Comments for The ServerSide Interoperability Blog http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:03:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0 Comment on Mini-Guide: Apache Web Services by budget silk wedding flowers http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/05/18/mini-guide-apache-web-services-2/#comment-3626 Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:33:14 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/05/18/mini-guide-apache-web-services-2/#comment-3626 <strong>budget silk wedding flowers</strong> Sometimes you can say it all with flowers, actions speak louder than words. budget silk wedding flowers
Sometimes you can say it all with flowers, actions speak louder than words.


]]> Comment on .NET StockTrader and J2EE Interoperability by Inside The Lab : Other Musings http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/14/net-stocktrader-and-j2ee-interoperability/#comment-1393 Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:04:30 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/14/net-stocktrader-and-j2ee-interoperability/#comment-1393 [...] Other Musings More information on .NET StockTrader 1.0 here on the ServerSide Interoperability blog, http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/14/net-stocktrader-and-j2ee-interoperability/.  Also, check out the articles that was written by Tom Yager, http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/06/, as well as from eWEEK, http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Inside-the-Microsoft-Interop-Lab/, and http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Whats-in-a-Benchmark/. Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:23 AM by gregleak@microsoft.com [...] […] Other Musings More information on .NET StockTrader 1.0 here on the ServerSide Interoperability blog, http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/14/net-stocktrader-and-j2ee-interoperability/.  Also, check out the articles that was written by Tom Yager, http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/06/, as well as from eWEEK, http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Inside-the-Microsoft-Interop-Lab/, and http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/Whats-in-a-Benchmark/. Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:23 AM by gregleak@microsoft.com […]


]]> Comment on What is SOA test? Parasoft SOAtest 5.5 has a notion by Uday Kumar http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/19/what-is-soa-test-parasoft-soatest-55-has-a-notion/#comment-1215 Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:50:54 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/19/what-is-soa-test-parasoft-soatest-55-has-a-notion/#comment-1215 How parasoft's SOATest is compete with HP's Service Test??? How to get the evaluation version of this software. Here i am not able to get the evaluation version of both of the softwares. If any anybody knows the URL for evaluation version of these softwares please send the URLs to udayanem@gmail.com How parasoft’s SOATest is compete with HP’s Service Test???

How to get the evaluation version of this software. Here i am not able to get the evaluation version of both of the softwares.

If any anybody knows the URL for evaluation version of these softwares please send the URLs to udayanem@gmail.com


]]> Comment on DSLs: Let a hundred languages spring forth by Vivek Saxena http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/07/dsls-let-a-hundred-languages-spring-forth/#comment-1117 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:20:26 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/07/dsls-let-a-hundred-languages-spring-forth/#comment-1117 How are DSLs different compared to Patterns? Or are they Patterns which have been implemented? How are DSLs different compared to Patterns? Or are they Patterns which have been implemented?


]]> Comment on Contract-First or Code-First Design - Part 1 by Contract-First or Code-First service design; does anybody care? - Service Endpoint http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/contract-first-or-code-first-design-part-1/#comment-1050 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:32:48 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/contract-first-or-code-first-design-part-1/#comment-1050 [...] The advantages of going with contract-first is certainly evident when it comes to interoperability. I remember reading an interesting article about the Contract-first vs Code-first debate a while ago. At the time it was published, I remember thinking to myself that both sides seem to have very valid points, but, Ted Neward, whom I have great regard for, an evangelist for interoperability, was dissing the idea of contract first. Why? [...] […] The advantages of going with contract-first is certainly evident when it comes to interoperability. I remember reading an interesting article about the Contract-first vs Code-first debate a while ago. At the time it was published, I remember thinking to myself that both sides seem to have very valid points, but, Ted Neward, whom I have great regard for, an evangelist for interoperability, was dissing the idea of contract first. Why? […]


]]> Comment on Is Ruby the New VB? by Nis Wilson Nissen http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/30/is-ruby-the-new-vb/#comment-1024 Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:03:37 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/30/is-ruby-the-new-vb/#comment-1024 @emvee "real programmers use real programming languages" - please name what you consider real programming languages. Anyway, please take a look at the following talks / presentations to get better understanding why Ruby is becoming more popular: Via InfoQ: Fred George - Applying Agile to Ruby http://www.infoq.com/presentations/applying-agile-to-ruby Via Channel9: Dave Thomas and Erik Meier: http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=349220 Chad Fowler and Bob Martin: http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=350187 Cheers, Nis @emvee “real programmers use real programming languages” - please name what you consider real programming languages.

