<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</title>
	
	<link>http://www.guitartoybox.com</link>
	<description>See the world through the eyes of a guitarist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsGuitartoybox" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsguitartoybox" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Matt Stevens by Matt Stevens</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/xZ22HDj6-YI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1906#comment-10724</guid>
		<description>Thanks loads for posting this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks loads for posting this</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/xZ22HDj6-YI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-02-22/matt-stevens/comment-page-1/#comment-10724</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gibson celebrates itself again by Jon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/KPMeR_F4fA0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1887#comment-10717</guid>
		<description>It is incredibly beautiful though i would love this in my collection... But that would be greedy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is incredibly beautiful though i would love this in my collection&#8230; But that would be greedy!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/KPMeR_F4fA0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-02-16/gibson-celebrates-itself-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10717</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Search For The Best Guitarist You Have Never Heard Of by Never Heard Of... Tex Boarder | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/ySSYo69_TYg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Never Heard Of... Tex Boarder | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1657#comment-10715</guid>
		<description>[...]  Have you submitted your entry yet? Full details on this world-wide search are available right here!    If you liked this, please share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Have you submitted your entry yet? Full details on this world-wide search are available right here!    If you liked this, please share [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/ySSYo69_TYg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-01/2010-search-for-the-best-guitarist-you-have-never-heard-of/comment-page-1/#comment-10715</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Secret Of The Universe Is…. by Matt Stevens</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/Rz7DFERcIns/</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1830#comment-10706</guid>
		<description>Love Townsend - saw him with SYL once with Gene Hoglan on drums - incredible stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love Townsend &#8211; saw him with SYL once with Gene Hoglan on drums &#8211; incredible stuff</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/Rz7DFERcIns" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-26/the-secret-of-the-universe-is/comment-page-1/#comment-10706</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Melissa Auf der Maur Premieres New Video by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/dUi-JkSZaak/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1801#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>She was all of those. In fact with the harmonies she provided on Celebrity Skin, that album would have been awful. In fact, I think we could remix the album and remove Courntey Love completely it would have been great. Didn't Billy Corgan write most of it anyway? 

But true, I guess my recollection going back to being a 15 year old boy when the album came out is a little "clouded". Needless to say though, I can't wait for this album/project. I wish more artists would try to cross that line between simple music as expression, and realising the music can be used as just a part of an overall creative output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was all of those. In fact with the harmonies she provided on Celebrity Skin, that album would have been awful. In fact, I think we could remix the album and remove Courntey Love completely it would have been great. Didn&#8217;t Billy Corgan write most of it anyway? </p>
<p>But true, I guess my recollection going back to being a 15 year old boy when the album came out is a little &#8220;clouded&#8221;. Needless to say though, I can&#8217;t wait for this album/project. I wish more artists would try to cross that line between simple music as expression, and realising the music can be used as just a part of an overall creative output.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/dUi-JkSZaak" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-20/melissa-auf-der-maur-premieres-new-video/comment-page-1/#comment-10665</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Melissa Auf der Maur Premieres New Video by WillingEnabler</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/fuUhEqt3LGU/</link>
		<dc:creator>WillingEnabler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1801#comment-10658</guid>
		<description>I suppose there are worse things than being the "Hot One" from Hole, but probably there are better things :  the "Arty One" from Hole, the "Canadian One" from Hole, or the "Arty, Canadian, Risk-Taking, Dream-Digging, super-creative hot one from Hole."

But hey- coverage is coverage. Thanks for posting this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose there are worse things than being the &#8220;Hot One&#8221; from Hole, but probably there are better things :  the &#8220;Arty One&#8221; from Hole, the &#8220;Canadian One&#8221; from Hole, or the &#8220;Arty, Canadian, Risk-Taking, Dream-Digging, super-creative hot one from Hole.&#8221;</p>
<p>But hey- coverage is coverage. Thanks for posting this <img src='http://www.guitartoybox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/fuUhEqt3LGU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-20/melissa-auf-der-maur-premieres-new-video/comment-page-1/#comment-10658</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the relic fad should just die. by Tim</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/nmC7t1vN1Ms/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1258#comment-10644</guid>
		<description>Yes, the relic craze is simply an extension of the worn jeans concept. I wonder who buys these instruments, as I've never seen any real musicians using them? Must be the same folks that made Harley Davidson a fashion item. Weekend warriors, posers, folks with more money then brains. I'm most amused by the proliferation of discussion regarding the qualities that make relics so popular, though I'm not at all convinced they are really as popular as Fender makes them out to be. This is an obvious attempt by Fender marketing to leverage on the increasingly high price of real vintage instruments. I can almost understand why some folks might like the worn look, but I can't buy any of arguments that suggest these instrument are in any way superior to a non-relic. So what are you paying for?

