Comments for Administrative Law

Comment on An Empirical Window into Retrospective Review by Code Violet

Code Violet — Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:32:41 +0000

The depth here is impressive. Most guides just skim the surface of link velocity, but your point about “natural variance” hits the nail on the head. It’s exactly what we preach to our clients.

Comment on Why Energy Companies Must Use the Power of Eminent Domain by Lisa Lanza

Lisa Lanza — Sat, 27 Sep 2025 12:03:31 +0000

In reply to Rom De Guzman (Hover). And on the case that a city government wants to use eminent domain to take over the power lines that are owned by a private electric company? Could a city do that?

Comment on Viewing the Arbitrary and Capricious Test as a Set of Function-Specific Criteria by Alphonse dichter

Alphonse dichter — Fri, 08 Aug 2025 11:38:22 +0000

Paragraph writing is also a fun, if you know then you can write if not it iss complicated to write.

Comment on Shifting Attention to Internal Administrative Law in the States by Joel Mintz

Joel Mintz — Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:27:03 +0000

Thanks for letting me know about this book. I’m looking forward to reading it!

Comment on Re-theorizing Administrative Law in the Great Unsettling by William A. Edmundson

William A. Edmundson — Mon, 02 Jun 2025 15:20:06 +0000

Cohen’s compelling account is worth everyone’s time.

Comment on The “Phantom Public” Exposed and Transformed by Criminal Immigration Attorney in New York and New Jersey

Criminal Immigration Attorney in New York and New Jersey — Thu, 01 May 2025 13:16:05 +0000

Thank you for this insightful article on “The Phantom Public: Exposed and Transformed.” I particularly appreciated your exploration of how the concept of the public has evolved in the context of digital communication and media. Building on your discussion, it’s worth noting the impact of social media on the perception and roles of the public in shaping discourse. For example, platforms like Twitter and Reddit have democratized information sharing, allowing previously marginalized voices to influence public opinion. This has led to emergent phenomena such as “cancel culture,” where collective actions can swiftly mobilize and change social narratives, further complicating the traditional notion of a singular public. Additionally, it might be interesting to examine how algorithms on these platforms also shape public engagement, often creating echo chambers that can distort perceptions of consensus. This duality of empowerment and division highlights a transformed public that is both more powerful and fragmented than ever before. How do you think these new dynamics will affect future legal frameworks surrounding public discourse, especially regarding issues of accountability and representation?

Comment on Why Energy Companies Must Use the Power of Eminent Domain by Rom De Guzman (Hover)

Rom De Guzman (Hover) — Thu, 23 Nov 2023 02:54:28 +0000

In reply to Rom De Guzman (Hover). Owners of the land

Comment on Why Energy Companies Must Use the Power of Eminent Domain by Rom De Guzman (Hover)

Rom De Guzman (Hover) — Thu, 23 Nov 2023 02:53:27 +0000

Do the owners of the kand get compensation for this eminent domain?

Comment on Agency Capacity by richard j pierce jr

richard j pierce jr — Sat, 28 Oct 2023 01:27:22 +0000

This is the best Jotwell review I have ever read. It forces me to read the article.

Comment on Confused Merger Policy at the FTC by D. Daniel Sokol

D. Daniel Sokol — Thu, 25 May 2023 15:58:06 +0000

Dick, thank you so much for your careful read of the work. I think that (nearly) everyone believes in the need for strong antitrust enforcement. The problem that we have is that when new leadership comes in and does not have a good sense of the institution, its history, and the various ecosystem, it puts the FTC under considerable pressure and leads to a number of unforced errors. Another issue is that none of the three current commissioners have a law practice background and so this means that realities of practice are only understood through interlocutors – some of whom are better than others. With historic levels of turnover at the FTC and lots of particularly strong senior managers leaving, it makes effecting change that can survive court scrutiny more challenging. The overall breakdown of trust between the practitioner community and the agencies is particularly strong and that trust is important for a well functioning system. Without it, you lose transparency and matters get challenged with regard not merely as to substance but as to process.