<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"> <channel><title>Comments for Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture</title> <link>http://www.racialicious.com</link> <description>Race, Culture, and Identity in a Colorstruck World</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForRacialicious" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforracialicious" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item><title>Comment on Violence On And Off The Ice: Twitter Racism And The NHL by Peter Hassett</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/16/violence-on-and-off-the-ice-twitter-racism-and-the-nhl/#comment-25813</link> <dc:creator>Peter Hassett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22700#comment-25813</guid> <description>Thanks for the article, David. I write a blog about the Capitals (and I've been a reader/commentator here for a while), and I'll be spreading the word about this piece.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, David. I write a blog about the Capitals (and I&#8217;ve been a reader/commentator here for a while), and I&#8217;ll be spreading the word about this piece.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on On Our Radar:  Push Girls by Tim Jones-Yelvington</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/16/on-our-radar-push-girls/#comment-25812</link> <dc:creator>Tim Jones-Yelvington</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22666#comment-25812</guid> <description>This looks potentially really great, although I am somewhat put off by how gorgeous and Hollywood thin they all appear to be. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks potentially really great, although I am somewhat put off by how gorgeous and Hollywood thin they all appear to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by Anonymous</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25811</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25811</guid> <description>One thing that I find problematic is that aside from the fat bashing, this author contributes to the misinterpretation of the "black beauty standard."  And b/c she is a black woman, she will be seen as speaking for us all.  And I HATE that.  I dislike minorities who seek to curry favor with the mainstream by putting us down in public.  Black men don't like fat women (well, maybe fat WHITE women as Chris Rock discussed in one of his comedy shows and as was spoofed by Rachel Dratch on SNL).  They like small to medium women with large, round butts (large breasts are optional).  But the ideal waist would still be small and the stomach would be flat, and yes, some thickness in the thighs is preferable to stick legs for a lot of them. But not fat or obese.  If you are in fact larger then you'd still better have a nice hourglass figure with  a small waist.  And that body type does NOT increase your risk for heart disease or diabetes.  It's called steatopygia, and there is a reason why women of African descent sometimes have this shape (it increases reproductive fitness/fertility while minimizes body area, a necessity in hotter climates).  I'm kind of tired of the fact that black women who aren't fat get described as fat b/c they have thicker thighs and larger butts (no, not all black women have this but I'm not going to pretend that this particular fat distribution isn't more common in black women).  For some reason, the skinny legs, flat bottom, and visceral body fat distribution found more frequently on whites is never attacked as being fat(or ugly for that matter).  But thick thighs and a large bottom on a small waist becomes "fat."  I actually am fat but it is clear that my bottom will always be prominent(and as I work out and lose weight, it stands out more) and I like it, and anyone who has a problem with that can suck it.  My goal is to be healthy and my butt is a permanent feature of that journey.  So even if we wanted to pretend that this is based on male preference and not genetics, it still comes down to something that is associated with black women being deemed ugly by the mainstream.  And at the end of the day this is Sarah Baartman all over again.  The othering of black women, and the message that they have no right to have any pride in a society that puts them down, and that their "features" are ugly when compared to non-black women.  It really bothers people that black women don't internalize these messages, and they won't ever let us forget that they think we are ugly.In the grander scheme of things, I don't think it's helpful to try to define fatness or what someone SHOULD weight b/c no one knows where healthy eating and exercise will take their body, and people should not feel that they are doing something wrong just because it doesn't take them to a size 4 jeans.I wish people would focus on diet and exercise and stop trying to divine people's medical histories based on their pants size.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I find problematic is that aside from the fat bashing, this author contributes to the misinterpretation of the &#8220;black beauty standard.&#8221;  And b/c she is a black woman, she will be seen as speaking for us all.  And I HATE that.  I dislike minorities who seek to curry favor with the mainstream by putting us down in public.  </p><p>Black men don&#8217;t like fat women (well, maybe fat WHITE women as Chris Rock discussed in one of his comedy shows and as was spoofed by Rachel Dratch on SNL).  They like small to medium women with large, round butts (large breasts are optional).  But the ideal waist would still be small and the stomach would be flat, and yes, some thickness in the thighs is preferable to stick legs for a lot of them. But not fat or obese.  If you are in fact larger then you&#8217;d still better have a nice hourglass figure with  a small waist.  