<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Desktop Management Depot</title>
	<link>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com</link>
	<description>A SearchEnterpriseDesktop.com podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Discussing Windows 7 with Mark Minasi by Ray Collazo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/KnkVoFsHdD0/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/12/04/discussing-windows-7-with-mark-minasi/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>Computer buying cycles:
  Big Corporations with Lots of Cash have the ability to buy new hardware every 3 years. Smaller, older businesses do Not: In fact many small businesses are still in the "If it isn't broke, why fix it?" mentality. Our particular facility still has hardware here that is 6 years old (or older in some cases): The older hardware actually has a better ability to run out on the hot factory floor than the newer hardware does (the best we can ever deploy out onto the factory CANNOT be faster than 1.5ghz: It would otherwise crash during the hot summer months).

Hardware support:
  Why not make it that, If its a driver that works with NT4, that it should still work in some way with Windows 7? Linux is wonderful with this in that I've been able to continue using hardware that was designed for Windows 95 in the current day whereas windows doesn't even Want to look at it or even acknowledge its presence In this day of virtualization, there should be SOME way to virtualize a driver instance to where it will still function without stranding the user with a windows-worthless piece of hardware.

Applocker:
  If they can make it to where an administrator can, just before deployment of a machine to a user, go ahead and direct the applocker to "Scan this machine for All the existing executables and ONLY allow the existing detected executables to be run from this point forward", Then Applocker I think would be worth it.

If Apple can do such a wonderful job at virtualizing their old 9.x systems for use within their 10.x systems until people fully transitioned over to the new software at their own pace, I see no reason why Microsoft shouldn't be able to do so as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computer buying cycles:<br />
  Big Corporations with Lots of Cash have the ability to buy new hardware every 3 years. Smaller, older businesses do Not: In fact many small businesses are still in the &#8220;If it isn&#8217;t broke, why fix it?&#8221; mentality. Our particular facility still has hardware here that is 6 years old (or older in some cases): The older hardware actually has a better ability to run out on the hot factory floor than the newer hardware does (the best we can ever deploy out onto the factory CANNOT be faster than 1.5ghz: It would otherwise crash during the hot summer months).</p>
<p>Hardware support:<br />
  Why not make it that, If its a driver that works with NT4, that it should still work in some way with Windows 7? Linux is wonderful with this in that I&#8217;ve been able to continue using hardware that was designed for Windows 95 in the current day whereas windows doesn&#8217;t even Want to look at it or even acknowledge its presence In this day of virtualization, there should be SOME way to virtualize a driver instance to where it will still function without stranding the user with a windows-worthless piece of hardware.</p>
<p>Applocker:<br />
  If they can make it to where an administrator can, just before deployment of a machine to a user, go ahead and direct the applocker to &#8220;Scan this machine for All the existing executables and ONLY allow the existing detected executables to be run from this point forward&#8221;, Then Applocker I think would be worth it.</p>
<p>If Apple can do such a wonderful job at virtualizing their old 9.x systems for use within their 10.x systems until people fully transitioned over to the new software at their own pace, I see no reason why Microsoft shouldn&#8217;t be able to do so as well.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_8OC2CpQWtkwnHPeEMMbOo0_Lu4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_8OC2CpQWtkwnHPeEMMbOo0_Lu4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_8OC2CpQWtkwnHPeEMMbOo0_Lu4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_8OC2CpQWtkwnHPeEMMbOo0_Lu4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/KnkVoFsHdD0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/12/04/discussing-windows-7-with-mark-minasi/#comment-20</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security policies for Windows systems by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/JM12x_0ZLLM/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/11/07/security-policies-for-windows-systems/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Security In Vpn&lt;/strong&gt;

Intriguing idea, but I don't know if I believe you one hundred percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Security In Vpn</strong></p>
<p>Intriguing idea, but I don&#8217;t know if I believe you one hundred percent.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6bYqBZBY1Cd8XynMHhR7hQRhFBw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6bYqBZBY1Cd8XynMHhR7hQRhFBw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6bYqBZBY1Cd8XynMHhR7hQRhFBw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/6bYqBZBY1Cd8XynMHhR7hQRhFBw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/JM12x_0ZLLM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/11/07/security-policies-for-windows-systems/#comment-19</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNS flaw threatens Windows shops by TheDemodog</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/AgtnPWw6yPM/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/08/07/dns-flaw-threatens-windows-shops/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>Useful and interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful and interesting.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/df_iGAgBFVsPNxSJO75yrbz4gRI/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/df_iGAgBFVsPNxSJO75yrbz4gRI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/df_iGAgBFVsPNxSJO75yrbz4gRI/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/df_iGAgBFVsPNxSJO75yrbz4gRI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/AgtnPWw6yPM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/08/07/dns-flaw-threatens-windows-shops/#comment-16</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAP and encryption can improve Vista security by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/PvmaAkxxDoo/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/10/nap-and-encryption-can-improve-vista-security/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;file security&lt;/strong&gt;

