<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OpenSource Connections</title>
	
	<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com</link>
	<description>Automating the Science to Enable the Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:53:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForBloggingOSC" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Better iTunes song deduping by qq</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/comment-page-2/#comment-14273</link>
		<dc:creator>qq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/#comment-14273</guid>
		<description>doesnt work for itunes9. nothing is listed in the dupes-playlist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesnt work for itunes9. nothing is listed in the dupes-playlist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better iTunes song deduping by HELP!</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/comment-page-2/#comment-14265</link>
		<dc:creator>HELP!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/#comment-14265</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I've run the script, it puts the dupes in the playlist, and I click remove.

But every time I re-run the script, it finds the same dupes, and every time I delete them, it only deletes them from the playlist, even if I hit CTRL.

What am I doing wrong? Help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I&#8217;ve run the script, it puts the dupes in the playlist, and I click remove.</p>
<p>But every time I re-run the script, it finds the same dupes, and every time I delete them, it only deletes them from the playlist, even if I hit CTRL.</p>
<p>What am I doing wrong? Help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenSource Connections Announces Matching Donation For American Freedom Foundation by OpenSource Connections Announces Matching Donation For American Freedom Foundation | Social Media Club Charlottesville</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/10/20/opensource-connections-announces-matching-donation-for-american-freedom-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-14246</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenSource Connections Announces Matching Donation For American Freedom Foundation | Social Media Club Charlottesville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=465#comment-14246</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenSource Connections is donating $1 to the cause for every new Facebook fan of the American Freedom Foundation up to 500 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenSource Connections is donating $1 to the cause for every new Facebook fan of the American Freedom Foundation up to 500 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drupal Webforms – Controlling the Submit Button by joe vallender</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/02/13/drupal-webforms-controlling-the-submit-button/comment-page-1/#comment-14215</link>
		<dc:creator>joe vallender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=396#comment-14215</guid>
		<description>i have to agree with Michael Herndon. do NOT enter a blank space in the admin

i also think using overflow:hidden is a good idea here too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to agree with Michael Herndon. do NOT enter a blank space in the admin</p>
<p>i also think using overflow:hidden is a good idea here too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Css Fury : Part 1, The * (star/asterisk) Selector by Juan C Rois</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/02/10/css-fury-part-1-the-starasterisk-selector/comment-page-1/#comment-14214</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan C Rois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/02/10/css-fury-part-1-the-starasterisk-selector/#comment-14214</guid>
		<description>Learned something new, Thank you very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learned something new, Thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons the Marines Shouldn’t Ban Social Networking by Jason Hull</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/08/04/5-reasons-the-marines-shouldnt-ban-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-14210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Hull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=452#comment-14210</guid>
		<description>@Devil's Advocate: Thanks for writing out such a thoughtful reply.

To address #1 (and by inference #2), I can see the reasoning behind your point.  Still, the computers should be secure enough to prevent the app issues that you reference.  To me, it's a hammer hitting a fly in response, and I'd think that the military would be a little more fluent in the measured response department.  Still, I'm willing to cede that one (those two?) because I really think that the bigger issue is still trust (3-5).

I think that your response reflects a lack of time walking the lines, in a motor pool, what have you.  Ever seen a soldier take a smoke break?  These kids are working their butts off trying to protect us.  I expected my soldiers to get the job done, whatever that job was, and my job was not to micromanage them along the way.  If we had NCOs always on soldiers' backs telling them to work, efficiency would suffer a heck of a lot worse than what you're implying.  I don't think that your argument for 3-5 addresses what I read as the implication for the ban.  Your argument addresses the idea that Marines should be at work when they're at work and at home when they're at home--a separate thread in my mind since we were always "on call" unless we were on leave--and my argument is that this ruling implies that the Marine Corps is telling their Marines that there's no trust.

With regard to the collaborative environment, do you really think that the Marine Corps is fostering one with this ruling?

It seems that we both want the same outcome - a military that effectively defends our interests and don't agree in how to get there, so thank you for your comments and thoughtfulness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Devil&#8217;s Advocate: Thanks for writing out such a thoughtful reply.</p>
<p>To address #1 (and by inference #2), I can see the reasoning behind your point.  Still, the computers should be secure enough to prevent the app issues that you reference.  To me, it&#8217;s a hammer hitting a fly in response, and I&#8217;d think that the military would be a little more fluent in the measured response department.  Still, I&#8217;m willing to cede that one (those two?) because I really think that the bigger issue is still trust (3-5).</p>
<p>I think that your response reflects a lack of time walking the lines, in a motor pool, what have you.  Ever seen a soldier take a smoke break?  These kids are working their butts off trying to protect us.  I expected my soldiers to get the job done, whatever that job was, and my job was not to micromanage them along the way.  If we had NCOs always on soldiers&#8217; backs telling them to work, efficiency would suffer a heck of a lot worse than what you&#8217;re implying.  I don&#8217;t think that your argument for 3-5 addresses what I read as the implication for the ban.  Your argument addresses the idea that Marines should be at work when they&#8217;re at work and at home when they&#8217;re at home&#8211;a separate thread in my mind since we were always &#8220;on call&#8221; unless we were on leave&#8211;and my argument is that this ruling implies that the Marine Corps is telling their Marines that there&#8217;s no trust.</p>
<p>With regard to the collaborative environment, do you really think that the Marine Corps is fostering one with this ruling?</p>
<p>It seems that we both want the same outcome &#8211; a military that effectively defends our interests and don&#8217;t agree in how to get there, so thank you for your comments and thoughtfulness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons the Marines Shouldn’t Ban Social Networking by Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/08/04/5-reasons-the-marines-shouldnt-ban-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-14207</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=452#comment-14207</guid>
		<description>Ok, here are a few things you either didn't know, misunderstood, or misrepresented (which it was or if it was a combination of the above or other factors isn't really important).  I will discuss each of your points consecutively. 

