Comments for Mark Horne http://www.hornes.org/mark The cyberstalkable freelance writer making retractions on the web since 2000.... Oops, 1993? Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:19:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on How Satan “touched” Job’s flesh and bone by mark http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/15/how-satan-touched-jobs-flesh-and-bone/comment-page-1/#comment-444350 mark Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:19:21 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6691#comment-444350 Touching Job's bone and his flesh led to his wife speaking for the Accuser and tempting Job to curse God. Touching Job’s bone and his flesh led to his wife speaking for the Accuser and tempting Job to curse God.

]]> Comment on How Satan “touched” Job’s flesh and bone by Scott Moonen http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/15/how-satan-touched-jobs-flesh-and-bone/comment-page-1/#comment-444348 Scott Moonen Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:03:50 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6691#comment-444348 Sorry, not quite getting it... Are you drawing a parallel to Jacob's wrestling? Sorry, not quite getting it… Are you drawing a parallel to Jacob’s wrestling?

]]> Comment on How Satan “touched” Job’s flesh and bone by pentamom http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/15/how-satan-touched-jobs-flesh-and-bone/comment-page-1/#comment-444347 pentamom Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:43:34 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6691#comment-444347 Ooh. Ah. Very interesting! Ooh. Ah. Very interesting!

]]> Comment on RePost: Why the FV Controversy? Because of Warfield by Bobber http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/15/repost-why-the-fv-controversy-because-of-warfield/comment-page-1/#comment-444343 Bobber Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:33:25 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6687#comment-444343 Did Warfield have any friendship with Woodrow Wilson? What was Warfields views of WWI? Just curious. Did Warfield have any friendship with Woodrow Wilson? What was Warfields views of WWI? Just curious.

]]> Comment on Socialism is not about envy (though I’d vote for impatience) by pentamom http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/12/socialism-is-not-about-envy-though-id-vote-for-impatience/comment-page-1/#comment-444338 pentamom Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:44:27 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6664#comment-444338 Well, I suppose it depends who you are talking about. I hear an awful lot of stuff in the general public discourse about "income disparity" in a way that implies that the problem is more how much some people have than how much others don't have. Well, I suppose it depends who you are talking about. I hear an awful lot of stuff in the general public discourse about “income disparity” in a way that implies that the problem is more how much some people have than how much others don’t have.

]]> Comment on The judgment of charity and not slandering God by C. Frank Bernard http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/13/the-judgment-of-charity-and-not-slandering-god/comment-page-1/#comment-444334 C. Frank Bernard Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:55:56 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6674#comment-444334 I think they feared the worst and then complained. I think they feared the worst and then complained.

]]> Comment on Is it true that God may not intend to save all who are baptized? by Mark Horne » Blog Archive » The judgment of charity and not slandering God http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/13/is-it-true-that-god-may-not-intend-to-save-all-who-are-baptized/comment-page-1/#comment-444333 Mark Horne » Blog Archive » The judgment of charity and not slandering God Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:11:30 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6672#comment-444333 [...] Home « Is it true that God may not intend to save all who are baptized? [...] [...] Home « Is it true that God may not intend to save all who are baptized? [...]

]]> Comment on Today is Peter Leithart Day: Buy a book; you know you need one by Valerie (Kyriosity) http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/12/today-is-peter-leithart-day-buy-a-book-you-know-you-need-one/comment-page-1/#comment-444330 Valerie (Kyriosity) Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:24:04 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6661#comment-444330 Aaannnnnd....he's fun for all ages! Whatever else you buy, grab a copy of <i>Wise Words</i> if you don't already have it. Or if someone you know and love doesn't already have it. Heck, you could even buy it for someone you hate. Some of the most beautiful stories you will ever read to yourself or to your children. Aaannnnnd….he’s fun for all ages! Whatever else you buy, grab a copy of Wise Words if you don’t already have it. Or if someone you know and love doesn’t already have it. Heck, you could even buy it for someone you hate. Some of the most beautiful stories you will ever read to yourself or to your children.

]]> Comment on Benedict Pictet on the justification of a righteous man by mark http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/09/benedict-pictet-on-the-justification-of-a-righteous-man/comment-page-1/#comment-444327 mark Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:12:03 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6625#comment-444327 He was considered the theological benchmark by Presbyterians of the era of Charles Hodge. Of course, the idea of calling Murray a "drunk uncle" was to marginalize and entire swathe of the Reformed heritage. He was considered the theological benchmark by Presbyterians of the era of Charles Hodge. Of course, the idea of calling Murray a “drunk uncle” was to marginalize and entire swathe of the Reformed heritage.

]]> Comment on Benedict Pictet on the justification of a righteous man by Ken Christian http://www.hornes.org/mark/2010/03/09/benedict-pictet-on-the-justification-of-a-righteous-man/comment-page-1/#comment-444326 Ken Christian Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:26:55 +0000 http://www.hornes.org/mark/?p=6625#comment-444326 Agreed. And I think that if you leave behind the whole idea of merit (as Wright does) than any major differences between "on the basic of" and "according to" tend to slip into the background. As for Pictet, how does the Reformed community tend to view him. I think your site was the first place I'd ever seen his name. Is he regarded as another one our "drunk uncles"? Agreed. And I think that if you leave behind the whole idea of merit (as Wright does) than any major differences between “on the basic of” and “according to” tend to slip into the background.

As for Pictet, how does the Reformed community tend to view him. I think your site was the first place I’d ever seen his name. Is he regarded as another one our “drunk uncles”?

]]>