<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>

<title>Consumer Watchdog | Insurance</title>
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/feed/insurance/</link>
<description>Updates from Consumer Watchdog, a nationally recognized consumer group working to protect and improve the lives of American consumers and taxpayers.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>15</ttl>


<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Mercury General Using Guise Of Benevolence To Assault Prop. 103</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
...one should wonder why Mercury, which is already one of the leading insurers in the state, would spend heavily to make its home market more competitive. I'm inclined to think the company has something else on its mind, and I'd bet that giving customers a break isn't it. Forewarned is forearmed: Hang on to your wallets. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/EHZWFy91oLA/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28227</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:17:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28227</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>'Pay-As-You-Drive' Auto Policies Could Become Option By Year's End</title>
<description>Doug Heller, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, a Santa Monica
advocacy group, complained that Poizner's proposal would give insurance
companies too much leeway to decide whether or not to offer a
pay-as-you-drive option to potential customers. He said he feared that the regulations would allow companies to offer
smaller discounts than they should for people who cut their driving by
only modest amounts.</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/BJs_9UV5T-E/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28171</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:53:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28171</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Consumers Urge DC Council to Make Insurers Accountable In Court For Unfairly Delaying, Denying Insurance Claims</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Washington, D.C. -- Insurance policyholders whose legitimate insurance
claims were low-balled, delayed or denied by their insurance companies
testified before the D.C. Council yesterday in support of legislation
that would allow consumers to hold their insurer accountable in court. Consumer Watchdog joined policyholders, advocacy organizations and
attorneys for insurance consumers to call on the committee on Public
Services and Consumer Affairs to forward legislation swiftly to the
full council.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/UIjbmgF8mWE/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28129</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:28:54 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28129</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>My View: HB 1171 Is Simply A Gift To Insurers</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
This My View was co-signed by Birny Birnbaum, executive
director of the Center for Economic Justice; Douglas Heller, executive
director of Consumer Watchdog; and Amy Bach, executive director of
United Policyholders.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the strongest possible terms, we urge Gov. Charlie Crist to veto the home insurance deregulation bill, SB2036/HB1171. This bill is an invitation for insurers to game the Florida regulatory system and abuse consumers.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/N3GpjKDcIOs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28117</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:37:30 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28117</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>State Farm Florida: We Will Re-Examine Departure if 'Consumer Choice' Bill Signed</title>
<description>Consumer groups have sent letters to Crist urging him to veto the
measure. In addition, Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty has warned
of the bill's potential adverse effects in the state's property insurance market, specifically Florida's domestic insurers that do not qualify to charge deregulated rates as outlined in the bill.&amp;nbsp; Most recently a joint letter was sent by the Consumer Federation of
America, the Center for Economic Justice, Consumer Watchdog, and United
Policyholders.&amp;nbsp; The groups said the bill &amp;quot;is an invitation for insurers
to game the Florida regulatory system and abuse consumers.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/sObwSz926dY/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28109</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:15:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=28109</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>25 Cal Republican Lawmakers Urge Supreme Court to Help Safeco Insurance</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
In a stunning show of fealty to insurance giant Safeco, 25 Republican lawmakers &lt;a href="http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/RepublicanACinSupportofSafeco.pdf"&gt;have asked&lt;/a&gt; the California Supreme Court to overturn an appellate ruling that Safeco Insurance has to disclose the names of policyholders it may have cheated...
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/JlJRRicjP0w/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27996</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:33:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27996</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Veto The Anti-Consumer Property Insurance Bill</title>
<description>Gov. Crist has already indicated some reservations about signing this
bill. We implore him to continue that smart thinking and to continue
looking out for the best interests of Florida's insurance consumers. Consumer
advocates across the state are expressing similar concerns, including
the Florida Public Interest Research Group, the Consumer Federation of
the Southeast, the Florida Consumer Action Network, Consumer Watchdog,
the Center for Economic Justice, United Policyholders, Insured's Public
Action Coalition, Floridians In Action as well as Florida's Insurance
Consumer Advocate Sean Shaw.</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/t_9JJrt5NoE/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27753</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:31:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27753</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Property Insurance Battle: Fight Heats Up Over Bill To Allow Property Insurers To Raise Rates On Their Own</title>
<description>&lt;strong&gt;Governor Urged To Veto Deregulation Bill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fight is heating up against legislation that would essentially allow large property insurers to raise rates without state approval. Consumer groups opposed to the bill include Florida Consumer Action
Network, Consumer Watchdog, Center for Economic Justice, United
Policyholders, Insured's Public Action Coalition and Floridians In
Action.</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/PNyhVcXDbJM/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27534</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:53:35 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27534</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>NYT editorializes against federalization of insurance regulation</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
We've been posting a lot about big insurers' plot to win deregulation as part of the federal financial overhaul.&amp;nbsp; Now the New York Times has, quite succinctly, &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/opinion/21thu1.html" target="_blank"&gt;made the case&lt;/a&gt; against this play for federalization.&lt;a href="http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27286" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/d9-GHWCKWXc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27457</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:55:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27457</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>San Jose Assemblyman Reaps Campaign Cash As Insurance Committee Chair</title>
<description>&amp;quot;He hasn't done anything resembling oversight of the insurance
industry,&amp;quot; said Consumer Watchdog's executive director, Douglas Heller.
