<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388</id><updated>2009-07-02T06:12:58.705-07:00</updated><title type="text">Cratchit.org News &amp; Commentary</title><subtitle type="html">Cratchit.org maintains the VIC CRM and TimeTool open source projects.</subtitle><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cratchit.org/blog/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cratchit.org/blog/atom.xml" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>123</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CratchitorgNewsCommentary" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-4457698722741942003</id><published>2009-06-17T06:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-17T06:56:33.291-07:00</updated><title type="text">Cligs Cracked; TinyURL is A-OK</title><summary type="text">I hate it when "clever" headline writers mislead their readers. Take this one, for instance, from ComputerWorld:Hacker cracks TinyURL rival, redirects millions of Twitter users This borders on the irresponsible. There you have TinyURL, prominent and mostly in caps, with that tiny little "rival" next to it.  This story has nothing to do with TinyURL, but they're the one associated with the hack by</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/4457698722741942003/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=4457698722741942003" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4457698722741942003" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4457698722741942003" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/FpHGkEqtz5Y/cligs-cracked-tinyurl-is-ok.html" title="Cligs Cracked; TinyURL is A-OK" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/06/cligs-cracked-tinyurl-is-ok.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-6919955249299785364</id><published>2009-06-16T17:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T23:55:32.008-07:00</updated><title type="text">Project Xanadu</title><summary type="text">This is one of those posts where I really don't want to be mean, but I have to be.Often the computer systems that we create today don't hold a candle to the things that were envisioned for computers at the very outset.  For instance, I'm still in awe of what Douglas Englebart was able to accomplish back in the 1960s. (I've written at length about that in "Why you need VIC CRM".)  On the other </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/6919955249299785364/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=6919955249299785364" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6919955249299785364" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6919955249299785364" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/Cn-KxvKrq8U/project-xanadu.html" title="Project Xanadu" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/06/project-xanadu.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-3303084301682397029</id><published>2009-05-28T10:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-28T12:44:24.423-07:00</updated><title type="text">They're reinventing the wheel (again)</title><summary type="text">There have been a few new product announcements that have really amazed me lately due to their obvious "me-too"-ness where the press have somehow been hoodwinked into believing that there's something innovative going on. All I can conclude is that the computing media are made up of sheltered children who never saw a computer before they graduated and got their current jobs.Specifically I'm </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/3303084301682397029/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=3303084301682397029" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3303084301682397029" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3303084301682397029" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/M3YR_lk09Jg/theyre-reinventing-wheel-again.html" title="They're reinventing the wheel (again)" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/05/theyre-reinventing-wheel-again.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-1562225915584595220</id><published>2009-05-03T06:51:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T07:46:31.258-07:00</updated><title type="text">Randy Pausch on Time Management</title><summary type="text">I don't know how I missed this talk by Randy Pausch on Time Management, but it's excellent. Please, please, please make the time to watch it: you'll be glad you did.Not only does he pass on general principles in an entertaining way; he provides advice on specific techniques and tools to make you more productive.Now here are my totally self-serving observations: Randy mentions that [as of the time</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/1562225915584595220/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=1562225915584595220" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/1562225915584595220" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/1562225915584595220" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/LsPGrCDdigk/randy-pausch-on-time-management.html" title="Randy Pausch on Time Management" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/05/randy-pausch-on-time-management.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-6151988106251902387</id><published>2009-04-20T19:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-20T19:25:17.779-07:00</updated><title type="text">Microsoft to open source: Please don't compete on price!</title><summary type="text">This article by Matt Asay says quite enough.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/6151988106251902387/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=6151988106251902387" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6151988106251902387" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6151988106251902387" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/i6dwWYaeV5k/microsoft-to-open-source-please-dont.html" title="Microsoft to open source: Please don't compete on price!" