Court Martial Lawyer | Military Attorney 1-866-969-9860

Criminal Attorney Centre County PA: Assault Offenses in Pennsylvania

admin — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:32:23 +0000

Criminal Attorneys Clearfield County PA: What You Might Want To Know On The Subject Of Assault Crime

Pennsylvania Assault Crimes Defense Lawyers

Across The State Of PA, assault crimes are usually split up in to 4 basic categories; simple assault, negligent assault, felony assault, and aggravated assault. Across Pennsylvania, simple assault is when you were reckless or knew your behavior may perhaps bring about physical harm to another individual, including an unborn child. Negligent assault is when an individual ended up being injured but you acted without the intent to purposely cause harm to another individual. Felony assault happens when you caused serious harm to an individual and/or harmed or tried to cause harm to another person while using a deadly weapon like a gun, knife, baseball bat, tire iron, etc. If you require the help of a Criminal Attorneys State College PA.

PA Criminal Attorney

Aggravated assault is considered slightly less serious than felonious assault within the state of PA, even though the key elements are similar, if you were “under the influence of sudden passion or perhaps a sudden fit of rage” you might be arrested for aggravated assault as opposed to the more severe felony assault. Any kind of assault charge throughout the State of PA is going to be a serious matter and might be terrifying. If perhaps you are looking at assault charges across the State of Pennsylvania, it is best to immediately seek the advice of a legal professional who specializes in crimes of assault. Retain a Criminal Attorneys in Pennsylvania immediately.

PA Assault Crimes Attorneys – Criminal Defense Lawyer PA

In Clinton County PA as well as across PA the punishment for assault crimes can be very severe. A straightforward assault charge may be regarded as a first degree misdemeanor which means you could quite possibly spend time in jail plus face fines.

What You Need To Do If Perhaps You Have Been Arrested For An Assault Crime In Lock Haven PA

The crucial thing you must do whenever you’ve been arrested within PA for assault is to try to get in touch with a knowledgeable Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney that handles assault cases. Apart from the chance of time in jail looming in front of you, PA law also may require you to be on probation or parole, and in some cases, you will be made to register with law enforcement. A conviction for assault can potentially follow you throughout your life, and although no lawyer will be able to undo the injury that’s already been caused not just to you, but to the injured person, a knowledgeable PA criminal defense attorney can provide you with the very best defense in the courtroom. Centre County PA Criminal Defense Lawyers should be able to give you all of the information you’re looking for.

Korea court martial – Yongsan soldier gets 30 days for nightclub brawl

admin — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:13:21 +0000

Yongsan soldier gets 30 days for nightclub brawl, avoids discharge and felony conviction

By Ashley Rowland, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Wednesday, October 7, 2009
SEOUL — A sergeant at U.S. Army Garrison-Yongsan was sentenced Monday to 30 days of confinement and a reduction in rank to E-3 for hitting two other soldiers during a street brawl outside an Itaewon nightclub in February.

Sgt. Markease Joyner, of the 501st Military Intelligence Brigade, was charged with one specification of making a false official statement and two specifications of assault. As part of a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to and was convicted of two lesser offenses of assault consummated by battery. The false official statement charge was dropped.

Joyner, who was tried by military judge alone, was also sentenced to a forfeiture in pay of $300 per month for three months.

One soldier was stabbed in the chest during the Feb. 1 fight outside the popular King Club. An altercation started inside the club and spilled onto the street after police emptied the club.

Joyner testified during an Article 32 hearing in July that he got involved in the fight to defend his twin brother, Spc. Markelle Joyner, after he was allegedly attacked by Pvt. Matthew Bonham, who sustained deep cuts and bruises in the incident.

But on Monday, Sgt. Joyner said in court that he didn’t act in self-defense or to defend anyone else. Joyner’s civilian attorney, Michael Waddington, said outside court that Joyner had been defending his brother during part but not all of the fight.

Spc. Markelle Joyner was to be court-martialed Tuesday on charges of assault and making false official statements.

