<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Constitutional Law Prof Blog</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1731818</id>
    <updated>2012-02-10T16:04:22-05:00</updated>
    <subtitle>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ConstitutionalLawProfBlog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="constitutionallawprofblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">ConstitutionalLawProfBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
        <title>Controversial School Prayer Case in West Texas Comes to (Controversial) End </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/controversial-school-prayer-case-in-west-texas-comes-to-controversial-end-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/controversial-school-prayer-case-in-west-texas-comes-to-controversial-end-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163011b1728970d</id>
        <published>2012-02-10T16:04:22-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-10T16:04:22-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The case settled. I n the settlement approved by the court, the school district agreed its employees would "not do any of the following in the presence of students, either during the school day or at School District-sponsored activities or...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Religion" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>D.C. Circuit Rejects Detainee Habeas Claim</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/dc-circuit-rejects-detainee-habeas-claim.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/dc-circuit-rejects-detainee-habeas-claim.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e710d44d970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-09T18:51:21-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-09T18:51:21-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit rejected Guantanamo detainee Abdul-Rahman Abdo Abulghaith Suleiman's habeas claim earlier this week. The case is just the latest from the D.C. Circuit on habeas claims of a Guantanamo detainees. The court applied its...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Habeas Corpus" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>State FOIA for State Residents Only:  Constitutional According to the Fourth Circuit</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/state-foia-for-state-residents-only-constitutional-according-to-the-fourth-circuit.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/state-foia-for-state-residents-only-constitutional-according-to-the-fourth-circuit.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e7022d2b970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-09T07:25:00-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-08T21:29:05-05:00</updated>
        <summary>May a state limit its statutory Freedom of Information Act to "state citizens"? Doesn't such a provision violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV? Or the dormant aspect of the commerce clause? Not according to the Fourth Circuit....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Dormant Commerce Clause" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Privileges and Immunities: Article IV" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Oral Arguments in Torture Suit Against Rumsfeld</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/oral-arguments-in-torture-suit-against-rumsfeld.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/oral-arguments-in-torture-suit-against-rumsfeld.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163010e3b7b970d</id>
        <published>2012-02-09T00:21:32-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-09T00:21:32-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The en banc Seventh Circuit heard oral argument on Wednesday in Vance v. Rumsfeld, the case by two American military contractors against the former Secretary of Defense (among others) for authorizing their torture while in military detention in Iraq. We...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congressional Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Foreign Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Jurisdiction of Federal Courts" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Oral Argument Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="War Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Justice Sotomayor Listens to Both Sides of the Case - - - On Sesame Street</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/justice-sotomayor-listens-to-both-sides-of-the-case-on-sesame-street.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/justice-sotomayor-listens-to-both-sides-of-the-case-on-sesame-street.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e6f389c1970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-07T21:21:06-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-07T21:21:06-05:00</updated>
        <summary>For your (children's) viewing pleasure: RR</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Opinion Analysis: Ninth Circuit in Perry v. Brown, the Prop 8 case</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/opinion-analysis-ninth-circuit-in-perry-v-brown-the-prop-8-case.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/opinion-analysis-ninth-circuit-in-perry-v-brown-the-prop-8-case.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-02-08T12:53:21-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016761f04537970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-07T20:43:10-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-08T18:04:07-05:00</updated>
        <summary>As we noted earlier today, the Ninth Circuit panel has affirmed the district judge that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional, in a 2-1 decision. The panel was unanimous on two points: First, the proponents had standing. The standing issue is convoluted...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Family" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Gender" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexual Orientation" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexuality" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Prop 8 Opinion: Ninth Circuit Rules Prohibiting Same-Sex Marriage Unconstitutional</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/prop-8-opinion-ninth-circuit-rules-prohibiting-same-sex-marriage-unconstitutional.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/prop-8-opinion-ninth-circuit-rules-prohibiting-same-sex-marriage-unconstitutional.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016761e5ad8b970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-07T13:16:33-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-07T20:45:06-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The Ninth Circuit panel has rendered its opinion in Perry v. Brown, on the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 that prohibited same-sex marriage, affirming 2-1 Judge Vaugn Walker's extensive opinion based on the trial (our recap here) the videotapes of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Federalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Gender" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexual Orientation" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Standing" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Republican Senators to Oppose Recess Appointments as Friends of Court</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/republican-senators-to-oppose-recess-appointments-as-friends-of-court.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/republican-senators-to-oppose-recess-appointments-as-friends-of-court.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016300e350bc970d</id>
        <published>2012-02-06T21:32:37-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-06T21:32:37-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A group of 39 Republican Senators said on Friday that they would file an amicus brief in a court case challenging President Obama's recent recess appointments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the National Labor Relations Board. We posted...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Appointment and Removal Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Seventh Circuit Rejects Bar Applicant's Effort to Dodge Rooker-Feldman</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/seventh-circuit-rejects-bar-applicants-effort-to-dodge-rooker-feldman.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/seventh-circuit-rejects-bar-applicants-effort-to-dodge-rooker-feldman.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e6b3ba1f970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-04T23:58:00-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-04T23:59:51-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The Seventh Circuit ruled last week in Brown v. Bowman that a bar applicant's claim in federal district court for constitutional violations in his bar application and appeal process was barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. (The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents lower...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit Sets Pleading Standard for Civil Rights Claims Against Municipalities</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ninth-circuit-sets-pleading-standard-for-civil-rights-claims-against-municipalities.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ninth-circuit-sets-pleading-standard-for-civil-rights-claims-against-municipalities.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01676193b9ea970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-02T18:29:24-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-02T18:29:24-05:00</updated>
