<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://connollyip.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://connollyip.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Schrems II &#8211; Invalidation of the US-EU Privacy Shield</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/schrems-ii-invalidation-of-the-us-eu-privacy-shield/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=schrems-ii-invalidation-of-the-us-eu-privacy-shield</link>
					<comments>https://connollyip.com/schrems-ii-invalidation-of-the-us-eu-privacy-shield/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://connollyip.com/?p=865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to believe that it&#8217;s been almost five years since the Court of Justice of the European Union (&#8220;CJEU&#8221;) decided Schrems I, invalidating the safe harbor provisions for transfer of personal data of European nationals to the United States. The safe harbor provisions were a set of data privacy principles US companies would agree &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/schrems-ii-invalidation-of-the-us-eu-privacy-shield/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Schrems II &#8211; Invalidation of the US-EU Privacy Shield"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://connollyip.com/schrems-ii-invalidation-of-the-us-eu-privacy-shield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garmin&#8217;s Ransomeware Hack</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/garmins-ransomeware-hack/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=garmins-ransomeware-hack</link>
					<comments>https://connollyip.com/garmins-ransomeware-hack/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://connollyip.com/?p=863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a runner and Garmin user. My current watch is a ForeRunner 645M. I love their devices and services. I first noticed that Garmin was having technical issues when a run wouldn&#8217;t sync with the app on my phone and their Garmin Connect website. I soon saw a number of tweets about the outage. After &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/garmins-ransomeware-hack/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Garmin&#8217;s Ransomeware Hack"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://connollyip.com/garmins-ransomeware-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do We Need More Legislation to Curb the Patent Trolls?</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/do-we-need-more-legislation-to-curb-the-patent-trolls/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=do-we-need-more-legislation-to-curb-the-patent-trolls</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 21:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is a strong push for additional patent reforms in Congress. Much of this has to do with the perceived problem of patent &#8220;trolls.&#8221; I&#8217;ve written before that patent litigation hasn&#8217;t exactly exploded over the years, though there may be a current uptick in complaints filed by NPEs. Despite the uptick, two recent evolutions in &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/do-we-need-more-legislation-to-curb-the-patent-trolls/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Do We Need More Legislation to Curb the Patent Trolls?"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Myriad of Issues in Gene Patents</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/a-myriad-of-issues-in-gene-patents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-myriad-of-issues-in-gene-patents</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myriad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This June the Supreme Court issued it&#8217;s opinion in Myriad. In a Solomonish move, the Court split the baby of biotech. Here, all nine members of the Court chose to cleave at a point between isolated DNA being ineligible subject matter on the one hand, and complimentary DNA (cDNA) being eligible on the other. Without &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/a-myriad-of-issues-in-gene-patents/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "A Myriad of Issues in Gene Patents"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowman v. Monsanto: Planting of Patented Seeds to Make a Second Generation of Seeds Infringes RoundUp Ready Patents</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/bowman-v-monsanto-planting-of-patented-seeds-to-make-a-second-generation-of-seeds-infringes-roundup-ready-patents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bowman-v-monsanto-planting-of-patented-seeds-to-make-a-second-generation-of-seeds-infringes-roundup-ready-patents</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Monday, the Supreme Court decided Bowman v. Monsanto and held that a farmer who purchases patented seeds from a grain elevator and then plants those seeds and harvests the crop, infringes the patent. Previous cases had held farmers liable for holding over a portion of their crop for planting the next year, but those &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/bowman-v-monsanto-planting-of-patented-seeds-to-make-a-second-generation-of-seeds-infringes-roundup-ready-patents/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Bowman v. Monsanto: Planting of Patented Seeds to Make a Second Generation of Seeds Infringes RoundUp Ready Patents"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving to Kutak Rock</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/moving-to-kutak-rock-llp/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=moving-to-kutak-rock-llp</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been terrible about writing for this blog for the last month. A major part of that is the fact that I have changed jobs. On April 1, I started at Kutak Rock LLP, a general practice firm in Omaha. In some ways, Kutak is a more traditional law firm than my previous employer which &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/moving-to-kutak-rock-llp/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Moving to Kutak Rock"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Sued for Patent Infringement &#8211; Will Their Lawyers be Sued for Malpractice Next?</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/facebook-sued-for-patent-infringement-will-their-lawyers-be-sued-for-malpractice-next/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-sued-for-patent-infringement-will-their-lawyers-be-sued-for-malpractice-next</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troll]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Facebook has been sued by Rembrandt Social Medial, LP for patent infringement. Rembrandt Social Media doesn&#8217;t run a social media site, but was created by Rembrandt IP Management, LLC, with the family of the deceased inventor of the patents and the inventor&#8217;s company Aduna. According to the complaint Rembrant works &#8220;to help inventors and patent &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/facebook-sued-for-patent-infringement-will-their-lawyers-be-sued-for-malpractice-next/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Facebook Sued for Patent Infringement &#8211; Will Their Lawyers be Sued for Malpractice Next?"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using iOS 6&#8217;s VIP Feature to get In-To-Empty Without Getting Bogged Down</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/using-ios-6s-vip-feature-to-get-in-to-empty-without-getting-bogged-down/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=using-ios-6s-vip-feature-to-get-in-to-empty-without-getting-bogged-down</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Things Done]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written before about using Getting Things Done, and my Weekly Review. Like a lot of people, I have trouble leaving my email alone. A lot of us seem to feel that emails must be at least read, if not responded to, on a real-time basis. This habit can destroy our productivity, and what&#8217;s worse &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/using-ios-6s-vip-feature-to-get-in-to-empty-without-getting-bogged-down/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Using iOS 6&#8217;s VIP Feature to get In-To-Empty Without Getting Bogged Down"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Means Plus Function Claims &#8211; Literally Equivalent</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/means-plus-function-claims-litterally-equivalent/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=means-plus-function-claims-litterally-equivalent</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patenting an Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[112(f)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctrine of equivalents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means plus function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent prosecution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dennis Crouch at Patently-O posted an interesting article about the drop in the percentage of patent applications that have claims utilizing means plus function language. Means plus function claims are based on 35 U.S.C § 112(f) which states: Element in Claim for a Combination.— An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/means-plus-function-claims-litterally-equivalent/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Means Plus Function Claims &#8211; Literally Equivalent"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GTD Weekly Reviews: A Trick to Keep Myself Up-to-Date</title>
		<link>https://connollyip.com/gtd-weekly-reviews/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gtd-weekly-reviews</link>
					<comments>https://connollyip.com/gtd-weekly-reviews/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting Things Done]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connollyip.com/?p=564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[People who work with me know I am a big fan of David Allen&#8217;s Getthing Things Done system. It&#8217;s a great way to manage all your &#8220;stuff&#8221; and in particular your work. It&#8217;s an intuitive and powerful system that uses contexts for helping you know quickly what tasks you can best spend your time on. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://connollyip.com/gtd-weekly-reviews/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "GTD Weekly Reviews: A Trick to Keep Myself Up-to-Date"</span></a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://connollyip.com/gtd-weekly-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
