<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Market Urbanism</title>
	
	<link>http://marketurbanism.com</link>
	<description>Urbanism for Capitalists / Capitalism for Urbanists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForMarketUrbanism" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="commentsformarketurbanism" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on NY Gov. Patterson’s Rent-Stabilized Apartment in Harlem by Manhattan Rental Expert</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/05/16/new-yorks-governor-patterson-lives-in-a-rent-stabilized-apartment/#comment-6650</link>
		<dc:creator>Manhattan Rental Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=45#comment-6650</guid>
		<description>You make a very good point. It isn't fair for Governor Paterson to be taking advantage of the rent control of NYC. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;___________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.luxuryrentalsmanhattan.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; Manhattan Rental Expert &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a very good point. It isn&#39;t fair for Governor Paterson to be taking advantage of the rent control of NYC. </p>
<p>___________________________________<br /><a href="http://www.luxuryrentalsmanhattan.com" rel="nofollow"> Manhattan Rental Expert </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rothbard the Urbanist Part 5: Diversity and Discrimination by MarketUrbanism</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2009/08/25/rothbard-the-urbanist-part-5-diversity-and-discrimination/#comment-6651</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketUrbanism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=1152#comment-6651</guid>
		<description>Last I checked, no previews...&lt;br&gt;It would be a great feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I checked, no previews&#8230;<br />It would be a great feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama’s genius high-speed rail plan by Talk about two left feet… « Notes From Babel</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2009/12/23/obamas-genius-high-speed-rail-plan/#comment-6649</link>
		<dc:creator>Talk about two left feet… « Notes From Babel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/2009/12/23/obamas-genius-high-speed-rail-plan/#comment-6649</guid>
		<description>[...] a comment »  From Market Urbanism.  Note the last line—I was thinking exactly the same thing: Just in case you were under the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment &raquo;  From Market Urbanism.  Note the last line&#8212;I was thinking exactly the same thing: Just in case you were under the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LA’s partial parking privatization by cushion</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2010/02/03/las-partial-parking-privatization/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator>cushion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=1280#comment-6648</guid>
		<description>brilliant blog! I also love to write about economics, please visit my blog &lt;a href="http://www.windowsillseat.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.windowsillseat.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; and follow me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant blog! I also love to write about economics, please visit my blog <a href="http://www.windowsillseat.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.windowsillseat.blogspot.com</a> and follow me <img src='http://marketurbanism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Urban[ism] Legend: Gas Taxes and Fees Cover All Costs of Road Use by Light Rail - Phoenix area - Arizona (AZ) - Page 22 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2008/07/30/urbanism-legend-gas-taxes-covers-all-costs-of-road-use/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator>Light Rail - Phoenix area - Arizona (AZ) - Page 22 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=131#comment-6646</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, in Houston, the 15 miles of SH 99 from I-10 to US 290 will cost $1 billion to build and maintain over its lifetime, while only generating $162 million in gas taxes. That gives a tax gap ratio of .16, which means that the real gas tax rate people would need to pay on this segment of road to completely pay for it would be $2.22 per gallon.    Austin Contrarian: Do roads pay for themselves?  Vaporizing the Gas Tax Myth | Planetizen  Urban[ism] Legend: Gas Taxes and Fees Cover All Costs of Road Use | Market Urbanism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, in Houston, the 15 miles of SH 99 from I-10 to US 290 will cost $1 billion to build and maintain over its lifetime, while only generating $162 million in gas taxes. That gives a tax gap ratio of .16, which means that the real gas tax rate people would need to pay on this segment of road to completely pay for it would be $2.22 per gallon.    Austin Contrarian: Do roads pay for themselves?  Vaporizing the Gas Tax Myth | Planetizen  Urban[ism] Legend: Gas Taxes and Fees Cover All Costs of Road Use | Market Urbanism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Urbanists: “We Are All O’Tooles Now” by rent_a_car</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2009/08/31/hsr-urbanists-we-are-all-otooles-now/#comment-6644</link>
		<dc:creator>rent_a_car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=1223#comment-6644</guid>
		<description>This is very useful indeed. The alternative would be to use sprees...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inchirieri-auto.net" rel="nofollow"&gt; Rent a car Romania &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very useful indeed. The alternative would be to use sprees&#8230;<br /><a href="http://www.inchirieri-auto.net" rel="nofollow"> Rent a car Romania </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rothbard the Urbanist Part 5: Diversity and Discrimination by zepfanman</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2009/08/25/rothbard-the-urbanist-part-5-diversity-and-discrimination/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>zepfanman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/?p=1152#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Did you ever find out about previews? I went ahead and requested the feature here: &lt;a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/is_there_a_possibility_of_comment_previews_in_the_future" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/is_the...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever find out about previews? I went ahead and requested the feature here: <a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/is_there_a_possibility_of_comment_previews_in_the_future" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/is_the.." rel="nofollow">http://getsatisfaction.com/disqus/topics/is_the..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amtrak’s utter incompetence by David Gunn</title>
		<link>http://marketurbanism.com/2009/12/30/amtraks-utter-incompetence/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketurbanism.com/2009/12/30/amtraks-utter-incompetence/#comment-6641</guid>
		<description>It is not unconscionable - the lack of wifi on the NEC trains so far is a function of the fact they travel under power wires, called catenary, that carry over 10,000 volts and generate enormous amounts of electromagnetic interference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While many passengers have some success with broadband cards and cell tethering, these solutions suffer from spotty coverage and rely on a technology not tuned for 100 mph+ hand-offs from one cell to another. Amtrak has worked with a number of first-tier vendors who have taken, literally, years to develop a solution that is economic to field.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Current Amtrak plans suggest the test systems on a few of the 20 Acela trains will be available fleet-wide by March 2010.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The viability of wifi on these trains is not a function of the cost of a ticket. One can buy a used car, and a Verizon Mifi, and have mobile internet, but that does not create a useful solution for trains carrying more than 300 passengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not unconscionable &#8211; the lack of wifi on the NEC trains so far is a function of the fact they travel under power wires, called catenary, that carry over 10,000 volts and generate enormous amounts of electromagnetic interference.</p>
<p>While many passengers have some success with broadband cards and cell tethering, these solutions suffer from spotty coverage and rely on a technology not tuned for 100 mph+ hand-offs from one cell to another. Amtrak has worked with a number of first-tier vendors who have taken, literally, years to develop a solution that is economic to field.</p>
<p>Current Amtrak plans suggest the test systems on a few of the 20 Acela trains will be available fleet-wide by March 2010.</p>
<p>The viability of wifi on these trains is not a function of the cost of a ticket. One can buy a used car, and a Verizon Mifi, and have mobile internet, but that does not create a useful solution for trains carrying more than 300 passengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.737 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-03 23:12:10 -->
