<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for agileplaces.com</title>
	<link>http://distributedteams.org</link>
	<description>IT Project Management Services on demand</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsfordistributedteamsorg" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Defined vs. Empirical Process Control by queroeropoo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/o39dm26L_AI/</link>
		<dc:creator>queroeropoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Good information to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Good information to me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/o39dm26L_AI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-191</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defined vs. Empirical Process Control by amenodimeno</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/4F30r4P3RQ8/</link>
		<dc:creator>amenodimeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Good story for me but please more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Good story for me but please more details.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/4F30r4P3RQ8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-190</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defined vs. Empirical Process Control by amenodimeno</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/I66ojbMAhi4/</link>
		<dc:creator>amenodimeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>That's good man, keep it going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->That's good man, keep it going.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/I66ojbMAhi4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-189</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defined vs. Empirical Process Control by romonoeroetoko</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/NAQGmJX55fc/</link>
		<dc:creator>romonoeroetoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Your news is a cool stuff man, keep it going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Your news is a cool stuff man, keep it going.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/NAQGmJX55fc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2007/06/08/defined-vs-empirical-process-control/#comment-188</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Executing global strategies with the Program Management Office by Claudius</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/Adl92pN-UnY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2006/01/15/executing-global-strategies-with-pmo/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Blin ... really beautifully written! All this is so familiar ... and truthfully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Blin ... really beautifully written! All this is so familiar ... and truthfully!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/Adl92pN-UnY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2006/01/15/executing-global-strategies-with-pmo/#comment-159</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Agile Hallmarks by Agile roadmap « One Yoxel</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~3/vXb9fl5HePI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile roadmap « One Yoxel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distributedteams.org/2006/03/11/agile-hallmarks/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] The point of having two plans long term release plan (or roadmap plan) and a short term iteration plan comes up all the time with agile/SCRUM. (Agile Hallmarks post brings this topic up again and again, accompanied with very neat diagrams and chars.) I believe it is quite challenging to follow your roadmap. Sure you can create it as your management and marketing books tell you but will you be able to follow it exactly? If the market requirements change swiftly, will it make sense to follow it? In my case, having prioritized backlog gives me an idea of my overall roadmap but it is also quite flexible, because the iteration plans are really the ones that align that roadmap with current market situation. I have written down a few more thoughts on this topic before: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] The point of having two plans long term release plan (or roadmap plan) and a short term iteration plan comes up all the time with agile/SCRUM. (Agile Hallmarks post brings this topic up again and again, accompanied with very neat diagrams and chars.) I believe it is quite challenging to follow your roadmap. Sure you can create it as your management and marketing books tell you but will you be able to follow it exactly? If the market requirements change swiftly, will it make sense to follow it? In my case, having prioritized backlog gives me an idea of my overall roadmap but it is also quite flexible, because the iteration plans are really the ones that align that roadmap with current market situation. I have written down a few more thoughts on this topic before: [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForDistributedteamsorg/~4/vXb9fl5HePI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://distributedteams.org/2006/03/11/agile-hallmarks/#comment-142</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
