<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Imagined Universe</title>
	
	<link>http://elekhni.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsfortheimagineduniverse" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Why Grand Slams should never have a 5th set tie break by Dave</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/5wqtA5Ggq3A/</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/2009/07/why-wimbledon-should-never-have-a-5th-set-tie-break/#comment-55066</guid>
		<description>I agree and disagree with everyone. The problem is that we have two serves in the new power racket era. There should only be one serve. It would get rid of "holding serve". You would have to spin your old second serve in making even chances for both sides. It would get rid of inferior players who are superior servers winning matches because they get too many cheap points on serve and also are able to erase hard earned break points. Unfortunately Sampras would be a nobody and Federer would of only won 5 or 6 slams (but Federer would still be the best ever with Laver). Agassi was better but if he can't break the guy he's going to lose while Sampras could relax and swing away on his return knowing that he can easily hold serve. 

Anyway 70 to 68 Isner match would of never happened because they both would have to rally and would not be able to easily defend their serves with so many cheap points. 

Players don't serve and volley anymore because either their serve is a winner or if the opponent has a decent play on the ball will likely hit a very difficult power spin return that would be difficult to volley.

Another wonderful side benefit would be that it saves time wasted after a fault.

Get rid of the over weighted serve stroke that the opponent cannot do anything about and emphasis on holding serve. 

Right now we need the tie breaker. But get rid of the easy hold and you could get rid of it.

So there that is the answer. Ok a little arrogant sounding sorry.

  Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and disagree with everyone. The problem is that we have two serves in the new power racket era. There should only be one serve. It would get rid of &#8220;holding serve&#8221;. You would have to spin your old second serve in making even chances for both sides. It would get rid of inferior players who are superior servers winning matches because they get too many cheap points on serve and also are able to erase hard earned break points. Unfortunately Sampras would be a nobody and Federer would of only won 5 or 6 slams (but Federer would still be the best ever with Laver). Agassi was better but if he can&#8217;t break the guy he&#8217;s going to lose while Sampras could relax and swing away on his return knowing that he can easily hold serve. </p>
<p>Anyway 70 to 68 Isner match would of never happened because they both would have to rally and would not be able to easily defend their serves with so many cheap points. </p>
<p>Players don&#8217;t serve and volley anymore because either their serve is a winner or if the opponent has a decent play on the ball will likely hit a very difficult power spin return that would be difficult to volley.</p>
<p>Another wonderful side benefit would be that it saves time wasted after a fault.</p>
<p>Get rid of the over weighted serve stroke that the opponent cannot do anything about and emphasis on holding serve. </p>
<p>Right now we need the tie breaker. But get rid of the easy hold and you could get rid of it.</p>
<p>So there that is the answer. Ok a little arrogant sounding sorry.</p>
<p>  Dave</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/5wqtA5Ggq3A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/07/why-wimbledon-should-never-have-a-5th-set-tie-break/comment-page-1/#comment-55066</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to add a custom header for the Arras theme by LedLennon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/-QbDS_dVEws/</link>
		<dc:creator>LedLennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1971#comment-54342</guid>
		<description>Well, I've found the problem, it was just a problem of editing of the user.css. Don't mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve found the problem, it was just a problem of editing of the user.css. Don&#8217;t mind&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/-QbDS_dVEws" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/how-to-add-a-custom-header-for-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-54342</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to add a custom header for the Arras theme by LedLennon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/lxXoL-9fVPQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>LedLennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1971#comment-54310</guid>
		<description>Ciao to all!
There is any limitation about the images used in the style? For example, I tried to substitute the topnav.jpg with another jpeg, but it doesn't show. Is there any rule that I have to follow? Size? Number of colors?
After, I will try to modify also the header :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ciao to all!<br />
There is any limitation about the images used in the style? For example, I tried to substitute the topnav.jpg with another jpeg, but it doesn&#8217;t show. Is there any rule that I have to follow? Size? Number of colors?<br />
After, I will try to modify also the header <img src='http://elekhni.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/lxXoL-9fVPQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/how-to-add-a-custom-header-for-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-54310</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The mystery of the dejected Hardy Boys author by Lekhni</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/8m6vLXMnedc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lekhni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=2704#comment-54274</guid>
		<description>Oh, did he?  I didn't know that.  I looked up Mills &amp; Boon's website, and it turns out you are right that PG Wodehouse's books were published by Mills &amp; Boon during its first years as a general publisher (before they switched exclusively to romance).   

