Let’s clear it up a bit.

Aggravated DUI is a felony. It’s not just about how high your BAC was. It’s usually filed when there are more serious factors, like driving on a suspended license, having multiple prior DUIs, or having a child in the car.

Extreme DUI and Super Extreme DUI are misdemeanors, but don’t be fooled—these can still carry serious penalties. For example, a Super Extreme DUI with a prior can lead to up to 180 days in jail depending on the court and prosecutor.

What really matters is your history. Your prior convictions can actually matter more than the charge itself when it comes to jail time and long-term consequences. That’s why you should never try to figure this out alone. Every case is different, and the best thing you can do is talk to a lawyer who can explain your specific situation clearly.

We offer a free consultation at Alcock & Associates. Let us walk you through it before you make any decisions.

Here’s a simple breakdown to help you get a sense of how Arizona handles DUI charges.

Don’t panic. Call us first. We’re here to help.

The post Understanding DUI Charges in Arizona: Aggravated, Extreme, and Super Extreme Explained appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

Let’s talk about something that doesn’t get enough attention: how a misdemeanor—yes, even a small one—can interfere with your citizenship plans if you’re a green card holder.

You might think, “It was just a DUI,” or “That happened years ago.” But when it comes to applying for U.S. citizenship, the government doesn’t always see it that way.

Misdemeanors and “Good Moral Character”

When you apply for naturalization, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) looks at your behavior over the last three to five years, depending on your case. This is called the “statutory period.” During this time, they expect you to demonstrate “good moral character” (GMC).

But here’s the kicker: even if your misdemeanor happened before that period, it can still raise red flags. For example, if you had a DUI with a high blood alcohol content or were driving recklessly, USCIS might argue that you posed a real danger to others on the road. That can seriously hurt your case.

It’s Not Just the Crime—It’s the Pattern

USCIS doesn’t just look at the offense; they consider the whole picture. If you’ve had multiple run-ins with the law or if your behavior suggests a pattern of poor judgment, that can be a problem. Even if you’ve cleaned up your act, they might still question whether you’ve truly turned things around.

Probation and Parole

If you’re on probation or parole, USCIS won’t approve your application. You must wait until you’ve completed your sentence. But even after that, they’ll scrutinize your behavior during the statutory period to see if you’ve maintained good moral character.

Honesty Is Crucial

One of the worst things you can do is hide your criminal history. USCIS conducts thorough background checks, and if they discover that you lied or omitted information, that’s grounds for denial. Always be upfront about your past.

What You Can Do

If you have a misdemeanor on your record—especially one involving alcohol or drugs—it’s essential to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for citizenship. They can help you understand how your specific situation might affect your application and advise you on the best course of action.

Remember, every case is unique. Don’t assume that a minor offense won’t matter. It’s better to be safe and get professional advice than to risk a denial.

Stay informed and take the necessary steps to protect your path to citizenship.

Nick Alcock
Alcock & Associates

The post How a Misdemeanor Could Jeopardize Your Citizenship Application appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

Understanding Changes to Immigration Bonds Under the Laken Riley Act

English Version:

Recent changes in U.S. immigration law have significantly impacted how bonds are granted in immigration proceedings. The Laken Riley Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by the President, has introduced stricter criteria for bond eligibility. This law is raising concerns about which offenses may disqualify individuals from obtaining a bond.

Under the Laken Riley Act, questions have emerged regarding whether lower-level offenses, such as shoplifting or non-injurious assaults, will make individuals ineligible for bond. These offenses, while typically not severe, may now carry heavier consequences for immigrants in removal proceedings. Immigration enforcement is anticipated to increase, and this heightened activity will likely result in a surge of cases being brought before immigration courts.

Historically, immigration courts have shown varying degrees of conservatism in bond determinations, often influenced by the discretion of the presiding judges. With the passage of this act, many fear that courts will become more restrictive in allowing bond releases for individuals awaiting their removal hearings. This underscores the critical need for experienced legal representation during this process.

At our firm, we recently achieved a bond for a client whose eligibility was questioned under the Lake and Riley Act. This success highlights the importance of having a highly skilled immigration attorney advocating on your behalf. As laws evolve and new interpretations arise, our legal team stays at the forefront, monitoring how courts handle these changes. We are prepared to challenge any adverse rulings through the appeals process.