And that body type does NOT increase your risk for heart disease or diabetes.  It&#8217;s called steatopygia, and there is a reason why women of African descent sometimes have this shape (it increases reproductive fitness/fertility while minimizes body area, a necessity in hotter climates).  </p><p>I&#8217;m kind of tired of the fact that black women who aren&#8217;t fat get described as fat b/c they have thicker thighs and larger butts (no, not all black women have this but I&#8217;m not going to pretend that this particular fat distribution isn&#8217;t more common in black women).  For some reason, the skinny legs, flat bottom, and visceral body fat distribution found more frequently on whites is never attacked as being fat(or ugly for that matter).  But thick thighs and a large bottom on a small waist becomes &#8220;fat.&#8221;  I actually am fat but it is clear that my bottom will always be prominent(and as I work out and lose weight, it stands out more) and I like it, and anyone who has a problem with that can suck it.  My goal is to be healthy and my butt is a permanent feature of that journey.  </p><p>So even if we wanted to pretend that this is based on male preference and not genetics, it still comes down to something that is associated with black women being deemed ugly by the mainstream.  </p><p>And at the end of the day this is Sarah Baartman all over again.  The othering of black women, and the message that they have no right to have any pride in a society that puts them down, and that their &#8220;features&#8221; are ugly when compared to non-black women.  It really bothers people that black women don&#8217;t internalize these messages, and they won&#8217;t ever let us forget that they think we are ugly.</p><p>In the grander scheme of things, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s helpful to try to define fatness or what someone SHOULD weight b/c no one knows where healthy eating and exercise will take their body, and people should not feel that they are doing something wrong just because it doesn&#8217;t take them to a size 4 jeans.</p><p>I wish people would focus on diet and exercise and stop trying to divine people&#8217;s medical histories based on their pants size.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Excerpt: Aasif Mandvi’s Impersonation Of A Studio Bigwig by RCHOUDH</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/excerpt-aasif-mandvis-impersonation-of-a-studio-bigwig/#comment-25810</link> <dc:creator>RCHOUDH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22737#comment-25810</guid> <description>He's in the Dictator? Well that's disappointing...hopefully he's playing something satirical (though I won't bother finding out since I won't watch that dreck). But as for his Salon piece it's pretty spot-on about the inner workings of Hollywood (that they don't want the public to be in on).  </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s in the Dictator? Well that&#8217;s disappointing&#8230;hopefully he&#8217;s playing something satirical (though I won&#8217;t bother finding out since I won&#8217;t watch that dreck). But as for his Salon piece it&#8217;s pretty spot-on about the inner workings of Hollywood (that they don&#8217;t want the public to be in on). </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by Anonymous</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25809</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25809</guid> <description>I am a white male, and I am obese.  I struggle with it.  I will offer the idea that no one really understand obesity, if I was given an easy manageable way to lose weight, I would take it.  Most people would.  Not because of looks, but because of health.  But despite the legions of skinny doctors who have all the answers, it ain't that easy, for me or anyone else. Seriously, picking my black sisters as if they were somehow different from me?  Get a life, and find some real answers, or leave us alone.Well written. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a white male, and I am obese.  I struggle with it.  I will offer the idea that no one really understand obesity, if I was given an easy manageable way to lose weight, I would take it.  Most people would.  Not because of looks, but because of health.  But despite the legions of skinny doctors who have all the answers, it ain&#8217;t that easy, for me or anyone else. </p><p>Seriously, picking my black sisters as if they were somehow different from me?  Get a life, and find some real answers, or leave us alone.</p><p>Well written.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Violetta</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25808</link> <dc:creator>Violetta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25808</guid> <description>Chataya and Alayaya were two minor characters in the books who I was very curious to know more about. They were successful businesswomen AND sexually confident, turning the whole idea of prostitution as degrading to women on it's head. Elsewhere on the internet nobody has been able to bring up the idea that there may be just a little more T&amp;A than is necessary to provide exposition without being howled down as a sexually-repressed prude by defensive fanboys who obviously didn't even read the articles. Testament to the high standards of commenters on this website. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chataya and Alayaya were two minor characters in the books who I was very curious to know more about. They were successful businesswomen AND sexually confident, turning the whole idea of prostitution as degrading to women on it&#8217;s head. </p><p>Elsewhere on the internet nobody has been able to bring up the idea that there may be just a little more T&amp;A than is necessary to provide exposition without being howled down as a sexually-repressed prude by defensive fanboys who obviously didn&#8217;t even read the articles. Testament to the high standards of commenters on this website. <img src='http://www.racialicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Violetta</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25807</link> <dc:creator>Violetta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25807</guid> <description>Chataya and Alayaya were two minor characters in the books who I was very curious to know more about. They were successful businesswomen AND sexually confident, turning the whole idea of prostitution as degrading to women on it's head. Elsewhere on the internet nobody has been able to bring up the idea that there may be just a little more T&amp;A than is necessary to provide exposition without being howled down as a sexually-repressed prude by defensive fanboys who obviously didn't even read the articles. Testament to the high standards of commenters on this website. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chataya and Alayaya were two minor characters in the books who I was very curious to know more about. They were successful businesswomen AND sexually confident, turning the whole idea of prostitution as degrading to women on it&#8217;s head. </p><p>Elsewhere on the internet nobody has been able to bring up the idea that there may be just a little more T&amp;A than is necessary to provide exposition without being howled down as a sexually-repressed prude by defensive fanboys who obviously didn&#8217;t even read the articles. Testament to the high standards of commenters on this website. <img src='http://www.racialicious.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Nejasna ちゃん</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25806</link> <dc:creator>Nejasna ちゃん</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25806</guid> <description>Well that's what happens when you write people of colour as just side characters,  they will always look like an afterthought, will always be the first ones to get axed, and developing their roles will mess with screen time needed for the main story. Could have mixed up races instead of having stereotypical white civilised north/dark wild tribes in the south, had a few or at least one important family of non-whites instead of all of them white.  I doubt that would have made books unpopular, Earthsea series did just fine. Nudity wise, the brothel was supposed to cater to all tastes, meaning there would have been boys/men, trans people, more services than just appealing to straight men - what about rich women of the city or people of different sexualities? But the only thing shown, in either books or on tv was girls being available to men/ girls being taught to preform lesbian sex for men. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s what happens when you write people of colour as just side characters,  they will always look like an afterthought, will always be the first ones to get axed, and developing their roles will mess with screen time needed for the main story. </p><p>Could have mixed up races instead of having stereotypical white civilised north/dark wild tribes in the south, had a few or at least one important family of non-whites instead of all of them white.  I doubt that would have made books unpopular, Earthsea series did just fine. </p><p>Nudity wise, the brothel was supposed to cater to all tastes, meaning there would have been boys/men, trans people, more services than just appealing to straight men &#8211; what about rich women of the city or people of different sexualities? But the only thing shown, in either books or on tv was girls being available to men/ girls being taught to preform lesbian sex for men. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Nejasna ちゃん</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25805</link> <dc:creator>Nejasna ちゃん</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25805</guid> <description>Well that's what happens when you write people of colour as just side characters,  they will always look like an afterthought, will always be the first ones to get axed, and developing their roles will mess with screen time needed for the main story. Could have mixed up races instead of having stereotypical white civilised north/dark wild tribes in the south, had a few or at least one important family of non-whites instead of all of them white.  I doubt that would have made books unpopular, Earthsea series did just fine. Nudity wise, the brothel was supposed to cater to all tastes, meaning there would have been boys/men, trans people, more services than just appealing to straight men - what about rich women of the city or people of different sexualities? But the only thing shown, in either books or on tv was girls being available to men/ girls being taught to preform lesbian sex for men. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s what happens when you write people of colour as just side characters,  they will always look like an afterthought, will always be the first ones to get axed, and developing their roles will mess with screen time needed for the main story. </p><p>Could have mixed up races instead of having stereotypical white civilised north/dark wild tribes in the south, had a few or at least one important family of non-whites instead of all of them white.  I doubt that would have made books unpopular, Earthsea series did just fine. </p><p>Nudity wise, the brothel was supposed to cater to all tastes, meaning there would have been boys/men, trans people, more services than just appealing to straight men &#8211; what about rich women of the city or people of different sexualities? But the only thing shown, in either books or on tv was girls being available to men/ girls being taught to preform lesbian sex for men. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The Struggles of Discussing Race In The Asian American Evangelical Church [Racialigious] by StrngeFruit</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/14/the-struggles-of-discussing-race-in-the-asian-american-evangelical-church-racialigious/#comment-25804</link> <dc:creator>StrngeFruit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22639#comment-25804</guid> <description>Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The Struggles of Discussing Race In The Asian American Evangelical Church [Racialigious] by StrngeFruit</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/14/the-struggles-of-discussing-race-in-the-asian-american-evangelical-church-racialigious/#comment-25803</link> <dc:creator>StrngeFruit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22639#comment-25803</guid> <description>Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Lewis3748</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25802</link> <dc:creator>Lewis3748</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25802</guid> <description>Soft core porn has become the new paradigm from the raped and broken bodies of female victims on network police procedurals to the wink nudge of cable programming. Men and women now right this crap endlessly and without shame. Interracial relationships have to be downplayed or avoided altogether.  How can you have a relationship with WOC characters? They are ciphers, fetishes - without agency, history or desires of their own. Allowing them to have desires rocks the boat too deeply.The relationship between the adaptation of Games of Thrones and the racist backlash against the Hunger Games casting makes it clear how much is at stake, in the imaginary and at the box office.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soft core porn has become the new paradigm from the raped and broken bodies of female victims on network police procedurals to the wink nudge of cable programming. Men and women now right this crap endlessly and without shame. </p><p>Interracial relationships have to be downplayed or avoided altogether.  How can you have a relationship with WOC characters? They are ciphers, fetishes &#8211; without agency, history or desires of their own. Allowing them to have desires rocks the boat too deeply.</p><p>The relationship between the adaptation of Games of Thrones and the racist backlash against the Hunger Games casting makes it clear how much is at stake, in the imaginary and at the box office.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by k.eli</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25801</link> <dc:creator>k.eli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25801</guid> <description>Yes, yes, and YES!! It's as though they've convinced themselves that black people are somehow immune to certain illnesses or conditions. If I had a dime for every time I heard someone say "black women are so lucky that they're not pressured to be skinny" ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, and YES!! It&#8217;s as though they&#8217;ve convinced themselves that black people are somehow immune to certain illnesses or conditions. If I had a dime for every time I heard someone say &#8220;black women are so lucky that they&#8217;re not pressured to be skinny&#8221; &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Excerpt: Aasif Mandvi’s Impersonation Of A Studio Bigwig by Anonymous</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/excerpt-aasif-mandvis-impersonation-of-a-studio-bigwig/#comment-25800</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22737#comment-25800</guid> <description>what's he doin in The Dictator movie then? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s he doin in The Dictator movie then?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by Birch</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25799</link> <dc:creator>Birch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25799</guid> <description>Just wanted to add that binge eating is the most common eating disorder (but of course not every individual who is considered overweight or obese has this disorder).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add that binge eating is the most common eating disorder (but of course not every individual who is considered overweight or obese has this disorder).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by RCHOUDH</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25798</link> <dc:creator>RCHOUDH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25798</guid> <description>Great post on the reasons why that NYT article was so wrong to target and fat-shame one particular subset of the American population. It's always too easy to pick on someone for being fat without considering that a). not all fat people lead unhealthy lifestyles and b). for those suffering from health problems due to obesity, the causes are complex and multi-dimensional, and thus just fat-shaming people towards diet and exercise won't be enough to bring down America's obesity rate. If these fat-shamers really care, why don't they show it by calling for better public policies towards increasing access to fresh, organically grown food to the entire population (not just to middle-class shoppers at Trader Joes)? Why don't they find out the practices of corporations like Monsanto, that want to prevent access to good unprocessed foods? Or is it that they believe that government has no "right" to take away someone's right to eat unhealthy, the way some right wingers attacked Michelle Obama's proposal to introduce better school lunches to children?