Based on information received and an initial investigation, Eurofins MET Laboratories determined that J&F Hydraulics used the MET Certification Mark template obtained from the Eurofins MET Laboratories website without authorization. The use of the MET Mark in this manner constitutes misuse and may mislead customers, inspectors, and other stakeholders regarding certification status.

Eurofins MET Laboratories takes any misuse of its certification marks seriously and acts promptly to protect the integrity of its certification programs.

Actions Taken

Following our determination that misuse of the MET Certification Mark is likely occurring, Eurofins MET Laboratories has taken the following actions:

• Submitted the matter to Eurofins Legal Group for review
• Issued a cease-and-desist letter to J&F Hydraulics
• Added J&F Hydraulics to the Eurofins MET Laboratories Public Notices page

Important Notice to the Public

Eurofins MET Laboratories is able to address only the misuse or infringement of the MET Certification Mark. We are not able to address allegations related to product cloning, counterfeiting, or infringement of specific products.

If you believe you have encountered misuse of the MET Certification Mark or have questions regarding the certification status of a product or company, please contact Eurofins MET Laboratories directly.

Company Information (as reported)

• Company Name: J&F Hydraulics / J&F Hydraulic Service
• Location: Hayward, California, USA

About Eurofins MET Laboratories

Eurofins MET Laboratories is a global leader in electrical product safety testing and certification services. Our certification marks signify compliance with applicable safety standards and are protected to ensure trust, transparency, and consumer safety.

This notice is issued in the interest of public awareness and certification integrity.

The post Unauthorized Use Of Met Certification Mark By J&F Hydraulics appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

The post Eurofins Electrical & Electronics Compliance Seminar & Crab Feast 2025 appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

The European Union’s Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 formally enforces key provisions of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU, with a particular focus on Articles 3.3(d), (e), and (f). These new cybersecurity requirements are designed to ensure:

• Protection of networks from harmful interference or misuse,
• Safeguarding of personal data and user privacy
• Prevention of fraud and abuse—especially in payment-enabled devices.

Which Products Are Affected?

This isn’t a narrow regulation. If your product includes radio functionality and connects directly or indirectly to the internet, you’re likely within scope. The affected categories include:

• Internet-connected consumer devices
• Smart childcare and toy products
• Wearables
• Virtual payment and transaction equipment

If you manufacture or distribute connected devices in these categories, compliance is not just a best practice, it’s a legal requirement starting next summer.

Understanding EN 18031: The New Harmonized Standard Series

To support manufacturers in demonstrating compliance, the EU published the EN 18031 standards series in early 2025. These standards are now the benchmark for:

• Secure network behavior (EN 18031-1),
• Protection of personal data and privacy (EN 18031-2),
• Fraud prevention in payment-related equipment (EN 18031-3).

Applying these standards grants a presumption of conformity with RED’s cybersecurity requirements, simplifying the path to CE marking.

Notified Body Interpretation & Support

Notified Bodies (NBs) play a critical role in helping manufacturers navigate the compliance pathway—especially when harmonized standards are not applied in full. NBs evaluate product risk, assess cybersecurity protections, and validate conformity for CE marking. Understanding how different bodies interpret the standards can be the key to a smooth market entry.

Where to Start: From Cyber Forms to Phase 1 Evaluation

For many, the process begins with a Phase 1 Cybersecurity Evaluation. This is a structured review of your product’s security posture, radio architecture, software behaviors, and data pathways. Completing the required Cyber Forms initiates this process, and helps map out any required mitigation or design changes well ahead of the enforcement date.

Taking a Secured & Assured Approach

With the August 2025 deadline approaching, the window for proactive planning is now. Working with experienced cybersecurity testing partners can make all the difference in ensuring a successful and stress-free assessment process.

Eurofins Electrical & Electronics has deep experience interpreting RED requirements and supporting manufacturers through every stage of assessment, from early design consultation to final CE marking. If you’re unsure where your product stands or how to begin the compliance process, connecting with a Eurofins engineer can help you navigate your next steps with confidence.

Want to learn more about RED Cybersecurity and EN 18031? Connect with one of our experts.

The post RED Cybersecurity Requirements Take Effect August 1, 2025: What Manufacturers Need to Know appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

Consumers are advised to be especially cautious when purchasing seedling heat mats online. To confirm whether a product is genuinely MET Safety Certified, Eurofins recommends checking its Safety Certification Database. For any questions or concerns, consumers can contact the certification team directly at DG_PTNA010-Certifications@cpt.eurofins.us.com. Taking these steps helps ensure product safety and protects against misleading claims.

