<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hacking Christianity</title>
	
	<link>http://hackingchristianity.net</link>
	<description>Faith.Tech.Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForHackingChristianity" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforhackingchristianity" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Response: Scott Campbell – PlanUMC was Unconstitutional - HackingChristianity hosts exchange of responses to Judicial Council Smackdown by Becca</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/response-scott-campbell-planumc-was-unconstitutional.html/comment-page-1#comment-144973</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2925#comment-144973</guid>
		<description>I have a thought: BOOM. 

Scott is absolutely right (not that this surprises me), but what I love about this is the call to consider not only the content of how PlanUMC and its predecessors are in error, but the process that allowed us to get to this point. Such a consideration opens us up to new dialogue and process in the next four years, and invites us to create a transparent conversation and organization for the good of the whole church. 

Becca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a thought: BOOM. </p>
<p>Scott is absolutely right (not that this surprises me), but what I love about this is the call to consider not only the content of how PlanUMC and its predecessors are in error, but the process that allowed us to get to this point. Such a consideration opens us up to new dialogue and process in the next four years, and invites us to create a transparent conversation and organization for the good of the whole church. </p>
<p>Becca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official UMC iPhone App [review] by interactive online iphone android apps solutions ad4d advertisment festival walk mtr hk</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2011/10/official-umc-iphone-app-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-144735</link>
		<dc:creator>interactive online iphone android apps solutions ad4d advertisment festival walk mtr hk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2129#comment-144735</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;interactive online iphone android apps solutions ad4d advertisment festival walk mtr hk...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Official UMC iPhone App [review] « Hacking Christianity[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>interactive online iphone android apps solutions ad4d advertisment festival walk mtr hk&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Official UMC iPhone App [review] &laquo; Hacking Christianity[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Response: Scott Campbell – PlanUMC was Unconstitutional - HackingChristianity hosts exchange of responses to Judicial Council Smackdown by Creed Pogue</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/response-scott-campbell-planumc-was-unconstitutional.html/comment-page-1#comment-144712</link>
		<dc:creator>Creed Pogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2925#comment-144712</guid>
		<description>If the US Supreme Court overturns all of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) because it finds the individual mandate unconstitutional, both Scott Campbell and I will be outraged because the Court overreached for at least two reasons.  The first is that the mandate doesn't kick in until 2014 so it is rather impossible to claim that someone's rights have been abridged when nothing has happened yet.  The second is that the rest of the law can stand on its own without the mandate.  The same is true of Decision 1210.  Reasonable people can reasonably differ about whether the General Council would be a violation of the UMC Constitution.  There was no need for a quick decision and there was no need for a full overturning of a 60% vote of the General Conference.

Process arguments often hide arguments on the merits that are very weak but appear stronger because style triumphs over substance.  The same is true here.  A lot of us like sausage but would not want to see it made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the US Supreme Court overturns all of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) because it finds the individual mandate unconstitutional, both Scott Campbell and I will be outraged because the Court overreached for at least two reasons.  The first is that the mandate doesn&#8217;t kick in until 2014 so it is rather impossible to claim that someone&#8217;s rights have been abridged when nothing has happened yet.  The second is that the rest of the law can stand on its own without the mandate.  The same is true of Decision 1210.  Reasonable people can reasonably differ about whether the General Council would be a violation of the UMC Constitution.  There was no need for a quick decision and there was no need for a full overturning of a 60% vote of the General Conference.</p>
<p>Process arguments often hide arguments on the merits that are very weak but appear stronger because style triumphs over substance.  The same is true here.  A lot of us like sausage but would not want to see it made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodist Kudzu – The Problem of Beth Moore - If someone is setting fire to your house, why let them in? by Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2011/09/methodist-kudzu-the-problem-of-beth-moore.html/comment-page-2#comment-144261</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=1882#comment-144261</guid>
		<description>Hogwash! I have belonged to a Methodist Church as well as a SBC, in our families moves across the country. Beth Moore is the real deal, a Spirit annointed minister of the gospel. Your article is complete hogwash. god bless your soul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogwash! I have belonged to a Methodist Church as well as a SBC, in our families moves across the country. Beth Moore is the real deal, a Spirit annointed minister of the gospel. Your article is complete hogwash. god bless your soul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodist Kudzu – The Problem of Beth Moore - If someone is setting fire to your house, why let them in? by Charlotte A. Hendee</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2011/09/methodist-kudzu-the-problem-of-beth-moore.html/comment-page-2#comment-144242</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte A. Hendee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=1882#comment-144242</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely spot on.  Thank you for this.  She should not be carried by Cokesbury, and neither should David C. Cook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely spot on.  Thank you for this.  She should not be carried by Cokesbury, and neither should David C. Cook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From The Walking Dead to The Walking-Around Life - From External to Internal Motivators by Rick</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/from-the-walking-dead-to-the-walking-around-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-143826</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2842#comment-143826</guid>
		<description>Am a fanatic of the Walking dead tv series and love to watch this all the time. I download the episode thru internet. You really rock the World Rick! Thanks you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am a fanatic of the Walking dead tv series and love to watch this all the time. I download the episode thru internet. You really rock the World Rick! Thanks you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From The Walking Dead to The Walking-Around Life - From External to Internal Motivators by Doug</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/from-the-walking-dead-to-the-walking-around-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-143650</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2842#comment-143650</guid>
		<description>Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From The Walking Dead to The Walking-Around Life - From External to Internal Motivators by Becca</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/from-the-walking-dead-to-the-walking-around-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-143636</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2842#comment-143636</guid>
		<description>You rock the world in so many ways. 

Becca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You rock the world in so many ways. </p>
<p>Becca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Join the #DreamUMC Tweetup! #UMC by Twitter Explosion | Central Texas Conference UMC Youth &amp; Young Adult Ministry</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2012/05/how-to-join-the-dreamumc-tweetup.html/comment-page-1#comment-143635</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Explosion | Central Texas Conference UMC Youth &amp; Young Adult Ministry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=2904#comment-143635</guid>
		<description>[...] more information about twitter and how to participate in a tweetup? This informative post is very helpful! Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more information about twitter and how to participate in a tweetup? This informative post is very helpful! Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop worrying about the 18-30yos - Pastors take a long view of young adult outreach by Is it possible our churches are optimized for the wrong kind of growth?</title>
		<link>http://hackingchristianity.net/2011/03/stop-worrying-about-the-18-30yos.html/comment-page-1#comment-143633</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it possible our churches are optimized for the wrong kind of growth?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackingchristianity.net/?p=1457#comment-143633</guid>
		<description>[...] but more interested in sleeping in on Sunday morning than going to church (read about this here, here and here), or those newly-marrieds who now, for a brief moment, are open to changing their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but more interested in sleeping in on Sunday morning than going to church (read about this here, here and here), or those newly-marrieds who now, for a brief moment, are open to changing their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