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/04/microsoft-to-open-source-please-dont.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-4695634927622028624</id><published>2009-04-10T19:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-10T21:11:07.378-07:00</updated><title type="text">An Egg for Easter</title><summary type="text">Here's a neat little Easter egg I just learned about for Microsoft Word (if by this time you don't know that an "Easter egg" is a hidden feature, then get educated here).In Word, type in "=lorem(p,s)" minus the quotes where p is the number of paragraphs and s is the number of sentences per paragraph. Entering "=lorem(200,4)" will give you about 10 pages of output that looks something like this:</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/4695634927622028624/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=4695634927622028624" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4695634927622028624" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4695634927622028624" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/zOG0lyoAcKQ/egg-for-easter.html" title="An Egg for Easter" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/04/egg-for-easter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-6031533806374509607</id><published>2009-04-07T08:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-07T14:52:24.240-07:00</updated><title type="text">Cool websites you should visit.</title><summary type="text">Today I thought I'd pass on a few interesting and useful websites I've run across.Some are reference, some are tools... the only real rule I've got here is that I'm not posting links to any Google websites... I've got a separate list for that. I'm also steering clear of the obviously popular sites, such as Wikipedia and IMDB. I'm also limiting myself to a baker's dozen this time 'round.So, with </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/6031533806374509607/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=6031533806374509607" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6031533806374509607" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6031533806374509607" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/1bVguQQHlsQ/cool-websites-you-should-visit.html" title="Cool websites you should visit." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/04/cool-websites-you-should-visit.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-4220820579738407184</id><published>2009-02-17T07:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-17T12:31:17.284-08:00</updated><title type="text">Handicapped features in Linux</title><summary type="text">In the course of a discussion on Paul Murphy's ZDNet talkbacks, Roger Ramjet noted an issue with accessibility features for Linux.First, background. Able people often don't consider the difficulties encountered by the handicapped in using a modern computer. With text-based (DOS) computers it was pretty easy... a screen reader for the blind and you're pretty much done. But with GUIs it's really, </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/4220820579738407184/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=4220820579738407184" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4220820579738407184" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4220820579738407184" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/kFOxLDLPLaA/handicapped-features-in-linux.html" title="Handicapped features in Linux" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/02/handicapped-features-in-linux.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-4724606190983412745</id><published>2009-02-01T12:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-01T21:24:14.499-08:00</updated><title type="text">While you weren't looking, Linux got great.</title><summary type="text">I had an older Windows box that needed to be re-installed. (It's an HP Optiplex). Now, this isn't a crap machine. It's a 2.2GHz processor with a very decent video card.  But it didn't come to me with a restore disk, so I called Dell to get one. Sadly, they couldn't hep me out because it originally shipped with Windows 2000. The restore disks are no longer being manufactured. They couldn't send a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/4724606190983412745/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=4724606190983412745" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4724606190983412745" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/4724606190983412745" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/jVHsxZ-Sejs/while-you-werent-looking-linux-got.html" title="While you weren't looking, Linux got great." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/02/while-you-werent-looking-linux-got.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-1544826659091346944</id><published>2009-01-24T10:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-24T10:34:15.310-08:00</updated><title type="text">Conficker ("Downadup") is nasty</title><summary type="text">My eldest son's computer contracted a nasty bit of malware a couple of weeks ago, which I had to remove manually (NONE of the antivirus software caught it). And believe me, tracking it down and removing it manually without knowing what it was was no easy thing. He's lucky I'm his dad, otherwise the repair could have been hugely expensive.It was the "Conficker" worm, aka "Downadup".Fortunately for</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/1544826659091346944/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=1544826659091346944" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/1544826659091346944" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/1544826659091346944" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/ZR75JIiLunc/conficker-downadup-is-nasty.html" title="Conficker (&quot;Downadup&quot;) is nasty" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/01/conficker-downadup-is-nasty.