<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sudip Bandyopadhyay's Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforsudipbandyopadhyay" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Financial Services-India by Sudip</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/DGUEZE3bvZw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=587#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Sudip says : Sudeep ,Average Indians are risk averse and equity culture has not yet spread across the length and breadth of the country. 

Till about 5 – 10 years back, fixed return instruments like NSCs, RBI Bonds, Postal Saving Schemes, etc were given good returns and Indian investors were predominantly investing in these instruments.  However, over the last few years the return from these instruments have hovered  around 8 per cent which net of tax translates to a return of around 5 per cen &amp;  with inflation  around 5 per cent on an average, deployment of funds in these traditional instruments are not yielding adequate returns.  Hence there is a need for investing in the capital market for appreciation of hard earned savings.  Retail investors are slowly realising this fact and trying to invest in the equity market either directly or through Mutual Fund Units or ULIPs of Insurance companies. 

You may also note that  a large part of the equity investments in other countries (like USA, South Korea, etc.) come from large pension and retirement funds.  Unfortunately, till recently, in India, these funds were prohibited from investing in equities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sudip says : Sudeep ,Average Indians are risk averse and equity culture has not yet spread across the length and breadth of the country. </p>
<p>Till about 5 – 10 years back, fixed return instruments like NSCs, RBI Bonds, Postal Saving Schemes, etc were given good returns and Indian investors were predominantly investing in these instruments.  However, over the last few years the return from these instruments have hovered  around 8 per cent which net of tax translates to a return of around 5 per cen &amp;  with inflation  around 5 per cent on an average, deployment of funds in these traditional instruments are not yielding adequate returns.  Hence there is a need for investing in the capital market for appreciation of hard earned savings.  Retail investors are slowly realising this fact and trying to invest in the equity market either directly or through Mutual Fund Units or ULIPs of Insurance companies. </p>
<p>You may also note that  a large part of the equity investments in other countries (like USA, South Korea, etc.) come from large pension and retirement funds.  Unfortunately, till recently, in India, these funds were prohibited from investing in equities.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/DGUEZE3bvZw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/07/20/financial-services-india/#comment-255</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Financial Services-India by Sudeep lodha</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/q_vuwzlF90c/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudeep lodha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=587#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Sir, why is there very less equity Investor in India as compared to other developed countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, why is there very less equity Investor in India as compared to other developed countries?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/q_vuwzlF90c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/07/20/financial-services-india/#comment-253</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Financial Services-India by Sudip</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/P2TXvvgqZk0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=587#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Aston, Yes.  I am in touch with Mr.Scott Slutsky.  He is a friend and a well wisher.  Of course, he is a Commodity Market Professional with significant experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aston, Yes.  I am in touch with Mr.Scott Slutsky.  He is a friend and a well wisher.  Of course, he is a Commodity Market Professional with significant experience.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/P2TXvvgqZk0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/07/20/financial-services-india/#comment-243</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Financial Services-India by Aston</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/sv-L6Uuer1s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Aston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=587#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Mr. Sudip,
Are you still in contact with Mr. Scott Slutsky of America?  I met him at a Reliance function in Jaipur?  Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Sudip,<br />
Are you still in contact with Mr. Scott Slutsky of America?  I met him at a Reliance function in Jaipur?  Thank you</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/sv-L6Uuer1s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/07/20/financial-services-india/#comment-242</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ratings…the way forward by sukumar shastri</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/i0S5XmDoRj4/</link>
		<dc:creator>sukumar shastri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=585#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Dear Sudip, policymakers in the US are now grappling with how to revamp the credit rating agencies, such as McGraw-Hill Cos Inc's (MHP.N) Standard &amp; Poor's and Moody's (MCO.N), which have been accused of contributing to the financial crisis by assigning top ratings to mortgage-backed securities that later collapsed in value. Even a Legislation has been introduced in the Senate that would allow investors to sue credit rating agencies that recklessly failed to review key information in developing a rating.