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post on the reasons why that NYT article was so wrong to target and fat-shame one particular subset of the American population. It&#8217;s always too easy to pick on someone for being fat without considering that a). not all fat people lead unhealthy lifestyles and b). for those suffering from health problems due to obesity, the causes are complex and multi-dimensional, and thus just fat-shaming people towards diet and exercise won&#8217;t be enough to bring down America&#8217;s obesity rate. If these fat-shamers really care, why don&#8217;t they show it by calling for better public policies towards increasing access to fresh, organically grown food to the entire population (not just to middle-class shoppers at Trader Joes)? Why don&#8217;t they find out the practices of corporations like Monsanto, that want to prevent access to good unprocessed foods? Or is it that they believe that government has no &#8220;right&#8221; to take away someone&#8217;s right to eat unhealthy, the way some right wingers attacked Michelle Obama&#8217;s proposal to introduce better school lunches to children?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by Rebecca A</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25797</link> <dc:creator>Rebecca A</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25797</guid> <description>Stuff like this makes it hard for black girls with eating disorders to get attention. the mentality that we all want to be fat is damaging and hides us. They think "Ohh she could never want to throw up or be anorexic. She wants a big butt and thighs, why would she restrict her food?" I hate it. I am not thin in the slightest, quiet fat, and OI'm struggling to love myself. This is terrible to assume that we all want to be one way. It's way many of us suffer alone. (I really want to go off about how this relates to how black people don't cut because it's for white folks but lets not) she needs to reconsider her terms when she says "all".</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuff like this makes it hard for black girls with eating disorders to get attention. the mentality that we all want to be fat is damaging and hides us. They think &#8220;Ohh she could never want to throw up or be anorexic. She wants a big butt and thighs, why would she restrict her food?&#8221; I hate it. I am not thin in the slightest, quiet fat, and OI&#8217;m struggling to love myself. This is terrible to assume that we all want to be one way. It&#8217;s way many of us suffer alone. (I really want to go off about how this relates to how black people don&#8217;t cut because it&#8217;s for white folks but lets not) she needs to reconsider her terms when she says &#8220;all&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by Keith</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25796</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25796</guid> <description> Working class people pay for the cost of living.  That includes all working class people and when times are hard some within these groups of working class get hit a little harder, but all in all we all suffer. The affluent pay for the quality of life. Their is obvious a link between the increase of obesity and the pressure of working class people to pay to maintain a decent quality of life as neo liberalism takes it's toll. So for the last 30-40 or so years their has been this subconscious notion that some how blacks are the burden that somehow holds America back from being the great nation it could be, and if blacks would go somewhere else or at least picked themselves up by their own boot straps (but disappearing would be much better) all will be right with the world. And you wonder why it's so easy for the 1% to take so much from white working class people that buy into this mess.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Working class people pay for the cost of living.  That includes all working class people and when times are hard some within these groups of working class get hit a little harder, but all in all we all suffer. The affluent pay for the quality of life. Their is obvious a link between the increase of obesity and the pressure of working class people to pay to maintain a decent quality of life as neo liberalism takes it&#8217;s toll. So for the last 30-40 or so years their has been this subconscious notion that some how blacks are the burden that somehow holds America back from being the great nation it could be, and if blacks would go somewhere else or at least picked themselves up by their own boot straps (but disappearing would be much better) all will be right with the world. And you wonder why it&#8217;s so easy for the 1% to take so much from white working class people that buy into this mess.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Game of Thrones’ Sexposition and Race Quandary by Greg_G</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/game-of-thrones-sexposition-and-race-quandary/#comment-25794</link> <dc:creator>Greg_G</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22744#comment-25794</guid> <description>The pilot had a shot of Robb, Jon, and Theon topless while shaving one another's hair.  And there have been shots of many male Dothraki bodies in various states of undress, not to mention Loras and Renly bare-chested.  So it hasn't been completely one-sided.  But, the male gaze is certainly prioritized in this show to an extreme extent.  I wasn't surprised by this in Season 1, as I'm sure HBO assumed males would make up an overwhelming percentage of the audience, but the subsequent ratings numbers indicating the massive popularity among female viewers should have given them cause to reconsider this issue of the male gaze.As for getting Joffrey laid, in the books Tyrion considers this solution after Joffrey has Sansa disrobed before the court in the throne room.  The thought was that maybe his extreme dickishness was a result of repressed sexual urges.  I think the television scene involving the outcome of this strategy was important in that it illustrated that Joffrey is rotten to the core, and not as a result of any burgeoning sexuality.  