<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cephyn</title>
	<link>http://cephyn.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForCephyn" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Comment on The Liberal Mandate by cephyn</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/06/the-liberal-mandate/#comment-3666</link>
		<author>cephyn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/06/the-liberal-mandate/#comment-3666</guid>
		<description>Disappointed is an acceptable reaction to your party/ideology's loss. But frightened - that takes much more.

Every time people "vote their pocketbooks" - a Democrat wins. Why is that? Why, given that the Republicans always claim to have the better economic policies, are the Democrats the ones that usually get the economy moving? Why do the Democrats so often benefit from poor economies?

You assume, had the economy been better, that McCain would have won. I don't necessarily believe that - not with Palin as his pick, not with the way he ran the campaign. If he runs more like he did in 2000, with a strong economic-minded VP, then I think he wins. But given how he played it - I doubt he would have won.

You can't act as if the economic meltdown happened in a vacuum. In 2000 the R's claimed they would have the majority forever. It lasted less than one term. They claimed they had all the solutions, they had full control of the government - and things fell apart all around them anyway. I had to bite my tongue because it was necessary to see if they were right, if they really did have the answers and that the country really was shifting definitively right of center.

That, clearly, is not what happened. So lets see what the Dems do with the keys now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointed is an acceptable reaction to your party/ideology&#8217;s loss. But frightened - that takes much more.</p>
<p>Every time people &#8220;vote their pocketbooks&#8221; - a Democrat wins. Why is that? Why, given that the Republicans always claim to have the better economic policies, are the Democrats the ones that usually get the economy moving? Why do the Democrats so often benefit from poor economies?</p>
<p>You assume, had the economy been better, that McCain would have won. I don&#8217;t necessarily believe that - not with Palin as his pick, not with the way he ran the campaign. If he runs more like he did in 2000, with a strong economic-minded VP, then I think he wins. But given how he played it - I doubt he would have won.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t act as if the economic meltdown happened in a vacuum. In 2000 the R&#8217;s claimed they would have the majority forever. It lasted less than one term. They claimed they had all the solutions, they had full control of the government - and things fell apart all around them anyway. I had to bite my tongue because it was necessary to see if they were right, if they really did have the answers and that the country really was shifting definitively right of center.</p>
<p>That, clearly, is not what happened. So lets see what the Dems do with the keys now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Liberal Mandate by Mike</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/06/the-liberal-mandate/#comment-3665</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/06/the-liberal-mandate/#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>For what it's worth, I answered "disappointed" rather than "scared" for my polling group when they asked how I'd react to an election of Obama.  It's going to take a little longer than I think they were referring for Democrats and the Obama administration to give ruining this country their best shot.

People voted their pocketbooks and Obama was given his mandate because of economics.  One reason that Obama was elected, according to the polls, was economics.  If the timing had been off you would have still had to bite your tongue, as you apparently have been doing for the past two terms.  How long would you have to be biting your tongue for what you want to say not to be true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I answered &#8220;disappointed&#8221; rather than &#8220;scared&#8221; for my polling group when they asked how I&#8217;d react to an election of Obama.  It&#8217;s going to take a little longer than I think they were referring for Democrats and the Obama administration to give ruining this country their best shot.</p>
<p>People voted their pocketbooks and Obama was given his mandate because of economics.  One reason that Obama was elected, according to the polls, was economics.  If the timing had been off you would have still had to bite your tongue, as you apparently have been doing for the past two terms.  How long would you have to be biting your tongue for what you want to say not to be true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 General Election Endorsements by jennifer juniper</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3659</link>
		<author>jennifer juniper</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>kevin,

i basically voted the same as you with exceptions on 11 and 1a.  we will see how it all turned out.  i spent forever reading all the propositions last night and flip flopped on a few of them!

so we have a new president! president obama will be inaugurated in 75 days!  woo hoo!

jennifer juniper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevin,</p>
<p>i basically voted the same as you with exceptions on 11 and 1a.  we will see how it all turned out.  i spent forever reading all the propositions last night and flip flopped on a few of them!</p>
<p>so we have a new president! president obama will be inaugurated in 75 days!  woo hoo!</p>
<p>jennifer juniper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 General Election Endorsements by rich</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3657</link>
		<author>rich</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>I think you know who I voted for in the presidential election =)

Some of the props were tough this time around.  I had a hard time deciding how to vote on Prop 1a.  I think we really need to improve our transportation infrastructure, and a 2hr 40min trip to SF would be really cool.  Ultimately, though, I'd rather that money be spent on intracity transportation systems.  Traveling to SF isn't a very common trip for me (and for most people), but I fight with freeway traffic *every day*.  So in the end I voted no.

I agree with you on the prison related props.  We can't just lock people up and think we can forget about them.  Most of the people in prison are going to get out at some point and we need to rehabilitate them so they don't end up right back inside.  We also don't need to be throwing small time non-violent offenders in prison where they turn into worse criminals.

