<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Constitutional Law Prof Blog</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1731818</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T23:57:00-05:00</updated>
    <subtitle>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ConstitutionalLawProfBlog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="constitutionallawprofblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">ConstitutionalLawProfBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
        <title>Third Circuit: Federal Buy America Act Does Not Preempt State Law</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/third-circuit-federal-buy-america-act-does-not-preempt-state-law.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/third-circuit-federal-buy-america-act-does-not-preempt-state-law.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163003225f5970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-26T23:57:00-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-27T00:11:25-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit ruled this week in Mabey v. Schoch that the federal Buy America Act and implementing regulations do not preempt Pennsylvania's Steel Act. Both acts require the use of steel made in the United...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Contract Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Dormant Commerce Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Federalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Preemption" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Chaskalson on Constitutionalism and Administrative Law</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/chaskalson-on-constitutionalism-and-administrative-law.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/chaskalson-on-constitutionalism-and-administrative-law.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163002c838b970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-26T16:26:52-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-26T16:26:52-05:00</updated>
        <summary>"It is probably inevitable that there should be some tension between judges and politicians in a country like ours where the Constitution entrenches the rule of law, and makes provision for an independent judiciary, and judicial review of legislative and...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Comparative Constitutionalism" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>House Republicans Seek White House Health Care Reform Memos</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/house-republicans-seek-white-house-health-care-reform-memos.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/house-republicans-seek-white-house-health-care-reform-memos.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01630021ec43970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-25T21:53:40-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-25T21:53:40-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Republicans in the House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote to the White House demanding memos on White House deliberations on health care reform referenced in Ryan Lizza's piece in The New Yorker, The Obama Memos: The Making of a Post-Post-Partisan...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Privilege" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Press Freedom Index: US Falls </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/press-freedom-index-us-falls-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/press-freedom-index-us-falls-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01676116d12a970b</id>
        <published>2012-01-25T21:42:20-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-25T21:42:47-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Most Americans take pride in the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." However, Reporters Without Borders has ranked the United States...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Comparative Constitutionalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Fourth Circuit Rejects Padilla's Civil Claims</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/fourth-circuit-rejects-padillas-civil-claims.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/fourth-circuit-rejects-padillas-civil-claims.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0167610096ab970b</id>
        <published>2012-01-24T12:25:35-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-24T12:25:35-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit yesterday rejected Jose Padilla's civil claims against Donald Rumsfeld and other high-level government officials growing out of his designation as an enemy combatant and his military detention. The ruling, Lebron v. Rumsfeld, is...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Jurisdiction of Federal Courts" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Recent Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="War Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Tenth Circuit Finds Banning Registered Sex Offenders from Libraries Unconstitutional</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/tenth-circuit-banning-registered-sex-offenders-from-libraries-unconstitutional.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/tenth-circuit-banning-registered-sex-offenders-from-libraries-unconstitutional.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-24T12:13:06-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0162fff9a801970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-22T18:11:50-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-23T10:07:05-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The City of Albuquerque issued an "Administrative Instruction" banning registered sex offenders from "all public libraries" and further that "Library staff shall send a letter to every sex offender who has a library card and inform them they are no...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Criminal Procedure" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexuality" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit Rejects As Applied Challenge to Washington Election System</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/ninth-circuit-rejects-as-applied-challenge-to-washington-election-system.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/ninth-circuit-rejects-as-applied-challenge-to-washington-election-system.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e5e70884970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-21T16:24:47-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-21T16:24:47-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit this week rejected an as-applied challenge to the two-phase Washington state election system held over from the Supreme Court's ruling in Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party (2008). Recall that the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Association" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="association" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="court" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="first" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="grange" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="state" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="supreme" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="washington" />
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Occupy Jacket-wearer Arrested at Supreme Court Building</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/occupy-jacket-wearer-arrested-at-supreme-court-building.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/occupy-jacket-wearer-arrested-at-supreme-court-building.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-23T11:53:06-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016760e3b2b9970b</id>
        <published>2012-01-21T09:21:49-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-21T14:47:11-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The video below is entitled "Man Arrested for Wearing Occupy Jacket at Supreme Court" (h/t Virginia Wilber) and the title seems accurate. Although we don't have a good view of the jacket, the officer clearly refers to it (and asks...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Supreme Court Vacates Texas Court Redistricting Maps</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/supreme-court-vacates-texas-court-redistricting-maps.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/supreme-court-vacates-texas-court-redistricting-maps.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0162ffe63f63970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-20T11:08:37-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-20T11:20:01-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court today vacated the Texas district court redistricting maps in Perry v. Perez, saying that it was "unclear whether [the district court] followed the appropriate standards in drawing" those maps. The ruling sends the case back to the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="act" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="court" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="rights" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="supreme" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="texas" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="voting" />
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Justice Stevens on Colbert Report on Citizens United, et. al. </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/justice-stevens-on-colbert-report-on-citizens-united-et-al-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/justice-stevens-on-colbert-report-on-citizens-united-et-al-.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-20T16:09:32-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0162ffe4975c970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-20T08:31:26-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-20T12:29:47-05:00</updated>
