<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creativiste</title>
	<atom:link href="https://creativiste.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='creativiste.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://creativiste.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Creativiste" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://creativiste.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>EINTKABILFR:  5 Sales Rules for Introverts</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/eintkabilfr-5-sales-rules-for-introverts/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/eintkabilfr-5-sales-rules-for-introverts/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits of creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EINTKABILFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/eintkabilfr-5-sales-rules-for-introverts/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[*EINTKABILFR: Everything I Need To Know About Business, I Learned From Rock Sales is one of the hardest aspects of business for a lot of people to learn, because the methodologies and strategies are rarely cut and dried. Instead, the prevailing way to view sales is that it is the province of &#8220;naturals&#8221; and con-men; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>*EINTKABILFR:  Everything I Need To Know About Business, I Learned From Rock</strong></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sales is one of the hardest aspects of business for a lot of people to learn, because the methodologies and strategies are rarely cut and dried.  Instead, the prevailing way to view sales is that it is the province of &#8220;naturals&#8221; and con-men; that simply being a fast talker can make or break you as a salesperson.  This leads to both fear of the actual process, and contempt for people who are truly good at it among those who aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Managing a band requires a lot of sales skills, and they can be tough to learn and practice.  For one thing, if you&#8217;re in the band, your ego is at stake; you&#8217;re not just selling life insurance or something else that originates from somebody else, you&#8217;re selling your art!  Here are the lessons I&#8217;ve learned from the experience:</p>
<ol>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Avoid discounting; either give something for free or charge your rate.</strong><span>  The first time a band ever plays, and many times after that (particularly for &#8220;big&#8221; opportunities), they&#8217;re grateful just for the opportunity to perform.  Add to that the fact that most clubs and other purchasers of music are, well, kind of poor, and it sounds like discounting would be a great idea.  It&#8217;s not.  The problem is that it changes the <em>perceived value</em> of what you&#8217;re selling.  Not only will you get paid less than you&#8217;re worth, but you&#8217;ll have to deal with sub-par performance on the buyer side everywhere.  Back in my college days, we played frat parties for $100 and beer, and others for $1000.  The difference?  At the $100 gigs, we&#8217;d have to scrounge up a PA, play without a stage, load our own gear in and out, and fight out way through the lines for the aforementioned beer.  By any reasonable measure of time and effort, we were operating at a loss, and it wasn&#8217;t helping our public image or marketability at all.  At the $1000 gigs, we&#8217;d have a pro soundman there to make us sound great, a stage, and a horde of fraternity brothers to move our stuff and bring us drinks.  We were treated like rock stars because they were <em>paying</em> for rock stars.  Their parties were also much bigger, since they wanted to get their money&#8217;s worth out of us.  They just cared more.  We probably could have gotten that caring out of the $100 gigs if we had just said, &#8220;look, our rate is $1000, but we like you guys.  Just provide the PA and we&#8217;ll play and make sure everybody&#8217;s having a good time.&#8221;  Either way, you&#8217;re a $1000 band; it&#8217;s just a question of whether a particular night would pay.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Promise and deliver big.</strong><span><strong> </strong></span>It&#8217;s often said that you should &#8220;under-promise and over-deliver&#8221;.  This may be true if you are well-known, or operating in a very protected or stable market; but most of us aren&#8217;t. In the music business &#8211; and most others &#8211; getting people&#8217;s <em>attention</em> is a critical first step to proper selling.  And to do that, you have to make some big promises.  You don&#8217;t necessarily have to be &#8220;better&#8221; than the alternatives, but you do have to be exceptional in some (positive) way.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Be willing to negotiate the extras.</strong><span> </span>For most business relationships, it&#8217;s only the first interaction that &#8220;feels like&#8221; you&#8217;re selling.  Once your band has played at a certain club, you know the people there.  