If you or a loved one are facing removal proceedings and need guidance on bond eligibility, we are here to help. Our firm offers free consultations for all immigration cases. Call us at 602-989-5000 to schedule an appointment. We have offices serving Northern Virginia, Washington D.C., Minnesota, and Arizona, including Tucson.

Entendiendo los Cambios en los Bonos de Inmigración bajo la Ley Laken Riley

Versión en Español:

Recientes cambios en la legislación de inmigración en los Estados Unidos han afectado significativamente cómo se otorgan los bonos en los procesos migratorios. La Ley Laken Riley, aprobada por el Congreso y firmada por el Presidente, ha introducido criterios más estrictos para la elegibilidad de los bonos. Esta ley está generando preocupaciones sobre qué tipos de delitos podrían descalificar a las personas para obtener un bono.

Con esta nueva ley, han surgido preguntas acerca de si delitos menores, como el hurto o agresiones sin lesiones, podrían hacer que una persona sea inelegible para un bono. Estos delitos, aunque generalmente no se consideran graves, ahora podrían tener consecuencias más serias para los inmigrantes en procesos de deportación. Se anticipa un aumento en la aplicación de las leyes de inmigración, lo que probablemente llevará a un incremento de casos en los tribunales migratorios.

Históricamente, los tribunales de inmigración han mostrado diferentes grados de conservadurismo en sus decisiones sobre bonos, influenciados por la discreción de los jueces. Con la implementación de esta ley, muchos temen que los tribunales se vuelvan más restrictivos al permitir la liberación de personas en espera de sus audiencias de deportación. Esto resalta la necesidad crítica de contar con una representación legal experimentada durante este proceso.

En nuestra firma, recientemente logramos obtener un bono para un cliente cuya elegibilidad estaba en duda bajo la Ley Laken Riley. Este éxito demuestra la importancia de tener un abogado de inmigración altamente calificado que abogue por sus derechos. A medida que las leyes evolucionan y surgen nuevas interpretaciones, nuestro equipo legal se mantiene a la vanguardia, observando cómo los tribunales manejan estos cambios. Estamos preparados para apelar cualquier decisión adversa en nombre de nuestros clientes.

Si usted o un ser querido está enfrentando un proceso de deportación y necesita asesoría sobre la elegibilidad para un bono, estamos aquí para ayudarle. Ofrecemos consultas gratuitas para todos los casos de inmigración. Llámenos al 602-989-5000 para programar una cita. Contamos con oficinas que sirven a Virginia del Norte, Washington D.C., Minnesota y Arizona, incluyendo Tucson.

The post Changes to Immigration bonds under the laken riley act appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

Watch our video featuring Tempe Criminal Defense Attorney Nick Alcock, where he discusses strategies for defending criminal cases in Tempe, Arizona. Learn about his experience and commitment to achieving the best outcomes for his clients. Click to view and learn more!

The post Tempe Criminal Defense Attorney: 602-989-5000 appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

If you’re being pressured—if someone is really pushing you to sign, pen in hand, and rushing you to commit—you should probably walk away. You’ve already been injured, you’re struggling, and maybe you’ve even lost your car. The last thing you need is an attorney who’s putting a lot of pressure on you to sign. Take your time, and here’s why:

1. Take Your Time Before Signing

In the contract or fee agreement they want you to sign, there’s likely some fine print. Unfortunately, some lawyers include clauses that might not work in your favor. For example, the agreement may state that you’re responsible for costs, filing fees, and other charges. The standard fee might be 33%, but if your case goes to court, that percentage could increase to 40%, and suddenly you might find yourself responsible for as much as 50% of your recovery. Be sure to carefully read and understand exactly what the lawyer is taking from your recovery before you sign. This step is absolutely crucial.

2. Watch for Directing You to Specific Doctors

After you sign, if the attorney starts directing you to see a particular doctor—or if a doctor is strongly recommending a specific attorney—you should see a red flag. These relationships can indicate that the attorney and doctor have a financial connection, which is rarely in the client’s best interest. In my experience, these arrangements seldom work out well for the injured party.

Keep these tips in mind when choosing a personal injury attorney. There are plenty of options out there, so take your time and find someone who truly has your best interests at heart. Drive safely, and take care. Thank you!

If you’ve been hurt in an accident, you don’t have to face this alone. At Alcock and Associates, we’re here to help you every step of the way. Our experienced personal injury attorneys will fight to get you the compensation you deserve while ensuring your rights are protected. Call us today at 602-989-5000 for a free, no-pressure consultation. Let us take the burden off your shoulders so you can focus on healing.