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-527808507244718491</id><published>2009-01-06T20:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-07T10:04:11.886-08:00</updated><title type="text">Why BitTorrent is Slow</title><summary type="text">Every BitTorrent vendor promises you that BitTorrent provides blazingly fast downloads. This is a lie.  Weeeell, it's not technically a lie, and it's not an intentional lie, but in practice it's a lie nonetheless.Here's the theory. BitTorrent works by having many users share pieces of the file among themselves. Seeds have complete copies of the file, and peers don't. By sending different pieces </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/527808507244718491/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=527808507244718491" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/527808507244718491" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/527808507244718491" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/HE2jFUjppcA/why-bittorrent-is-slow.html" title="Why BitTorrent is Slow" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2009/01/why-bittorrent-is-slow.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-8252011145242365540</id><published>2008-10-14T04:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-14T06:41:15.036-07:00</updated><title type="text">Is Cloud Computing worth it?</title><summary type="text">In my last post I related that in eWeek magazine (Oct 13, 2008), Jason Brooks asks "Does OpenOffice.org Still Matter?" He's wondering if, given on-line suites, if OpenOffice.org will matter in the future. Yesterday I addressed the quality of the software, but today I'd like to look at the on-line software concept and whether Software-as-a-service (SaaS or "cloud computing") advantages outweigh </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/8252011145242365540/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=8252011145242365540" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8252011145242365540" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8252011145242365540" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/Bw4e5l9x3p8/is-cloud-computing-worth-it.html" title="Is Cloud Computing worth it?" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/10/is-cloud-computing-worth-it.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-7394101525308480547</id><published>2008-10-13T19:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-13T20:38:58.370-07:00</updated><title type="text">OpenOffice.org 3 is Released.</title><summary type="text">OpenOffice.org 3 has been released. It's fast it's sweet, get it.  You may have to wait your turn... the demand is so great that the servers have crashed. Here's the message that mailing list members received:All,We must apologize. OpenOffice.org 3.0 is proving immensely,staggeringly popular. And our site is down as a result. While we fixthings, we urge you to be patient and try again later on </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/7394101525308480547/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=7394101525308480547" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/7394101525308480547" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/7394101525308480547" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/wEDgeUa52Qg/openofficeorg-3-is-released.html" title="OpenOffice.org 3 is Released." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/10/openofficeorg-3-is-released.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-5623881800379232875</id><published>2008-09-24T06:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-24T09:24:19.304-07:00</updated><title type="text">Using VIC: Managing Calls</title><summary type="text">"Out of the box" VIC CRM is geared toward the worker who spends most of his time in front of the computer and on the phone. When you create a new JournalEntry the default JournalEntry type is always "Phone Call". The rationale here is simple: when you receive a phone call you need to be able to start documenting it as soon as possible, with no delays at all. Other systems require you to gather </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/5623881800379232875/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=5623881800379232875" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/5623881800379232875" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/5623881800379232875" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/x0LtQ9JPFik/using-vic-managing-calls.html" title="Using VIC: Managing Calls" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/using-vic-managing-calls.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-3185052647771859122</id><published>2008-09-15T12:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-15T13:13:37.231-07:00</updated><title type="text">Using VIC: from Project to Sale</title><summary type="text">In my last Using VIC post, I described how to use Projects to manage complicated groups of tasks. These can be generic projects of the sort you'd use Microsoft Project for; or Sales oriented methodologies to help you manage a sale from working the lead to closing the contract. I also promised I'd show you how to turn the Project into a Sales Order and an Invoice.Remember that a Sales Project </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/3185052647771859122/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=3185052647771859122" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3185052647771859122" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3185052647771859122" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/pFpVFuuSjb8/using-vic-from-project-to-sale.html" title="Using VIC: from Project to Sale" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/using-vic-from-project-to-sale.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-3417076982276740063</id><published>2008-09-11T21:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-11T22:05:27.744-07:00</updated><title type="text">Guinea Pig Wanted.