Assuming that neither you nor the club&#8217;s management are impossible to deal with, and the first gig was at least a moderate success, you will be able to play there in the future.  (This coming from a guy whose band was banned from several clubs in the mid-Atlantic for various reasons&#8230;)  So that first time, recognize that &#8211; while you shouldn&#8217;t <em>discount</em> (see #1 above) &#8211;  you should at least be flexible on the non-essential parts of the relationship.  It&#8217;s really not THAT big of a deal if a club insists that you use the drugged-out house soundman the first time you play.  With any luck, you&#8217;ll build trust in the future and be able to make other requests in the name of making your shows there successful.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Have faith in what you&#8217;re selling. </strong>This one may or may not be within your control, but&#8230; it&#8217;s a lot easier to sell something that you know is worth what you&#8217;re asking.<span> A lot of people get nervous when asked to sell because, at heart, they know it just isn&#8217;t that great of a product or service</span>.  This is doubly-complicated in a &#8220;knowledge-worker&#8221; kind of job, like music or consulting, since the value of the service is so subjective.  At the risk of sounding preachy:  If you don&#8217;t believe the product is good enough, then work harder on it or find another product to sell.  There aren&#8217;t a lot of shortcuts around this.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Be nice.</strong><span> The bottom line, as hinted in the earlier tips, is that just being a pleasant, easy-to-deal-with person is half the battle; maybe more than that</span>.  The reason is simple &#8211; as soon as you cross the threshold from &#8220;person trying to get the business&#8221; to &#8220;person who can reliably deliver what they promise or better without being a prima donna or other variety of pain in the ass&#8221;, you can build on that and your need to do &#8220;sales&#8221;, per se, goes down to just a bare minimum.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/eintkabilfr-5-sales-rules-for-introverts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Paradox of Talent</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/the-paradox-of-talent/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/the-paradox-of-talent/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits of creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/the-paradox-of-talent/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Recently, I stumbled across a bunch of one-liners er, &#8220;slideshow&#8221;, on BusinessWeek&#8217;s site from last June in which Marissa Mayer of Google divulged her secrets for corporate innovation. Some of these were well-known nuggets about Google&#8217;s famously open culture (e.g., &#8220;Employees get one day off a week to work on their own projects&#8221;); some were [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I stumbled across a <strike>bunch of one-liners</strike> er, &#8220;slideshow&#8221;, on BusinessWeek&#8217;s site from last June in which Marissa Mayer of Google <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/06/marissa_mayer/index_01.htm" target="_blank">divulged her secrets</a> for corporate innovation.  Some of these were well-known nuggets about Google&#8217;s famously open culture (e.g., &#8220;Employees get one day off a week to work on their own projects&#8221;); some were obvious truisms of the sort that your typical BusinessWeek reader would find innovative (e.g., &#8220;launch early and often in small beta tests&#8221;).  Most of them seemed like good ideas, in general.  But there was one that stuck out because it&#8217;s a mantra I&#8217;ve heard a few too many times:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin approve hires.  They favor intelligence over experience.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I was immediately reminded of a fantastic work by Malcolm Gladwell entitled <a href="http://www.changethis.com/6.TalentMyth" target="_blank">The Talent Myth</a>.  Writing in October 2004, in the wake of the Enron scandal and the accompanying widespread loss of faith in American businesses big and small, Gladwell wrote a compelling analysis of the role that Enron&#8217;s &#8220;talent first&#8221; culture played in its demise.  In a nutshell, he argues that the company &#8211; spurred by McKinsey &#8211; repeatedly rewarded people who <em>appeared</em> brilliant by virtue of confidence, apparent intellectual prowess, test scores, and other superficial metrics.  In the process, Gladwell says, Enron created a culture where potential (fuzzily measured) was valued far more than results (precisely measured, but usually far after the fact), and promoted people at a pace at which it became easy to outrun the consequences of their decisions.</p>
<p>Intelligence is obviously important.  But intelligence doesn&#8217;t guarantee performance.   So how do you find people that will <em>really</em> drive your company forward?</p>
