<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Destiny Magazine</title>
	
	<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info</link>
	<description>Destiny - a magazine for Australian nationalists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForDestinyMagazine" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsfordestinymagazine" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Destiny magazine, issue 9 [latest issue] by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2011/05/31/destiny-magazine-issue-9/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=1682#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Do you guys have online payment options to subscribe to Destiny Magazine - eg. Paypal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you guys have online payment options to subscribe to Destiny Magazine &#8211; eg. Paypal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best from the West by JPower</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2009/04/21/6-the-best-from-the-west/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>JPower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=1239#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to Graeme Campbell? Apart from this interview, who knows what he is doing now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to Graeme Campbell? Apart from this interview, who knows what he is doing now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving our schools by Destiny</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2007/08/20/1-improving-our-schools/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Destiny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=572#comment-84</guid>
		<description>The standard usage that has been adopted by Destiny magazine is:
"it's" is used when it is a contraction of "it is" (with an apostrophe)
"its" is used when it is a possessive (without an apostrophe)

The &lt;a href="http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/its" rel="nofollow"&gt;Oxford Dictionaries&lt;/a&gt; site says: "Its... A common error in writing is to confuse the possessive its (as in turn the camera on its side; ) with the contraction it’s (short for either it is or it has, as in it’s my fault; ; it’s been a hot day; ). The confusion is at least partly understandable since other possessive forms (singular nouns) do take an apostrophe + -s, as in the girl’s bike; ; the President’s smile"

&lt;a href="http://www.apostrophe.org.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Apostrophe Protection Society&lt;/a&gt; says: "please note that its, which is usually used as a possessive adjective (like our, his etc), does not take an apostrophe"

&lt;a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/POSSESSIVE_PRONOUN.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Encyclopedia.com&lt;/a&gt; says: "Possessive determiners never take apostrophes: its is the determiner, while it's is short for it is or it has".

&lt;a href="http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000227.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;English Plus&lt;/a&gt; says: "Incorrect: The mother cat carried it's kitten in it's mouth. (Possessive pronoun, no apostrophe)".

Strunk's "&lt;a href="http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Elements of Style&lt;/a&gt;" (1918) says: "The pronominal possessives hers, its, theirs, yours, and oneself have no apostrophe".

Wikipedia has a page on this subject: &lt;a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/its" rel="nofollow"&gt;"its"&lt;/a&gt; (and see the page &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possessive_pronoun" rel="nofollow"&gt;"possessive pronoun"&lt;/a&gt;).

However, there is more to this issue...

&lt;a href="http://www.word-detective.com/back-d.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Word Detective&lt;/a&gt; says  "Strictly speaking, in modern usage the possessive form of the pronoun "it" is, as you note, "its." The formation "it's" is a contraction, standing for "it is" (or "it has"). Thus we might say "It's (it is) a nice day for sailing, but my boat has lost its (the boat's) rudder." The difference between the two forms is clear, but evidently curiously difficult for many people to remember. 
At the risk of giving aid and comfort to the "ungrammarians" among us, however, I must note that the difference between "it's" and "its" was not always so definite. Until the 19th century, in fact, "it's" was usually considered the possessive of "it" -- in the Fall, a tree shed "it's" leaves. The usual contraction of "it is" was "'tis." Only when "'tis" came to be regarded as an archaic form in the 19th century did the use of "it's" as a contraction of "it is" push out the use of "it's" as a possessive. I know this is a bit hard to follow, but the point is that the "rule" used to be the exact opposite of what it is today."