1. Labor to create the illusion of age. However, relic instruments do not look authentic when closely inspected. The really expensive ones are more convincing, but anyone knowledgeable will not be fooled.

2. Better sound and feel. People willing to spend the ridiculous bucks Fender is asking will always say these instruments play better or feel better. Why? Because they have to rationalize their idiotic purchase.

3. Then, there is the rap on thin nitro lacquer. The finish on a solid body electric guitar has very little effect on the tone, period. It is mostly the wood, pickups, bridge, etc.. that make the difference.

4. The guitar was assembled by a master. Masterbuilt by some fucker you have never heard of. I suppose the master does some amazing special mojo when he/she screws the neck on or installs the  tuners. Something different and very expensive... Maybe majic dust!

5. Something special! Who are you kidding? Do you think Fender uses a special CNC machine for the custom shop necks and bodies? If so, you are in idiot.

What you are paying for is simply a standard instrument with a fucked up finish, and the master builder doesn't have to worry a bit about scratches or dings while assembling. Enjoy sucker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the relic craze is simply an extension of the worn jeans concept. I wonder who buys these instruments, as I&#8217;ve never seen any real musicians using them? Must be the same folks that made Harley Davidson a fashion item. Weekend warriors, posers, folks with more money then brains. I&#8217;m most amused by the proliferation of discussion regarding the qualities that make relics so popular, though I&#8217;m not at all convinced they are really as popular as Fender makes them out to be. This is an obvious attempt by Fender marketing to leverage on the increasingly high price of real vintage instruments. I can almost understand why some folks might like the worn look, but I can&#8217;t buy any of arguments that suggest these instrument are in any way superior to a non-relic. So what are you paying for?</p>
<p>1. Labor to create the illusion of age. However, relic instruments do not look authentic when closely inspected. The really expensive ones are more convincing, but anyone knowledgeable will not be fooled.</p>
<p>2. Better sound and feel. People willing to spend the ridiculous bucks Fender is asking will always say these instruments play better or feel better. Why? Because they have to rationalize their idiotic purchase.</p>
<p>3. Then, there is the rap on thin nitro lacquer. The finish on a solid body electric guitar has very little effect on the tone, period. It is mostly the wood, pickups, bridge, etc.. that make the difference.</p>
<p>4. The guitar was assembled by a master. Masterbuilt by some fucker you have never heard of. I suppose the master does some amazing special mojo when he/she screws the neck on or installs the  tuners. Something different and very expensive&#8230; Maybe majic dust!</p>
<p>5. Something special! Who are you kidding? Do you think Fender uses a special CNC machine for the custom shop necks and bodies? If so, you are in idiot.</p>
<p>What you are paying for is simply a standard instrument with a fucked up finish, and the master builder doesn&#8217;t have to worry a bit about scratches or dings while assembling. Enjoy sucker!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/nmC7t1vN1Ms" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2009-01-10/why-the-relic-fad-should-just-die/comment-page-1/#comment-10644</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructional videos thought. by Bob</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/-RabQTmWOa8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitartoybox.com/?p=498#comment-10635</guid>
		<description>I purchased Never Going Back Again and am totally dissatisfied.  The teacher is awful, not an accomplished guitarist, and can't even tune his guitar.  The "lesson" is not note for note as it does not contain a key riff played by Lindsay Buckingham.  When I expressed my desire to return the product they said no.  I advise any aspiring guitarist to not purchase any of their crap and have suggested they change their name to "NOT4US".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased Never Going Back Again and am totally dissatisfied.  The teacher is awful, not an accomplished guitarist, and can&#8217;t even tune his guitar.  The &#8220;lesson&#8221; is not note for note as it does not contain a key riff played by Lindsay Buckingham.  When I expressed my desire to return the product they said no.  I advise any aspiring guitarist to not purchase any of their crap and have suggested they change their name to &#8220;NOT4US&#8221;.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/-RabQTmWOa8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2008-04-14/instructional-videos-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-10635</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the relic fad should just die. by Fastelder</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/EtIDZ0aychU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Fastelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1258#comment-10632</guid>
		<description>Amen to all that.

