<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Awareness</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.innertemplelibrary.com</link>
	<description>Legal News selected by the Inner Temple Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29318896</site>	<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2026/06/bailii-recent-decisions-2854/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 724 (09 June 2026) Entry Clearance Officer v Spence [2026] EWCA Civ 722 (09 June 2026) Song &#38; Anor v Smith &#38; Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 719 (09 June 2026) The Courtyard RTM Company Ltd &#38; Ors v [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2026/724.html">DA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 724 (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2026/722.html">Entry Clearance Officer v Spence [2026] EWCA Civ 722 (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2026/719.html">Song &amp; Anor v Smith &amp; Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 719 (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2026/712.html">The Courtyard RTM Company Ltd &amp; Ors v Rockwell (FC103) Ltd &amp; Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 712 (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/709.html">Huzcavitch, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 709 (22 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/708.html">Weston, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 708 (22 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/690.html">Knight, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 690 (20 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/688.html">George, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 688 (19 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/689.html">Hague, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 689 (19 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/692.html">Lindsay, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 692 (15 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/704.html">Brown, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 704 (14 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/691.html">Bhayani, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 691 (14 May 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/693.html">Boyce, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 693 (14 May 2026) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1389.html">Lupsa v Timis Court, Romania [2026] EWHC 1389 (Admin) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1394.html">UCPI Designated Lawyer Officers Core Participant Group, R (On the Application Of) v Mitting [2026] EWHC 1394 (Admin) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1382.html">Secretary of State for Justice, R (On the Application Of) v The Parole Board for England and Wales [2026] EWHC 1382 (Admin) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1373.html">Adefidiya v Nursing And Midwifery Council [2026] EWHC 1373 (Admin) (08 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1363.html">Glenbrook Industrial Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council [2026] EWHC 1363 (Admin) (08 June 2026) </a></p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1414.html">SCUR-Alpha 1092 GmbH, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 1414 (Ch) (10 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1381.html">Latter Rain Outpouring Project Ltd v Green &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1381 (Ch) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1388.html">Lyons v Bridging Finance Inc [2026] EWHC 1388 (Ch) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1368.html">Matyas v Daniel &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1368 (Ch) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1346.html">ICG Manager Ltd &amp; Ors v Colliers International Valuation UK LLP (t/a Colliers International) [2026] EWHC 1346 (Ch) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1293.html">Zavarei v Vaziri &amp; Anor [2026] EWHC 1293 (Ch) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1295.html">Networld Sports Ltd v Quick Play Sport Ltd [2026] EWHC 1295 (Ch) (01 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1231.html">Stevens &amp; Anor v Kyte &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1231 (Ch) (29 May 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Commercial Court)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2026/1390.html">Beech Hill Capital Ltd v Duplan (aka Duplancic) &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1390 (Comm) (10 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2026/1392.html">Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd v Fertitta Entertainment Inc &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1392 (Comm) (09 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2026/1277.html">Cit Group Finance (Ireland) Unlimited Company v Spicejet Ltd [2026] EWHC 1277 (Comm) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Family Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2026/1358.html">AH (A Child) (Jurisdiction: Habitual Residence: Section 2(1)(b)(i) Family Law Act 1986)) [2026] EWHC 1358 (Fam) (08 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2026/1385.html">HG (A Child)(Abduction: Consent, Acquiescence, Art 13b), Re [2026] EWHC 1385 (Fam) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2026/1362.html">C (A Child) (Care Orders, Section 20 Accommodation, And Deprivation of Liberty) [2026] EWHC 1362 (Fam) (05 May 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (King&#8217;s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1413.html">Hossain &amp; Ors v The Home Office [2026] EWHC 1413 (KB) (10 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1403.html">Fuschillo &amp; Ors v Johnson &amp; Johnson &amp; Ors (GLO, AGPOC and other issues) [2026] EWHC 1403 (KB) (10 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1355.html">Wilden v Person Unknown &amp; Anor [2026] EWHC 1355 (KB) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1239.html">Greening-Steer v Ainge [2026] EWHC 1239 (KB) (22 May 2026)</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150649</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs deliver damning verdict on jury trial reforms &#8211; Law Society Gazette</title>
		<link>https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/mps-deliver-damning-verdict-on-jury-trial-reforms/5127013.article</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;An influential group of MPs has delivered a damning verdict on the Courts and Tribunals Bill – telling the government that the magistrates’ court will not be able to cope with the volume of cases generated by curbs on jury trials, sounding the alarm over doubling magistrates&#8217; sentencing powers and questioning the time that judge-only [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;An influential group of MPs has delivered a damning verdict on the Courts and Tribunals Bill – telling the government that the magistrates’ court will not be able to cope with the volume of cases generated by curbs on jury trials, sounding the alarm over doubling magistrates&#8217; sentencing powers and questioning the time that judge-only trials will save.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/mps-deliver-damning-verdict-on-jury-trial-reforms/5127013.article">Full Story</a></p><p>Law Society Gazette, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150648</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>London borough loses High Court bid against police front counter closure &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/community-safety/393-community-safety-news/100744-london-borough-loses-high-court-bid-against-police-front-counter-closure</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The High Court has refused permission for Richmond Council to bring a judicial review claim against the closure of the London borough&#8217;s last remaining walk-in police station front counter.