<p>Marc Andreessen has an <a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/how_to_hire_the.html" target="_blank">excellent post</a> up that argues convincingly that &#8220;Intelligence, per se, is overrated,&#8221; citing the mythology around early-90s Microsoft and present-day Google for promoting the idea that hiring the &#8220;smartest people around&#8221; will lead to insane levels of success.  Andreessen hires for drive, curiosity, and ethics.</p>
<p>Personally, I think &#8220;drive&#8221; is overrated as well &#8211; it&#8217;s really easy to hire assholes when you focus on that, especially when it&#8217;s motivated by the wrong things, and they can do a lot more harm than good.  I don&#8217;t have the answers (although I&#8217;ll propose some in a later post)&#8230; so I&#8217;m curious to hear what others think the most important traits of a good recruit are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/the-paradox-of-talent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next year, we can get Powerpoint drunk&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/next-year-we-can-get-powerpoint-drunk/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/next-year-we-can-get-powerpoint-drunk/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[performing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public speaking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/next-year-we-can-get-powerpoint-drunk/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PowerPoint turned 20 yesterday, triggering a couple of laps around the blogosphere for the old &#8220;Tufte vs. hapless speakers everywhere&#8221; debate. A couple of interesting articles included one focused on its founders (here at wsj.com; h/t Freakonomics) and another that sent me towards a couple of older posts by the likes of Seth Godin and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PowerPoint turned 20 yesterday, triggering a couple of laps around the blogosphere for the old &#8220;<a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint" target="_blank">Tufte</a> vs. hapless speakers everywhere&#8221; debate.  A couple of interesting articles included one focused on its founders (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118228116940840904.html?mod=blogs" target="_blank">here</a> at wsj.com; h/t <a href="http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/2007/06/20/dont-hate-powerpoint-hate-the-powerpointers/" target="_blank">Freakonomics</a>) and another that sent me towards a couple of older posts by the likes of <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2007/01/really_bad_powe.html" target="_blank">Seth Godin</a> and <a href="http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2007/06/bite_your_tongu.html" target="_blank">Guy Kawasaki</a> on how to use it without sucking.  (I mean, &#8220;eat protein&#8221;&#8230; now <em>that&#8217;s</em> advice you probably wouldn&#8217;t have come up with on your own.)</p>
<p>Still, in a perfect world, PowerPoint would only be used for <a href="http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/3097" target="_blank">karaoke</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/21/next-year-we-can-get-powerpoint-drunk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EINTKABILFR:  5 Ways to Accidentally Become Better at Public Speaking</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/eintkabilfr-5-ways-to-accidentally-become-better-at-public-speaking/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/eintkabilfr-5-ways-to-accidentally-become-better-at-public-speaking/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[EINTKABILFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public speaking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/eintkabilfr-5-ways-to-accidentally-become-better-at-public-speaking/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This blog is mainly about freeing the creative impulse from the confines of those fields we typically think of as “creative” – the performing and visual arts, for instance – and understanding how it can create better results in other domains. But just as the world of business has its creative aspects, the world of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">This blog is mainly about freeing the creative impulse from the confines of those fields we typically think of as “creative” – the performing and visual arts, for instance – and understanding how it can create better results in other domains.<span>  </span>But just as the world of business has its creative aspects, the world of performance has its business aspects as well.<span>  </span>Every so often I’ll put up a EINTKABILFR post about that relationship.<span>  </span>Today:<span>  </span>public speaking.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was thrust into the lead singing role in my first band as a matter of necessity.<span>  </span>We were in high school, had been “booked” for our first big performance – playing a school dance – and were rehearsing desperately when we got the news that our singer Craig, a popular and handsome guy who also happened to be the student body president, had mono.