Anyone who can't see the "relic" look for the gimmick it is, DESERVES to be parted with his money.  If I'm plunking down some serious cash, I want the benefit of the shiny and new.  You are right about the character that goes into aging an instrument over time.  LET ME DO IT! Paying extra just to have somebody in the factory beat it up makes no sense.  

I'm so dis-enchanted with the zillion plus versions out there. This just proves that fender has run out of ideas.  And speaking of all the versions out there, it just makes sense anymore to find a decent MIM, slap a loaded pickguard into it and enjoy your SRV special and use the money you save to buy more toys.  

As far as the relic craze dying, don't hold your breath - pre-faded jeans haven't gone away yet.

Fastelder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to all that.</p>
<p>Anyone who can&#8217;t see the &#8220;relic&#8221; look for the gimmick it is, DESERVES to be parted with his money.  If I&#8217;m plunking down some serious cash, I want the benefit of the shiny and new.  You are right about the character that goes into aging an instrument over time.  LET ME DO IT! Paying extra just to have somebody in the factory beat it up makes no sense.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m so dis-enchanted with the zillion plus versions out there. This just proves that fender has run out of ideas.  And speaking of all the versions out there, it just makes sense anymore to find a decent MIM, slap a loaded pickguard into it and enjoy your SRV special and use the money you save to buy more toys.  </p>
<p>As far as the relic craze dying, don&#8217;t hold your breath &#8211; pre-faded jeans haven&#8217;t gone away yet.</p>
<p>Fastelder</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/EtIDZ0aychU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2009-01-10/why-the-relic-fad-should-just-die/comment-page-1/#comment-10632</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rob Arnold of Chimaira – Tour Rig Demo by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/rWuAsMOS74k/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1817#comment-10629</guid>
		<description>Damn dude, that's awesome. The video was really cool. I've been getting back into heavy stuff lately, now I'm gonna check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn dude, that&#8217;s awesome. The video was really cool. I&#8217;ve been getting back into heavy stuff lately, now I&#8217;m gonna check them out.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/rWuAsMOS74k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-26/rob-arnold-of-chimaira-tour-rig-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-10629</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rob Arnold of Chimaira – Tour Rig Demo by Jon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/kilu_K3ECKM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1817#comment-10624</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the plug Rob was kind enough to put me on the guest list for the gig and the after show meet and greet. Seriously he went out of his way to help me out considering he didn't know me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the plug Rob was kind enough to put me on the guest list for the gig and the after show meet and greet. Seriously he went out of his way to help me out considering he didn&#8217;t know me!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/kilu_K3ECKM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-26/rob-arnold-of-chimaira-tour-rig-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-10624</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the relic fad should just die. by Jim</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/UpLHCMwOOOA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1258#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>Hey man you if don't like it don't buy one. The fact is since the late 70's Fenders have been coated in POLYURETHANE...perhaps you've heard of it. They make bowling balls out of it, it will NOT age in the traditional sense. Unlike original nitro, or polyester the most you'll get is a slight yellowing. Few people want to spend good money to buy a guitar then abuse their guitars like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum and launching it into a stack at the end of a show to make it look "worn."(Very Original by the way)Now whether they planned it this way long ago or it was just a stroke of marketing luck, the roadworn series essentially makes guitars available that are comparable to what used Fenders from the 80's and 90's would look like by now had they not been encased in a bulletproof shell. If their not for you that's cool, having a professional "posed" photo of me doing jumping splits WITHOUT MY GUITAR EVEN BEING PLUGGED INTO ANYTHING isn't for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man you if don&#8217;t like it don&#8217;t buy one. The fact is since the late 70&#8217;s Fenders have been coated in POLYURETHANE&#8230;perhaps you&#8217;ve heard of it. They make bowling balls out of it, it will NOT age in the traditional sense. Unlike original nitro, or polyester the most you&#8217;ll get is a slight yellowing. Few people want to spend good money to buy a guitar then abuse their guitars like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum and launching it into a stack at the end of a show to make it look &#8220;worn.&#8221;(Very Original by the way)Now whether they planned it this way long ago or it was just a stroke of marketing luck, the roadworn series essentially makes guitars available that are comparable to what used Fenders from the 80&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s would look like by now had they not been encased in a bulletproof shell. If their not for you that&#8217;s cool, having a professional &#8220;posed&#8221; photo of me doing jumping splits WITHOUT MY GUITAR EVEN BEING PLUGGED INTO ANYTHING isn&#8217;t for me.