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 10th June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The High Court has refused permission for Richmond Council to bring a judicial review claim against the closure of the London borough&#8217;s last remaining walk-in police station front counter.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/community-safety/393-community-safety-news/100744-london-borough-loses-high-court-bid-against-police-front-counter-closure">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150647</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running a sweepstake at work: the law &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/running-a-sweepstake-at-work-the-law</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Workplace sweepstakes are a popular way to build engagement around sporting and other events. However, many common formats fall within the scope of the Gambling Act 2005 and can be unlawful unless they fit within a specific exemption.&#8217; Full StoryOUT-LAW.com, 9th June 2026Source: www.pinsentmasons.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Workplace sweepstakes are a popular way to build engagement around sporting and other events. However, many common formats fall within the scope of the Gambling Act 2005 and can be unlawful unless they fit within a specific exemption.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/running-a-sweepstake-at-work-the-law">Full Story</a></p><p>OUT-LAW.com, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.pinsentmasons.com">www.pinsentmasons.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150646</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sara Closs-Davies, Dominic de Cogan and Amy Lawton: Devolving Power, Dividing Outcomes – The Social Consequences of UK Fiscal Devolution &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Association</title>
		<link>https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/10/sara-closs-davies-dominic-de-cogan-and-amy-lawton-devolving-power-dividing-outcomes-the-social-consequences-of-uk-fiscal-devolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Fiscal devolution in the United Kingdom (UK) is often examined through a technical lens. Yet some of its most significant implications and impacts are social. Tax devolution was introduced with the implicit promise that fiscal powers would enable governments to serve communities more closely, respond effectively to distinctive social needs, and sustain and strengthen local [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Fiscal devolution in the United Kingdom (UK) is often examined through a technical lens. Yet some of its most significant implications and impacts are social. Tax devolution was introduced with the implicit promise that fiscal powers would enable governments to serve communities more closely, respond effectively to distinctive social needs, and sustain and strengthen local cultures and preferences. However, in practice, and as our work argues, the UK’s fiscal devolution fails to support coherent social outcomes. This is because it is built on constitutional instability and a persistent mismatch between social aspirations and fiscal capacity.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/10/sara-closs-davies-dominic-de-cogan-and-amy-lawton-devolving-power-dividing-outcomes-the-social-consequences-of-uk-fiscal-devolution/">Full Story</a></p><p>UK Constitutional Law Association, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org">ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150644</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New family law service tackles misunderstanding around neurodivergency &#8211; Legal Futures</title>
		<link>https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/new-family-law-service-tackles-misunderstanding-around-neurodivergency</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A team of child protection solicitors have created a new family law service, specialising in support for parents and children with neurodivergent conditions.&#8217; Full StoryLegal Futures, 10th June 2026Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A team of child protection solicitors have created a new family law service, specialising in support for parents and children with neurodivergent conditions.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/new-family-law-service-tackles-misunderstanding-around-neurodivergency">Full Story</a></p><p>Legal Futures, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.legalfutures.co.uk">www.legalfutures.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150643</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mind the Gap: A Chancery Barrister’s Preliminary Thoughts on the Cohabitation Reform Consultation &#8211; Financial Remedies Journal</title>
		<link>https://financialremediesjournal.com/mind-the-gap-a-chancery-barristers-preliminary-thoughts-on-the-cohabitation-reform-consultation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Ministry of Justice has released its long-anticipated consultation paper on family law and cohabitation reform. As a practitioner whose daily life is spent dealing with the fallout from broken relationships and disputed estates, my immediate reaction is enthusiastic welcome for the broad spirit of the proposed reform but tempered by anxiety driven by some [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Ministry of Justice has released its long-anticipated consultation paper on family law and cohabitation reform. As a practitioner whose daily life is spent dealing with the fallout from broken relationships and disputed estates, my immediate reaction is enthusiastic welcome for the broad spirit of the proposed reform but tempered by anxiety driven by some of the detail.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com/mind-the-gap-a-chancery-barristers-preliminary-thoughts-on-the-cohabitation-reform-consultation/">Full Story</a></p><p>Financial Remedies Journal, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com">financialremediesjournal.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150642</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think &#8211; Financial Remedies Journal</title>
		<link>https://financialremediesjournal.com/maybe-compensation-isnt-what-you-think/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.&#8217; Full StoryFinancial Remedies Journal, 10th June 2026Source: financialremediesjournal.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com/maybe-compensation-isnt-what-you-think/">Full Story</a></p><p>Financial Remedies Journal, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com">financialremediesjournal.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150641</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grim reality of prison conditions laid bare in damning report &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/10/grim-reality-of-prison-conditions-laid-bare-in-damning-report</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The independent monitoring board’s annual report of conditions across the prison estate of England and Wales is stark and unflinching.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 10th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The independent monitoring board’s annual report of conditions across the prison estate of England and Wales is stark and unflinching.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/10/grim-reality-of-prison-conditions-laid-bare-in-damning-report">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 10th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150640</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carer &#8216;who couldn&#8217;t go on&#8217; jailed for killing her mother &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8re26zl7do</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A woman has been jailed for killing her mother after deciding she &#8220;couldn&#8217;t go on&#8221; caring for her.&#8217; Full StoryBBC News, 9th June 2026Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A woman has been jailed for killing her mother after deciding she &#8220;couldn&#8217;t go on&#8221; caring for her.