<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jere's Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://jeremdow.com</link>
	<description>Google, Games, Drupal, Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:08:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForJeresBlog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="commentsforjeresblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS is a bootable browser, the web is the OS by Marc Henessy</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2009/07/10/google-chrome-os-is-a-bootable-browser-the-web-is-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Henessy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=333#comment-309</guid>
		<description>i installed Chrome OS on two of my netbooks.                      the Chrome OS works great and its loading time is very fast too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i installed Chrome OS on two of my netbooks.                      the Chrome OS works great and its loading time is very fast too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One more Chrome OS post by Mike</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2009/07/11/one-more-chrome-os-post/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=387#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Chrome OS is just another rebranded Linux GUI, it would be much better if Google came up with an OS that would directly compete with Windows. 

        o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome OS is just another rebranded Linux GUI, it would be much better if Google came up with an OS that would directly compete with Windows. </p>
<p>        o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One more Chrome OS post by Techno Girl 22</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2009/07/11/one-more-chrome-os-post/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Techno Girl 22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=387#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I have installed Chrome OS on one of my netbooks and the performance of Chrome OS is just okay. there is nothing fancy or very special about it. It was just a sort of GUI version of linux or something.
                                              .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have installed Chrome OS on one of my netbooks and the performance of Chrome OS is just okay. there is nothing fancy or very special about it. It was just a sort of GUI version of linux or something.<br />
                                              .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome OS is a bootable browser, the web is the OS by arthritistreatment_boy</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2009/07/10/google-chrome-os-is-a-bootable-browser-the-web-is-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>arthritistreatment_boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=333#comment-292</guid>
		<description>with the release of Google Chrome and Microsoft Bing search engine, one would expect that there would be a very stiff competition between Google and Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the release of Google Chrome and Microsoft Bing search engine, one would expect that there would be a very stiff competition between Google and Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Spreadsheets – Surprise! by Jere</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/06/06/google-spreadsheets-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=68#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Does this seem broken to anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this seem broken to anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IGN – A Credit Card Leaching Honey Trap of Death by Matt Coff</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/04/08/ign-credit-card-leaching-honey-trap-of/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Coff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=37#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Noooo 77466  way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo 77466  way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jere’s Blog poses for a picture… by Brian Baute</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/05/29/jeres-blog-poses-for-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=65#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The One Thousand Paintings project is brilliant and reminds me a lot of the &lt;a HREF="http://www.2000bricks.com" REL="nofollow"&gt;2000Bricks&lt;/a&gt; project, which is also starting to take off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The One Thousand Paintings project is brilliant and reminds me a lot of the <a HREF="http://www.2000bricks.com" REL="nofollow">2000Bricks</a> project, which is also starting to take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advideo? by Jere</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/05/26/advideo/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=62#comment-5</guid>
		<description>While not quite so worked up about it as you, I do agree with you, Jesse, in terms of Google not effectively promoting their products.  In fact, I have a post in the works about it now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But remember, Google has been under significant pressure from investors not to become "just another portal" or to over-emphasize itself as a media or advertising company - the impression of a "technology company" solely devoted (or 70% of the time, anyway) to search - was very important back in the IPO days - and has played a big role in Google's stock performance.  Judging by Schmidt's remarks at the press day earlier this month, you can see that this still guides his PR strategy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I'm more inclined to agree with you, that many of these concerns are much less valid today than they were back in 2004, and will become less and less important as the company continues to grow.  Despite some predictions to the contrary, the search portal seems to be one mainstay of Web 1.0 that's not going anywhere anytime soon, and if Yahoo can teach us anything, it's that people love a one-stop-shop, often times even if they can find better stand-alone services elsewhere.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google needs to adapt to this - yes, they need to redesign the homepage - yes, they need to act (more) like a portal - at least on the surface - or you're right, they will never see gains in any of their portal-esque products - even other search types.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That said, I personally believe much of this is already in the works, it’s just a matter of timing - I'm going to try my hand at some predictions in my next post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not quite so worked up about it as you, I do agree with you, Jesse, in terms of Google not effectively promoting their products.  In fact, I have a post in the works about it now.</p>
