<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Constitutional Law Prof Blog</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1731818</id>
    <updated>2013-05-20T20:57:00-07:00</updated>
    <subtitle>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ConstitutionalLawProfBlog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="constitutionallawprofblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">ConstitutionalLawProfBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
        <title>Marcia Coyle on the Roberts Court</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/marcia-coyle-on-the-roberts-court.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/marcia-coyle-on-the-roberts-court.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01901c668b70970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T20:57:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T21:47:44-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Marcia Coyle, Chief Washington Correspondent for the National Law Journal, was kind enough to talk with me last week about her new book, The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution. The book tells the full stories (including the fascinating...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Interpretation" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        
        

        <link rel="enclosure" type="audio/mpeg" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/coyle-interview.mp3" length="0" />

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Third Circuit Invalidates President Obama's NLRB Recess Appointment</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/third-circuit-invalidates-president-obamas-nlrb-recess-appointment.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/third-circuit-invalidates-president-obamas-nlrb-recess-appointment.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01901c6685fc970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T20:54:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T21:24:25-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A divided three-judge panel of the Third Circuit last week invalidated President Obama's recess appointment of Craig Becker as a member of the National Labor Relations Board. The ruling, National Labor Relations Board v. New Vista Nursing and Rehabilitation, marks...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Appointment and Removal Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>AP CEO Gary Pruitt Explains Why Justice Probe Violates First Amendment</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/ap-ceo-gary-pruitt-explains-why-justice-probe-violates-first-amendment.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/ap-ceo-gary-pruitt-explains-why-justice-probe-violates-first-amendment.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0192aa1bc149970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-19T20:22:21-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-19T20:22:21-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Associated Press CEO (and former First Amendment lawyer for McClatchy newspapers) Gary Pruitt gave his first television interview today to Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation and blasted the Justice Department seizure of AP phone records as violating the First...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Association" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Tsesis on the History of the Declaration of Independence</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/tsesis-on-the-history-of-the-declaration-of-independence.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/tsesis-on-the-history-of-the-declaration-of-independence.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef017eeb41d342970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T21:18:10-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T21:18:10-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Prof. Alex Tsesis (Loyola Chicago) joined me on Thursday for a talk on his book For Liberty and Equality: The Life and Times of the Declaration of Independence (Oxford 2012). This was a terrific read; I highly recommend it. But...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="History" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        
        

        <link rel="enclosure" type="audio/mpeg" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/tsesis-interview-may-16.mp3" length="0" />