Anyway, please take a look at the following talks / presentations to get better understanding why Ruby is becoming more popular:

Via InfoQ:

Fred George - Applying Agile to Ruby
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/applying-agile-to-ruby

Via Channel9:

Dave Thomas and Erik Meier:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=349220

Chad Fowler and Bob Martin:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=350187

Cheers,
Nis


]]> Comment on Python Mini-Learning Guide by Sergey Lipnevich http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/15/python-mini-learning-guide/#comment-1010 Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:09:48 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/15/python-mini-learning-guide/#comment-1010 This is a nice collection of links but it's dominated by one flavor of Python over others. I think the title of this article should be <i>IronPython Mini-Learning Guide</i> :-). This is a nice collection of links but it’s dominated by one flavor of Python over others. I think the title of this article should be IronPython Mini-Learning Guide :-).


]]> Comment on Stateful Web Services - They really work! by Phil Barr http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/06/04/stateful-web-services-they-really-work/#comment-999 Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:51:49 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/06/04/stateful-web-services-they-really-work/#comment-999 Having used the "Add Service" functionality you mention, I've noticed that depending on the WSDL you import, sometimes the code generated won't compile. This seems to be due to duplicate code being generated, so I've just been commenting it out. Seems to work so far....! Having used the “Add Service” functionality you mention, I’ve noticed that depending on the WSDL you import, sometimes the code generated won’t compile. This seems to be due to duplicate code being generated, so I’ve just been commenting it out. Seems to work so far….!


]]> Comment on The Messaging Way : MSMQ & JMS by Old -timer http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/03/15/the-messaging-way-msmq-jms/#comment-996 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:14:22 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/03/15/the-messaging-way-msmq-jms/#comment-996 The assertion that MSMQ is ubiquitous is simply nonsense. It only runs on Windows OS flavours. JMS implementations on the other hand run on any OS for which there's a Java Virtual Machine. Noter however that no two JMS implementations have to be able to interoperate. That's just missing from the spec. Also more ubiquitous is IBM's WebSphere MQ. It runs on something over 40 different operating systems, including all the Windows ones, most Linux, many Unix and several mainframes. The assertion that MSMQ is ubiquitous is simply nonsense. It only runs on Windows OS flavours. JMS implementations on the other hand run on any OS for which there’s a Java Virtual Machine. Noter however that no two JMS implementations have to be able to interoperate. That’s just missing from the spec. Also more ubiquitous is IBM’s WebSphere MQ. It runs on something over 40 different operating systems, including all the Windows ones, most Linux, many Unix and several mainframes.


]]> Comment on What is SOA test? Parasoft SOAtest 5.5 has a notion by Wayne Ariola http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/19/what-is-soa-test-parasoft-soatest-55-has-a-notion/#comment-833 Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:24:16 +0000 http://tssblog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/19/what-is-soa-test-parasoft-soatest-55-has-a-notion/#comment-833 Please note the the above commentator Mackay is an employee of a competitor to Parasoft SOAtest. This commentator is an employee of Parasoft. I appreciate Mr. Mackay highlighting additional Parasoft SOAtest capabilities that were obviously not mentioned in this very nice blog. I agree with Mr. Mackay that Parasoft SOAtest features around heterogeneity, governance, and virtual test environments should have been mentioned but were not. Please note the the above commentator Mackay is an employee of a competitor to Parasoft SOAtest. This commentator is an employee of Parasoft. I appreciate Mr. Mackay highlighting additional Parasoft SOAtest capabilities that were obviously not mentioned in this very nice blog. I agree with Mr. Mackay that Parasoft SOAtest features around heterogeneity, governance, and virtual test environments should have been mentioned but were not.


]]>