The post 3 Tips for Hiring the Best Injury Attorney appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

In Arizona, DUI on cold medicine is a serious matter. Many people assume DUIs only involve alcohol, but Arizona law applies to any substance—legal or illegal—that impairs your ability to drive safely. This includes over-the-counter medications, prescription drugs, and other substances. Learn how DUI laws in Arizona may impact drivers taking legal medications.

Understanding DUI Laws in Arizona: Beyond Alcohol

Arizona defines DUI as operating a vehicle while impaired to the slightest degree. Even if your blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is below 0.08%, you can be charged if you’re deemed unable to drive safely. This applies to cold medicines and prescription drugs that impair motor skills or judgment.

How Cold Medicines Like NyQuil Can Lead to DUIs

Cold medications like NyQuil and DayQuil can cause drowsiness, dizziness, or delayed reactions. Allergy medications such as Claritin, Allegra, or Benadryl can also reduce alertness. These effects can impair your ability to focus and respond quickly in traffic, potentially leading to a DUI on cold medicine in Arizona.

Prescription Drugs and DUI in Arizona

Prescription drugs pose additional risks. Anti-anxiety medications like Valium or Xanax and opioids such as oxycodone can impair coordination and slow reflexes, even when taken as prescribed. If these medications affect your driving, you may face DUI charges in Arizona.

Signs of Impairment That Could Result in a DUI

Law enforcement looks for behaviors like swerving, sudden stops, or slow reactions. Officers also observe signs like slurred speech or confusion. If you admit to taking medication or fail a field sobriety test, you could face a DUI charge in Arizona.

Consequences of a DUI on Cold Medicine in Arizona

Penalties for a DUI include fines, court costs, a suspended license, mandatory education programs, and even jail time. These penalties are the same whether impairment is caused by alcohol or a legal medication. Taking cold medicine like NyQuil could have serious consequences.

Protect Yourself When Taking Medication

Always read medication labels and understand their side effects before driving. If a drug impairs your focus, reaction time, or motor skills, consider alternative transportation. Protect yourself and others by avoiding impaired driving.

Seek Legal Help If You’re Charged

If you’re charged with a DUI on cold medicine in Arizona, seek legal advice immediately. A qualified attorney can help you navigate the legal process and protect your rights.

The post Can You Get a DUI for Driving on Cold Medicine in Arizona? appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

Here are four DUI IN Phoenix, AZ questions our clients ask.

1. What constitutes a DUI offense in Arizona?

In Arizona, a person can be charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) if they operate a vehicle with a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher. However, drivers can also face DUI charges with a BAC below 0.08% if impaired to the slightest degree. Commercial drivers have a lower BAC threshold of 0.04%, and for drivers under 21, any detectable alcohol can lead to DUI charges. Additionally, driving under the influence of drugs, including prescription medications that impair driving ability, can result in a DUI charge.

2. What are the penalties for a first-time DUI offense in Arizona?

A first-time misdemeanor DUI offense in Arizona carries severe penalties, including:

Jail Time: A minimum of 10 consecutive days, with the possibility of reducing 9 days upon completion of court-ordered alcohol screening and education.
Fines and Assessments: Base fines totaling more than $1,500, plus additional court costs.
License Suspension: A 30-day suspension followed by a 60-day restricted driving period.
Ignition Interlock Device: Mandatory installation of a certified ignition interlock device for one year.
Additional Penalties: Possible community service and mandatory alcohol education or treatment programs.
These penalties can escalate with higher BAC levels, prior offenses, or aggravating factors such as having a minor in the vehicle.

3. Can I refuse a breathalyzer or field sobriety test during a DUI stop in Arizona?

In Arizona, drivers have the right to refuse field sobriety tests without immediate legal penalties. However, under the state’s implied consent law, refusing a breath, blood, or urine test after a DUI arrest can result in a one-year license suspension, regardless of the outcome of the DUI charge. Law enforcement officers may also obtain a warrant to conduct the test if you refuse. Therefore, while you can refuse these tests, doing so carries significant consequences.