1)You say the security risks won't go away, and that they will remain just as large, and possibly be less monitored because it's not at work.  

There are a couple issues with this:  The primary security threat is that many social networking sites are security risks to a computer (and its network's) data.  Whether by adding an app to your profile (apps can see a lot about your profile and computer, and can easily be written to outwardly do one thing, while at the same time attacking your network for information theft or viral attack).  The other issue (which also is a flaw in some of your later points) is that the marines aren't trying to stop service members from personally divulging military secrets through these sites (intentionally or accidentally).  They don't care what the marines are posting really, that's not the issue.  They don't want want their computers accessing such insecure sites.  Use of these sites at home won't be through military networks or on military computers, which is why they only applied their ban to military computers.  

2)The main issue with your "we don't trust you" complaint is the same as the latter above.  They're not worried about what the service members are posting, they're worried about the cybersecurity of their military networks.  The ban and issue has absolutely nothing to do with trust.  Period.

3)Yeah... still the issue that they've done nothing about blocking personal use of social networking sites at home or on personal computers and networks.  This ban is pretty similar to the ban that most employers have on the ability to play online games while at work.  Online games can be created and run by anyone, which can be a security risk to the company, and also it's a complete waste of their employee's time.  Why should a marine be allowed to mess around on facebook while he's supposed to be working?  It's a waste of the military's time and resources, and efficiency is a really big deal at all works, and in the military especially.  What the individual marines do on their personal time is no bother of the Marine Corps.  

4)This argument is an utter fallacy.  It has nothing to do at all with what the ban entails.  The ban prevents personal use of such sites.  It's not like the Marine Corps has decided that they'll not use any social networking sites or other internet means to advertise or promote the service or such.  There are still official Marine Corps pages on those sites.  Their management is carefully controlled and not done through the same military networks for which strict security is a concern.  

5)This is even worse than the 4th point.  You're suggesting that the use of facebook and twitter somehow is a means of creative collaboration through which technical and tactical innovation will occur?  That's absurd.  There is an enormous difference between innovation in social networking and self expression and innovation which is militarily significant.  Letting marines cruise around on facebook, commenting on funny pictures of their friends while at work will not help the US defeat terrorism, as nice as that would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here are a few things you either didn&#8217;t know, misunderstood, or misrepresented (which it was or if it was a combination of the above or other factors isn&#8217;t really important).  I will discuss each of your points consecutively. </p>
<p>1)You say the security risks won&#8217;t go away, and that they will remain just as large, and possibly be less monitored because it&#8217;s not at work.  </p>
<p>There are a couple issues with this:  The primary security threat is that many social networking sites are security risks to a computer (and its network&#8217;s) data.  Whether by adding an app to your profile (apps can see a lot about your profile and computer, and can easily be written to outwardly do one thing, while at the same time attacking your network for information theft or viral attack).  The other issue (which also is a flaw in some of your later points) is that the marines aren&#8217;t trying to stop service members from personally divulging military secrets through these sites (intentionally or accidentally).  They don&#8217;t care what the marines are posting really, that&#8217;s not the issue.  They don&#8217;t want want their computers accessing such insecure sites.  Use of these sites at home won&#8217;t be through military networks or on military computers, which is why they only applied their ban to military computers.  </p>
<p>2)The main issue with your &#8220;we don&#8217;t trust you&#8221; complaint is the same as the latter above.  They&#8217;re not worried about what the service members are posting, they&#8217;re worried about the cybersecurity of their military networks.  The ban and issue has absolutely nothing to do with trust.  Period.</p>
<p>3)Yeah&#8230; still the issue that they&#8217;ve done nothing about blocking personal use of social networking sites at home or on personal computers and networks.  This ban is pretty similar to the ban that most employers have on the ability to play online games while at work.  Online games can be created and run by anyone, which can be a security risk to the company, and also it&#8217;s a complete waste of their employee&#8217;s time.  Why should a marine be allowed to mess around on facebook while he&#8217;s supposed to be working?  It&#8217;s a waste of the military&#8217;s time and resources, and efficiency is a really big deal at all works, and in the military especially.  What the individual marines do on their personal time is no bother of the Marine Corps.  </p>
<p>4)This argument is an utter fallacy.  It has nothing to do at all with what the ban entails.  The ban prevents personal use of such sites.  It&#8217;s not like the Marine Corps has decided that they&#8217;ll not use any social networking sites or other internet means to advertise or promote the service or such.  There are still official Marine Corps pages on those sites.  Their management is carefully controlled and not done through the same military networks for which strict security is a concern.  </p>
<p>5)This is even worse than the 4th point.  You&#8217;re suggesting that the use of facebook and twitter somehow is a means of creative collaboration through which technical and tactical innovation will occur?  That&#8217;s absurd.  There is an enormous difference between innovation in social networking and self expression and innovation which is militarily significant.  Letting marines cruise around on facebook, commenting on funny pictures of their friends while at work will not help the US defeat terrorism, as nice as that would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Will, Coffee, Help Desks and Software. by Eric Pugh</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/10/09/good-will-coffee-help-desks-and-software./comment-page-1/#comment-14205</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=462#comment-14205</guid>
		<description>I have to fess up, I was "Brutus" in this story.  I knew Michael would solve an obscure Windows related installation issue of a credit card processing software that he had never seen before in under 5 minutes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to fess up, I was &#8220;Brutus&#8221; in this story.  I knew Michael would solve an obscure Windows related installation issue of a credit card processing software that he had never seen before in under 5 minutes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arin Sime speaking at Agile 2009 by Custom Software</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/05/01/arin-sime-speaking-at-agile-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14204</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=425#comment-14204</guid>
		<description>I don't have any agile war stories! My experience with agile has all been positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any agile war stories! My experience with agile has all been positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EdUI 2009 Conference Workshops Recap by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/09/24/edui-2009-conference-workshops-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-14197</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=458#comment-14197</guid>
		<description>Great article. thanks for those talking points from David Poteet's talk. some good ideas on writing better text in there