To sum it up: Using "it's" in a possessive sense is incorrect by terms of modern usage; however, it could be argued that it is technically correct by terms of archaic usage. It has been decided that Destiny magazine shall apply the modern usage of "its" when it is used in a possessive sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The standard usage that has been adopted by Destiny magazine is:<br />
&#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; is used when it is a contraction of &#8220;it is&#8221; (with an apostrophe)<br />
&#8220;its&#8221; is used when it is a possessive (without an apostrophe)</p>
<p>The <a href="http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/its" rel="nofollow">Oxford Dictionaries</a> site says: &#8220;Its&#8230; A common error in writing is to confuse the possessive its (as in turn the camera on its side; ) with the contraction it’s (short for either it is or it has, as in it’s my fault; ; it’s been a hot day; ). The confusion is at least partly understandable since other possessive forms (singular nouns) do take an apostrophe + -s, as in the girl’s bike; ; the President’s smile&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apostrophe.org.uk" rel="nofollow">The Apostrophe Protection Society</a> says: &#8220;please note that its, which is usually used as a possessive adjective (like our, his etc), does not take an apostrophe&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/POSSESSIVE_PRONOUN.aspx" rel="nofollow">Encyclopedia.com</a> says: &#8220;Possessive determiners never take apostrophes: its is the determiner, while it&#8217;s is short for it is or it has&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000227.htm" rel="nofollow">English Plus</a> says: &#8220;Incorrect: The mother cat carried it&#8217;s kitten in it&#8217;s mouth. (Possessive pronoun, no apostrophe)&#8221;.</p>
<p>Strunk&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html" rel="nofollow">The Elements of Style</a>&#8221; (1918) says: &#8220;The pronominal possessives hers, its, theirs, yours, and oneself have no apostrophe&#8221;.</p>
<p>Wikipedia has a page on this subject: <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/its" rel="nofollow">&#8220;its&#8221;</a> (and see the page <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possessive_pronoun" rel="nofollow">&#8220;possessive pronoun&#8221;</a>).</p>
<p>However, there is more to this issue&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.word-detective.com/back-d.html" rel="nofollow">Word Detective</a> says  &#8220;Strictly speaking, in modern usage the possessive form of the pronoun &#8220;it&#8221; is, as you note, &#8220;its.&#8221; The formation &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; is a contraction, standing for &#8220;it is&#8221; (or &#8220;it has&#8221;). Thus we might say &#8220;It&#8217;s (it is) a nice day for sailing, but my boat has lost its (the boat&#8217;s) rudder.&#8221; The difference between the two forms is clear, but evidently curiously difficult for many people to remember.<br />
At the risk of giving aid and comfort to the &#8220;ungrammarians&#8221; among us, however, I must note that the difference between &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;its&#8221; was not always so definite. Until the 19th century, in fact, &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; was usually considered the possessive of &#8220;it&#8221; &#8212; in the Fall, a tree shed &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; leaves. The usual contraction of &#8220;it is&#8221; was &#8220;&#8217;tis.&#8221; Only when &#8220;&#8217;tis&#8221; came to be regarded as an archaic form in the 19th century did the use of &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; as a contraction of &#8220;it is&#8221; push out the use of &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; as a possessive. I know this is a bit hard to follow, but the point is that the &#8220;rule&#8221; used to be the exact opposite of what it is today.&#8221;</p>
<p>To sum it up: Using &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; in a possessive sense is incorrect by terms of modern usage; however, it could be argued that it is technically correct by terms of archaic usage. It has been decided that Destiny magazine shall apply the modern usage of &#8220;its&#8221; when it is used in a possessive sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving our schools by Questioning Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2007/08/20/1-improving-our-schools/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Questioning Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=572#comment-83</guid>
		<description>On your grammar, in the sentence with "disguised in its content", should that be "disguised in it's content" with an apostrophe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your grammar, in the sentence with &#8220;disguised in its content&#8221;, should that be &#8220;disguised in it&#8217;s content&#8221; with an apostrophe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s time to ZIP up the borders! by Casper Woodvine</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2010/08/27/its-time-to-zip-up-the-borders/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper Woodvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=1780#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Great work, Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Globalisation — At what price? by Terry Odgers</title>
		<link>http://www.destinymagazine.info/2009/04/21/6-globalisation-at-what-price/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Odgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.destinymagazine.info/testsite/?p=808#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Well, as they say, there is no such thing as a free lunch! So what makes the advocates of free trade believe there is actually such a thing as free trade? Free trade and Keynesian economics has been largely proven unworkable and if anyone requires a graphic example of why this kind of economic management should never be applied in a healthy economy I would suggest you start by looking at the US and Europe as key examples of such failed thinking. And on that note, Australia is not that far behind the mess that now passes for economies in the larger Western world. We have been taken for a ride people, by successive Australian governments who have opted for the softer solutions based on ideology rather than tackle the issues head on with hard and pragmatic policies which would have protected us from the stupidity and cowardice of a declining West that is now more intent on appeasement than in protecting what is rightfully ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as they say, there is no such thing as a free lunch! So what makes the advocates of free trade believe there is actually such a thing as free trade? Free trade and Keynesian economics has been largely proven unworkable and if anyone requires a graphic example of why this kind of economic management should never be applied in a healthy economy I would suggest you start by looking at the US and Europe as key examples of such failed thinking. And on that note, Australia is not that far behind the mess that now passes for economies in the larger Western world. We have been taken for a ride people, by successive Australian governments who have opted for the softer solutions based on ideology rather than tackle the issues head on with hard and pragmatic policies which would have protected us from the stupidity and cowardice of a declining West that is now more intent on appeasement than in protecting what is rightfully ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 280/313 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.destinymagazine.info @ 2011-12-31 16:50:02 -->