The post Fraudulent Claims for Seedling Heat Mats appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

Consumers are urged to exercise caution when purchasing heated pet beds online. To verify whether a product truly holds MET Safety Certification, Eurofins encourages buyers to consult the official Safety Certification Database. If there are any concerns or questions regarding a product’s certification status, consumers are invited to contact the certification team directly at DG_PTNA010-Certifications@cpt.eurofins.us.com. Taking these steps can help ensure the safety and reliability of products in your home.

The post Fraudulent Claims for Heated Pet Beds appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

Radio equipment must bear the CE Mark to be sold in the EU.  The Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU applies to all radio equipment placed on the market in the European Economic Area (EEA). This includes any electrical or electronic product that intentionally emits and/or receives radio waves for the purpose of radio communication and/or radio determination. 

1. Types of Equipment: The RED covers a wide range of radio equipment, including but not limited to mobile phones, tablets, wireless routers, Bluetooth devices, radio transmitters, and receivers. It also includes equipment that uses radio technology for communication over the internet, such as IoT devices, wearable devices, and connected industrial devices 
2. Essential Requirements: The directive sets essential requirements for safety and health, electromagnetic compatibility, and the efficient use of the radio spectrum. It also includes provisions for the protection of privacy, personal data, and against fraud, as well as ensuring interoperability and access to emergency services.  The directives below outline several key areas of testing required for radio equipment.  Note that other directives may apply depending on device type and use case. 
3. Electrical Safety (Low Voltage Directive): Products must be tested for electrical safety to ensure they do not pose a risk of electric shock, fire, or other hazards. This is covered under the Low Voltage Directive (LVD). 
4. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC Directive): Products must be tested for electromagnetic emissions and immunity to ensure they do not interfere with other electronic devices and can operate correctly in their intended environment. This is covered under the EMC Directive. 
5. Radio Frequency (RF) Performance (Radio Equipment Directive): For products that use radio frequencies, such as wireless and communication devices, testing is required to ensure they operate within the allocated spectrum and do not cause harmful interference. This is covered under the Radio Equipment Directive (RED). 
6. Environmental Protection (RoHS Directive): Products must meet environmental protection requirements, such as restrictions on hazardous substances (RoHS) and waste management (WEEE). 
7. Market Access: To be placed on the market in the EU, radio equipment must comply with the RED. This involves conducting a conformity assessment, compiling technical documentation, and affixing the CE Mark to the product 
8. Cybersecurity Requirements: From August 1, 2025, all wireless devices placed on the EU market must also comply with the RED’s cybersecurity requirements. These requirements aim to increase the level of cybersecurity, personal data protection, and privacy for radio equipment. 

Understanding and navigating certification requirements is a very complex process.  With the right guidance and preparation, device manufacturers can achieve compliance and unlock new market opportunities. For more detailed information and assistance, please reach out to the certification experts at Eurofins Labs. 

REDCA Technical Guidance Note 01 

The REDCA Technical Guidance Note 01 (TGN01) provides detailed guidance on the compliance requirements for radio equipment, often referred to as radio modules, and the final radio equipment products that integrate these modules under the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Safety Standard: 

Summary of IEC 62368-1:2023 (Edition 4) 

Title: Audio/video, information and communication technology equipment – Part 1: Safety requirements. 

Scope: This standard specifies the safety requirements for electrical and electronic equipment within the fields of audio, video, information, and communication technology. It aims to reduce the risks of fire, electrical shocks, and other hazards. 

Common ETSI EN Radio Standards: 

Summary of ETSI EN 301 489-1 V2.2.3 

Title: ElectroMagnetic Compatibility (EMC) standard for radio equipment and services; Part 1: Common technical requirements. 

Scope: This standard specifies the common technical requirements for EMC for radio equipment and services. It ensures that radio equipment operates without causing harmful interference and is immune to electromagnetic disturbances. 

Summary of ETSI EN 301 908-1 V15.1.1 

Title: IMT cellular networks; Harmonised Standard for access to radio spectrum; Part 1: Introduction and common requirements. 

Scope: This standard specifies the common technical requirements for access to the radio spectrum for IMT cellular networks, ensuring that equipment operates effectively and efficiently within the allocated spectrum. 

