<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Noted Poker Authority</title>
	
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForNotedPokerAuthority" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Paying Off Too Much? by BubbleBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/are-you-paying-off-too-much.html/comment-page-1#comment-15858</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbleBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=938#comment-15858</guid>
		<description>in the last hand it's rather unlikely villain would bet the river with Ah6h.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the last hand it&#8217;s rather unlikely villain would bet the river with Ah6h.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Short I Think You Should Go by Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/how-short-i-think-you-should-go.html/comment-page-1#comment-15856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/how-short-i-think-you-should-go.html#comment-15856</guid>
		<description>moneytize,

Yes, you're a large dog to win a tournament with $100 if there are $60k chips in play. But that doesn't mean that it's a losing proposition, because the prize of the tournament is considerably larger than the entry fee. So even though you fail to win the tournament more often than not even with 100 tries, you win much more than your entry when you do win.

And the example you gave where you're playing $100 vs. $59,900 heads up destroys the point of playing short stacked. You only get the advantage of a short stack in multiway pots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moneytize,</p>
<p>Yes, you&#8217;re a large dog to win a tournament with $100 if there are $60k chips in play. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s a losing proposition, because the prize of the tournament is considerably larger than the entry fee. So even though you fail to win the tournament more often than not even with 100 tries, you win much more than your entry when you do win.</p>
<p>And the example you gave where you&#8217;re playing $100 vs. $59,900 heads up destroys the point of playing short stacked. You only get the advantage of a short stack in multiway pots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Short I Think You Should Go by moneytize</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/how-short-i-think-you-should-go.html/comment-page-1#comment-15855</link>
		<dc:creator>moneytize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/how-short-i-think-you-should-go.html#comment-15855</guid>
		<description>yes but assuming that you have to go in all the time since your stack is so small relative to the blinds, you will be losing more often (though you are technically making more money per hand than your opponents for the reasons  you stated).

the good thing about losing is that you get 100 rebuys at the tournament. so assuming that one of your opponents takes all the other opponents chips over time, and chances are you get stacked, you will be playing against him heads up $59,900 to $100. If I did my math right, that means you need to win 9 all-ins in a row to defeat your opponent. Assuming both opponents are of equal skill, and each all in on average we win 1/2 the time (to the ninth power), we would have odds of 512:1 to taking all our opponents chips. with only 100 tries, this would be losing.

Let me know if my math went wrong somewhere since I'm tired and could very easily have made a mistake :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes but assuming that you have to go in all the time since your stack is so small relative to the blinds, you will be losing more often (though you are technically making more money per hand than your opponents for the reasons  you stated).</p>
<p>the good thing about losing is that you get 100 rebuys at the tournament. so assuming that one of your opponents takes all the other opponents chips over time, and chances are you get stacked, you will be playing against him heads up $59,900 to $100. If I did my math right, that means you need to win 9 all-ins in a row to defeat your opponent. Assuming both opponents are of equal skill, and each all in on average we win 1/2 the time (to the ninth power), we would have odds of 512:1 to taking all our opponents chips. with only 100 tries, this would be losing.</p>
<p>Let me know if my math went wrong somewhere since I&#8217;m tired and could very easily have made a mistake <img src='http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Full Tilt Poker Will Now Pay For Your Stoxpoker And Cardrunners Memberships by Rakeback</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/news/full-tilt-poker-will-now-pay-for-your-stoxpoker-and-cardrunners-memberships.html/comment-page-1#comment-15852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakeback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=657#comment-15852</guid>
		<description>Get the best rakeback payments when you play online poker from raketherake.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get the best rakeback payments when you play online poker from raketherake.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight by tip</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/7-easy-steps-to-no-limit-holdem-success-step-1-play-tight.html/comment-page-1#comment-15849</link>
		<dc:creator>tip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/7-easy-steps-to-no-limit-holdem-success-step-1-play-tight.html#comment-15849</guid>
		<description>Hello, I'm a regular visitor to your site so i finally decided its time to sign your guestbook, so here i sign !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I&#8217;m a regular visitor to your site so i finally decided its time to sign your guestbook, so here i sign !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6 Must-Have and Mostly Free Poker Tools You May Not Know About by jrzwpqi</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/playing-for-a-living/6-must-have-and-mostly-free-poker-tools-you-may-not-know-about.html/comment-page-1#comment-15848</link>
		<dc:creator>jrzwpqi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/playing-for-a-living/6-must-have-and-mostly-free-poker-tools-you-may-not-know-about.html#comment-15848</guid>
		<description>U9fuRH  &lt;a href="http://qnlixxmdgrew.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;qnlixxmdgrew&lt;/a&gt;, [url=http://frnkvmynnvxm.com/]frnkvmynnvxm[/url], [link=http://ebfknwqghsfc.com/]ebfknwqghsfc[/link], http://ortqaqansahz.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U9fuRH  <a href="http://qnlixxmdgrew.com/" rel="nofollow">qnlixxmdgrew</a>, [url=http://frnkvmynnvxm.com/]frnkvmynnvxm[/url], [link=http://ebfknwqghsfc.com/]ebfknwqghsfc[/link], <a href="http://ortqaqansahz.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ortqaqansahz.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A #96: A No-Limit Hold’em Postflop and Preflop Twofer (With Hand Reading) by tip</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-96-a-no-limit-holdem-postflop-and-preflop-twofer-with-hand-reading.html/comment-page-1#comment-15846</link>
		<dc:creator>tip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-96-a-no-limit-holdem-postflop-and-preflop-twofer-with-hand-reading.html#comment-15846</guid>
		<description>check this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suited Connectors In No-Limit Hold’em Revisited by guide</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/suited-connectors-in-no-limit-holdem-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-15845</link>
		<dc:creator>guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=593#comment-15845</guid>
		<description>Thank you, friends, for your sharing your ideas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, friends, for your sharing your ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alas, An Overcard by garcia1000</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/alas-an-overcard.html/comment-page-1#comment-15843</link>
		<dc:creator>garcia1000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=934#comment-15843</guid>
		<description>How about raising the turn to, say, $10? It is a semi-bluff. True, it represents nothing, but an opponent who would bet $2 into a $10 pot probably won't be thinking about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about raising the turn to, say, $10? It is a semi-bluff. True, it represents nothing, but an opponent who would bet $2 into a $10 pot probably won&#8217;t be thinking about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alas, An Overcard by Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/alas-an-overcard.html/comment-page-1#comment-15842</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=934#comment-15842</guid>
		<description>SBruno,

Guys often won't take free cards in this situation and instead will opt to make these small bets with draws and weak made hands. I wouldn't necessarily say it's a good strategy, but people do it all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBruno,</p>
<p>Guys often won&#8217;t take free cards in this situation and instead will opt to make these small bets with draws and weak made hands. I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily say it&#8217;s a good strategy, but people do it all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