</title><summary type="text">For several years I've been distributing VIC CRM without any setup program. As a result, only hardcore bleed-yellow Lotus geeks have been able to get it to work without assistance.Well, I'm just about finished with the VIC Installer. If you're running Notes and want to be the first kid on the block to try this out -- pre-release -- email me with "Guinea Pig" in the subject. You shouldn't have any</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/3417076982276740063/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=3417076982276740063" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3417076982276740063" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/3417076982276740063" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/LbtGjcRTz7o/guinea-pig-wanted.html" title="Guinea Pig Wanted." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/guinea-pig-wanted.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-6347065951242617308</id><published>2008-09-07T06:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-07T06:57:21.540-07:00</updated><title type="text">Using VIC: Projects and Tasks</title><summary type="text">Last time I described how to use the basic features of VIC to facilitate the GTD (Getting Things Done) method of time management. This time I'll be describing how to manage a larger group of tasks as a VIC Project. If you're using GTD principles you would use Projects to schedule and manage complicated work that can't be done in a few sittings or by one person.Projects is a new feature of VIC. </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/6347065951242617308/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=6347065951242617308" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6347065951242617308" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6347065951242617308" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/CNYzjfOf1JY/using-vic-projects-and-tasks.html" title="Using VIC: Projects and Tasks" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/using-vic-projects-and-tasks.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-8749325876297898042</id><published>2008-09-06T05:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-06T11:59:00.605-07:00</updated><title type="text">Using VIC: Getting Things Done</title><summary type="text">On a typical day I'll get dozens of emails ranging from newsletters and ads to requests for service (of various priorities). How do we turn these into actions? And how does VIC expedite the process? Does it work with GTD (Getting Things Done)?If you're familiar with VIC CRM you already know that it automatically organizes your mail as it's imported into the VIC Journal. This means it's  easily </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/8749325876297898042/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=8749325876297898042" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8749325876297898042" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8749325876297898042" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/McprXbgTGEU/using-vic-getting-things-done.html" title="Using VIC: Getting Things Done" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/using-vic-getting-things-done.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-6102816708663512694</id><published>2008-09-03T06:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-03T07:15:07.399-07:00</updated><title type="text">Chrome: Google Does Evil.</title><summary type="text">Google's released it's own browser, Chrome. Other people are doing in-depth reviews, so I won't. (Here are a couple: ComputerWorld. ZDNet.) However, I'd like to pass on a few first impressions. In doing so, I can't help but make comparisons to my favorite browser, Firefox. I doing the review I found a MAJOR show-stopper for the adoption of Chrome, Docs, or any SaaS from Google. I'm saving the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/6102816708663512694/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=6102816708663512694" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6102816708663512694" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/6102816708663512694" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/EE646WTEcTU/chrome-google-does-evil.html" title="Chrome: Google Does Evil." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/09/chrome-google-does-evil.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-8515110584280182230</id><published>2008-08-27T09:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-27T12:04:25.091-07:00</updated><title type="text">More on broken metaphors</title><summary type="text">In my last post I talked a bit about how it's our fault as programmers if users are confused by the user interface metaphors we use. We do use a lot of metaphors in programming, and mangle and mix most of them. Last post it was using "print screen" as a metaphor for copying the screen rather than as a literal command to print the screen. Users are understandably dumbfounded by the nonsensical </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/8515110584280182230/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=8515110584280182230" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8515110584280182230" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8515110584280182230" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/zGfTMeEbiuM/more-on-broken-metaphors.html" title="More on broken metaphors" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/08/more-on-broken-metaphors.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-2937067610714689485</id><published>2008-08-27T01:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-27T10:54:05.084-07:00</updated><title type="text">UI Metaphors and Floundering Users IT support workers.