Comments for Dutch Rose Reflections http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog Making use of information Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:15:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Comment on Twitter acceptance in 6 phases by Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » We Dutch understand loyalty programs http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/tUtbXh132L4/ Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » We Dutch understand loyalty programs Tue, 25 May 2010 07:16:27 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=99#comment-7178 [...] fuzz is all the first phase of technology acceptance: denial. I have written about this before: Twitter acceptance in 6 stages. If Foursquare becomes successful, we will find a way around these issues and further develop our [...] [...] fuzz is all the first phase of technology acceptance: denial. I have written about this before: Twitter acceptance in 6 stages. If Foursquare becomes successful, we will find a way around these issues and further develop our [...]

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2009/07/twitter-acceptance-in-6-phases/#comment-7178 Comment on Twitter acceptance in 6 phases by Time Synchronisation http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/XyGkYfkL2aY/ Time Synchronisation Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:33:49 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=99#comment-7166 <strong>Facebook...</strong> This post was mentioned on Facebook by Richard Hawkesford.... Facebook…

This post was mentioned on Facebook by Richard Hawkesford….

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2009/07/twitter-acceptance-in-6-phases/#comment-7166 Comment on On diamonds and information quality by Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Marketing dashboards should turn inside out http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/hoFcVGwomGg/ Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Marketing dashboards should turn inside out Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:26:42 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=44#comment-7160 [...] that they need. Marketing is about CONTENT. Marketing is about content quality as defined in the 4 C’s. And how do the current marketing dashboards help the marketing professionals with this problem? [...] [...] that they need. Marketing is about CONTENT. Marketing is about content quality as defined in the 4 C’s. And how do the current marketing dashboards help the marketing professionals with this problem? [...]

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/4-cs-for-information/#comment-7160 Comment on Who will use what I write? by Антон Павлович http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/87yvthOzuGA/ Антон Павлович Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:27:10 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=85#comment-7139 <strong><a href="http://amerika-ua.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a> ....</strong> Мне вообщем-то не понравилось)... ….

Мне вообщем-то не понравилось)…

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2009/02/who-will-use-what-i-write/#comment-7139 Comment on Watch out for the Internet Police! by Lee Allgood http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/CXPXkAhr6Fo/ Lee Allgood Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:01:44 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=61#comment-7001 Is this available in English? http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/emergence_in_kennismanagement_09.pdf Is this available in English? http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/emergence_in_kennismanagement_09.pdf

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/watch-out-for-the-internet-police/#comment-7001 Comment on Watch out for the Internet Police! by Twitter Trackbacks for Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Watch out for the Internet Police! [dutchrosereflections.com] on Topsy.com http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/HZ9SOoOXdT8/ Twitter Trackbacks for Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Watch out for the Internet Police! [dutchrosereflections.com] on Topsy.com Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:00:00 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=61#comment-6999 [...] Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Watch out for the Internet Police! dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/watch-out-for-the-internet-police – view page – cached One of the blogs (Dutch) I follow pointed me to a speech by Dr. Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google on the future of technology. Schmidt points out that within a few years we will carry around more video material on our iPOD’s than we will be able to view in a lifetime. We are entering the Information Age, where information is ubiquitous, omni-present. And besides the rather obvious referrals to Moore’s law (processor speed doubles every 18 months) and Kryder’s law (hard disk capacity doubles every year), he touched on a subject that is close to my heart: the power of information. — From the page [...] [...] Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » Watch out for the Internet Police! dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/watch-out-for-the-internet-police – view page – cached One of the blogs (Dutch) I follow pointed me to a speech by Dr. Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google on the future of technology. Schmidt points out that within a few years we will carry around more video material on our iPOD’s than we will be able to view in a lifetime. We are entering the Information Age, where information is ubiquitous, omni-present. And besides the rather obvious referrals to Moore’s law (processor speed doubles every 18 months) and Kryder’s law (hard disk capacity doubles every year), he touched on a subject that is close to my heart: the power of information. — From the page [...]

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/watch-out-for-the-internet-police/#comment-6999 Comment on On diamonds and information quality by Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » 4 Stages in Content Management – part 3 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/T3XaPuJo2Sg/ Dutch Rose Reflections » Blog Archive » 4 Stages in Content Management – part 3 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:58:52 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=44#comment-6806 [...] channel managers feel that they have no control over content quality (see ‘On diamonds and information quality’). They cannot influence that information arrives on time, is complete and correct and consistent [...] [...] channel managers feel that they have no control over content quality (see ‘On diamonds and information quality’). They cannot influence that information arrives on time, is complete and correct and consistent [...]