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8re26zl7do">Full Story</a></p><p>BBC News, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150639</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passenger on train to London given first sentence for harassment under new law &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/09/passenger-david-stroud-london-train-harassment-sentence</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A train passenger has become the first person to be sentenced under a new harassment law after a prosecution brought by the British Transport Police (BTP).&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 9th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A train passenger has become the first person to be sentenced under a new harassment law after a prosecution brought by the British Transport <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk/police" data-link-name="in body link" data-component="auto-linked-tag">Police</a> (BTP).&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/09/passenger-david-stroud-london-train-harassment-sentence">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150638</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electrician jailed for life for stabbing partner to death and blowing up London home &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/annabel-rook-clifton-george-sentence-b2992401.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;An electrician who stabbed his partner to death in a frenzied rage, then blew up their home in a gas explosion, has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 23 years.&#8217; Full StoryThe Independent, 9th June 2026Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;An electrician who stabbed his partner to death in a frenzied rage, then blew up their home in a gas explosion, has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 23 years.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/annabel-rook-clifton-george-sentence-b2992401.html">Full Story</a></p><p>The Independent, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150637</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calls to review ‘unduly lenient’ sentence for rapist in Andrew Malkinson miscarriage of justice &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/jun/08/calls-to-review-unduly-lenient-sentence-for-rapist-in-andrew-malkinson-miscarriage-of-justice</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The government’s most senior law officer has been asked to review the “unduly lenient” prison sentence handed to a rapist who evaded police for nearly two decades in one of Britain’s biggest miscarriages of justice.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 8th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The government’s most senior law officer has been asked to review the “unduly lenient” prison sentence handed to a rapist who evaded police for nearly two decades in one of Britain’s biggest miscarriages of justice.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/jun/08/calls-to-review-unduly-lenient-sentence-for-rapist-in-andrew-malkinson-miscarriage-of-justice">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150635</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOKA shoes ruling can help brand owners avoid running into trouble &#8211; OUT-LAW.com</title>
		<link>https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/hoka-shoes-ruling-help-brand-owners-avoid-trouble</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A recent ruling by the Court of Appeal in England and Wales can help brand owners understand how to impose contractual restrictions on retailers over the distribution of their products without falling foul of UK competition rules, experts in competition law have said.&#8217; Full StoryOUT-LAW.com, 8th June 2026Source: www.pinsentmasons.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A recent ruling by the Court of Appeal in England and Wales can help brand owners understand how to impose contractual restrictions on retailers over the distribution of their products without falling foul of UK competition rules, experts in competition law have said.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/hoka-shoes-ruling-help-brand-owners-avoid-trouble">Full Story</a></p><p>OUT-LAW.com, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.pinsentmasons.com">www.pinsentmasons.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150634</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adrian Kreutz: Dualism, Constitutional Conservatism, and Politically Sensitive Judicial Review &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Association</title>
		<link>https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/09/adrian-kreutz-dualism-constitutional-conservatism-and-politically-sensitive-judicial-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Recent public law cases concerning dualism––the operative divide between international and domestic jurisprudence––have prompted renewed debate about the constitutional role of judicial review in the United Kingdom. At first glance, decisions such as R (FDA) v Minister for Cabinet Office [2024] EWHC 1729 (Admin); and R (Al Haq) v Secretary of State for Business and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Recent public law cases concerning dualism––the operative divide between international and domestic jurisprudence––have prompted renewed debate about the constitutional role of judicial review in the United Kingdom. At first glance, decisions such as R (FDA) v Minister for Cabinet Office [2024] EWHC 1729 (Admin); and R (Al Haq) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade [2025] EWCA Civ 1433 appear to signal a retreat from the more dualism-sceptical trajectory associated with earlier authorities like R (Atamewan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2727 (Admin), R (Galdikas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 942 (Admin), and R (KTT) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 2722 (Admin). Yet this interpretation is too hasty. What the recent case law reveals is not a straightforward re-entrenchment of orthodox dualism, but the consolidation of a more procedurally conservative judicial posture centred on coherence, justification, and institutional restraint.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/09/adrian-kreutz-dualism-constitutional-conservatism-and-politically-sensitive-judicial-review/">Full Story</a></p><p>UK Constitutional Law Association, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org">ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150633</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family courts show ‘widespread’ gender bias and victim-blaming, report finds &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/jun/09/family-courts-widespread-gender-bias-victim-blaming-report</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A report has found “widespread and concerning evidence” of bias and victim-blaming in the family courts – primarily disadvantaging women.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 9th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A report has found “widespread and concerning evidence” of bias and victim-blaming in the family courts – primarily disadvantaging women.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/jun/09/family-courts-widespread-gender-bias-victim-blaming-report">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150632</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government to introduce AI ‘legal assistants’ in courts to cut rising case backlog &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ai-crown-courts-uk-backlog-b2992190.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Artificial intelligence-powered virtual legal assistants are set to be introduced across Crown Courts in the UK, the government has announced, in a bid to alleviate the mounting backlog of cases. Ministers assert that the new technology will significantly accelerate legal proceedings.&#8217; Full StoryThe Independent, 9th June 2026Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Artificial intelligence-powered virtual legal assistants are set to be introduced across Crown Courts in the UK, the government has announced, in a bid to alleviate the mounting backlog of cases. Ministers assert that the new technology will significantly accelerate legal proceedings.