The bill introduced by Senator Jack Reed, the chairman of the Senate Banking subcommittee on securities, aims to hold rating agencies liable when it can be proven that the firms knowingly failed to review data for determining a rating based on their methodology or failed to reasonably verify data. The SEC is also looking at creating a "roadmap" to lessen reliance on credit ratings and has assigned a special squad of examiners to inspect rating agencies.

The SEC has already adopted some rules that would require more disclosures about the assets underlying mortgage-backed securities.

And the agency has proposed removing references to credit ratings in most of its rules, but the idea is strongly opposed by Wall Street.

Federal securities laws are intertwined with the credit rating agencies, with references to ratings in dozens of SEC rules.
Incidentally, 
Schapiro has also directed SEC staff to consider new rules to prevent companies from shopping around for favorable ratings.
It is also learnt that SEC staff are exploring requiring banks and other bond issuers to disclose the preliminary ratings obtained from credit rating agencies before they select the credit agency to publicly rate their product.

The SEC is also mulling requiring credit agencies to privately disclose the underlying data of structured products so that other rating agencies could provide an unsolicited rating on the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sudip, policymakers in the US are now grappling with how to revamp the credit rating agencies, such as McGraw-Hill Cos Inc&#8217;s (MHP.N) Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s and Moody&#8217;s (MCO.N), which have been accused of contributing to the financial crisis by assigning top ratings to mortgage-backed securities that later collapsed in value. Even a Legislation has been introduced in the Senate that would allow investors to sue credit rating agencies that recklessly failed to review key information in developing a rating.</p>
<p>The bill introduced by Senator Jack Reed, the chairman of the Senate Banking subcommittee on securities, aims to hold rating agencies liable when it can be proven that the firms knowingly failed to review data for determining a rating based on their methodology or failed to reasonably verify data. The SEC is also looking at creating a &#8220;roadmap&#8221; to lessen reliance on credit ratings and has assigned a special squad of examiners to inspect rating agencies.</p>
<p>The SEC has already adopted some rules that would require more disclosures about the assets underlying mortgage-backed securities.</p>
<p>And the agency has proposed removing references to credit ratings in most of its rules, but the idea is strongly opposed by Wall Street.</p>
<p>Federal securities laws are intertwined with the credit rating agencies, with references to ratings in dozens of SEC rules.<br />
Incidentally,<br />
Schapiro has also directed SEC staff to consider new rules to prevent companies from shopping around for favorable ratings.<br />
It is also learnt that SEC staff are exploring requiring banks and other bond issuers to disclose the preliminary ratings obtained from credit rating agencies before they select the credit agency to publicly rate their product.</p>
<p>The SEC is also mulling requiring credit agencies to privately disclose the underlying data of structured products so that other rating agencies could provide an unsolicited rating on the product.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/i0S5XmDoRj4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/07/17/ratingsthe-way-forward/#comment-241</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China-the future by Sudip</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/dp1fFV2jorA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=561#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Simmi, The fiscal deficit is the biggest concern.  If the same is financed through market borrowings, the economy will suffer due to significant increase in cost of funds. 

The best way to handle the deficit would be to generate funds through disinvestment of government shareholding in PSUs.  This need not change the character of these companies i.e. even while retaining 50 – 75 per cent shareholding the government can sell shares and generate huge funds for financing the deficit.  Public shareholding in PSUs,also  increase transparency and improve governance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simmi, The fiscal deficit is the biggest concern.  If the same is financed through market borrowings, the economy will suffer due to significant increase in cost of funds. </p>
<p>The best way to handle the deficit would be to generate funds through disinvestment of government shareholding in PSUs.  This need not change the character of these companies i.e. even while retaining 50 – 75 per cent shareholding the government can sell shares and generate huge funds for financing the deficit.  Public shareholding in PSUs,also  increase transparency and improve governance.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/dp1fFV2jorA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/06/26/china-the-future/#comment-237</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China-the future by Sudip</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/jOHIn7rleZY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=561#comment-236</guid>
		<description>The focus of Union budget on Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth through comprehensive rural development is a welcome step.  However, the consequent fiscal deficit is alarming. 