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/UpLHCMwOOOA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2009-01-10/why-the-relic-fad-should-just-die/comment-page-1/#comment-10615</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Melissa Auf der Maur Premieres New Video by Saara</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/j3VdSSctElM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Saara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1801#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>I love Auf der Maur! The new song is indeed killer :D can't wait for OOOM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Auf der Maur! The new song is indeed killer <img src='http://www.guitartoybox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  can&#8217;t wait for OOOM!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/j3VdSSctElM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-20/melissa-auf-der-maur-premieres-new-video/comment-page-1/#comment-10613</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NAMM 2010 Day 2 Highlights by Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-22 | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/J-7lIQEOv6s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-01-22 | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1774#comment-10597</guid>
		<description>[...] blog post: NAMM 2010 Day 2 Highlights http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-16/namm-2010-day-2-highlights/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog post: NAMM 2010 Day 2 Highlights <a href="http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-16/namm-2010-day-2-highlights/" rel="nofollow">http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-16/namm-2010-day-2-highlights/</a> [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/J-7lIQEOv6s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-16/namm-2010-day-2-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-10597</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DBZ Guitars Bolero Banneret : NAMM 2010 by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/DxAXqa8Voqw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1754#comment-10562</guid>
		<description>I just realised the wording is a little confusing. It says "The new guitar from Dean Guitars hotshot Dean Zelinsky", as in "the hotshot that was at Dean Guitars". I see know how that could be confusing. Consider it edited to fix up any possible confusion. Thanks for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realised the wording is a little confusing. It says &#8220;The new guitar from Dean Guitars hotshot Dean Zelinsky&#8221;, as in &#8220;the hotshot that was at Dean Guitars&#8221;. I see know how that could be confusing. Consider it edited to fix up any possible confusion. Thanks for dropping by.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/DxAXqa8Voqw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-12/dbz-guitars-bolero-banneret-namm-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-10562</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DBZ Guitars Bolero Banneret : NAMM 2010 by Jon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/A4ZsqyGyCrE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1754#comment-10561</guid>
		<description>That's a DBZ Guitar. Dean Zelinsky is no longer affiliated with Dean Guitars!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a DBZ Guitar. Dean Zelinsky is no longer affiliated with Dean Guitars!!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/A4ZsqyGyCrE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-12/dbz-guitars-bolero-banneret-namm-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-10561</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Heard Of – Submit Entry by Best Guitartist You Have Never Heard Of Competition | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/b3azoKh8Yzo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Guitartist You Have Never Heard Of Competition | GuitarToyBox - A guitarist's point of view</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?page_id=1662#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>[...] "Never Heard Of.." Entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Never Heard Of..&quot; Entry [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/b3azoKh8Yzo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/never-heard-of-submit-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-10548</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Randy Rhoads Documentary Trailer by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/Zmb_4PzklaI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1567#comment-10546</guid>
		<description>the youtube link isn't working. anyway it's great that they are making this movie about Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the youtube link isn&#8217;t working. anyway it&#8217;s great that they are making this movie about Randy</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/Zmb_4PzklaI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2009-07-02/randy-rhoads-documentary-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-10546</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ibanez JS2400 Namm Leak – is it real? by Patrik</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/g-EA1ENUeRk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1690#comment-10542</guid>
		<description>at ibanez.de you can see a lot of new guitars for this year... and this is an official website and the ibanez distribution for germany and partner since the 70ies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at ibanez.de you can see a lot of new guitars for this year&#8230; and this is an official website and the ibanez distribution for germany and partner since the 70ies.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/g-EA1ENUeRk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-04/ibanez-js2400-namm-leak-is-it-real/comment-page-1/#comment-10542</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ibanez JS2400 Namm Leak – is it real? by Peter Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~3/pMc7wvqpiq8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guitartoybox.com/?p=1690#comment-10539</guid>
		<description>Joe mentioned this guitar in my interview with him in June: 