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ai-crown-courts-uk-backlog-b2992190.html">Full Story</a></p><p>The Independent, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150631</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Care worker who helped boss with child abuse jailed for 25 years &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cddq2971qzlo</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A former children&#8217;s home manager and &#8220;master manipulator&#8221; who abused youngsters in his care has been told he will not go to prison &#8211; as his female assistant was jailed for 25 years for helping his attacks.&#8217; Full StoryBBC News, 8th June 2026Source: www.bbc.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A former children&#8217;s home manager and &#8220;master manipulator&#8221; who abused youngsters in his care has been told he will not go to prison &#8211; as his female assistant was jailed for 25 years for helping his attacks.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cddq2971qzlo">Full Story</a></p><p>BBC News, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk">www.bbc.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150630</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child sexual abuse victims in England and Wales to get help to remove online images &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/09/child-sexual-abuse-victims-in-england-and-wales-to-get-help-to-remove-online-images</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Victims of child sexual abuse in England and Wales will be given help to remove online images of their abuse as part of a wider package of support to end the “prolonged suffering of survivors”.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 9th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Victims of child sexual abuse in England and Wales will be given help to remove online images of their abuse as part of a wider package of support to end the “prolonged suffering of survivors”.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/09/child-sexual-abuse-victims-in-england-and-wales-to-get-help-to-remove-online-images">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150629</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new era for detention in care: Cheshire West Overturned &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2026/06/09/a-new-era-for-detention-in-care-cheshire-west-overturned/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Supreme Court has handed down a unanimous judgment in A Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of a devolution issue under paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 [2026] UKSC 16 (“A Reference”) and has overruled its previous decision in Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.&#8217; Full StoryUK Human [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Supreme Court has handed down a unanimous judgment in A Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of a devolution issue under paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 [2026] UKSC 16 (“A Reference”) and has overruled its previous decision in Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2026/06/09/a-new-era-for-detention-in-care-cheshire-west-overturned/">Full Story</a></p><p>UK Human Rights Blog, 9th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://ukhumanrightsblog.com">ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150628</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guarantees, conditions and sinking claims (SLB v Pak) &#8211; Gatehouse Chambers</title>
		<link>https://gatehouselaw.co.uk/guarantees-conditions-and-sinking-claims-slb-v-pak-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Commercial analysis: Unsuccessful appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) arising out of ten separate arbitral awards concerning ten shipbuilding contracts for container vessels. The buyers contended that the yard’s obligation to provide refund guarantees within 120 days of novation was a condition of the contracts, so that breach entitled them [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Commercial analysis: Unsuccessful appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) arising out of ten separate arbitral awards concerning ten shipbuilding contracts for container vessels. The buyers contended that the yard’s obligation to provide refund guarantees within 120 days of novation was a condition of the contracts, so that breach entitled them to recover loss of bargain damages. The Commercial Court upheld the tribunal’s conclusion that the obligation was an innominate term. The buyers were entitled to cancel the contracts pursuant to the express contractual regime, but not to claim loss of bargain damages.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://gatehouselaw.co.uk/guarantees-conditions-and-sinking-claims-slb-v-pak-2/">Full Story</a></p><p>Gatehouse Chambers, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://gatehouselaw.co.uk">gatehouselaw.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150626</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Push to regulate UK bailiffs too slow, warns supervisory body &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/08/regulation-bailiffs-uk-consumer-rights</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The UK government has been accused of dragging its feet over plans for the mandatory regulation of bailiffs amid concerns about harmful practices in an industry that collects more than £1bn a year from indebted Britons.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 8th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The UK government has been accused of dragging its feet over plans for the mandatory regulation of bailiffs amid concerns about harmful practices in an industry that collects more than £1bn a year from indebted Britons.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/08/regulation-bailiffs-uk-consumer-rights">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150625</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conor McCormick: Monitoring the Judiciary &#8211; UK Constitutional Law Association</title>
		<link>https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/08/conor-mccormick-monitoring-the-judiciary/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Judges primarily decide cases, but they also make strategic decisions aimed at maintaining the constitutional authority of the judiciary as a whole. Doctrines, bundling, timing, and public engagement are among the means by which trust, arguably the most important foundation of judicial authority, is acquired and disbursed.&#8217; Full StoryUK Constitutional Law Association, 8th June 2026Source: [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Judges primarily decide cases, but they also make strategic decisions aimed at maintaining the constitutional authority of the judiciary as a whole. Doctrines, bundling, timing, and public engagement are among the means by which trust, arguably the most important foundation of judicial authority, is acquired and disbursed.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/08/conor-mccormick-monitoring-the-judiciary/">Full Story</a></p><p>UK Constitutional Law Association, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://ukconstitutionallaw.org">ukconstitutionallaw.org</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150624</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court clarifies what counts as a &#8216;building&#8217; &#8211; Law Society&#8217;s Gazette</title>