&amp;quot;And the few times that he has taken tough positions, he's worked
vigorously to advance the industry's interests against the interests of
consumers.&amp;quot;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/hxhR8BdY6qY/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27512</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:10:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27512</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Insurers, Including AIG, Spent Nearly $36 Million to Influence Congress</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Insurance companies, including American International Group (AIG), spent nearly $36 million in recent years on &lt;a href="../../../insurance/articles/?storyId=27286"&gt;political contributions to members of Congress&lt;/a&gt;, according to the Consumer Watchdog and the Center for Responsive Politics. Also among the big givers were Hartford Financial and Lincoln Financial, two companies that are&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-CreditCrisis/idUSTRE54E14B20090515"&gt;in line to get billions in TARP funds&lt;/a&gt; from the U.S. Treasury. Consumer Watchdog says that insurers are hoping that Congress&amp;nbsp;will
support&amp;nbsp;their effort to opt out of state regulation in favor of a
federal regulator.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/JeDbz08vN6Y/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27371</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 10:07:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27371</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>State Farm To Cut Auto Rates</title>
<description>State Farm had to be prodded into reducing premiums as much as it
did, said Douglas Heller, executive director of Consumer Watchdog, a
Santa Monica group that advocates on behalf of policyholders on
regulatory matters before the state Department of Insurance. State Farm last year originally asked Poizner to lower rates by about
$88 million, Heller said. Consumer Watchdog argued that a $350-million
reduction would be justified, and Poizner approved a cut of $219
million. &amp;quot;Even with this rate decrease,&amp;quot; Heller said, &amp;quot;State Farm customers will
be paying more than they should be for the auto coverage they are
getting.&amp;quot;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/pNQmwJTvIvA/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27313</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:04:09 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27313</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Seeking An Insurance Policy - On Regulation</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The
federal government should oversee insurance,&amp;quot; U.S. Rep. Paul Kanjorski
(D-PA) said yesterday as he convened another House hearing on how to
regulate risk. But what if the new federal insurance watchdog set up rules and
rates that were weaker than the protections some states now give
consumers? That's what happened in the banking business, where credit card
lenders used federal regulation to preempt consumer-protection laws in
states such as Pennsylvania 30 years ago. Insurance activists like Douglas Heller of Consumer Watchdog worry that that'll happen in their industry, too. Kanjorski has attracted more campaign money from
insurance people - a half-million dollars, by Heller's count - than any
other House member in the last two election cycles.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/kQsFUDC7KAA/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27312</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:45:35 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27312</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>State Farm To Cut Car Insurance Rates For Calif.</title>
<description>Doug Heller, the executive director of Consumer Watchdog, said State
Farm proposed last year to lower auto insurance rates by 3.2 percent or
about $88 million as required by state law. Heller said his Santa
Monica-based group challenged the proposal, arguing the company was
relying on one year's worth of data for determining its loss trends,
which are used to predict future losses and to set the rate. Heller
said insurance providers were previously required to consider three
years' worth of data on losses, but Poizner loosened the rule last year.</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/JEOghPaYE4M/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27293</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:43:13 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27293</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Insurers Contributed $35.7 Million To Members of Congress Since 2005</title>
<description>Auto, home, business and life insurance companies contributed
$35,743,017 million to members of Congress during the last two election
cycles, according to an analysis released today by the nonprofit,
nonpartisan Consumer Watchdog. About $5 million went to members of the
House subcommittee holding a hearing Thursday entitled &amp;quot;How Should the
Federal Government Oversee Insurance?&amp;quot;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/A3dpXC7H_dc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27286</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:46:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27286</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>California Court: Safeco Must Disclose Surcharges</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
LOS ANGELES, CA -- A group of California attorneys have won a battle
with Safeco Insurance Co. over surcharges the company was charging
customers. A state appellate court decision allows policyholders to
have their day in court, said Harvey Rosenfield, the author of
Proposition 103, which Safeco allegedly violated.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/ZvICzmtK1bo/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27196</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:28:08 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27196</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Consumer Advocates Ask Gov. Crist To Veto Home Insurance Deregulation</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Four consumer advocacy groups implored Gov. Charlie Crist today to veto a
bill that would allow large insurers to charge essentially unregulated
rates. &amp;quot;This bill is an invitation for insurers to game the Florida
regulatory system and abuse consumers,&amp;quot; said officials from the
Consumer Federation of America, Consumer Watchdog, Center for Economic
Justice and United Policyholders in a letter to the governor. &amp;quot;No price
can be too high, no discrimination can be found unfair if a policy is
issued under these terms.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/jZJFipmlBKs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27156</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:16:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27156</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Florida Legislature sends home insurance deregulation bill to Gov. Crist</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
In recent years Floridians have seen the worst of the insurance industry.&amp;nbsp; From lousy hurricane claims handling to price gouging, dumping customers and defiance of state orders.&amp;nbsp; It got so bad with Allstate, that the company was barred from doing business...