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. thanks for those talking points from David Poteet&#8217;s talk. some good ideas on writing better text in there</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Older Version of a Language Using MacPorts by Eric Pugh</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2009/10/01/installing-older-version-of-a-language-using-macports/comment-page-1/#comment-14195</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/?p=459#comment-14195</guid>
		<description>I have struggled with teh whole activation aspect to different versions of port, like having MySQL 5 and 6...   Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have struggled with teh whole activation aspect to different versions of port, like having MySQL 5 and 6&#8230;   Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better iTunes song deduping by guideaux</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/comment-page-2/#comment-14194</link>
		<dc:creator>guideaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/#comment-14194</guid>
		<description>hi there, thnx for the script. question: the script runs, but says " no duplicates found"  whilst my " show doubles" in itunes shows about 2000 songs??

i just installed snow leopard and have all the last updates.

somebody knows why the script cant find anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, thnx for the script. question: the script runs, but says &#8221; no duplicates found&#8221;  whilst my &#8221; show doubles&#8221; in itunes shows about 2000 songs??</p>
<p>i just installed snow leopard and have all the last updates.</p>
<p>somebody knows why the script cant find anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better iTunes song deduping by cmoslim</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/comment-page-2/#comment-14192</link>
		<dc:creator>cmoslim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2006/11/11/better-itunes-song-deduping/#comment-14192</guid>
		<description>Ran it, deleted all the files, deleted all my music, fortunately I have it backed up in like 4 different places, must not have followed directions :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran it, deleted all the files, deleted all my music, fortunately I have it backed up in like 4 different places, must not have followed directions :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Experience Upgrading Windows Vista to Service Pack 1 by Ann Printer</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/03/20/my-experience-upgrading-windows-vista-to-service-pack-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Printer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/03/20/my-experience-upgrading-windows-vista-to-service-pack-1/#comment-14188</guid>
		<description>I like it.
Thought along those lines when I did a backup recently.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.<br />
Thought along those lines when I did a backup recently.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Experience Upgrading Windows Vista to Service Pack 1 by Ann Printer</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/03/20/my-experience-upgrading-windows-vista-to-service-pack-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14187</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Printer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/03/20/my-experience-upgrading-windows-vista-to-service-pack-1/#comment-14187</guid>
		<description>I found your blog doing a web search today 9/17. 
I think I better share this on my blog. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your blog doing a web search today 9/17.<br />
I think I better share this on my blog. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Source vs. Proprietary Software in the Federal Government by software application development</title>
		<link>http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/02/04/open-source-vs-proprietary-software-in-the-federal-government/comment-page-1/#comment-14186</link>
		<dc:creator>software application development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2008/02/04/open-source-vs-proprietary-software-in-the-federal-government/#comment-14186</guid>
		<description>Very interesting experiment. Yeah it is a well known long battle between open source and another software. I personally distribute the commercial software but I don't see any problems in open source. I don't think that they are "taking my piece of cake". So I will be keeping eye on your interesting blog and.. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting experiment. Yeah it is a well known long battle between open source and another software. I personally distribute the commercial software but I don&#8217;t see any problems in open source. I don&#8217;t think that they are &#8220;taking my piece of cake&#8221;. So I will be keeping eye on your interesting blog and.. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