		<link>https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/legal-updates/court-clarifies-what-counts-as-a-building/5126979.article</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Court of Appeal decision in SGL 1 Ltd v FSV Freeholders Ltd is an important development for landlords, investors, developers and advisers dealing with residential leasehold property and rights of first refusal under Part I of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987).&#8217; Full StoryLaw Society's Gazette, 5th June 2026Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Court of Appeal decision in SGL 1 Ltd v FSV Freeholders Ltd is an important development for landlords, investors, developers and advisers dealing with residential leasehold property and rights of first refusal under Part I of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987).&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/legal-updates/court-clarifies-what-counts-as-a-building/5126979.article">Full Story</a></p><p>Law Society's Gazette, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150623</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation on cohabitation rights: a welcome development &#8211; Law &#038; Religion UK</title>
		<link>https://lawandreligionuk.com/2026/06/08/consultation-on-cohabitation-rights-a-welcome-development/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;In 2021, I published a book entitled Religion and Marriage Law: The Need for Reform. Most of that book focused on the need to modernise the law on how to get married but the penultimate chapter focused on cohabitation rights. That chapter might be seen as an afterthought. But, as I pointed out in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;In 2021, I published a book entitled Religion and Marriage Law: The Need for Reform. Most of that book focused on the need to modernise the law on how to get married but the penultimate chapter focused on cohabitation rights. That chapter might be seen as an afterthought. But, as I pointed out in the introduction to that chapter, ‘it was in many ways the most important’ of the reform proposals I was advocating. The new Government consultation, A Fairer End to Relationships, is to be welcomed, therefore, since it includes proposals to give cohabitation rights on separation and death alongside modernising the law on financial remedies on divorce.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://lawandreligionuk.com/2026/06/08/consultation-on-cohabitation-rights-a-welcome-development/">Full Story</a></p><p>Law &amp; Religion UK, 8th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://lawandreligionuk.com">lawandreligionuk.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150622</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When does a duty to consult arise in public law?</title>
		<link>https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2026/06/05/when-does-a-duty-to-consult-arise-in-public-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;It is well-known that there is no general common law duty on public authorities to carry out a consultation before making a decision. However, such a duty may arise if certain conditions are met. The High Court has recently had an opportunity to consider, and clarify, the precise circumstances under which such a duty arises. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;It is well-known that there is no general common law duty on public authorities to carry out a consultation before making a decision. However, such a duty may arise if certain conditions are met. The High Court has recently had an opportunity to consider, and clarify, the precise circumstances under which such a duty arises. The case is R (Freedom from Torture and the Helen Bamber Foundation) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 1278 (Admin) (28 May 2026).&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2026/06/05/when-does-a-duty-to-consult-arise-in-public-law/">Full Story</a></p><p>Administrative Court Blog, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com">administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150621</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2026/06/bailii-recent-decisions-2853/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Magic Investments SA v Broadbent &#38; Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 711 (05 June 2026) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hicks &#38; Ors v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 706 (05 June 2026) High Court (Administrative Court) Magu v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2026] EWHC 1242 (Admin) (02 June 2026) Whelan v [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Court of Appeal (Civil Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2026/711.html">Magic Investments SA v Broadbent &amp; Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 711 (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2026/706.html">Hicks &amp; Ors v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 706 (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1242.html">Magu v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2026] EWHC 1242 (Admin) (02 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1241.html">Whelan v Court of Appeal in Paris, France [2026] EWHC 1241 (Admin) (02 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1352.html">Askan v HM Land Registry [2026] EWHC 1352 (Ch) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1271.html">Chady Aero Developments Ltd v Aero Engine Finance LLP [2026] EWHC 1271 (Ch) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Family Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2026/1359.html">AA &amp; BB, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 1359 (Fam) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (King’s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1365.html">AXA Insurance PLC v Maher [2026] EWHC 1365 (KB) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1344.html">Mannings Organisation Ltd &amp; Anor v Manning [2026] EWHC 1344 (KB) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Technology and Construction Court)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2026/1354.html">Essendi UK Hotels 2 Ltd v London Property Company Ltd [2026] EWHC 1354 (TCC) (05 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150619</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do if a party to financial remedy proceedings dies &#8211; St John&#8217;s Chambers</title>
		<link>https://www.stjohnschambers.co.uk/articles-publication/what-to-do-if-a-party-to-financial-remedy-proceedings-dies</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Kanabar v Kanabar [2026] EWCA Civ 582 determined that where party had died after issuing an appeal, but where no person was willing to become a personal representative to pursue the appeal on behalf of the estate, the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to FPR rule 30.10. This [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in <em>Kanabar v Kanabar</em> [2026] EWCA Civ 582 determined that where party had died after issuing an appeal, but where no person was willing to become a personal representative to pursue the appeal on behalf of the estate, the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to FPR rule 30.10. This case provides a convenient opportunity to review the law and practice governing the situation where a party to divorce and financial remedy proceedings dies.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stjohnschambers.co.uk/articles-publication/what-to-do-if-a-party-to-financial-remedy-proceedings-dies">Full Story</a></p><p>St John's Chambers, 2nd June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.stjohnschambers.co.uk">www.stjohnschambers.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150620</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>90 Year Lease or Contractual Licence? &#8211; Wilberforce Chambers</title>