<span>  </span>Craving the attention that the gig would bring us (and, let’s be honest, it was mainly about attention and girls), we vowed that the show must go on.<span>  </span>But none of us could sing.<span>  </span>I gamely stepped forward and offered to do it.<span>  </span>I was a distant Plan B from Craig on almost every dimension, but more than anywhere else in the charisma department.<span>  </span>I had a deep-seated, paralyzing fear of public speaking.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">By the time I was 22, I was standing on stage bantering with audiences with the best of them, 10 or 20 times a month.<span>  </span>I had discovered a few techniques, some well-known and some unorthodox, that made my lack of charisma less damaging – and maybe even a strength.<span>  </span>Years later, after being told by a corporate executive coach that I was “a good speaker for a short person,” I realized that performing had taught me those secrets and turned a liability into a strength.<span>  </span>Here they are:</p>
<ol>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Content      is king.</strong><span>  </span>It is kind of depressing      that this is not always obvious, but if you don’t have a good message that      is relevant to your audience, it doesn’t really matter how it’s      presented.<span>  </span>And if a band has      terrible songs that aren’t memorable, it really won’t matter how well it      plays them.<span>  </span>(This assumes that you      are neither a virtuoso guitarist like Joe Satriani nor a brilliant showman      like Robin Williams; at the extremes, somebody can be so good technically      that audiences are astounded and their content isn’t important, but it’s      very rare and has little lasting impact.)</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Practice      until it’s automatic.</strong><span><strong> </strong> </span>If you are      singing a song and you don’t know all the words, you will waste valuable      mental cycles trying to remember them.<span>       </span>Like pretty much any multitasking, this will result in both      activities (singing and remembering) being distracted and      half-hearted.<span>  </span>If you are speaking      about a subject, there is no substitute for knowing the content cold.<span>  </span>If there is some element of the subject      that has you a little confused or turned around, take the time in advance      to understand it and be able to explain it without notes.<span>  </span>If you don’t know the topic that well,      maybe you shouldn’t be speaking about it in public.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Don’t      fake anything.</strong><span>  </span>Maybe you’re an      actor and can be completely convincing as a boisterous, Tom Peters-style      showman, but you’re really a shy geeky type on the inside.<span>  </span>But most likely, assuming a fake      personality will just give you one more thing to think about other than      communicating with your audience.<span>       </span>It’s not worth it.<span>  </span>When I      first started singing, I thought I had to be rock-star cool, and act like      the guys I saw on MTV.<span>  </span>David Lee      Roth would be doing cartwheels and backflips… the least I could do was a      little “Hello, Cleveland!”,      right?<span>  </span>Wrong.<span>  </span>Acting like you’re playing a stadium      when you’re really at a frat party is disingenuous and off-putting.<span>  </span>Lose the attitude and be who you are.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>Stay      in the pocket.</strong><span>  </span>The thrill of live      performance, either at a concert or an important presentation, is enough      to make your heart race.<span>  </span>But your      material has a natural pace and tempo of its own, and you ignore it at      your own peril.<span>  </span>People go too fast      for a variety of reasons – sometimes involuntarily, or other times to give      the illusion of power or forcefulness.<span>       </span>Either way, playing or talking at the <em>right</em> speed will work better than going too fast.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong>They      don’t want you to suck (or, it’s not you, it’s them).</strong><span>  </span>You might think that because you’re at      the front of the room and have a microphone, you’re the most important      part of the experience.<span>  </span>Not      true.<span>  </span>People are basically      self-centered – <strong><em>they</em></strong> are the most important      part of the experience for themselves.<span>       </span>If you’re a little insecure or nervous, this is actually a      wonderful thing.<span>  </span>They don’t need to      hear the most brilliant song or sales pitch to have a good time; they just      need it to be good enough that it doesn’t distract them from their own      internal cues.<span>  </span>A guy who goes to      see a concert with a beautiful woman he’s in love with is going to have a      better time than one who just got dumped, unless the band is so      egregiously awful that it intrudes upon his inner monologue.