<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bibliomancer.Com</title>
	
	<link>http://bibliomancer.com</link>
	<description>A Modern Life of Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForBibliomancercom" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforbibliomancercom" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on A Bucket of Books by Carl Cravens</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=87&amp;cpage=1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Cravens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=87#comment-33</guid>
		<description>A spot-on analysis.  I think the interesting thing is that digital delivery is highlighting something about the "buckets" that has always been there, but really hasn't been so clear to the buying public...  the cost difference between the hardback bucket, the trade paperback bucket, and the mass-market bucket isn't really about the cost of the bucket.  It's about the *timing* of the bucket... the plain truth is that publishers are charging more for early access.  It's not that the water in the bucket is so expensive, but that there are people who are thirsty enough to pay a premium to drink *now*, instead of waiting in line for a year to get a drink.

And they've been able to control this layered cost-of-access because they completely control the supply of the buckets... they decide when it's time to make a mass-market bucket.

The thing I find really funny about that is that the *consumer* doesn't seem to have figured this out until ebooks hit public notice.  Suddenly, they realize that the cost of producing an ebook should be no more than the cost of the mass-market paperback.  The consumer tends to think that the barrier of high-cost book production has been removed... when the cost of book production was never the real issue.

What's also interesting to me is the realization of how much the fiction market *depends* on early adopters paying a premium to have it now, instead of six months or a year from now.  How can they adapt when digital content makes piracy an easy alternative to paying a premium price?

Locking content up in tighter and tighter controls is not the answer.  They've been trying to stop copying with various copy-protection schemes since I bought my Apple IIe back in the mid-1980's.  You think they'd have figured out that in over 25 years of DRM, it doesn't stop copying and just annoys the legitimate customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A spot-on analysis.  I think the interesting thing is that digital delivery is highlighting something about the “buckets” that has always been there, but really hasn’t been so clear to the buying public…  the cost difference between the hardback bucket, the trade paperback bucket, and the mass-market bucket isn’t really about the cost of the bucket.  It’s about the *timing* of the bucket… the plain truth is that publishers are charging more for early access.  It’s not that the water in the bucket is so expensive, but that there are people who are thirsty enough to pay a premium to drink *now*, instead of waiting in line for a year to get a drink.</p>
<p>And they’ve been able to control this layered cost-of-access because they completely control the supply of the buckets… they decide when it’s time to make a mass-market bucket.</p>
<p>The thing I find really funny about that is that the *consumer* doesn’t seem to have figured this out until ebooks hit public notice.  Suddenly, they realize that the cost of producing an ebook should be no more than the cost of the mass-market paperback.  The consumer tends to think that the barrier of high-cost book production has been removed… when the cost of book production was never the real issue.</p>
<p>What’s also interesting to me is the realization of how much the fiction market *depends* on early adopters paying a premium to have it now, instead of six months or a year from now.  How can they adapt when digital content makes piracy an easy alternative to paying a premium price?</p>
<p>Locking content up in tighter and tighter controls is not the answer.  They’ve been trying to stop copying with various copy-protection schemes since I bought my Apple IIe back in the mid-1980’s.  You think they’d have figured out that in over 25 years of DRM, it doesn’t stop copying and just annoys the legitimate customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Bucket of Books by AlanDeSmet</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=87&amp;cpage=1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanDeSmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=87#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I'm reminded of some of the debates between the print cartoonists and web cartoonists.  The gist was roughly:

print cartoonists: Our livelihoods are disappearing! It's impossible to make a living on the internet.

web cartoonists: Sure you can. Many of us do.  You just have to bust your ass and be your own publicist, advertising team, merchandising group, and everything else.

print cartoonists: I just want to draw cartoons and get paid for it!