<p>But remember, Google has been under significant pressure from investors not to become &#8220;just another portal&#8221; or to over-emphasize itself as a media or advertising company &#8211; the impression of a &#8220;technology company&#8221; solely devoted (or 70% of the time, anyway) to search &#8211; was very important back in the IPO days &#8211; and has played a big role in Google&#8217;s stock performance.  Judging by Schmidt&#8217;s remarks at the press day earlier this month, you can see that this still guides his PR strategy.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m more inclined to agree with you, that many of these concerns are much less valid today than they were back in 2004, and will become less and less important as the company continues to grow.  Despite some predictions to the contrary, the search portal seems to be one mainstay of Web 1.0 that&#8217;s not going anywhere anytime soon, and if Yahoo can teach us anything, it&#8217;s that people love a one-stop-shop, often times even if they can find better stand-alone services elsewhere.</p>
<p>Google needs to adapt to this &#8211; yes, they need to redesign the homepage &#8211; yes, they need to act (more) like a portal &#8211; at least on the surface &#8211; or you&#8217;re right, they will never see gains in any of their portal-esque products &#8211; even other search types.</p>
<p>That said, I personally believe much of this is already in the works, it’s just a matter of timing &#8211; I&#8217;m going to try my hand at some predictions in my next post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advideo? by Jesse</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/05/26/advideo/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=62#comment-4</guid>
		<description>At this point I've stopped believing that anyone is at the wheel (or even on the bridge for that matter) at Google.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Case in point: Google Video Search.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google (the page) keeps most of it's interesting content in a virtual "creepy back room" accessible only by clicking on the "more" link.  Froogle is not number one, Video Search is not number one, etc all because their "perpetual beta" mindset won't let them put the new good stuff on the front page.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I hate Google in almost every way, but here's a hand out guys: Take a page from Yahoo and Microsoft's playbook.  Advertise every piece of crap you make, regardless.  Microsoft Live is a steaming pile that was probably put together by an intern in the Atlas office; BUT IT WAS ON THE MSN MAIN PAGE...FRONT AND CENTER...FOR A MONTH!  Look at Yahoo, their main page looks like a shut-in's living room.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;STOP HIDING YOUR PRODUCTS YOU GEEKY, SENSITIVE, INTROVERTED WIERDOS.  SOMEONE ELSE WROTE A BOOK ABOUT YOUR VISION!  IT TAKES BLOGGERS TO SPREAD WORD OF MOUTH ABOUT YOUR SERVICES! FUCK!!!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rant aside: Video AdSense is just a logical next step for them to take.  We may even see contextual "blank" the "blank" banner ads before the month is out.  With one piece of resuable, billable code, google will be able to determine if you most wish to "Punch" the "Politician" or "Shoot" the "Monkey/Penguin/Deer".  Each banner ad that surfers encounter will be more enticing than the next until your ever waking second is consumed by the need to "blank" the thing you hate most with the possiblity of winning that elusive new Xbox 360 as an added bonus.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm not going to consider any AdSense product truly new any more.  These variants are just natural evolutions.  The only AdSense news I'm keeping my eyes open for is the emergence of a serious competitor that actual specializes in Marketing.  AdSense is just a Brin dropping that happened to be profitable...with a real marketing visionary (self promoting and all) at the helm of a distributed ad network we might see minority report style cool/invasivness before we die of old age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I&#8217;ve stopped believing that anyone is at the wheel (or even on the bridge for that matter) at Google.</p>
<p>Case in point: Google Video Search.</p>
<p>Google (the page) keeps most of it&#8217;s interesting content in a virtual &#8220;creepy back room&#8221; accessible only by clicking on the &#8220;more&#8221; link.  Froogle is not number one, Video Search is not number one, etc all because their &#8220;perpetual beta&#8221; mindset won&#8217;t let them put the new good stuff on the front page.</p>
<p>I hate Google in almost every way, but here&#8217;s a hand out guys: Take a page from Yahoo and Microsoft&#8217;s playbook.  Advertise every piece of crap you make, regardless.  Microsoft Live is a steaming pile that was probably put together by an intern in the Atlas office; BUT IT WAS ON THE MSN MAIN PAGE&#8230;FRONT AND CENTER&#8230;FOR A MONTH!  Look at Yahoo, their main page looks like a shut-in&#8217;s living room.</p>
<p>STOP HIDING YOUR PRODUCTS YOU GEEKY, SENSITIVE, INTROVERTED WIERDOS.  SOMEONE ELSE WROTE A BOOK ABOUT YOUR VISION!  IT TAKES BLOGGERS TO SPREAD WORD OF MOUTH ABOUT YOUR SERVICES! FUCK!!!</p>
<p>Rant aside: Video AdSense is just a logical next step for them to take.  We may even see contextual &#8220;blank&#8221; the &#8220;blank&#8221; banner ads before the month is out.  With one piece of resuable, billable code, google will be able to determine if you most wish to &#8220;Punch&#8221; the &#8220;Politician&#8221; or &#8220;Shoot&#8221; the &#8220;Monkey/Penguin/Deer&#8221;.  Each banner ad that surfers encounter will be more enticing than the next until your ever waking second is consumed by the need to &#8220;blank&#8221; the thing you hate most with the possiblity of winning that elusive new Xbox 360 as an added bonus.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to consider any AdSense product truly new any more.  These variants are just natural evolutions.  The only AdSense news I&#8217;m keeping my eyes open for is the emergence of a serious competitor that actual specializes in Marketing.  AdSense is just a Brin dropping that happened to be profitable&#8230;with a real marketing visionary (self promoting and all) at the helm of a distributed ad network we might see minority report style cool/invasivness before we die of old age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to Jere’s Blog by Jere</title>
		<link>http://jeremdow.com/2006/03/08/welcome-to-jeres-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremdow.com/?p=18#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF="http://jere-blog.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow"&gt;Jere's Blog&lt;/a&gt; finally has a new look.  Hope you like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://jere-blog.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">Jere&#8217;s Blog</a> finally has a new look.  Hope you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.169 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-04 09:24:36 -->
