<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Innovation Nation: Interactive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation</link>
	<description>Taking the strategy forward</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on General Comments by David Hughes</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/general-comments#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://212.241.215.253/innovationnation/general-comments/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I am responding to Richard Halkett's comments.

Well, as for measurement it interesting that it is now called the NESTA Index!  While I am all for improving existing systems I remain of the view that this is a distraction.

As for setting a new tone in Government policy I think this is just plain wrong.   Where are the real measurable actions that will improve UK GDP in the next three years?  How can you sensibly separate out Innovation (DIUS) from Business (BERR)?  When will we redirect the R&#38;D tax credit money into something more productive?  When will we stop flogging the SBRI horse and recognise that it will never match the US SBIR scheme unless radically changed? .... I could go on.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am responding to Richard Halkett&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>Well, as for measurement it interesting that it is now called the NESTA Index!  While I am all for improving existing systems I remain of the view that this is a distraction.</p>
<p>As for setting a new tone in Government policy I think this is just plain wrong.   Where are the real measurable actions that will improve UK GDP in the next three years?  How can you sensibly separate out Innovation (DIUS) from Business (BERR)?  When will we redirect the R&amp;D tax credit money into something more productive?  When will we stop flogging the SBRI horse and recognise that it will never match the US SBIR scheme unless radically changed? &#8230;. I could go on&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Strong and Innovative Research Base by Debbie Duis</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/41#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Duis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=41#comment-286</guid>
		<description>One new innovative idea can spawn a multitude of related innovations in different sectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One new innovative idea can spawn a multitude of related innovations in different sectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Steps and Tracking Progress by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/46#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=46#comment-285</guid>
		<description>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET suggests that a practical way of ensuring gender equality is addressed, would be to ensure that there are robust gender elements within the Index and the benchmarks for tracking innovation performance. We can help. Innovation and gender research should also be funded and be a key area for the new research centre (next paragraph!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET suggests that a practical way of ensuring gender equality is addressed, would be to ensure that there are robust gender elements within the Index and the benchmarks for tracking innovation performance. We can help. Innovation and gender research should also be funded and be a key area for the new research centre (next paragraph!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Places by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/45#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=45#comment-284</guid>
		<description>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET has evidence of regional differences with respect to the activity and representation of women.  This is another dimension in which gender is relevant. It  has to be taken into account in the work  on performance etc. at regional and other structural levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET has evidence of regional differences with respect to the activity and representation of women.  This is another dimension in which gender is relevant. It  has to be taken into account in the work  on performance etc. at regional and other structural levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovation in Public Services by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/44#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=44#comment-283</guid>
		<description>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET welcomes the focus on innovation in the public sector because this sector is so critical to women – as consumers and employees. Most of the arguments we have made in other sections of our commentary apply here too, including our comment with the German example about gender in research. Women’s talents must be nurtured and gender analysis brought to bear on problems and solutions. The work of NESTA and others should include a well integrated gender perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET welcomes the focus on innovation in the public sector because this sector is so critical to women – as consumers and employees. Most of the arguments we have made in other sections of our commentary apply here too, including our comment with the German example about gender in research. Women’s talents must be nurtured and gender analysis brought to bear on problems and solutions. The work of NESTA and others should include a well integrated gender perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative People by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/43#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=43#comment-282</guid>
		<description>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET agrees that upskilling is needed, at every level and across the board. All education and employment initiatives and practices need to address gender inequality. There are still some severe disparities. However while women can be very successful in STEM, there are still problems with the proportions of women taking STEM subjects and going on to employment in STEM. (see UKRC’s submission to the DIUS consultation on the future demand for STEM skills. Some proportions are worsening as the TUC report on apprenticeships has recently shown. Gender segregation is worse in vocational areas and in FE.  All this needs to be taken account of through a radical gender mainstreaming and positive action approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET agrees that upskilling is needed, at every level and across the board. All education and employment initiatives and practices need to address gender inequality. There are still some severe disparities. However while women can be very successful in STEM, there are still problems with the proportions of women taking STEM subjects and going on to employment in STEM. (see UKRC’s submission to the DIUS consultation on the future demand for STEM skills. Some proportions are worsening as the TUC report on apprenticeships has recently shown. Gender segregation is worse in vocational areas and in FE.  All this needs to be taken account of through a radical gender mainstreaming and positive action approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative People by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/43#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=43#comment-281</guid>
		<description>The Innovation Nation is based on a nation of diverse men and women. UK Resource Centre for Women in SET has the evidence about women’s under utilization (our attrition data for instance) and is working, directly and through partners and collaborations to develop innovative (!) solutions. Women’s contribution is essential and this means we must all acknowledge barriers, do the gender analysis and make some deep culture changes to address discrimination and inequality.  The UK Resource Centre, the UK’s lead organisation on Women in SET, looks forward to offering its extensive expertise to ensure all talent is nurtured through positive action and genuine gender mainstreaming within policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Innovation Nation is based on a nation of diverse men and women. UK Resource Centre for Women in SET has the evidence about women’s under utilization (our attrition data for instance) and is working, directly and through partners and collaborations to develop innovative (!) solutions. Women’s contribution is essential and this means we must all acknowledge barriers, do the gender analysis and make some deep culture changes to address discrimination and inequality.  The UK Resource Centre, the UK’s lead organisation on Women in SET, looks forward to offering its extensive expertise to ensure all talent is nurtured through positive action and genuine gender mainstreaming within policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The changing face of Innovation by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/37#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=37#comment-280</guid>
		<description>quite a long comment here!  
The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET argues that one critical way to improve the innovation potential of the UK would be to incorporate a better understanding of gender to create better research and development.