—————–
Michael Waddington is a court martial lawyer – court martial attorney that defends military personnel worldwide as well as deployed civilian contractors subject to the UCMJ. He defends Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, Coast Guard, and civilian contractor court martial cases. He has successfully defended military personnel as a court martial lawyer Army Navy Marine & Air Force court martials in Germany, England, San Diego, Norfolk, Jacksonville, Fort Bragg, Fort Jackson, Fort Stewart, Fort Gordon, Italy, Iraq, Kuwait, Korea, Okinawa, Japan, Yokota, and throughout the United States.

No court martial for Army Officer – Iraq war objector leaves Army

admin — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:13:21 +0000

Iraq war objector leaves Army

(AP) – 3 Oct 2009

FORT LEWIS, Wash. — An Army lieutenant who refused to deploy to Iraq in 2006, saying he believed the war was illegal, has officially left the service.
Fort Lewis spokesman Joseph Piek confirmed that Ehren Watada was discharged Friday.
Watada was charged with missing his unit’s deployment and with conduct unbecoming an officer for denouncing President Bush and the war — statements he made while explaining his actions.
His court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007. The Army wanted to try him in a second court-martial, but a federal judge said a second trial on key charges would constitute double jeopardy.
Watada lawyer Kenneth Kagan said last week that the Army had finally allowed his client to resign. Kagan added that Watada was granted a discharge “under other than honorable conditions.”
The 31-year-old Watada, a Honolulu native, has told the Honolulu Star-Bulletin he’s happy the matter has finally been resolved. Through his lawyer, Watada declined other interview requests.
Information from: The News Tribune, http://www.thenewstribune.com

admin — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:13:21 +0000

admin — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:13:20 +0000

United States: Released Marine Hopes for Appeal and Prepares for College
Joel David Klimkewicz is a United States Marine whose decision not to pick up a weapon, led to a court-martial, conviction and a seven-month jail sentence. He was released from jail at nearby Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, United States, on…
11 Apr 2005,

Joel David Klimkewicz is a United States Marine whose decision not to pick up a weapon, led to a court-martial, conviction and a seven-month jail sentence. He was released from jail at nearby Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, United States, on April 6; his prison sentence was suspended while his case is being appealed.

Ironically, Klimkewicz is hoping that one of a series of military court appeals might allow him to return to Camp Lejeune — or another installation — as a military chaplain. He said he is planning to begin religion studies at Southern Adventist University, in Collegedale, Tennessee, United States, with chaplaincy as his destination.

“That was my goal from the start of this thing,” he told Adventist News Network in a telephone interview five days after his release. Klimkewicz, 24, led a troubled life as a Marine before attending ship-board Bible studies conducted by a Seventh-day Adventist chaplain. He was converted, baptized and eventually joined the Adventist Church, where he learned that non-combatancy is the church’s recommendation, and, upon personal reflection, came to the conclusion that he could not take up a weapon to kill another person.

For now, Klimkewicz’s status is somewhat in limbo. He’s free to travel and begin his college studies, but his conviction and sentence are “frozen” while there are automatic appeals, first to a U.S. Navy/Marine Corps appellate court, then one to a combined U.S. Armed Forces appeals court. If both of these appeals are unsuccessful, a final appeal to the United States Supreme Court can be made. The process could take years to complete.

Meanwhile, Klimkewicz retains his optimism and a desire to be a chaplain.

“I’m not a conscientious objector,” he said. “I’m a conscientious cooperator; I don’t object to serving my country.”

But since that service would not allow him to take life, he couldn’t carry a weapon. Instead, he asked for non-combatant assignments such as clearing landmines, where he could help his fellow Marines but not carry a weapon. His superiors refused, and when he was ordered to pick up a rifle, Klimkewicz refused.

Klimkewicz said the greatest lesson he learned was that “we have to obey God rather than man, no matter what the consequences.” He and his family received support from the Adventist congregation in Jacksonville and from others around the country and even overseas, as evidenced by a donation sent from the Solomon Islands.

“The support of the church has been amazing, more than I could ever repay,” he told ANN.