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/4-cs-for-information/#comment-6806 Comment on Wisdom Ignorance of the Crowd by Ms. Jo http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/we0unZ0v3rQ/ Ms. Jo Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:54:54 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=58#comment-15 Measuring the value of information by the amount of time uses to either consume or produce it is indeed a start. But that would mean that, measured by the amount of information on the subject on Wikipedia, Klingon is indeed more important as a language than Latin. More people have spent more time writing about it. But I would pose that *for the kind of people who add information to Wikipedia* Klingon is indeed the better language: it relates to one's interests, gives the speaker a higher social status within his or her peer group and may be more amusing to learn. If the majority of Wikipedia editors were historians or linguists, the story might be different. So: the amount of information on a subject is a measure of the time spent producing it. Lots of info = lots of time = lots of value. And if a website gets a lot of pagevieuws many people want to see what's on it, so they spend time on the website, therefore it is valuable for them. But that would mean that http://icanhascheezburger.com/ has more value than this site. Ridiculous! Ah, well, the pics on that site make me laugh, and entertainment is a kind of value. So a useful question is: what kind of value do I want to create? Better minds than mine; help me out here. On company intranet with only work-related information, you can bet your lunch money that if the page on filling out form A127 gets the most hits, that page is the one with the most valuable information for the company's employees. Too bad that, if "pagevieuws = time spent on the information = the value of the info" is the way you measure your information's worth, this measure is so easily skewed. All you have to do to make your article seem valuable is add sex/fluffy kittens/celebrity gossip. So you don't want to start rewarding the contributors to your intranet by the number of hits their articles get. They will start writing things like: "Our new CEO: Hot or Not?" But how to measure "Can this information be used to benefit the company and/or make the world a better place?" Nobody said Informatio management was easy. Measuring the value of information by the amount of time uses to either consume or produce it is indeed a start. But that would mean that, measured by the amount of information on the subject on Wikipedia, Klingon is indeed more important as a language than Latin. More people have spent more time writing about it.

But I would pose that *for the kind of people who add information to Wikipedia* Klingon is indeed the better language: it relates to one’s interests, gives the speaker a higher social status within his or her peer group and may be more amusing to learn. If the majority of Wikipedia editors were historians or linguists, the story might be different.

So: the amount of information on a subject is a measure of the time spent producing it. Lots of info = lots of time = lots of value. And if a website gets a lot of pagevieuws many people want to see what’s on it, so they spend time on the website, therefore it is valuable for them.
But that would mean that http://icanhascheezburger.com/ has more value than this site. Ridiculous!

Ah, well, the pics on that site make me laugh, and entertainment is a kind of value. So a useful question is: what kind of value do I want to create?
Better minds than mine; help me out here.

On company intranet with only work-related information, you can bet your lunch money that if the page on filling out form A127 gets the most hits, that page is the one with the most valuable information for the company’s employees.

Too bad that, if “pagevieuws = time spent on the information = the value of the info” is the way you measure your information’s worth, this measure is so easily skewed. All you have to do to make your article seem valuable is add sex/fluffy kittens/celebrity gossip.

So you don’t want to start rewarding the contributors to your intranet by the number of hits their articles get. They will start writing things like: “Our new CEO: Hot or Not?”

But how to measure “Can this information be used to benefit the company and/or make the world a better place?”
Nobody said Informatio management was easy.

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/wisdom-ignorance-of-the-crowd/#comment-15 Comment on My pain, your gain by Natasja Paulssen http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/jzJKuUqqwtc/ Natasja Paulssen Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:24:29 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=52#comment-13 Hi Dan, good to meet you as well and thanks for your comment. It's funny. I did not think of it in the way you describe, that it is the content life cycle in play here. I just saw information flowing to the party that could use it best. But of course you are right. It must be content maturing and going through the life cycle. Which brings me to the question of how we match the concept of a life cycle with the concept of compound content and reuse of content. For when information flows freely, what is output for one party simply is the input for another. Now of course if you are refering to AIIM's roadmap, then we are talking 'deliver'. But I myself have a hard time connecting that technical term to the value of content for the business. Mind you, technical to me doesn't necessarily mean IT. To the business thinking about information is technical as well. We need to express ourselves in their language. Natasja Hi Dan, good to meet you as well and thanks for your comment.
It’s funny. I did not think of it in the way you describe, that it is the content life cycle in play here. I just saw information flowing to the party that could use it best. But of course you are right. It must be content maturing and going through the life cycle.
Which brings me to the question of how we match the concept of a life cycle with the concept of compound content and reuse of content. For when information flows freely, what is output for one party simply is the input for another.
Now of course if you are refering to AIIM’s roadmap, then we are talking ‘deliver’. But I myself have a hard time connecting that technical term to the value of content for the business. Mind you, technical to me doesn’t necessarily mean IT. To the business thinking about information is technical as well. We need to express ourselves in their language.

Natasja

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/my-pain-your-gain/#comment-13 Comment on My pain, your gain by Dan Keldsen http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForDutchRoseReflections/~3/_9KovPQLpfg/ Dan Keldsen Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:23:36 +0000 http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/?p=52#comment-12 Good meeting you at the Education Advisory Board meeting. Absolutely agree that seeing the larger context is important to being able to demonstrate exactly what the value (and risk) is of content throughout it's lifecycle. Leave it to Dilbert to bring that to mind - but I'll take anything that can help to get these messages through. Cheers, Dan Good meeting you at the Education Advisory Board meeting. Absolutely agree that seeing the larger context is important to being able to demonstrate exactly what the value (and risk) is of content throughout it’s lifecycle. Leave it to Dilbert to bring that to mind - but I’ll take anything that can help to get these messages through.

Cheers,
Dan

]]> http://dutchrosereflections.com/blog/2008/10/my-pain-your-gain/#comment-12