<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MingCampbell.org.uk</title>
	
	<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk</link>
	<description>Sir Menzies Campbell MP, Member of Parliament for North East Fife</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForMingCampbell" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on CAMPBELL COMMENTS ON PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN SPEECH by Tweets that mention CAMPBELL COMMENTS ON PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN SPEECH | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/11/06/campbell-comments-on-prime-minister%e2%80%99s-afghanistan-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-36382</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention CAMPBELL COMMENTS ON PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN SPEECH | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=786#comment-36382</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, SHIP for Peace. SHIP for Peace said: RT @mingcampbell: CAMPBELL COMMENTS ON PM'S AFGHAN SPEECH: Commenting on the Prime Minister’s speech today about ... http://bit.ly/33lNT1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, SHIP for Peace. SHIP for Peace said: RT @mingcampbell: CAMPBELL COMMENTS ON PM&#39;S AFGHAN SPEECH: Commenting on the Prime Minister’s speech today about &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/33lNT1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/33lNT1</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAMPBELL SIGNS UP TO 10:10 ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPAIGN by Tweets that mention CAMPBELL SIGNS UP TO 10:10 ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPAIGN | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/10/28/campbell-signs-up-to-1010-environmental-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-36381</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention CAMPBELL SIGNS UP TO 10:10 ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPAIGN | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=779#comment-36381</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Daniel Vockins, John Dodd. John Dodd said: CAMPBELL SIGNS UP TO 10:10 ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPAIGN: Sir Menzies Campbell has pledged his support to the environmental ... http://bit.ly/PWSct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Daniel Vockins, John Dodd. John Dodd said: CAMPBELL SIGNS UP TO 10:10 ENVIRONMENTAL CAMPAIGN: Sir Menzies Campbell has pledged his support to the environmental &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/PWSct" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/PWSct</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on "DISAPPOINTED AT LOSS OF LLOYDS TSB CHARITY FUNDING" - CAMPBELL by Tweets that mention “DISAPPOINTED AT LOSS OF LLOYDS TSB CHARITY FUNDING” - CAMPBELL | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/10/20/disappointed-at-loss-of-lloyds-tsb-charity-funding-campbell/comment-page-1/#comment-36380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention “DISAPPOINTED AT LOSS OF LLOYDS TSB CHARITY FUNDING” - CAMPBELL | MingCampbell.org.uk -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=768#comment-36380</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, East Fife FC. East Fife FC said: “DISAPPOINTED AT LOSS OF LLOYDS TSB CHARITY FUNDING” - CAMPBELL ...: North East Fife charities that have receiv.. http://bit.ly/1jsKoZ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, East Fife FC. East Fife FC said: “DISAPPOINTED AT LOSS OF LLOYDS TSB CHARITY FUNDING” - CAMPBELL &#8230;: North East Fife charities that have receiv.. <a href="http://bit.ly/1jsKoZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1jsKoZ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAMPBELL RESPONDS TO PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN STATEMENT by Tweets that mention CAMPBELL RESPONDS TO PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN STATEMENT | Sir Menzies Campbell MP -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/10/14/campbell-responds-to-prime-minister%e2%80%99s-afghanistan-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-36379</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention CAMPBELL RESPONDS TO PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN STATEMENT | Sir Menzies Campbell MP -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=752#comment-36379</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, John Dodd. John Dodd said: CAMPBELL RESPONDS TO PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN STATEMENT: Senior Liberal Democrat MP Sir Menzies Campbell q.. http://bit.ly/3DMbPp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Menzies Campbell, John Dodd. John Dodd said: CAMPBELL RESPONDS TO PRIME MINISTER’S AFGHANISTAN STATEMENT: Senior Liberal Democrat MP Sir Menzies Campbell q.. <a href="http://bit.ly/3DMbPp" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3DMbPp</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unemployment in North East Fife Rises 72% in Just Twelve Months – Campbell by Twitter Trackbacks for Unemployment in North East Fife Rises 72% in Just Twelve Months – Campbell | Sir Menzies Campbell MP [mingcampbell.org.uk] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/08/22/unemployment-in-north-east-fife-rises-72-in-just-twelve-months-%e2%80%93-campbell/comment-page-1/#comment-36378</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Unemployment in North East Fife Rises 72% in Just Twelve Months – Campbell | Sir Menzies Campbell MP [mingcampbell.org.uk] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=708#comment-36378</guid>