    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Senate Judiciary Approves Srinivasan for D.C. Circuit</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/senate-judiciary-approves-srinivasan-for-dc-circuit.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/senate-judiciary-approves-srinivasan-for-dc-circuit.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0191023a2095970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T20:19:12-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T20:19:12-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Senate Judiciary Committee today unanimously approved Deputy Solicitor General Sri Srinivasan for a slot on the D.C. Circuit. WaPo reports here. We previously posted here, with links to backgrounds and profiles. SDS</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Federal Complaint for Unconstitutional Sex Assignment Surgery on Infant</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/federal-complaint-for-sex-assignment-surgery-on-infant.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/federal-complaint-for-sex-assignment-surgery-on-infant.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0191023517e6970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-16T07:27:24-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T07:27:24-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The surgical "assignment" of sex/gender to an infant born with "ambiguous" genitals is a problem that has garnered much attention. The Constitutional Court of Colombia issued a series of opinions beginning in 1995, analyzed in a 2004 law review article...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Comparative Constitutionalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Due Process (Substantive)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Gender" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Medical Decisions" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Procedural Due Process" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexuality" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The New Yorker, Anonymity, and Confidential Sources</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/the-new-yorker-anonymity-and-confidential-sources.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/the-new-yorker-anonymity-and-confidential-sources.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01901c3909ef970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T16:57:41-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-16T06:32:20-07:00</updated>
        <summary>What if the reporters' confidential sources were unknown even to the reporter? Might this solve the problems that the Court struggled with more than 40 years ago in Branzburg v. Hayes? The New Yorker has introduced a technological attempt to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Force-Feeding at Guantanamo</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/force-feeding-at-guantanamo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/force-feeding-at-guantanamo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01901c34db06970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T10:04:17-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T10:04:17-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The ACLU and 19 other organizations sent a letter this week to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel opposing the military's force-feeding hunger-striking detainees at Guantanamo Bay. According to the ACLU, 29 detainees are currently being force-fed. We previously posted on...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Jurisdiction of Federal Courts" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Medical Decisions" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="War Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Daily Read: First Amendment Institutions by Paul Horwitz</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-first-amendment-institutions-by-paul-horwitz.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-first-amendment-institutions-by-paul-horwitz.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0191022b3edf970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-15T09:25:30-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-15T09:25:30-07:00</updated>
        <summary>ConLawProf Paul Horwitz's new book, First Amendment Institutions seeks to develop the conversation about reorienting First Amendment doctrine towards institutionalism. Most ConLawProfs would agree that First Amendment doctrine suffers from incoherence, but fewer may agree that institutionalism is the solution,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Establishment Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Court Says Plaintiff Can Bring State Suit for Illegal Sale of His Car</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/court-says-plaintiff-can-bring-state-suit-for-illegal-sale-of-his-car.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/court-says-plaintiff-can-bring-state-suit-for-illegal-sale-of-his-car.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019102177811970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T09:48:19-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-13T09:48:19-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court ruled today in Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey that federal law does not preempt a plaintiff's state law claim against a towing company for the illegal sale of his car. The ruling affirms the New...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Federalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Preemption" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Divided Sixth Circuit Panel Upholds Michigan's Public Act 53 Regulating Public School Union Dues Collection</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/divided-sixth-circuit-panel-upholds-michigans-public-act-53-regulating-public-school-union-dues-coll.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/divided-sixth-circuit-panel-upholds-michigans-public-act-53-regulating-public-school-union-dues-coll.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef017eeafd8f3c970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-09T13:04:45-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-09T13:02:49-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A Sixth Circuit panel today upheld the constitutionality of Michigan's Public Act 53 in its opinion in Bailey v. Callaghan. Michigan’s Public Act 53, enacted in 2012, governs public school employee union dues. It provides: A public school employer’s use...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Daily Read: Larry Catá Backer on Chinese Constitutionalism</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-larry-cata%CC%81-backer-on-chinese-constitutionalism.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-larry-cata%CC%81-backer-on-chinese-constitutionalism.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01901bfdb865970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-09T09:06:01-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-09T09:07:17-07:00</updated>
        <summary>What is Chinese constitutionalism? Larry Catá Backer's new article, Towards a Robust Theory of the Chinese Constitutional State: Between Formalism and Legitimacy in Jiang Shigong’s Constitutionalism, available on ssrn, not only provides answers to that query, but develops the topic...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Comparative Constitutionalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Theory" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>D.C. Circuit Strikes NLRB Notice-of-Rights Rule</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/dc-circuit-strikes-nlrb-notice-of-rights-rule.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/dc-circuit-strikes-nlrb-notice-of-rights-rule.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101e6d460970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-08T12:13:57-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-08T12:13:57-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit struck the enforcement mechanisms for the NLRB rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. The ruling yesterday in National Association of Manufacturers v. NLRB means that the NLRB rule is...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Appointment and Removal Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Louisiana Supreme Court Strikes State School Voucher Program</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/louisiana-supreme-court-strikes-state-school-voucher-program.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/louisiana-supreme-court-strikes-state-school-voucher-program.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101e191e9970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-07T21:06:05-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-07T21:06:05-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Louisiana Supreme Court today ruled that the state's school voucher program violates the state constitution. In particular, the court ruled that the voucher program tapped the constitutionally protected per pupil state fund for public education and that the legislature...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="State Constitutional Law" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Rosen Named CEO of National Constitution Center</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/rosen-named-ceo-of-national-constitution-center.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/rosen-named-ceo-of-national-constitution-center.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101d891fc970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-06T15:49:37-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-06T15:49:37-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The National Constitution Center has named Con Law Prof Jeffrey Rosen (GW) as its new president and CEO. Rosen succeeds David Eisner, who stepped down in October 2012. Here's more, from the Philadelphia Inquirer. SDS</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Daily Read: New Book "The Price of Justice" Discusses the Caperton Case</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-new-book-the-price-of-justice-discusses-the-caperton-case.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-new-book-the-price-of-justice-discusses-the-caperton-case.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101d87b4e970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-06T15:43:40-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-06T15:43:40-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The 2009 sharply divided Supreme Court opinion in Caperton v. Massey Coal is the centerpiece of the new book, The Price of Justice: A True Story of Greed and Corruption by Laurence Leamer. Recall that the Court in Caperton ruled...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Campaign Finance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Due Process (Substantive)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New York's Highest Court on the Constitutionality of Force-Feeding Hunger Striking Prisoners</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/new-yorks-highest-court-on-the-constitutionality-of-force-feeding.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/new-yorks-highest-court-on-the-constitutionality-of-force-feeding.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101c5a454970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-03T17:45:10-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-03T17:45:10-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The hunger strike amongst prisoners at Guantanamo Bay has led to force-feeding, a situation prompting the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN to issue a statement reiterating the disapproval of Guantanamo and remind the United...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Due Process (Substantive)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="International" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Medical Decisions" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="State Constitutional Law" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Daily Read: Congressional Research Service on Obama's Federal Court Nominees</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-congressional-research-service-on-obamas-federal-court-nominees.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/daily-read-congressional-research-service-on-obamas-federal-court-nominees.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef019101c575f5970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-03T16:41:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-03T16:41:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The general perception that Congress has been recalcitrant regarding President Obama's nominees to the federal bench can be tested against the Congressional Research Service report, President Obama’s First-Term U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: An Analysis and Comparison with Presidents...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Kansas Outlaws Federal Gun Laws</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/kansas-outlaws-federal-gun-laws.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/05/kansas-outlaws-federal-gun-laws.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef017eeacb2cdc970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-03T10:00:29-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-03T10:00:29-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Kansas thumbed its nose at the federal government and its current and future gun laws recently in SB 102, the Second Amendment Protection Act, which declares federal gun laws unenforceable in the state. In particular, SB 102 says that the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Federalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Preemption" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Second Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supremacy Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tenth Amendment" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Daily Read: Retired Justice O'Connor on Bush v. Gore</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/04/daily-read-retired-justice-oconnor-on-bush-v-gore.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/04/daily-read-retired-justice-oconnor-on-bush-v-gore.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef017eeaafa1de970d</id>
        <published>2013-04-29T17:40:58-07:00</published>
        <updated>2013-04-29T17:41:44-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Speaking to the Chicago Tribune editorial board, retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor reportedly stated that the Court took the case of Bush v. Gore "and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue. Maybe the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="History" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
