<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Everything Nonfiction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://everythingnonfiction.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 01:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review of MSFS 2024 by Carl Kelsen		</title>
		<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-msfs-2024/#comment-3359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Kelsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 02:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://everythingnonfiction.com/?p=6228#comment-3359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[G’day from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Great enjoyable article!

In my case, I hold an Australian Private Pilots Licence which I have held since the mid 1970s. Most of my ‘real’ flying has been in Piper aircraft such as Cherokees, Warriors and Archer IIs.

With Flight Sims. I have been actively using Flight Simulator to assist me with maintaining my flying skills since the very first Fight Sims appeared back in about 1980. So, that’s well over 40 years experience with Flight Sims.

I currently use MSFS2020 but did purchase a copy of the high end version of MSFS2024. To be completely honest, I have not been impressed with MSFS2024. I expect ‘hope’ that in time it will be great, but for the present I am having no end of trouble with it.

Accordingly, I find myself using MSFS2020 much more than my copy of my recently purchased MSFS2024. I expect that a year from now, we will see MSFS2024 sorted out. But for now I find MSFS2020 is the better sim.

Perhaps having both MSFS 2020 &#038; MSFS2024 on my desk top computer is causing the issues I have. Who knows???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G’day from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia</p>
<p>Great enjoyable article!</p>
<p>In my case, I hold an Australian Private Pilots Licence which I have held since the mid 1970s. Most of my ‘real’ flying has been in Piper aircraft such as Cherokees, Warriors and Archer IIs.</p>
<p>With Flight Sims. I have been actively using Flight Simulator to assist me with maintaining my flying skills since the very first Fight Sims appeared back in about 1980. So, that’s well over 40 years experience with Flight Sims.</p>
<p>I currently use MSFS2020 but did purchase a copy of the high end version of MSFS2024. To be completely honest, I have not been impressed with MSFS2024. I expect ‘hope’ that in time it will be great, but for the present I am having no end of trouble with it.</p>
<p>Accordingly, I find myself using MSFS2020 much more than my copy of my recently purchased MSFS2024. I expect that a year from now, we will see MSFS2024 sorted out. But for now I find MSFS2020 is the better sim.</p>
<p>Perhaps having both MSFS 2020 &amp; MSFS2024 on my desk top computer is causing the issues I have. Who knows???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review of the Netflix documentary series Into the Fire: The Lost Daughter by Emilio		</title>
		<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-the-netflix-documentary-series-into-the-fire-the-lost-daughter/#comment-3358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emilio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://everythingnonfiction.com/?p=5658#comment-3358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-the-netflix-documentary-series-into-the-fire-the-lost-daughter/#comment-3357&quot;&gt;Aaron WILKINS&lt;/a&gt;.

Okay, thanks for pointing out my error. However, I believe that the remains that were found were thought to be about the same age of Aundria when she went missing, thus the reason for the DNA test.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-the-netflix-documentary-series-into-the-fire-the-lost-daughter/#comment-3357">Aaron WILKINS</a>.</p>
<p>Okay, thanks for pointing out my error. However, I believe that the remains that were found were thought to be about the same age of Aundria when she went missing, thus the reason for the DNA test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review of the Netflix documentary series Into the Fire: The Lost Daughter by Aaron WILKINS		</title>
		<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-the-netflix-documentary-series-into-the-fire-the-lost-daughter/#comment-3357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron WILKINS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://everythingnonfiction.com/?p=5658#comment-3357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bad journalism. If you&#039;re going to review make sure you watch it properly and report the facts properly. 

You state above that the Jane Doe case that Cathy was asked to submit comparative DNA for was found around the time Cathy&#039;s daughter went missing. This is completely false. The film makes clear that Aundria went missing in 1989 and the Jane Doe body was found in 1999.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad journalism. If you&#8217;re going to review make sure you watch it properly and report the facts properly. </p>
<p>You state above that the Jane Doe case that Cathy was asked to submit comparative DNA for was found around the time Cathy&#8217;s daughter went missing. This is completely false. The film makes clear that Aundria went missing in 1989 and the Jane Doe body was found in 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review of Pepsi, Where&#8217;s My Jet? by Best of Everything Nonfiction 2022		</title>
		<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com/review-of-pepsi-wheres-my-jet/#comment-3352</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Best of Everything Nonfiction 2022]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 19:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://everythingnonfiction.com/?p=3625#comment-3352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Pepsi, Where&#8217;s My Jet [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Pepsi, Where&#8217;s My Jet [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Christian &#8220;Kit&#8221; Martin story by Robin Simoneau		</title>
		<link>https://everythingnonfiction.com/the-christian-kit-martin-story/#comment-3308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Simoneau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 10:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://everythingnonfiction.com/?p=3204#comment-3308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why did the judge accept the shell casing evidence in the first place, the witness testimony, but exclude the polygraph results of said witness? This piece of “evidence” couldn&#039;t follow the proper chain of custody bc it was never even established, a fact by itself that should&#039;ve excluded it from the trial.
Evidently the police thought it could&#039;ve been planted evidence so a polygraph examination was conducted and ultimately failed. So what was the point in administering it then, confirmation bias? So if she passed then he&#039;s guilty, if she failed then he&#039;s still guilty bc she&#039;s simply nervous and stressed creating a false response? 
Furthermore, how it even possible for police and forensics to miss such a vital, key piece of evidence twice!? The 2nd time they would&#039;ve been desperate and determined to uncover , thoroughly searching with a fine tooth comb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the judge accept the shell casing evidence in the first place, the witness testimony, but exclude the polygraph results of said witness? This piece of “evidence” couldn&#8217;t follow the proper chain of custody bc it was never even established, a fact by itself that should&#8217;ve excluded it from the trial.<br />
Evidently the police thought it could&#8217;ve been planted evidence so a polygraph examination was conducted and ultimately failed. So what was the point in administering it then, confirmation bias? So if she passed then he&#8217;s guilty, if she failed then he&#8217;s still guilty bc she&#8217;s simply nervous and stressed creating a false response?<br />
Furthermore, how it even possible for police and forensics to miss such a vital, key piece of evidence twice!? The 2nd time they would&#8217;ve been desperate and determined to uncover , thoroughly searching with a fine tooth comb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
