<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Not As Good As The Book</title>
	
	<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com</link>
	<description>Reviews and Opinions about Books translated into Movies, Television, Games, Music, Art, Etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForNotAsGoodAsTheBook" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="commentsfornotasgoodasthebook" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Batman (1960′s TV Series) by Dalan Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/television/batman-1960s-tv-series/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalan Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=141#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Hate to break it to you, Lindsey, but DC's iterations of the Batman have been pretty regularly bad, with only a few high points (Dark Knight Returns). For my money, the best, most consistent incarnation of the world's greatest detective was the short-lived "Batman: The Animated Series" (1992-1995) -- a TV show. *BAM* I said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to break it to you, Lindsey, but DC&#8217;s iterations of the Batman have been pretty regularly bad, with only a few high points (Dark Knight Returns). For my money, the best, most consistent incarnation of the world&#8217;s greatest detective was the short-lived &#8220;Batman: The Animated Series&#8221; (1992-1995) &#8212; a TV show. *BAM* I said it.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jVEtJ2LNQqsnEFwvTe_84iutRTk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jVEtJ2LNQqsnEFwvTe_84iutRTk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jVEtJ2LNQqsnEFwvTe_84iutRTk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jVEtJ2LNQqsnEFwvTe_84iutRTk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Batman (1960′s TV Series) by Maggie Boise</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/television/batman-1960s-tv-series/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Boise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=141#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Remember, in the 50's and 60's television was still a really new means of entertainment and we were also dealing with a couple of wars and a huge social revolution.  

The costumes and interpretations of the comic had a lot to do with what the "groovy" people were doing back then.  I always felt that the t.v. show was more about trying to link into the "flower power" generation than honor the comic.  

We were also dealing with censorship which included just how provocative costuming could be.  Believe me, Cat Woman was one sexy babe back then.  The show also played with a good deal of sexual innuendo that was just becoming a part of the social structure in the 60's.  

I guess that my point is that the television series had more to do with social change and the evolution of television as a whole than it did with an accurate leap from the page to the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, in the 50&#8242;s and 60&#8242;s television was still a really new means of entertainment and we were also dealing with a couple of wars and a huge social revolution.  </p>
<p>The costumes and interpretations of the comic had a lot to do with what the &#8220;groovy&#8221; people were doing back then.  I always felt that the t.v. show was more about trying to link into the &#8220;flower power&#8221; generation than honor the comic.  </p>
<p>We were also dealing with censorship which included just how provocative costuming could be.  Believe me, Cat Woman was one sexy babe back then.  The show also played with a good deal of sexual innuendo that was just becoming a part of the social structure in the 60&#8242;s.  </p>
<p>I guess that my point is that the television series had more to do with social change and the evolution of television as a whole than it did with an accurate leap from the page to the screen.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P_bZsB9es_lN-WTOmB6Sb1JXycU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P_bZsB9es_lN-WTOmB6Sb1JXycU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P_bZsB9es_lN-WTOmB6Sb1JXycU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P_bZsB9es_lN-WTOmB6Sb1JXycU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lord of The Rings by Bill, son of Thrill</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, son of Thrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=49#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Ginger, all you have to say is "The Scouring of the Shire" and the argument is finished!  This was the best part of the novel, and it was totally dismissed like George Bush's knowledge of Al Qaeda's imminent attack.  Shameful.

I just noticed that I wrote LOL instead of LOTR..... interesting.  Anyone who remakes this movie in the future is going to have to give the book Lots Of Love (...and Luck, and Laughs)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Ginger, all you have to say is &#8220;The Scouring of the Shire&#8221; and the argument is finished!  This was the best part of the novel, and it was totally dismissed like George Bush&#8217;s knowledge of Al Qaeda&#8217;s imminent attack.  Shameful.</p>
<p>I just noticed that I wrote LOL instead of LOTR&#8230;.. interesting.  Anyone who remakes this movie in the future is going to have to give the book Lots Of Love (&#8230;and Luck, and Laughs)</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/egkF6lkuJRtvfnmtW45GiRN4rD0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/egkF6lkuJRtvfnmtW45GiRN4rD0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/egkF6lkuJRtvfnmtW45GiRN4rD0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/egkF6lkuJRtvfnmtW45GiRN4rD0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Psycho:  The Lost Message by Lindsey Boise</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/american-psycho-the-lost-message/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Boise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=122#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The movie character's actions were graphic, but the viewer was left to wonder at some of the deep psychological underpinnings of his violence. That is a symptom, however, that I often find lacking in a book to screen adaptation.