Summary of ETSI EN 301 511 V12.5.1 

Title: Global System for Mobile communications (GSM); Mobile Stations (MS) equipment; Harmonised Standard covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of Directive 2014/53/EU. 

Scope: This standard specifies the technical requirements for GSM mobile stations to ensure they meet the essential requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Summary of ETSI EN 300 328 V2.2.2 

Title: Wideband transmission systems; Data transmission equipment operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM band and using wide band modulation techniques. 

Scope: This standard specifies the technical requirements for wideband data transmission equipment to ensure they meet the essential requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Summary of ETSI EN 301 893 V2.2.1 

Title: 5 GHz RLAN; Harmonised Standard for access to radio spectrum. 

Scope: This standard specifies the technical requirements for 5 GHz Radio Local Area Networks (RLANs) to ensure they meet the essential requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Summary of ETSI EN 300 330 V2.1.1 

Title: Short Range Devices (SRD); Radio equipment in the frequency range 9 kHz to 25 MHz and inductive loop systems in the frequency range 9 kHz to 30 MHz. 

Scope: This standard specifies the technical characteristics and methods of measurement for SRDs to ensure they meet the essential requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Summary of ETSI EN 300 220 V3.2.1 

Title: Short Range Devices (SRD) operating in the frequency range 25 MHz to 1,000 MHz; Part 2: Harmonised Standard for access to radio spectrum for non-specific radio equipment. 

Scope: This standard specifies the technical characteristics and methods of measurement for non-specific Short Range Devices (SRDs) to ensure they meet the essential requirements of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU. 

Summary of CENELEC EN 55032:2015/A1:2020 

Title: Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment – Emission requirements. 

Scope: This standard applies to multimedia equipment (MME) with a rated r.m.s. AC or DC supply voltage not exceeding 600 V. It includes equipment intended primarily for professional use and specifies emission requirements to protect the radio spectrum. 

Summary of CENELEC EN 55035:2017 

Title: Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment – Immunity requirements. 

Scope: This standard applies to multimedia equipment (MME) with a rated AC or DC supply voltage not exceeding 600 V. It includes equipment intended primarily for professional use and specifies immunity requirements to ensure the equipment operates as intended in its environment. 

The post Navigating CE Mark and RED Compliance: A Guide for Radio Equipment Manufacturers appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

According to industry reports, HALT testing reduces product development costs by identifying design flaws early on, potentially leading to a 30-50% decrease in warranty claims and a 20-30% reduction in overall product development time. It allows for faster design iterations and improved product robustness, and in turn, a more reliable product with fewer field failures. 

What is HALT Testing? 

HALT, or Highly Accelerated Life Testing, is a specialized methodology used to push products beyond their design specifications to uncover weaknesses and failure points. Unlike traditional tests that validate a product’s compliance, HALT testing is designed to push products to their limits in order to fail—intentionally. Why? Because each failure uncovers a critical opportunity for improvement. 

In a HALT chamber, products undergo a systematic pattern of increasing thermal and vibrational stresses. Engineers closely monitor performance during the test, analyzing precursors to failure. Once a failure occurs, the product is removed, evaluated, and its design is adjusted to overcome the identified weaknesses. This process is repeated until the product demonstrates resilience under predetermined levels of stress, ensuring durability and reliability. 

Key Components of HALT Testing 

HALT testing progresses through several stages, each designed to assess and enhance different aspects of a product’s durability: 

1. Cold Thermal Stress: Determines the lowest operational and destructive temperature of a product. By gradually reducing the temperature and assessing recovery, engineers identify the “low operating limit” and “lower destructive limit.”
2. Hot Thermal Stress: Assesses the highest operational and destructive temperature. By increasing temperatures incrementally, engineers pinpoint the “upper operating limit” and “upper destructive limit.”
3. Rapid Thermal Stress: Subjects the product to extreme temperature cycling at high rates (typically 70°C/min), simulating thermal shocks that stress components due to expansion and contraction.
4. Vibration Step Stress: Exposes the product to pseudo-random vibrations across frequencies (5Hz–5kHz) to determine operational and destructive vibration limits.
5. Combined Thermal and Vibration Stress: Combines thermal and vibrational extremes to simulate real-world operating conditions. Products are tested under simultaneous temperature cycling and vibration to ensure robustness in dynamic environments. 

