Additionally, I was wondering if anyone knows how to get this to work with virtual hosts. Bear with me as I try to explain using my half-baked knowledge of Apache/Networking.

The above works fine for anything I might have at “http://localhost/” but I usually have two to three projects hosted on my Mac and I like to use virtual host aliases (?terminology?) that I can access at something like “http://project1/” & “http://project2/” — is there way to access these virutalhosts using this same trick?

To bad we still have to make an effort to fix that broken piece of #($&*#$ browser ,but your solutions is great, and makes it behave just as all proper browsers.

But you made my daY !

SSLRandomSeed startup builtin
SSLRandomSeed connect builtin
SSLOptions -FakeBasicAuth -ExportCertData -StrictRequire -StdEnvVars

Do you know if there is a way to determine if the ssl information is/is not being sent to the adaptor?

[snip]
Radar #2280881
Concurrent multithreaded saves may bypass optimistic locking check.
Description:
Although it has not yet been verified, EOF may have a brief window where two sessions modifying the same
object will get last-one-wins behavior, instead of a merge (which is still last-one-wins at the attribute level).
For example:
Editing context 1 locks, modifies object 1
Editing context 2 locks, modifies object 1
Editing context 1 saves changes, unlocks, change notification enqueued on editing context 1
Editing context 2 saves its modifications to object 1 without merging in editing context 1’s modifications.
Workaround:
None.
[/snip]

Here is my final workaround (IE6, IE7). You need to insert the objet in the elements, and then re-affect the name. This seems to record the iframe

- frame = createElement(‘iframe’
- frame.id = “my_new_frame”;
– frame.name = ” my_new_frame”;
- insert element in the document
– (the iframe is known as a document element), re-set the name:

if (document.frames) {
document.frames['my_new_frame'].name = “my_new_frame”;
}

Thanks!

Why should you use WO? We could have a very long discussion about that, but for me, it’s mostly about the tools you use adapt to your mindset, and the way you think. I tried a lot of web technologies before, including some “radical” ones, like LISP frameworks, and none of them made sense to me. All of them seemed wrong, poorly built, and above all, in my opinion, their model didn’t seem feet to the purpose. When I saw WO, I saw a framework that was built in the way I think it makes sense. It’s not easy to learn, and it has it’s issues, but all of it makes sense. Just like Cocoa, for the desktop, it’s not something that you can learn and feel confortable with in a few minutes or days, but just like Cocoa, it’s well worth the effort.

So, essentially I use WO because it makes sense to me, because it’s very well tested and mature code, because it’s very fast (today’s JVMs are much, much faster than perl or ruby interpretation), and because it offers very high security out of the box.

You should post this to the mailing lists and on the wiki :-)