The court-martial and sentence took its toll on Klimkewicz’s family, his wife Tomomi and their 3-year-old daughter. Mrs. Klimkewicz, a Japanese citizen, was new to the Adventist Church and the United States when the then-lance corporal’s ordeal began; backing from local church members has been vital, he said.

“She gained a lot of faith from the local church members who supported her morally and financially as well as all the church members who sent donations from around the country and all over the world,” Klimkewicz said. “She’s happy that I’m home. The separation time has actually brought us closer together, and she’s learned how to trust in God.”

While in jail, he conducted Bible studies that attracted interest from fellow prisoners, one expressing a strong interest in Adventist beliefs. He said his fellow prisoners were aware of his case and its circumstances: “When I found out I was going to be released, the prisoners in there were happier than I was that I was going to leave.”
Jacksonville, North Carolina United States,
Mark A. Kellner/ANN

admin — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:13:14 +0000

Court Martial Lawyer Michael Waddington represents Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps servicemembers facing UCMJ actions.

Underride Truck Accidents

Author — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:58:18 +0000

Accidents Involving Underriding

The phrase “underride truck accidents” describes an incident concerning a vehicle or motorcycle that drives under the trailer of a truck. The accidental injuries as a result of these sort of accidents may be catastrophic and can include brain damage and manslaughter from decapitation.

A competent personal injury attorney in Athens Georgia can help people that were involved in underride truck incidents or whose family member was killed as a result of this type of accident. A competent lawyer can develop a strong case to acquire comprehensive compensation for pain, suffering, medical related bills, lost income and other costs of the accident. Speak to an accidental injury law firm in Madison County Georgia to find out whether you have a case.

Causes of Underride Truck Incidents

Choose an experienced personal injury law firm that fights for those who have experienced severe injuries or loss of life due to accidents with causes like these:

Truck traveling without lights or with dirty or damaged reflective tape and lights
Truck driving much slower than the posted speed limit
Truck parked too near the roadway without warning cones
Truck jackknifed across narrow road without having lights or warning cones
Truck missing rear safeguard designed to stop underride accidents
Truck rear safeguard loose or defective
Truck backs into smaller vehicle

These as well as other types of underride accidents can result in catastrophic injuries which are worthy of compensation. Those who make it through such accidents often have substantial needs. They could be brain-damaged and unable to work. It’s possibly that they have experienced spinal cord injuries that led to paralysis. They may have been critically burned if their car caught fire. Whatever the nature of the injuries, the victims of these kinds of accidents will be needing long-term care, therapy and assistive devices, all of these cost money. Look for a qualified injury lawyer who will look for comprehensive compensation for their clients to enable them to afford the care they need.

To find out more regarding underride truck accidents and to understand whether it’s likely you have a case, contact a personal injury lawyer in Athens Georgia.

Find Personal Injury Lawyers in Athens immediately if you have been seriously injured by an auto accident.

Car Accident Law Firms in Athens GA might be able to get you the compensation that’s rightfully yours.

Military Lawyer Appeals Court Martial on Grounds of Prejudice

admin — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:16:21 +0000

Military Lawyer Appeals Court Martial on Grounds of Prejudice

Material prejudice from error

In United States v. Moore, 67 M.J. 753 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2009) the Appellant pled guilty, and was found guilty, at a judge alone special court-martial, for wrongful use of alprazolam (Xanax), divers uses of marijuana, and larceny.

The adjudged and approved sentence was a bad-conduct discharge, five months confinement, and reduction to E-1. The issue in this case was whether the use of Appellant’s positive urinalysis tests, conducted after the period of charged marijuana use, were improper evidence in aggravation. The Court concluded that it was plain error to permit the documents and the Appellant suffered material prejudice because of the error. The AFCCA’s analysis in the case reinforces the importance of complying with the specific requirements of R.C.M. 1001.

“[T]he question is not whether the appellant’s continued use of marijuana while pending court-martial charges is aggravating—certainly it is, and it has a direct impact on good order and discipline. The question is whether the subsequent uses make the former use aggravating in a way consistent with the limitations of R.C.M. 1001(b)(4) and case precedent. We find that it does not.”