Why HALT Testing Matters 

For manufacturers, the stakes are high. Warranty claims, negative reviews, and product recalls can tarnish a brand’s reputation and drain resources. HALT testing provides a proactive solution by revealing and addressing vulnerabilities during the design phase, well before products reach consumers. 

Benefits of HALT Testing: 

• Enhanced Reliability: Identify and eliminate weak points, ensuring consistent performance. 

• Cost Savings: Reduce design iterations, manufacturing defects, and costly warranty claims. 

• Customer Confidence: Deliver products that perform as promised, strengthening brand trust. 

• Faster Time-to-Market: Optimize designs efficiently and get products ready for launch. 

Who Should Consider HALT Testing? 

HALT testing is essential for manufacturers committed to quality, especially those producing high-volume, high-cost, or mission-critical products. Industries including aerospace, automotive, consumer electronics, medical devices, and energy storage (e.g., lithium batteries) stand to gain the most from this rigorous evaluation.  

What to Consider When Looking for HALT Testing 

When selecting a partner for HALT testing, it’s crucial to ensure they have the right capabilities, expertise, and resources to meet your product’s unique needs. Here are key factors to consider: 

1. Comprehensive Testing Capabilities: Look for a facility that offers a full range of HALT services, from Cold Thermal Stress to Combined Thermal and Vibration Stress. Comprehensive capabilities ensure your product is tested thoroughly under all potential stressors.
2. Experienced Engineers: The expertise of reliability engineers is vital for tailoring HALT programs to your product’s specifications. Experienced professionals can accurately interpret test results and provide actionable insights for improving product design.
3. Custom Test Fixture Design: A quality HALT testing provider should offer the ability to design and implement custom test fixtures. Precise setups are essential for ensuring accurate and reliable testing outcomes.
4. Material and Hardware Support: Consider whether the provider can handle material procurement and machining for any specialized hardware your test may require. Seamless support in this area can streamline the testing process and minimize delays.
5. Additional Reliability Services: A provider offering supplementary services, such as compliance testing or field evaluations, can be a valuable partner for broader reliability assessments. This ensures your product is robust across multiple performance metrics.
6. State-of-the-Art Equipment: Advanced HALT chambers and vibration systems are critical for accurate and effective testing. Ensure the facility is equipped with up-to-date technology to replicate extreme conditions with precision. 

By carefully evaluating these factors, you can select a HALT testing provider that not only identifies potential weaknesses in your product but also supports you in building a more reliable and durable design. 

Conclusion: Build Confidence, One Test at a Time 

HALT testing is not just a test—it’s an investment in your product’s future. By intentionally pushing your design to failure, you gain the insights needed to ensure success in the field. At Eurofins E&E, we’re here to partner with you every step of the way, turning challenges into opportunities for innovation. 

Ready to start HALT testing? Contact Eurofins E&E North America today to learn how we can help you enhance your product reliability and achieve unparalleled customer satisfaction. 

The post Standing The Test Of Time With HALT appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

The MET mark signifies that a product has been rigorously tested and certified to meet established safety standards. However, instances of counterfeit or unauthorized use can put consumers at risk. When we identify such cases, we take swift action to inform the public, ensuring that you are aware of potentially unsafe products in the market.

These notices are designed to:

• Alert consumers and businesses to products falsely displaying the MET mark.
• Provide guidance on how to verify the authenticity of a certification.
• Reinforce our commitment to maintaining the highest standards in product safety.

By staying informed and vigilant, you can help protect yourself and others from counterfeit or unsafe products. Visit our public notices section regularly to stay up to date on any new announcements.

Below are reported instances of misuse of the MET Mark and other product safety concerns:

MET Laboratories Warns of Unauthorized Use of the MET Certification Mark on Energy Saving Devices

Fraudulent Claims For Heated Pet Bets

Fraudulent Claims for Seedling Heat Mats

Unauthorized Use Of Met Certification Mark By J&f Hydraulics – Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA

The post Public Notices appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

For manufacturers of IoT devices aiming to enter the North American market, obtaining IoT Network Certification (INC) through PTCRB is a critical step. This certification ensures that devices are compatible with global wireless networks, which is essential for carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile.

What is IoT Network Certification?

IoT Network Certification, managed by CTIA, provides a standardized framework for certifying cellular IoT devices. This program supports a variety of devices with 4G or 5G capabilities regardless of industry or cellular technology. The certification process involves thorough testing to ensure compliance with industry standards.

