<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Hot Wires	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotwires.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotwires.net</link>
	<description>musings by the electronics design, fabrication and assembly industry&#039;s best minds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
			<item>
				<title>
				Comment on Coronavirus: Curse, or Blessing in Disguise? by Gene Weiner				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/coronavirus-curse-or-blessing-in-disguise/comment-page-1/#comment-126869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene Weiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5592#comment-126869</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[my college major was initially epidemiology

Really? I didn&#039;t know that!

All companies have been told to stay closed post the V=Lunar New Year celebration until at least February 9.

The March 16-18 CPCA/HKPCA event has been postponed.

I expect the March SEMICON CHINA (Shanghai event to also announce a  &quot;delay&quot;.

This will be a boon for the Taiwan, Vietnam, Thai, Mexican and AMERICAN members in our business that have managed to scramble and cover their near term supply chains.

Loner viewpoint is cloudy but should be good for the U.S. if investors take a longer viewpoint, especially if Washington takes a strong suppoiortive role (a pipedream?)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my college major was initially epidemiology</p>
<p>Really? I didn&#8217;t know that!</p>
<p>All companies have been told to stay closed post the V=Lunar New Year celebration until at least February 9.</p>
<p>The March 16-18 CPCA/HKPCA event has been postponed.</p>
<p>I expect the March SEMICON CHINA (Shanghai event to also announce a  &#8220;delay&#8221;.</p>
<p>This will be a boon for the Taiwan, Vietnam, Thai, Mexican and AMERICAN members in our business that have managed to scramble and cover their near term supply chains.</p>
<p>Loner viewpoint is cloudy but should be good for the U.S. if investors take a longer viewpoint, especially if Washington takes a strong suppoiortive role (a pipedream?)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on &#8216;Huawei&#8217; E.O. Portends Total Supply Chain Chaos by Ronald Linde				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/huawei-e-o-portends-total-supply-chain-chaos/comment-page-1/#comment-123629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Linde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5475#comment-123629</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Good day to all. 
Well.. this should not have come as a complete shock....  Here are some truisms that have been overlooked for way too long.

Other than specialty materials the US has NOT one laminate manufacture. 
The last domestic laminate Norplex Oak / G.E.  abandoned the US in favor of profits from Asia. 
 
There is not ONE domestic manufacture of Inks and resists for PCBs.  All inks have been purchased and distributed by Di Nippon Ink and Chemicals.  This includes Taiyo and Sun.  All resins are manufactured in several Asian Counties. This is due to costs and profits. 

Other than a hand full of chemical companies there is a limited source for Electronic Grade  Chemistry.

It is not surprising that ALL of our top PCB manufactures have been purchased by Asian Companies. There was a promise that they would not close facilities after purchase. We are facing a growing strangulation of legitimate PCB  .  facilities.

I blame some of this on buyers that continue to source off shore without giving a bid to domestic manufactures.   We need to circle our wagons and give the proper respect to the true heroes of our industry.  The owners of our FEW PCB manufactures.  Please remember that in the 80s there were over 5000 pcb shops in N. America.  The current number  of active shops is less the 500 and of the 500 several are brokers and have no manufacturing facilities in N. America. Buyers purchase from a Web Site.  

The fact is that while India has done a great job building several major PCB facilities they cannot compete with the Asian Pricing Schedules.  

I am of the opinion that it would take BILLIONS of dollars and many years to resurrect our industry.  We lost our industry due to greed and crooked dealings.  We cannot rely on our Government to assist in our crisis.  There are many calls to congress and officials in high placed arenas to look into our industry demise.  It is like whistling in the wind.