We offer an example of the ways technology impacts on women and men differently, from Germany, based on presentations and personal communications with M. Schraudner about Gender Aspects in Research - A Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Project sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Technology (Discover Gender).

This research programme asked if gender could be a success factor for research and innovations. It showed how the demographics mean that market users overall are becoming older, more female and more international. It reviewed a number of innovations – services and products (including: individual medicine, mobile phones, care robot, voice recognition system, heart attack, camera, software design, specialist trolley, Atomic Ski, airbag, cake mixes, pregnant dummy). 
The research analysed how some innovations pay more attention to gender than others. It argued that failure to attend to gender issues sometimes led to problems with the products or a failure to identify issues that impact on women. As a result there were failures in the effectiveness of the technologies or theories. 
The research promoted the importance of considering gender and diversity but avoiding stereotyping. A good understanding gender differences and similarities is needed, which recognises that these differences can be socially constructed. 

The German research proposes that: 

• gender can be a driver for the adaptation of existing products and services for new users; 

• gender can provide a focus for the development of new technological developments 

• gender can be used in the identification of contexts of use of technology and used within product and services development 


• A growing interest in a gender analysis in mainstream research includes attention by several German universities relating to the ELITE Program 

More information in our original submission for Innovation Nation on our website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite a long comment here!<br />
The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET argues that one critical way to improve the innovation potential of the UK would be to incorporate a better understanding of gender to create better research and development.</p>
<p>We offer an example of the ways technology impacts on women and men differently, from Germany, based on presentations and personal communications with M. Schraudner about Gender Aspects in Research - A Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Project sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Technology (Discover Gender).</p>
<p>This research programme asked if gender could be a success factor for research and innovations. It showed how the demographics mean that market users overall are becoming older, more female and more international. It reviewed a number of innovations – services and products (including: individual medicine, mobile phones, care robot, voice recognition system, heart attack, camera, software design, specialist trolley, Atomic Ski, airbag, cake mixes, pregnant dummy).<br />
The research analysed how some innovations pay more attention to gender than others. It argued that failure to attend to gender issues sometimes led to problems with the products or a failure to identify issues that impact on women. As a result there were failures in the effectiveness of the technologies or theories.<br />
The research promoted the importance of considering gender and diversity but avoiding stereotyping. A good understanding gender differences and similarities is needed, which recognises that these differences can be socially constructed. </p>
<p>The German research proposes that: </p>
<p>• gender can be a driver for the adaptation of existing products and services for new users; </p>
<p>• gender can provide a focus for the development of new technological developments </p>
<p>• gender can be used in the identification of contexts of use of technology and used within product and services development </p>
<p>• A growing interest in a gender analysis in mainstream research includes attention by several German universities relating to the ELITE Program </p>
<p>More information in our original submission for Innovation Nation on our website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Strong and Innovative Research Base by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/41#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=41#comment-279</guid>
		<description>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET works with the RCUK (through its Research Careers and Diversity Unit) to promote and support best practice within the scientific research workforce. This includes action on women’s retention and progression and ensuring that advice and guidance on research careers encourages the recruitment and retention of women in SET careers.  UK Resource Centre’s work with Research Councils in SET involves approaches like our cultural analysis tool, the Athena Swan Charter (a scheme which recognises excellence in Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) employment for women in higher education and research), and developing bursary schemes for returners. 

The new Concordat for the Career Management of Researchers also provides an effective tool to support good practice in the management of early career stage researchers.

Women as a group have atypical career paths but can still achieve excellence in science research. However, research value and scientific excellence should be judged by an appropriate range of skills and factors, including science communication and public engagement (sometimes strengths women have), alongside traditional definitions of excellence.  This is particularly relevant to innovation potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK Resource Centre for Women in SET works with the RCUK (through its Research Careers and Diversity Unit) to promote and support best practice within the scientific research workforce. This includes action on women’s retention and progression and ensuring that advice and guidance on research careers encourages the recruitment and retention of women in SET careers.  UK Resource Centre’s work with Research Councils in SET involves approaches like our cultural analysis tool, the Athena Swan Charter (a scheme which recognises excellence in Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) employment for women in higher education and research), and developing bursary schemes for returners. </p>
<p>The new Concordat for the Career Management of Researchers also provides an effective tool to support good practice in the management of early career stage researchers.</p>
<p>Women as a group have atypical career paths but can still achieve excellence in science research. However, research value and scientific excellence should be judged by an appropriate range of skills and factors, including science communication and public engagement (sometimes strengths women have), alongside traditional definitions of excellence.  This is particularly relevant to innovation potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supporting Business Innovation by Marion Scott</title>
		<link>http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/innovationnation/archives/40#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideaspace.org.uk/innovationnation/?p=40#comment-278</guid>
		<description>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET argues that women are key providers and consumers in many service sectors – how do the frameworks and enabling structures and processes recognize this?  If, as we know, women are underrepresented in senior management, in specific sectors including SET, in decision making and on boards, how can business address the deficit?  We work with SET employers on solutions to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK Resource Centre for Women in SET argues that women are key providers and consumers in many service sectors – how do the frameworks and enabling structures and processes recognize this?  If, as we know, women are underrepresented in senior management, in specific sectors including SET, in decision making and on boards, how can business address the deficit?  We work with SET employers on solutions to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