4. What are the long-term consequences of a DUI conviction in Arizona?

A DUI conviction in Arizona can have lasting impacts, including:

Criminal Record: A DUI remains on your criminal record, potentially affecting employment opportunities and professional licensing.
Increased Insurance Rates: Auto insurance premiums can rise significantly, and some insurers may refuse coverage.
Travel Restrictions: Certain countries may deny entry to individuals with DUI convictions.
Personal and Professional Impact: A DUI conviction can lead to social stigma and strain personal relationships.
Given these severe consequences, it’s crucial to consult with an experienced DUI attorney to navigate the legal process and mitigate potential penalties.

For personalized legal assistance, contact the Law Offices of Alcock and Associates, P.C., at 602-404-6000. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to providing comprehensive support tailored to your specific situation.

The post Top Four Questions About DUI in Phoenix appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

General Arizona Divorce Statistics and Trends

Divorce, legally referred to as the dissolution of marriage, is a significant event that affects individuals, families, and communities. In Arizona, the divorce rate has seen fluctuations over the years, influenced by economic, social, and cultural factors.

Marriage and Divorce Rate: What percentage of marriages end in divorce?

• According to the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Arizona’s divorce rate statistics has hovered around 2.7 per 1,000 residents.
• Arizona places Arizona slightly above the national average in divorce rate by state, which was approximately 2.5 per 1,000.
• The marriage rate in Arizona is 5.4 per 1,000 residents. This indicates that while marriage remains popular, the percentage of divorce rate is notable. 

Impact of Arizona Divorce Statistics on Family Dynamics

Arizona Divorce Rate vs Other States

Top 5 States with the Highest Divorce Rates *per 1000 residents

I think about that judge all the time. I owe a debt to that court for teaching me the value of precision. My first appearances in front of the court were very stressful. My first case was a case that I took on for free. It was a homeless vet who came into my office after being levied a large fine for not appearing in court when he was supposed to earlier in the month. I walked back into the court and recalled his case. After thirty minutes of back and forth or so we walked out with his fine zeroed out.

Top 5 States with the Lowest Divorce Rates *per 1000 residents

Urban vs. Rural Divorce Rate Statistics in Arizona

Divorce rate by state can vary significantly across different regions. In Arizona, urban areas such as Phoenix and Tucson tend to have higher current divorce rates compared to rural regions.

Couples living in urbanized areas have a 23% higher divorce rate percentage. Maricopa county has a 2.9 divorce rate per 1000 residents.

This higher rate can be attributed to various factors commonly associated with urban living, such as higher stress levels due to fast-paced lifestyles, increased financial pressures, and a greater prevalence of work-life balance challenges.

In contrast, rural counties like Apache and Navajo have lower percentage of divorce rates, at around 1.3 and 2.2 per 1,000 residents respectively.

Arizona Divorce Statistics and Trends: Key Data and Insights *data is per 1000 residents

Demographic Trends and Arizona Divorce Statistics: Key Factors to Consider

• The median age at first divorce in Arizona is 43 for men and 40 for women, which aligns closely with national trends. Notably, younger couples aged 25-34 represent a significant portion of divorces. This age group often faces unique challenges such as financial instability, career pressures, and the early stages of family life, which can contribute to marital strain. 
• Around 61% of divorcing couples have children under the age of 18. The Arizona legal system emphasizes the best interests of the child, ensuring that custody decisions support the child’s health, safety, and emotional well-being.
• In Arizona, as in the rest of the country, individuals with higher education levels tend to have lower divorce rate percentage. They are 30% less likely to divorce compared to those with only a high school diploma.

Common Causes of Divorce in Arizona Statistics

Understanding the common causes of divorce can provide insights into the dynamics of marital relationships. In Arizona, the primary causes of divorce include:

1. Communication Problems

Poor communication is cited as the leading cause of divorce, affecting over 67.5% of divorcing couples. Communication breakdowns can lead to misunderstandings, unresolved conflicts, and a growing emotional distance between partners

2. Infidelity

Infidelity is a significant factor, contributing to approximately 22% of divorces. Acts of betrayal, whether emotional or physical, can severely damage trust and intimacy in a marriage.

3. Financial Issues

Financial stress and disagreements over money account for around 55% of divorces according to couples. Unemployment is linked to higher divorce rates. Couples with lower income levels are also more likely to divorce.

4. Domestic Violence

Approximately 23.5% of divorces cite domestic violence as a contributing factor. Domestic violence, which includes physical, emotional, and psychological abuse, poses severe risks to the safety and well-being of individuals in a marriage. 

