Comments for Intellectual Intercourse

Comment on Symantec wins $3.1 million default judgment by R V

R V — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:31:55 +0000

I have been working with Fare Portal for several years now and know for certain that Sam Jain and FarePortal is straightforward with ethical principles and can always be trusted for sure. Any other comments are unreasonable and to be disregarded.

Comment on Listrak sends me spam for the American Medical Association by DB Cooper

DB Cooper — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:47:43 +0000

Used to work there. Can tell you for a fact you’re only scratching the surface of some of the dirty stuff that goes on there.

Comment on Multiplying Goalposts by Defining Spam – four ways | EmailKarma.net

Defining Spam – four ways | EmailKarma.net — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:42:04 +0000

[...] to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box WordPress PluginMickey, ran this article today on the definitions of spam (as used by various anti-spammers), prompted by an ongoing discussion [...]

Comment on Web Marketing 101: Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? — Please? by It’s not ok! Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? | EmailKarma.net

It’s not ok! Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? | EmailKarma.net — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:36:21 +0000

[...] over at ‘No man is an iland’ ran this story this morning, mentioning several delivery experts that made comments on a blog post by Kevin Stirtz, on September 13th, about sending unsolicited [...]

Comment on Shifman Consulting Dead by Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:29:40 +0000

I wonder where he is now. I wonder what (whether) he has learned from this? I would be interested in hearing from him. I kind of feel sorry for him. I mean, he was wrong. He kept upping the ante when he had no hand. It would have been much smarter if he had just apologized and moved on. I am guessing he has had to change his name…

Comment on Tag44: Spamming for jobs by bob

bob — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 19:21:52 +0000

they are big time spammers.

Comment on Do you want to fund the lawsuit? by Giving Email a Black Eye : : EmailKarma.net

Giving Email a Black Eye : : EmailKarma.net — Fri, 21 May 2010 03:18:08 +0000

[...] practices I highly recommend you review them right now and get in line, or as Mickey says “Do you want to fund the lawsuit?“. C-27 is coming and these practices are in a direct violation of the [...]

Comment on Multiplying Goalposts by Defining Spam – four ways : : EmailKarma.net

Defining Spam – four ways : : EmailKarma.net — Fri, 21 May 2010 03:02:40 +0000

[...] ran this article today on the definitions of spam (as used by various anti-spammers), prompted by an ongoing discussion [...]

Comment on Web Marketing 101: Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? — Please? by It’s not ok! Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? : : EmailKarma.net

It’s not ok! Will the Real Spam Please Stand Up? : : EmailKarma.net — Fri, 21 May 2010 03:00:45 +0000

Comment on It’s unfortunate by danielle Legrand

danielle Legrand — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:39:55 +0000

I received my "bequest notification "fromRev.Fr. CHARLES ELLIOT c.elliot2@btinternet.com and the contact information of my devoted lawyerinformation are John Edward Esq
e.mail: esq.johnedwardesq@yahoo.co.uk