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/xKHzaOvI7so/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27155</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:39:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27155</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Court: Class Members Must Be Disclosed</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Sued Companies Must Disclose Class Members, Court Says&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, lawyers suing Safeco can proceed with demands for a list of
California residents who were &amp;quot;ripped off by the defendants,&amp;quot; said
Harvey Rosenfeld, counsel for Santa Monica-based Consumer Watchdog. &amp;quot;After 7 years of winning delays in the court Safeco is out of legal
options. I think they are going to have to face the facts and issues
refunds for consumers,&amp;quot; said Rosenfeld. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/kFs4C_XV1N4/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27140</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:45:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27140</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Safeco Must Disclose Who It Surcharged for Auto Insurance, Court Rules</title>
<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lawsuit Seeking Refunds for Violations of Proposition 103 Will Proceed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Santa Monica, CA&lt;/em&gt; &amp;shy;&amp;ndash; Safeco Insurance Company will be required to
disclose which customers it surcharged due to their lack of prior
continuous automobile insurance coverage, the California Court of
Appeal in Los Angeles has ruled.&amp;nbsp; Plaintiffs allege that such
unapproved and undisclosed surcharges violate Proposition 103, the
landmark insurance regulation initiative approved by California voters
in 1988.</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/pRkf4BK816s/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27095</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:05:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/courts/articles/?storyId=27095</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Health insurers' insider power play in California</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
The shameful way a legislative committee vote went down in
California yesterday tears the veil off how health insurance companies
and HMOs will fight in Washington against tough, honest health care
reforms. I thought I knew how Sacramento worked; I had trouble even
believing this one. And you'll see below why you should go to Consumer
Watchdog and &lt;a href="http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/complaints/"&gt;tell us your stories&lt;/a&gt; about outrageous premium increases for health insurance. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/P2DLrf4nZu8/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27027</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:42:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27027</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Mercury Insurance, Asm Joe Coto protest their own hearing</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
In one of the weirder moves I've seen over the past decade-plus that I've been going to Sacramento, Assemblyman Joe Coto and Mercury Insurance did not show up for the Judiciary Committee hearing of their bill (AB 1054) yesterday.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/hdE2en3lgkM/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27018</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:13:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=27018</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Sacramento: Insurer refunds, HMO premium regulation, recission bills face test</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Today, Consumer Watchdog will be in Sacramento to stop Mercury Insurance's latest assault on insurance reform Proposition 103 -- legislation that precludes California's insurance commissioner and judges from ordering refunds. Also on the table is legislation to regulate HMO premiums and prevent capricious HMO policy cancellations. 
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/6tax2bxOruQ/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26804</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:15:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26804</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Keep Insurance Regulation In State Hands</title>
<description>&amp;quot;Allowing insurers to pick their regulator, just like AIG did, will
negate hard-won consumer rights laws and destroy state-based
oversight,&amp;quot; Carmen Balber of Consumer Watchdog pointed out. &amp;quot;That web
of state insurance laws, which the insurance industry has long decried
as complicated and anti-competitive, withstood the test of fire by
keeping insurance products and companies stable throughout this
financial crisis.&amp;quot;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/RoTbBdwfdFQ/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26539</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:34:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26539</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Insurance And The Feds</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
RE: ''Regulate Me, Please,'' by Tom Wilson, the chairman of Allstate (Op-Ed, April 16).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What the insurance industry really wants is to escape tough state
rules, like those that prohibit excessive profit, overhead and
executive salaries in California, or mandate an affordable lifeline
auto insurance program for low-income drivers. Our consumer group
intervened before the California insurance commissioner to force
Allstate to lower its homeowner's and auto insurance rates by $500
million last year because of strong state laws that Mr. Wilson hopes to
evade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ConsumerWatchdogInsurance/~3/f5fLpJfJiY8/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26475</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:57:00 PDT</pubDate>  
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=26475</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>
