Comments for Senile Delusions... http://blog.ratedsawj.com The Pensieve of a Mindless Guy Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:04:36 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on The Game Of Words… by Pinky http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2010/01/29/the-game-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10921 Pinky Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:04:36 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1160#comment-10921 err so whats the big punch/bottom line,maestro? ;) waisay i say Allah hafiz, because the God ('s name) is actually specified in it, khuda is kinda religion-neutral term.. err
so whats the big punch/bottom line,maestro?
;)

waisay i say Allah hafiz, because the God (’s name) is actually specified in it, khuda is kinda religion-neutral term..


]]> Comment on Creation Of The Universe by mohammad ali nagari http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/09/26/creation-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-10917 mohammad ali nagari Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:09:48 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1086#comment-10917 it is real thig that true people are little in this world it is real thig that true people are little in this world


]]> Comment on Creation Of The Universe by mohammad ali http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/09/26/creation-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-10916 mohammad ali Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:06:05 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1086#comment-10916 excellent jafari and hira excellent jafari and hira


]]> Comment on Creation Of The Universe by Hira http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/09/26/creation-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-10915 Hira Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:58:29 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1086#comment-10915 very true ali jafri. i second u. people think we're wrong in accepting what Muhammad (PBUH) said in his last sermon about the imamat of Hazrat Ali (A.S). the thing is they dont want to realize or accept that what they're doing is against the teachings of Holy Prophet. very true ali jafri. i second u. people think we’re wrong in accepting what Muhammad (PBUH) said in his last sermon about the imamat of Hazrat Ali (A.S). the thing is they dont want to realize or accept that what they’re doing is against the teachings of Holy Prophet.


]]> Comment on Creation Of The Universe by Syed Waseem Ahmed http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/09/26/creation-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-10906 Syed Waseem Ahmed Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:46:14 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1086#comment-10906 true true


]]> Comment on Main Kis Tarah Se Nikaloon Badan Se Jaan-e-Husain (A.S.)? by ashadali mussa http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/08/main-kis-tarah-se-nikaloon-badan-se-jaan-e-husain-as/comment-page-1/#comment-10905 ashadali mussa Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:47:57 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=717#comment-10905 amazing mashallah amazing mashallah


]]> Comment on The Game Of Words… by Haris Gulzar http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2010/01/29/the-game-of-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10873 Haris Gulzar Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:55:13 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=1160#comment-10873 First of all, I'd say it is your intention that matters. As cynic said above, Allah is a unique word, used only for the creator of this world. Khuda means god that might have plurals and masculines and feminines etc. Secondly, Allah is made up of two words, 'al', and "ilah". Al is used to convert a common noun to a proper noun, to make something unique. Like Al-kitab versus kitab (which would mean some specific book versus any book). And ilah means one who is worshiped. So 'al' and 'ilah' would mean someone specific who is worshiped, i.e. the creator of this world... First of all, I’d say it is your intention that matters. As cynic said above, Allah is a unique word, used only for the creator of this world. Khuda means god that might have plurals and masculines and feminines etc.

Secondly, Allah is made up of two words, ‘al’, and “ilah”. Al is used to convert a common noun to a proper noun, to make something unique. Like Al-kitab versus kitab (which would mean some specific book versus any book). And ilah means one who is worshiped. So ‘al’ and ‘ilah’ would mean someone specific who is worshiped, i.e. the creator of this world…


]]> Comment on Rasool-e-Ummi by Senilius http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/26/rasool-e-ummi-the-unlettered-prophet-from-makkah/comment-page-1/#comment-10872 Senilius Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:43:00 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=759#comment-10872 LOL, yaar Allama Sahab has not written Quraanic Tafseer. But he has written a lot of books on different topics such as those on personalities belonging to the Prophet's (S.A.W.W.) household, etc. This article is a shortened version of one of his printed majalis, in the book Mairaj-e-Khitabat. Do buy it, and others that you find. To know his views on the above verses, you'll have to explicitly go to him and ask. :) According to Ayatullah Khui, each Quraanic verse has one apparent tafseer and at least SEVEN hidden tafaseer! ;) After all, it is Allah's word. :D LOL, yaar Allama Sahab has not written Quraanic Tafseer. But he has written a lot of books on different topics such as those on personalities belonging to the Prophet’s (S.A.W.W.) household, etc.