<span>  </span>A potential client will be excited about      your sales pitch to the extent that your analysis of her problem and      potential solution agrees with her own.<span>       </span>You need to know as much about the audience’s situation as possible      so you can connect your message with their needs.</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you have good content that you know inside and out, you approach it honestly, you keep a sensible pace for the material at hand, and you know what the audience would think a successful presentation would feel like – usually, by the way, it will feel <em>brief</em> – then it’s pretty hard to give a bad presentation.<span>  </span>Even if you’re short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/eintkabilfr-5-ways-to-accidentally-become-better-at-public-speaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why be a creativiste?</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/why-be-a-creativiste/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/why-be-a-creativiste/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[benefits of creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniqueness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/why-be-a-creativiste/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By now, you get the gist of where we’re headed here:  creativity is not just for performers, artists, or advertising agencies.  You may be in a “dull” white-collar job, but thinking new thoughts and trying new actions is still possible. But I’m not simply making the claim that your work can be creative.  I’m saying [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">By now, you get the gist of where we’re headed here:<span>  </span>creativity is not just for performers, artists, or advertising agencies.<span>  </span>You may be in a “dull” white-collar job, but thinking new thoughts and trying new actions is still possible.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But I’m not simply making the claim that your work <em>can</em> be creative.<span>  </span>I’m saying that it necessarily <em>has to be</em> if it is to be successful.<span>  </span>Here in the US, there has been a <a href="http://http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/12/Displaced-workers-need-more-benefits_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/12/Displaced-workers-need-more-benefits_1.html" target="_blank">constant</a> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-pasadena11may11,1,7515978.story?coll=la-headlines-business&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true" target="_blank">drumbeat</a> <a href="http://www.nbc17.com/midatlantic/ncn/news.apx.-content-articles-NCN-2007-06-10-0001.html">of</a> <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/12/Displaced-workers-need-more-benefits_1.html" target="_blank">reports</a> detailing the shifts in offshoring from blue-collar to white-collar industries.<span>  </span>In almost every field – even <a href="http://www.bumrungrad.com/Overseas-Medical-Care/Bumrungrad-International.aspx" target="_blank"><u>medical care</u></a> – highly specialized providers have emerged to compete with the established “best of breed” companies and individuals using major cost advantages.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The end result, whether you live in Boston, Berlin, Bangalore, or Bangkok, is that you face competition that can pretty much do what you do, but more cheaply.<span>  </span>There is only so far that costs can be reduced; therefore, to resist this dynamic you need to create a difference between “what you do” and “what they do”.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In short, <em>what you know</em> won&#8217;t save you.  But maybe <em>how you think</em> will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/why-be-a-creativiste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intro: crunching numbers vs. crunching riffs</title>
		<link>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/intro-crunching-numbers-vs-crunching-riffs/</link>
					<comments>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/intro-crunching-numbers-vs-crunching-riffs/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/intro-crunching-numbers-vs-crunching-riffs/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, I had a job for which I traveled a bit doing recruiting. On one recruiting trip, I was sitting at dinner with my colleagues in a restaurant near my alma mater, where we were searching for new recruits, and a young woman came to our table. &#8220;Excuse me, is your name [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, I had a job for which I traveled a bit doing recruiting.  On one recruiting trip, I was sitting at dinner with my colleagues in a restaurant near my alma mater, where we were searching for new recruits, and a young woman came to our table.</p>
<p>&#8220;Excuse me, is your name Paul?&#8221; she asked shyly.  I replied that yes, it was.<br />
&#8220;Are you in ‘otis wants bread&#8217;?&#8221; she asked.<br />
