<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fewleftstanding.net</title>
	<link>http://fewleftstanding.net</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForFewleftstandingnet" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="commentsforfewleftstandingnet" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Fullscreen vs. Widescreen by Michael</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=25#comment-12017</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=25#comment-12017</guid>
		<description>I think Jeff is wrong. If he had "the mask" that had both fullscreen and widescreen formats, chances are that if you press play two images will be shown to compare the two formats. But they display it wrong, the fullscreen version seems to be complete and the widescreen version cuts off the top and bottom. This is probably how jeff made his experiment. I borrowed the movie "underdog" and it was the same, it displayed the two formats and fullscreen seems to have way more picture, but when I actually compared both formats, widescreen still had more picture. Ex. fullscreen-the dog flies and carries the boy while the camera zooms on the dog and then down on the boy. widescreen-same as fullscreen but shows the atmosphere and the sky at the sides. I compared other scenes and concluded that widescreen showed a much farther perspective than fullscreen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jeff is wrong. If he had &#8220;the mask&#8221; that had both fullscreen and widescreen formats, chances are that if you press play two images will be shown to compare the two formats. But they display it wrong, the fullscreen version seems to be complete and the widescreen version cuts off the top and bottom. This is probably how jeff made his experiment. I borrowed the movie &#8220;underdog&#8221; and it was the same, it displayed the two formats and fullscreen seems to have way more picture, but when I actually compared both formats, widescreen still had more picture. Ex. fullscreen-the dog flies and carries the boy while the camera zooms on the dog and then down on the boy. widescreen-same as fullscreen but shows the atmosphere and the sky at the sides. I compared other scenes and concluded that widescreen showed a much farther perspective than fullscreen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wordpress Timestamp Feature by Clipper</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=102#comment-11288</link>
		<author>Clipper</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=102#comment-11288</guid>
		<description>I love the feature as well.  What's especially weird is that I wrote this comment on March 22nd, and had it timestamp for March 20th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the feature as well.  What&#8217;s especially weird is that I wrote this comment on March 22nd, and had it timestamp for March 20th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wordpress Timestamp Feature by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=102#comment-11123</link>
		<author>Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=102#comment-11123</guid>
		<description>Forgot to say - like the layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to say - like the layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I rank for Syphallis by Kris</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=130#comment-8073</link>
		<author>Kris</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=130#comment-8073</guid>
		<description>no problem. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no problem. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manage Adwords From Your Desktop by Bill</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=129#comment-7924</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=129#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>I agree, the web based interface isn't fast enough for me. How many adwords accounts do you have?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the web based interface isn&#8217;t fast enough for me. How many adwords accounts do you have?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manage Adwords From Your Desktop by Gary Lee</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=129#comment-7913</link>
		<author>Gary Lee</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=129#comment-7913</guid>
		<description>I think Ms. Danielle would love this program. I never liked having to login all the time to manage my adwords accounts. I know Google is trying to make everything web based, but I just don't think the speed is there just yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ms. Danielle would love this program. I never liked having to login all the time to manage my adwords accounts. I know Google is trying to make everything web based, but I just don&#8217;t think the speed is there just yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TFK Concert by Fewleftstanding.net » Blog Archive » I rank for Syphallis</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=17#comment-7902</link>
		<author>Fewleftstanding.net » Blog Archive » I rank for Syphallis</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=17#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>[...] other night I was doing some keyword optimization, and I found that one of my old posts (actually..comments from my old post, thanks Kris)was ranked #19 for Syphallis. I was laughing, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] other night I was doing some keyword optimization, and I found that one of my old posts (actually..comments from my old post, thanks Kris)was ranked #19 for Syphallis. I was laughing, but [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Template by Tyler Ingram</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=131#comment-7885</link>
		<author>Tyler Ingram</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=131#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Template by Bill</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=131#comment-7883</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=131#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>Ok, I emailed you..and I will update your url.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I emailed you..and I will update your url.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moved To Bluefur by Bill</title>
		<link>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=125#comment-7882</link>
		<author>Bill</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fewleftstanding.net/?p=125#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>I'm actually from Pitt Meadows :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually from Pitt Meadows :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