</title><summary type="text">In the "Shark Bait" forum of ComputerWorld I found this interesting item:Topic(s):  Floundering Users   Submitted by:  jeitzen – Mon, 08/25/2008  –  08:45        Got in this morning and found a message waiting for me in the support inbox. When I push the print screen button on my keyboard to get a screen print to attach to a document, the print screen never prints. Please adviseThank you Like I </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/2937067610714689485/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=2937067610714689485" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/2937067610714689485" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/2937067610714689485" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/dC3v7wNuaXM/metaphors-and-clueless-users-it-support.html" title="UI Metaphors and Floundering &lt;strike&gt;Users&lt;/strike&gt; IT support workers." /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/08/metaphors-and-clueless-users-it-support.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-718072376294975514</id><published>2008-08-15T17:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-15T17:55:14.640-07:00</updated><title type="text">So what's been going on?</title><summary type="text">I've been EXTREMELY busy. Unfortunately, I haven't been busy with VIC CRM... I've had some bills to pay. As for details, you're not getting any. But I expect to be able to  have a nice update for VIC CRM by Halloween.For now, I've done a bit of a bug fix for some annoying errors with VIC's email.WARNING: This is for Lotus geeks. For everyone else, I'm putting together some new templates.Here's a </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/718072376294975514/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=718072376294975514" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/718072376294975514" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/718072376294975514" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/NZwxppA3ycA/so-whats-been-going-on.html" title="So what's been going on?" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/08/so-whats-been-going-on.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-8416507798983865619</id><published>2008-07-10T08:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-10T12:44:22.990-07:00</updated><title type="text">Lotus Notes and Gmail Revisited</title><summary type="text">To my post, How to Configure Lotus Notes for GMail, I received the following comment from "Stephanie". The answer is a little long for a comment, so I'm posting it here.Who knew you'd still have comments about a 2 year old posting :)My team is testing the Google Apps, gmail service. So, essentially, I can send e-mails through the web-based gmail client from my work domain name. Google Apps </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/8416507798983865619/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=8416507798983865619" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8416507798983865619" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8416507798983865619" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/gCBtXx1txiU/to-my-post-how-to-configure-lotus-notes.html" title="Lotus Notes and Gmail Revisited" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/07/to-my-post-how-to-configure-lotus-notes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-8061951045903921148</id><published>2008-07-01T14:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-01T15:05:04.375-07:00</updated><title type="text">Goodbye Monopoly, Hello Competition</title><summary type="text">On the last day of June Microsoft quietly announced that they would be releasing the technical specifications of the binary formats for Microsoft Office.  This includes Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and the Drawing specifications for Office 97-2007. It is licensed under the "Microsoft Open Specification Promise" (OSP) which may (or may not) be compatible with software licensed under the GPL. Opinions </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/8061951045903921148/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=8061951045903921148" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8061951045903921148" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/8061951045903921148" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/KBwAi1ulRJI/goodbye-monopoly-hello-competition.html" title="Goodbye Monopoly, Hello Competition" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/07/goodbye-monopoly-hello-competition.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6966388.post-2724791980754250394</id><published>2008-05-24T07:51:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-05-24T09:34:57.785-07:00</updated><title type="text">Microsoft Adopts ODF: Do Thou Likewise</title><summary type="text">As reported by David Worthington in the SDTimes, Office 2007 won't support ISO's OOXML. That's the XML format that Microsoft spent so much time and lobbying effort to "fasttrack" through the standards process, and which is based upon the XML formats of Microsoft Office (MS Office's XML formats are similar to, but not compliant with, OOXML).Citing lack of demand, Microsoft will forego support for </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/2724791980754250394/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6966388&amp;postID=2724791980754250394" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/2724791980754250394" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6966388/posts/default/2724791980754250394" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CratchitorgNewsCommentary/~3/sCxx52yohVY/microsoft-adopts-odf-do-thou-likewise.html" title="Microsoft Adopts ODF: Do Thou Likewise" /><author><name>Dave Leigh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08617556290378317379</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03590998305733267419" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.cratchit.org/blog/2008/05/microsoft-adopts-odf-do-thou-likewise.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