        <summary>A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled this week in AE v. Tulare that a civil rights plaintiff suing a municipality under Monell v. Department of Social Services has to allege some concrete facts to satisfy the pleading standard...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fourteenth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit: The Prop 8 Trial Videotapes Remain Sealed</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ninth-circuit-the-prop-8-trial-videotapes-remain-sealed.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ninth-circuit-the-prop-8-trial-videotapes-remain-sealed.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2012-02-02T22:07:14-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e6858ec7970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-02T13:37:51-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-02T13:37:51-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The Ninth Circuit today issued its opinion in Perry v. Brown holding that the Proposition 8 trial videotapes will not be released. The panel - - - Judges Reinhardt, Hawkins, and NR Smith - - - reversed the decision of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Film" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexual Orientation" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>CFP: Social Justice Feminism</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/cfp-social-justice-feminism.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/cfp-social-justice-feminism.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0167618dd423970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-02T10:21:18-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-02T10:26:10-05:00</updated>
        <summary>For scholars working on constitutional issues relating to social justice and gender, a terrific-looking conference, Social Justice Feminism, will be held at University of Cincinnati College of Law on October 26-27, 2012. The deadline is April 1, 2012; submissions of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Conferences" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Gender" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>ACLU Sues for Material Authorizing Targeted Killings</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/aclu-sues-for-legal-authority-for-targeted-killings.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/aclu-sues-for-legal-authority-for-targeted-killings.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef016761867c83970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-02T00:26:47-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-02T00:29:22-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The ACLU filed suit on Wednesday against the U.S. government in the Southern District of New York seeking the release of records related to the targeted killings of U.S. citizens overseas. Recall that the New York Times and two reporters...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Executive Authority" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="War Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Challenge to Constitutionality of DOMA by Military Member</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/challenge-to-constitutionality-of-doma-by-military-member.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/challenge-to-constitutionality-of-doma-by-military-member.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163008ed422970d</id>
        <published>2012-02-01T21:39:28-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-01T21:39:28-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Tracey Cooper-Harris (pictured right), a member of the US Army for twelve years, has filed a complaint against the US for veterans benefits for her same-sex partner, arguing that DOMA and the VA definition of "spouse" violates the Fifth Amendment's...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Disability" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Equal Protection" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fifth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexual Orientation" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Ruth Bader Ginsburg Speaks About Constitutionalism on Egyptian Television </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ruth-bader-ginsburg-speaks-about-constitutionalism-on-egyptian-television-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/ruth-bader-ginsburg-speaks-about-constitutionalism-on-egyptian-television-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01676182df3d970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-01T18:33:29-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-01T18:36:13-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Justice Ginsburg discusses the formation of the US Constitution, mentioning "Remember the Ladies," slavery, Native Americans, immigrants, and the death penalty, as well as other matters of constitutionalism, in an interview on Al Hayat TV in Egypt. RR (h/t Barbara...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Comparative Constitutionalism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Arrest of Documentary Filmmaker in House of Representatives</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/arrest-of-documentary-filmmaker-in-house-of-representatives.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/arrest-of-documentary-filmmaker-in-house-of-representatives.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef01676180838e970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-01T15:19:58-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-01T15:19:58-05:00</updated>
        <summary>As the NYT reports, the filmmaker Josh Fox whose documentary “Gasland” raised questions about "fracking," was escorted from a House of Representatives subcommittee hearing today and given a misdemeanor citation. Although Fox shouted this "is a public hearing!” and “I’m...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Film" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Teaching Tips" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>First Circuit Rejects NOM's Challenges to Disclosure Laws Redux</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/first-circuit-rejects-noms-challenges-to-disclosure-laws-redux.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/first-circuit-rejects-noms-challenges-to-disclosure-laws-redux.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0167617daf06970b</id>
        <published>2012-02-01T12:13:19-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-01T12:15:20-05:00</updated>
        <summary>In what the First Circuit calls the "second chapter" of challenges to the constitutionality of Maine's registration and disclosure laws regarding election-related advocacy, the court in National Organization for Marriage [NOM] v. McKee, essentially reaffirms its opinion last August in...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Campaign Finance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Due Process (Substantive)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Elections and Voting" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="First Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fundamental Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Gender" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sexual Orientation" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Speech" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Standing" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>CFP: Class and "the American Dream"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/cfp-class-and-the-american-dream.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/02/cfp-class-and-the-american-dream.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0168e67e0464970c</id>
        <published>2012-02-01T10:31:04-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-02-01T10:31:04-05:00</updated>
        <summary>From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream will be held at University of Wisconsin, Madison, and seeks to "bring together scholars, economists, activists, policymakers, and others to critically examine both the relationships between and the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Conferences" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>D.C. Court Rejects Due Process Claim in Immigration Case</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/dc-court-rejects-due-process-claim-in-immigration-case.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/dc-court-rejects-due-process-claim-in-immigration-case.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163005c923a970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-29T22:07:54-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-29T22:07:54-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle (D.D.C.) on Friday rejected a U.S. citizen's claim that the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the Consul General at the U.S. Consulate in Sydney violated her Fifth Amendment due...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cases and Case Materials" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Courts and Judging" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Due Process (Substantive)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fifth Amendment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Jurisdiction of Federal Courts" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Opinion Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Separation of Powers" />
        
        


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Jon Stewart on FCC v. Fox and Hosana-Tabor</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/jon-stewart-on-fcc-v-fox-and-hosana-tabor.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/01/jon-stewart-on-fcc-v-fox-and-hosana-tabor.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0163005917d5970d</id>
        <published>2012-01-29T16:49:33-05:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-29T21:15:01-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Need a bit of humor? The latest episode of The Daily Show had some provocative comedy related to constitutional law developments earlier this month. On the FCC v. Fox oral arguments, Stewart made somewhat implicit comparisons between sex and violence....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>constitutional lawblogger</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court (US)" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Web/Tech" />
        
        


    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