		<link>https://www.wilberforce.co.uk/case-study/90-year-lease-or-contractual-license/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;On 8 May 2026, judgment was handed down in Quadrant-Brownswood Tenant Co-operative Ltd v Hitchens, an interesting possession claim in the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch.&#8217; Full StoryWilberforce Chambers, 11th May 2026Source: www.wilberforce.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;On 8 May 2026, judgment was handed down in <em>Quadrant-Brownswood Tenant Co-operative Ltd v Hitchens</em>, an interesting possession claim in the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.wilberforce.co.uk/case-study/90-year-lease-or-contractual-license/">Full Story</a></p><p>Wilberforce Chambers, 11th May 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.wilberforce.co.uk">www.wilberforce.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150618</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two brothers jailed for killing 16-year-old boy with car in Sheffield &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/04/two-brothers-jailed-killing-16-year-old-boy-car-sheffield</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Two brothers have been jailed for killing a 16-year-old boy who was “in the wrong place at the wrong time” when he was hit while walking by a car being deliberately driven at a group on bikes.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 4th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Two brothers have been jailed for killing a 16-year-old boy who was “in the wrong place at the wrong time” when he was hit while walking by a car being deliberately driven at a group on bikes.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/04/two-brothers-jailed-killing-16-year-old-boy-car-sheffield">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150616</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Kroupeeva v Kroupeev tells us on orders for variation of nuptial settlements and adverse inferences in trust and divorce cases &#8211; Wilberforce Chambers</title>
		<link>https://www.wilberforce.co.uk/article/what-kroupeeva-v-kroupeev-tells-us/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;In Kroupeeva v Kroupeev [2026] EWFC 85, James Ewins KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge found that an offshore discretionary trust (“the Rossini Trust”) and an offshore company (“Waterford”) held by it comprised a nuptial settlement capable of variation pursuant to s24(1)(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.&#8217; Full StoryWilberforce Chambers, 2nd June [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;In <em><u>Kroupeeva v Kroupeev</u></em> [2026] EWFC 85, James Ewins KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge found that an offshore discretionary trust (“the Rossini Trust”) and an offshore company (“Waterford”) held by it comprised a nuptial settlement capable of variation pursuant to s24(1)(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.wilberforce.co.uk/article/what-kroupeeva-v-kroupeev-tells-us/">Full Story</a></p><p>Wilberforce Chambers, 2nd June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.wilberforce.co.uk">www.wilberforce.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150617</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upper Tribunal hands down ruling on costs awards in cases involving tree preservation orders &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/property/404-property-news/100705-upper-tribunal-hands-down-ruling-on-costs-awards-in-cases-involving-tree-preservation-orders</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) has the power to make costs orders in tree preservation cases.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) has the power to make costs orders in tree preservation cases.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/property/404-property-news/100705-upper-tribunal-hands-down-ruling-on-costs-awards-in-cases-involving-tree-preservation-orders">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150615</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADASS calls for cautious approach to implementing Supreme Court ruling on deprivation of liberty, but warns of potential for litigation &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/adult-social-care/391-adult-care-news/100709-adass-calls-for-cautious-approach-to-implementing-supreme-court-ruling-on-deprivation-of-liberty-but-warns-of-potential-for-litigation</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) has recommended a cautious approach to implementation of this week’s Supreme Court ruling on deprivation of liberty and valid consent that overruled its 2014 judgment in Cheshire West.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) has recommended a cautious approach to implementation of this week’s Supreme Court ruling on deprivation of liberty and valid consent that overruled its 2014 judgment in <em>Cheshire West</em>.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/adult-social-care/391-adult-care-news/100709-adass-calls-for-cautious-approach-to-implementing-supreme-court-ruling-on-deprivation-of-liberty-but-warns-of-potential-for-litigation">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150614</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refusal to take planning enforcement action &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/planning/318-planning-features/100701-refusal-to-take-planning-enforcement-action</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The High Court recently upheld a council’s refusal to take enforcement action where there was limited information about the character of a former coal yard use. Emma Dring looks at the lessons from the judgment.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The High Court recently upheld a council’s refusal to take enforcement action where there was limited information about the character of a former coal yard use. Emma Dring looks at the lessons from the judgment.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/planning/318-planning-features/100701-refusal-to-take-planning-enforcement-action">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150613</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Liability Orders (BLOs) – Crest Nicholson v Ardmore &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/sharpeedge/808-sharpeedge-planning/100697-building-liability-orders-blos-crest-nicholson-v-ardmore</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;In this article, Rachel Murray-Smith, Conrad Turnock and Helen Arthur explain the significance of Crest Nicholson v Ardmore Ardmore [2026] EWHC 789 (TCC); [2026] EWHC 1069 (TCC), one of the first major decisions to consider the scope of building liability orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 and its impact on available routes to recovery.&#8217; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;In this article, Rachel Murray-Smith, Conrad Turnock and Helen Arthur explain the significance of <em>Crest Nicholson v Ardmore Ardmore</em> [2026] EWHC 789 (TCC); [2026] EWHC 1069 (TCC), one of the first major decisions to consider the scope of building liability orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 and its impact on available routes to recovery.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/sharpeedge/808-sharpeedge-planning/100697-building-liability-orders-blos-crest-nicholson-v-ardmore">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150612</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>County court delays continue to fall, figures show &#8211; Legal futures</title>
		<link>https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/county-court-delays-continue-to-fall-figures-show</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Delays in the county courts continue to fall – and sharply, according to the latest official figures from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).&#8217; Full StoryLegal Futures, 5th June 2026Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Delays in the county courts continue to fall – and sharply, according to the latest official figures from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/county-court-delays-continue-to-fall-figures-show">Full Story</a></p><p>Legal Futures, 5th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.legalfutures.co.uk">www.legalfutures.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150611</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a deprivation of liberty? &#8211; Administrative Court Blog</title>