		<description>[...] Unemployment in North East Fife Rises 72% in Just Twelve Months – Campbell | Sir Menzies Campbell ...  www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/08/22/unemployment-in-north-east-fife-rises-72-in-just-twelve-months-%E2%80%93-campbell – view page – cached  Figures secured by North East Fife MP Sir Menzies Campbell show that the number of people claiming unemployment in the constituency in June 2009 has risen 72% — From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unemployment in North East Fife Rises 72% in Just Twelve Months – Campbell | Sir Menzies Campbell &#8230;  <a href="http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/08/22/unemployment-in-north-east-fife-rises-72-in-just-twelve-months-%E2%80%93-campbell" rel="nofollow">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/08/22/unemployment-in-north-east-fife-rises-72-in-just-twelve-months-%E2%80%93-campbell</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Figures secured by North East Fife MP Sir Menzies Campbell show that the number of people claiming unemployment in the constituency in June 2009 has risen 72% &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFICATION OF PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES by Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/05/12/clarification-of-parliamentary-allowances/comment-page-1/#comment-36356</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=503#comment-36356</guid>
		<description>Hi Ming, well this is your web page but you do not answer ???? perhaps it is now that possiby you might be the next speaker !!!.  But you fail to comment on this web site ??? perhaps as a possible speaker and as an MP for 22 years you should not run for this position as you have, however probably de-frauded us taxpayers all this time. However as per your quote's it is within the rules but they need to change ??? it took 22 years for you as a whiter than white liberal MP to work that out ?? It only took me and many others to  find out what  a two faced fraud you are. Still you may get another nice little earner as speaker. Please answer your critics as prior to this sham you did, still silence speaks many words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ming, well this is your web page but you do not answer ???? perhaps it is now that possiby you might be the next speaker !!!.  But you fail to comment on this web site ??? perhaps as a possible speaker and as an MP for 22 years you should not run for this position as you have, however probably de-frauded us taxpayers all this time. However as per your quote&#8217;s it is within the rules but they need to change ??? it took 22 years for you as a whiter than white liberal MP to work that out ?? It only took me and many others to  find out what  a two faced fraud you are. Still you may get another nice little earner as speaker. Please answer your critics as prior to this sham you did, still silence speaks many words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFICATION OF PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES by gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/05/12/clarification-of-parliamentary-allowances/comment-page-1/#comment-36352</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=503#comment-36352</guid>
		<description>Sir Menzies seems to be taking cover at the moment regarding his excessive expenses over the past few years. (eg £157,112 2007-2008) 
His constituents I,m sure are all waiting for him to justify these expenses. In fact to justify his position as an MP. 
While unemployment in NE Fife increases we have a greedy MP claiming for of all things food. Around £3500 during parliament recesses from Sept 2004 till August 2007. 
I think we all deserve answers or should you just resign in disgrace. 
On a broader matter why does this country need 647 MP,S when most of our regulations and laws come from the European parliament. The number should be reduced by at least half. The remainder might find some usefull work then and have less time to fiddle their expenses.  
Come on Ming have the guts to answer your critics and justify your existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Menzies seems to be taking cover at the moment regarding his excessive expenses over the past few years. (eg £157,112 2007-2008)<br />
His constituents I,m sure are all waiting for him to justify these expenses. In fact to justify his position as an MP.<br />
While unemployment in NE Fife increases we have a greedy MP claiming for of all things food. Around £3500 during parliament recesses from Sept 2004 till August 2007.<br />
I think we all deserve answers or should you just resign in disgrace.<br />
On a broader matter why does this country need 647 MP,S when most of our regulations and laws come from the European parliament. The number should be reduced by at least half. The remainder might find some usefull work then and have less time to fiddle their expenses.<br />
Come on Ming have the guts to answer your critics and justify your existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFICATION OF PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/05/12/clarification-of-parliamentary-allowances/comment-page-1/#comment-36351</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=503#comment-36351</guid>
		<description>mps on the take - what a shocker, who would have thought.... hardly news is it? Losing faith in politicians and politics? I never had any. 