This article is a shortened version of one of his printed majalis, in the book Mairaj-e-Khitabat. Do buy it, and others that you find.

To know his views on the above verses, you’ll have to explicitly go to him and ask. :)

According to Ayatullah Khui, each Quraanic verse has one apparent tafseer and at least SEVEN hidden tafaseer! ;)

After all, it is Allah’s word. :D


]]> Comment on Rasool-e-Ummi by Zahra http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/26/rasool-e-ummi-the-unlettered-prophet-from-makkah/comment-page-1/#comment-10871 Zahra Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:19:25 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=759#comment-10871 lol by debate I mean in response of my first comment you just extend your views by giving more ahadith references .....and I wanted to know the commentries of Allama sahab in above mentioned verses....and you still didn't provide. I'll inshAllah try my level best to get this book myself. :) Plus why I would mind bhui :s I'm just naive and lately started reading tafheem and that made my interest grew in reading differnt commentries of Quran. :) lol by debate I mean in response of my first comment you just extend your views by giving more ahadith references …..and I wanted to know the commentries of Allama sahab in above mentioned verses….and you still didn’t provide. I’ll inshAllah try my level best to get this book myself. :)
Plus why I would mind bhui :s I’m just naive and lately started reading tafheem and that made my interest grew in reading differnt commentries of Quran. :)


]]> Comment on Rasool-e-Ummi by Senilius http://blog.ratedsawj.com/2009/01/26/rasool-e-ummi-the-unlettered-prophet-from-makkah/comment-page-1/#comment-10869 Senilius Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:57:50 +0000 http://blog.ratedsawj.com/?p=759#comment-10869 We're not debating, we're expressing our views. :) Lets start from the beginning: Allah revealed verses containing the word Ummi. Every word of the Arabic language will have separate translation(s) in Urdu or English or any other language. Whenever you translate, you don't take the whole verse and create an Urdu meaning for it. The 'context' can easily be changed if this done. Now you can see in all verses that meaning of Ummi has been taken as illiterate/unlettered. It's not a Jewish term, it's an Arabic word. Now, terming it as a synonym of Goyim is also based on accepting it's meaning as illiterate. Which is not so, as you can see. Rasoolullah knew how to read and write from the day he came into this world. Trees used to bow over Him whenever he passed underneath. History is filled with such happenings. But Muslims are hell-bent on reducing their Prophet to nothing. (Don't take it personally, I'm not talking about you girl) Rasoolullah is Syed-ul-Anbia, he is the Master of all Prophets. That means he has to be better than all of them. Eesa speaking in his mother's arms is Eesa's quality. For Muhammad to be his Master, He must possess the same property or something better. Allah didn't make him Syed-ul-Anbia for no reason at all. As for Allama Sahab, he has studied Quraan in the light of Ahadees-e-Masoomeen, not as a stand-alone book, just as Rasoolullah ordered in the Hadees-e-Saqalain. Plus his knowledge extends over a Lot of other subjects as well. :) We’re not debating, we’re expressing our views. :)

Lets start from the beginning: Allah revealed verses containing the word Ummi. Every word of the Arabic language will have separate translation(s) in Urdu or English or any other language. Whenever you translate, you don’t take the whole verse and create an Urdu meaning for it. The ‘context’ can easily be changed if this done.

Now you can see in all verses that meaning of Ummi has been taken as illiterate/unlettered. It’s not a Jewish term, it’s an Arabic word. Now, terming it as a synonym of Goyim is also based on accepting it’s meaning as illiterate. Which is not so, as you can see.

Rasoolullah knew how to read and write from the day he came into this world. Trees used to bow over Him whenever he passed underneath. History is filled with such happenings. But Muslims are hell-bent on reducing their Prophet to nothing. (Don’t take it personally, I’m not talking about you girl)

Rasoolullah is Syed-ul-Anbia, he is the Master of all Prophets. That means he has to be better than all of them. Eesa speaking in his mother’s arms is Eesa’s quality. For Muhammad to be his Master, He must possess the same property or something better. Allah didn’t make him Syed-ul-Anbia for no reason at all.

As for Allama Sahab, he has studied Quraan in the light of Ahadees-e-Masoomeen, not as a stand-alone book, just as Rasoolullah ordered in the Hadees-e-Saqalain. Plus his knowledge extends over a Lot of other subjects as well. :)


]]>