Key Components of the Certification Process

1. Integrated Device Certification: Devices that use PTCRB-certified modules benefit from reduced testing requirements. These integrated devices traditionally need limited testing for interfaces such as SIM, RF Interface, and Over-the-Air (OTA).
2. SIM Interface Testing: The SIM card is crucial for network connectivity and undergoes specific tests to ensure compatibility. The latest technology, such as the embedded SIM (eSIM), offers reprogrammable capabilities, enhancing flexibility for IoT devices.
3. RF Interface Testing: Ensuring the device’s radio frequency (RF) performance is essential. This includes testing for harmonics, idle-mode sweeps, and compliance with various frequency bands.
4. Over-the-Air (OTA) Testing: OTA testing evaluates the device’s total radiated power (TRP) and total isotropic sensitivity (TIS). This testing is crucial for assessing the device’s antenna performance and overall efficiency.

Steps to Achieve IoT Network Certification

1. Submit a Certification Request: Manufacturers start by submitting a request via the PTCRB certification database
2. Select a Primary Lab: Choose a lab to conduct the necessary tests based on the device’s capabilities.
3. Conduct Testing: The primary lab performs the required tests and submits documentation to the certification database.
4. Certification Issuance: Upon successful completion of all requirements, CTIA issues the PTCRB certification notice.

Benefits of PTCRB Certification

Achieving PTCRB certification ensures compliance with carrier requirements and enhances the marketability of IoT devices. Certified devices are more likely to gain acceptance from major carriers, facilitating smoother market entry and broader adoption.

Conclusion

Navigating the IoT Network Certification through the PTCRB process can be complex, but with the right guidance and preparation, IoT device manufacturers can achieve compliance and unlock new market opportunities. For more detailed information and assistance, please reach out to the certification experts at Eurofins Labs.

The post Navigating IoT Network Certification: Your Step-by-Step Guide to Market Readiness for PTCRB appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.

Embracing Risk Assessments: A New Frontier

Unlike the rigid framework of traditional standards, Risk Assessments offer a dynamic approach to product safety evaluation. Instead of solely relying on predetermined criteria, manufacturers conduct a comprehensive analysis of potential hazards associated with their products. This involves identifying risks, quantifying their likelihood and severity, and implementing mitigation strategies to achieve an acceptable level of safety.

The Changing Landscape of Standards

One of the driving forces behind the adoption of Risk Assessments is the evolution of safety standards themselves. Prominent standards and compliance systems are undergoing revisions to incorporate RA-based requirements. From the transition to hazard-based standards like IEC 62368 to updates in various industry-specific directives, the integration of Risk Assessments has become increasingly prevalent.

Understanding the Risk Assessment Process

At its core, a Risk Assessment involves a meticulous examination of all potential hazards associated with a product. Unlike traditional standards that may focus on a limited set of hazards, Risk Assessments compel manufacturers to consider every conceivable risk scenario, including reasonably foreseeable misuses. This comprehensive approach ensures that safety measures are tailored to address a wide range of potential dangers.

Navigating the Complexities

Preparing a Risk Assessment may seem daunting, especially for manufacturers unfamiliar with the process. However, industry-specific standards such as ISO 14971 for medical devices and EN/ISO 12100 for machinery provide valuable frameworks and guidance. Additionally, standards like IEC 61010-1 offer practical insights into hazard identification and mitigation strategies, making the RA process more accessible to novices.

The Value Proposition of Risk Assessments

While the adoption of Risk Assessments may not be mandatory for all products, the benefits they offer are undeniable. By conducting a thorough assessment of potential hazards, manufacturers can proactively mitigate risks and reduce their liability exposure. Moreover, the iterative nature of Risk Assessments allows for ongoing refinement based on user feedback and evolving safety standards.

A Call to Action

In conclusion, the incorporation of Risk Assessments into product safety practices represents a significant step forward in ensuring consumer safety. Whether mandated by evolving standards or adopted voluntarily, the benefits of Risk Assessments extend far beyond regulatory compliance. Every manufacturer, regardless of industry or product type, should consider integrating Risk Assessments into their product development process. By embracing this proactive approach to safety, manufacturers can not only mitigate risks but also safeguard their reputation and protect consumers.

The post Why Every Manufacturer Should Consider Risk Assessments in Product Safety Testing appeared first on Eurofins Electrical & Electronics NA.