New Crystal Mind

The User Illusion

Simeon — Thu, 24 May 2012 17:11:12 +0000

Hey, here’s the excellent book, The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size by Tor Norrestranders that I mentioned in my previous post. All I have to say it, READ THIS BOOK. It offers a lot of insight into how your mind really works.

Where is Your Subconscious Mind? (surprise!)

Simeon — Thu, 17 May 2012 14:28:52 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biJgUFg-mFo

If you like this sort of thing, you may also enjoy VirtualViewing.org

Over 600K Views on YouTube

Simeon — Mon, 14 May 2012 01:35:32 +0000

Hey, thanks for all your interest in New Crystal Mind and all my videos on YouTube. We just went over 600,000 views! When I posted my first video there in 2008, I never imagined there would be this much interest in remote viewing, human intuition, creativity, neuroscience, crop circles, and new energy technologies. Thanks again everyone and keep watching. More fascinating and helpful information is coming your way.

Remote Viewers Help Investigators Solve California Case

Simeon — Mon, 07 May 2012 03:53:53 +0000

Angela Thompson Smith

A team of remote viewers led by Angela Thompson Smith correctly provided California police with the location of a missing person and the location of the lead suspect, who has since been convicted of his death. Way to go remote viewers!

Remote Viewers Help Solve California Missing Person’s Case

Test Pilots Wanted!

Simeon — Tue, 01 May 2012 21:33:43 +0000

Hey, I’ve just finished working on my Virtual Viewing Insight class. You know: It’s all about activating your subtle perceptions and hyper intuitive abilities to get better results and make better decisions. It’s like tapping into your “super mind” as I call it.

And it can really do wonders for your natural creativity.

If you would like to help me test it click here. It would really help me out a lot to get your comments. It takes about a week to go through. Thanks!

What Are They Afraid Of? (Gladwell, Lehrer, and a Case of the Scientific Heebie-Jeebies)

Simeon — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:08:31 +0000

I’m a big fan of Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink: the Power of Thinking Without Thinking and the new book by Jonah Lehrer, Imagine: How Creativity Works. Both of the authors bring a lot of new research out about the the innate and mysterious power of our intuition and natural creativity. They reveal the inner workings of our subconscious minds and how some of our best talents are hidden behind the trappings of the conscious mind.

And yet both these works still leave me wondering why they never, ever mention some of the latest research into the less well understood aspects of our minds including the 25-year project by Robert Jahn at PEAR Labs, Princeton University, which shows that human thought can subtly influence machines. Then there is the remote viewing research of Hal Putoff and Russell Targ funded by the federal government at Stanford Research Institute for twenty years beginning in the 1970′s. Or the more recent research by Jonathan Schooler and Michael Franklin at the University of California, Santa Barbara on the possibilities of human “presentience” (having a sense of events in one’s immediate future.) And these three examples only scratch the surface.

This research, and much more like it, from the past century suggest that humans have the ability to perceive so-called “nonlocal” information and possibly interact with it as well. These studies are not entirely conclusive but they support the idea that something is going on in the human mind that is way, way beyond the conventional idea of how it is supposed to work: that our mind is located somewhere in our physical brain which is really just a “three pound piece of meat running on 12 watts of electricity” as Lehrer recently stated in an interview on the Colbert show (April 17th, 2012).

It’s almost like these two authors are living in hermetically sealed test tubes and either are not allowed or refuse to look at the recent evidence that our minds have a nonlocal aspect to them. We’re not talking about mysticism here. This is simply newer scientific evidence that imply that the mechanistic explanations of human intelligence are inadequate at best, or even completely wrong.

So what I’m really wondering is why neither Gladwell or Lehrer ever seriously mention this type of research in their books or interviews? It seems like they are both afraid to talk about it. And the big question is why? Why be afraid to look at scientific evidence? Perhaps in the future they will. Or perhaps not.

First British Crop Circle of 2012, Wiltshire

Simeon — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:04:57 +0000

Wiltshire, U.K. April 2012

Crop Circles and Creativity (and what keeps me going back)

Simeon — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:39:42 +0000

People often ask me why I continue to study crop circles year after year. The truth is, the crop circle phenomenon is one most inspiring and creativity-enhancing subjects I’ve ever come across. The designs are beautiful: some mathematically complex and some simple. But when you perceive them in their natural landscape, it strikes a chord (so to speak) in your awareness. Whether they are manmade or not, doesn’t matter to me: we’ve seen strange effects on our cameras and batteries in, or flying over, our own experimental formations. Yes, the batteries or cameras just stop working or malfunction in inexplicable ways. These patterns continue to push my mind to new places that it ordinarily wouldn’t go. And consider possibilities I hadn’t ever considered before. And that, in itself, is why I keep going back.

Learn more about the crop circle tour this summer with Simeon

Forbidden Science

Simeon — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:09:37 +0000

I’m currently re-reading this excellent book, Forbidden Science, by Richard Milton who looks at the hostility of mainstream, institutionalized science to new inventions and technologies. We’re not talking about anything far out by today’s standards but everything from lightbulbs to airplanes were ridiculed or denounced at one time. The Wright Brothers, Thomas Edison, Nikola Telsa (created alternating current) and the inventors of radio and television were all, at one point or another, considered frauds in their time. To put it simply, almost every modern technology we have around was at one time resisted, suppressed, or banned by mainstream science. The Wright Brothers were considered a hoax by Scientific American magazine up to two years after their public demonstrations of manned flight in Ohio. The book is filled with countless similar examples including the humorous case of the French Academy of Sciences once confiscating all meteorites in France on the grounds that they were an impossibility. And let’s not look at what astonomers and other experts said about the possibility of manned spaceflight, even into the era of the first Saturn V rocket carrying astronauts to the Moon in 1960′s. As Dr. Lee DeForrest, inventor of the vacuum tube is reported to have said of space travel in 1957: “I am bold enough to state that, no matter what the discoveries of the future, it will never happen.” Available here.

What is Hyper Intuition?

Simeon — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:41:25 +0000

Hyper Intuition™ is process whereby a person can, using specific training techniques, gain access to more information, creativity, and insight than is normally available to their physical senses.

It can be thought of as the “sweet spot” between remote viewing at one extreme, and ordinary “gut” feelings or hunches on the other. In this middle area a person can get highly accurate, spontaneous information about a variety of challenges they are facing about their personal or professional life.

This appears to be possible using principles of quantum resonance whereby a person’s body and mind pick up information directly and intuitively rather than through a physical perception process. In our experience with students who have studied the technique, they are able to pick useful information and get a bigger perspective on projects they are working on.

Learn more at MyCreativeIntelligence.com or HyperIntuitionTraining.com.