc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5719</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Occupy the Garden (plus some links) | 101 Centavos</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/9tPIFcl1rKg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Occupy the Garden (plus some links) | 101 Centavos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>[...] Mich @ Beating the Index has more energy news from EIA, and a clutch of interesting links, including one from here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mich @ Beating the Index has more energy news from EIA, and a clutch of interesting links, including one from here. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/9tPIFcl1rKg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5718</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eagle Energy Trust: Permian Basin Asset Ensures Sustainability by Occupy the Garden (plus some links) | 101 Centavos</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/EikfplO4-Xc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Occupy the Garden (plus some links) | 101 Centavos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3243#comment-5717</guid>
		<description>[...] More on investing in energy plays, Mich @ Beating The Index writes at length on Eagle Energy Trust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on investing in energy plays, Mich @ Beating The Index writes at length on Eagle Energy Trust [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/EikfplO4-Xc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/eagle-energy-trust-permian-basin-asset-ensures-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-5717</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Mich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/cnkvzbtg2Oo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>Lee, if you want a pure player on the Peace River Arch area, try Aroway Energy and Shoreline. In fact, if you like natural gas weighted companies, I suggest you take a close look at shoreline as it comes with a nice divvy!

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, if you want a pure player on the Peace River Arch area, try Aroway Energy and Shoreline. In fact, if you like natural gas weighted companies, I suggest you take a close look at shoreline as it comes with a nice divvy!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/cnkvzbtg2Oo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5716</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Mich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/5deyL1wnXxI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5715</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,

Don't waste your time comparing US valuations to Canadian ones. US companies trade at higher multiples vs Canadian ones.

All of the NG weighted companies may have a great land base but reality is $3 gas is not going to cut it vs $90+ oil. 

I like PACE and it would be the only one I would buy amongst all of the NG stocks mentioned above. They are close to balancing their commodity weighting and have a nice land base. BUT between $25 netbacks and $50 netbacks I would buy the $50 netbacks simply because the oil weighted companies are also on sale!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t waste your time comparing US valuations to Canadian ones. US companies trade at higher multiples vs Canadian ones.</p>
<p>All of the NG weighted companies may have a great land base but reality is $3 gas is not going to cut it vs $90+ oil. </p>
<p>I like PACE and it would be the only one I would buy amongst all of the NG stocks mentioned above. They are close to balancing their commodity weighting and have a nice land base. BUT between $25 netbacks and $50 netbacks I would buy the $50 netbacks simply because the oil weighted companies are also on sale!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/5deyL1wnXxI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5715</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Mich</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/obiME4Vb2BI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>You're welcome Kevin, 
I think with Iran exporting post sanctions will push oil prices lower once the market realizes the market is well supplied on top of the Iranian volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Kevin,<br />
I think with Iran exporting post sanctions will push oil prices lower once the market realizes the market is well supplied on top of the Iranian volumes.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/obiME4Vb2BI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5714</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by Lee Roth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/a_kHMe-vuv0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 10:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5713</guid>
		<description>PCE.TO   (Pace)   has significant   land  in  the  oily  Peace  River  Arch. The  insiders   have  bought  higher, and  the  company  keeps  buying  back  shares  under  the  current  share  repurchase   program.
PCE.TO    trade   currently  just  2  times  the  annual  cash  flow !


The   oil  growth   q after  q   is  significant  too.
I   also   added   to  average   down , Dunn.
My  average  now  is  at   5,93 CAD.


Have  you  all  a  good  weekend!
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PCE.TO   (Pace)   has significant   land  in  the  oily  Peace  River  Arch. The  insiders   have  bought  higher, and  the  company  keeps  buying  back  shares  under  the  current  share  repurchase   program.<br />
PCE.TO    trade   currently  just  2  times  the  annual  cash  flow !</p>
<p>The   oil  growth   q after  q   is  significant  too.<br />
I   also   added   to  average   down , Dunn.<br />
My  average  now  is  at   5,93 CAD.</p>
<p>Have  you  all  a  good  weekend!<br />
Lee</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/a_kHMe-vuv0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5713</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekend Edition: IEA Raises Oil Demand for 2012 by P. W. Dunn</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~3/7kDg6DHGGJw/</link>
		<dc:creator>P. W. Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatingtheindex.com/?p=3254#comment-5712</guid>
		<description>Lee, I was looking at Pace too.  I have some shares at nearly double its current price ($8.062)--and the company seems to have really improved.  I am waiting on some cash coming to my TD Waterhouse accounts from Questrade, and then I will probably double down on PCE.  Any thoughts Mich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, I was looking at Pace too.  I have some shares at nearly double its current price ($8.062)&#8211;and the company seems to have really improved.  I am waiting on some cash coming to my TD Waterhouse accounts from Questrade, and then I will probably double down on PCE.  Any thoughts Mich?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBeatingtheindexcom/~4/7kDg6DHGGJw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.beatingtheindex.com/weekend-edition-iea-raises-oil-demand-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-5712</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.749 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-16 10:53:32 --><!-- Compression = gzip -->

