Comments for Chicago Title Insurance

Comment on Loan Officers Abscond With Broker Fees by Jd

Jd — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:46:19 +0000

For what reason would there be several say 7 to 9 sets of HUD 1 Settlement Statements, forged signatures varying slightly to more significant amounts some close in amount, not executed with borrower? The lot spanning a period of 6 or 7 weeks? Not making homeowner aware? Wouldn’t any changes need to be made by a borrower signature? What does this mean to the home mortgage? and to the title? or the contract itself?

also… Why would the agent say they will add the homeowners insurance and just never add it? Never explaining?

And… why would they charge thousands 3000 in escrow but it not be applied to mortgage?

why would the title pay more than the borrower believe the loan is for.

Or add $30000 to a Settlement doc? after the fact

Comment on SIGNING vs. FUNDING vs. CLOSING by Sagar

Sagar — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:01:50 +0000

Weeeee, what a quick and easy soluiton.

Comment on Chicago Title’s Builder Forecast Forum 2011 by Elden Gateley

Elden Gateley — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:15:20 +0000

I really must state it’s quite pleasing to arrive at a rather original blog like yours, excellent effort. I expect I’ll be coming back fairly often, will you be making more posts?

Comment on Chicago Title’s Builder Forecast Forum 2011 by Elias Gonzolez

Elias Gonzolez — Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:07:50 +0000

In case you are like plenty of people today you could merely neglect this. Don’t give up your morals for something. Usually this may lead to a mistaken and unproductive existence.

Comment on Cut Expenses by using Google Apps by quick payday loans

quick payday loans — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:16:00 +0000

thanks !! very helpful post!

Comment on Short Sale vs. Foreclosure by Kaye Melli

Kaye Melli — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:13:30 +0000

Beware of the short sale! Some lenders will pursue homeowners for the deficiency balance.

Comment on Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project by Perry Joynt

Perry Joynt — Thu, 20 May 2010 22:50:37 +0000

Really enjoyed this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

Comment on Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project by Kyle Ryan

Kyle Ryan — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:37:37 +0000

Kelli,

First of all, you are a goddess for, among other reasons, keeping an ear to the ground on issues affecting the local Real Estate Market and related industries. Second, you’re a goddess, just because. Personally, I think that Seattle is going to be playing catch-up for many years to come in the areas of mass transit and infrastructure. While I know that even a slight disruption in the available routes has a big effect on all commerce, I support the cost and inconvenience associated with any plan that puts roads, trains, and transmission lines underground.

Thank you for keeping a close eye on the details!

Kyle Ryan

Comment on Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project by Brian Fairchild

Brian Fairchild — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:20:25 +0000

Kelli, This is a good explanation of what has been happening with the viaduct replacement. It is true that the access to downtown from the tunnel is restricted (no Senaca exit). The idea is to move traffic through Seattle with limited access to keep costs lower. Convenience is not the highest priority. The alternatives such as placing the viaduct traffic on surface streets seems unworkable since we are talking a lot of gridlock. Moving that traffic to I-5 doesn’t make sense considering the congestion on I-5.
Brian

Comment on Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project by Jonathan French

Jonathan French — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:00:34 +0000

Kelli,

You are always so informative! What would we do without you!

Jonathan