		<link>https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2026/06/04/what-is-a-deprivation-of-liberty/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects the right to liberty, and guarantees that nobody shall be “deprived” of their liberty unless certain conditions, set out in that Article, are met. &#8216;But what constitutes a “deprivation of liberty”? And in particular, when might someone who is said to lack capacity in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects the right to liberty, and guarantees that nobody shall be “deprived” of their liberty unless certain conditions, set out in that Article, are met.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8216;But what constitutes a “deprivation of liberty”? And in particular, when might someone who is said to lack capacity in domestic law be able to provide valid consent to what might otherwise constitute such a deprivation of liberty? These questions were tackled by the Supreme Court in the case of <em>Re Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference </em>[2026] UKSC 16 (2 June 2026). The Court’s judgment is extremely important for social workers, mental health practitioners and medical personnel, as well as human rights scholars and advocates more generally.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2026/06/04/what-is-a-deprivation-of-liberty/">Full Story</a></p><p>Administrative Court Blog, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com">administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150610</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge sacked for sending ‘highly sexualised image’ to court staff &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/judge-andrew-simpson-newcastle-jcio-b2989540.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A judge has been removed from office for gross misconduct after he sent a “highly sexualised image” to a member of court staff.&#8217; Full StoryThe Independent, 4th June 2026Source: www.independent.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A judge has been removed from office for gross misconduct after he sent a “highly sexualised image” to a member of court staff.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/judge-andrew-simpson-newcastle-jcio-b2989540.html">Full Story</a></p><p>The Independent, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk">www.independent.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150608</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoJ unveils family law reforms to protect unmarried couples &#8211; Law Society Gazette</title>
		<link>https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/moj-unveils-family-law-reforms-to-protect-unmarried-couples/5126987.article</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The government will today publish a long-awaited family law consultation to strengthen the financial rights of unmarried couples if they split up.&#8217; Full StoryLaw Society Gazette, 4th June 2026Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The government will today publish a long-awaited family law consultation to strengthen the financial rights of unmarried couples if they split up.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/moj-unveils-family-law-reforms-to-protect-unmarried-couples/5126987.article">Full Story</a></p><p>Law Society Gazette, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150609</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decades of reviews have failed to fix civil justice crisis, says new report &#8211; Law Society Gazette</title>
		<link>https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/decades-of-reviews-have-failed-to-fix-civil-justice-crisis-says-new-report/5126986.article</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;A new report authored by a leading academic has called for a wholly new approach to civil justice, condemning the succession of judge-led reviews that have tried to fix the systemic crisis.&#8217; Full StoryLaw Society Gazette, 4th June 2026Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;A new report authored by a leading academic has called for a wholly new approach to civil justice, condemning the succession of judge-led reviews that have tried to fix the systemic crisis.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/decades-of-reviews-have-failed-to-fix-civil-justice-crisis-says-new-report/5126986.article">Full Story</a></p><p>Law Society Gazette, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk">www.lawgazette.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150607</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gohil v Gohil &#038; Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam) &#8211; Financial Remedies Journal</title>
		<link>https://financialremediesjournal.com/gohil-v-gohil-ors-2025-ewhc-3646-fam/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150606</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Williams J. The High Court considered the impact of a £28m confiscation order, disputed beneficial ownership claims, and criminally tainted assets in a restored financial remedy claim following the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Gohil (Appellant) v Gohil (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 61.&#8217; Full StoryFinancial Remedies Journal, 4th June 2026Source: financialremediesjournal.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Williams J. The High Court considered the impact of a £28m confiscation order, disputed beneficial ownership claims, and criminally tainted assets in a restored financial remedy claim following the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <em>Gohil (Appellant) v Gohil (Respondent)</em> [2015] UKSC 61.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com/gohil-v-gohil-ors-2025-ewhc-3646-fam/">Full Story</a></p><p>Financial Remedies Journal, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://financialremediesjournal.com">financialremediesjournal.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150606</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family of girl left brain-damaged at birth accept £28m NHS payout &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/04/girl-brain-damaged-at-birth-28m-nhs-payout-romford</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The family of a girl left brain-damaged at birth have agreed to accept £28m in damages after the NHS trust involved admitted that its mistakes led to the tragedy.&#8217; Full StoryThe Guardian, 4th June 2026Source: www.theguardian.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The family of a girl left brain-damaged at birth have agreed to accept £28m in damages after the NHS trust involved admitted that its mistakes led to the tragedy.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/04/girl-brain-damaged-at-birth-28m-nhs-payout-romford">Full Story</a></p><p>The Guardian, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com">www.theguardian.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150605</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAILII: Recent Decisions</title>
		<link>https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/2026/06/bailii-recent-decisions-2852/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[law reports]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[High Court (Administrative Court) Beyond GM &#38; Ors v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2026] EWHC 1306 (Admin) (04 June 2026) AOX, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall Police &#38; Anor [2026] EWHC 1217 (Admin) (04 June 2026) High Court (Chancery Division) Maher v Holmes [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High Court (Administrative Court)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1306.html">Beyond GM &amp; Ors v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2026] EWHC 1306 (Admin) (04 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2026/1217.html">AOX, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall Police &amp; Anor [2026] EWHC 1217 (Admin) (04 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (Chancery Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1337.html">Maher v Holmes [2026] EWHC 1337 (Ch) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2026/1268.html">BLCP Eden 1 Ltd &amp; Anor v Rooksmead Securities Ltd &amp; Ors [2026] EWHC 1268 (Ch) (01 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>High Court (King&#8217;s Bench Division)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2026/1331.html">Picker v TEW [2026] EWHC 1331 (KB) (03 June 2026)</a></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.bailii.org">www.bailii.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150604</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secondary victims: once again the Court declines to distinguish Paul &#8211; Quarterly Medical Law Review</title>