http://www.iheartguitarblog.com/2009/06/interview-joe-satriani.html

Satriani: ...Then for the solo we used the prototype Ibanez JS24, which is a 24-fret model I’ve got coming out, which has a very thick, heavy sound. As soon as that solo comes on it’s like, “Whoa.” It has its own identity. I still like doing that, and Andy [Johns, producer] is a big fan of that, of trying to balance the stereo field with different things. So sometimes we’d do it with guitars, sometimes I’d play piano, or organ, or Wurlitzer electric piano, and double my guitar part with a piano part. There are songs where, I kid you not, there’s three synths, an organ, a piano, six 12-strings and an acoustic, all on one side. You can barely hear them but they’re there, kinda gurgling about.

I Heart Guitar: What more can you tell us about the JS24?

Satriani: It’s a really cool thing. I’ve always liked the idea of having those frets up there but I never wanted to move the humbucking pickup. That’s always been the problem because the humbucking neck pickup really only works where Gibson stuck it on the Les Paul. To me, that’s the spot, and once you start moving it back towards the bridge it starts to become horrible-sounding. Other guitars that have had the 24 frets and they move that pickup, it’s like, you may as well get rid of it, you know? So I was determined to solve this. And what saved us was the DiMarzio Pro Track. Ibanez got this thing right up against the last fret. It’s amazing how they were able to do it. It’s got a little bit more generous cutaway to the body so you can get up there and play up there. We’re still experimenting with the bridge pickup. I’m thinking it might be a Norton, one of the pickups I designed along with the FRED and the Mo’Jo with DiMarzio. Steve Blucher at DiMarzio is a wizard, so when I say I designed the pickups, that’s a euphemism for me requesting something (laughs). I say “Steve, can you just give me something that goes, like, ‘KKRRR-RURRRR’?” and he goes “Okay. Gimmie a couple of days.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe mentioned this guitar in my interview with him in June: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.iheartguitarblog.com/2009/06/interview-joe-satriani.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iheartguitarblog.com/2009/06/interview-joe-satriani.html</a></p>
<p>Satriani: &#8230;Then for the solo we used the prototype Ibanez JS24, which is a 24-fret model I’ve got coming out, which has a very thick, heavy sound. As soon as that solo comes on it’s like, “Whoa.” It has its own identity. I still like doing that, and Andy [Johns, producer] is a big fan of that, of trying to balance the stereo field with different things. So sometimes we’d do it with guitars, sometimes I’d play piano, or organ, or Wurlitzer electric piano, and double my guitar part with a piano part. There are songs where, I kid you not, there’s three synths, an organ, a piano, six 12-strings and an acoustic, all on one side. You can barely hear them but they’re there, kinda gurgling about.</p>
<p>I Heart Guitar: What more can you tell us about the JS24?</p>
<p>Satriani: It’s a really cool thing. I’ve always liked the idea of having those frets up there but I never wanted to move the humbucking pickup. That’s always been the problem because the humbucking neck pickup really only works where Gibson stuck it on the Les Paul. To me, that’s the spot, and once you start moving it back towards the bridge it starts to become horrible-sounding. Other guitars that have had the 24 frets and they move that pickup, it’s like, you may as well get rid of it, you know? So I was determined to solve this. And what saved us was the DiMarzio Pro Track. Ibanez got this thing right up against the last fret. It’s amazing how they were able to do it. It’s got a little bit more generous cutaway to the body so you can get up there and play up there. We’re still experimenting with the bridge pickup. I’m thinking it might be a Norton, one of the pickups I designed along with the FRED and the Mo’Jo with DiMarzio. Steve Blucher at DiMarzio is a wizard, so when I say I designed the pickups, that’s a euphemism for me requesting something (laughs). I say “Steve, can you just give me something that goes, like, ‘KKRRR-RURRRR’?” and he goes “Okay. Gimmie a couple of days.”</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsGuitartoybox/~4/pMc7wvqpiq8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.guitartoybox.com/2010-01-04/ibanez-js2400-namm-leak-is-it-real/comment-page-1/#comment-10539</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