Prop 11 was another tough one.  You know I hate gerrymandering as much as you do.  I agree that an algorithmic approach would be ideal, but people just aren't going to trust computers for this so it's never going to happen.  The prop definitely has its flaws, but I think that it is at least somewhat better than the current system, so I voted for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you know who I voted for in the presidential election =)</p>
<p>Some of the props were tough this time around.  I had a hard time deciding how to vote on Prop 1a.  I think we really need to improve our transportation infrastructure, and a 2hr 40min trip to SF would be really cool.  Ultimately, though, I&#8217;d rather that money be spent on intracity transportation systems.  Traveling to SF isn&#8217;t a very common trip for me (and for most people), but I fight with freeway traffic *every day*.  So in the end I voted no.</p>
<p>I agree with you on the prison related props.  We can&#8217;t just lock people up and think we can forget about them.  Most of the people in prison are going to get out at some point and we need to rehabilitate them so they don&#8217;t end up right back inside.  We also don&#8217;t need to be throwing small time non-violent offenders in prison where they turn into worse criminals.</p>
<p>Prop 11 was another tough one.  You know I hate gerrymandering as much as you do.  I agree that an algorithmic approach would be ideal, but people just aren&#8217;t going to trust computers for this so it&#8217;s never going to happen.  The prop definitely has its flaws, but I think that it is at least somewhat better than the current system, so I voted for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 General Election Endorsements by F. COURTNEY  NORMAN</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3656</link>
		<author>F. COURTNEY  NORMAN</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/11/03/2008-general-election-endorsements/#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU- I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT I WOULD HAVE DONE WITHOUT YOUR SUGGESTIONS- SO WELL THOUGHT OUT!!!! THANK YOU THANK YOU  ....!!! COURTNEY NORMAN- VENICE RESIDENT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU- I JUST DON&#8217;T KNOW WHAT I WOULD HAVE DONE WITHOUT YOUR SUGGESTIONS- SO WELL THOUGHT OUT!!!! THANK YOU THANK YOU  &#8230;.!!! COURTNEY NORMAN- VENICE RESIDENT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not My President by jennifer juniper</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/10/29/not-my-president/#comment-3645</link>
		<author>jennifer juniper</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/10/29/not-my-president/#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>i just talked to my brother on the phone and he has been in the middle of podunk pennsylvania for the last year. he got into a heated discussion with one of these anti-obama people and when my brother asked him what this guy was going to do about it if obama became president, the guy balked.  another pharmacist at his hospital started his comment with "i am not a racist but, if that n****r is elected i am going to leave the country!"  

my brother says he has not seen such outright racism in his life.  

jennifer juniper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just talked to my brother on the phone and he has been in the middle of podunk pennsylvania for the last year. he got into a heated discussion with one of these anti-obama people and when my brother asked him what this guy was going to do about it if obama became president, the guy balked.  another pharmacist at his hospital started his comment with &#8220;i am not a racist but, if that n****r is elected i am going to leave the country!&#8221;  </p>
<p>my brother says he has not seen such outright racism in his life.  </p>
<p>jennifer juniper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simply Human. by jennifer juniper</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/09/02/simply-human/#comment-3264</link>
		<author>jennifer juniper</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/09/02/simply-human/#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>she is getting a lot of publicity now.  i had never heard of her before the nomination.  i just think the republicans have dug their own grave!  i don't see how mccain can win now unless obama really fucks up the next two months!

jennifer juniper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she is getting a lot of publicity now.  i had never heard of her before the nomination.  i just think the republicans have dug their own grave!  i don&#8217;t see how mccain can win now unless obama really fucks up the next two months!</p>
<p>jennifer juniper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LPGA: Ladies PolyGlot Association? by LPGA Comes to its Senses | cephyn</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/27/lpga-ladies-polyglot-association/#comment-3143</link>
		<author>LPGA Comes to its Senses | cephyn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/27/lpga-ladies-polyglot-association/#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier, I talked about the LPGA policy to suspend players that could not pass an English proficiency exam. Well, it took them about a week, but the LPGA has decided to rethink the policy. I should hope so. They buckled under both criticism from media and players, but it seems that what finally did them in was criticism from sponsors. Not a big surprise that they go where the sponsors say, but at least they took the right stand. For example: One of the tour’s title sponsors, State Farm, already weighed in this week by saying it was “dumbfounded.” “We don’t understand this and we don’t know why they have done it,” State Farm spokesman Kip Diggs told Advertising Age on its Web site. “And we have strongly encouraged them to take another look at this.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Earlier, I talked about the LPGA policy to suspend players that could not pass an English proficiency exam. Well, it took them about a week, but the LPGA has decided to rethink the policy. I should hope so. They buckled under both criticism from media and players, but it seems that what finally did them in was criticism from sponsors. Not a big surprise that they go where the sponsors say, but at least they took the right stand. For example: One of the tour&#8217;s title sponsors, State Farm, already weighed in this week by saying it was &#8220;dumbfounded.&#8221; &#8220;We don&#8217;t understand this and we don&#8217;t know why they have done it,&#8221; State Farm spokesman Kip Diggs told Advertising Age on its Web site. &#8220;And we have strongly encouraged them to take another look at this.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simply Human. by skick</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/09/02/simply-human/#comment-3062</link>
		<author>skick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/09/02/simply-human/#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Here Here!

I just can not believe that knowing her 17 year old daughter was pregnant, and knowing what scrutiny and media attention that would bring upon her daughter AND her first grand-child, she decided to put her political career first.

Seriously disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here Here!</p>
<p>I just can not believe that knowing her 17 year old daughter was pregnant, and knowing what scrutiny and media attention that would bring upon her daughter AND her first grand-child, she decided to put her political career first.</p>
<p>Seriously disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin - Good Choice? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2783</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>Oh I see, the article had your quote.  I wondered why you were providing an article listing her favorables off from the top.  Admittedly Alaska as battleground == not so good.  When I first heard about Palin I figured he'd pick someone with more pieces on the Risk board like the Huckster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I see, the article had your quote.  I wondered why you were providing an article listing her favorables off from the top.  Admittedly Alaska as battleground == not so good.  When I first heard about Palin I figured he&#8217;d pick someone with more pieces on the Risk board like the Huckster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