Considering the overall global economic scenario,while it is understandable that the government needs to spend money to stimulate demand in the economy, what disturbs the market is the consequences of such huge government borrowing . The money market,will get disturbed &amp; the interest rates will move up significantly affecting the overall economic recovery.  The budget deficit needs to be bridged through other means including PSU disinvestment.  FDI also needs to be encouraged in appropriate sectors.  

The capital markets would wait to see specific moves of the government in the direction of bridging the deficit and the sooner the government announces concrete steps the better it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The focus of Union budget on Infrastructure and Inclusive Growth through comprehensive rural development is a welcome step.  However, the consequent fiscal deficit is alarming. </p>
<p>Considering the overall global economic scenario,while it is understandable that the government needs to spend money to stimulate demand in the economy, what disturbs the market is the consequences of such huge government borrowing . The money market,will get disturbed &amp; the interest rates will move up significantly affecting the overall economic recovery.  The budget deficit needs to be bridged through other means including PSU disinvestment.  FDI also needs to be encouraged in appropriate sectors.  </p>
<p>The capital markets would wait to see specific moves of the government in the direction of bridging the deficit and the sooner the government announces concrete steps the better it is.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/jOHIn7rleZY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/06/26/china-the-future/#comment-236</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China-the future by simmi harding</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/5d6w0FKCMuQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>simmi harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=561#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Dear Sudip

now that the budget's also come in and the resultant bashing has started by the opposition parties...what in your opinion is the single biggest fiscal measure and discipline that the government must take to take the country forward...
many thanks...also, you've stopped writing I guess...pls don't do that....it keeps us in the US cluend on to what's happening especially with your analysis et al...regards
simmi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sudip</p>
<p>now that the budget&#8217;s also come in and the resultant bashing has started by the opposition parties&#8230;what in your opinion is the single biggest fiscal measure and discipline that the government must take to take the country forward&#8230;<br />
many thanks&#8230;also, you&#8217;ve stopped writing I guess&#8230;pls don&#8217;t do that&#8230;.it keeps us in the US cluend on to what&#8217;s happening especially with your analysis et al&#8230;regards<br />
simmi</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/5d6w0FKCMuQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/06/26/china-the-future/#comment-235</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China-the future by Sandeep Chhajed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/PtFOsoOKdO8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Chhajed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=561#comment-233</guid>
		<description>First take on Union Budget 2009-2010

Sir would request your comments on this article.

The much-awaited Union Budget was presented today in the parliament by Finance Minister Mr. Pranab Mukherjee.

Markets anticipated few major announcements from the FM on various measures like concerns on growing fiscal deficit, disinvestment, GST, STT, FBT, FDI, reforms on BFSI segment, sops for education / real estate, etc. Post the budget presentation by the FM, the major issues on fiscal deficit and divestment still remained unanswered. 

Although we believe abolition of FBT, CTT and introduction of GST are good moves. At the start of the speech FM mentioned ‘One budget can’t solve all the problems’. We take this statement as a positive note and a first step towards ensuring a gradual and sustained growth in the long term. This has been complimented by measures like higher emphasis on maintaining GDP growth of 9%, agriculture growth of 4%, higher allocation for infrastructure development via NHAI, IIFCL, APDRP, RGGVY, National Gas Grid, etc. This enhances our belief that government has a focus on development.

The key concern has been the growing fiscal deficit which has further been proposed to be higher at 6.8% of GDP. The FM has not touched on the roadmap to either reduce the fiscal deficit or on the sources to raise further money via divestment / 3G auctions. Although the government is targeting to raise money of Rs 25,000 crores via divestment, Rs 35,000 crores via 3G auction and some more via NELP VIII licenses sale. This would to an extent reduce the pressure build by burgeoning fiscal deficit. Removal of FBT will lead to a loss of around Rs 10,000 crores in revenue which would partly be compensated by 5% additional MAT proposed on companies.