		<link>https://1corqmlr.com/2026/06/02/secondary-victims-once-again-the-court-declines-to-distinguish-paul/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;In BJS, a claim where a mother (the Second Claimant) witnessed her son (the First Claimant) suffer catastrophic injuries whilst an inpatient on a psychiatric ward, the High Court rejected an attempt to distinguish the Supreme Court’s decision in Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UK SC 1.&#8217; Full StoryQuarterly Medical Law Review, 2nd [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;In <em>BJS</em>, a claim where a mother (the Second Claimant) witnessed her son (the First Claimant) suffer catastrophic injuries whilst an inpatient on a psychiatric ward, the High Court rejected an attempt to distinguish the Supreme Court’s decision in <em>Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust</em> [2024] UK SC 1.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://1corqmlr.com/2026/06/02/secondary-victims-once-again-the-court-declines-to-distinguish-paul/">Full Story</a></p><p>Quarterly Medical Law Review, 2nd June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://1corqmlr.com">1corqmlr.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150603</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government acted unlawfully when changing policy on allocation of asylum accommodation: High Court &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/housing-law/397-housing-news/100694-government-acted-unlawfully-when-changing-policy-on-allocation-of-asylum-accommodation-high-court</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Home Office acted unlawfully when it changed its policy on allocation of asylum accommodation, failing to consult adequately and breaching both the public sector equality duty and the Tameside duty, the High Court has found.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Home Office acted unlawfully when it changed its policy on allocation of asylum accommodation, failing to consult adequately and breaching both the public sector equality duty and the <em>Tameside</em> duty, the High Court has found.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/housing-law/397-housing-news/100694-government-acted-unlawfully-when-changing-policy-on-allocation-of-asylum-accommodation-high-court">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150602</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Part 6 housing services be personalised? &#8211; Local Government Lawyer</title>
		<link>https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/housing-law/315-housing-features/100690-can-part-6-housing-services-be-personalised</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The Court of Appeal has held that steps to allocate Part 6 accommodation cannot be included in a personalised housing plan. Matt Hutchings KC and Lindsay Johnson analyse the ruling.&#8217; Full StoryLocal Government Lawyer, 3rd June 2026Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The Court of Appeal has held that steps to allocate Part 6 accommodation cannot be included in a personalised housing plan. Matt Hutchings KC and Lindsay Johnson analyse the ruling.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/housing-law/315-housing-features/100690-can-part-6-housing-services-be-personalised">Full Story</a></p><p>Local Government Lawyer, 3rd June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk">www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150601</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New funerary methods get legal framework for the first time &#8211; Law Commission</title>
		<link>https://lawcom.gov.uk/news/new-funerary-methods-get-legal-framework-for-the-first-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Alternatives to burial and cremation in England and Wales could be made available in future, following a Law Commission report published today that recommends a clear legal framework for the regulation of new funerary methods.&#8217; Full StoryLaw Commission, 4th June 2026Source: lawcom.gov.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Alternatives to burial and cremation in England and Wales could be made available in future, following a Law Commission report published today that recommends a clear legal framework for the regulation of new funerary methods.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://lawcom.gov.uk/news/new-funerary-methods-get-legal-framework-for-the-first-time/">Full Story</a></p><p>Law Commission, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://lawcom.gov.uk">lawcom.gov.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150600</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jurisdictional guidance for Remote Participation &#8211; Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</title>
		<link>https://www.judiciary.uk/jurisdictional-guidance-for-remote-participation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Updated remote participation guidance for the Civil and Family courts, and the Tribunal jurisdictions has now been published.&#8217; Full StoryCourts and Tribunals Judiciary, 4th June 2026Source: www.judiciary.uk]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Updated remote participation guidance for the Civil and Family courts, and the Tribunal jurisdictions has now been published.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/jurisdictional-guidance-for-remote-participation/">Full Story</a></p><p>Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.judiciary.uk">www.judiciary.uk</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150599</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another cautionary tale about AI “hallucinations” in legal research &#8211; UK Human Rights Blog</title>
		<link>https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2026/06/04/another-cautionary-tale-about-ai-hallucinations-in-legal-research/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;This was an unfortunate case of delegation, where the ultimate outsourcing ended up with an AI system.&#8217; Full StoryUK Human Rights Blog, 4th June 2026Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;This was an unfortunate case of delegation, where the ultimate outsourcing ended up with an AI system.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2026/06/04/another-cautionary-tale-about-ai-hallucinations-in-legal-research/">Full Story</a></p><p>UK Human Rights Blog, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://ukhumanrightsblog.com">ukhumanrightsblog.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150598</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time limits, discretions and the Ombudsman &#8211; Pensions Barrister</title>
		<link>https://www.pensionsbarrister.com/post/time-limits-discretions-and-the-ombudsman</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.innertemplelibrary.com/?p=150597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Paul Newman KC looks at a recent NHS Pension Scheme determination which shows why a deadline may not be the end of the matter where the scheme contains a discretion to extend time.&#8217; Full StoryPensions Barrister, 4th June 2026Source: www.pensionsbarrister.com]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;<span class="ATqq4">Paul Newman KC looks at a recent NHS Pension Scheme determination which shows why a deadline may not be the end of the matter where the scheme contains a discretion to extend time.&#8217;</span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.pensionsbarrister.com/post/time-limits-discretions-and-the-ombudsman">Full Story</a></p><p>Pensions Barrister, 4th June 2026</p><p>Source: <a href="https://www.pensionsbarrister.com">www.pensionsbarrister.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">150597</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