Why not waste money on a fraud investigation only to find there's no case to answer? Reform the allowance system so they get even more money without having to claim it?
Politics isn't clever, it isn't complicated - it's largely pointless, from the ridiculous state opening of parliament to the inane pm questions. Lot's of people make money out of it - lobbyists, political correspondents reporting nothing, companies who offer directorships so they've got a voice in parliament.
It will never change, it will always be corrupt, so let's stop banging on about it, stop giving mps  media exposure - why should we be subjected to their odious nonsense? 
If I were an mp I'd be riding the gravy train all the way to the bank, claim every penny of allowance and make myself available for any remunerated directorship going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mps on the take - what a shocker, who would have thought&#8230;. hardly news is it? Losing faith in politicians and politics? I never had any.<br />
Why not waste money on a fraud investigation only to find there&#8217;s no case to answer? Reform the allowance system so they get even more money without having to claim it?<br />
Politics isn&#8217;t clever, it isn&#8217;t complicated - it&#8217;s largely pointless, from the ridiculous state opening of parliament to the inane pm questions. Lot&#8217;s of people make money out of it - lobbyists, political correspondents reporting nothing, companies who offer directorships so they&#8217;ve got a voice in parliament.<br />
It will never change, it will always be corrupt, so let&#8217;s stop banging on about it, stop giving mps  media exposure - why should we be subjected to their odious nonsense?<br />
If I were an mp I&#8217;d be riding the gravy train all the way to the bank, claim every penny of allowance and make myself available for any remunerated directorship going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFICATION OF PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES by Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/05/12/clarification-of-parliamentary-allowances/comment-page-1/#comment-36350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=503#comment-36350</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Campbell

While your own expenses might (possibly) be defended those of many of your colleagues cannot. In fact the range of expenses claimed by MPs only highlights the problem.

Even if your own expenses are minimal by claiming anything at all you supported a frankly indefensible situation. Basically a group of people paid from the public purse decided that as they probably could not get their 'Boss' (us, the electorate) to pay them more they would devise a system of allowances so that they could subsidise their wages on the quiet without the 'Boss' ever knowing. Even worse they took steps to make sure the 'Boss' could not find out. As you might then expect some MPs became more enthusiastic 'subsidisers' than others.

Given this situation do you honestly believe a few mumbled apologies about 'the system' and some guilt-edged checques will salvage MP's collective reputation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Campbell</p>
<p>While your own expenses might (possibly) be defended those of many of your colleagues cannot. In fact the range of expenses claimed by MPs only highlights the problem.</p>
<p>Even if your own expenses are minimal by claiming anything at all you supported a frankly indefensible situation. Basically a group of people paid from the public purse decided that as they probably could not get their &#8216;Boss&#8217; (us, the electorate) to pay them more they would devise a system of allowances so that they could subsidise their wages on the quiet without the &#8216;Boss&#8217; ever knowing. Even worse they took steps to make sure the &#8216;Boss&#8217; could not find out. As you might then expect some MPs became more enthusiastic &#8217;subsidisers&#8217; than others.</p>
<p>Given this situation do you honestly believe a few mumbled apologies about &#8216;the system&#8217; and some guilt-edged checques will salvage MP&#8217;s collective reputation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFICATION OF PARLIAMENTARY ALLOWANCES by Mike Turbine-Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2009/05/12/clarification-of-parliamentary-allowances/comment-page-1/#comment-36349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Turbine-Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?p=503#comment-36349</guid>
		<description>I'd like to ask "Ming" when he thinks he would have repaid the sum of £1,490.66 spent on an interior designer if the Telegraph hadn't published details of his expenses claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to ask &#8220;Ming&#8221; when he thinks he would have repaid the sum of £1,490.66 spent on an interior designer if the Telegraph hadn&#8217;t published details of his expenses claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