&#8220;I was, but we&#8217;re not around anymore,&#8221; I told her.<br />
&#8220;Well, that&#8217;s too bad.  I love your CD &#8211; I still play it in my car all the time!&#8221; she said.<br />
&#8220;Thanks, I appreciate it,&#8221; I responded with a blush.</p>
<p>As she left, my stunned co-workers stared for a minute, and then began to interrogate me.  They hadn&#8217;t known that I had been a musician, or at least a musician successful enough to have people recognize me in restaurants.*</p>
<p>They asked a few questions, I told a few road stories, and so on.  Then, finally, the last question was:</p>
<p>&#8220;So, uh, why are you doing <em>this</em>?&#8221;  By which he meant, why are you working for a credit card company crunching data when you could be a rock star living the high life, or at least the interesting life?</p>
<p>I was stumped.  I&#8217;m sure I came up with an answer that had something to do with the relative incomes and working conditions of the two professions.  We moved on to talk about different things, and the moment was gone.</p>
<p>But two things always stuck with me about that conversation.  First, my co-workers clearly felt that they were doing what they were doing because they &#8220;had&#8221; to; since they didn&#8217;t have the miraculous gift of creativity, went the reasoning, they needed to find dull office-type jobs in finance and human resources where they could do well.  And second, they could not believe that somebody like me, who apparently was blessed with the gift, would choose to work where they did for a living.</p>
<p><span id="more-7"></span>As I write this post, I am lying on a couch with my knee swelled to the size of a watermelon.  Earlier today, I had an arthroscopy to remove some cartilage damaged from a long and unfortunate habit that I&#8217;ve had of playing soccer and getting injured while doing it.  I am by no means a good player, and most charitable descriptions of my play would include words like &#8220;workmanlike&#8221; and &#8220;hustle&#8221;.  But I enjoy the game and have had the occasional high point in the 25 years that I&#8217;ve played; a great goal, a great save, a run and pass that threads a needle and catches a defense unaware.  Those best moments always have the characteristics normally associated with &#8220;flow&#8221;, or &#8220;being in the zone&#8221;.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)" title="Flow" target="_blank">Better writers than I</a> have talked about the importance of such peak experiences and how they relate to creativity.</p>
<p>I bring it up to illustrate two things.  First, creativity exists in every field.  Like Howard Gardner&#8217;s theory of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_intelligences" title="Multiple Intelligences">multiple intelligences</a>, I believe there are multiple ways to be creative.  In fact, the two concepts are closely related; having an innate sense for how to do something (like kick a soccer ball, solve a math problem, sell an idea, or play a guitar) gives you a leg up when it comes to bending the rules to adapt to a particular situation.</p>
<p>And second, doing something creative is enjoyable and liberating, no matter what field it is in.  My dinner companions had expressed surprise that I had given up life as a musician to become a risk modeler; to them, playing guitar and singing in a rock band was an innately preferable experience to crunching numbers.  This might be true; but they didn&#8217;t see the miles of driving, the empty clubs and wasted booking agents, the endless rehearsals, the terrible bar gigs with people yelling &#8220;FREE BIRD!&#8221; that go into a reasonably successful music career.  Nor did they see the less dramatic moments of success getting a mathematical model to work by tweaking a variable in a new way, or giving a presentation to the CEO and hitting it out of the park, that made my new job creative.  I simply didn&#8217;t see being a statistical modeler as &#8220;less creative&#8221; than fronting a rock band.</p>
<p>This blog is about achieving those moments and integrating them into the working world.  Check out the manifesto.  Share your opinion.  Maybe creativity can be learned; maybe it can&#8217;t be.  But it is certainly not the sole province of art-school graduates, or teenaged entrepreneurs, or Hollywood writers.  Or of guitar players in second-rate college rock bands.  And it&#8217;s a good thing; if you&#8217;re not creative on the job, you&#8217;re dispensable.  So you need to either get creative &#8211; fast &#8211; or start taking those guitar lessons for your next career.</p>
<p><em>*  Truth be told, this probably happened to me two or three times in my whole life.  But it wasn&#8217;t important for my co-workers to know that!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://creativiste.wordpress.com/2007/06/15/intro-crunching-numbers-vs-crunching-riffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ed18c5f36c259969f8cd7c1d269bd02ad97b88a1eb46ec62d1307168813ef4f0?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">phashemi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