As a side note, have you heard "American Psycho" by The Misfits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie character&#8217;s actions were graphic, but the viewer was left to wonder at some of the deep psychological underpinnings of his violence. That is a symptom, however, that I often find lacking in a book to screen adaptation.</p>
<p>As a side note, have you heard &#8220;American Psycho&#8221; by The Misfits?</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AfphbWS1QiomQgWdmP7brZ4aK3s/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AfphbWS1QiomQgWdmP7brZ4aK3s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AfphbWS1QiomQgWdmP7brZ4aK3s/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AfphbWS1QiomQgWdmP7brZ4aK3s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coraline by Lindsey Boise</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/coraline/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Boise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=158#comment-10</guid>
		<description>After watching three previews promoting "family" movies before the DVD menu came on, I knew this was going to be slightly watered down. I also was slightly annoyed with what appeared to be a rip-off of Tim Burton's visual style. That's just an impertinent side note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching three previews promoting &#8220;family&#8221; movies before the DVD menu came on, I knew this was going to be slightly watered down. I also was slightly annoyed with what appeared to be a rip-off of Tim Burton&#8217;s visual style. That&#8217;s just an impertinent side note.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1qAzVYGOirIihnP06w_i2zcAAww/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1qAzVYGOirIihnP06w_i2zcAAww/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1qAzVYGOirIihnP06w_i2zcAAww/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1qAzVYGOirIihnP06w_i2zcAAww/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coraline by Aaron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/coraline/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=158#comment-9</guid>
		<description>The movie lacked the classic Neil Gaiman edge that I know and love.  I feel like it was trying really hard to earn ticketing revenue from the family crowd.  I actually stopped watching it halfway through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie lacked the classic Neil Gaiman edge that I know and love.  I feel like it was trying really hard to earn ticketing revenue from the family crowd.  I actually stopped watching it halfway through.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZvFFN8vlstS_wiMTmhqKSNDxQQk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZvFFN8vlstS_wiMTmhqKSNDxQQk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZvFFN8vlstS_wiMTmhqKSNDxQQk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZvFFN8vlstS_wiMTmhqKSNDxQQk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein (Sega CD) by Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/games/mary-shellys-frankenstein-sega-cd/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=102#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I feel honored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel honored.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NBXfiXNq-ClXhI-wbxw4CqyhHxE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NBXfiXNq-ClXhI-wbxw4CqyhHxE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NBXfiXNq-ClXhI-wbxw4CqyhHxE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NBXfiXNq-ClXhI-wbxw4CqyhHxE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lord of The Rings by Ginger Burden Boise</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Burden Boise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=49#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks for such a nice post. I have lost count of the times I hollered at someone in passionate debate over book vs. movie. Here are a few points from me. 

1. I love Quickbeam. I feel pretty sure Lindsey only added that because of me (not that he, too, does not also love QB) but I appreciate him doing so all the same. We don't see much of him in the book, but he is such a lovely character - full of laughter and *haste*- and really gives another layer of dimension to the Ents as he is the only other Ent, other than Treebeard, we see the hobbits interact with. And it's mightily important that we do see that interaction, to understand just how different they all are from one another. I'm not completely unhappy with PJ's portrayal of the Ents...seriously, who didn't love the storming of Isengard? Booting orcs in the pit, stomping on some squealing goblins. If only they could have spent a wee more time on that and not all the swashbuckling and shield-surfing. 

2. Oh, Denethor. This is another example of something I suspect Lindsey added for my benefit. I remember crying over him, especially the first time I read it, because it was just all so tragic. And then the movie comes around and he is some whiny, grimacing, drama queen? Really?  Sure, Denethor is kind of an a-hole no matter how you look at it, but there are reasons for this that at the very least give his character some depth. Tolkien portrays him as a man of great strength, will, and intellect - equal in these things almost to Gandalf. And though he thinks of himself as stronger than Saruman and incapable of being controlled by Sauron through the palantir, it warps his mind into something dark and damaged. But he realizes his mistakes in the end. And his mistakes are so great, costing him his sons and his people. Was it a good idea for him to drag a living Faramir onto the flaming pyre with him? No. But it was his special way of saying "This is my son and we die in honor together". Does he look ridiculous running out of the door engulfed in flames, across the hundreds of feet to and then off the precipice? Yes. That alone makes me shake my fist in anger each time I watch it - after I laugh-out-loud, of course. His death should not have been comic relief. Moving on...

3.Scouring of the Shire. What a damn shame. Enough said. 