The ACCA analyzed the two limitations on aggravation evidence: (1) it should be directly connected to the charged offenses; and (2) it should pass a M.R.E. 403 balancing. In this case, the positive urinalysis tests after the charged period were not “directly related” to the charged offenses. When the aggravation evidence is uncharged misconduct, it must involve a continuous course of conduct with the charged offense. Regarding uncharged drug use specifically, the court applied the test from United States v. Hardison, 64 M.J. 279, 282 (C.A.A.F. 2007), that held uncharged misconduct should be “closely related in time, type, and/or often outcome, to the convicted crime.”

In Hardison, the court held that past service drug use failed this test when there was a three-year gap between the pre-service use and the charged use. Although though the time separation in this case was just a few months, the ACCA still did not find the uncharged misconduct to be “directly related” absent any specific evidence showing the uses were related; “[t]o conclude otherwise would simply result in the conclusion that all drug usage is aggravating to any charged drug usage.”

The Court acknowledges that the limitations in R.C.M. 1001 have been criticized, but points out the government has other options when the rules prohibit admitting uncharged misconduct in aggravation; the government could “incorporat[e] the essence of that misconduct in opinion testimony, refer additional charges, or try to admit it under R.C.M. 1001(b)(2) as properly maintained personnel records.” An experienced military lawyer can successfully challenge a guilty verdict and have it overturned.

If you have been held guilty by a court martial, consult with an experienced court martial lawyer. Court martial attorneys understand the complex rules and procedures of military law and can use them to your advantage. Consult with a military attorney if you are facing court martial. A military attorney can provide you with invaluable advice and service that can save your military career.

Sexual Assault in the Army, Navy Air Force and Marine Corps Reporting Policy

admin — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:06:00 +0000

Sexual Assault in the Army, Navy Air Force and Marine Corps Reporting Policy from DoDD 6495.01, October 6, 2005

Note: If you are accused of a sex crime in the military, then contact an experienced sex crime court martial lawyer.

E3.1.1. The Department of Defense recognizes the potential impact restricted reporting may have on investigations and the ability of the alleged offender’s commander to hold the offender accountable. However, this policy decision represents the judgment that such risks have been carefully considered but were outweighed by the overall interest in providing sexual assault victims this form of support.

E3.1.2. This enclosure provides the framework for the confidential reporting program and its policies. The SAPRO will coordinate specific implementation details consistent with this policy, in conjunction with the Military Departments. This SAPR Program requires extensive, in-depth training for DoD personnel and specialized training for Commanders, Senior Enlisted Leaders, VA, SARC, investigators, law enforcement, chaplains, HCP, healthcare personnel, and legal personnel.
E3.1.3. See restricted reporting as defined in enclosure 2.

E3.1.4. The Department of Defense is committed to ensuring victims of sexual assault are protected, treated with dignity and respect, and provided support, advocacy and care. DoD policy also strongly supports effective command awareness and prevention programs, as well as law enforcement and criminal justice procedures that enable persons to be held accountable for their actions, which includes appropriate criminal dispositions for sexual assault. To achieve these dual objectives, DoD policy prefers complete reporting of sexual assaults to activate both victims’ services and accountability actions. However, recognizing a mandate of complete reporting may represent a barrier for victims to access services when the victim desires no command or law enforcement involvement, there is a need to provide an option for confidential restricted reporting.

E3.1.5. Assuring privacy and providing a confidential disclosure option for sexual assault victims is critical to discharging the military’s commitment to providing care and support for victims of sexual assault. Sexual assault is one of the most under-reported violent crimes in our society and in the military. Although the victim’s decision to report is a crucial step following a sexual assault, reporting is often precluded by the victim’s desire for no one to know what happened. The Commanders have a responsibility to ensure community safety and due process of law, but they must also recognize the importance of protecting the privacy of victims under their command. Subject matter experts agree that a system which promotes privacy and confidentiality can have a positive impact in bringing victims forward to provide information about being assaulted.

Sexual Assault Court Martial Attorney Michael Waddington represents Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps servicemembers facing UCMJ actions.