I can't believe I missed this! I'm going to have to do some more reading me thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>file security</strong></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe I missed this! I&#8217;m going to have to do some more reading me thinks.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jPi69qfaWoUPbejaXpzrGDAskr4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jPi69qfaWoUPbejaXpzrGDAskr4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jPi69qfaWoUPbejaXpzrGDAskr4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jPi69qfaWoUPbejaXpzrGDAskr4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/PvmaAkxxDoo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/10/nap-and-encryption-can-improve-vista-security/#comment-15</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Configure user rights in Windows systems by add management network url</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/waA49rvXOJI/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/26/configure-user-rights-in-windows-systems/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;add management network url&lt;/strong&gt;

It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>add management network url</strong></p>
<p>It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gJA5kptphopEZv-HZ3UYjSEGUKk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gJA5kptphopEZv-HZ3UYjSEGUKk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gJA5kptphopEZv-HZ3UYjSEGUKk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gJA5kptphopEZv-HZ3UYjSEGUKk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/waA49rvXOJI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/26/configure-user-rights-in-windows-systems/#comment-14</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Critical patches for IE and Office released by hotnetsoft ddl</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/sTY0SjRDM3o/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/04/15/critical-patches-for-ie-and-office-released/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;greatings&lt;/strong&gt;

agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>greatings</strong></p>
<p>agree
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WEFRdAqwMOVgPDxD5VClEjzgTVA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WEFRdAqwMOVgPDxD5VClEjzgTVA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WEFRdAqwMOVgPDxD5VClEjzgTVA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/WEFRdAqwMOVgPDxD5VClEjzgTVA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/sTY0SjRDM3o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/04/15/critical-patches-for-ie-and-office-released/#comment-13</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s hot in Windows security: Updating Windows Update; new IE scare by Internet Tv Meta Search Engines Target Stores Online</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/ujYVKmgA0pY/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/11/whats-hot-in-windows-security-updating-windows-update-new-ie-scare/#comment-10</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Internet Tv Meta Search Engines Target Stores Online&lt;/strong&gt;

I didn't agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Internet Tv Meta Search Engines Target Stores Online</strong></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2KU-hfWWVeHYuNa8OXjimjnpinM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2KU-hfWWVeHYuNa8OXjimjnpinM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2KU-hfWWVeHYuNa8OXjimjnpinM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2KU-hfWWVeHYuNa8OXjimjnpinM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/ujYVKmgA0pY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/11/whats-hot-in-windows-security-updating-windows-update-new-ie-scare/#comment-10</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows server security: Security expert roundup by small business server</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/eGB9QuES4GA/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/12/10/windows-server-security-security-expert-roundup/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;small business server&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>small business server</strong>
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ndF6WVkvpYATUgXA1M6OM8C7lgY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ndF6WVkvpYATUgXA1M6OM8C7lgY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ndF6WVkvpYATUgXA1M6OM8C7lgY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ndF6WVkvpYATUgXA1M6OM8C7lgY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/eGB9QuES4GA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/12/10/windows-server-security-security-expert-roundup/#comment-6</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s hot in Windows security: Updating Windows Update; new IE scare by Finley</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/4VtvT1ODVh4/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/11/whats-hot-in-windows-security-updating-windows-update-new-ie-scare/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;internet security risks&lt;/strong&gt;

Intriguing idea, but I don't know if I believe you one hundred percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>internet security risks</strong></p>
<p>Intriguing idea, but I don&#8217;t know if I believe you one hundred percent.
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SABR6dFY0vUcniN9NRRuAkH-iz8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SABR6dFY0vUcniN9NRRuAkH-iz8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SABR6dFY0vUcniN9NRRuAkH-iz8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SABR6dFY0vUcniN9NRRuAkH-iz8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/4VtvT1ODVh4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/11/whats-hot-in-windows-security-updating-windows-update-new-ie-scare/#comment-5</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ins and outs of Windows Server 2008 by podcast directory</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~3/ZDxf58B1Cxc/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/14/ins-and-outs-of-windows-server-2008/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;podcast directory&lt;/strong&gt;

I wholeheartedly 100% agree. I could not have said it any better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>podcast directory</strong></p>
<p>I wholeheartedly 100% agree. I could not have said it any better
</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ZMwsO96UHeXCl1cwAEmCjveL-wk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ZMwsO96UHeXCl1cwAEmCjveL-wk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ZMwsO96UHeXCl1cwAEmCjveL-wk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ZMwsO96UHeXCl1cwAEmCjveL-wk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDesktopManagementDepot/~4/ZDxf58B1Cxc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
				<feedburner:origLink>http://desktopmanagement.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/14/ins-and-outs-of-windows-server-2008/#comment-4</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