I'm sympathetic to both sides, but I think the web cartoonists are right.  Like it or not, this is the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m reminded of some of the debates between the print cartoonists and web cartoonists.  The gist was roughly:</p>
<p>print cartoonists: Our livelihoods are disappearing! It’s impossible to make a living on the internet.</p>
<p>web cartoonists: Sure you can. Many of us do.  You just have to bust your ass and be your own publicist, advertising team, merchandising group, and everything else.</p>
<p>print cartoonists: I just want to draw cartoons and get paid for it!</p>
<p>I’m sympathetic to both sides, but I think the web cartoonists are right.  Like it or not, this is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Pleasant Comparison by Notizbuch</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=51&amp;cpage=1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Notizbuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 16:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=51#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I'm also a big fan of Moleskine and prefer the classic more than my Iphone. Its very handy and has the perfekt size for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m also a big fan of Moleskine and prefer the classic more than my Iphone. Its very handy and has the perfekt size for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Buying by Tweets that mention Bibliomancer.Com » Blog Archive » Book Buying -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=83&amp;cpage=1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bibliomancer.Com » Blog Archive » Book Buying -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=83#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fred Hicks. Fred Hicks said: RT @rdonoghue: Dear Book Smellers, this is why I'll buy a printed book. Odor is not on the list. http://bibliomancer.com/?p=83 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fred Hicks. Fred Hicks said: RT @rdonoghue: Dear Book Smellers, this is why I’ll buy a printed book. Odor is not on the list. <a href="http://bibliomancer.com/?p=83" rel="nofollow">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=83</a> […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Microsoft Store by zenith</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=65&amp;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>zenith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=65#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I see this venture as a gigantic flop whose only point is to show people how "awesome" Vista or Windows 7 is in the face of some small rumblings of competition.  Software drives sales of operating systems, not the other way around.   If the software isn't fantastic then there's no point to upgrade to a newer, hotter, more awesome operating system.

It's the same way with the consoles.  One buys an Xbox360 to play Orange Box.  One does not get Orange Box to facilitate an Xbox360.  You say, "Gee, I would like to play Portal" and you get yourself a system.  Portal sells Xboxes, the Xbox does not sell portal.

I dunno.  Microsoft's products are substandard where they are a virtual monopoly but pretty good where they have healthy competition (hardware accessories, games).  This seems like a petulant pout at the Apple Store on Microsoft's part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this venture as a gigantic flop whose only point is to show people how “awesome” Vista or Windows 7 is in the face of some small rumblings of competition.  Software drives sales of operating systems, not the other way around.   If the software isn’t fantastic then there’s no point to upgrade to a newer, hotter, more awesome operating system.</p>
<p>It’s the same way with the consoles.  One buys an Xbox360 to play Orange Box.  One does not get Orange Box to facilitate an Xbox360.  You say, “Gee, I would like to play Portal” and you get yourself a system.  Portal sells Xboxes, the Xbox does not sell portal.</p>
<p>I dunno.  Microsoft’s products are substandard where they are a virtual monopoly but pretty good where they have healthy competition (hardware accessories, games).  This seems like a petulant pout at the Apple Store on Microsoft’s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better by rdonoghue</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=39&amp;cpage=1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>rdonoghue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=39#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Glad you could make it! And of course, you're welcome to borrow my copy if you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you could make it! And of course, you’re welcome to borrow my copy if you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better by prosaicparadise</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=39&amp;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>prosaicparadise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=39#comment-23</guid>
		<description>It took forever, but I finally logged into this thing. OK! 

So all I wanted to say was I definitely have to read this book. 

-Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took forever, but I finally logged into this thing. OK! </p>
<p>So all I wanted to say was I definitely have to read this book. </p>
<p>–Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Reasons to use Twitter by rdonoghue</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=28&amp;cpage=1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>rdonoghue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=28#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Excellent point.  The power of the network of people who can actually answer your questions should never be underestimated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point.  The power of the network of people who can actually answer your questions should never be underestimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Reasons to use Twitter by Linnaeus</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=28&amp;cpage=1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Linnaeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=28#comment-21</guid>
		<description>One other, minor, use is asking questions that are hard to Google the answers for for one reason or another. If you have a diversified (and friendly) network, you can find some pretty esoteric answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other, minor, use is asking questions that are hard to Google the answers for for one reason or another. If you have a diversified (and friendly) network, you can find some pretty esoteric answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lunch Express by Cleopatra001</title>
		<link>http://bibliomancer.com/?p=18&amp;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleopatra001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliomancer.com/?p=18#comment-20</guid>
		<description>She wrote a book called How To Eat that was amazing. I read it cover to cover like a novel and then started on making the food. Her other book on summer cooking (I can't recall the name right now) was a lovely little book, but How To Eat is the masterpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She wrote a book called How To Eat that was amazing. I read it cover to cover like a novel and then started on making the food. Her other book on summer cooking (I can’t recall the name right now) was a lovely little book, but How To Eat is the masterpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