Department of Defense Sexual Assault Reporting – UCMJ Sex Crimes

admin — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:04:00 +0000

CONFIDENTIAL REPORTING PROGRAM FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT – from DoDD 6495.01, October 6, 2005

E3.1.6. Recognizing these DoD interests as a matter of DoD policy, Service members who are sexually assaulted will now have the following reporting options:

E3.1.6.1. Unrestricted Reporting. A Service member who is sexually assaulted and desires medical treatment, counseling, and an official investigation of his or her allegation should use existing reporting channels (e.g., chain of command, law enforcement, or report the incident to the SARC). When notified of a reported sexual assault, the SARC will immediately assign a VA. Additionally, at the victim’s discretion or request, the healthcare provider shall arrange a SAFE (see paragraph E2.1.13.) to be conducted, which may include the collection of evidence. Details regarding the incident will be limited to only those personnel who have a legitimate need to know.

E3.1.6.2. Restricted Reporting. Restricted reporting allows a sexual assault victim to confidentially disclose the details of his or her assault to specified individuals and receive medical treatment and counseling, without triggering the official investigative process. Service members who are sexually assaulted and desire restricted reporting under this policy may only report the assault to the SARC, VA, or healthcare personnela HCP. However, consistent with current policy, they may also report the assault to a chaplain. Although a report to a chaplain is not a restricted report under this policy or the provisions of this Directive, it is a communication that may be protected under the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) or applicable statutes and regulations. The restricted reporting process does not affect any privilege recognized under the MRE. This Directive and its policy on restricted reporting is in addition to the current protections afforded privileged communications with a chaplain, and does not alter or affect those protections.

E3.1.6.2.1. Healthcare personnelHCP will initiate the appropriate care and treatment, and report the sexual assault to the SARC instead of reporting the assault to law enforcement or the command. When notified of a reported sexual assault, the SARC will immediately assign a VA. The assigned VA will provide the victim accurate information on the reporting process, including both restricted and unrestricted reporting procedures. Additionally, at the victim’s discretion or request, the healthcare providerHCP, if appropriately trained and/or supervised, shall conduct a SAFE, which may include the collection of evidence. If the healthcare provider is not appropriately trained to conduct a SAFE, the healthcare providerHCP shall help arrange for a properly-trained DoD healthcare providerHCP, if available. In the absence of a DoD healthcare providerHCP, the victim will be appropriately referred to a non-DoD healthcare providerHCP for the SAFE. When SAFE is performed at local civilian medical facilities, those facilities are bound by State and local laws, which may require reporting the sexual assault. The victim will acknowledge, in writing, his or her understanding of restricted reporting, the exceptions to, and limitations on, restricted reporting. This acknowledgement will also include the victim’s understanding that restricted reporting may limit the ability of the Government to prosecute the assailant and an understanding of the reasons DoD policy favors unrestricted reporting.

ENCLOSURE 3

E3.1.6.2.2. Restricted reporting is intended to give victims additional time and increased control over the release and management of their personal information, and to empower them to seek relevant information and support to make more informed decisions about participating in the criminal investigation. A victim who receives appropriate care and treatment, and is provided an opportunity to make an informed decision about a criminal investigation, is more likely to develop increased trust that his or her needs are of primary concern to the command and may eventually lead the victim to decide to pursue an official investigation. Even if the victim chooses not to pursue an official investigation, this additional reporting avenue gives the senior commander a clearer picture of the sexual violence within the command, and enhances the senior commander’s ability to provide a safe environment and contributes to the well-being and mission-readiness of all of its sService members.

E3.1.7. In cases where a victim elects restricted reporting, the SARC, assigned VA (whether uniformed or civilian), and healthcare personnelHCPs may not disclose covered communications to law enforcement or command authorities, either within or outside the Department of Defense, except as provided in paragraph E3.1.8. For purposes of public safety and command responsibility, the SARC shall report information concerning sexual assault incidents, without information that could reasonably lead to personal identification of the victim or the alleged assailant, to the senior commander (see paragraph E2.1.10.) within 24 hours of the sexual assault report.

Sex Assault Court Martial Lawyer Michael Waddington represents Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps servicemembers facing UCMJ actions.