I could say more, of course, but I am finished for the moment. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such a nice post. I have lost count of the times I hollered at someone in passionate debate over book vs. movie. Here are a few points from me. </p>
<p>1. I love Quickbeam. I feel pretty sure Lindsey only added that because of me (not that he, too, does not also love QB) but I appreciate him doing so all the same. We don&#8217;t see much of him in the book, but he is such a lovely character &#8211; full of laughter and *haste*- and really gives another layer of dimension to the Ents as he is the only other Ent, other than Treebeard, we see the hobbits interact with. And it&#8217;s mightily important that we do see that interaction, to understand just how different they all are from one another. I&#8217;m not completely unhappy with PJ&#8217;s portrayal of the Ents&#8230;seriously, who didn&#8217;t love the storming of Isengard? Booting orcs in the pit, stomping on some squealing goblins. If only they could have spent a wee more time on that and not all the swashbuckling and shield-surfing. </p>
<p>2. Oh, Denethor. This is another example of something I suspect Lindsey added for my benefit. I remember crying over him, especially the first time I read it, because it was just all so tragic. And then the movie comes around and he is some whiny, grimacing, drama queen? Really?  Sure, Denethor is kind of an a-hole no matter how you look at it, but there are reasons for this that at the very least give his character some depth. Tolkien portrays him as a man of great strength, will, and intellect &#8211; equal in these things almost to Gandalf. And though he thinks of himself as stronger than Saruman and incapable of being controlled by Sauron through the palantir, it warps his mind into something dark and damaged. But he realizes his mistakes in the end. And his mistakes are so great, costing him his sons and his people. Was it a good idea for him to drag a living Faramir onto the flaming pyre with him? No. But it was his special way of saying &#8220;This is my son and we die in honor together&#8221;. Does he look ridiculous running out of the door engulfed in flames, across the hundreds of feet to and then off the precipice? Yes. That alone makes me shake my fist in anger each time I watch it &#8211; after I laugh-out-loud, of course. His death should not have been comic relief. Moving on&#8230;</p>
<p>3.Scouring of the Shire. What a damn shame. Enough said. </p>
<p>I could say more, of course, but I am finished for the moment. Thank you.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IfOC9smr881SqcZenlu38e18Fww/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IfOC9smr881SqcZenlu38e18Fww/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IfOC9smr881SqcZenlu38e18Fww/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IfOC9smr881SqcZenlu38e18Fww/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lord of The Rings by Bill, son of Thrill</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/cinema/the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, son of Thrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=49#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis.  Indeed, there are lots of insults added to injuries here.   

The screenwriters should have had more respect for the best selling novel of the 20th century.  Tolkien had already made their lives easy with his great writing style - which, in my opinion, was easily adaptable to a screenplay, -- buy they decided to change the story altogether!   I think it was necessary to trim down the story to fit it all into three movies, but they certainly didn't have to add so many new, poorly written parts.  I don't think the writers should have been given license to distort the coherence of this masterpiece.   It bums me out that they are making so much money for this.  I wonder how the Tolkien family feels about it.

Let me make one thing clear:  This is no ordinary case of "the book is always better than the movie".   This is much, much worse.

Does Peter Jackson have a NON-fan club?  I'd like to join.  Why does he take masterpieces like LOL and King Kong, give them awesome special effects and costume design, and then throw the writing into the sewer?  I feel for the actors.  

Someday, someone will remake LOL much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis.  Indeed, there are lots of insults added to injuries here.   </p>
<p>The screenwriters should have had more respect for the best selling novel of the 20th century.  Tolkien had already made their lives easy with his great writing style &#8211; which, in my opinion, was easily adaptable to a screenplay, &#8212; buy they decided to change the story altogether!   I think it was necessary to trim down the story to fit it all into three movies, but they certainly didn&#8217;t have to add so many new, poorly written parts.  I don&#8217;t think the writers should have been given license to distort the coherence of this masterpiece.   It bums me out that they are making so much money for this.  I wonder how the Tolkien family feels about it.</p>
<p>Let me make one thing clear:  This is no ordinary case of &#8220;the book is always better than the movie&#8221;.   This is much, much worse.</p>
<p>Does Peter Jackson have a NON-fan club?  I&#8217;d like to join.  Why does he take masterpieces like LOL and King Kong, give them awesome special effects and costume design, and then throw the writing into the sewer?  I feel for the actors.  </p>
<p>Someday, someone will remake LOL much better.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PxzykS5n8hyrWgqQp-5vNdSQ0hU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PxzykS5n8hyrWgqQp-5vNdSQ0hU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PxzykS5n8hyrWgqQp-5vNdSQ0hU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PxzykS5n8hyrWgqQp-5vNdSQ0hU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gift (that you may not really want) by Aaron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/literature/the-gift-that-you-may-not-really-want/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasgoodasthebook.com/?p=68#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry to hear about your beloved book.  When reading poetry I always assume the poet will lie to me at some point during a poem.  Writer's make a living by telling half truths to evoke a catharsis in the reader.  Is it more important to have absolute truth in art, or is it more important to be moved by art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear about your beloved book.  When reading poetry I always assume the poet will lie to me at some point during a poem.  Writer&#8217;s make a living by telling half truths to evoke a catharsis in the reader.  Is it more important to have absolute truth in art, or is it more important to be moved by art?</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7TP_6nYkbIHmAdOC5iiGMKIKJCA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7TP_6nYkbIHmAdOC5iiGMKIKJCA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7TP_6nYkbIHmAdOC5iiGMKIKJCA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7TP_6nYkbIHmAdOC5iiGMKIKJCA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