Thank you all for letting me vent my frustrations ..Please use this note as a reminder that WE can compete in the US.  Lets keep our industry strong and vital.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day to all.<br />
Well.. this should not have come as a complete shock&#8230;.  Here are some truisms that have been overlooked for way too long.</p>
<p>Other than specialty materials the US has NOT one laminate manufacture.<br />
The last domestic laminate Norplex Oak / G.E.  abandoned the US in favor of profits from Asia. </p>
<p>There is not ONE domestic manufacture of Inks and resists for PCBs.  All inks have been purchased and distributed by Di Nippon Ink and Chemicals.  This includes Taiyo and Sun.  All resins are manufactured in several Asian Counties. This is due to costs and profits. </p>
<p>Other than a hand full of chemical companies there is a limited source for Electronic Grade  Chemistry.</p>
<p>It is not surprising that ALL of our top PCB manufactures have been purchased by Asian Companies. There was a promise that they would not close facilities after purchase. We are facing a growing strangulation of legitimate PCB  .  facilities.</p>
<p>I blame some of this on buyers that continue to source off shore without giving a bid to domestic manufactures.   We need to circle our wagons and give the proper respect to the true heroes of our industry.  The owners of our FEW PCB manufactures.  Please remember that in the 80s there were over 5000 pcb shops in N. America.  The current number  of active shops is less the 500 and of the 500 several are brokers and have no manufacturing facilities in N. America. Buyers purchase from a Web Site.  </p>
<p>The fact is that while India has done a great job building several major PCB facilities they cannot compete with the Asian Pricing Schedules.  </p>
<p>I am of the opinion that it would take BILLIONS of dollars and many years to resurrect our industry.  We lost our industry due to greed and crooked dealings.  We cannot rely on our Government to assist in our crisis.  There are many calls to congress and officials in high placed arenas to look into our industry demise.  It is like whistling in the wind.</p>
<p>Thank you all for letting me vent my frustrations ..Please use this note as a reminder that WE can compete in the US.  Lets keep our industry strong and vital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on &#8216;Huawei&#8217; E.O. Portends Total Supply Chain Chaos by Richard H Kincaid				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/huawei-e-o-portends-total-supply-chain-chaos/comment-page-1/#comment-123496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard H Kincaid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5475#comment-123496</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Mike 
Great article !   
 My company of 47 years K &#038; F ELECTRONICS  have been saying this to many different  Government officials for a very long time , I seen this happen 2 years after the Twin Towers went down , but what does a now consider under our Government today a small dis-vantage business know.
Not only was I given that name years ago , I&#039;m now consider a Diminishing Business under our Government.  
We are 47 years old today , PLEASE SEND HELP !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
Great article !<br />
 My company of 47 years K &amp; F ELECTRONICS  have been saying this to many different  Government officials for a very long time , I seen this happen 2 years after the Twin Towers went down , but what does a now consider under our Government today a small dis-vantage business know.<br />
Not only was I given that name years ago , I&#8217;m now consider a Diminishing Business under our Government.<br />
We are 47 years old today , PLEASE SEND HELP !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on What&#8217;s In a Brand? In EMS, Apparently Everything by John Borneman				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/whats-in-a-brand-in-ems-apparently-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-117638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Borneman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5180#comment-117638</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Funny. We tangle ourselves up in &quot;relating&quot; to the customer with words and phrases that are often hard to parse. On Celestica&#039;s home pages are the enigmatic words &quot;Welcome to the Acceleration Economy&quot; Huh? But don&#039;t worry. They have whole blog post explaining (and to be fair the explanation does have some good points. 
But to be fair I suppose a simpler tag line like &quot;we make stuff&quot; wouldn&#039;t fly well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny. We tangle ourselves up in &#8220;relating&#8221; to the customer with words and phrases that are often hard to parse. On Celestica&#8217;s home pages are the enigmatic words &#8220;Welcome to the Acceleration Economy&#8221; Huh? But don&#8217;t worry. They have whole blog post explaining (and to be fair the explanation does have some good points.<br />
But to be fair I suppose a simpler tag line like &#8220;we make stuff&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t fly well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on A Question on Schematic Style by Duane Benson				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/a-question-on-schematic-style/comment-page-1/#comment-116445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duane Benson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5146#comment-116445</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I like the clarity of grouping the bypass caps off to the side, but it does seem to cause problems when I go back to a schematic after a while. I&#039;ll probably end up with a hybrid style of some sort.