So what I am not clear is - was a Wodehouse book (like say, Code of the Woosters) published by M&amp;B, or did Wodehouse write specifically for the Mills &amp; Boon audience ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, did he?  I didn&#8217;t know that.  I looked up Mills &amp; Boon&#8217;s website, and it turns out you are right that PG Wodehouse&#8217;s books were published by Mills &amp; Boon during its first years as a general publisher (before they switched exclusively to romance).   </p>
<p>So what I am not clear is &#8211; was a Wodehouse book (like say, Code of the Woosters) published by M&amp;B, or did Wodehouse write specifically for the Mills &amp; Boon audience ?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/8m6vLXMnedc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2010/08/the-mystery-of-the-dejected-hardy-boys-author/comment-page-1/#comment-54274</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The mystery of the dejected Hardy Boys author by Rishi S.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/Fscw-G2D3Pk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=2704#comment-53949</guid>
		<description>Even Wodehouse wrote Mills N Boon, didn't he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Wodehouse wrote Mills N Boon, didn&#8217;t he?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/Fscw-G2D3Pk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2010/08/the-mystery-of-the-dejected-hardy-boys-author/comment-page-1/#comment-53949</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customizing the Arras theme by Lekhni</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/7T419DlNFKU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lekhni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1830#comment-52456</guid>
		<description>I'm still too nervous to upgrade to 1.4.3.1 and your comment only reinforces that :( 1.4.2 seems to work fine for me, so I'm sticking to it.  Why spend hours customizing and troubleshooting 1.4.3.1 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still too nervous to upgrade to 1.4.3.1 and your comment only reinforces that <img src='http://elekhni.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  1.4.2 seems to work fine for me, so I&#8217;m sticking to it.  Why spend hours customizing and troubleshooting 1.4.3.1 ?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/7T419DlNFKU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/customizing-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-52456</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customizing the Arras theme by ak</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/myytJBb5v3Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>ak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1830#comment-52351</guid>
		<description>What Navigation Tab? There isn't one in the 1.4.3.1 version. My Pages have all changed and the Nav bar still shows pages that do not exist anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Navigation Tab? There isn&#8217;t one in the 1.4.3.1 version. My Pages have all changed and the Nav bar still shows pages that do not exist anymore.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/myytJBb5v3Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/customizing-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-52351</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to add a custom header for the Arras theme by Lekhni</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/XzOrd-eXzR0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Lekhni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1971#comment-50844</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is how the theme is designed.  You can try increasing the width from 960 to 1000 or so, but if I remember correctly, that does not work.  The other way is to just change the header background from white to a color picked from your banner, so there is continuity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is how the theme is designed.  You can try increasing the width from 960 to 1000 or so, but if I remember correctly, that does not work.  The other way is to just change the header background from white to a color picked from your banner, so there is continuity.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/XzOrd-eXzR0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/how-to-add-a-custom-header-for-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-50844</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to add a custom header for the Arras theme by Syahir</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~3/ptUSQ1Agu7o/</link>
		<dc:creator>Syahir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1971#comment-50714</guid>
		<description>owh,ok. But, when I put the banner according to your step, the banner just utilise at the centre of the header.how if I want to make the banner full utilised the black background on the header? 
This is my website:  www.warwickisoc.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>owh,ok. But, when I put the banner according to your step, the banner just utilise at the centre of the header.how if I want to make the banner full utilised the black background on the header?<br />
This is my website:  <a href="http://www.warwickisoc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.warwickisoc.co.uk</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForTheImaginedUniverse/~4/ptUSQ1Agu7o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://elekhni.com/2009/11/how-to-add-a-custom-header-for-the-arras-theme/comment-page-1/#comment-50714</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.325 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-07 17:22:54 -->