It strengthens the idea that his family and advisors have little control over him, directly or (in the case of trying to get him laid) indirectly.The character of Ros is indeed problematic though.  She has no agency.  She has only but the most vaguely defined goals - to make it to the big city (King's Landing).  To devote so much time to a character that has no purpose but to be the audience stand in as other characters plot and scheme or as the target of occasional physical and emotional abuse is curious at best.  I hope that this character, for the most part original to the tv series, is given a story arc of some sort.  She's earned it.  I can, however, understand combining the various brothel characters to streamline the storytelling.  Chataya and Alayaya are great characters, but hardly important to the story.  Having Tyrion lust for them in the show would diminish what they're trying to do with Shae.  Of course, part of this is logistical necessity - the books have more time to differentiate between his relationship with Shae and his attraction to Chataya and Alayaya.  A sad loss - along with Jalabhar Xho - and hopefully one that can be counteracted in later seasons with further adventures across the sea and north of the wall.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pilot had a shot of Robb, Jon, and Theon topless while shaving one another&#8217;s hair.  And there have been shots of many male Dothraki bodies in various states of undress, not to mention Loras and Renly bare-chested.  So it hasn&#8217;t been completely one-sided.  But, the male gaze is certainly prioritized in this show to an extreme extent.  I wasn&#8217;t surprised by this in Season 1, as I&#8217;m sure HBO assumed males would make up an overwhelming percentage of the audience, but the subsequent ratings numbers indicating the massive popularity among female viewers should have given them cause to reconsider this issue of the male gaze.</p><p>As for getting Joffrey laid, in the books Tyrion considers this solution after Joffrey has Sansa disrobed before the court in the throne room.  The thought was that maybe his extreme dickishness was a result of repressed sexual urges.  I think the television scene involving the outcome of this strategy was important in that it illustrated that Joffrey is rotten to the core, and not as a result of any burgeoning sexuality.  It strengthens the idea that his family and advisors have little control over him, directly or (in the case of trying to get him laid) indirectly.</p><p>The character of Ros is indeed problematic though.  She has no agency.  She has only but the most vaguely defined goals &#8211; to make it to the big city (King&#8217;s Landing).  To devote so much time to a character that has no purpose but to be the audience stand in as other characters plot and scheme or as the target of occasional physical and emotional abuse is curious at best.  I hope that this character, for the most part original to the tv series, is given a story arc of some sort.  She&#8217;s earned it.  I can, however, understand combining the various brothel characters to streamline the storytelling.  Chataya and Alayaya are great characters, but hardly important to the story.  Having Tyrion lust for them in the show would diminish what they&#8217;re trying to do with Shae.  Of course, part of this is logistical necessity &#8211; the books have more time to differentiate between his relationship with Shae and his attraction to Chataya and Alayaya.  A sad loss &#8211; along with Jalabhar Xho &#8211; and hopefully one that can be counteracted in later seasons with further adventures across the sea and north of the wall.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The New York Times Offers Reasons ‘Why Black Women Are Fat’ by k.eli</title><link>http://www.racialicious.com/2012/05/15/the-new-york-times-offers-reasons-why-black-women-are-fat/#comment-25793</link> <dc:creator>k.eli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racialicious.com/?p=22611#comment-25793</guid> <description>I don't think the author was suggesting that some fat will kill you; instead she was stating the fact that excessive fat is not good for you. I understand that overweight/obese people may feel (and rightfully so) that they're being attacked simply for being fat - but that doesn't change the fact that being significantly overweight or obese does indeed cause many problems (including diabetes, hypertension, and a host of other issues) that often result in premature death. Cardiovascular disease is the #1 killer in the US of both men and women; the number of Type II diabetics in the US has also soared over the past couple decades, including in children who used to be rare in this group. I don't condone hating on fat people, but I also don't condone pretending like rising obesity rates aren't a major cause for concern. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the author was suggesting that some fat will kill you; instead she was stating the fact that excessive fat is not good for you. I understand that overweight/obese people may feel (and rightfully so) that they&#8217;re being attacked simply for being fat &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that being significantly overweight or obese does indeed cause many problems (including diabetes, hypertension, and a host of other issues) that often result in premature death. Cardiovascular disease is the #1 killer in the US of both men and women; the number of Type II diabetics in the US has also soared over the past couple decades, including in children who used to be rare in this group. I don&#8217;t condone hating on fat people, but I also don&#8217;t condone pretending like rising obesity rates aren&#8217;t a major cause for concern. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk
Object Caching 474/474 objects using disk

Served from: www.racialicious.com @ 2012-05-16 13:05:05 -->