@Felix - For some reason my CAD software was defaulting to exponential notation for capacitors so a 0.1uf is shown as 1e-07F. I can change them individually, but haven&#039;t yet dug around to see how to change the default notation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the clarity of grouping the bypass caps off to the side, but it does seem to cause problems when I go back to a schematic after a while. I&#8217;ll probably end up with a hybrid style of some sort.</p>
<p>@Felix &#8211; For some reason my CAD software was defaulting to exponential notation for capacitors so a 0.1uf is shown as 1e-07F. I can change them individually, but haven&#8217;t yet dug around to see how to change the default notation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on A Question on Schematic Style by Dave DeFebo				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/a-question-on-schematic-style/comment-page-1/#comment-116179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave DeFebo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 08:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5146#comment-116179</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I follow a convention I developed many years and CAD systems ago.  I have a &quot;chart&quot; which functions sort of like an index of all ICs sorted by reference designator.  There are columns for pin numbers and net names for all powers and grounds.  In the chart are also columns for bypass capacitor reference designators (and their values).  Those columns actually represent real schematic capacitors.  Embedded in the lines of the chart are the pins for the actual capacitor and nets connected to the pins carrying the signal names as mentioned above.  If it is a large schematic (many pages and components), the chart is either on the first or last page.  It&#039;s sort of hard to describe in words, but the chart is very easy to understand.  Unfortunately, some people don&#039;t like it because they can&#039;t see real capacitor symbols.  When a schematic has 100 or more capacitors it can get cluttered real fast.  In that case the chart really clears up a lot of space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow a convention I developed many years and CAD systems ago.  I have a &#8220;chart&#8221; which functions sort of like an index of all ICs sorted by reference designator.  There are columns for pin numbers and net names for all powers and grounds.  In the chart are also columns for bypass capacitor reference designators (and their values).  Those columns actually represent real schematic capacitors.  Embedded in the lines of the chart are the pins for the actual capacitor and nets connected to the pins carrying the signal names as mentioned above.  If it is a large schematic (many pages and components), the chart is either on the first or last page.  It&#8217;s sort of hard to describe in words, but the chart is very easy to understand.  Unfortunately, some people don&#8217;t like it because they can&#8217;t see real capacitor symbols.  When a schematic has 100 or more capacitors it can get cluttered real fast.  In that case the chart really clears up a lot of space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on A Question on Schematic Style by Felix Ullrich				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/a-question-on-schematic-style/comment-page-1/#comment-116150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix Ullrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5146#comment-116150</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I sort of like grouping all of the power connections in one place.  That includes all the bypass caps and the chip connections (this means using two or more symbols per chip).   You can annotate the cap properties as to which chip it is associated in one of its extra property fields, keeping that field as not visible.

Also I like placing pin headers with the headers at the border and the conductors pointing in.  If you slide the chip pins around on the chip, you can connect the header pins directly to the chip and avoid searching for the net labels.  This does mean you do have a multiplicity of  symbols for the same chip in your library.

BTW Farads?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of like grouping all of the power connections in one place.  That includes all the bypass caps and the chip connections (this means using two or more symbols per chip).   You can annotate the cap properties as to which chip it is associated in one of its extra property fields, keeping that field as not visible.</p>
<p>Also I like placing pin headers with the headers at the border and the conductors pointing in.  If you slide the chip pins around on the chip, you can connect the header pins directly to the chip and avoid searching for the net labels.  This does mean you do have a multiplicity of  symbols for the same chip in your library.</p>
<p>BTW Farads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on A Question on Schematic Style by Sandro Guizzardi				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/a-question-on-schematic-style/comment-page-1/#comment-116143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandro Guizzardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 13:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5146#comment-116143</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[As you say, it&#039;s a matter of style, but what happens when you&#039;ll need to check the schematics at a later date?  This is the main reason why I place the components, as similar as logically possible, to the layout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, it&#8217;s a matter of style, but what happens when you&#8217;ll need to check the schematics at a later date?  This is the main reason why I place the components, as similar as logically possible, to the layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on The Bourse Identity by Willy				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/the-bourse-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-113511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5102#comment-113511</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for keeping an eye on Foxconn. CEO and Founder, Terry Gou has hood-winked Trump and the State of Wisconsin with his nonsensical promises. It will amount to nothing. Foxconn&#039;s brutal treatment of their employees is something that I witnessed first hand in Longhua, China. 
Far from being admired, the company is despised in China. Young engineers quickly flee after a year or two to a less harsh environment]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping an eye on Foxconn. CEO and Founder, Terry Gou has hood-winked Trump and the State of Wisconsin with his nonsensical promises. It will amount to nothing. Foxconn&#8217;s brutal treatment of their employees is something that I witnessed first hand in Longhua, China.<br />
Far from being admired, the company is despised in China. Young engineers quickly flee after a year or two to a less harsh environment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				Comment on Intermetallic Growth Rate is Strongly Temperature Dependent by Alexander Pummer				</title>
				<link>http://www.hotwires.net/intermetallic-growth-rate-is-strongly-temperature-dependent/comment-page-1/#comment-112709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Pummer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 01:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotwires.net/?p=5040#comment-112709</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[in general, eutectics are brittle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in general, eutectics are brittle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