Trends and Statistics on The Impact of Divorce on Children

Divorce and child custody arrangements can have profound effects on families, particularly children. 

Research indicates that children of divorced parents may experience: 

1. Increased Risk of Mental Health Issues

Studies indicate that children of divorced parents are at a higher risk of developing anxiety, depression, and other mental health disorders. The American Academy of Pediatrics reports that these children are twice as likely to seek mental health counseling compared to their peers from intact families.

2.Behavioral Problems

Behavioral issues, including increased aggression and non-compliance, are more prevalent among children of divorced parents. They are six times more likely to engage in risky behaviors during adolescence. These issues often manifest in school settings, where teachers observe increased classroom disruptions and lower academic performance.

3. Lower Academic Achievement

Research shows that children of divorced parents typically perform worse academically, with lower grades and higher dropout rates. Moreover, financial difficulties and the need to contribute to household income often deter these children from seeking higher education.

Legal Aspects of Divorce in Arizona

Divorce laws and proceedings vary by state. In Arizona, the following legal aspects are essential:

1. Arizona is a no-fault divorce state, meaning couples can file for divorce without proving wrongdoing. The most common ground is the “irretrievable breakdown” of the marriage.
2. The introduction of no-fault divorce laws has led to an increase in divorce rates. However, it has contributed to a significant decrease in intimate partner violence by up to 30%.
3. Before filing for divorce in Arizona, one spouse must have lived in the state for at least 90 days. This residency requirement ensures that the state’s courts have jurisdiction over the divorce proceedings. It also prevents “divorce tourism.’
4. Arizona follows community property laws, which ensure a 50/50 split of marital property, unless there is a prenuptial agreement or other legal documentation stating otherwise.
5. Arizona courts prioritize the best interests of the child when determining custody arrangements. Joint custody is awarded in majority of cases, promoting shared parenting responsibilities.
6. Alimony or spousal maintenance may be awarded based on factors like the length of the marriage, the standard of living, and each spouse’s earning capacity. In Arizona, reasonable spousal maintenance payments typically range from 15% to 30% of the paying spouse’s pre-divorce income.
7. Arizona is a no-fault state which means couples may file a divorce without hiring a divorce lawyer. 79% of couples however, hire attorneys to help them with their divorce proceedings and more than 70% are extremely or moderately satisfied with the results.

For more information about divorce in Arizona, you can contact the award-winning attorneys at Alcock & Associates at 602-989-5000 or schedule a consultation.

The post Divorce Statistics in Arizona: Trends, Facts, and Current Rates appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

The recent rejection of the Bipartisan Border Security Bill by the Senate strikes a chord that resonates far beyond the confines of Capitol Hill. It emphasizes the impact of legislative maneuvers and partisan divides in shaping the future of immigration in the United States.

Key Changes Proposed in the New Immigration Bill

At the heart of the matter is a comprehensive immigration reform bill touted as the most significant overhaul of border policy in decades. With a staggering $118 billion package that includes military aid to Ukraine and Israel, the bill aimed to tackle the surge in illegal crossings at the US-Mexican border and overhaul an asylum system stretched to its limits by a wave of migrants seeking refuge.

The proposed changes were extensive, spanning both border security measures and reforms to the asylum and immigration laws. A central provision of the bill was allocating $20 billion to enhance and expand border security operations. This funding was intended to address the record highs in arrests for illegal crossings and provide resources to reduce the flow of migrants attempting to enter the country unlawfully.

The Senate Border Security Bill also included measures to tighten the asylum system, introducing a new emergency authority that would allow the Department of Homeland Security to “shut down” the border in response to excessive migrant crossings.

Additionally, the bill would end the practice of “catch and release” and mandate the detention of migrants attempting to enter the US outside of official ports of entry, pending asylum claims. It also proposed new measures to facilitate the hiring of border patrol agents, asylum officers, and other personnel within key immigration agencies to address staffing shortages, enhance operational capacity, and effectively implement the Border Security Act.

Senate Rejects Border Security Bill

Despite bipartisan efforts and its potential benefits, the Border Security Bill faced significant opposition in the Senate that ultimately led to its failure. Senate Republicans and Democrats clashed over various aspects of the bill, including the allocation of funds and the balance between national security and humanitarian concerns.

Critics of the immigration reform bill voiced concerns over the potential militarization of the border and the impact on vulnerable migrant populations, arguing for a more humane approach to immigration policy. There were also questions regarding the effectiveness of the proposed border control and security measures.