Overall we believe the budget was focused on achieving economic development and a sustainable growth. But higher expectations were led by lack of announcements on measures to reduce fiscal deficit, divestment, reforms for BFSI, FDI policy has not gone well for the markets. And the result was major indices tumbled with Sensex and Nifty down nearly 6% each.

There has been lot of voices on disappointment from the budget. But I would like to raise one point here that is: Did FM had any other way to reduce the fiscal deficit? If at all he had touched the tax structure .. Was India Inc ready for tax rate hikes (direct or indirect)? The answer is simply No. Although India has not been much affected by the global turmoil but there has been an overall slowdown across sectors with negative growths coming in. 

The focus of FM clearly was first to bring back the economy on growth trajectory and then look at issues like reduction of fiscal deficit.

By Sandeep Chhajed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First take on Union Budget 2009-2010</p>
<p>Sir would request your comments on this article.</p>
<p>The much-awaited Union Budget was presented today in the parliament by Finance Minister Mr. Pranab Mukherjee.</p>
<p>Markets anticipated few major announcements from the FM on various measures like concerns on growing fiscal deficit, disinvestment, GST, STT, FBT, FDI, reforms on BFSI segment, sops for education / real estate, etc. Post the budget presentation by the FM, the major issues on fiscal deficit and divestment still remained unanswered. </p>
<p>Although we believe abolition of FBT, CTT and introduction of GST are good moves. At the start of the speech FM mentioned ‘One budget can’t solve all the problems’. We take this statement as a positive note and a first step towards ensuring a gradual and sustained growth in the long term. This has been complimented by measures like higher emphasis on maintaining GDP growth of 9%, agriculture growth of 4%, higher allocation for infrastructure development via NHAI, IIFCL, APDRP, RGGVY, National Gas Grid, etc. This enhances our belief that government has a focus on development.</p>
<p>The key concern has been the growing fiscal deficit which has further been proposed to be higher at 6.8% of GDP. The FM has not touched on the roadmap to either reduce the fiscal deficit or on the sources to raise further money via divestment / 3G auctions. Although the government is targeting to raise money of Rs 25,000 crores via divestment, Rs 35,000 crores via 3G auction and some more via NELP VIII licenses sale. This would to an extent reduce the pressure build by burgeoning fiscal deficit. Removal of FBT will lead to a loss of around Rs 10,000 crores in revenue which would partly be compensated by 5% additional MAT proposed on companies.</p>
<p>Overall we believe the budget was focused on achieving economic development and a sustainable growth. But higher expectations were led by lack of announcements on measures to reduce fiscal deficit, divestment, reforms for BFSI, FDI policy has not gone well for the markets. And the result was major indices tumbled with Sensex and Nifty down nearly 6% each.</p>
<p>There has been lot of voices on disappointment from the budget. But I would like to raise one point here that is: Did FM had any other way to reduce the fiscal deficit? If at all he had touched the tax structure .. Was India Inc ready for tax rate hikes (direct or indirect)? The answer is simply No. Although India has not been much affected by the global turmoil but there has been an overall slowdown across sectors with negative growths coming in. </p>
<p>The focus of FM clearly was first to bring back the economy on growth trajectory and then look at issues like reduction of fiscal deficit.</p>
<p>By Sandeep Chhajed</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/PtFOsoOKdO8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/06/26/china-the-future/#comment-233</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Aid Debate by shrutidhar</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~3/Kpq2voxMCP8/</link>
		<dc:creator>shrutidhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/?p=559#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Dear jignesh

you can catch the blogging action also at sudip.bigadda.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear jignesh</p>
<p>you can catch the blogging action also at sudip.bigadda.com</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForSudipBandyopadhyay/~4/Kpq2voxMCP8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.sudipbandyopadhyay.in/2009/06/09/the-aid-debate/#comment-229</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

