<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Microsoft Confidential</title>
	
	<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com</link>
	<description>News, views and reviews on Microsoft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:39:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForMicrosoftConfidential" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft press releases by Rubber Republic - News</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubber Republic - News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati ranking might suffer. You weren’t playing by the rules. You were a nasty sneaky dirty link-blogger who would undermine the revolution, and you probably used Windows, and Photo Bucket not Flickr, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati ranking might suffer. You weren&#8217;t playing by the rules. You were a nasty sneaky dirty link-blogger who would undermine the revolution, and you probably used Windows, and Photo Bucket not Flickr, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft press releases by We Are Team Rubber » One of about five thoughts on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>We Are Team Rubber » One of about five thoughts on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati ranking might suffer. You weren’t playing by the rules. You were a nasty sneaky dirty link-blogger who would undermine the revolution, and you probably used Windows, and Photo Bucket not Flickr, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati ranking might suffer. You weren&#8217;t playing by the rules. You were a nasty sneaky dirty link-blogger who would undermine the revolution, and you probably used Windows, and Photo Bucket not Flickr, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft share price by moz</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/20/microsoft-share-price-2/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/20/microsoft-share-price-2/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>good work mate. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good work mate. <img src='http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Browsers get hacked by Microsoft Paladin – Automated Vulnerability Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/23/when-browsers-get-hacked/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Paladin – Automated Vulnerability Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/23/when-browsers-get-hacked/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] timely response to threats is exactly what’s needed (see our last post), and this technology sounds like a step in the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] timely response to threats is exactly what&#8217;s needed (see our last post), and this technology sounds like a step in the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing the new Silverlight 3.0 Ad Fest by GoldenTao</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/21/announcing-the-new-silverlight-30-ad-fest/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldenTao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2009/03/21/announcing-the-new-silverlight-30-ad-fest/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>typo.  LIFT is usually spelt with a T :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typo.  LIFT is usually spelt with a T <img src='http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2008 1.1 Petabyte database by Andrew Fryer</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fryer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Guys, 
Filestream in SQL Swerver 2008 means that these files could be part of the database (for backup and transactions) but remain as physicakl files (for streaming for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,<br />
Filestream in SQL Swerver 2008 means that these files could be part of the database (for backup and transactions) but remain as physicakl files (for streaming for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2008 1.1 Petabyte database by brad</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>It's very possible that image data could be directly stored in the SQL database -- would make sense, architecturally. I've seen it done before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very possible that image data could be directly stored in the SQL database &#8212; would make sense, architecturally. I&#8217;ve seen it done before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SQL Server 2008 1.1 Petabyte database by dacree</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>dacree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/07/sql-server-2008-11-petabyte-database/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Surely you don't think this SQL database will be in the petabyte range. The image data may very well reach a petabyte or more, but the SQL database itself should be quite small.
SQL tables will not be storing images but rather image related data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely you don&#8217;t think this SQL database will be in the petabyte range. The image data may very well reach a petabyte or more, but the SQL database itself should be quite small.<br />
SQL tables will not be storing images but rather image related data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gates on the economy by piroman</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/16/gates-on-the-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>piroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/16/gates-on-the-economy/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>As if Bill could care about it maybe he can bayle eweryone out and sprinkle some magic fairy pixie dust and click his heels three times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if Bill could care about it maybe he can bayle eweryone out and sprinkle some magic fairy pixie dust and click his heels three times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft press releases by Microsoft PressPass shite</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft PressPass shite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/04/microsoft-press-releases/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] on from our previous post on using Microsoft press releases, comes an example of how sometimes the PR cronies really miss the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on from our previous post on using Microsoft press releases, comes an example of how sometimes the PR cronies really miss the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 by Windows Embeded ‘Quebec’</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/14/windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Embeded ‘Quebec’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/14/windows-7/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] comes the news about the next version of Windows Embedded being built on Windows 7 (Windows 7 of course being the code name for, um, Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comes the news about the next version of Windows Embedded being built on Windows 7 (Windows 7 of course being the code name for, um, Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SPARKS will Fly challenge by Windows Embeded ‘Quebec’</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/03/sparks-will-fly-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Embeded ‘Quebec’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/11/03/sparks-will-fly-challenge/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] continuing the previous discussion on Windows Embedded comes the news about the next version of Windows Embedded being built on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continuing the previous discussion on Windows Embedded comes the news about the next version of Windows Embedded being built on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .NET Micro Framework competition by SPARKS will Fly challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/10/net-micro-framework-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>SPARKS will Fly challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/10/net-micro-framework-competition/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] we recently posted, the .NET Micro Framework marketing hacks have their Dare to Dream Different challenge, and now the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we recently posted, the .NET Micro Framework marketing hacks have their Dare to Dream Different challenge, and now the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Microsoft .NET logo… and Strata by .NET Micro Framework V3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/25/new-microsoft-net-logo-and-strata/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>.NET Micro Framework V3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/25/new-microsoft-net-logo-and-strata/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] But you’ll notice the logo hasn’t changed - we can only guess it wasn’t important enough to get the new wave logo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But you&#8217;ll notice the logo hasn&#8217;t changed &#8211; we can only guess it wasn&#8217;t important enough to get the new wave logo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .NET Micro Framework competition by .NET Micro Framework V3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/10/net-micro-framework-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>.NET Micro Framework V3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microsoftconfidential.com/2008/10/10/net-micro-framework-competition/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] latest version of the .NET Micro Framework slipped out early last week (we’ve previously praised the Dare to Dream Different competition on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latest version of the .NET Micro Framework slipped out early last week (we&#8217;ve previously praised the Dare to Dream Different competition on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