        <summary>In case you missed retired Justice JP Stevens on The Colbert Report: The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c Colbert Super PAC - John Paul Stevens www.colbertnation.com Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog Video Archive...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Web/Tech" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Groups Challenge President's Recess Appointments</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/groups-challenge-presidents-recess-appointments.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/groups-challenge-presidents-recess-appointments.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e5c73d03970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-19T00:28:00-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-19T00:28:01-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Plaintiffs in ongoing litigation filed a motion last Friday challenging President Obama's recent recess appointments to the NLRB. We most recently posted on the appointments here and here. The plaintiffs--including the National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Appointment and Removal Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="appointment" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="president" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="recess" />
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>SOPA &amp; Protect-IP Bills Provoke First Amendment Concerns </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/sopa-protect-ip-bills-provoke-first-amendment-concerns-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/sopa-protect-ip-bills-provoke-first-amendment-concerns-.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-24T20:18:35-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016760bd3190970b</id>
        <published>2012-01-18T20:10:36-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-18T20:14:09-05:00</updated>
        <summary>SOPA, the Stop Online Privacy Act, H.R.3261, and its Senate counterpart, Protect-IP Act, S. 968, seek to protect copyright on the internet. It has provoked a day of protest today, including "blackouts" by Wikipedia, Reddit, and other sites, contending that...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Web/Tech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Weblogs" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>CFP: Gardens of Justice </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/cfp-gardens-of-justice-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/cfp-gardens-of-justice-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0162ffc18ec1970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-17T21:17:16-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-17T21:17:16-05:00</updated>
        <summary>What are constitutions if not plans for gardens? A wonderful and imaginative call for papers for a critical legal conference in Stokholm this September, via Kate Sutherland at Osgoode Hall's law.arts.culture. From the CFP: "The theme for next year’s Critical...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Theory" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Fourth Circuit to Rick Perry (and Gingrich): Laches, Laches, Laches</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/fourth-circuit-to-rick-perry-laches-laches-laches.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/fourth-circuit-to-rick-perry-laches-laches-laches.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016760b5a6e3970b</id>
        <published>2012-01-17T20:45:55-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-17T20:57:02-05:00</updated>
        <summary>"We cannot grant Movant’s request for this extraordinary remedy. We find it unnecessary to address whether Movant would ikely succeed in his constitutional challenges because the district court was correct in concluding that the defense of laches bars the requested...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>MLK Day 2012</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/mlk-day-2012.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/mlk-day-2012.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e59fc5d7970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-16T08:30:52-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-16T08:37:35-05:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama's Presidential Proclamation on Martin Luther King Day, 2012, includes these words: At a time when our Nation was sharply divided, Dr. King called on a generation of Americans to be "voices of reason, sanity, and understanding amid the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="History" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Race" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Reconstruction Era Amendments" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scholarship" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>. . . and Candidate Rick Perry has filed an appeal to the Fourth Circuit </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/-and-candidate-rick-perry-has-filed-an-appeal-to-the-fourth-circuit-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/-and-candidate-rick-perry-has-filed-an-appeal-to-the-fourth-circuit-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0162ffa08b4f970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-15T15:39:12-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-17T21:31:14-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Republican Presidential Candidate Rick Perry has appealed from the district court's order denying his First Amendment claim for a preliminary injunction. In the emergency motion for injunction pending appeal, Perry's attorneys argue that the requirements for laches - - -...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Association" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Ripeness" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Standing" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Four Republican Candidates Lose First Amendment Ballot Challenge in Virginia on Laches</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/republican-candidates-lose-first-amendment-ballot-claim-in-virginia-on-laches.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/republican-candidates-lose-first-amendment-ballot-claim-in-virginia-on-laches.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e58613f2970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-14T11:46:22-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-15T15:40:37-05:00</updated>
        <summary>In the opinion in Perry v. Judd (with Gingrich, Huntsman, and Santorum as intervenors), Judge John Gibney of the Eastern District of Virginia denied the motion for preliminary injunction seeking to allow the Republican candidates on the ballot on the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Association" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Federalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fifteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Standing" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Posner, Dreadlocks, and Free Exercise: Seventh Circuit Allows Prisoner Suit to Proceed</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/posner-dreadlocks-and-free-exercise-seventh-circuit-allows-prisoner-suit-to-proceed.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/posner-dreadlocks-and-free-exercise-seventh-circuit-allows-prisoner-suit-to-proceed.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2012-01-15T15:51:22-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e57abe20970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-13T15:31:42-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-15T15:45:56-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Writing the opinion in Grayson v. Schuler, Judge Posner, in his imitable style, has rejected what he terms a "Rastafarian exception" to a prison practice of allowing Rastafarians, but not others, to have dreadlocks. In case readers of the opinion...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Establishment Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Free Exercise Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Religion" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>OLC OKs President Obama's Recess Appointments</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/olc-oks-president-obamas-recess-appointments.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/olc-oks-president-obamas-recess-appointments.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-13T11:16:20-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e56c9bda970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-12T16:28:23-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-12T16:27:27-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel today released its opinion (dated January 6, 2012) concluding that President Obama had authority under the Recess Appointments Clause to appoint Richard Cordray as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and members...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Appointment and Removal Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="appointment" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="cordray" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="President" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="recess" />
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The Supreme Court Recognizes the Ministerial Exception in Hosana-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/the-supreme-court-recognizes-the-ministerial-exception-in-hosana-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-a.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/the-supreme-court-recognizes-the-ministerial-exception-in-hosana-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-a.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-01-12T13:19:25-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e55dba95970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-11T16:35:22-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-11T16:36:15-05:00</updated>
        <summary>In a unanimous and somewhat narrow opinion today, the United States Supreme Court in Hosana-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC recognized the so-called "ministerial exception" barring a lawsuit against a religious organization by an employee seeking relief pursuant...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Establishment Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Free Exercise Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Religion" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