Humanitarian Concerns

One critical aspect that demands attention in immigration reform efforts is the protection of human rights and dignity. The surge in migrant arrivals at the southern border has highlighted the plight of vulnerable populations, including women, children, and asylum seekers fleeing persecution.

It is essential for policymakers to prioritize humanitarian considerations in crafting immigration policies and ensure that immigrants’ rights and their well-being are upheld throughout the process. This includes providing access to fair and efficient asylum procedures, safeguarding against the exploitation and abuse of migrants, and promoting integration and social inclusion for those granted legal status.

Building Consensus

Meaningful immigration reform requires building consensus among stakeholders with diverse interests and perspectives. While differences in opinion are expected, negotiation and compromise are essential to making progress on this complex issue.

The need for stronger bipartisan cooperation and thoughtful policymaking in immigration reform has never been more pressing. Policymakers should engage with experts, advocates, affected communities, and bipartisan allies to develop comprehensive and pragmatic solutions that address the multifaceted challenges of immigration. By seeking common ground and prioritizing the national interest, lawmakers can overcome partisan gridlock and enact reforms that benefit both the country and its immigrant population.

The Future of Immigration Reform

The rejection of the Senate Border Security Bill serves as a stark reminder of the divisions that continue to plague our nation’s immigration discourse. Moving forward, it remains to be seen how lawmakers will address immigration policy issues amidst the ongoing border crossings crises and the urgent need for comprehensive reform. Collaboration, negotiation, and dialogue between stakeholders will be essential in crafting effective and equitable solutions that uphold America’s values and aspirations as a nation of immigrants.

If you or someone you know is facing immigration challenges or seeking guidance on navigating the complexities of the system, don’t hesitate to reach out. Our team of experienced immigration attorneys is here to provide support, guidance, and advocacy every step of the way. Together, let’s work towards achieving your immigration goals and securing a brighter future.

Contact us today to inquire about how we can assist with your immigration case.

The post Immigration Policy in Focus: Analyzing the Senate Border Security Bill appeared first on Alcock & Associates.

In an era of Zoom meetings and Google, this concept seems incredibly antiquated. However, in many ways I consider myself very fortunate to have gone to law school in the pre internet era. “Back in the day,” so to speak, a lawyer would have to run down to the law library with a bag of coins for the copy machine to research case law. Nowadays, a lawyer can get a legal case law question answered in microseconds using a natural language search. In the 1990s, however, an aspiring lawyer would have to read through case after case until they would find what they were looking for. I’m happy that I am a product of that era.

And that’s why it seemed like it wasn’t such a wild idea to rent a little office and hang my shingle. I had no web site and perhaps I owned two suits. I went to a sign company and hung my little sign above my office door which was located across the hallway from a local justice court. That court has long since been shuttered and the entire legal system in Arizona has been modernized and changed. But, back then, a lawyer with a dream and enough money to rent a little office could start out and see what happens.

The office I rented had been vacant for quite some time. The local justice of the peace was known as a very stern judge. It was a court that many attorneys avoided. It was not uncommon for lawyers to find themselves being punished for relatively minor infractions that most other judges wouldn’t even notice. As such, this little office was a great deal.

My office had previously been a probation department location and it smelled horribly of cigarettes. Fortunately I moved in during a spell of good weather and I propped the door open to get some fresh air moving around. Soon enough, people who had some negative outcomes in front of the justice of the peace started to come into my office looking for legal advice. And the rest is history.

I think about that judge all the time. I owe a debt to that court for teaching me the value of precision. My first appearances in front of the court were very stressful. My first case was a case that I took on for free. It was a homeless vet who came into my office after being levied a large fine for not appearing in court when he was supposed to earlier in the month. I walked back into the court and recalled his case. After thirty minutes of back and forth or so we walked out with his fine zeroed out.

The lessons I learned from my little North Phoenix office still apply to this day. We still help hundreds of clients every year for free. We have an open door and never charge for consultations. I also insist that my attorneys and staff respect and precisely follow the local rules of any court that they appear in, even if those rules seem unreasonable or unneeded.

Every once in a while I drive by that old office building and think about the day I hung my shingle. I’ve learned so much since I first started. However, I’ll always fondly remember those first few months there with my door open waiting to see who would walk in.

The post How My Law Firm Started appeared first on Alcock & Associates.